scholarly journals Vocational Training and Dental Care in the Unique Health System: Experience Report

Author(s):  

Objective: To report the experience lived during the Integrated Multiprofessional Residency in Family Health at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the University of Pernambuco – FCM/UPE – at the interface with the Residency in Hospital Dentistry with a focus on Oncology at the University of Pernambuco developed at the Oncology Center at the Oswaldo Cruz University Hospital of the University of Pernambuco – CEON/HUOC/UPE. Methods: This is an experience report of dental practice in the context of professional training, in SUS, both in primary, secondary and tertiary care. Results: It is noticeable the need for greater professional qualification of the graduate, their integration in the Services of the institutionalized network and their performance with efficiency in multiprofissional teams, emphasizing the importance of professional training through Residencies, allowing the dental surgeon to improve in the diferente fields of Dentistry activities and, in particular, rescuing the inter-trans-multidisciplinary performance in both primary and hospital care and in the area of oncology. It was noticed that the integrated performance of the dental surgeon in a multidisciplinar team in low and medium complexity with resolvability in oral care is essential for the quality of care in the hospital context. Conclusion: Dental care directly impacts the quality of care and patient’s lives. The training of the dental surgeon throug the Residencies can provide skills and contribute with the other professions to the patient’s quality of life. In addition to its assistance character, the Dentistry Service – CEON/HUOC/UPE assumes an important education function, serving as a teaching research and extension field.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Lamine ◽  
O Ammar ◽  
W Mrabet ◽  
M A Tlili ◽  
W Aouicha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Teamwork is fundamental to ensuring the quality of care and patient safety in operating rooms. It has been shown that the occurrence of adverse events is closely linked to a poor quality of teamwork in these settings. Thus, this study aimed to assess teamwork in different operating rooms of the university hospital of Sahloul Sousse (Tunisia). Methods It is a descriptive cross-sectional study with convenience sampling, conducted in operating rooms of the university hospital of Sahloul Sousse (Tunisia) between February and April 2018. The measuring instrument was the validated observation grid 'Communication and Teamwork Skills Assessment Tool (CATS) '. Teamwork is assessed through 4 domains (Situation awareness, Coordination, Communication, Cooperation). Behaviors are marked in rows each time they occur and are rated for quality in columns labeled “Observed and Good,” “Variation in Quality” (meaning incomplete or of variable quality), and “Expected but not Observed.” Results A total of 51 interventions were observed. Good coordination between the team members was noted, as well as good cooperation within the teams. A variation of quality level of communication with the patient was noted in 31.4% of cases, also communication about the context, the situation and recommendation among caregivers is not quite good with a percentage of 39.2%. Moreover, the work environment was rated as good in 84.3% of cases. Conclusions Some failures in teamwork were noted, hence it is important to take corrective measures for better practice and better patient management in such a complex environment, the operating rooms, where there is a strong need for team coordination. Key messages There is a direct relationship between the quality of care and the effectiveness of teamwork. It is necessary to eliminate the barriers to communication, in order to prevent adverse events.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Giraudeau ◽  
Camille Inquimbert ◽  
Robin Delafoy ◽  
Paul Tramini ◽  
Jean Valcarcel ◽  
...  

Purpose In France, all incarcerated prisoners are required to undergo a dental examination (Ministère de la santé et de la protection sociale, 2004 and Ministère de la justice, 2004). However, only one in two prisoners benefits from this oral health check-up. Oral teleconsultation could improve the quality of oral care in prisons. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The focus of this study was therefore to apply oral teleconsultation as an experiment. Using an oral teleconsultation system, a dentist and a nurse were separately asked to give patients a score, according to how urgently their dental issue needed to be treated. This score will henceforth be referred to as the “dental emergency scores given”. Findings The separate dental emergency scores given by the dentist and the nurse were compared and the results demonstrate the following: – 36.7 per cent (11) of the two scores were equal – 53.3 per cent (16) of the two scores differed by 1 point – 10 per cent (3) of the two scores differed by 2 points. The average score of the nurse was 2.23 and that of the dentist was 2.13. The small disparity should not obscure the fact that 63 per cent of the diagnoses turned out to be incorrect. Practical implications Dental care could easily be improved with oral teleconsultation as a care plan could be developed for each patient. Social implications The condition of one’s dental health is, of course, very important for general health, but it also affects social aspects. Good oral hygiene and health are very important when looking for a job after having been released from prison. Originality/value This is the first study on oral teleconsultation in prisons. Dental care is rarely studied on prisoners. Telemedicine in dentistry is just beginning all over the world. This study is the first step of an extensive project in the University Hospital of Montpellier and the Villeneuve-les-Maguelone prison.


