scholarly journals Everolimus in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Unknown Primary

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simron Singh ◽  
Carlo Carnaghi ◽  
Roberto Buzzoni ◽  
Rodney F. Pommier ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Gi Tract ◽  
Primary Subgroup ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Prolongation ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Primary Origin ◽  
Unmet Treatment Need

Purpose: The RADIANT-4 randomized phase 3 study demonstrated significant prolongation of median progression-free survival (PFS) with everolimus compared to placebo (11.0 [95% CI 9.2-13.3] vs. 3.9 [95% CI 3.6-7.4] months) in patients with advanced, progressive, nonfunctional gastrointestinal (GI) and lung neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This analysis specifically evaluated NET patients with GI and unknown primary origin. Methods: Patients in the RADIANT-4 trial were randomized 2:1 to everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo. The effect of everolimus on PFS was evaluated in patients with NET of the GI tract or unknown primary site. Results: Of the 302 patients enrolled, 175 had GI NET (everolimus, 118; placebo, 57) and 36 had unknown primary (everolimus, 23; placebo, 13). In the GI subset, the median PFS by central review was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.2-17.3) in the everolimus arm versus 5.4 months (95% CI 3.6-9.3) in the placebo arm; the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.56 (95% CI 0.37-0.84). In the unknown primary patients, the median PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI 4.1-not evaluable) for everolimus versus 7.5 months (95% CI 1.9-18.5) for placebo; the HR was 0.60 (95% CI 0.24-1.51). Everolimus efficacy was also demonstrated in both midgut and non-midgut populations; a 40-46% reduction in the risk of progression or death was reported for patients in the combined GI and unknown primary subgroup. Everolimus had a benefit regardless of prior somatostatin analog therapy. Conclusions: Everolimus showed a clinically meaningful PFS benefit in patients with advanced progressive nonfunctional NET of GI and unknown primary, consistent with the overall RADIANT-4 results, providing an effective new standard treatment option in this patient population and filling an unmet treatment need for these patients.

Efficacy and safety of everolimus in advanced, progressive, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and unknown primary: A subgroup analysis of the phase III RADIANT-4 trial.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simron Singh ◽  
Carlo Carnaghi ◽  
Roberto Buzzoni ◽  
Rodney F. Pommier ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Gi Tract ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

315 Background: In the groundbreaking, phase 3 RCT RADIANT-4 study, everolimus (EVE) significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) by 7.1 mo in patients (pts) with advanced, progressive, nonfunctional NET of GI or lung vs placebo (PBO); HR, 0.48 (95%CI, 0.35-0.67), P<0.00001 [Yao JC et al, ECC-ESMO, 2015]. Methods: InRADIANT-4, pts with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated (G1/G2), nonfunctional GI or lung NET were randomized (2:1) to EVE (10 mg/d) or PBO. In this analysis, pts with NET of GI tract (stomach, colon, rectum, appendix, caecum, ileum, duodenum, jejunum, or small intestine) and unknown primary were included. Results: Of 302 pts, 175 had GI NET (EVE [n=118], PBO [n=57]); 36 had NET of unknown primary (EVE [23], PBO [13]). In GI NET pts, median age was 63 y; females: 55%; G1/G2: 75%/25%; WHO PS: 0, 78% or 1, 22%; Caucasian: 73%. Similar baseline characteristics were observed in pts with NET of unknown primary. Ileum (41%), rectum (23%) and jejunum (13%) were the most common locations in GI subgroup. The table below lists prior treatments. In pts with GI NET, median PFS (95% CI) by central review (EVE vs PBO) was 13.1 (9.2-17.3) mo vs 5.4 (3.6-9.3) mo with an estimated 44% risk-reduction in favor of EVE (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.84). In pts with NET of unknown primary, median PFS (95% CI) by central review (EVE vs PBO) was 13.6 (4.1-not evaluable) mo vs 7.5 (1.9-18.5) mo (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.24-1.51). The most frequent G3/4 adverse events irrespective of drug-relationship reported in ≥5% pts in GI subgroup were diarrhea, hypertension, stomatitis, abdominal pain, fatigue, and acute renal failure. Conclusions: The present subgroup analysis of RADIANT-4 study demonstrated improvement in PFS with EVE for pts with GI NET, and suggests efficacy in NET of unknown primary, with an estimated 40% to 44% risk-reduction in favor of EVE vs PBO. Safety profile for EVE is consistent with that previously reported. Clinical trial information: NCT01524783. [Table: see text]

