scholarly journals Greater Acculturation is Associated With Poorer Cardiovascular Health in the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Author(s):  
Olatokunbo Osibogun ◽  
Oluseye Ogunmoroti ◽  
Lena Mathews ◽  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Martin Tibuakuu ◽  
...  

Background Greater acculturation is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about the association between acculturation and ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) as measured by the American Heart Association's 7 CVH metrics. We investigated the association between acculturation and ideal CVH among a multi‐ethnic cohort of US adults free of clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline. Methods and Results This was a cross‐sectional analysis of 6506 men and women aged 45 to 84 years of 4 races/ethnicities. We examined measures of acculturation(birthplace, language spoken at home, and years lived in the United States [foreign‐born participants]) by CVH score. Scores of 0 to 8 indicate inadequate, 9 to 10 average and 11 to 14 optimal CVH. We used multivariable regression to examine associations between acculturation and CVH, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income and health insurance. The mean (SD) age was 62 (10) years, 53% were women, 39% non‐Hispanic White‐, 26% non‐Hispanic Black‐, 12% Chinese‐ and 22% Hispanic‐Americans. US‐born participants had lower odds of optimal CVH (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63 [0.50–0.79], P <0.001) compared with foreign‐born participants. Participants who spoke Chinese and other foreign languages at home had greater odds of optimal CVH compared with those who spoke English (1.91 [1.08–3.36], P =0.03; and 1.65 [1.04–2.63], P =0.03, respectively). Foreign‐born participants who lived the longest in the United States had lower odds of optimal CVH (0.62 [0.43–0.91], P =0.02). Conclusions Greater US acculturation was associated with poorer CVH. This finding suggests that the promotion of ideal CVH should be encouraged among immigrant populations since more years lived in the United States was associated with poorer CVH.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quentin R Youmans ◽  
Megan E McCabe ◽  
Clyde W Yancy ◽  
Lucia Petito ◽  
Kiarri N Kershaw ◽  
...  

Introduction: Social determinants of health are multi-dimensional and span various interrelated domains. In order to inform community-engaged clinical and policy efforts, we sought to examine the association between a national social vulnerability index (SVI) and age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) of CVD. Hypothesis: Higher county-level SVI or greater vulnerability will be associated with higher AAMR of CVD between 1999-2018 in the United States. Methods: In this serial, cross-sectional analysis, we queried CDC WONDER for age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 population for cardiovascular disease (I00-78) at the county-level between 1999-2018. We quantified the association of county-level SVI and CVD AAMR using Spearman correlation coefficients and examined trends in CVD AAMR stratified by median SVI at the county-level. Finally, we performed geospatial county-level analysis stratified by combined median SVI and CVD AAMR (high/high, high/low, low/high, and low/low). Results: We included data from 2766 counties (representing 95% of counties in the US) with median SVI 0.53 (IQR 0.28, 0.76). Overall SVI and the household and socioeconomic subcomponents were strongly correlated with 2018 CVD AAMR (0.47, 0.50, and 0.56, respectively with p<0.001 for all). CVD mortality declined between 1999-2011 and was stagnant between 2011-2018 with similar patterns in high and low SVI counties (FIGURE). Counties with high SVI and CVD AAMR were clustered in the South and Midwest (n=977, 35%). Conclusion: County-level social vulnerability is associated with higher CVD mortality. High SVI and CVD AAMR coexist in more than 1 in 3 US counties and have persisted over the past 2 decades. Identifying counties that are disproportionately vulnerable may inform targeted and community-based strategies to equitably improve cardiovascular health across the country.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatokunbo Osibogun ◽  
Oluseye Ogunmoroti ◽  
Lena Mathews ◽  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Martin Tibuakuu ◽  
...  

Background: Greater acculturation is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, little is known about the association between acculturation and ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) as measured by the American Heart Association’s Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) metric. We investigated the association between acculturation and ideal CVH among a multi-ethnic cohort of United States (US) adults free of clinical CVD at baseline. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of 6,506 adults aged 45-84 years from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. The independent variables were measures of acculturation [birthplace, language spoken at home and years lived in the US (foreign-born participants)]. The primary dependent variable was the CVH score derived from the LS7 metrics and the total CVH score ranged from 0-14 points. Scores of 0-8 indicate inadequate, 9-10 average and 11-14 optimal CVH. We used multivariable logistic and multiple linear regression models to examine the association between acculturation and CVH, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income and health insurance. Results: The mean age (SD) was 62 (10) years and 53% were women. US-born participants had lower odds of having optimal CVH scores [prevalence odds ratio (POR) 0.63 (0.50-0.79), Table ] compared to foreign-born participants. Participants who spoke Chinese and other foreign languages at home had higher odds of having optimal CVH compared to those who spoke English [POR 1.91 (1.08-3.36) & 1.65 (1.04-2.63), respectively]. Among foreign-born participants, years lived in the US was associated with a decrease in CVH score [β coefficient -0.01 (-0.02, -0.01)]. Conclusion: Greater US acculturation was associated with poorer CVH. This finding suggests that promotion of ideal CVH should be encouraged among immigrant populations since more years lived in the US is associated with a decline in CVH score.


