scholarly journals Factors Affecting Satisfaction with the Process of Orthodontic Treatment in Young Adults: A Questionnaire Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
Sujit Navnath Zadake ◽  
Suresh K. Kangane ◽  
Anand S. Ambekar ◽  
Mahendra Kondle ◽  
Radhika Kalekar
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Clear Correlation ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Satisfaction With Treatment

Introduction: Recently, there has been an increase in adults undergoing orthodontic treatment in both the public and the private sector. Satisfaction during and after the orthodontic treatment process has not been widely discussed so far, however, and few research studies have emphasized patient satisfaction with treatment outcome and the factors affecting patient satisfaction. Aim: To investigate factors affecting patient satisfaction with the process of orthodontic treatment in young adults. Material and methods: Fifty-eight patients (33 girls and 25 boys with a mean age of 25.05 years, SD 2.83) were included in the survey. All patients were young adults who had completed their orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and were taken from two centers (a teaching hospital and a private practice). Data was collected using online survey forms and was analyzed using content thematic analysis. Five main factors were identified related to patient satisfaction with the process of orthodontic treatment: communication, faculty (orthodontist), physical surroundings, consultation/appointments, and impact of appliance treatment. Results: Effective communication was the most prominent factor among all five factors considered, especially detailed explanation given during treatment and making patients feel comfortable under their care. Median values were generally high for satisfaction with treatment results. There was a clear correlation ( p < 0.001) between patient satisfaction and treatment outcome. Age, sex and treatment time did not have any correlation with treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: In general, young adults were observed to be satisfied with the treatment process, and good communication played a dominant role in this. Though there were many differences in working models between public and private sectors, many similarities were observed when comparing the factors between the two centers.

scholarly journals Factors affecting orthodontic treatment time and how to predict it

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rania Adel Mitwally ◽  
Laila Marzooq Alesawi ◽  
Adhwaa Yahya Humedi ◽  
Saleh Saeed Al Baaltahin ◽  
Yara Ahmed Saeedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Underlying Condition ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Speed Up

Orthodontic treatment time has been associated with certain parameters that can affect the different aspects of treatment regards to the patient and orthodontist. Therefore, a large set of research has focused on studying these factors. Many factors have been proposed in the literature as significant predictors for prolonged orthodontic treatment duration. In general, these factors are related to the patient, orthodontist, procedure, and severity of the underlying condition. Acquiring more knowledge about these factors can help orthodontists speed up the treatment plan, which might enhance the treatment outcomes and enhance the levels of satisfaction. In the current study, we have provided updated evidence regarding the different factors affecting orthodontic treatment time according to evidence from studies in the literature. Many factors were reported, including factors related to the procedure and the underlying condition, and factors related to the patient and orthodontist. Increasing knowledge and experience of the orthodontist might increase the level of satisfaction as it has been reported to significantly reduce the treatment duration. However, this should be accompanied by adequate patient compliance, which was also reported to be a significant predictor for prolonged treatment duration. Investigating the application of recent modalities that can speed up the treatment plan is not adequately validated, indicating the need for future validating studies.

scholarly journals Patient Satisfaction Based on IOL Implantation Results

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-826
Author(s):  
M. E. Konovalov ◽  
K. V. Burdel ◽  
M. L. Zenina ◽  
A. B. Reznikova ◽  
M. M. Konovalova
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Subjective Satisfaction ◽  
Preoperative Stage ◽  
Ophthalmic Pathology ◽  
Satisfaction With Treatment

Purpose: to found the relationship between the obtained postoperative visual acuity, the increase in visual acuity in the lines and the subjective satisfaction of patients with the results of the operation.Material and methods. The study included 165 patients (186 eyes) who received cataract phacoemulsification surgery with IOL implantation (n = 170) or refractive lensectomy with IOL implantation (n = 16). The average age of the subjects was 70.23 ± 10.14 years. The group included patients without concomitant systemic or ophthalmic pathology, without previous surgical interventions in the eye for any purpose. At least 1 month after the operation, patients filled out a questionnaire in order to find out the subjective satisfaction with the treatment (scale from 0 to 4 points). The results of the questionnaire were compared with postoperative BCVA, and increased vision (postoperative BCVA — preoperative BCVA). Preoperative BCVA — Me 0.4 (Q1–Q3: 0.1–0.68), postoperative BCVA — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.95–1.0), increased vision — Me 0.6 (Q1–Q3: 0.3–0.9) according to Snellen’s table.Results. Visual acuity in satisfaction subgroups: 0 points — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.9–1.0) / n = 5 (2.7 %); 1 point — 1 case, postoperative BCVA 1.16 (0.5 %); 2 points — Me 0.95 (Q1–Q3: 0.84–1.0) / n = 14 (7.5 %); 3 points — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.9–1.16) / n = 57 (30.6 %); 4 points — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.96–1.0) / n = 109 (58.6 %). Postoperative BCVA and increased in visual acuity do not have statistically significant differences depending on satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05). The correlation between postoperative BCVA and satisfaction is not statistically significant (p = 0.65; rxy = 0.136), as well as between vision improvement and satisfaction (p = 0.55; rxy = 0.141).Conclusion. There was a lack of a statistically significant relationship between postoperative BCVA and improved vision with subjective patient satisfaction with treatment. Identification of factors affecting subjective assessment requires a deeper analysis. Practicing ophthalmologists should remember the importance of the dialogue between the doctor and the patient at the preoperative stage, informing the patient about the expected results of the operation and the possible course after the operation period.

