Emergent Constraints on CMIP6 Climate Warming Projections: Contrasting Cloud- and Surface Temperature-Based Constraints

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-61

Abstract The latest Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) multi-model ensemble shows a broader range of projected warming than the previous-generation CMIP5 ensemble. We show that the projected warming is well-correlated with tropical and subtropical low-level cloud properties. These physically-meaningful relations enable us to use observed cloud properties to constrain future climate warming. We develop multivariate-linear-regression models with metrics selected from a set of potential constraints based on a step-wise selection approach. The resulting linear regression model using two low-cloud metrics shows better cross-validated results than regression models which use single metrics as constraints. Application of a regression model using the low-cloud metrics to climate projections results in similar estimates of the mean, but substantially-narrower ranges, of projected 21st century warming when compared with unconstrained simulations. The resulting projected global-mean warming in 2081-2100 relative to 1995-2014 is 2.84-5.12 K (5-95% range) for Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 5-8.5, compared with a range of 2.34-5.81 K for unconstrained projections, and 0.60-1.70 K for SSP1-2.6, compared to an unconstrained range of 0.38-2.04 K. We provide evidence for a higher lower-bound of the projected warming range than that obtained from constrained projections based on the past global-mean temperature trend. Consideration of the impact of the sea surface temperature pattern effect on the recent observed warming trend, which is not well-captured in the CMIP6 ensemble, indicates that the relatively-low projected warming resulting from the global-mean temperature trend constraint may not be reliable and provides further justification for the use of climatologically-based cloud metrics to constrain projections.

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1037-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Carlson ◽  
Rodrigo Caballero

Abstract. Recent work in modelling the warm climates of the early Eocene shows that it is possible to obtain a reasonable global match between model surface temperature and proxy reconstructions, but only by using extremely high atmospheric CO2 concentrations or more modest CO2 levels complemented by a reduction in global cloud albedo. Understanding the mix of radiative forcing that gave rise to Eocene warmth has important implications for constraining Earth's climate sensitivity, but progress in this direction is hampered by the lack of direct proxy constraints on cloud properties. Here, we explore the potential for distinguishing among different radiative forcing scenarios via their impact on regional climate changes. We do this by comparing climate model simulations of two end-member scenarios: one in which the climate is warmed entirely by CO2 (which we refer to as the greenhouse gas (GHG) scenario) and another in which it is warmed entirely by reduced cloud albedo (which we refer to as the low CO2–thin clouds or LCTC scenario) . The two simulations have an almost identical global-mean surface temperature and equator-to-pole temperature difference, but the LCTC scenario has  ∼  11 % greater global-mean precipitation than the GHG scenario. The LCTC scenario also has cooler midlatitude continents and warmer oceans than the GHG scenario and a tropical climate which is significantly more El Niño-like. Extremely high warm-season temperatures in the subtropics are mitigated in the LCTC scenario, while cool-season temperatures are lower at all latitudes. These changes appear large enough to motivate further, more detailed study using other climate models and a more realistic set of modelling assumptions.


1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Knight

This paper considers the asymptotic behavior of M-estimates in a dynamic linear regression model where the errors have infinite second moments but the exogenous regressors satisfy the standard assumptions. It is shown that under certain conditions, the estimates of the parameters corresponding to the exogenous regressors are asymptotically normal and converge to the true values at the standard n−½ rate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula R Gonçalves ◽  
Bruna L Porto ◽  
Bruna Rodolfo ◽  
Clovis M Faggion Jr ◽  
Bernardo A. Agostini ◽  
...  

Abstract This study investigated the presence of co-authorship from Brazil in articles published in top-tier dental journals and analyzed the influence of international collaboration, article type (original research or review), and funding on citation rates. Articles published between 2015 and 2017 in 38 selected journals from 14 dental subareas were screened in Scopus. Bibliographic information, citation counts, and funding details were recorded for all articles (N=15619). Collaboration with other top-10 publishing countries in dentistry was registered. Annual citations averages (ACA) were calculated. A linear regression model assessed differences in ACA between subareas. Multilevel linear regression models evaluated the influence of article type, funding, and presence of international collaboration in ACA. Brazil was a frequent co-author of articles published in the period (top 3: USA=25.5%; Brazil=13.8%; Germany=9.2%) and the country with most publications in two subareas. The subjects with the biggest share of Brazil are Operative Dentistry/Cariology, Dental Materials, and Endodontics. Brazil was second in total citations, but fifth in citation averages per article. From the total of 2155 articles co-authored by Brazil, 74.8% had no co-authorship from other top-10 publishing countries. USA (17.8%), Italy (4.2%), and UK (3.2%) were the main co-author countries, but the main collaboration country varied between subjects. Implantology and Dental Materials were the subjects with most international co-authorship. Review articles and articles with international collaboration were associated with increased citation rates, whereas the presence of study funding did not influence the citations.


Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 525
Author(s):  
Samer A Kharroubi

Background: Typically, modeling of health-related quality of life data is often troublesome since its distribution is positively or negatively skewed, spikes at zero or one, bounded and heteroscedasticity. Objectives: In the present paper, we aim to investigate whether Bayesian beta regression is appropriate for analyzing the SF-6D health state utility scores and respondent characteristics. Methods: A sample of 126 Lebanese members from the American University of Beirut valued 49 health states defined by the SF-6D using the standard gamble technique. Three different models were fitted for SF-6D via Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation methods. These comprised a beta regression, random effects and random effects with covariates. Results from applying the three Bayesian beta regression models were reported and compared based on their predictive ability to previously used linear regression models, using mean prediction error (MPE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and deviance information criterion (DIC). Results: For the three different approaches, the beta regression model was found to perform better than the normal regression model under all criteria used. The beta regression with random effects model performs best, with MPE (0.084), RMSE (0.058) and DIC (−1621). Compared to the traditionally linear regression model, the beta regression provided better predictions of observed values in the entire learning sample and in an out-of-sample validation. Conclusions: Beta regression provides a flexible approach to modeling health state values. It also accounted for the boundedness and heteroscedasticity of the SF-6D index scores. Further research is encouraged.


2012 ◽  
Vol 512-515 ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Daut ◽  
Mohd Irwan Yusoff ◽  
Safwati Ibrahim ◽  
Muhamad Irwanto ◽  
Gomesh Nsurface

Statistical models for predicting the solar radiation have been developed. In any prediction of the solar radiation, an understanding of its characteristics is of fundamental importance. This study presents an investigation of a relationship between solar radiation and surface temperature in Perlis, Northern Malaysia for the year of 2006. To achieve this, the data are presented in daily averaged maximum and minimum surface temperature, and daily averaged solar radiation. Since the scatter plots represent the straight line, the linear regression model was selected to estimate the solar radiation. It was found that the linear correlation coefficient value is 0.7473 shows that a strong linear relationship between solar radiation and surface temperature. The analysis of variance R2 is 0.5585 that is; about 56 percent of the variability in temperature is accounted for by the straight-line fit to solar radiation. Based on the results, the fitted model is adequate to represent the estimation of solar radiation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 448-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Norris ◽  
William A. Ghali ◽  
L. Duncan Saunders ◽  
Rollin Brant ◽  
Diane Galbraith ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuang Zhou ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Yongqiang Zhang

As cloud data center consumes more and more energy, both researchers and engineers aim to minimize energy consumption while keeping its services available. A good energy model can reflect the relationships between running tasks and the energy consumed by hardware and can be further used to schedule tasks for saving energy. In this paper, we analyzed linear and nonlinear regression energy model based on performance counters and system utilization and proposed a support vector regression energy model. For performance counters, we gave a general linear regression framework and compared three linear regression models. For system utilization, we compared our support vector regression model with linear regression and three nonlinear regression models. The experiments show that linear regression model is good enough to model performance counters, nonlinear regression is better than linear regression model for modeling system utilization, and support vector regression model is better than polynomial and exponential regression models.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shibajyoti Banerjee

Observing decline in machine performance using a Linear Regression model<br>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peijia Liu ◽  
Dong Yang ◽  
Shaomin Li ◽  
Yutian Chong ◽  
Wentao Hu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The utilization of estimating-GFR equations is critical for kidney disease in the clinic. However, the performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation has not improved substantially in the past eight years. Here we hypothesized that random forest regression(RF) method could go beyond revised linear regression, which is used to build the CKD-EPI equationMethods 1732 participants were enrolled in this study totally (1333 in development data set from Tianhe District and 399 in external data set Luogang District). Recursive feature elimination (RFE) is applied to the development data to select important variables and build random forest models. Then same variables were used to develop the estimated GFR equation with linear regression as a comparison. The performances of these equations are measured by bias, 30% accuracy , precision and root mean square error(RMSE).Results Of all the variables, creatinine, cystatin C, weight, body mass index (BMI), age, uric acid(UA), blood urea nitrogen(BUN), hematocrit(HCT) and apolipoprotein B(APOB) were selected by RFE method. The results revealed that the overall performance of random forest regression models ascended the revised regression models based on the same variables. In the 9-variable model, RF model was better than revised linear regression in term of bias, precision ,30%accuracy and RMSE(0.78 vs 2.98, 16.90 vs 23.62, 0.84 vs 0.80, 16.88 vs 18.70, all P<0.01 ). In the 4-variable model, random forest regression model showed an improvement in precision and RMSE compared with revised regression model. (20.82 vs 25.25, P<0.01, 19.08 vs 20.60, P<0.001). Bias and 30%accurancy were preferable, but the results were not statistically significant (0.34 vs 2.07, P=0.10, 0.8 vs 0.78, P=0.19, respectively).Conclusions The performances of random forest regression models are better than revised linear regression models when it comes to GFR estimation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shokrya Saleh Alshqaq ◽  

The least trimmed squares (LTS) estimation has been successfully used in the robust linear regression models. This article extends the LTS estimation to the Jammalamadaka and Sarma (JS) circular regression model. The robustness of the proposed estimator is studied and the used algorithm for computation is discussed. Simulation studied, and real data show that the proposed robust circular estimator effectively fits JS circular models in the presence of vertical outliers and leverage points.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document