Efficacy of Iron Therapy: A Comparative Evaluation of Four Iron Preparations Administered to Anaemic Pregnant Women

1985 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Fochi ◽  
M Ciampini ◽  
G Ceccarelli

The authors conducted a clinical investigation on sixty-nine pregnant women, anaemic and non-anaemic, the purpose being to assess the effect of 50 days treatment with four different medicinal iron preparations, namely, ferrous sulphate, iron chondroitinsulfuric acid complex, and ferritin alone or associated with folinic acid and cobamamide, on various haematological parameters (Hb, RCC, Ht, CV, Iron, and Transferrin IBC). The four products demonstrated a similar efficacy in maintaining anaemic conditions under control; moreover, the results confirmed our hypothesis of the absorption of iron ferritin. While three products were well tolerated, ferrous sulphate induced, in some cases, side-effects.

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Prema Ramachandran ◽  
Amrita Pramanik ◽  
K. Kalaivani

In India prevalence of anaemia and vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy are widespread. National programmes recommend that two tablets of iron and folic acid (IFA) and two tablets of calcium and vitamin D (Ca & Vit D) to be given every day from second trimester till delivery. To minimize the side effects and increase compliance, it is advised that each tablet should be taken after a meal. Most households follow a three meal pattern. A study was taken up to find out how IFA and Ca & Vit D supplementations can be fitted into the habitual three meal pattern. A short term crossover supplementation study was carried out on 38 pregnant women to assess side effects following consumption after lunch of one or two tablets containing 500mg elemental calcium (as calcium carbonate) and 250 IU vitamin D or 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate. Prevalence of side effects was higher in women who received iron supplements as compared to Ca & Vit D supplements. Taking two tablets of Ca & Vit D together after meal was associated with significantly higher prevalence of side effects as compared to taking one tablet after meal. Taking two tablets of iron together after meal was not associated with any significant increase in prevalence of side effects as compared to one tablet. Giving two tablets of iron together after one meal and giving one tablet of calcium and vitamin after two meals is feasible option for providing two tablets each of iron and Ca & Vit D to pregnant women who habitually follow a three meal pattern.


Author(s):  
Uma Maheswari R. ◽  
R. Veerakumaran

Background: In India, women become pregnant with low baseline hemoglobin level resulting in high incidence of moderate to severe anemia in pregnancy where oral iron therapy cannot meet the requirement. Pregnant women with moderate anemia are to be treated with parenteral iron therapy. The aim of the study is to the infusion of intravenous iron sucrose and its outcome in the management of anemia.Methods: Totally 100 pregnant females were included in the study. The study period was from January 2018-July 2018 at vanavil medical center in Chennai. 50 Patients of Group A was given oral iron tablets containing100mg of elemental iron. 50 patients of Group B was given a total of 1000 mg of intravenous iron sucrose divided into five doses of 200 mg each at weekly intervals. Estimation of hemoglobin was started 4 weeks after commencement of iron therapy and then repeated every 4 weeks till 36 weeks of gestation, pre-delivery and postpartum.Results: Target hemoglobin levels were achieved in 4 weeks’ time in 19 (76%) patients in the iron sucrose group as compared to 08 (32%) of patients in the oral iron group. There was a significant improvement in the various hematological parameters in iv sucrose group as compared to patients in the oral iron group. There were no significant allergic reactions in iv sucrose group.Conclusions: Our results showed that intravenous iron sucrose therapy was effective to treat moderate anemia in pregnant women. Intramuscular preparations are known to be associated with local side-effects. Iron sucrose complex iv therapy was with negligible side effects. It caused a rapid rise in hemoglobin level and the replacement of stores was faster. Long term comparative studies are required to assess if they can be used at a peripheral level.


QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T F Borg ◽  
K M Labib ◽  
G M Darwish

Abstract Background Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the condition in which there is decrease in the number of red blood cells or the amount of hemoglobin in the blood. It is caused by insufficient dietary intake and absorption of iron, or iron loss from bleeding. Bleeding can be from a range of sources such as the intestinal, uterine or urinary tract. Aim of the Work to compare the efficacy and the safety of lactoferrin versus ferrous sulphate for the treatment of iron deficiency pregnant women. Patients and Methods This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 98 women selected from pregnant women attending the antenatal outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Maternity hospital. All patients were divided into two groups; the first group included 49 pregnant women who received lactoferrin (Pravotin100 mg sachets, Hygint pharmaceuticals, Egypt) twice daily orally for 30 days which was dissolved in 1/4 glass of water before meals by 15 minutes. The second group included 49 pregnant women who received 520 mg of dried ferrous sulphate tablets (Feosol tablets, Meda pharmaceuticals, Egypt) once daily orally for 30 days on empty stomach but may be taken with meals to avoid stomach upset. Results Total increase in HB after 1month with lactoferrin was higher compared to ferrous sulfate (-13.572 gdl)(p < 0.001). Gastroinestinal adverse events occurred more frequently with ferrous sulfate than the lactoferrin group (p < 0.001).The number of women requesting change the drug was higher in the ferrous sulfate group(p < 0.001). Conclusion Oral lactoferrin was better tolerated and more acceptable with higher increase in mean hemoglobin when compared to oral iron therapy over one month treatment. Oral lactoferrin can be used as a good substitute to oral iron therapy in iron deficiency during pregnancy.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1341
Author(s):  
Oliver Phipps ◽  
Hafid O. Al-Hassi ◽  
Mohammed N. Quraishi ◽  
Edward A. Dickson ◽  
Jonathan Segal ◽  
...  

