scholarly journals Association between fish intake and glioma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052093969
Author(s):  
Honcho Lei ◽  
Chiho To ◽  
Unpeng Lei
Keyword(s):  
Effect Size ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fish Intake ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Fresh Fish ◽  
Glioma Risk ◽  
The Relationship

Objectives We investigated the association between the consumption of fresh and processed fish and glioma risk using a meta-analysis approach. Methods We selected and analyzed observational studies that discussed the relationships between fresh and processed fish intake on glioma risk from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the SinoMed and Wanfang databases from inception to 31 March 2020. Studies were selected according to pre-established eligibility criteria and data were extracted separately by two researchers. A meta-analysis was conducted based on a random-effects model to provide pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Eight studies considered the relationship between fish intake (seven fresh and seven processed fish) and glioma risk and were included in this meta-analysis. The OR effect size for fresh fish intake and glioma risk was 0.72 (95%CI 0.53–0.97) and the overall OR effect size for processed fish intake and glioma risk was 1.88 (95%CI 1.06–3.34). Conclusion Dietary intake of fresh fish may reduce the risk of glioma, but consumption of processed fish may increase the risk of glioma. This study had some limitations, and further studies are therefore required to clarify the associations between fish intake and glioma risk.

scholarly journals Dietary calcium intake and the risk of metabolic syndrome: evidence from observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2055-2062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lixiao Cheng ◽  
Danqing Hu ◽  
Wenjie Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Calcium Intake ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Cross Sectional Studies

AbstractObjectiveEpidemiological investigations evaluating the association of dietary Ca intake with metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk have yielded controversial results. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively summarize the association between dietary Ca intake and the risk of MetS.DesignPubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles published up to October 2018. The pooled OR and 95 % CI were calculated with a random-effects model.SettingMeta-analysis.ParticipantsNine cross-sectional studies.ResultsA total of nine articles with fifteen studies for dietary Ca intake were finally included in the meta-analysis. The combined OR with 95 % CI of MetS for the highest v. lowest category of dietary Ca intake was 0·80 (95 % CI 0·70, 0·91). For dose–response analysis, a non-linear relationship was found between dietary intake of Ca and risk of MetS (Pnon-linearity<0·001). The threshold for dietary Ca intake was 280 mg/d (OR=0·87; 95 % CI 0·82, 0·93), reducing the risk of MetS by 13 %.ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis suggests that dietary Ca intake might reduce the risk of MetS, which needs to be further confirmed by larger prospective cohort studies.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Music and Food Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2571
Author(s):  
Tianxiang Cui ◽  
Jiaxuan Xi ◽  
Chanyuan Tang ◽  
Jianwen Song ◽  
Jinbo He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Small Effect Size ◽  
The Relationship

Food intake has been shown to be related to several environmental factors including the presence of music. However, previous findings of the relationship between music and food intake are inconsistent. In the present study, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively review the extent to which music is associated with food intake as well as to investigate potential moderators that might have contributed to the heterogeneity of the existing findings. Literature was searched on four databases (i.e., PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) and Google Scholar. Nine articles published from 1989 to 2020 met our inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was carried out via a three-level random-effects model. The overall effect size (i.e., Hedges’ g) was 0.19 (95% Confidence Interval: −0.003, 0.386; SE = 0.10, t = 1.99, p = 0.054), indicating a marginally significant but small effect size. Body Mass Index (F(1, 21) = 5.11, p = 0.035) was found to significantly contribute to the heterogeneity of effect sizes, with larger positive effects of music on food intake for individuals with higher BMI. However, music-related features did not significantly moderate the relationship between music and food intake. More experimental studies are needed to update the current meta-analysis and get a better understanding of this topic.

scholarly journals The effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis on the relationship between the study group size and effect size İşbirlikli öğrenmenin başarıya etkisi: Çalışma grubu ile etki büyüklüğü arasındaki ilişkiye dair bir meta analiz çalışması

