Effects of Retrospective Gauge-Based Readjustment of Multisensor Precipitation Estimates on Hydrologic Simulations

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Seann Reed ◽  
David Kitzmiller
Keyword(s):  
Time Scale ◽  
Warm Season ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model ◽  
Middle Atlantic ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Daily Scale ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract This paper presents methodologies for mitigating temporally inconsistent biases in National Weather Service (NWS) real-time multisensor quantitative precipitation estimates (MQPEs) through rain gauge–based readjustments, and examines their effects on streamflow simulations. In this study, archived MQPEs over 1997–2006 for the Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center (MARFC) area of responsibility were readjusted at monthly and daily scales using two gridded gauge products. The original and readjusted MQPEs were applied as forcing to the NWS Distributed Hydrologic Model for 12 catchments in the domain of MARFC. The resultant hourly streamflow simulations were compared for two subperiods divided along November 2003, when a software error that gave rise to a low bias in MQPEs was fixed. It was found that readjustment at either time scale improved the consistency in the bias in streamflow simulations. For the earlier period, independent monthly and daily readjustments considerably improved the streamflow simulations for most basins as judged by bias and correlation. By contrast, for the later period the effects were mixed across basins. It was also found that 1) readjustments tended to be more effective in the cool rather than warm season, 2) refining the readjustment resolution to daily had mixed effects on streamflow simulations, and 3) at the daily scale, redistributing gauge rainfall is beneficial for periods with substantial missing MQPEs.

Evolving Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Methods: Their Impacts on Flow Prediction Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1414-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kitzmiller ◽  
Suzanne Van Cooten ◽  
Feng Ding ◽  
Kenneth Howard ◽  
Carrie Langston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Freezing Level ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates

Abstract This study investigates evolving methodologies for radar and merged gauge–radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) to determine their influence on the flow predictions of a distributed hydrologic model. These methods include the National Mosaic and QPE algorithm package (NMQ), under development at the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL), and the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) and High-Resolution Precipitation Estimator (HPE) suites currently operational at National Weather Service (NWS) field offices. The goal of the study is to determine which combination of algorithm features offers the greatest benefit toward operational hydrologic forecasting. These features include automated radar quality control, automated Z–R selection, brightband identification, bias correction, multiple radar data compositing, and gauge–radar merging, which all differ between NMQ and MPE–HPE. To examine the spatial and temporal characteristics of the precipitation fields produced by each of the QPE methodologies, high-resolution (4 km and hourly) gridded precipitation estimates were derived by each algorithm suite for three major precipitation events between 2003 and 2006 over subcatchments within the Tar–Pamlico River basin of North Carolina. The results indicate that the NMQ radar-only algorithm suite consistently yielded closer agreement with reference rain gauge reports than the corresponding HPE radar-only estimates did. Similarly, the NMQ radar-only QPE input generally yielded hydrologic simulations that were closer to observations at multiple stream gauging points. These findings indicate that the combination of Z–R selection and freezing-level identification algorithms within NMQ, but not incorporated within MPE and HPE, would have an appreciable positive impact on hydrologic simulations. There were relatively small differences between NMQ and HPE gauge–radar estimates in terms of accuracy and impacts on hydrologic simulations, most likely due to the large influence of the input rain gauge information.

scholarly journals Improving Multisensor Precipitation Estimation via Adaptive Conditional Bias–Penalized Merging of Rain Gauge Data and Remotely Sensed Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2347-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Jozaghi ◽  
Mohammad Nabatian ◽  
Seongjin Noh ◽  
Dong-Jun Seo ◽  
Lin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computational Cost ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Radar Satellite ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract We describe and evaluate adaptive conditional bias–penalized cokriging (CBPCK) for improved multisensor precipitation estimation using rain gauge data and remotely sensed quantitative precipitation estimates (QPE). The remotely sensed QPEs used are radar-only and radar–satellite-fused estimates. For comparative evaluation, true validation is carried out over the continental United States (CONUS) for 13–30 September 2015 and 7–9 October 2016. The hourly gauge data, radar-only QPE, and satellite QPE used are from the Hydrometeorological Automated Data System, Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor System, and Self-Calibrating Multivariate Precipitation Retrieval (SCaMPR), respectively. For radar–satellite fusion, conditional bias–penalized Fisher estimation is used. The reference merging technique compared is ordinary cokriging (OCK) used in the National Weather Service Multisensor Precipitation Estimator. It is shown that, beyond the reduction due to mean field bias (MFB) correction, both OCK and adaptive CBPCK additionally reduce the unconditional root-mean-square error (RMSE) of radar-only QPE by 9%–16% over the CONUS for the two periods, and that adaptive CBPCK is superior to OCK for estimation of hourly amounts exceeding 1 mm. When fused with the MFB-corrected radar QPE, the MFB-corrected SCaMPR QPE for September 2015 reduces the unconditional RMSE of the MFB-corrected radar by 4% and 6% over the entire and western half of the CONUS, respectively, but is inferior to the MFB-corrected radar for estimation of hourly amounts exceeding 7 mm. Adaptive CBPCK should hence be favored over OCK for estimation of significant amounts of precipitation despite larger computational cost, and the SCaMPR QPE should be used selectively in multisensor QPE.

