Racial Disparities in Adult Cochlear Implantation

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110273
Author(s):  
Geethanjeli N. Mahendran ◽  
Tyler Rosenbluth ◽  
Miriam Featherstone ◽  
Esther X. Vivas ◽  
Douglas E. Mattox ◽  
...  

Objective To compare rates of cochlear implant referral and cochlear implantation across different races and to compare audiometric profiles of these patients. Study Design Retrospective study. Setting Academic tertiary care institution. Methods Demographic and audiometric data were collected for patients who underwent cochlear implant evaluation or cochlear implantation from 2010 to 2020. Results A total of 504 patients underwent cochlear implant evaluation; 388 met cochlear implant candidacy criteria, and 258 underwent implantation. Of the patients referred for cochlear implant evaluation, 68.5% were White, 18.5% were Black, and 12.3% were Asian, while the institution’s primary service area is 46.9% White, 42.3% Black, and 7.7% Asian (P < .001). Black patients referred for cochlear implant evaluation had significantly worse hearing (mean pure-tone average [PTA] 84.5 dB, 26.1% word recognition) than White patients (mean PTA 78.2 dB, P = .005; 35.7% word recognition, P = .015) and Asians patients (mean PTA 77.9 dB, P = .04; 36.5% word recognition, P = .04). Black patients who underwent cochlear implant evaluation also had significantly worse AzBio scores than White patients: 24.5% versus 36.7% (P = .003). There was no significant difference in cochlear implantation rates between Black and White candidates (P = .06). Conclusion Black patients undergo cochlear implant evaluation and cochlear implantation at rates disproportionately lower than expected based on local demographics. In addition, Black patients have significantly worse hearing at the time of cochlear implant referral than White and Asian patients. Identifying and increasing awareness of these disparities are essential steps to improving cochlear implant access for potentially disadvantaged populations.

Author(s):  
Edward L Barnes ◽  
Christina M Bauer ◽  
Robert S Sandler ◽  
Michael D Kappelman ◽  
Millie D Long

Abstract Background Prior studies have identified racial disparities in the treatment and outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These disparities could be secondary to differences in biology, care delivery, or access to appropriate therapy. The primary aim of this study was to compare medication use among Medicaid-insured black and white patients with IBD, given uniform access to gastroenterologists and therapies. Methods We analyzed Medicaid Analytic eXtract data from 4 states (California, Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas) between 2006 and 2011. We compared the use of IBD-specific therapies, including analyses of postoperative therapy among patients with Crohn disease (CD). We performed bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Results We identified 14,735 patients with IBD (4672 black [32%], 8277 with CD [58%]). In multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in the odds of anti-tumor necrosis factor use by race for CD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.28] or ulcerative colitis (aOR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.96-1.32). Black patients with CD were more likely than white patients to receive combination therapy (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15-1.96), and black patients were more likely than white patients to receive immunomodulator monotherapy after surgery for CD (31% vs 18%; P = 0.004). Conclusions In patients with Medicaid insurance, where access to IBD-specific therapy should be similar for all individuals, there was no significant disparity by race in the utilization of IBD-specific therapies. Disparities in IBD treatment discussed in prior literature seem to be driven by socioeconomic or other issues affecting access to care.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Christiane Völter ◽  
Lisa Götze ◽  
Imme Haubitz ◽  
Janine Müther ◽  
Stefan Dazert ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Age-related hearing loss affects about one-third of the population worldwide. Studies suggest that hearing loss may be linked to cognitive decline and auditory rehabilitation may improve cognitive functions. So far, the data are limited, and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. The study aimed to analyze the impact of cochlear implantation on cognition in a large homogeneous population of hearing-impaired adults using a comprehensive non-auditory cognitive assessment with regard to normal-hearing (NH) subjects. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> Seventy-one cochlear implant (CI) candidates with a postlingual, bilateral severe or profound hearing loss aged 66.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.2) and 105 NH subjects aged 65.96 years (SD 9.4) were enrolled. The computer-based neurocognitive tool applied included 11 subtests covering attention (M3), short- and long-term memory (recall and delayed recall), working memory (0- and 2-back, Operation Span [OSPAN] task), processing speed (Trail Making Test [TMT] A), mental flexibility (TMT B), inhibition (cFlanker and iFlanker), and verbal fluency. CI patients underwent a neurocognitive testing preoperatively as well as 12 months postoperatively. Impact of hearing status, age, gender, and education on cognitive subdomains was studied. Additionally, after controlling for education and age, cognitive performance of CI subjects (<i>n</i> = 41) was compared to that of NH (<i>n</i> = 34). <b><i>Results:</i></b> CI users achieved significantly better neurocognitive scores 12 months after cochlear implantation than before in most subtests (M3, [delayed] recall, 2-back, OSPAN, iFlanker, and verbal fluency; all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05) except for the TMT A and B. A significant correlation could be found between the postoperative improvement in speech perception and in the attentional task M3 (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Hearing status (<i>p</i> = 0.0006) had the strongest effect on attention, whereas education had a high impact on recall (<i>p</i> = 0.002), OSPAN (<i>p</i> = 0.0004), and TMT A (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and B (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Inhibition was mainly age-dependent with better results in younger subjects (<i>p</i> = 0.016). Verbal fluency was predicted by gender as females outperformed men (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Even after controlling for age and education NH subjects showed a significantly better performance than CI candidates in the recall (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and delayed recall (<i>p</i> = 0.01) tasks. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups anymore. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Impact of cochlear implantation on neurocognitive functions differs according to the cognitive subdomains. Postoperatively, CI recipients performed as good as age- and education-matched NH subjects.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Emelly Rusli ◽  
Lihong Diao ◽  
Cynthia Liu ◽  
Mona A Kelkar ◽  
Lisa Ensign ◽  
...  