Author(s):  
Shyrley D

En los últimos años, los servicios de salud han enfatizado en la atención holística y humanizada del paciente. Como parte de esos servicios, la atención odontológica no escapa a este modelo, que tiene en cuenta a la familia como entorno influyente en el individuo y a los estilos de vida como factores de riesgos o protectores de la salud; todo ello con el fin de mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas. El objetivo es realizar un resumen de la atención odontológica con enfoque en salud familiar, que se ofrece en la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Cartagena, y precisar la forma como esta puede influir en los cambios de estilos de vida y, más específicamente, en el fomento de la salud física de sus pacientes. Los pacientes que acuden a la consulta odontológica de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Cartagena reciben un tipo de intervención en el que se detectan los factores de riesgos y se trabaja en la modificación de estos, y de manera particular en la disminución de enfermedades cardiovasculares y mentales.ABSTRACTIn recent years we have worked on holistic care and humanized patient health services. Dental care is no exception to this model of care, taking into account the family as an influence on the individual environment and lifestyles as risky or protective of health factors; all this in order to improve the quality of people's lives. The aim is make an overview of dental care with focus on family health is offered in the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Cartagena, and as this can influence changes in lifestyles and more specifically on the promotion of the physical health of their patients. Patients who attend dental consultation of the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Cartagena, receive a consultation where risk factors are detected and where work on the modification of these factors can begin in order to contribute to the decrease of mental and cardiovascular diseases.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1064
Author(s):  
Gitana Scozzari ◽  
Cristina Costa ◽  
Enrica Migliore ◽  
Maurizio Coggiola ◽  
Giovannino Ciccone ◽  
...  

This observational study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence and related clinical, demographic, and occupational factors among workers at the largest tertiary care University-Hospital of Northwestern Italy and the University of Turin after the first pandemic wave of March–April 2020. Overall, about 10,000 individuals were tested; seropositive subjects were retested after 5 months to evaluate antibodies waning. Among 8769 hospital workers, seroprevalence was 7.6%, without significant differences related to job profile; among 1185 University workers, 3.3%. Self-reporting of COVID-19 suspected symptoms was significantly associated with positivity (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.07, 95%CI: 1.76–2.44), although 27% of seropositive subjects reported no previous symptom. At multivariable analysis, contacts at work resulted in an increased risk of 69%, or 24% for working in a COVID ward; contacts in the household evidenced the highest risk, up to more than five-fold (OR 5.31, 95%CI: 4.12–6.85). Compared to never smokers, being active smokers was inversely associated with seroprevalence (OR 0.60, 95%CI: 0.48–0.76). After 5 months, 85% of previously positive subjects still tested positive. The frequency of SARS-COV-2 infection among Health Care Workers was comparable with that observed in surveys performed in Northern Italy and Europe after the first pandemic wave. This study confirms that infection frequently occurred as asymptomatic and underlines the importance of household exposure, seroprevalence (OR 0.60, 95%CI: 0.48–0.76).


