scholarly journals Sustainable and Optimal “Uniqueness” Contract in Public-Private Partnership Projects of Transportation Infrastructure

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Yingjun Zhu ◽  
Zhitong Gao ◽  
Ruihai Li
Keyword(s):  
Social Welfare ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Transportation Infrastructure ◽  
Private Capital ◽  
Equilibrium Relation ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Welfare Losses ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

To control the “uniqueness” risk in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects of transportation infrastructure, we design a simplified “uniqueness” contract model by incorporating the impact of the initial investment which is based on the Bertrand model. The nonlinear programming method is adopted to derive the optimal “uniqueness” contracts for incumbent private capital, the public, and the social welfare, respectively. The simulation results show that the achievement of the optimal “uniqueness” contract is essentially the result of a compromise between the private capital, the public, and social welfare. The extent to which such a contract reduces the probability of “uniqueness” risk mainly depends on the equilibrium relation between the interests of private capital and the public. The initial investment is not related to the government default when the contract does not take into account the interests of the private capital. Furthermore, the “uniqueness” contracts between private capital and the government are mainly for anticompetitive purpose in the PPP market of transportation infrastructure. Unless the contract terms focus on the improvement of social welfare, entering a “uniqueness” contract will cause social welfare losses.

scholarly journals Public Private Partnership in Transportation: The Case of the Washington State

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Murray
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Political Stability ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Transportation Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Design Build ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Government

While the world has changed dramatically in the last five decades or so, transportation has not been able to keep pace with the overall development. However, in order to ensure prosperity of a country or a state, it is imperative that the ability to move people and products must improve. This paper examines the status of transportation infrastructure and its funding in the State of Washington, USA and suggests some new approaches towards public-private partnership (PPP) in the area. In the process, the success and some of the challenges of PPP are also discussed. In the US, traditionally, people were not charged direct tax such as a toll for using the roads, the primary mode of financing transportation being gas tax. The new sources of revenue collection being developed include: Specific roadway pricing Mileage-based user fees Real-time variable rate roadway pricing. Traditionally, in the US, the public sector shouldered the main responsibility for managing transportation�acquire right-of-way (ROW), design, finance, operate, own, and maintain while the private sector was only allowed to build roads following all the regulation and permits introduced by the government. The reformed PPP model awards ‘design-build’ contracts on a competitive ‘best-value’ basis instead of the conventional ‘low-bid’ basis and thus turn over the design build responsibility to the private sector leaving with the government the financing and maintenance of the roads. The idea is to give road to everybody while allowing the private sector to earn some profit and the public sector to save some money. However, PPP could face a problem if: the traffic and revenue estimates are wrong traffic and revenue risks are taken by private sector but at a huge price construction costs are underestimated the people do not accept the proposition the PPP legislation is not favourable. For any infrastructure project such as transportation to succeed, what is most critical is a set of factors including feasibility, essentiality, reliable revenue forecasts, collateral, credibility, political stability, and transparency. Above all, the government has the responsibility to all its citizens while the private sector is accountable to its stockholders and business partners. What is therefore important is to see how the two parties meet their obligations while building a suitable transportation infrastructure.

scholarly journals Institutional Support of the Public-Private Partnership in the Republic of Poland