Background: Past studies have indicated a potential racial disparity in Multiple Myeloma (MM) survival between black and white patients (Costa et al., 2017; Marinac et al., 2020), an issue compounded by minority underrepresentation in clinical trials (Ailawadhi et al., 2018). To better understand how racial disparities affect both MM survival and access to treatment, we performed an analysis of pooled clinical trial (CT) and Real-World EMR Data (RWD). Methods: Eligible Phase II and III open-label MM clinical trials were identified from the Medidata Enterprise Data Store, which comprises over 22,000 historical clinical trials, for de-identified aggregate analyses. De-identified Oncology RWD was sourced from the Guardian Research Network of integrated delivery systems from 2016 to 2020. Baseline characteristics were analyzed in both cohorts. Race was categorized as black, white, or other. Overall Survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. In the RWD, therapy utilization was assessed by race. Results: The RWD contained 5871 patients, with 17.5% black, 78.3% white, and 4.2% other race. Median age in years at diagnosis was 69 for blacks, 72 for whites, and 70 for other races. The gender breakdown was 54.2% female in blacks, 46.0% in whites, 45.9% in those of other races respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 2, with no differences between racial groups. The CT data contained 851 patients, with 1.4% black, 93.5% white, and 5.1% other race. Median age in years at diagnosis was 62 for blacks, 58 for whites, and 55 for other races. The gender breakdown was 33.3% female in blacks, 43.5% in whites, and 46.7% in those of other races respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 5, with no differences between racial groups. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between racial groups in either dataset. In the CT data with median follow-up of 7.8 years, survival from date of diagnosis to last visit or date of death was 25% for blacks and 18% for whites. Currently, in the RWD, 3-year survival comparing blacks to whites is 85% to 83%. The proportion of treated RWD patients appears to be similar between black and white patient groups, with 56% of white and 53% of black patients receiving 1st line therapy, and 33% and 31% receiving 2nd line therapy, respectively. Among newer therapy modalities, white patients had a higher utilization of targeted antibody agent daratumumab (8.7% utilization among whites, 5.2% in blacks, p&lt;0.001), and although not statistically different, proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib use was also higher among whites compared to blacks (6.5% versus 5.5%). Mono daratumumab and ixazomib were used as 1st-line therapy in white patients, while these agents were administered in combination with other treatments in black patients. Adjusting for age and novel therapy use, there was also a suggestion that treatment initiation after diagnosis occurred earlier in whites than blacks (median 1.1 years vs. 1.6 years, p=0.3). Conclusions: Though there were no demonstrated differences in survival between racial groups in either dataset, the RWD suggested differences in treatment utilization, with underutilization of novel therapies like proteasome inhibitors and targeted antibody therapy and later treatment initiation in blacks. Previous studies (Fiala et al., 2017) have noted similar trends, which suggest that therapeutic advances may not be equitably available to all racial groups. This observation could not be replicated in CT data, but merits further exploration. Despite black patients making up 17.5% of patients in the RWD, a racial distribution consistent with published literature (Rosenberg et al., 2015), black patients made up only 1.3% of patients in the CT data. Furthermore, in the CT data, the median age of black patients was older than that of the white and other race groups (62 years compared to 58 and 55, respectively). This observation is magnified by evidence in both the RWD and other datasets (Fillmore et al., 2019) that shows a younger age of onset in black MM patients. Given the strong correlation between age and poorer outcomes in MM (Ludwig et al.,2008), it is possible that these clinical trials are not capturing a representative black patient population, and results may not be generalizable to other groups. Recruitment of black patients should remain a priority in clinical studies in order to effectively assess racial disparities in MM treatment access and survival. Disclosures Rusli: Acorn AI by Medidata, a Dassault Systemes Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Diao:Acorn AI by Medidata, a Dassault Systemes Company: Current Employment. Liu:Acorn AI by Medidata, a Dassault Systemes Company: Current Employment. Kelkar:Acorn AI by Medidata, a Dassault Systemes Company: Current Employment. Ensign:Acorn AI by Medidata, a Dassault Systemes Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Watson:Guardian Research Network, Inc.: Current Employment. Galaznik:Acorn AI by Medidata, a Dassault Systemes Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110558
Author(s):  
James K Sullivan ◽  
Emily A Littlejohn

