Efficacy and Clinical Tolerance of a New Combination of Trimethoprim with Sulphonamide

1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 236-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Celotti ◽  
Franklin Nüdemberg ◽  
Osvaldo Magni ◽  
Francesca Piaia

To obtain a direct clinical evaluation of a new sulpha-trimethoprim combination product (Kelfiprim®) from general practitioners or specialist practitioners, an extensive post-marketing survey has been organized in Brazil involving 1,177 doctors and 5,885 patients. These experienced different infections susceptible to oral antimicrobial chemotherapy with a sulpha-trimethoprim combination. The results indicated that the product was very effective (91.2% cure rate) and well tolerated (4% incidence of side-effects). Side-effects were usually mild and transient. No life-threatening adverse reactions were observed. The results obtained support those already published in clinical trials involving 1,119 patients.

Pathogens ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Tzu-Chuan Ho ◽  
Yung-Hsuan Wang ◽  
Yi-Ling Chen ◽  
Wan-Chi Tsai ◽  
Che-Hsin Lee ◽  
...  

Chloroquine (CQ) and its derivative, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), have attracted wide attention for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, conflicting outcomes have been found in COVID-19 clinical trials after treatment with CQ or HCQ. To date, it remains uncertain whether CQ and HCQ are beneficial antiviral drugs for combating COVID-19. We performed a systematic review to depict the efficacy of CQ or HCQ for the treatment of COVID-19. The guidelines of PRISMA were used to conduct this systematic review. We searched through articles from PubMed, Web of Science and other sources that were published from 1 January 2020 to 31 October 2020. The search terms included combinations of human COVID-19, CQ, and HCQ. Eleven qualitative articles comprising of four clinical trials and seven observation studies were utilized in our systematic review. The analysis shows that CQ and HCQ do not have efficacy in treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. In addition, CQ and HCQ have caused life-threatening adverse reactions which included cardiac arrest, electrocardiogram modification, and QTc prolongation, particularly during the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. Our systematic review suggested that CQ and HCQ are not beneficial antiviral drugs for curing patients with severe COVID-19. The treatment effect of CQ and HCQ is not only null but also causes serious side effects, which may cause potential cardiotoxicity in severe COVID-19 patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahbubeh Setorki

Depression is a life-threatening chronic illness which affects people worldwide. Drugs used to treat this disease have multiple side effects and may cause drug-drug or drug-food interactions. Additionally, only 30% of patients respond adequately to the existing drugs and the remaining do not achieve complete recovery. Thus, finding effective treatments that have adequate efficacy, fewer side effects and lower cost seem to be necessary. The purpose of this study was to review animal and double-blind clinical studies on the anti-depressant effects of medicinal herbs. In this study, validated scientific articles indexed in PubMed, SID, Web of Science and Scopus databases were reviewed. A database search was performed using the following terms: clinical trials, depression, major depressive disorder, essential oil, extract and medicinal plant. Positive effects of a number of herbs and their active compounds such as St John’s-wort, saffron, turmeric, ginkgo, chamomile, valerian, Lavender, Echium amoenum and Rhodiola rosea L. in improvement of symptoms of mild, moderate or major depression have been shown in clinical trials. The above plants show antidepressant effects and have fewer side effects than synthetic drugs. Hence, they have the potential to treat patients with depression.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3490-3490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie E Zettler ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Bruce Feinberg

