Abstract 3423: Overweight and obesity predict better overall survival rates in cancer patients with distant metastases

Author(s):  
Ngan M. Tsang
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngan Ming Tsang ◽  
Ping Ching Pai ◽  
Chi Cheng Chuang ◽  
Wen Ching Chuang ◽  
Chen Kan Tseng ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Lv ◽  
Yuqi Liang ◽  
Huaxi Liu ◽  
Delong Mo

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Mendenhall ◽  
John D. Reith ◽  
Mark T. Scarborough ◽  
Bruce K. Stechmiller ◽  
Nancy P. Mendenhall

Abstract Purpose: To review the treatment and outcomes of patients with mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (MC). Materials and Methods: Review of the pertinent literature. Results: MC is a rare aggressive small round blue cell malignancy that may arise in either bone or soft tissue. It usually presents in the 2nd or 3rd decade of life and exhibits an approximately equal gender predilection. Patients usually present with pain and swelling. The majority of MCs arise in either the trunk or extremities. Distant metastases are present at diagnosis in about 15% of patients. The most common sites for distant metastases are lung and bone. The optimal treatment is surgery. Although the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear, an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen combined with ifosfamide or cisplatin, may be considered. Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is employed for patients with close (<5 mm) or positive margins as well as those with incompletely resectable tumors. The most common mechanism of recurrence is hematogenous dissemination. Although most recurrences are observed within 5 years of treatment, late recurrences are not unusual. The likelihood of successful salvage in the event of a recurrence is modest. The overall survival rates for all patients are approximately 50% at 5 years and 40% at 10 years. The overall survival rates for the subset of patients with localized disease that is resected are approximately 70% to 80% at 5 years and 60% at 10 years. Conclusion: Patients with MCs are optimally treated with surgery. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is uncertain. However, given the relatively high risk of recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in medically fit patients. Radiation therapy should be considered for those with incompletely resectable tumors and those with inadequate margins.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. e276-e276
Author(s):  
Wanis H. Ibrahim ◽  
Khalid Shariff ◽  
Mufid El Mistiri ◽  
Ussama Alhomsi ◽  
Awni Alshurafa ◽  
...  

Objectives: Qatar has witnessed significant reforms in its health care system, including the care of cancer patients. In 2011, the National Cancer Strategy was released with the aim to deliver a high standard of care to cancer patients across the country. We sought to investigate the featuring trends in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of lung cancer in Qatar following the publication of the National Cancer Strategy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study documenting the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of primary lung cancer cases in Qatar diagnosed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2018. Results: The overall age-standardized incidence rate was 8.7 per 100 000 persons (11.6 per 100 000 and 5.4 per 100 000 persons for males and females, respectively). The one, three, and five-year overall survival rates were 67.0%, 48.0%, and 28.0%, respectively. The three-year overall survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV were 97.0%, 78.0%, 52.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. The three-year survival rates for males and females were 43.0% and 64.0%, respectively (p = 0.029), for Qatari and non-Qatari nationals were 42.0% and 49.0%, respectively (p = 0.252), and for smokers and non-smokers were 39.0% and 69.0%, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). The overall age-standardized mortality rate was 5.5 per 100 000 persons. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type. Conclusions: Despite the low overall lung cancer incidence rate in Qatar, there is a rise in the incidence among females when compared to previous studies. Qatar has favorable five-year lung cancer survival rates compared to many developed and neighboring countries. Policymakers in the country should consider the changing patterns in lung cancer incidence when planning future preventive strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Selin Ünsaler

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of routine bilateral neck dissection on the survival outcomes of supraglottic laryngeal cancer patients with lateralized tumors and clinically negative necks. METHODS: The data of 234 patients surgically treated for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma between January 2000 and September 2014 were retrospectively collected. Patients treated previously for head and neck cancer, patients who could not be contacted, and those with missing data were excluded. Of the remaining 187 patients, 124 patients with early-stage primaries (T1-T2) (116 males, 8 females; mean age: 55.5±9.5 years; range, 33 to 82 years) were included. Age and sex of the patients, site of the primary tumor, TNM stage, type of the neck dissection, length of follow-up, and survival rates were evaluated. The tumors were classified into three groups according to their relationship with the median line of the larynx, and the neck dissections were recorded as unilateral or bilateral. Recurrences and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrences according to tumor site groups (p=0.39). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in 10-year overall survival rates in patient groups according to the tumor site (p=0.072). We found no statistically significant difference in 10-year overall survival rates between the patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral neck dissection (p=0.580). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival analysis of 124 patients with supraglottic carcinoma did not show a survival benefit of elective contralateral neck dissection in lateralized supraglottic cancer with contralateral clinically negative neck.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15509-e15509
Author(s):  
Conceicao Souza Campos ◽  
Joao Victor Salvajoli ◽  
Paulo Eduardo Novaes ◽  
Marcelo Gurgel da Silva

