Outcomes of Inside-out Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Multiligament Reconstruction in the Knee

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 2098-2104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Chase S. Dean ◽  
Lauren M. Matheny ◽  
Justin J. Mitchell ◽  
Mark E. Cinque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Inside Out ◽  
Repair Group

Background: Limited evidence exists for meniscal repair outcomes in a multiligament reconstruction setting. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes and failure rates of meniscal repair in patients who underwent multiligament reconstruction compared with patients who underwent multiligament reconstruction but lacked meniscal tears. The authors hypothesized that the outcomes of meniscal repair associated with concomitant multiligament reconstruction would significantly improve from preoperatively to postoperatively at a minimum of 2 years after the index surgery. Secondarily, they hypothesized that this cohort would demonstrate similar outcomes and failure rates compared with the cohort that did not have meniscal lesions at the time of multiligament reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Inclusion criteria for the study included radiographically confirmed skeletally mature patients of at least 16 years of age who underwent multiligamentous reconstruction of the knee without previous ipsilateral osteotomy, intra-articular infections, or intra-articular fractures. Patients were included in the experimental group if they underwent inside-out meniscal suture repair with concurrent multiligament reconstruction. Those included in the control group (multiligament reconstruction without a meniscal tear) underwent multiligament reconstruction but did not undergo any type of meniscal surgery. Lysholm, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form–12 physical component summary and mental component summary, Tegner activity scale, and patient satisfaction scores were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The failure of meniscal repair was defined as a retear of the meniscus that was confirmed arthroscopically. Results: There were 43 patients (16 female, 27 male) in the meniscal repair group and 62 patients (25 female, 37 male) in the control group. Follow-up was obtained in 93% of patients with a mean of 3.0 years (range, 2.0-4.7 years). There was a significant improvement between all preoperative and postoperative outcome scores ( P < .05) for both groups. The meniscal repair group had significantly lower preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores ( P = .009 and P = .02, respectively). There were no significant differences between any other outcome scores preoperatively. The failure rate of the meniscal repair group was 2.7%, consisting of 1 symptomatic meniscal retear. There was no significant difference in any postoperative outcome score at a minimum 2-year follow-up between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Good to excellent patient-reported outcomes were reported for both groups with no significant differences in outcomes between the cohorts. Additionally, the failure rate for inside-out meniscal repair with concomitant multiligament reconstruction was low, regardless of meniscus laterality and tear characteristics. The use of multiple vertical mattress sutures and the biological augmentation resulting from intra-articular cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel reaming may be partially responsible for the stability of the meniscal repair construct and thereby contribute to the overall improved outcomes and the low failure rate of meniscal repair, despite lower preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores in the meniscal repair group.

Two-Tunnel Transtibial Repair of Radial Meniscus Tears Produces Comparable Results to Inside-Out Repair of Vertical Meniscus Tears

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 2253-2259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Cinque ◽  
Andrew G. Geeslin ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Grant J. Dornan ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Pullout Repair ◽  
Inside Out ◽  
Repair Group

Background: Radial meniscus tears disrupt the circumferential fibers and thereby compromise meniscus integrity. Historically, radial tears were often treated with meniscectomy because of an incomplete understanding of the biomechanical consequences of these tears, limited information regarding the biomechanical performance of repair, and the technical difficulty associated with repair. There is a paucity of studies on the outcomes of the repair of radial meniscus tears. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the outcomes of 2-tunnel transtibial repair of radial meniscus tears and compare these results to the outcomes of patients who underwent the repair of vertical meniscus tears with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The hypothesis was that radial and vertical meniscus tear repair outcomes were comparable. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent 2-tunnel transtibial pullout repair for a radial meniscus tear were included in this study and compared with patients who underwent inside-out repair for a vertical meniscus tear. Subjective questionnaires were administered preoperatively and at a minimum of 2-year follow-up, including the Lysholm score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Short Form–12 (SF-12) physical component summary (PCS), the Tegner activity scale, and patient satisfaction. Analysis of covariance was used to compare postoperative outcome scores between the meniscus repair groups while accounting for baseline scores. Adjusted mean effects relative to the radial repair group were reported with 95% CIs. Results: Twenty-seven patients who underwent 2-tunnel transtibial pullout repair for radial meniscus tears and 33 patients who underwent inside-out repair for vertical meniscus tears were available for follow-up at a mean of 3.5 years (range, 2.0-5.4 years). No preoperative outcome score significantly differed between the groups. There were no significant group differences for any of the 2-year postoperative outcome scores. Relative to the vertical repair group, the radial repair group exhibited an adjusted mean of −0.2 (95% CI, −5.4 to 4.9), −0.6 (95% CI, −6.6 to 5.5), and 5.1 (95% CI, −3.9 to 14.0) points on the SF-12 PCS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores, respectively. Conclusion: The 2-tunnel transtibial pullout technique for the repair of radial meniscus tears produces similar clinical outcomes when compared with the repair of vertical meniscus tears at a mean 3.5 years’ follow-up.