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Tuncer ◽  
Melih Dikmen
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Learning Groups ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning on achievement and the relationship between the study group and effect size by means of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is the method employed in order to statistically analyze the quantitative data collected in independent and multiple studies carried out on similar topics, and to reach a general judgment regarding the results of these studies.  Certain criteria were used in order to decide which researches would be included in the meta-analysis. Based on these criteria, it was decided to include 6 experimental studies in the meta-analysis. As a result, for the six studies, the effect size calculated within 95 % confidence interval has proved to be .518 based on random effects model. When two studies with the largest learning groups are excluded from the research respectively, firstly this effect size increases to .528, later it is calculated as .817 without any model discrimination. When effect size intervals in literature (≥ 0.5: strong, ≥ 0.3: moderate and  ≥ .01 weak) is taken into consideration, the effect of cooperative learning on achievement has been observed as  “Strong”. In addition to this, contrary to some views in literature, it has been seen that large learning groups have higher standard errors and a bigger effect size has been achieved when such studies have been excluded from the analysis. What is more, even the limitation of fixed effects model has disappeared, and the effect size calculated in fixed effects and random effects model has been balanced.  ÖzetBu araştırmanın amacı, işbirlikli öğrenmenin başarı üzerindeki etkisini ve çalışma grubu ile etki büyüklüğü arasındaki ilişkiyi meta-analiz yöntemiyle belirlemektir. Meta-analiz, benzer konularda yapılmış birbirinden bağımsız ve çok sayıda çalışmadan elde edilmiş sayısal verileri istatistiksel olarak analiz etme ve bu çalışmaların sonuçları hakkında genel bir yargıya varma yöntemidir. Hangi araştırmaların meta-analize dâhil edileceğine yönelik seçimlerin yapılmasında belirli ölçütler kullanılmıştır. Bu ölçütlere dayalı olarak 6 adet deneysel araştırmanın meta-analize dâhil edilmesine karar verilmiştir. Sonuç olarak; altı çalışma için %95 güven aralığında hesaplanan etki büyüklüğü rastgele etkiler modeline göre .518’dir. En büyük çalışma grubuna sahip iki araştırma sırasıyla araştırma dışında tutulduğunda bu etki büyüklüğü önce .528’ e çıkmakta, sonrasında ise model ayrımı olmaksızın .817 olarak hesaplanmaktadır. Alan yazındaki etki büyüklüğü aralıkları (≥ 0.5: güçlü, ≥ 0.3: orta düzey ve ≥ .01 zayıf) dikkate alındığında işbirlikli öğrenmenin başarı üzerindeki etkisi “Güçlü” bir etki olarak gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca alan yazındaki bazı görüşlerin aksine büyük çalışma gruplarının standart hatalarının daha yüksek olduğu, bu araştırmaların analiz dışında tutulması ile daha büyük etki büyüklüklerine ulaşıldığı, hatta sabit etki modelinin sınırlılığının bile ortadan kalktığı, sabit etki ve rastgele etki modelinde hesaplanan etki büyüklüğünün eşitlendiği görülmüştür.

scholarly journals The Effect of Creative Drama as a Method on Skills: A Meta-analysis Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özgür Ulubey
Keyword(s):  
Effect Size ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Creative Drama ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Moderator Variables ◽  
Data Source

The aim of the current study was to synthesize the findings of experimental studies addressing the effect of the creative drama method on the skills of students. Research data were derived from ProQuest Citations, Web of Science, Google Academic, National Thesis Center, EBSCO, ERIC, Taylor & Francis Online, and ScienceDirect databases using keywords such as drama, and skill. A total of 63 research studies including twenty articles, thirty-four master’s and nine doctoral theses, which met the inclusion criteria of meta-analysis, formed the data source of the current study. The collected data were analyzed by using the Comprehensive Meta Analysis program. To address the heterogeneity of the studies, the random effects model were employed to calculate the effect size. The results of the research showed that creative drama method positively affected the skills of students. In experimental studies, the differences in the effect created by the creative drama on students' skills were examined in terms of moderator variables. While the effect size of creative drama on students’ skills was found to be significantly varying depending on the moderator variables including the duration of experimental application, the level of schooling and the publication type, it was found that the effect size was not significantly varying depending on the moderator variables of practitioner and types of skills.

Circulating chemerin level and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 919-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Qi ◽  
Jiayao Fan ◽  
Jiahao Zhu ◽  
Yuxiao Ling ◽  
Shuai Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
High Level ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Relationship

Aim: Circulating chemerin level has been reported to be higher in patients with various types of cancer. However, the conclusions obtained are not unified. The aim of present study is to draw an evidence-based conclusion on the relationship between circulating chemerin and risk of cancer. Materials & methods: A systematic search was carried out in PubMed and Web of Science up to 30 June 2019. The random-effects model was applied to calculate summary standardized mean differences with 95% CIs. Results: The meta-analysis included a total of 12 separate studies, 876 cases and 739 healthy controls. The results showed that the expression level of circulating chemerin was significantly higher in cancer patients than that in control group (pooled standardized mean difference = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.03–1.90). Conclusion: This meta-analysis concludes that a high level of circulating chemerin is strongly associated with cancer risk.