Single institution experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Heying Duan ◽  
Gaia Ninatti ◽  
Bradley Girod ◽  
Valentina Ferri ◽  
Pamela L. Kunz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Low Toxicity

623 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare but increasing in incidence. The only curative treatment is surgery, which in many cases is not an option due to metastatic disease at diagnosis. The NETTER-1 study showed high efficacy and low toxicity of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for midgut NETs. Here, we present our initial experience with PRRT in the treatment of patients with NET. Methods: Fifty-two patients (27 males and 25 females; 37 - 81 yo, mean ± SD: 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with documented progressive NET (25 pancreas, 17 small intestine, 1 coecum, 4 unknown primary, 3 paragangliomas, and 2 pheochromocytomas) were referred to undergo PRRT at our institution from July 2018 to September 2019. Laboratory tests were obtained at baseline, 1 week before each cycle and every 3 months following treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity were assessed. An interim overall survival (OS) analysis was performed. Results, when possible, were compared with the NETTER-1 trial. Lines of therapy were documented. Results: 22/52 (42%) patients completed all 4 cycles of PRRT. 18/52 (34%) patients are currently being treated. 12/52 (23%) patients had to discontinue treatment. Hematotoxicity was the only side effect which can be related to PRRT. The 6-month and 9-month PFS rate was 82.4% and 66.8% respectively vs. 89% and 84% in the NETTER-1 trial. The ORR was 36% vs. 18% in the NETTER-1 trial. In the interim OS analysis, 6 deaths occurred. In contrast to the NETTER-1 study, PRRT in our patient cohort was performed later in the course of treatment (median lines of therapy before PRRT = 4 ±1.3 (range 1-6)). Conclusions: Our preliminary data show overall good results of PRRT in patients with NETs. However, compared to the NETTER-1 trial, PFS is shorter which is most likely due to the extensive pretreatment, but ORR was higher. [Table: see text]

Comparison of Temozolomide-Capecitabine to 5-Fluorouracile-Dacarbazine in 247 Patients with Advanced Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Propensity Score Analyses

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis de Mestier ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Hedia Brixi ◽  
Camille Evrard ◽  
Jean-Louis Legoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multivariate Regression Model ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Confounding Bias ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Pancreatic Net

Introduction: Although chemotherapy combining 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-dacarbazine (DTIC) or temozolomide (TEM)-capecitabine (CAP) is extensively used in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET), they were never compared. We compared their tolerance and efficacy in advanced NET. Methods: We evaluated the records of consecutive patients with pancreatic or small-intestine advanced NET who received 5FU-DTIC or TEM-CAP between July 2004 and December 2017 in 5 French centers. Tolerance, tumor response and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared. Factors associated with PFS were analyzed using Cox multivariate regression model. To reduce the confounding bias of the nonrandomized design, PFS was compared using propensity score analyses. Results: Ninety-four (5FU-DTIC) patients and 153 (TEM-CAP) patients were included. Pancreatic NET represented 82.3% of cases and 17.1, 61.8 and 10.9% of patients had G1, G2 or G3 NET respectively. Progression at baseline was reported in 92.7% of patients with available data. Grades 3–4 adverse events occurred in 24.7 and 8.5% of TEM-CAP and 5FU-DTIC patients respectively (p = 0.002). The overall response rate was 38.3 and 39.2% respectively (p = 0.596). Median PFS on raw analysis was similar to 5FU-DTIC and TEM-CAP (13.9 vs. 18.3 months, respectively p = 0.86). TEM-CAP was associated with an increased risk of progression on the raw multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, 95% CI [1.32–2.73], p = 0.001) and when adjusted on propensity score (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.18–2.31], p = 0.004). Conclusion: PFS may be longer with 5FU-DTIC than TEM-CAP in patients with advanced NET. Although patients often prefer oral chemotherapy, 5FU-DTIC is a relevant alternative. A randomized comparison is needed to confirm these results.

scholarly journals A Novel Epigenetic Machine Learning Model to Define Risk of Progression for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1075
Author(s):  
Luca Bedon ◽  
Michele Dal Bo ◽  
Monica Mossenta ◽  
Davide Busato ◽  
Giuseppe Toffoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Risk Patients