Comparison of Early Implant Failure Rates Between Subjects With and Without Orthodontic Treatment Before Dental Implantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Li-ching Chang ◽  
I-ming Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Implant Surgery ◽  
Dental Implantation ◽  
And Control

The present study compared early dental implant failure rates between patients with and without orthodontic treatment before dental implantation. The data of adults who had undergone dental implantation between January 2007 and December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 124 subjects with 255 implants were divided into a treatment group (46 subjects, 85 teeth) consisting of patients who had undergone implant surgery after orthodontic treatment and a control group of patients who had not undergone preimplant orthodontic treatment. Implants that failed before permanent crown fabrication were defined as failures. No significant differences in gender or age were found between the treatment group and controls. No significant differences were found in implant failure rates in either jaw between the treatment and control groups. However, the failure rate was still higher in the treatment group (14.81%) than in the control group (3.28%) for the maxilla. Results of this study demonstrate an increased implant failure rate only in the maxilla of patients who underwent orthodontic treatment before dental implantation, especially implant surgery combined with a sinus lift procedure. Further study with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period is necessary to confirm results of the present study and identify other confounding factors.

scholarly journals Mid-term evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic medial longitudinal and bucket-handle meniscus repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-370
Author(s):  
Raşit Özcafer ◽  
Ferdi Dırvar ◽  
Abdülhamit Mısır ◽  
Yaşar Maksut Dinçel ◽  
Mehmet Özbey Büyükkuşçu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bucket Handle Tear ◽  
Bucket Handle

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes following the arthroscopic medial meniscal repair. Patients and methods: A total of 50 patients (42 males, 8 females; mean age: 32.9±7.6 years; range, 17 to 48 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair for longitudinal and bucket-handle medial meniscal tears between March 2005 and October 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups as those having a longitudinal tear (patient group, n=31) and having a bucket-handle tear (control group, n=19). Preoperative and final follow-up functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results: The mean follow-up was 61.7±22.8 (range, 36 to 110) months. The mean preoperative LKS, IKDC score, TAS, and KOOS scores were significantly improved at the final postoperative follow-up (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores between longitudinal and bucket-handle repairs (p>0.05), and isolated repairs and concomitant meniscal repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (p>0.05). Conclusion: Arthroscopic meniscal repair provides similar mid-term functional and clinical outcomes for longitudinal and bucket-handle medial meniscal tears. Concomitant meniscal repair does not seem to affect meniscal healing.

scholarly journals A systematic review about long-term results after meniscus repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Petersen ◽  
Katrin Karpinski ◽  
Sebastian Bierke ◽  
Ralf Müller Rath ◽  
Martin Häner
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Clinical Scores ◽  
Meniscus Refixation

Abstract Purpose Aim of this systematic review was to analyze long-term results after meniscus refixation. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on long-term results after meniscus refixation with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Primary outcome criterion was the failure rate. Secondary outcome criteria were radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) and clinical scores. Results A total of 12 retrospective case series (level 4 evidence) were identified that reported about failure rates of more than 7 years follow-up. There was no statistical difference in the failure rates between open repair, arthroscopic inside-out with posterior incisions and arthroscopic all-inside repair with flexible non-resorbable implants. In long-term studies that examined meniscal repair in children and adolescents, failure rates were significantly higher than in studies that examined adults. Six studies have shown minor radiological degenerative changes that differ little from the opposite side. The reported clinical scores at follow-up were good to very good. Conclusion This systematic review demonstrates that good long-term outcomes can be obtained in patients after isolated meniscal repair and in combination with ACL reconstruction. With regard to the chondroprotective effect of meniscus repair, the long-term failure rate is acceptable. Level of evidence IV.