Factors affecting adherence and patient satisfaction with treatment: a cross-sectional study of 500 patients with acne vulgaris

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yıldız Hayran ◽  
Pınar İncel Uysal ◽  
Ayşe Öktem ◽  
Güneş Gür Aksoy ◽  
Neslihan Akdoğan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Satisfaction With Treatment

Testing a New Theory of Patient Satisfaction With Treatment Outcome

Medical Care ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 726-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela L. Hudak ◽  
Sheilah Hogg-Johnson ◽  
Claire Bombardier ◽  
Patricia D. McKeever ◽  
James G. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Satisfaction With Treatment

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Dermatology

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-547
Author(s):  
Abigail Cline ◽  
Tamar Gomolin ◽  
Bijan Safai
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Improve Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Scores ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Insight Into

Background: Patient satisfaction is a proxy for healthcare quality, with physicians evaluated and reimbursed based on patient satisfaction scores. Despite the growing influence of patient satisfaction, factors that impact patient satisfaction in dermatology remain unclear. Methods: We analyzed 225 responses to an online survey evaluating patient expectations, willingness, and satisfaction regarding dermatology appointments. Patient willingness and satisfaction were measured on a 1-5 Likert scale.  Results: Respondents were most willing to discuss their condition and to be examined with a dermatoscope. Respondents were least willing to wear a patient gown without underwear and to be photographed. Highly satisfying factors included a written treatment plan, provider medication recommendations, and use of gloves during physical exams. Highly dissatisfying factors included waiting 60 minutes, taking off underwear with a patient gown, and being photographed with a cellphone.Patient willingness and satisfaction differed significantly by gender and age. Male respondents reported less satisfaction than female respondents if a nurse explained the treatment plan. Older respondents were significantly more willing to change into a patient gown, to be photographed, to be examined with a dermatoscope, and to undergo a biopsy than younger respondents. Older and female respondents preferred written plans, while younger and male respondents preferred verbal plans.  Younger respondents reported higher satisfaction with an email follow-up compared to older respondents, who preferred a phone call.Conclusion: These findings may represent relatively easy ways to improve patient satisfaction scores. Further insight into factors affecting patient satisfaction may enhance patient experience and engagement, thereby improving clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Adolescent Patients' Treatment Motivation and Satisfaction with Orthodontic Treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 821-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Anderson ◽  
Airton Arruda ◽  
Marita Rohr Inglehart
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Possible Selves ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
European American ◽  
Treatment Motivation ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire ◽  
Satisfaction Questionnaire ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Abstract Objective: To determine whether adolescents' satisfaction with orthodontic treatment outcomes is correlated with the degree to which (1) the adolescents focused on and (2) were energized by imagining their posttreatment possible selves before the treatment, and whether parents' assessments of their children's pretreatment motivation would correlate with their children's posttreatment satisfaction. Methods: Data were collected from 75 former adolescent orthodontic patients (28 male, 47 female; 60 European American, 14 other) and from 72 parents (59 female, 12 male, 1 missing) with mailed questionnaires. Satisfaction with the treatment outcome was assessed with a revised version of Kiyak's Post-Surgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Results: The more the patients had focused on the posttreatment esthetics and functioning and the more they were energized by thinking about their posttreatment possible selves before the treatment, the more satisfied they were with the outcomes (r = .337, P = .004; r = .231, P = .053; r = .465, P &lt; .001). The more the parents believed that their children were energized by thinking about posttreatment possible selves, the more satisfied the parents were with the outcomes (r = .326, P = .007). Conclusions: Increasing adolescents' possible self considerations before orthodontic treatment is likely to increase their own and their parents' posttreatment satisfaction.