Background Black patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) face higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to White patients. Long-term glucocorticoid use has been associated with worse health outcomes among patients with SLE. We sought to quantify chronic glucocorticoid use among Black and White patients with SLE within a prospective registry. Methods Using enrollment data from a registry at a large academic institution, we compared glucocorticoid use among Black and White patients with SLE. Multivariable logistic regression of race and glucocorticoid use was performed, adjusting for covariates exhibiting a bivariate association with glucocorticoids at significance level p < 0.10. Results 114 White participants (mean age 45; standard deviation (SD) 15) and 59 Black participants (mean age 42; SD 14) were analyzed. White participants had mean SLEDAI-2K score of 3.7 (SD 5.2). Black participants had mean SLEDAI-2K scores of 6.3 (SD 6.0). Among Black participants, 43 (72%) utilized glucocorticoids compared to White participants 39 (34%) (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.59–10.33). We did not observe differences between unadjusted hydroxychloroquine (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.28–1.65) or conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (cDMARD) (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.57–2.01) utilization among Black and White participants. SLEDAI-2K, disability, recent hospitalization, and past or present hydroxychloroquine or cDMARD use were included in a logistic regression model. Adjusting for covariates, Black participants were more likely to be on glucocorticoids (adjusted OR 5.69; 95% CI 2.17–14.96); p = 0.0004). Conclusion Adjusting for disease activity and other medications, Black patients had more exposure to chronic glucocorticoids than White patients in the Cleveland Clinic SLE registry. These patients may face increased glucocorticoid-related morbidity, which could contribute significantly to long-term health outcomes and utilization of health care resources. Future research in larger, more diverse registries should be conducted to further characterize patterns of glucocorticoid use.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R Jackson ◽  
Kevin L Thomas ◽  
Wojciech Zareba ◽  
Marc Lahiri ◽  
Samir Saba ◽  
...  