All-Inside Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 3386-3393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn A. Ardizzone ◽  
Darby A. Houck ◽  
Derek W. McCartney ◽  
Armando F. Vidal ◽  
Rachel M. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Bucket Handle

Background: There is no consensus on technique of choice for repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMTs). Purpose: To determine factors that affect patient outcomes and failure rates in patients undergoing all-inside repairs of BHMTs. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of 3 databases using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed. All English-language literature from 1993 to 2019 describing clinical outcomes for patients undergoing all-inside BHMT repair with ≥12-month follow-up was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Patient characteristics (patient sex, age), intraoperative factors (laterality, concomitant procedures, surgical technique, implants utilized), and postoperative outcomes (failure rates) were analyzed. Study quality was evaluated with the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Results: Fifteen studies (1 level 1, 4 level 3, 10 level 4) with 763 total patients (64% male; average age, 26.4 years [range, 9-58 years]; average follow-up, 39.8 months [range, 12-120 months]) including 396 all-inside BHMT repairs were included. Six devices were used for repair including the Meniscal Repair System, FasT-Fix, Meniscus Arrow, Biofix Arrow, RapidLoc device, and PDS II suture, with failure rates of 13.5%, 22.4%, 27.1%, 42.9%, 45.2%, and 0%, respectively. The overall repair failure rate was 29.3% at an average of 13.0 months (range, 5.0-32.4 months), but 19.0% for devices still in use. The RapidLoc and Biofix Arrow had higher failure rates than other devices ( P = .0003). Women (31%) were less likely to experience a failure than were men (69%) ( P = .03). Longer follow-up duration resulted in higher failure rates (>30 months, 34.4%; <30 months, 23.4%; P = .016). In 4 studies reporting on both all-inside and inside-out repairs, no significant differences in failure rates were observed. No significant differences in failure rates were found between medial and lateral repairs nor repair with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ( P > .05 for all). The overall average MCMS was 54.4 ± 12. Conclusion: The overall failure rate after all-inside repair of BHMTs is 29.3% at an average of 13.0 months, with no difference in failure rates between medial and lateral meniscal repairs. The variables shown to negatively affect the failure rates were the RapidLoc and Biofix Arrow, male sex, and longer follow-up duration.

scholarly journals DOES THE USE OF A “HYBRID” GRAFT ALTER GRAFT FAILURE RATES OR OUTCOMES IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0013
Author(s):  
D’Anne Arthur ◽  
Natalie Khalil ◽  
Edward Ebramzadeh ◽  
Jennifer Beck
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background The use of hamstring autografts less than 8.0mmin size to reconstruct anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is associated with a higher risk of graft failure. A hybrid graft consisting of hamstring autograft tendons supplemented by allograft tendon to create a more robust graft has been proposed as an alternative treatment option in patients with small hamstring graft size. Multiple studies have shown inconsistent results for ACL reconstructions with hybrid grafts. This meta-analysis was designed to examine the rates of graft failure and clinical outcome measures for hybrid grafts in primary ACL reconstructions. Methods A search was performed of PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar using the terms “Anterior Cruciate Ligament” OR “ACL” combined with “reconstruction” and “hybrid.” Two authors reviewed the papers, and outcomes were subdivided into autograft and hybrid graft. Chi Square with Yates Correction was used to determine the correlation between failure and type of graft for all patients, as well as for the subanalysis done for patients less than 18 years old and patients greater than 18 years old. Chi Square with Yates Correction and unpaired t-test were used to compare the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Unpaired t-test was used to evaluate for differences in subjective outcome scores. Results A total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one study included a comparison of hybrid grafts with autografts and allografts, and as such, the allograft data was excluded from the analysis. Overall a total of 506 patients were treated with autografts with an average age of 26.7 +/- 10.8 years; and a total of 453 patients were treated with hybrid grafts with an average age of 28.33 +/-10.4 years. All patients had minimum follow up of 2 years with average follow up of 38.2 months. There was no significant difference in sex between the two groups (p = 0.07). There were significantly more females in the hybrid group compared to the autograft group (48% versus 42%, respectively p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in failure rates for the autograft or hybrid graft subgroups (p = 0.92). International Knee Documentation (IKDC) scores and Lysholm scores were significantly higher in the autograft group than the hybrid graft group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference in Tegner Activity scores (p =0.68). On further subgroup analysis, there was no difference in failure rates for autografts vs hybrid grafts with subgroup analysis for both patients under 18 years of age and patients over 18 years of age (p = 0.78 and p = 0.24, respectively). Conclusions Supplementation of hamstring autograft with allograft tissue to form a “hybrid graft” did not alter the graft failure rate. But, the use of hybrid graft was associated with worse subjective outcome scores as measured by IKDC and Lysholm scores. Level of Evidence Level IV (A meta-analysis of Level II, III, and IV studies)