scholarly journals What Do Young Adults Think about the Safety of Over-the-Counter Analgesics? Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey

Pharmacy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Tahlia Duyster ◽  
Sara S. McMillan ◽  
Ella Whately ◽  
Fiona S. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
University Students ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Parental Influence ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Over The Counter ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Analgesic Use

Analgesics are commonly used over-the-counter (OTC) medicines readily available for purchase, sometimes without advice of a health professional. However, analgesics can cause harm even when taken according to dosing recommendations. Young adults may be more vulnerable to harm if they perceive low risk with OTC analgesic use, or struggle to interpret dosing instructions. This study aimed to explore factors affecting how young adults use OTC analgesics and associated perceptions of safety. An online survey was distributed to school-leavers and university students (17 to 25 years), in South-East Queensland, Australia, in the period November–December 2019. Most of the 302 respondents (school-leavers n = 147, university students n = 155) did not use analgesics frequently. School-leavers deferred to parents for analgesic information, while university students preferred the internet. The majority of respondents appeared safety conscious and did not take outside indicated use or instructions. However, a small proportion reported taking analgesics for an inappropriate indication. The difference in preferred source of analgesic information may reflect experience with analgesic use, increasing autonomy or decreased parental influence. Whilst it is encouraging that the majority of young adults appeared safety conscious, greater insight is needed into factors influencing decision making on OTC use, e.g., medicines knowledge, and changes with increasing age.

scholarly journals Fertility awareness and intentions among young adults in Greece

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Lardou ◽  
Ioannis Chatzipapas ◽  
Michail Chouzouris ◽  
Panos Xenos ◽  
Nikolaos Petrogiannis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Lower Education Level ◽  
Reproductive Techniques ◽  
Knowledge Deficits

Background: Greece has a mean age of first motherhood at 31.5 years, higher than the European average age of 29.4. Delaying conception, however, may be an important non-reversible cause of infertility. The aim of this study was to identify possible knowledge deficits regarding fertility in young adults. Methods: This was an online survey of young adults, regarding information on intention to parenthood and knowledge on issues affecting fertility. This study was conducted from February to December 2020, aiming for a representative sample of Greek men and women aged 18 and 26 years. The questionnaire was designed by a multidisciplinary group based on the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale, which contained 22 multiple-choice or Likert-scale questions. Results: We obtained responses from 1875 young adults, whose mean age was 22.1 years. About 91.8% of men and 94.0% of women declared an intention to have children, out of which 44.0% wanted to have two and 29.0% three children. About 52.0 and 50.8% men and women, respectively, aimed to start a family between 31 and 35 years. Residents of rural areas and those with a lower education level more likely aimed to have children before the age of 30. The most prevalent answers for age of ideal parenthood were between 26 and 30 years for a woman and 31–35 years for a man. Smoking, alcohol consumption and sexually transmitted infections were identified as factors affecting both female and male fertility. Half of men and women, respectively, overestimated general success rates of reproductive techniques. Conclusion: The knowledge of fertility, particularly with regards to assisted reproductive techniques’ success rates, may be overestimated as more young adults plan for having children after the age of 30.

scholarly journals Adult Patients’ Motivations and Expectations of Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yajing Qian ◽  
Siyang Yuan ◽  
Gerald Humphris ◽  
Ruth Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Quantitative Synthesis ◽  
Satisfaction With Treatment ◽  
Review Protocol

Abstract Background: This is a protocol for a systematic review of the motivations and expectations of adult patients who seek orthodontic treatment. With the continuous improvement of orthodontic technique and rapid innovation of orthodontic appliances, more adults begin to consider orthodontic treatment. Appropriate motivations and realistic expectations play an important role towards a desired goal that are thought to increase patients’ cooperation and achieve satisfaction with treatment outcome. This review aims to assess the motivations and expectations of adult patients who seek orthodontic treatment and investigate how their motivations and expectations affect their satisfaction with treatment outcomes.Methods: A systematic search will be undertaken to map and screen the literature on adult patients’ motivations and expectations of orthodontic treatment and their effects on satisfaction of treatment outcome. Papers written in English or Chinese with no study design restrictions will be included. The study of adolescent patients or patients’ parents, patients with craniofacial hypoplasia and orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery will be excluded. If quantitative synthesis is possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Discussion: This systematic review will identify and gather evidence on adult patients’ motivations and expectations of orthodontic treatment. The method orthodontists obtain and assess adult patients’ motivations and expectations will be discussed. Accurate obtaining and appropriate managing adult patients’ motivations and expectations may increase the cooperation during treatment and satisfaction of the treatment outcome.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020185022

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document