Author(s):  
Ellen Boakye ◽  
Garima Sharma ◽  
S. Michelle Ogunwole ◽  
Sammy Zakaria ◽  
Arthur J. Vaught ◽  
...  

Background: Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in the United States. It disproportionately affects non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women, but little is known about how preeclampsia and other cardiovascular disease risk factors vary among different subpopulations of NHB women in the United States. We investigated the prevalence of preeclampsia by nativity (US born versus foreign born) and duration of US residence among NHB women. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Boston Birth Cohort (1998–2016), with a focus on NHB women. We performed multivariable logistic regression to investigate associations between preeclampsia, nativity, and duration of US residence after controlling for potential confounders. Results: Of 2697 NHB women, 40.5% were foreign born. Relative to them, US-born NHB women were younger, in higher percentage current smokers, had higher prevalence of obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ) and maternal stress, but lower educational level. The age-adjusted prevalence of preeclampsia was 12.4% and 9.1% among US-born and foreign-born women, respectively. When further categorized by duration of US residence, the prevalence of all studied cardiovascular disease risk factors except for diabetes was lower among foreign-born NHB women with <10 versus ≥10 years of US residence. Additionally, the odds of preeclampsia in foreign-born NHB women with duration of US residence <10 years was 37% lower than in US-born NHB women. In contrast, the odds of preeclampsia in foreign-born NHB women with duration of US residence ≥10 years was not significantly different from that of US-born NHB women after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions: The prevalence of preeclampsia and other cardiovascular disease risk factors is lower in foreign-born than in US-born NHB women. The healthy immigrant effect, which typically results in health advantages for foreign-born women, appears to wane with longer duration of US residence (≥10 years). Further research is needed to better understand these associations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S194-S194
Author(s):  
Shylah M Moore-Pardo ◽  
Anteneh Addisu ◽  
Tea Reljic ◽  
Sadaf Aslam ◽  
Beata Casanas

Abstract Background Although the rate of tuberculosis (TB) has significantly declined in the United States, elimination has plateaued. Florida is one of the states with the greatest number of cases. The majority of cases occur in foreign-born individuals. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is also a major contributor. HIV-TB coinfection leads to reciprocal interactions with significant clinical impact. We aim to compare the risk factors, clinical findings, and outcomes among HIV-infected vs. HIV uninfected patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study of TB cases over a 5 year period (2012–2017) was conducted. All patients with HIV co-infection with age- and gender-matched HIV negative controls were included. The diagnosis of TB was made via clinical, microbiological, radiological, and/or PCR based methods. SPSS was used for statistical data analysis. Results A total of 411 TB cases were identified and 66 patients (33 HIV-infected plus 33 HIV un-infected) were eligible for inclusion. The median age was 49 years (range 22–70). The male to female ratio was 21:12 and 50% of patients had TB symptoms; the rest had abnormal imaging or lab finding. Cases were confirmed via positive sputum smear, culture, or PCR (Figures 1–3). Only 11 patients were lost to follow-up, thus 83.3% completed therapy. A total of 5 persons died (Table 1). Conclusion The rate of HIV-TB coinfection in the United States was 5.3% in 2018; higher among injection drugs users, homeless persons, inmates, and alcoholics. In our study, the rate of HIV-TB coinfection was slightly higher (8%). The difference was not statistically significant in regards to foreign born, homelessness, and incarceration. Only 3 patients admitted to injection drug use and 9 used alcohol (all HIV negative). Traditionally, HIV-TB coinfected patients have extra-pulmonary TB with higher rates of negative sputum and are at increased risk of death. In our cohort, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.009) only for cavitary TB (predominated in HIV un-infected) but no difference in outcomes was observed between the two groups. These findings suggest changing trends in HIV-TB coinfection which may be partly related to our setting and demographics but may be attributed to better access to care and antiretroviral therapy at large. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangbo Sun ◽  
Buyun Liu ◽  
Shuang Rong ◽  
Yang Du ◽  
Guifeng Xu ◽  
...  

