scholarly journals Examining Hospital Variation on Multiple Indicators of Stroke Quality of Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Jiming Fang ◽  
Bing Yu ◽  
Moira K. Kapral
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Provider Profiling ◽  
Multiple Indicators ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Multivariate Response ◽  
Hospital Variation ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background: Provider profiling involves comparing the performance of hospitals on indicators of quality of care. Typically, provider profiling examines the performance of hospitals on each quality indicator in isolation. Consequently, one cannot formally examine whether hospitals that have poor performance on one indicator also have poor performance on a second indicator. Methods: We used Bayesian multivariate response random effects logistic regression model to simultaneously examine variation and covariation in multiple binary indicators across hospitals. We considered 7 binary patient-level indicators of quality of care for patients presenting to hospital with a diagnosis of acute stroke. We examined between-hospital variation in these 7 indicators across 86 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Results: The number of patients eligible for each indicator ranged from 1321 to 14 079. There were 7 pairs of indicators for which there was a strong correlation between a hospital’s performance on each of the 2 indicators. Twenty-nine of the 86 hospitals had a probability higher than 0.90 of having worse performance than average on at least 4 of the 7 indicators. Seven of the 86 of hospitals had a probability higher than 0.90 of having worse performance than average on at least 5 indicators. Fourteen of the 86 of hospitals had a probability higher than 0.50 of having worse performance than average on at least 6 indicators. No hospitals had a probability higher than 0.50 of having worse performance than average on all 7 indicators. Conclusions: These findings suggest that there are a small number of hospitals that perform poorly on at least half of the quality indicators, and that certain indicators tend to cluster together. The described methods allow for targeting quality improvement initiatives at these hospitals.

The ENT emergency clinic: does senior input matter?

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mirza ◽  
L McClelland ◽  
M Daniel ◽  
N Jones
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Operating Theatre ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
Discharge Rates ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Number Of Patients

AbstractBackground:Many ENT conditions can be treated in the emergency clinic on an ambulatory basis. Our clinic traditionally had been run by foundation year two and specialty trainee doctors (period one). However, with perceived increasing inexperience, a dedicated registrar was assigned to support the clinic (period two). This study compared admission and discharge rates for periods one and two to assess if greater registrar input affected discharge rate; an increase in discharge rate was used as a surrogate marker of efficiency.Method:Data was collected prospectively for patients seen in the ENT emergency clinic between 1 August 2009 and 31 July 2011. Time period one included data from patients seen between 1 August 2009 and 31 July 2010, and time period two included data collected between 1 August 2010 and 31 July 2011.Results:The introduction of greater registrar support increased the number of patients that were discharged, and led to a reduction in the number of children requiring the operating theatre.Conclusion:The findings, which were determined using clinic outcomes as markers of the quality of care, highlighted the benefits of increasing senior input within the ENT emergency clinic.

scholarly journals Pain management after lung surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Frödin ◽  
Margareta Warrén Stomberg
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Lung Surgery ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Severe Postoperative Pain

Pain management is an integral challenge in nursing and includes the responsibility of managing patients’ pain, evaluating pain therapy and ensuring the quality of care. The aims of this study were to explore patients’ experiences of pain after lung surgery and evaluate their satisfaction with the postoperative pain management. A descriptive design was used which studied 51 participants undergoing lung surgery. The incidence of moderate postoperative pain varied from 36- 58% among the participants and severe pain from 11-26%, during their hospital stay. Thirty-nine percent had more pain than expected. After three months, 20% experienced moderate pain and 4% experienced severe pain, while after six months, 16% experienced moderate pain. The desired quality of care goal was not fully achieved. We conclude that a large number of patients experienced moderate and severe postoperative pain and more than one third had more pain than expected. However, 88% were satisfied with the pain management. The findings confirm the severity of pain experienced after lung surgery and facilitate the apparent need for the continued improvement of postoperative pain management following this procedure.

scholarly journals Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. E. Ceyisakar ◽  
N. van Leeuwen ◽  
Diederik W. J. Dippel ◽  
Ewout W. Steyerberg ◽  
H. F. Lingsma
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
Efficiency Gain ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Dichotomous Outcomes ◽  
Ordinal Outcome