Introduction: Registry data indicate that 20% or more of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are ≥60; these HL patients have been labeled as elderly as their treatment has been associated with more toxicity, a higher relapse rate, and greater mortality relative to younger patients. The characteristics of HL in elderly patients differ from those in younger patients and may represent a biologically more aggressive disease. Further, elderly patients generally have a greater comorbidity burden than their younger counterparts, which may contribute to their under-representation in clinical trials. Nivolumab (NIVO) and pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) are both approved for treating relapsed/refractory HL based on studies that largely enrolled younger patients, as only about 10% of enrolled patients in the pivotal trials that led to their United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval were ≥60 years of age. Whether adverse events (AEs) related to these immunotherapies differ between younger and older HL patients is unknown and may have important clinical and practice implications. Therefore, we reviewed all post-marketing case reports from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) Database involving NIVO or PEMBRO for HL and compared AEs and outcomes by age. Methods: The FAERS database is a repository of anonymized reports for product-related AEs, classified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and categorized as serious or non-serious. The database was queried for cases involving NIVO or PEMBRO (and their respective trade names) from the FDA approval date for the HL indication (May 17, 2016 for NIVO; March 14, 2017 for PEMBRO) through March 31, 2019. Cases were excluded if the age of the patient was unknown, or if the case was reported outside the US. Comparisons of rates of AEs by age group were made using Fisher's exact test; statistical significance was determined at a two-sided α=0.05. Results: A total of 126 cases were retrieved (117 involving NIVO, 9 involving PEMBRO). One hundred and fourteen of the 126 cases (90%) were categorized as serious. Median age of all patients involved was 56 (range 10-89); 53 of the cases (42%) involved patients age 60 or older (Table). Overall, 8 cases had an outcome categorized as life-threatening; 20 cases resulted in death; 2 resulted in disability; and 74 resulted in hospitalization. A higher proportion of cases involving younger patients were categorized under the reaction group "neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified" (16% vs. 2%; p<0.01), and older patients had a greater incidence of infectious complications compared with their younger counterparts, though this was marginally significant (40% vs. 23%; p=0.05). The proportion of cases resulting in hospitalization was significantly higher in the ≥60 age group as compared to the <60 age group (79% vs. 44%; p <0.01). Adverse reactions that were common in clinical trials, such as fatigue, pyrexia, headache, peripheral neuropathy, upper respiratory tract infection, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, did not show any significant associations by age group (all p values >0.05). Conclusions: Although elderly patients comprise 20% of the HL patient population in the US, our post-marketing analysis indicates that AEs in this subgroup account for more than 40% of the total. This suggests that elderly HL patients experience a disproportional number of AEs compared to younger HL patients. While the types of AEs reported in post-marketing cases generally paralleled those observed in clinical trials of HL patients receiving NIVO or PEMBRO, hospitalizations and infections were more common in the elderly group. These differences in the adverse reactions and safety outcomes associated with PD-1 blockade therapy in HL patients may help inform clinical care and monitoring for AEs. Despite the inherent limitations of this study, our findings complement clinical trial safety data and provide insight into real-world trends in reported safety signals that merit further study. Disclosures Zettler: Cardinal Health: Employment. Nabhan:Aptitude Health: Employment. Gajra:Cardinal Health: Employment. Feinberg:Cardinal Health: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
Selly Cintya Gusman ◽  
Raveinal Raveinal

<em>Giving drugs to some patients has the potential to experience side effects that can be life-threatening so doctors must provide alternative medicine to them. If the suspect's drug is not replaced by alternative medicine, drug desensitization can be carried out. Drug desensitization is a temporary induction of a state of tolerance to the drug. Although this therapy is only empirical, it is effective and with a better understanding of the mechanism of desensitization is expected to improve therapeutic methods. Considerations for determining desensitization protocols do not have to be rigid, they should follow a number of steps, namely patient evaluation aimed at finding the characteristics of adverse reactions in patients, determining the possibility of effective and safe fast drug desensitization, selecting appropriate protocols, gathering information about the patient's response to desensitization, and change the protocol as needed. Desensitization is said to be successful if the patient can complete up to the therapeutic dose and can tolerate repeated dosing until treatment is complete.</em>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Jubayer ◽  
Shahidullah Kayshar ◽  
Anisur Rahman Mazumder ◽  
Syeda Sabrina Akter

The spread of pandemic coronavirus disease-2019 has become a health emergency worldwide. Since the unprecedented outbreak, attention has been raised worldwide to develop and research for control options and treatments. Although several clinical trials are ongoing, no registered drugs or vaccines are available yet. As situation warrants for the exploration of a successful antiviral, there should be a search for the remedies in nature also. Medicinal plants and their metabolites have long been used as a treatment option for various life-threatening diseases with minimal or no side effects. Thus this review aims to summarize previous outcomes concerning the role of medicinal plants in treating several life-threatening diseases. Above all, this work intends to find the constituents of five selected medicinal plants and their possible working mechanisms in the management of COVID-19. Constituents of the presented medicinal plants possess excellent pharmacological properties, including significant antiviral and antimicrobial potential. Based on the traditional uses, pharmacological properties, and previous studies, these medicinal plants mentioned in this review can be considered as a possible therapeutic option for the management and treatment of COVID-19. However, further extensive researches and trials are suggested to discover specific effects and dosage for this pathogenic outbreak.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4184-4184
Author(s):  
Bhawna Rastogi ◽  
Sunita Rani ◽  
Meiko Mayuzumi ◽  
Rafael Razon ◽  
Rajani Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: L-glutamine (Endari ®) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2017 to reduce the acute complications of sickle cell disease (SCD) in adult and pediatric patients, aged 5 years and older. Data collected during the phase 2 and phase 3 trials demonstrated a rather mild adverse event profile at the approved doses (approximately 0.3 g/kg administered twice daily). The combined data from the clinical trials encompassed 187 patients assigned to the L-glutamine arm and 111 patients assigned to the placebo arm. The most common side effects observed were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain. Since 2017, safety data for L-glutamine has been collected through several sources. Aim: To determine whether new safety concern signals for L-glutamine in the treatment of SCD have emerged over the post-marketing period since July of 2017. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSR) received from consumers, physicians, pharmacies, and other healthcare professionals that were processed in the global safety database in real time were reviewed. Continuous safety evaluations that were performed when evaluating ICSRs were collected. Additionally, signal management activities performed quarterly since July 2017, which included screening of literature and regulatory websites for the identification of potential safety information, were evaluated. Results: Overall, 1791 case reports were received with 2954 adverse events between July 07, 2017 (the date of approval) and July 06, 2021. A summary of frequently reported adverse events during the post-marketing phase is presented in Figure 1. No new safety concerns have been identified upon evaluation of these events, which has been performed on a quarterly basis from the approval date. Conclusion: Post-marketing surveillance data indicates that L-glutamine administered at approximately 0.3 g/kg twice daily is safe and well-tolerated. The most common side effects observed during clinical trials were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain (Table 1). These same side effects have been observed in the post-marketing phase with the exception of "cough." Side effects reported during the post-marketing phase that were not reported in the clinical trials were abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, malaise, and pain. The majority of these reports were categorized as non-serious (Figure 1). Information pertaining to these events was limited or the event could be explained by the underlying condition or concomitant medication; therefore, these events were not considered to be new safety concerns. In summary, there were no new safety concerns identified with L-glutamine for the treatment of SCD in the post-marketing period. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mayuzumi: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Razon: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Singh: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Goodrow: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Becerra: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Stark: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Niihara: Emmaus Lifesciences, Inc.: Current Employment.