e15509 Background: Locally advanced cervical cancer is a major worldwide health problem. The treatment might include radiotherapy and few trials evaluate the timing of pelvic external irradiation (RT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) in local control and survival rates of these patients as well as the addition of chemotherapy. The objective were to evaluate the overall survival rates in locally advanced cervix cancer patients and determine the clinical and treatment prognostic factors for local control and overall survival rates. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out with 261 patients stage IIIB, 164 patients received 54 Gy RT to the pelvis and 30 Gy HDR without chemotherapy and 97 patients received 54 Gy RT to the pelvis and 30 Gy HDR with weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 IV (CDDP) from August 1998 to June 2004 in Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, a Brazilian northeastern hospital. The mean follow-up time was 50 months (2-185 months) and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival curves. The Cox regression was used to evaluate multivariate analysis and p values =<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Local control and 5-year survival rates were 39.6% and 38.4% for exclusively radiation and 50.5% and 47.4% for chemoradiation (p = 0.19 and p = 0.36, respectively). The mean treatment time was 61 days. Both local control and overall survival rates were affected by age, parametrial involvement and the timing of brachytherapy (p<0.05). The overall treatment time did not influence survival or local control rates (p>0.05). But less than six cycles of chemotherapy improved local control rates better than six or more cycles (55.1% versus 44.9% p = 0.02). Conclusions: The study is a nonsuperiority one where the addition of weekly chemotherapy with six cycles of CDDP 40mg/m2 during the irradiation did not improve overall survival rates. Further prospective studies would be useful to evaluate the benefit of adding weekly chemotherapy to the standard radiotherapy treatment as well as the financial impact of the adoption of this international guideline in patients with advanced lesions from developing countries.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wonkyo Shin ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
Sangyoon Park ◽  
Sokbom Kang ◽  
Myong Cheol Lim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate clinical factors that can help determine the extent of lymphadenectomy required in endometrial cancer patients and confirm the differences of metastatic lymph node regions based on the risk factors for endometrial cancer patients. Methods The medical records of 468 endometrial cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed between January 2006 and December 2018. Patients were categorized into pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and pelvic plus para-aortic lymph nodes dissection (PPALND) groups. Demographics, recurrence-free survival, and 5-year overall survival rates were compared, and the clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median follow-up period was 55 months (range, 6–142 months). The mean age was higher in the PPALND group than in the PLND group (51.0 vs. 54.5 years; P < 0.001). The PPALND group had a higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, lymphovascular invasion, endocervical invasion, and FIGO grade (P = 0.001) than the PLND group. The PPALND group had higher 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates than the PLND group. While comparing lymph node (LN) metastasis confirmed pathologically, the group with confirmed metastasis showed a higher number of high-risk group patients than lymph node-negative patients. However, no difference was observed in pelvic LN metastasis, pelvic plus para-aortic LN metastasis, and isolated para-aortic LN metastasis groups. Conclusions When treating patients with endometrial cancer, risk group evaluation is an important factor for determining LN dissection. Our study found no differences in clinical factors of metastatic LN regions.


Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Norihiro Matsuura ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Makoto Yamasaki ◽  
Kotaro Yamashita ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
...  

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Esophageal cancer patients may simultaneously have resectable esophageal cancer and undiagnosable incidental minute solid pulmonary nodules. While the latter is rarely metastatic, only a few studies have reported on the outcomes of such nodules after surgery. In this retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of such nodules, the probability that they are ultimately metastatic nodules, and the prognosis of patients after esophagectomy according to the metastatic status of the nodules. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data of 398 patients who underwent esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected. We reviewed computed tomography (CT) images from the first visit and searched for incidental minute pulmonary nodules &#x3c;10 mm in size. We followed the outcomes of these nodules and compared the characteristics of metastatic and nonmetastatic nodules. We also assessed the prognosis of patients whose minute pulmonary nodules were metastatic. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the patients who underwent esophagectomy, 149 (37.4%) had one or more minute pulmonary nodules, with a total of 285 nodules. Thirteen (4.6%) of these nodules in 12 (8.1%) patients were ultimately diagnosed as being metastatic. Thirteen (8.7%) patients experienced recurrence at a different location from where the nodules were originally identified. Characteristics of the metastatic nodules were not unique in terms of size, SUVmax, or location in the lungs. Two-year and 5-year overall survival rates of patients whose nodules were metastatic were 64.2 and 32.1%, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The rate of minute pulmonary nodules which were ultimately metastatic was 4.6%. Our findings suggest that esophagectomy followed by the identification of minute pulmonary nodules is an acceptable strategy even if the nodules cannot be diagnosed as being metastatic on the first visit CT due to their small size.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document