Abstract Background There is a growing interest in assessment of the quality of hospital care, based on outcome measures. Many quality of care comparisons rely on binary outcomes, for example mortality rates. Due to low numbers, the observed differences in outcome are partly subject to chance. We aimed to quantify the gain in efficiency by ordinal instead of binary outcome analyses for hospital comparisons. We analyzed patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke as examples. Methods We sampled patients from two trials. We simulated ordinal and dichotomous outcomes based on the modified Rankin Scale (stroke) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (TBI) in scenarios with and without true differences between hospitals in outcome. The potential efficiency gain of ordinal outcomes, analyzed with ordinal logistic regression, compared to dichotomous outcomes, analyzed with binary logistic regression was expressed as the possible reduction in sample size while keeping the same statistical power to detect outliers. Results In the IMPACT study (9578 patients in 265 hospitals, mean number of patients per hospital = 36), the analysis of the ordinal scale rather than the dichotomized scale (‘unfavorable outcome’), allowed for up to 32% less patients in the analysis without a loss of power. In the PRACTISE trial (1657 patients in 12 hospitals, mean number of patients per hospital = 138), ordinal analysis allowed for 13% less patients. Compared to mortality, ordinal outcome analyses allowed for up to 37 to 63% less patients. Conclusions Ordinal analyses provide the statistical power of substantially larger studies which have been analyzed with dichotomization of endpoints. We advise to exploit ordinal outcome measures for hospital comparisons, in order to increase efficiency in quality of care measurements. Trial registration We do not report the results of a health care intervention.

scholarly journals Quality of Care in Long-Term Hemodialysis Patients in Mexico

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Torres-Díaz JA ◽  
◽  
Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG ◽  
Zúniga-Hernández JA ◽  
Olivo-Gutiérrez MC ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
World Literature ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Cross Sectional

Introduction: The End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in Mexico. The quality of care these patients receive remains uncertain. Methods: This is a descriptive, single-center and cross-sectional cohort study. The KDOQI performance measures, hemoglobin level >11 g/dL, blood pressure <140/90 mmHg, serum albumin >4 g/dL and use of arteriovenous fistula of patients with ESRD on hemodialysis were analyzed in a period of a year. The association between mortality and the KDOQI objectives was evaluated with a logistic regression model. A linear regression model was also performed with the number of readmissions. Results: A total of 124 participants were included. Participants were categorized by the number of measures completed. Fourteen (11.3%) of the participants did not meet any of the goals, 51 (41.1%) met one, 43 (34.7%) met two, 11 (8.9%) met three, and 5 (4%) met the four clinical goals analyzed. A mortality of 11.2% was registered. In the logistic regression model, the number of goals met had an OR for mortality of 1.1 (95% CI 0.5-2.8). In the linear regression model, for the number of readmissions, a beta correlation with the number of KDOQI goals met was 0.246 (95% CI -0.872-1.365). Conclusion: The attainment of clinical goals and the mortality rate in our center is similar to that reported in the world literature. Our study did not find a significant association between compliance with clinical guidelines and mortality or the number of hospital admissions in CKD patients on hemodialysis.

Abstract W P287: Does Comprehensive Stroke Certification Demonstrate a Significant Effect on Volume and Quality of Care?

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Paletz ◽  
Shlee Song ◽  
Nili Steiner ◽  
Betty Robertson ◽  
Nicole Wolber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Joint Commission ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

Introduction/Background information: At the onset of acute stroke symptoms, speed, capability, safety and skill are essential-lost minutes can be the difference between full recoveries, poor outcome, or even death. The Joint Commission's Certificate of Distinction for Comprehensive Stroke Centers recognizes centers that make exceptional efforts to foster better outcomes for stroke care. While many hospitals have been surveyed, Cedars Sinai was the 5 th hospital in the nation to receive this certification. Researchable question: Does Comprehensive stroke certification (CSC) demonstrate a significant effect on volume and quality of care? Methods: We assembled a cross-functional, multidisciplinary expert team representing all departments and skill sets involved in treating stroke patients. We carefully screened eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke We assessed the number of patients treated at Cedars-Sinai with IV-T-pa t 6 months before and then 6 months after CSC and the quality of their care including medical treatment and door to needle time. Results: In the 6 months prior to Joint Commissions Stroke Certification we treated 20 of 395acute stroke patients with t-PA with an average CT turnaround time of 31±19minutes and an average Door to needle time (DTNT) of 68±32minutes. In the 6 months since Joint Commission Stroke Certification we have increased the number of acute stroke patients treated by almost double. There were 37 out of 489(P=0.02, Chi Square) patients treated with IV t-PA with an average CT turnaround time of 22±7minutes (p=0.08, t-test, compared to pre-CSC) and an average DTNT of 61± 23minutes (not different than pre-CSC). Conclusion: We conclude that Joint Commission Certification for stroke was associated with an increased rate of treatment with IV rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke patients. We were not able to document an effect on quality of care. Further studies of the impact of CSC certification are warranted.

