Ventilator Associated Pneumonia - Improving Quality Of Care In A University Hospital

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad I. Hasan ◽  
Dilip S. Nazareth ◽  
S V. Nagaraja
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Patient Satisfaction and Short-Term Outcome in Elective Cranial Neurosurgery

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 769-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Reponen ◽  
Hanna Tuominen ◽  
Juha Hernesniemi ◽  
Miikka Korja
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Major Morbidity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract BACKGROUND: Patient-reported experience is often used as a measure for quality of care, but no reports on patient satisfaction after cranial neurosurgery exist. OBJECTIVE: To study the association of overall patient satisfaction and surgical outcome and to evaluate the applicability of overall patient satisfaction as a proxy for quality of care in elective cranial neurosurgery. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on the relationship of overall patient satisfaction at 30 postoperative days with surgical and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) in a prospective, consecutive, and unselected cohort of 418 adult elective craniotomy patients enrolled between December 2011 and December 2012 at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. RESULTS: Postoperative overall (subjective and objective) morbidity was present in 194 (46.4%) patients; yet almost 94% of all study patients reported high overall satisfaction. Low overall patient satisfaction at 30 days was not associated with postoperative major morbidity in elective cranial neurosurgery. Dependent functional status (mRS score ≥3) at 30 days, minor infections, poor postoperative subjective overall health status, and patient-reported severe symptoms (double vision, poor balance) may contribute to unsatisfactory patient experience. CONCLUSION: Overall patient satisfaction with elective cranial neurosurgery is high. Even 9 of 10 patients with postoperative major morbidity rated high overall patient satisfaction at 30 days. Overall patient satisfaction may merely reflect patient experience and subjective postoperative health status, and therefore it is a poor proxy for quality of care in elective cranial neurosurgery.

scholarly journals POS1494-HPR THE COLLABORATION OF RHEUMATOLOGY-DERMATOLOGY IN THE EVALUATION OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES PATIENTS: EXPERIENCE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1031.1-1032
Author(s):  
G. Figueroa-Parra ◽  
A. Moreno-Salinas ◽  
C. M. Gamboa-Alonso ◽  
M. A. Villarreal-Alarcón ◽  
D. Á. Galarza-Delgado
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Rheumatology Clinic ◽  
Important Interaction

Background:Dermatological manifestations are not rare in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD). Multidisciplinary management and direct interaction between these disciplines are essential. According to Dermatology-Rheumatology clinics, most diagnoses evaluated are systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with dermatitis being the most common manifestation. It is important to be aware that skin problems in RD patients are not always related to the underlying condition(1). Nowadays, there is significant evidence to support the manifold advantages of the joint dermatology-rheumatology clinics, including improved quality of care for patients and multidisciplinary training for new physicians(2). This ongoing trend is intended to highlight the important interaction between specialties that treat overlapping conditions, and it has been incorporated in academic health centers to give a comprehensive approach to patients.Objectives:Our purpose was to describe the collaboration between the Rheumatology and Dermatology services during the evaluation of RD patients.Methods:An observational, retrospective study was performed in the Rheumatology Service of the University Hospital “Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez” in Monterrey, Mexico, between March 2019 and February 2020. All the patients with a Rheumatology or Dermatology consultation requested were included (hospitalized and outpatients). Demographic (age, gender, baseline diagnosis), the reason for consultation, specialty requested, type of treatment, final diagnoses, and agreement in final diagnosis were registered. Results are shown in descriptive statistics.Results:One hundred and seventy-four patients were included, 142 (81.6%) patients from the outpatient clinic and 32 (18.4%) patients hospitalized. The mean age was 45.1 (SD±15.8) years, 135 (77.6%) were females, 54 (31%) patients were under initial diagnosis evaluation, 30 (17.2%) had RA, 25 (14.4%) patients had SLE, 15 (8.6%) patients had psoriatic arthritis, 12 (6.9%) patients had systemic sclerosis, 6 (3.4%) patients had dermatomyositis. The main reasons for consultation in hospitalized patients were acute lupus (15.6%), subacute lupus (12.5%), purpura (12.5%), cutaneous vasculitis (9.4%), urticarial dermatitis (9.4%), dermatomyositis (6.3%) and others (34.3%). The consultation requested was: 156 (89.7%) to Dermatology and 18 (10.3%) to Rheumatology. The type of treatment prescribed was topic/local in 37 (21.3%) patients, systemic in 25 (14.4%) and both in 92 (52.9%) patients. The final diagnoses were related to the underlying disease in 102 (77%) patients and unrelated in 40 (23%) patients. The agreement between initial clinical suspicion and final diagnoses reached 75.9% between Rheumatology and Dermatology services. Figure 1.Conclusion:The collaboration between Rheumatology and Dermatology services are very important. Most of the patients were under initial evaluation. All the rheumatologists and dermatologists should be aware of the interdependence from both specialties to give the best quality of care to the patients.References:[1]Samycia M, McCourt C, Shojania K, Au S. Experiences From a Combined Dermatology and Rheumatology Clinic: A Retrospective Review. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20(5):486-489. doi:10.1177/1203475416649138.[2]Theodorakopoulou E, Dalamaga M, Katsimbri P, Boumpas DT, Papadavid E. How does the joint dermatology-rheumatology clinic benefit both patients and dermatologists?. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(3):e13283. doi:10.1111/dth.13283Figure 1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Vocational Training and Dental Care in the Unique Health System: Experience Report

