scholarly journals Editors’ welcome to Implementation Research and Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 002076402092492
Author(s):  
Cara C Lewis ◽  
Sonja K Schoenwald

This editorial introduces the new, online-only, open-access, international journal, Implementation Research and Practice (IRP), jointly published by SAGE and the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC). IRP provides rapid publication of interdisciplinary research that advances the implementation in diverse contexts of effective approaches to assess, prevent, and treat mental health, substance use, or other addictive behaviors, in the general population or among those at risk or suffering from these disorders. IRP welcomes a variety of paper types designed to publish empirical, methodological, conceptual, and practical advances, as well as syntheses and perspectives intended to inspire new directions for future research. Consistent with the title of the journal, IRP welcomes manuscripts that stimulate, curate, and align research, policy, and practice.

Author(s):  
Lauri Goldkind ◽  
Lea Wolf

Tele-mental health, or the provision of remote counseling services, has been available for decades. This qualitative study uses the framework of affordances, derived from Gibson, to examine what social work practitioners working on direct to consumer tele-mental health (DTCTMH) platforms are discovering about the features, benefits, and constraints of virtual therapy. An interpretive phenomenological approach was employed to document the lived experiences of social workers who practice in this manner. According to the practitioners interviewed, for a subset of individuals seeking treatment, DTCTMH can offer meaningful interpersonal interaction that confers benefit. Key affordances include accessibility, anonymity, meaningful work, autonomy, lifelong learning, and access by new populations. Practitioners simultaneously acknowledge the ethical complexities and structural challenges of DTCTMH practice. The article concludes with suggestions for future research, policy, and practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the biggest contemporary threats to global health, food security and development. AMR is associated with longer illness, higher mortality and higher health care costs, and threatens the success of many disease interventions including surgery, chemotherapy and the fight against HIV, TB and Malaria. The risks and impacts of AMR are truly universal and global, putting everyone at risk across demographic, socioeconomic and geographic boundaries. AMR is a “wicked” problem driven by a range of complex, structural and interconnected factors, including in sectors related to human health, animal health, agriculture and the environment. Research on AMR is therefore needed not only from, but which bridges across, diverse disciplines including biomedicine, public health and the environmental, animal, social and political sciences. Despite calls for coordinated action on AMR, traditional siloes between sectors and disciplines, and from research to practice, remain difficult to bridge. Many efforts have strengthened communication and coordination but remain essentially focused on “drugs and bugs”, stopping short of achieving the type of radical, integrative and trans-border (disciplinary, sectoral, national, etc) collaboration needed to explore and effectively tackle this complex challenge. The goal of this workshop is to create a space for dedicated discussion between professionals from diverse disciplines, sectors and settings to explore the following questions: What key questions or challenges for understanding and tackling AMR (from a research, policy or practice perspective) need to be explored using an interdisciplinary research approach?What thematic intersections, tensions and synergies exist between different disciplines conducting research on or relevant to AMR? What different theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches can be brought together to answer such questions?How can we create bridges and strengthen solidarity between professionals in different disciplines, sectors and stakeholder groups to foster the type of systematic, inter-/trans-disciplinary research needed? How can we ensure the knowledge generated informs evidence-based policy and practice to effectively and equitably tackle AMR?What initiatives for inter-/trans-disciplinary research on AMR have been effective and what can be learned to inform future research? Following a brief introduction of key concepts and objectives, two presentations will provide input from research on the macro-structural drivers of AMR, which demonstrate the importance and value of different disciplinary research on this topic. A third presentation will explore equity and gender considerations in tackling AMR. The subsequent discussion will examine the above questions by tapping into the expertise, experience and perspectives of the presenters and participants. The workshop will close with a summary of lessons learnt and directions for future research. Key messages New forms of inter- and trans-disciplinary, translational research are needed to understand the complex drivers and dynamics of antimicrobial resistance and how to address this major global threat. Meaningful exchange is needed to identify concrete ways to overcome the methodological, practical and other challenges to conducting systematic, inter-/trans-disciplinary research on AMR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-61
Author(s):  
Francesc Fusté-Forné ◽  
Tazim Jamal