Background Food insecurity is a global leading public health challenge that affects not only developing countries but also developed countries, including the United States. About 50 million Americans are food insecure. In this study we examined the associations of the adult food insecurity with all‐cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Methods and Results We included 27 188 US adults (age ≥40 years of age) who participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2014. Food insecurity status was assessed using the Food Security Survey Module developed by the US Department of Agriculture. Mortality from all causes and cardovascular disease was ascertained through data linkage to the National Death Index through December 31, 2015. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with sampling weights to estimate hazard ratios ( HR s) and 95% CIs of all‐cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, according to food security status. During 205 389 person‐years of the period, 5039 deaths occurred, including 1084 cardiovascular disease deaths. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and dietary and lifestyle factors, participants with very low food security had higher risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, with multivariable‐adjusted HR s of 1.32 (95% CI , 1.07–1.62), and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.04–2.26), respectively, compared with those with high food security. Conclusions Food insecurity is significantly associated with increased risk of excess death from cardiovascular disease and all causes in US adults.


Author(s):  
Xiao Wu ◽  
Rachel C Nethery ◽  
M Benjamin Sabath ◽  
Danielle Braun ◽  
Francesca Dominici

AbstractObjectivesUnited States government scientists estimate that COVID-19 may kill tens of thousands of Americans. Many of the pre-existing conditions that increase the risk of death in those with COVID-19 are the same diseases that are affected by long-term exposure to air pollution. We investigated whether long-term average exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 death in the United States.DesignA nationwide, cross-sectional study using county-level data.Data sourcesCOVID-19 death counts were collected for more than 3,000 counties in the United States (representing 98% of the population) up to April 22, 2020 from Johns Hopkins University, Center for Systems Science and Engineering Coronavirus Resource Center.Main outcome measuresWe fit negative binomial mixed models using county-level COVID-19 deaths as the outcome and county-level long-term average of PM2.5 as the exposure. In the main analysis, we adjusted by 20 potential confounding factors including population size, age distribution, population density, time since the beginning of the outbreak, time since state’s issuance of stay-at-home order, hospital beds, number of individuals tested, weather, and socioeconomic and behavioral variables such as obesity and smoking. We included a random intercept by state to account for potential correlation in counties within the same state. We conducted more than 68 additional sensitivity analyses.ResultsWe found that an increase of only 1 μg/m3 in PM2.5 is associated with an 8% increase in the COVID-19 death rate (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 15%). The results were statistically significant and robust to secondary and sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsA small increase in long-term exposure to PM2.5 leads to a large increase in the COVID-19 death rate. Despite the inherent limitations of the ecological study design, our results underscore the importance of continuing to enforce existing air pollution regulations to protect human health both during and after the COVID-19 crisis. The data and code are publicly available so our analyses can be updated routinely.Summary BoxWhat is already known on this topicLong-term exposure to PM2.5 is linked to many of the comorbidities that have been associated with poor prognosis and death in COVID-19 patients, including cardiovascular and lung disease.PM2.5 exposure is associated with increased risk of severe outcomes in patients with certain infectious respiratory diseases, including influenza, pneumonia, and SARS.Air pollution exposure is known to cause inflammation and cellular damage, and evidence suggests that it may suppress early immune response to infection.What this study addsThis is the first nationwide study of the relationship between historical exposure to air pollution exposure and COVID-19 death rate, relying on data from more than 3,000 counties in the United States. The results suggest that long-term exposure to PM2.5 is associated with higher COVID-19 mortality rates, after adjustment for a wide range of socioeconomic, demographic, weather, behavioral, epidemic stage, and healthcare-related confounders.This study relies entirely on publicly available data and fully reproducible, public code to facilitate continued investigation of these relationships by the broader scientific community as the COVID-19 outbreak evolves and more data become available.A small increase in long-term PM2.5 exposure was associated with a substantial increase in the county’s COVID-19 mortality rate up to April 22, 2020.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharati Kochar ◽  
Yue Jiang ◽  
Wenli Chen ◽  
Yuting Bu ◽  
Edward L Barnes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Home-infusions (HI) for biologic medications are an option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in the United States (US). We aimed to describe the population receiving HI and report patient experience with HI. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Quintiles-IMSLegacy PharMetrics Adjudicated Claims Database from 2010-2016 to describe the population receiving infliximab and vedolizumab HI and determine predictors for an urgent/emergent visit post-HI. We then administered a cross-sectional survey to IBD-Partners Internet-based cohort participants to assess knowledge and experience with infusions. Results We identified claims for 11,892 conventional infliximab patients, 1,573 home infliximab patients, 438 conventional vedolizumab patients and 138 home vedolizumab patients. There were no differences in demographics or median charges with infliximab home and conventional infusions. Home vedolizumab infusions had a greater median charge than conventional vedolizumab infusion. Less than 4% of patients had an urgent/emergent visit post-HI. Charlson comorbidity index &gt;0 (OR:1.95, 95% CI:1.01-3.77) and Medicaid (OR:3.01, 95%CI:1.53-5.94) conferred significantly higher odds of urgent/emergent visit post-HI. In IBD-Partners, 644 IBD patients responded; 56 received HI. The majority chose HI to save time and preferred HI to conventional infusions. Only 2 patients reported an urgent/emergent visit for HI-related problems. Conclusions HI appears to be safe in IBD patients receiving infliximab and vedolizumab. However, patients with fewer resources and more co-morbidities are at increased risk for an urgent/emergent visit post-HI. The overall patient experience with HI is positive. Expansion of HI may result in decreased therapy-related logistic burden for carefully selected patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S132-S133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah H Cross ◽  
Brystana G Kaufman ◽  
Haider Warraich