Introduction: There are limited data on the risk of inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapy and on the efficacy of different ICD programing strategies as a function of race. Methods: In MADIT-RIT, we evaluated the risk of inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapy by self identified race, and assessed the efficacy of improved ICD programming with either a high rate cut-off VT zone ≥ 200 bpm (Arm B), or long 60 sec delay in the VT zone 170-190 bpm (Arm C), as compared to conventional ICD programming with 2.5 sec delay beginning at 170 bpm (Arm A) among black and white patients. Results: MADIT-RIT enrolled 272 (20%) black and 1119 (80%) white patients. Black patients were younger, more often females, they more often had non-ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy, a narrower QRS and they were less often implanted with CRT-D. The risk of inappropriate ICD therapy was similar among black and white patients (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.82-1.93, P=0.30) after adjustment for relevant covariates. High rate cut-off or delayed VT therapy was associated with significant reductions in inappropriate ICD therapy among white patients (Arm B vs. Arm A, HR 0.15, P<0 .0001, Arm C vs. Arm A, HR 0.19, P 0.10). However, delayed VT therapy (Arm C) when compared to Arm A, was associated with greater reduction in appropriate ICD therapy in black patients (HR 0.08, P<0.0001), as compared to white patients (HR 0.27, P<0.0001, P interaction=0.07). There were no appropriate ICD therapies in the 170-200 bpm range in Arm C with delayed VT therapy programming in black patients, and a further reduction in appropriate ICD therapy ≥ 200 bpm (Arm C vs. Arm A, HR=0.16, p<0.001). Conclusion: In MADIT-RIT, there were similar reductions in inappropriate ICD therapy among black and white patients with improved ICD programming. However, black patients derived more benefit from delayed VT zone programming with greater reduction in appropriate ICD therapy compared to whites, due to a higher rate of self-terminating VT events.


1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean L. Holley ◽  
Judith Bernardini ◽  
Beth Piraino