Iron deficiency anemia is a common complication of colorectal cancer and may require iron therapy. Oral iron can increase the iron available to gut bacteria and may alter the colonic microbiota. We performed an intervention study to compare oral and intravenous iron therapy on the colonic tumor-associated (on-tumor) and paired non-tumor-associated adjacent (off-tumor) microbiota. Anemic patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma received either oral ferrous sulphate (n = 16) or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (n = 24). On- and off-tumor biopsies were obtained post-surgery and microbial profiling was performed using 16S ribosomal RNA analysis. Off-tumor α- and β-diversity were significantly different between iron treatment groups. No differences in on-tumor diversity were observed. Off-tumor microbiota of oral iron-treated patients showed higher abundances of the orders Clostridiales, Cytophagales, and Anaeroplasmatales compared to intravenous iron-treated patients. The on-tumor microbiota was enriched with the orders Lactobacillales and Alteromonadales in the oral and intravenous iron groups, respectively. The on- and off-tumor microbiota associated with intravenous iron-treated patients infers increased abundances of enzymes involved in iron sequestration and anti-inflammatory/oncogenic metabolite production, compared to oral iron-treated patients. Collectively, this suggests that intravenous iron may be a more appropriate therapy to limit adverse microbial outcomes compared to oral iron.


Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 552
Author(s):  
Phiona Nalubega ◽  
Emilie Karafillakis ◽  
Lydia Atuhaire ◽  
Pamela Akite ◽  
Flavia Zalwango ◽  
...  

Background: We investigated pregnant women, community leaders, healthcare workers (HCWs) and programme managers’ perceptions of maternal vaccination in Kampala, Uganda. Methods: We conducted focus group discussions, key informant interviews and in-depth discussions with HCWs (3), community leaders (3), pregnant women (8) and programme managers (10) between November 2019 and October 2020. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Pregnant women, community leaders and some HCWs had limited maternal immunisation knowledge. There was confusion over what constitutes a vaccine. Pregnant women may not receive vaccines because of mistrust of government; use of expired vaccines; reliance on traditional medicine; religious beliefs; fear of side effects; HCWs attitudes; and logistical issues. The key facilitators of maternal vaccination were a desire to prevent diseases, positive influences from HCWs and information about vaccine side effects. Community leaders and some pregnant women highlighted that pregnant women do not make decisions about maternal vaccination independently and are influenced by different individuals, including other pregnant women, older people, partners, relatives (parents), community leaders, HCWs and the government. Conclusions: Our results indicate that public health messaging should target all community members, including partners and parents of pregnant women as well as HCWs, to improve knowledge of and confidence in maternal vaccines.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beuth J ◽  
◽  
Böwe R ◽  

This clinical investigation was performed to evaluate the benefit of Complementary Medicine (CM) in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant Chemotherapy (ChT). Patients and Methods: The patients (n=668) were treated according to international guidelines with adjuvant ChT. As to reduce the side effects, the patients were complementarily treated with a combination of sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes (bromelaine and papain) and Lens culinaris lectin. On Case Report Formulas (CRFs) assessment of side effects of ChT was documented at defined times during adjuvant ChT and additional complementary treatment. Validation was carried out by scoring from 1 (no side-effects/optimal tolerability) to 6 (extreme side-effects/extremely bad tolerability), however, only patients suffering from severe side effects (symptom scores 4 and higher) were enrolled into this investigation. Results: The severity of side-effects of ChT was significantly reduced by complementary treatment. Mean scores of symptoms declined for sleep disorder, fatigue, lack of drive (p<0.05) and for arthralgia, hot flushes, mucosal dryness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of appetite, pain of tumour (p<0.001). Conclusion: This investigation confirms benefits of indication-based complementary treatment with the combination of sodium selenite, proteolytic enzymes and Lens culinaris lectin in breast cancer patients, e.g. reduction of side-effects of adjuvant ChT.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Aslan ◽  
Ahmet Özmeriç ◽  
Ökkeş Bilal ◽  
Fatih Doğar ◽  
Zübeyde Özkaya ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2s) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
Tigor Peniel Simanjuntak ◽  
◽  
Angela Putri Kakerissa ◽  
Grady Ivan Kurniawan

Abstract Objective to evaluate antiviral treatment, duration, and side effects on pregnant women based on gestational age and severity of COVID-19 infection. Method: a systematic review of antiviral treatment, duration, and side effects on pregnant women based on gestational age and severity of COVID-19 infection. Systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement. Result 948 papers accessed through Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cohcrane, and other with keywords “Antiviral”, “Pregnancy” “Pregnant” “Coronavirus” “COVID-19” “SARS-CoV-2”. Duplicate papers were excluded (n=302), topics and abstracts that do not meet the criteria (n=612), and 25 papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria. 9 papers that meet the inclusion criteria (case reports and cohort retrospective case study) discussed 20 pregnant women with COVID-19 infection (16 moderate and severe cases received Remdesivir, 3 moderate and mild cases received Lopinavir-ritonavir combination, and 1 moderate case received Arbidol). Conclusion, remdesivir is an antiviral frequently used in pregnancy on trimester II and III with severe COVID-19 infection with a duration of treatment of 5-10 days. Remdesivir should be monitored because some show side effects of increasing liver function. Key word: Antiviral, Pregnant, COVID-19


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document