Author(s):  
Balaji Ommurugan ◽  
Amita Priya ◽  
Navin Patil

Anticancer therapy is always known to cause various side effects. L-asparaginase used in the treatment of adult T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia is anovel class of drug, an enzyme produced from plants as well as microorganisms except human. It is known to cause various adverse reactions including life-threatening neurological complications and thrombotic disorders. Hence, we report a case of hypofibrinogenemia associated with L-asparaginase in a patient treated for T-cell adult lymphoblastic leukemia.Keywords: L-asparaginase, Hypofibrinogenemia, Adverse effect, Leukemia.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Irina Piatkov ◽  
Trudi Jones

The variation in individual responses to psychotropic drug treatment remains a critical problem in the management of psychotic disorders. Although most patients will experience remission, some patients may develop drug-induced adverse effects that may range from troublesome to life threatening. Antidepressants are freely prescribed by general practitioners, and there should be constant awareness in the medical community about possible serious side effects. We describe two cases of adverse drug reactions on low dosage treatment that led to extreme psychotic episodes as examples of the potential for dangerous side effects. The patients developed adverse reactions on the normal recommended dosage of nortriptyline, a tricyclics antidepressant (TCA). Both were females, with no history of antidepressant treatment, unsocial behaviour, nor any family history of psychosis, but both experienced severe psychiatric symptoms. Pharmacogenetic tests can easily be performed and interpreted according to the likelihood of adverse reactions and should be included in toxicity interpretation.


Author(s):  
Ke Lu ◽  
Xiaoyan Wu ◽  
Runming Jin ◽  
Hongbo Chen

In recent years, the consumption of over-the-counter probiotics used to promote health has grown rapidly worldwide and become an industry. In medicine, various studies have proven that probiotics can help improve the immune system and intestinal health. They are usually safe, but in some rare cases, they may cause concerning adverse reactions. Although the use of probiotics has been widely popularized in the public, the results of many probiotics clinical trials are contradictory. Especially for the cancer patients, the feasibility of probiotics management to provide benefits by targeting cancer and lessening anti-cancer side effects requires further investigations. And this review summarizes the interactions between probiotics and the host and current pros and cons of applying probiotics in the cancer patients.


Dermatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 236 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zarqa Ali ◽  
John Robert Zibert ◽  
Simon Francis Thomsen

Background: The cost of developing a new drug is approximately USD 2.6 billion, and over two-thirds of the total cost is embedded in the clinical-testing phase. Patient recruitment is the single biggest cause of clinical trial delays, and these delays can result in up to USD 8 million per day in lost revenue for pharmaceutical companies. Further, clinical trials struggle to keep participants engaged in the study and as many as 40% drop out. To overcome these challenges pharmaceutical companies and research institutions (e.g., universities) increasingly use an emerging concept: virtual clinical trials (VCT) based on a remote approach. Summary: VCT (site-less) are a relatively new method of conducting a clinical trial, taking full advantage of technology (apps, monitoring devices, etc.) and inclusion of web platforms (recruitment, informed consent, counselling, measurement of endpoints, and any adverse reactions) to allow the patient to be home-based at every stage of the clinical trial. Studies have shown that VCT are not only operationally feasible, but also successful. They have higher recruitment rates, better compliance, lower drop-out rates, and are conducted faster than traditional clinical trials. The visual nature of dermatological conditions, the relative ease in evaluating skin diseases virtually, and the fact that skin diseases often are not life-threatening and rarely require complex examinations make VCT very attractive for dermatological research. Further, making correct diagnoses based on photographs and patient symptomatology has always been part of the dermatologist’s routine. Thus, VCT are in many ways made for dermatology. Herein we describe VCT and their implications in dermatological research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document