scholarly journals LO68: Patterns and predictors of emergency physician productivity

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S30-S31
Author(s):  
S. Campbell ◽  
S. Weerasinghe
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Workload Measurement ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Return Visits

Introduction: Emergency Physician (EP) performance comprises both quality of care and quantity of patients seen in a set time. Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding increases the importance of the ability of EPs to see patients as rapidly as is safely possible. Maximizing efficiency requires an understanding of variables that are associated with individual physician performance. While using the incidence of return visits within 48 hours as a quality measure is controversial, repeat visits do consume ED resources. Methods: We analysed the practice variables of 85 EPs working at a single academic ED, for the period from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2017, using data from an emergency department information system (EDIS). Variables analysed included: number of shifts worked, number of patients seen per hour (pt/hr), an adjusted workload measurement (assigning a higher score to CTAS 1-3 patients), percentage of patients whose care involved an ED learner, and the percentage of patients who returned to the ED within 48 hours of ED discharge. Resource utilization was measured by percentage of diagnostic imaging (ultra sound (US), CT scan (CT), x-ray (XR)) ordered and percentage of patients referred to consulting services. We performed principal component analyses to identify bench marks of resource use, demographic (age, EM qualification, gender) and other practice related predictors of performances. Results: Mean pt/hr differed significantly by EM Qualification for CTAS 2-4, with 1.71/hr (95% Confidence Interval=1.63-1.77) by FRCPS physicians, compared to 1.89/hr by CCFP(EM) (CI=1.81-1.97). There were no differences for CTAS 1 and 5. Other variables associated with a significantly lower pt/hr, included a greater use of imaging, (CT: p=0.0003, XR: p=0.0008) although this was did not reach statistical significance with US (p=0.06%). Female gender, older age, number of patient consultations for CTAS 3 and more patients seen by a learner were all associated with lower pt/hr. Pt/hr was a better predictor (R2=45%) for EP resource utilization than adjusted workload measurement (R2 =35%). Higher use of CT was associated with fewer return visits in <48 hrs (0.13% lower). Male gender, younger age, number of patient consultation for CTAS 3 and fewer patients seen by a learner were all associated with an increase in return visits. Conclusion: We found a significant difference in pt/hr rates and return visits within 48 hours between EPs with different age ranges, gender, and EM certification. Increased use of CT scan and x-ray, and consultation for patients CTAS 3 were associated with lower pt/hr. Return visit rates also varied in association with diagnostic imagine use, age, gender and number of patients seen by a learner. Further research is needed to assess the association with these variables on quality of care.

Anticancer therapy within the last 30 days of life: Results of an audit and re-audit cycle from a regional cancer center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18260-e18260
Author(s):  
Mike Nguyen ◽  
Alysson Wann ◽  
Babak Tamjid ◽  
Arvind Sahu ◽  
Javier Torres
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Quality Improvement Intervention ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Audit Period ◽  
Improvement Intervention