Abstract While most patients prefer to die at home, trends and factors associated with place of death for patients dying of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain unknown. Using data from the National Center for Health Statistics from 2003-2017, we described trends and conducted multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations between demographic characteristics and place of death among CVD patients in the United States. From 2003-2017, the rate of CVD deaths occurring at home increased from 21.3% to 30.9%, and rate of hospice facility deaths increased from practically none to 6.0%. Over the same period, the rate of hospital deaths decreased from 36.5% to 27.3%, and nursing facility deaths decreased from 25.1% to 20.6%. With the exception of conduction disorders, temporal trends in place of death were consistent across CVD diagnosis subgroups: ischemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, heart failure/cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, aortic stenosis, and all other CVDs. Differences between demographic groups persisted over the study period, with reduced odds of home death among Hispanic versus non-Hispanic (OR=.942; 95% CI .929-.955) decedents, Black versus White (OR=.837; CI .809-.866) decedents and greater odds of home death among decedents with some college education or more (OR=1.08; CI 1.06-1.09) versus decedents with a high-school education or less. In 2014, home surpassed hospital as the most common place of death for CVD patients. CVD patients often have acute and intense needs at the end of life that are challenging to manage in the home and the quality of care these patients receive should be further investigated.


2021 ◽  
pp. oemed-2020-106948
Author(s):  
Tyler D. Quinn ◽  
Patrick L. Yorio ◽  
Peter M. Smith ◽  
Yongsuk Seo ◽  
Geoffrey P. Whitfield ◽  
...  

BackgroundEmerging evidence, predominately from European and Asian countries, describes opposing effects of occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) on cardiovascular health. This analysis examined cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence associated with OPA and LTPA.MethodsThis cross-sectional analysis of 2015 National Health Interview Survey data (n=16 974) employed logistic regression to estimate odds (OR) of self-reported CVD (coronary heart disease, heart attack, stroke or angina) with self-reported total occupational activity (TOA), occupational exertion (OE), occupational standing and walking (OSW) and LTPA. OPA was measured using two questions: ‘How often does your job involve…’ (1) ‘repeated lifting, pushing, pulling or bending?’ (OE) and (2) ‘standing or walking around?’ (OSW) with responses on a 5-item Likert scale (0=never, 4=always). TOA was categorised similarly after summing OE and OSW scores. LTPA was defined as 0, 1–149 or ≥150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous activity. All models adjusted for common socioeconomic variables and additional analyses were stratified by sex, smoking status and LTPA.ResultsOdds for CVD were higher when ‘always’ performing TOA (OR 1.99 95% CI 1.12 to 3.53), OE (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.19) or OSW (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.17) compared with ‘never’. When restricting to never-smokers, odds for CVD were higher when ‘always’ performing TOA (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.38 to 6.51) and OE (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.80 to 5.02) versus ‘never’.ConclusionAssociations of high OPA with CVD were equally apparent across sexes, stronger in lower LTPA levels and stronger in never-smokers. While uncontrolled confounding is still possible, even after extensive adjustment, the seemingly paradoxical adverse associations with OPA and CVD should be investigated further.


SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824402110091
Author(s):  
Sharron Xuanren Wang ◽  
Arthur Sakamoto

Hispanics are the largest minority group in the United States, but quantitative research on the various components of this population has not received extensive investigation. College-educated Hispanics have been particularly neglected due to exaggerated and negative stereotypes. This present study uses data from the 2010 National Survey of College Graduates to investigate wage attainments among college-educated Hispanics. Hispanic Americans are categorized based on their place of birth and age in which they entered the U.S. education system. Results indicate that native-born and foreign-born Hispanic women who have at least a college degree have reached approximate wage parity with comparable native-born non-Hispanic White women. By contrast, native-born Hispanic men face a 10% wage penalty relative to comparable native-born non-Hispanic White men. In addition, foreign-born Hispanic men who immigrated as adults and obtained their college degree outside of the United States face larger wage penalties that are augmented by a lack of citizenship. Theoretical and empirical implications are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document