2021 ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Family Health ◽  
Experience Report ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
The University

Objective: To report the experience lived during the Integrated Multiprofessional Residency in Family Health at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the University of Pernambuco – FCM/UPE – at the interface with the Residency in Hospital Dentistry with a focus on Oncology at the University of Pernambuco developed at the Oncology Center at the Oswaldo Cruz University Hospital of the University of Pernambuco – CEON/HUOC/UPE. Methods: This is an experience report of dental practice in the context of professional training, in SUS, both in primary, secondary and tertiary care. Results: It is noticeable the need for greater professional qualification of the graduate, their integration in the Services of the institutionalized network and their performance with efficiency in multiprofissional teams, emphasizing the importance of professional training through Residencies, allowing the dental surgeon to improve in the diferente fields of Dentistry activities and, in particular, rescuing the inter-trans-multidisciplinary performance in both primary and hospital care and in the area of oncology. It was noticed that the integrated performance of the dental surgeon in a multidisciplinar team in low and medium complexity with resolvability in oral care is essential for the quality of care in the hospital context. Conclusion: Dental care directly impacts the quality of care and patient’s lives. The training of the dental surgeon throug the Residencies can provide skills and contribute with the other professions to the patient’s quality of life. In addition to its assistance character, the Dentistry Service – CEON/HUOC/UPE assumes an important education function, serving as a teaching research and extension field.

scholarly journals Clinical registry of cardiovascular surgeries in a university hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Roberta Senger ◽  
Michelle Dornelles Santarem ◽  
Sílvia Goldmeier
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Cardiovascular Surgery ◽  
Measured Data ◽  
International Standards ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Clinical Registry ◽  
Health Institutions

SUMMARY OBJECTIVES To create and implement a computerized clinical registry to verify in the short-, medium- and long-term the mortality and the incidence of significant surgical outcomes in adult patients submitted to cardiovascular surgeries. METHODS This is a prospective, observational registry-based study aimed at documenting the characteristics of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. RESULTS Variables were standardized according to international references from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American College of Cardiology (ACC), Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons (MSTCVS) and the Department of Informatics of SUS (DATASUS). The standardization was performed in English with an interface in Portuguese to make the data collection easier in the institution. Quality of care indicators, surgical procedure characteristics, in addition to significant cardiovascular outcomes will be measured. Data were collected during the hospitalization until hospital discharge or at the seventh day, in thirty days, six months, twelve months and annually until completing five years. CONCLUSION The importance of a database maintenance with international standards that can be reproducible was evidenced, allowing the evaluation of techniques and assistance and the integration of data among health institutions.