Although extensive advancements have been made in treatment against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis of HCC patients remains unsatisfied. It is now clearly established that extensive epigenetic changes act as a driver in human tumors. This study exploits HCC epigenetic deregulation to define a novel prognostic model for monitoring the progression of HCC. We analyzed the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of 374 primary tumor specimens using the Illumina 450 K array data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We initially used a novel combination of Machine Learning algorithms (Recursive Features Selection, Boruta) to capture early tumor progression features. The subsets of probes obtained were used to train and validate Random Forest models to predict a Progression Free Survival greater or less than 6 months. The model based on 34 epigenetic probes showed the best performance, scoring 0.80 accuracy and 0.51 Matthews Correlation Coefficient on testset. Then, we generated and validated a progression signature based on 4 methylation probes capable of stratifying HCC patients at high and low risk of progression. Survival analysis showed that high risk patients are characterized by a poorer progression free survival compared to low risk patients. Moreover, decision curve analysis confirmed the strength of this predictive tool over conventional clinical parameters. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted that high risk patients differentiated themselves by the upregulation of proliferative pathways. Ultimately, we propose the oncogenic MCM2 gene as a methylation-driven gene of which the representative epigenetic markers could serve both as predictive and prognostic markers. Briefly, our work provides several potential HCC progression epigenetic biomarkers as well as a new signature that may enhance patients surveillance and advances in personalized treatment.

scholarly journals FAS and Subsequent Therapies in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. Rogers ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Cecile G. Dagohoy ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

We evaluated outcomes of treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and streptozocin (FAS) in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and its impact on subsequent therapy (everolimus or temozolomide). Advanced PanNET patients treated at our center from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2), streptozocin (400 mg/m2) (both IV, days 1-5) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 IV, day 1) every 28 days. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. Of 243 eligible patients, 220 were evaluable for ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Most (90%) had metastatic, nonfunctional PanNETs; 14% had prior therapy. ORR to FAS was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-48%). Median follow-up was 61 months. Median PFS was 20 (95% CI: 15-23) months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 (95% CI: 60-71) months. Cox regression analyses suggested improvement with first-line vs subsequent lines of FAS therapy. Main adverse events ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (10%) and nausea/vomiting (5.5%). Dose reductions were required in 32% of patients. Post-FAS everolimus (n=108; 68% second line) had a median PFS of 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months. Post-FAS temozolomide (n=60; 53% > fourth line) had an ORR of 13% and median PFS of 5.2 (95% CI: 4-12) months. In this largest reported cohort of PanNETs treated with chemotherapy, FAS demonstrated activity without significant safety concerns. FAS did not appear to affect subsequent PFS with everolimus; this sequence is being evaluated prospectively. Responses were noted with subsequent temozolomide-based regimens although PFS was possibly limited by line of therapy.

scholarly journals Prognostic Threshold for Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Pancreatic and Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalvinder Mandair ◽  
Mohid S Khan ◽  
Andre Lopes ◽  
Luke Furtado O’Mahony ◽  
Leah Ensell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Optimum Threshold

Abstract Background Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are detectable in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and are accurate prognostic markers although the optimum threshold has not been defined. Objective This work aims to define optimal prognostic CTC thresholds in PanNET and midgut NETs. Patients and Methods CellSearch was used to enumerate CTCs in 199 patients with metastatic pancreatic (PanNET) (90) or midgut NETs (109). Patients were followed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for a minimum of 3 years or until death. Results The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for progression at 12 months in PanNETs and midgut NETs identified the optimal CTC threshold as 1 or greater and 2 or greater, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, these thresholds were predictive for 12-month progression with an odds ratio (OR) of 6.69 (P &lt; .01) for PanNETs and 5.88 (P &lt; .003) for midgut NETs. The same thresholds were found to be optimal for predicting death at 36 months, with an OR of 2.87 (P &lt; .03) and 5.09 (P &lt; .005) for PanNETs and midgut NETs, respectively. In multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis for PFS in PanNETs, 1 or greater CTC had a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.6 (P &lt; .01), whereas 2 or greater CTCs had an HR of 2.25 (P &lt; .01) in midgut NETs. In multivariate analysis OS in PanNETs, 1 or greater CTCs had an HR of 3.16 (P &lt; .01) and in midgut NETs, 2 or greater CTCs had an HR of 1.73 (P &lt; .06). Conclusions The optimal CTC threshold to predict PFS and OS in metastatic PanNETs and midgut NETs is 1 and 2, respectively. These thresholds can be used to stratify patients in clinical practice and clinical trials.