2019 ◽  
pp. 145-155
Author(s):  
Nykola Lakhyzha ◽  
Svitlana Yehorycheva
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Organizational Support ◽  
Institutional Support ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Law Firms ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The experience of the institutional support of public-private partnership in the Republic of Poland has been analyzed. It is noted that Poland was one of the first among the post-communist countries to implement a mechanism of public-private partnership. The peculiarities of the practice of realization of public-private partnership in Poland during the 1990s and its legal support were determined. The possibility of its development on the basis of general norms of civil, economic, administrative and other branches of law is emphasized. The process of development and adoption of separate laws on public-private partnership and their specific features are described. The essence of discussions about the need for creation of a special authorized body for regulation of public-private partnership, which was caused by the problems that arose from public and private partners during the conclusion and implementation of the relevant agreements, was disclosed. The modern components of organizational support for supporting the development of public-private partnership in Poland, their role and their inherent functions are revealed: the Department for Public-Private Partnerships of the Ministry of Investment and Development, similar departments in public administration bodies of different levels, the Public-Private Partnership Platform, Polish Entrepreneurship Development Agency, Institute of Public Private Partnership, private law firms, scientific and educational institutions. The necessity to improve the institutional support of public-private partnership, which is realized by the government of Poland as well, is stated. The content and significance of the latest program documents in this area that are intended to improve the process of administration the development of public-private partnership — the concept «The vision of sustainable development for Polish business 2050» and «Government policy in the field of development of public-private partnership» are characterized. The importance of using the experience of the Republic of Poland in the practice of public administration of the Ukrainian system of public-private partnership is emphasized.

scholarly journals PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN HOUSING CONSTRUCTION IN UKRAINE

Ekonomika ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Elena Balabenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Housing Construction ◽  
Private Capital ◽  
Construction Operations ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
The Public ◽  
Special Pattern ◽  
Private Investors ◽  
House Building

Abstract. The paper presents an analysis of construction operations, retarding tendencies, necessity to attract private capital to civil engineering, with an emphasis on the development of national cooperation and con-struction business in the realization of concrete social and economic and investment projects in Ukraine in the form of public–private partnership. The problems of the development of housing construction institutions are also presented within the framework of the public–private partnership and the preconditions for the topical character of the private capital attraction to this sphere. The necessity of developing the public–private partnership in housing construction has been justified. The development of the trend will help to unify the interests of power, business, financial institutions and private investors. Also, a special pattern of the public–private partnership taking into consideration the peculiarities of the contemporary house-building industry is proposed.Key words: housing construction, public–private partnership, investment, pattern

scholarly journals Time and Cost Overrun Analysis in PPP Based Roads and Highway Projects in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1761-1768
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Cost Overrun ◽  
Construction Process ◽  
Highway Projects ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Degree Of Risk ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

The economic development of any country depends upon infrastructure of roads and highways but its construction, process and maintenance of roads and highways is not as simple as it seems like as growth of roads and highway projects involves massive capital and time. Nevertheless, the government does not have the resources required for the resolution. Public private partnership (PPP) is the resolution of this problem however, roads and highway projects comprises higher degree of risk for the private players which demoralizes private parties from capitalizing in highway projects. This paper discovers the prevailing literature on risks involved in roads and highway projects and sources of time and cost overrun in roads and highway projects for the purpose of analysis of major risks which effects in time and cost overrun in PPP built roads and highway projects. This paper also defines the impact of recognized risks over and done with questioner survey.

scholarly journals Ten Years of Public Private Partnership in Jakarta Drinking Water Service (1998-2007): Eastern Jakarta Drinking Water Service by Thames PAM Jaya

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Renalia Iwan
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Cooperation Agreement ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Water Service ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government