Research on the relationship between automation services and tourism has been rapidly growing in recent years and has led to a new service landscape where the role of robots is gaining both practical and research attention. This paper builds on previous reviews and undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the research literature to discuss opportunities and challenges presented by the use of service robots in hospitality and tourism. Management and ethical issues are identified and it is noted that practical and ethical issues (roboethics) continue to lack attention. Going forward, new directions are urgently needed to inform future research and practice. Legal and ethical issues must be proactively addressed, and new research paradigms developed to explore the posthumanist and transhumanist transitions that await. In addition, closer attention to the potential of “co-creation” for addressing innovations in enhanced service experiences in hospitality and tourism is merited. Among others, responsibility, inclusiveness and collaborative human-robot design and implementation emerge as important principles to guide future research and practice in this area.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 4400
Author(s):  
Zhao Zhai ◽  
Ming Shan ◽  
Amos Darko ◽  
Albert P. C. Chan

Corruption has been identified as a major problem in construction projects. It can jeopardize the success of these projects. Consequently, corruption has garnered significant attention in the construction industry over the past two decades, and several studies on corruption in construction projects (CICP) have been conducted. Previous efforts to analyze and review this body of knowledge have been manual, qualitative and subjective, thus prone to bias and limited in the number of reviewed studies. There remains a lack of inclusive, quantitative, objective and computational analysis of global CICP research to inform future research, policy and practice. This study aims to address this lack by providing the first inclusive bibliometric study exploring the state-of-the-art of global CICP research. To this end, a quantitative and objective technique aided by CiteSpace was used to systematically and computationally analyze a large corpus of 542 studies retrieved from the Web of Science and published from 2000 to 2020. The findings revealed major and influential CICP research journals, persons, institutions, countries, references and areas of focus, as well as revealing how these interact with each other in research networks. This study contributes to the in-depth understanding of global research on CICP. By highlighting the principal research areas, gaps, emerging trends and directions, as well as patterns in CICP research, the findings could help researchers, practitioners and policy makers position their future CICP research and/or mitigation strategies.


Author(s):  
Joshua P. Taylor ◽  
Holly N. Whittenburg ◽  
Magen Rooney-Kron ◽  
Tonya Gokita ◽  
Stephanie J. Lau ◽  
...  

Many youth with disabilities experience persistently low rates of competitive integrated employment (CIE) and participation in higher education. In 2014, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) established a policy focus on CIE as the goal of vocational services for youth and individuals with disabilities. In addition, WIOA created provision for Pre–Employment Transition Services (Pre-ETS) to ensure that state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies focused sufficient resources toward transition-age youth. This study examined a sample of WIOA State Implementation Plans in depth using content analysis to identify how state VR agencies prioritized the provision of Pre-ETS services to youth with disabilities. Analysis of state plans resulted in three emergent themes: (a) instructional priorities, (b) instructional contexts, and (c) networks of stakeholders. We discuss the implications of these themes for future research, policy, and practice related to the employment of individuals with disabilities.


Inclusion ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karrie A. Shogren ◽  
Michael L. Wehmeyer

Abstract This article analyzes the relationship between the core concepts of disability policy and the three generations of inclusive practices. Specifically, we review the three generations of inclusive practice, highlighting the core concepts that have been most strongly emphasized during each generation of inclusive practices. Because we are early in the third generation of inclusive practices, we conclude by examining how the core concepts can guide and direct third generation inclusive practices and how future research, policy, and practice can actualize the aspirational values of all of the core concepts to enable desired outcomes.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e1001434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Y. Collins ◽  
Thomas R. Insel ◽  
Arun Chockalingam ◽  
Abdallah Daar ◽  
Yvonne T. Maddox

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-201
Author(s):  
Emily Carlson ◽  
Ian Cross

Although the fields of music psychology and music therapy share many common interests, research collaboration between the two fields is still somewhat rare. Previous work has identified that disciplinary identities and attitudes towards those in other disciplines are challenges to effective interdisciplinary research. The current study explores such attitudes in music therapy and music psychology. A sample of 123 music therapists and music psychologists answered an online survey regarding their attitudes towards potential interdisciplinary work between the two fields. Analysis of results suggested that participants’ judgements of the attitudes of members of the other discipline were not always accurate. Music therapists indicated a high degree of interest in interdisciplinary research, although in free text answers, both music psychologists and music therapists frequently characterized music therapists as disinterested in science. Music therapists reported seeing significantly greater relevance of music psychology to their own work than did music psychologists of music therapists. Participants’ attitudes were modestly related to their reported personality traits and held values. Results overall indicated interest in, and positive expectations of, interdisciplinary attitudes in both groups, and should be explored in future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document