scholarly journals 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Apurva Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

Association of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in a real-world cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Umang Swami ◽  
Taylor Ryan McFarland ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
Adam Kessel ◽  
Roberto Nussenzveig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
The Relationship

59 Background: In mCSPC, baseline CTC counts have been shown to correlate with PSA responses and progression free survival (PFS) in small studies in the context of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) without modern intensification with docetaxel or novel hormonal therapy. Similar correlation of CTC count with PSA responses and PFS was recently reported from an ongoing phase 3 trial in mCSPC setting (SWOG1216) without reporting the association in the context of ADT intensification. Furthermore, none of these studies correlated CTCs with overall survival (OS). Herein we evaluated whether CTCs were associated with outcomes including OS in a real world mCPSC population treated with intensified as well as non-intensified ADT. Methods: Eligibility criteria: new mCSPC receiving ADT with or without intensification and enumeration of baseline CTCs by FDA cleared Cell Search CTC assay. The relationship between CTC counts (categorized as: 0, 1-4, and ≥5/7.5 ml) and both PFS and OS was assessed in the context of Cox proportional hazards models, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, Gleason, PSA at ADT initiation, de novo vs. non-de novo status, and ADT intensification vs. non-intensification therapy. Results: Overall 99 pts were identified. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table. In unadjusted analyses, CTC counts of ≥5 as compared to 0 were strongly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.85-6.18; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 4.44 95% CI 1.63-12.10; p = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, CTC counts of ≥5 as compared to 0 continued to be associated with inferior PFS (HR 5.49, 95% CI 2.64-11.43; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 4.00, 95% CI 1.31-12.23; p = 0.015). Within the ADT intensification subgroup also, high CTC counts were associated with poor PFS and OS. For PFS, the univariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 4.87 (95% CI 1.66-14.30; p = 0.004) and multivariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 7.43 (95% CI 1.92-28.82; p = 0.004). For OS, the univariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 15.88 (95% CI 1.93-130.58; p = 0.010) and multivariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 24.86 (95% CI 2.03-304.45; p = 0.012). Conclusions: To best of our knowledge this is the first study to show that high baseline CTC counts are strongly associated with inferior PFS as well as OS in pts with newly diagnosed mCSPC, even in those who received intensified ADT therapy. Identifying these pts at highest risk of progression and death can help with counselling and prognostication in clinics as well as design and enrollment in future clinical trials. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus in Adult Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMO.S7319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Oberstein ◽  
M. Wasif Saif
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Significant Advance ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
To Receive

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a diverse family of tumors which are derived from the neuroendocrine system. Most NETs are well or moderately differentiated tumors with a relatively indolent growth pattern. However, these tumors can cause significant clinical disease due to release of functional products that mediate the carcinoid syndrome and other diverse sequela. They also can grow progressively and cause symptoms from local invasion or distant metastasis. NETs are optimally treated with surgery and somatosatin analogs (SSAs) to control symptoms but are relatively insensitive to systemic chemotherapy. As a result, patients with advanced unresectable NETs have a poor prognosis. In 2011, two targeted therapies, sunitinib and everolimus were approved in the subset of progressive pancreatic NETs (pNETs). Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of the growth stimulatory mTOR pathway. In Phase 2 trials in NETs and pNETs, everolimus was well tolerated and associated with some response and widespread disease stabilization. In follow-up, randomized Phase 3 trials, everolimus was compared to placebo. In the RADIANT-2 trial, everolimus and a somatostatin analog were used in patients with functional NETs and treatment was associated with an an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). In the RADIANT-3 trial, patients with pNET were randomized to receive everolimus or placebo along with best supportive care. Everolimus was again associated with improvement in PFS compared to placebo and it has been approved by the FDA for patients with progressive pNET. Everolimus is associated with frequent low grade toxicity but is also notable for increased rates of infection as well as non-infectious pneumonitis. mTOR inhibition with everolimus represents a significant advance in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document