Objective To determine if black patients in our peritoneal dialysis (PD) program had higher rates of PD-related infections. The outcomes of black patients versus white patients were also reviewed. Design A review of prospectively collected patient demographic and PD-related infection data and out comes, from 1979 to 1991. Patients The 68 black patients in our PD program were matched with white control patients for age, sex, insulin dependence, time on dialysis, and mode of dialysis (CAPD or CCPD). The infection, demographic, and outcome data from the two groups were compared. Results Black patients had higher peritonitis rates (1.10 vs 0.82 episodeslyear, p=0.001) and exit-site infection rates (1.13 vs 0.95 episodeslyear, p=0.02) than the white control patients. Tunnel infection rates were 0.21 episodeslyear in both groups. S. epidermidis peritonitis was more common in black patients (48% of episodes vs 21% of episodes in whites, p=0.005), and S. aureus peritonitis was more common in white patients (29% vs 11% in blacks, p=0.005). The subset of black patients (n=13) on a disconnect system (Y-set) had a peritonitis rate similar to their white controls on the Y-set (0.41 vs 0.74 episodes/year, p=0.27). There were no episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis in this subset of black patients. Black patients had fewer S. aureus exit-site infections than white patients (21% vs 41%, p=0.005). Peritonitis was the leading cause of transfer to hemodialysis in the black patients but not in the white patients. Conclusion The susceptibility to S. aureus and S. epidermidis infections differs in black and white patients on peritoneal dialysis for unclear reasons. Peritonitis rates in black patients can be reduced to that of white patients if a disconnect system is used.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1767-1767
Author(s):  
Ying S Zou ◽  
Yi Huang ◽  
Zhou Feng ◽  
Sin Chan ◽  
Shweta Shukla ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The incidence of MM is 2 to 3 fold higher in blacks than in whites; they present at a younger age and have better overall survival. The biological bases for these disparities remain unclear. Outcome of MM is linked to cytogenetic and molecular changes, both primary (hyperdiploidy and heavy chain (IgH) translocations) and secondary (rearrangements of MYC, activating mutations of NRAS, KRAS or BRAF, and deletions of 17p). Methods: Cytogenomic alterations in consecutive MM patients were assessed using integration of metaphase chromosome analysis by GTG-banding and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) in CD138-positive cells isolated from fresh BM samples using a protocol of magnetic-activated cell sorting. Changes evaluated included monosomy 13/del(13q), monosomy 17/del(17p), gain of 1q21, and rearrangements of the IGH gene including t(4;14), t(11;14) and t(14;16). Results: Samples from 218 consecutive MM patients were analyzed (Table 1). 108 were from black and 110 were from white patients. Median age for blacks was 59 years (range: 36 - 82) and for whites, 63 years (range: 39 - 83) (p=0.008). Fewer black men than whites were observed (46.3% versus 64.6%, p=0.007). Overall, blacks had fewer abnormal karyotypes compared to whites (18.1% versus 31.8%; p=0.02). Black patients had a lower frequency of non-hyperdiploid karyotypes (8.5% versus 20.6%; p=0.01) and had a trend toward lower frequencies of rearrangements of IGH (30.8% versus 43.5%; p=0.055) than white patients. Most notably, they had significantly lower frequencies of monosomy 17/del(17p) (5.6% versus 18.5%; p=0.003) and monosomy 13/del(13q) (28.9% versus 46.3%; p=0.008). After stratification by age (Figure 1), younger patients showed significantly higher frequencies of the monosomy 17/del(17p) abnormality (p=0.001) and the t(4;14) (p=0.04) than older patients, with the difference more significant in white patients. The associations among molecular cytogenetic abnormalities (Figure 2) showed a different association pattern for black and white patients. White patients with t(11;14) were more likely to have monosomy 13/del(13q) (p=0.003) and gain of 1q21 (p=0.02), while this association was not observed in black patients. Conclusion: Black MM patients had significantly different cytogenetic profiles detected by iFISH on CD-138 selected malignant cells, compared to whites. Black MM patients had a more favorable profile, including lower frequencies of non-hyperdiploid karyotype and of IGH rearrangements. This study supports a biological basis for previously described outcome disparities between black and white patients with MM. Further studies will focus on identifying specific molecular targets and their impact on therapy and on overall outcome. Table 1. Demographics and cytogenetic abnormalities of the MM patients Demographics Black White P-value# Total, n 108 110 Gender, n (%) =0.007* Male 50 (46.30%) 71 (64.55%) Female 58 (53.70%) 39 (35.45%) Age (median) 59 63 =0.008* Chromosome (karyotype) =0.022* Normal 86 (81.90%) 73 (68.22%) Abnormal 19 (18.10%) 34 (31.78%) Hyperdiploidy 8 (7.6%) 8 (7.4%) Non-hyperdiploidy 9 (8.5%) 22 (20.6%) =0.013* 11;14 translocation 2 (1.9%) 4 (3.7%) FISH abnormality -13/del(13q) 31 (28.97%) 50 (46.30%) =0.008* Gain of 1q21 35 (32.71%) 47 (43.52%) =0.103 -17/del(17p) 6 (5.61%) 20 (18.52%) =0.003* IGH rearrangements 33 (30.84%) 47 (43.52%) =0.055^ t(4;14) 7 (6.54%) 13 (12.38%) =0.146 t(11;14) 15 (20.55%) 15 (19.48%) =0.870 t(14;16) 2 (3.85%) 6 (10.71%) =0.175 others 16 (14.95%) 15 (13.89%) =0.824 *means statistical significant (p-value < 0.05), where ^ means marginal significant (0.05 < p-value < 0.10). #p-values come from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests for categorical variables, and t tests for continuous variables. Associations among eight molecular cytogenetic abnormalities. Each solid black line indicates one abnormality is statistically significantly associated with another abnormality. Figure 1. Distributions of cytogenetic abnormalities by age and race Figure 1. Distributions of cytogenetic abnormalities by age and race Figure 2. Relationship of various cytogenetic abnormalities in the MM patients Figure 2. Relationship of various cytogenetic abnormalities in the MM patients Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16518-e16518
Author(s):  
Brian E. Lally ◽  
Daniel M. Arsenault