Evaluation of teamwork in operating rooms in a Tunisian university hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Lamine ◽  
O Ammar ◽  
W Mrabet ◽  
M A Tlili ◽  
W Aouicha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Situation Awareness ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Operating Rooms ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Quality Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The University

Abstract Background Teamwork is fundamental to ensuring the quality of care and patient safety in operating rooms. It has been shown that the occurrence of adverse events is closely linked to a poor quality of teamwork in these settings. Thus, this study aimed to assess teamwork in different operating rooms of the university hospital of Sahloul Sousse (Tunisia). Methods It is a descriptive cross-sectional study with convenience sampling, conducted in operating rooms of the university hospital of Sahloul Sousse (Tunisia) between February and April 2018. The measuring instrument was the validated observation grid 'Communication and Teamwork Skills Assessment Tool (CATS) '. Teamwork is assessed through 4 domains (Situation awareness, Coordination, Communication, Cooperation). Behaviors are marked in rows each time they occur and are rated for quality in columns labeled “Observed and Good,” “Variation in Quality” (meaning incomplete or of variable quality), and “Expected but not Observed.” Results A total of 51 interventions were observed. Good coordination between the team members was noted, as well as good cooperation within the teams. A variation of quality level of communication with the patient was noted in 31.4% of cases, also communication about the context, the situation and recommendation among caregivers is not quite good with a percentage of 39.2%. Moreover, the work environment was rated as good in 84.3% of cases. Conclusions Some failures in teamwork were noted, hence it is important to take corrective measures for better practice and better patient management in such a complex environment, the operating rooms, where there is a strong need for team coordination. Key messages There is a direct relationship between the quality of care and the effectiveness of teamwork. It is necessary to eliminate the barriers to communication, in order to prevent adverse events.

scholarly journals Individual and Organizational Conditions Leading to Quality of Care in Healthcare: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Merits ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Tiago Gonçalves ◽  
Carla Curado
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Ethical Leadership ◽  
Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Individual Level

Quality of care is a complex performance measure of healthcare performance that considers the influence of several contributors. This study enlarges our understanding of how such influences occur. We analyze individual and organizational level characteristics that have a complex relationship with quality of care. We examine specific patterns that lead to both the presence and absence of quality of care using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Our data comes from an online survey of healthcare professionals from a Portuguese university hospital, namely nursing and medical professionals. Our results reveal that combinations of individual-level characteristics, such as the quality of social support among professional peers and the perceived robustness of social networks, contribute to perceptions of quality of care. In addition, the results indicate that combinations of organizational-level characteristics, such as the presence of ethical leadership and the awareness of knowledge management systems, also lead to perceptions of quality of care. The solutions leading to the presence and absence of quality of care are discussed. We conclude that managerial practices in the university hospital should foster informal communication and peer support, given how pervasive their influence is on quality of care, even in circumstances where ethical leadership and awareness of knowledge management systems are absent from the configurations. Additionally, we reveal combinations of both individual-level and organizational-level characteristics that generate the absence of such quality of care, and thus we alert managers for the need to fight such situations.

Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs): Efficiency and/or Quality Producing? — Some Evidence from Surgical Patients

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Barbara L. Wolfe ◽  
Don E. Detmer
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Diagnosis Related Groups ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Medical Care Costs ◽  
Care Costs

Hospital charges and length of stay for inguinal hernia and acute appendicitis patients were examined in a university hospital to determine the degree of variation with DRGs. Evidence presented here suggests that DRGs may lead to a reduction in medical care costs without a reduction in patient outcomes. Mode/year DRGs to take account of source of admission and maintaining outliers payments may be desirable to avoid patient selectivity and incentives for lowering quality of care of the most severely ill patients.

scholarly journals Work at the surgical center: risks of the pathogenic suffering of the nursing team

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosane Lima de Araujo ◽  
Cecília Helena Glanzner
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Professional Experiences ◽  
Nursing Team ◽  
Medium Risk ◽  
South Of Brazil

ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the risks of pathogenic suffering related to the experience of nursing workers in the operating room of a university hospital. Methods: cross-sectional, quantitative study, carried out from 11/2017 to 01/2018 in a university hospital in the South of Brazil. The sample was composed by 159 nursing workers of the units of a surgical center, that answered to the Scale of Evaluation of Pathogenic Suffering at Work. Data was submitted to statistical analysis. Results: the workers present low risk of pathogenic suffering related to the experiences at work, being the results of its factors: Uselessness (1.47±0.761) - low risk; Indignity (2.372±1.035) - medium risk; and Disqualification (1.74±0.903) - low risk. Conclusions: the evaluation of Pathogenic Suffering at Work Scale was positive, predominating low risk for pathogenic suffering of surgical center workers related to professional experiences, because they feel useful, valued and are not indignant about their work, feelings that reflect on the quality of care provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document