<p>Clean water is crucial for survival and economic development. Everyday, people need a sufficient amount and a suitable quality of water for drinking, cleaning and sanitation. However, rapid population growth, pollution and climate change have made water a scarce resource, which everyone competed. The United Nations Development Program's recent report stated that more than 1 billion people, up to this day, are without access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Lack of access to clean water can cause social, economic and health problems. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find solutions to this problem. To solve the problem of water scarcity, International Financial Institutions introduced Public Private Partnership (PPP) in the management of water sector. PPP is a concept which involves private sector participation in the management of drinking water service. In PPP, water is recognized as an economic good which is recognised under the 1992 Dublin Principles. It was hoped that by placing an economic value on water, efficient and equitable use of water can be achieved. It was also hoped that it would encourage conservation and protection of water resources. However, studies show opposite results from the Principle. Jakarta drinking water service is one example of a failed PPP. Jakarta, the Capital City of Indonesia, adopted Public Private Partnership (PPP) in the management of its drinking water service in 1998. The twenty five years concession contract was granted to Thames Water International (TWI) and its local partner, Kekarpola Airindo (KATI), now known as Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ). This company is responsible for the management of Eastern Jakarta drinking water service. This research was aimed to evaluate Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ) performance on water provision in Eastern Jakarta, ten years into the twenty five years concession by undergoing a qualitative research method. A range of semi-structured interviews were used to: gain perceptions and opinions of each stakeholder on the Public Private Partnership (PPP), identify the advantages and/or disadvantages of the water privatization in the capital city and to identify the constraints and limitations facing the private sector. Participants involved in this research include Government officials, Thames PAM Jaya, Jakarta Water Supply Regulatory Body (JWSRB), non governmental organizations (NGOs), and TPJ customers. The analysis concludes that Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Eastern Jakarta does not bring improvement to the region's drinking water service. Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ) had failed in fulfilling targets set in the Cooperation Agreement. Lack of transparency and public tendering in the process of forming the public private partnership may have contributed to this poor performance because the proper search for a competent partner was short circuited. Political interference in the bidding process is a form of corruption in which the company granted the contract was clearly complicit. The water tariff in Jakarta is not only the highest in Indonesia, but it is also the highest in the Southeast Asia region. The quality of its service, however, is still of poor quality. Limited access to water due to its high price and low service has resulted in water hacking and the on-going use of groundwater. The Cooperation Agreement, on the other hand, has locked the Government of Indonesia into a long term partnership which is very disadvantageous for the government and the residents. Private sector involvement should be the last alternative to improve the management of the water supply service in Indonesia.</p>

scholarly journals Public–Private Partnership Monitor: Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Energy Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Sector Investment ◽  
Total Investment ◽  
The Government

The Government of Pakistan strongly supports public–private partnership (PPP) initiatives. From 1990 to 2019, Pakistan witnessed 108 financially closed PPP projects, with a total investment of approximately $28.4 billion. About 88% of these projects are in the energy sector, attracting more than $24.7billion, followed by investments in the port sector. In early 2021, Parliament approved the amendments to the 2017 PPP Law, enacting the Public Private Partnership Authority (Amendment) Act 2021. This further strengthens the enabling legal and regulatory framework for developing and implementing PPPs, thereby promoting private sector investment in public infrastructure and related services.

scholarly journals АНАЛІЗ ТЕНДЕНЦІЙ РОЗВИТКУ СИСТЕМИ ДЕРЖАВНО-ПРИВАТНОГО ПАРТНЕРСТВА НА РИНКУ ПОСЛУГ АВТОМОБІЛЬНОГО ТРАНСПОРТУ

2021 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 94-103
Author(s):  
Даниїл В. Лапоног
Keyword(s):  
Private Investment ◽  
Road Transport ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Partnership Development ◽  
Transport Services ◽  
The Government

The article seeks to provide insights into contemporary research in public-private partnership development in the road transport market. The study reviews a range of world public-private partnership best practices which demonstrate that effective interaction between government and business at different levels (national, subnational and regional) allows to attract and allocate investment resources more effectively, thus contributing to creating new jobs, promoting better infrastructure development and enhancing the overall quality of life in the country. It is argued that among the key factors boosting the public-private partnership market development the most significant is the level of institutionalization. It is also asserted that this factor, in combination with the relevant political environment and the capital market specifics, facilitates building successful partnerships. Moreover, government initiatives together with legal and regulatory interaction frameworks shape solid foundation to encourage further public-private partnership development by gaining positive effects from successful implementation of such partnerships, designing roadmaps and unified standard procedures and processes aimed at simplifying the relationships between the private sector and the government. Apart from the above, it is highlighted that the institutional factor aligned with the government strategic goals affects the formation and legitimation of public-private partnership markets. The study also provides argument that through the models of public-private partnerships the public sector can benefit, in the first place by utilizing resources of private companies, thus fostering further infrastructure development and raising the effectiveness and efficiency of road transport services market. The findings reveal that the purpose of public-private partnership programs institutionalization in the sector of road transport services is to enhance government motivation to attract private investment and offer new road network services based on public-private partnership contracts which will contribute to ensure the quality of road services.