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreenivas Koka ◽  
Galya Raz

What does ‘value’ mean? In the context of dental care, it can be defined as the quality of care received by a patient divided by the cost to the patient of receiving that care. In other words: V =Q/C, where Q equals the quality improvement over time, which most patients view in the context of the outcome, the service provided and safety/risk management, and C equals the financial, biological and time cost to the patient. Here, the need for, and implications of, value-based density for clinicians and patients alike are explored.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 769-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Reponen ◽  
Hanna Tuominen ◽  
Juha Hernesniemi ◽  
Miikka Korja

Abstract BACKGROUND: Patient-reported experience is often used as a measure for quality of care, but no reports on patient satisfaction after cranial neurosurgery exist. OBJECTIVE: To study the association of overall patient satisfaction and surgical outcome and to evaluate the applicability of overall patient satisfaction as a proxy for quality of care in elective cranial neurosurgery. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on the relationship of overall patient satisfaction at 30 postoperative days with surgical and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) in a prospective, consecutive, and unselected cohort of 418 adult elective craniotomy patients enrolled between December 2011 and December 2012 at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. RESULTS: Postoperative overall (subjective and objective) morbidity was present in 194 (46.4%) patients; yet almost 94% of all study patients reported high overall satisfaction. Low overall patient satisfaction at 30 days was not associated with postoperative major morbidity in elective cranial neurosurgery. Dependent functional status (mRS score ≥3) at 30 days, minor infections, poor postoperative subjective overall health status, and patient-reported severe symptoms (double vision, poor balance) may contribute to unsatisfactory patient experience. CONCLUSION: Overall patient satisfaction with elective cranial neurosurgery is high. Even 9 of 10 patients with postoperative major morbidity rated high overall patient satisfaction at 30 days. Overall patient satisfaction may merely reflect patient experience and subjective postoperative health status, and therefore it is a poor proxy for quality of care in elective cranial neurosurgery.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1149-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávia Christiane de Azevedo Machado ◽  
Janmille Valdevino Silva ◽  
Maria Ângela Fernandes Ferreira

The Specialized Dental Care Centers (SDCC) have the mission to expand access to public medium complexity dental care and support the primary health care actions at this level of complexity. However, it is necessary to ensure the quality of services and to evaluate such services continuously to identify weaknesses and strengths that support the processes of leadership/management. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of studies on the assessment of oral health in specialized care that may indicate which factors should be investigated. Therefore, this integrated literature review sought to explore the plethora of publications on the evaluation of SDCC in the LILACS and MEDLINE data bases in October 2013 to identify factors possibly related to the performance of such health services. Thus, 13 references were included in this review pointing to forms of organization and management of work processes related to the creation of healthcare networks (operation of regulation centers and setting up of health consortiums). They include the contextual characteristics of the places where SDCCs are located (population size, Family Health Strategy coverage, Municipal Human Development Index, governance, governing capacity) were factors that influenced the SDCCs performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1031.1-1032
Author(s):  
G. Figueroa-Parra ◽  
A. Moreno-Salinas ◽  
C. M. Gamboa-Alonso ◽  
M. A. Villarreal-Alarcón ◽  
D. Á. Galarza-Delgado