scholarly journals Risk factors associated with Diabetes Mellitus in COVID-19 infected patients: A meta-analytic synthesis of observational studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upasna Gaba ◽  
Mohammad Altamish ◽  
Md Azharuddin ◽  
Mohammad Adil ◽  
Pinaki Ghosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Review Manager

Aims: We carried out a systematic literature review and meta-analytic synthesis to find out association between DM and related outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, and Web of Science to identify studies investigating comorbidities, clinical manifestations and resource utilization of diabetic patients exposed with COVID-19 published from inception to January 2021. Meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3. Random effects model was used to compute the pooled estimates of odds ratio/mean difference (OR)/(MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Results from the pooled meta-analysis found that CVD, hypertension, AKI, cerebrovascular disease, AKI and ARDS were significantly associated with DM in COVID-19 infected patients compared to non-diabetic patients. There is significant association found between mortality and DM compared to non-diabetic patients [OR (95% CI): 2.46 (1.68, 3.58)]. ICU admission and use of mechanical ventilation was significantly associated with DM and COVID-19 vs. non-diabetic [OR (95% CI): 2.79 (1.79,4.34) and 3.33 (2.05, 5.42)] respectively. However, LOS, hospitalization, and ICU admission were not significantly differing between diabetes vs. non-diabetes. Conclusions: The results showed a significant association between mortality and DM exposed with COVID-19. Other co-morbidities especially CVD/hypertension could be a serious threat for DM COVID-19 infected patients for the higher mortality.

Association between mobile phone use and hearing impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hosein Taziki Balajelini ◽  
Masoud Mohammadi ◽  
Abdolhalim Rajabi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Mobile Phone ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mobile Phone Use

Abstract Objectives To investigate whether a possible association of mobile phone use with hearing impairment was conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Content This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was carried out based on the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) methodology using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, OVID, and Cochrane. The Robins-I tool was used for quality assessment and risk of bias. Two investigators independently reviewed all articles. Pooled effect size was calculated and meta-analysis was performed to compute an overall effect size. Summary Overall, five relevant studies (two cross-sectional and three cohort studies) with 92,978 participants were included in the analysis. The studies were stratified by design, there was no significant association between mobile phone use and hearing impairment in cross-sectional studies (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.57–1.31) and cohort studies (OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.93–1.25). In addition, the effect estimates did not differ significantly between cross-sectional and cohort studies (Q=0.50, p=0.48). Overall, the pooled odds ratio (OR) of hearing impairment was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94–1.20), which indicates no significant association between mobile phone use and hearing impairment. Outlook Our findings indicate no association between mobile phone use and hearing impairment. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agents in patients with COVID-19 a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Hu ◽  
Baohui Song
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Coagulopathy and thrombotic events have been reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) frequently. However, the use of antiplatelet agents in COVID-19 is yet to be investigated. This article systematically reviewed the relationship between use of antiplatelet agents and major outcomes of COVID-19 patients. In total, 12 studies met our eligibility criteria. Due to high heterogeneity, we excluded three studies with high risk of bias. The result showed that antiplatelet therapy did not related to a higher mortality of COVID-19 patients (OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.77-1.33, I2=0%, P=0.88). However, the use of antiplatelet agents was associated with a lower risk of ICU admission (OR=0.63, 95% CI= 0.40-0.98, I2=0%, P=0.68) and mechanical ventilation (OR=0.57, 95% CI= 0.38-0.85, I2=0%, P=0.75) compared with those without antiplatelets. In conclusion, current results did not support that antiplatelets will cause greater mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Antiplatelet agents should be continued in COVID-19 patients, unless clinically indicated.

The Relationship Between Immorality and Cleansing

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jedidiah Siev ◽  
Shelby E. Zuckerman ◽  
Joseph J. Siev
Keyword(s):  
Effect Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract. In a widely publicized set of studies, participants who were primed to consider unethical events preferred cleansing products more than did those primed with ethical events ( Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006 ). This tendency to respond to moral threat with physical cleansing is known as the Macbeth Effect. Several subsequent efforts, however, did not replicate this relationship. The present manuscript reports the results of a meta-analysis of 15 studies testing this relationship. The weighted mean effect size was small across all studies (g = 0.17, 95% CI [0.04, 0.31]), and nonsignificant across studies conducted in independent laboratories (g = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.19]). We conclude that there is little evidence for an overall Macbeth Effect; however, there may be a Macbeth Effect under certain conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document