scholarly journals Public-Private Partnership in Health Care and Its Impact on Health Outcomes: Evidence from Ruharo Mission Hospital in Uganda

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Justus Asasira ◽  
Frank Ahimbisibwe
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Facilities ◽  
Mission Hospital ◽  
Private Providers ◽  
The Impact

Background: Uganda’s government has embraced private provision of social services including health care. The involvement of private providers is an indicator that the public facilities are not sufficient enough to meet the high demands of the ever-increasing population. This has been done through partnership arrangements. This paper discusses the impact of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in health care outcomes of the local population and opportunities for improving health outcomes, challenges facing private providers in a low income setting.Methodology: Data were collected using qualitative methods in January 2017 through interview (using semi-structured questions) at Ruharo Mission Hospital (RMH) administration, health workers, district health office and used a structured questionnaire for patients/clients. This was a nascent study, with a sample size of 22 respondents. The hospital has three departments; Organized Useful Rehabilitation Services (OURS), General Medical Services (GMS) and Eye Department (ED). All the departments of the hospital were represented in this study.Results: The hospital is a Church of Uganda project and runs a budget of 5 billion shillings ($ 1,351,351.4) annually, had multiple sources of funding including PHC funding annually and that, health services were delivered adequately to clients. Much as some services were accessed at no costs, other services like eye treatment were found expensive on the side of clients. The hospital’s hybrid mode of delivering health services through outreaches and facility-based services was cherished, however it had no ambulance and relied only on a hospital van.Conclusions and Recommendations: Our study concluded that if private providers are supported under the partnership arrangement, they can adequately deliver services to the clients and decongest the public facilities. We recommend that the government devote funds to support the hospital through employing more sub-seconded staff, procuring medicines, and ambulances to enable it to subsidize services especially eye treatment and other services not supported under the partnership.

Evolution of the mechanism of regulation owing to development road economy on the basis of innovative principles public-private partnership

2020 ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
Vdovenko ◽  
Korobova ◽  
Pavlenko
Keyword(s):  
National Economy ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
The State ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Investment Activity ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Road ◽  
Road Development ◽  
The Impact

Subject of research – relations in the process of improving the mechanism of regulation of road development in Ukraine and putting into practice proposals to ensure innovative approaches and modernization of the road system on the basis of public-private partnership are formed. The purpose of the article. The scien- tific and methodological and practical proposals with the purpose of applying the mechanism of regulation of the road economy development as a promising of the national economy have been developed. The methodology of the work. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the system of both general scientific and special methods of scientific cognition, fundamental provisions of modern economic theory and practice. In scientific research such methods as mono- graphic in formulating approaches that the development of the road economy de- pends not only on the level of economic development, but also on the influence of regulatory mechanisms that are applied, economic and statistical – in determining and calculating the concession payment for the right to management are used. The results of the work – the scientific results of the improved basis of development of the national economy through the creation of an effective mechanism for the implementation of new rules and tasks in the system of regulation in the field of road economy are proposed for application. Conclusions. We propose modern mea- sures and tools for shaping the innovative environment, and we propose to intro- duce such rules that would meet the interests of the authorities, increase the level of protection of interests of private investors and the state in the implemen- tation of public-private partnership projects. The advantages in developing mech- anisms for guaranteeing public-private partnership project financing by the state partner during the whole project implementation period are substantiated; mecha- nism of fair compensation in case of early termination of the public-private part- nership contract at the initiative of the state partner in order to compensate for the reasonable losses of the private partner. The scientific-methodological and practical proposals for the purpose of application of the mechanism of regulation of the road development are revealed. It is proved that due to the impact of mod- ernization transformations, the public-private partnership can play a dual role as an institutional innovation and has every reason to combine both the modernization of investment activity and the modernization of the regulatory mechanism for the purpose of evolutionary transformations in the leading spheres of the national economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document