Background:Dermatological manifestations are not rare in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD). Multidisciplinary management and direct interaction between these disciplines are essential. According to Dermatology-Rheumatology clinics, most diagnoses evaluated are systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with dermatitis being the most common manifestation. It is important to be aware that skin problems in RD patients are not always related to the underlying condition(1). Nowadays, there is significant evidence to support the manifold advantages of the joint dermatology-rheumatology clinics, including improved quality of care for patients and multidisciplinary training for new physicians(2). This ongoing trend is intended to highlight the important interaction between specialties that treat overlapping conditions, and it has been incorporated in academic health centers to give a comprehensive approach to patients.Objectives:Our purpose was to describe the collaboration between the Rheumatology and Dermatology services during the evaluation of RD patients.Methods:An observational, retrospective study was performed in the Rheumatology Service of the University Hospital “Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez” in Monterrey, Mexico, between March 2019 and February 2020. All the patients with a Rheumatology or Dermatology consultation requested were included (hospitalized and outpatients). Demographic (age, gender, baseline diagnosis), the reason for consultation, specialty requested, type of treatment, final diagnoses, and agreement in final diagnosis were registered. Results are shown in descriptive statistics.Results:One hundred and seventy-four patients were included, 142 (81.6%) patients from the outpatient clinic and 32 (18.4%) patients hospitalized. The mean age was 45.1 (SD±15.8) years, 135 (77.6%) were females, 54 (31%) patients were under initial diagnosis evaluation, 30 (17.2%) had RA, 25 (14.4%) patients had SLE, 15 (8.6%) patients had psoriatic arthritis, 12 (6.9%) patients had systemic sclerosis, 6 (3.4%) patients had dermatomyositis. The main reasons for consultation in hospitalized patients were acute lupus (15.6%), subacute lupus (12.5%), purpura (12.5%), cutaneous vasculitis (9.4%), urticarial dermatitis (9.4%), dermatomyositis (6.3%) and others (34.3%). The consultation requested was: 156 (89.7%) to Dermatology and 18 (10.3%) to Rheumatology. The type of treatment prescribed was topic/local in 37 (21.3%) patients, systemic in 25 (14.4%) and both in 92 (52.9%) patients. The final diagnoses were related to the underlying disease in 102 (77%) patients and unrelated in 40 (23%) patients. The agreement between initial clinical suspicion and final diagnoses reached 75.9% between Rheumatology and Dermatology services. Figure 1.Conclusion:The collaboration between Rheumatology and Dermatology services are very important. Most of the patients were under initial evaluation. All the rheumatologists and dermatologists should be aware of the interdependence from both specialties to give the best quality of care to the patients.References:[1]Samycia M, McCourt C, Shojania K, Au S. Experiences From a Combined Dermatology and Rheumatology Clinic: A Retrospective Review. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20(5):486-489. doi:10.1177/1203475416649138.[2]Theodorakopoulou E, Dalamaga M, Katsimbri P, Boumpas DT, Papadavid E. How does the joint dermatology-rheumatology clinic benefit both patients and dermatologists?. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(3):e13283. doi:10.1111/dth.13283Figure 1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Author(s):  
Nyla Farooq ◽  
Tauyiba Farooq Mir

Background: Cancellation of elective surgical treatments is a quality-of-care issue as well as a huge waste of health-care resources. Patients may experience emotional distress as a result of this, as well as difficulty for their families. Aim: To find the significant reasons of cancellation of scheduled surgical cases. Methods: A total of 300 elective operations in our institution were chosen. The completed surgeries were planned on the scheduled operation day, and the anaesthesiologist noted down a list of cancellations along with their reasons. Results: A total of 300 patients were scheduled for surgery. A total of 60 patients were cancelled, resulting in a 20% cancellation rate. Lack of operational time was the most prevalent reason for cancellation. Conclusion: The majority of the reasons for cancellation should have been avoided with proper list preparation and the surgical team's meticulous planning.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno Mohr ◽  
Mia Kloos ◽  
Christian Schulz ◽  
Michael Pfeifer ◽  
Bernd Salzberger ◽  
...  

Abstract IntroductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the adherence to vaccinations, especially pneumococcal vaccinations, in lung cancer patients.MethodsThe study was performed at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany. All patients with a regular appointment scheduled between December 1, 2020, and April 29, 2021, and who provided informed consent were included. Available medical records, vaccination certificates and a questionnaire were analyzed.Results136 lung cancer patients (NSCLC n = 113, 83.1%, SCLC n = 23, 16.9%) were included. A correct pneumococcal vaccination according to national recommendations was performed in 9.4% (12/127) of patients.A correct vaccination was performed for tetanus in 50.4% (6/131), diphtheria in 34.4% (44/128), poliomyelitis in 25.8% (33/128), tick-borne encephalitis in 40.7% (24/59), hepatitis A in 45.5% (7/11), hepatitis B in 38.5% (5/13), shingles in 3.0% (3/101), measles in 50.0% (3/6), pertussis in 47.7% (62/130), influenza in 54.4% (74/136) and meningococcal meningitis in 0% (0/2).ConclusionAdherence to pneumococcal vaccinations, as well as other vaccinations, is rather low in lung cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document