e18260 Background: The therapeutic landscape in medical oncology continues to expand significantly. Newer therapies, especially immunotherapy, offer the hope of profound and durable responses with more tolerable side effect profiles. Integrating this information into the decision making process is challenging for patients and oncologists. Systemic anticancer treatment within the last thirty days of life is a key quality of care indicator and is one parameter used in the assessment of aggressiveness of care. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of all patients previously treated at Goulburn Valley Health oncology department who died between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2018 was conducted. Information collected related to patient demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and hospital care within the last 30 days of life. These results were presented to a hospital meeting and a quality improvement intervention program instituted. A second retrospective review of medical records of all patients who died between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018 was conducted in order to measure the effect of this intervention. Results: The initial audit period comprised 440 patients. 120 patients (27%) received treatment within the last 30 days of life. The re-audit period comprised 75 patients. 19 patients (25%) received treatment within the last 30 days of life. Treatment rates of chemotherapy reduced after the intervention in contrast to treatment rates of immunotherapy which increased. A separate analysis calculated the rate of mortality within 30 days of chemotherapy from the total number of patients who received chemotherapy was initially 8% and 2% in the re-audit period. Treatment within the last 30 days of life was associated with higher use of aggressive care such as emergency department presentation, hospitalisation, ICU admission and late hospice referral. Palliative care referral rates improved after the intervention. Conclusions: This audit demonstrated that a quality improvement intervention can impact quality of care indicators with reductions in the use of chemotherapy within the last 30 days of life. However, immunotherapy use increased which may be explained by increased access and perceived better tolerability.

scholarly journals Prospective cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their relatives on the experienced quality of care and life (eQuiPe study): a study protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke van Roij ◽  
◽  
Myrte Zijlstra ◽  
Laurien Ham ◽  
Linda Brom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Palliative care is becoming increasingly important because the number of patients with an incurable disease is growing and their survival is improving. Previous research tells us that early palliative care has the potential to improve quality of life (QoL) in patients with advanced cancer and their relatives. According to limited research on palliative care in the Netherlands, patients with advanced cancer and their relatives find current palliative care suboptimal. The aim of the eQuiPe study is to understand the experienced quality of care (QoC) and QoL of patients with advanced cancer and their relatives to further improve palliative care. Methods A prospective longitudinal observational cohort study is conducted among patients with advanced cancer and their relatives. Patients and relatives receive a questionnaire every 3 months regarding experienced QoC and QoL during the palliative trajectory. Bereaved relatives receive a final questionnaire 3 to 6 months after the patients’ death. Data from questionnaires are linked with detailed clinical data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). By means of descriptive statistics we will examine the experienced QoC and QoL in our study population. Differences between subgroups and changes over time will be assessed while adjusting for confounding factors. Discussion This study will be the first to prospectively and longitudinally explore experienced QoC and QoL in patients with advanced cancer and their relatives simultaneously. This study will provide us with population-based information in patients with advanced cancer and their relatives including changes over time. Results from the study will inform us on how to further improve palliative care. Trial registration Trial NL6408 (NTR6584). Registered in Netherlands Trial Register on June 30, 2017.

Quality of dying of nursing home residents with dementia as judged by relatives

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1697-1707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole van Uden ◽  
Lieve Van den Block ◽  
Jenny T. van der Steen ◽  
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen ◽  
An Vandervoort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Quality Of Dying ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Number Of Patients

ABSTRACTBackground:Providing good quality care for the growing number of patients with dementia is a major challenge. There is little international comparative research on how people with dementia die in nursing homes. We compared the relative's judgment on quality of care at the end of life and quality of dying of nursing home residents with dementia in Belgium and the Netherlands.Methods:This was a Belgian cross-sectional retrospective study (2010) combined with a prospective and retrospective study from the Netherlands (January 2007–July 2011). Relatives of deceased residents of 69 Belgian and 34 Dutch nursing homes were asked to complete questionnaires. We included 190 and 337 deceased nursing home residents with dementia in Belgium and the Netherlands, respectively.Results:Of all identified deceased nursing home residents with dementia, respectively 53.2% and 74.8% of their relatives in Belgium and the Netherlands responded. Comfort while dying (CAD-EOLD, range 14–42) was rated better for Dutch nursing home residents than for Belgian nursing homes residents (26.1 vs. 31.1, OR 4.5, CI 1.8–11.2). We found no differences between countries regarding Satisfaction With Care (SWC-EOLD, range 10–40, means 32.5 (the Netherlands) and 32.0 (Belgium)) or symptom frequency in the last month of life (SM-EOLD, range 0–45, means 26.4 (the Netherlands) and 27.2 (Belgium)).Conclusion:Although nursing home structures differ between Belgium and the Netherlands, the quality of care in the last month of life for residents with dementia is similar according to their relatives. However, Dutch residents experience less discomfort while dying. The results suggest room for improved symptom management in both countries and particularly in the dying phase in Belgium.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document