scholarly journals Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 2975-3003 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Goudenhoofdt ◽  
L. Delobbe
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
Geostatistical Methods ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Field Bias ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract. Accurate quantitative precipitation estimates are of crucial importance for hydrological studies and applications. When spatial precipitation fields are required, rain gauge measurements are often combined with weather radar observations. In this paper, we evaluate several radar-gauge merging methods with various degrees of complexity: from mean field bias correction to geostatical merging techniques. The study area is the Walloon region of Belgium, which is mostly located in the Meuse catchment. Observations from a C-band Doppler radar and a dense rain gauge network are used to retrieve daily rainfall accumulations over this area. The relative performance of the different merging methods are assessed through a comparison against daily measurements from an independent gauge network. A 3-year verification is performed using several statistical quality parameters. It appears that the geostatistical merging methods perform best with the mean absolute error decreasing by 40% with respect to the original data. A mean field bias correction still achieves a reduction of 25%. A seasonal analysis shows that the benefit of using radar observations is particularly significant during summer. The effect of the network density on the performance of the methods is also investigated. For this purpose, a simple approach to remove gauges from a network is proposed. The analysis reveals that the sensitivity is relatively high for the geostatistical methods but rather small for the simple methods. The geostatistical methods give the best results for all network densities except for a very low density of 1 gauge per 500 km2 where a range-dependent adjustment complemented with a static local bias correction performs best.

scholarly journals Precipitation Estimates from Commercial Microwave Links: Practical Approaches to Wet-antenna Correction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Pastorek ◽  
Martin Fencl ◽  
Jörg Rieckermann ◽  
Vojtěch Bareš
Keyword(s):  
Rainfall Intensity ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Attenuation Models ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Rain Gauge Network ◽  
Commercial Microwave Links

An inadequate correction for wet antenna attenuation (WAA) often causes a notable bias in quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) from commercial microwave links (CMLs) limiting the usability of these rainfall data in hydrological applications. This paper analyzes how WAA can be corrected without dedicated rainfall monitoring for a set of 16 CMLs. Using data collected over 53 rainfall events, the performance of six empirical WAA models was studied, both when calibrated to rainfall observations from a permanent municipal rain gauge network and when using model parameters from the literature. The transferability of WAA model parameters among CMLs of various characteristics has also been addressed. The results show that high-quality QPEs with a bias below 5% and RMSE of 1 mm/h in the median could be retrieved, even from sub-kilometer CMLs where WAA is relatively large compared to raindrop attenuation. Models in which WAA is proportional to rainfall intensity provide better WAA estimates than constant and time-dependent models. It is also shown that the parameters of models deriving WAA explicitly from rainfall intensity are independent of CML frequency and path length and, thus, transferable to other locations with CMLs of similar antenna properties.

scholarly journals Automatic quality control of telemetric rain gauge data for operational applications at IMGW-PIB

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 00028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Otop ◽  
Jan Szturc ◽  
Katarzyna Ośródka ◽  
Piotr Djaków
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Error Detection ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Temporal Consistency ◽  
Consistency Check ◽  
Gross Error Detection ◽  
Individual Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