e16518 Background: Access to surgical care and imaging modalities in NSCLC patients are well documented to vary by race/ethnicity. Little information regarding disparities of RT technology usage in NSCLC patients exists. We studied the impact of insurance type on the utilization of radiation technology to investigate this further. Methods: We used the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDS) to create a cohort of adult, pathology-confirmed NSCLC patients who received external beam radiotherapy. Cases of NSCLC were included if they had complete information on date of diagnosis, type of insurance, and race (white or black; others were excluded). Only patients whose radiation therapy codes were either conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were included. The chi square test was used to statistically assess the differences between the groups examined. Results: Our cohort included 2759 (92.7%) white patients and 218 (7.3%) black patients. 3.4% of white patients were uninsured vs 7.8% of black patients (p=0.007). Moreover, there was a statistically significant difference in the utilization of IMRT vs. CRT with respect to race (p=0.003). Specifically, 59.8% of white patients receive IMRT vs 49.5% of black patients. Subset analysis of white patients did not reveal a significant difference in RT technology utilization with respect to insurance status: 53.1% of uninsured white and 61.6% of insured white patients received IMRT (p=ns). However, a similar subset analysis of black patients revealed that only 17.6% of uninsured black patients and 48.5% of insured black patients received IMRT (p=0.045). Conclusions: The utilization of RT technology varied significant with respect to insurance status in the black population. An uninsured black patient is less likely to receive IMRT when compared to an uninsured white patient. Longer follow-up and clinical correlation is needed to determine the clinical significance of this finding, but work is needed rectify any potential disparities with respect to radiation therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. Perreau ◽  
Hua Ou ◽  
Richard Tyler ◽  
Camille Dunn

Purpose The goal of this study was to determine how self-reported spatial hearing abilities differ across various cochlear implant (CI) profiles and to examine the degree of subjective benefit following cochlear implantation across different groups of CI users. Method This was a retrospective study of subjective spatial hearing ability of CI recipients. The subjects consisted of 99 unilateral CI users, 49 bilateral CI users, 32 subjects with a CI and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal users), and 37 short-electrode CI users. All subjects completed the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (Tyler, Perreau, & Ji, 2009), a questionnaire assessing spatial hearing ability, after implantation, and a subset of the subjects completed the questionnaire pre- and postimplantation. Results Subjective spatial hearing ability was rated higher for the bilateral and short electrode CI users compared to the unilateral and bimodal users. There was no significant difference in subjective spatial hearing performance between the bilateral and short electrode CI users and the unilateral CI and bimodal users. A separate analysis of pre- and postimplant performance revealed that all CI groups reported significant improvements in spatial hearing ability after implantation. Conclusion This study suggests that there are substantial differences in perceived spatial hearing ability among unilateral and bimodal CI users compared with bilateral and short electrode CI users.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley A Kaseweter ◽  
Brian B Drwecki ◽  
Kenneth M Prkachin

BACKGROUND: Evidence of inadequate pain treatment as a result of patient race has been extensively documented, yet remains poorly understood. Previous research has indicated that nonwhite patients are significantly more likely to be undertreated for pain.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether previous findings of racial biases in pain treatment recommendations and empathy are generalizable to a sample of Canadian observers and, if so, to determine whether empathy biases mediate the pain treatment disparity.METHODS: Fifty Canadian undergraduate students (24 men and 26 women) watched videos of black and white patients exhibiting facial expressions of pain. Participants provided pain treatment decisions and reported their feelings of empathy for each patient.RESULTS: Participants demonstrated both a prowhite treatment bias and a prowhite empathy bias, reporting more empathy for white patients than black patients and prescribing more pain treatment for white patients than black patients. Empathy was found to mediate the effect of race on pain treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study closely replicate those from a previous study of American observers, providing evidence that a prowhite bias is not a peculiar feature of the American population. These results also add support to the claim that empathy plays a crucial role in racial pain treatment disparity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document