The automatic procedure of real-time quality control (QC) of telemetric rain gauge measurements (G) has been developed to produce quantitative precipitation estimates mainly for the needs of operational hydrology. The developed QC procedure consists of several tests: gross error detection, a range check, a spatial consistency check, a temporal consistency check, and a radar and satellite conformity check. The output of the procedure applied in real-time is quality index QI(G) that quantitatively characterised quality of each individual measurement. The QC procedure has been implemented into operational work at the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management since 2016. However, some elements of the procedure are still under development and can be improved based on the results and experience collected after about two years of real-time work on network of telemetric rain gauges

scholarly journals Radar-Based Precipitation Climatology in Germany—Developments, Uncertainties and Potentials

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kreklow ◽  
Björn Tetzlaff ◽  
Benjamin Burkhard ◽  
Gerald Kuhnt
Keyword(s):  
Ground Truth ◽  
Winter Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
Hourly Rainfall ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Precipitation is a crucial driver for many environmental processes and weather radars are capable of providing precipitation information with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, radar-based quantitative precipitation estimates (QPE) are also subject to various potential uncertainties. This study explored the development, uncertainties and potentials of the hourly operational German radar-based and gauge-adjusted QPE called RADOLAN and its reanalyzed radar climatology dataset named RADKLIM in comparison to ground-truth rain gauge data. The precipitation datasets were statistically analyzed across various time scales ranging from annual and seasonal aggregations to hourly rainfall intensities in regard to their capability to map long-term precipitation distribution, to detect low intensity rainfall and to capture heavy rainfall. Moreover, the impacts of season, orography and distance from the radar on long-term precipitation sums were examined in order to evaluate dataset performance and to describe inherent biases. Results revealed that both radar products tend to underestimate total precipitation sums and particularly high intensity rainfall. However, our analyses also showed significant improvements throughout the RADOLAN time series as well as major advances through the climatologic reanalysis regarding the correction of typical radar artefacts, orographic and winter precipitation as well as range-dependent attenuation.

scholarly journals A Method for Evaluating the Accuracy of Quantitative Precipitation Estimates from a Hydrologic Modeling Perspective

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Gourley ◽  
Baxter E. Vieux
Keyword(s):  
Hydrologic Modeling ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Hydrologic Models ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Primary Focus ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract A major goal in quantitative precipitation estimation and forecasting is the ability to provide accurate initial conditions for the purposes of hydrologic modeling. The accuracy of a streamflow prediction system is dependent upon how well the initial hydrometeorological states are characterized. A methodology is developed to objectively and quantitatively evaluate the skill of several different precipitation algorithms at the scale of application—a watershed. Thousands of hydrologic simulations are performed in an ensemble fashion, enabling an exploration of the model parameter space. Probabilistic statistics are then utilized to compare the relative skill of hydrologic simulations produced from the different precipitation inputs to the observed streamflow. The primary focus of this study is to demonstrate a methodology to evaluate precipitation algorithms that can be used to supplement traditional radar–rain gauge analyses. This approach is appropriate for the evaluation of precipitation estimates or forecasts that are intended to serve as inputs to hydrologic models.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Rain Gauge, Radar, and Satellite-Based Precipitation Estimates with Emphasis on Hydrologic Forecasting

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koray K. Yilmaz ◽  
Terri S. Hogue ◽  
Kuo-lin Hsu ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian ◽  
Hoshin V. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Performance ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Soil Moisture Accounting ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
System Maps ◽  
Accounting Model ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Abstract This study compares mean areal precipitation (MAP) estimates derived from three sources: an operational rain gauge network (MAPG), a radar/gauge multisensor product (MAPX), and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) satellite-based system (MAPS) for the time period from March 2000 to November 2003. The study area includes seven operational basins of varying size and location in the southeastern United States. The analysis indicates that agreements between the datasets vary considerably from basin to basin and also temporally within the basins. The analysis also includes evaluation of MAPS in comparison with MAPG for use in flow forecasting with a lumped hydrologic model [Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)]. The latter evaluation investigates two different parameter sets, the first obtained using manual calibration on historical MAPG, and the second obtained using automatic calibration on both MAPS and MAPG, but over a shorter time period (23 months). Results indicate that the overall performance of the model simulations using MAPS depends on both the bias in the precipitation estimates and the size of the basins, with poorer performance in basins of smaller size (large bias between MAPG and MAPS) and better performance in larger basins (less bias between MAPG and MAPS). When using MAPS, calibration of the parameters significantly improved the model performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document