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Circumferential Labral Repair for Patients With Multidirectional Instability: A Comparative Outcome Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711989010
Author(s):  
Andrew Wall ◽  
Owen McGonigle ◽  
Thomas J. Gill
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Labral Repair ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repair Group

Background: Circumferential tears of the glenohumeral labrum are an uncommon injury, comprising 2.4% of all labral lesions. Currently, the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic circumferential labral repair for patients with instability and combined anterior, posterior, and superior labral tears are not well-known. Hypothesis: Patients treated with arthroscopic circumferential shoulder labral repairs will have inferior clinical outcomes and higher failure rates compared with patients who have isolated arthroscopic anterior labral repairs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients aged 18 years and older who underwent circumferential arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability as compared with an age-matched control group of arthroscopic primary anterior labral repairs. Age at surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) score (mental and physical), and overall patient satisfaction with surgery were assessed for each group. Results: A total of 35 consecutive patients (36 shoulders) who underwent an arthroscopic 360° circumferential labral repair were compared with a matched group of 31 patients who underwent an isolated arthroscopic anterior labral repair. The mean follow-up period was 34.3 and 56.8 months, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups for overall satisfaction with the surgery or recurrent instability. At the time of the follow-up survey, 22% of the patients experienced pain and 25% of the patients experienced instability in the circumferential repair group, whereas 15% of the patients experienced some level of pain and 30% of patients experienced a subjective sense of subtle instability in the isolated repair group. The ASES scores were 87.3 in the combined labral repair group and 93.3 in the isolated anterior group ( P = .35), SST scores were 10.7 and 11.3 ( P = .70), SF-12 mental scores were 54.6 and 56.8 ( P = .80), SF-12 physical scores were 53.2 and 54.2 ( P = .98), and age at time of the surgery was 26.7 and 24.6 years ( P = .33), respectively. There was no difference between the 2 groups in pre- and postoperative range of motion ( P > .05). Conclusion: There was no difference in shoulder stability and function in patients after 360° combined labral repairs versus anterior labral repair alone. With proper patient selection, patients can expect similar outcomes despite the more extensive surgical procedure and complex postoperative rehabilitation protocol for circumferential repairs.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Text Messaging as an Incentive to Maintain Physical Activity after Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6645
Author(s):  
Giulia Foccardi ◽  
Marco Vecchiato ◽  
Daniel Neunhaeuserer ◽  
Michele Mezzaro ◽  
Giulia Quinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
Text Messages ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Stand Test ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Significant Difference

Although the efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is proven, the need to improve patients’ adherence has emerged. There are only a few studies that have investigated the effect of sending text messages after a CR period to stimulate subjects’ ongoing engagement in regular physical activity (PA). A randomized controlled pilot trial was conducted after CR, sending a daily PA text message reminder to an intervention group (IG), which was compared with a usual care control group (CG) during three months of follow-up. Thirty-two subjects were assessed pre- and post-study intervention with GPAQ, submaximal iso-watt exercise testing, a 30 s sit-to-stand test, a bilateral arm curl test, and a final survey on a seven-point Likert scale. A statistically significant difference in the increase of moderate PA time (Δ 244.7 (95% CI 189.1, 300.4) minutes, p < 0.001) and in the reduction of sedentary behavior time (Δ −77.5 (95% CI 104.9, −50.1) minutes, p = 0.004) was shown when the IG was compared with the CG. This was associated with an improvement in heart rate, blood pressure, and patients’ Borg rating on the category ratio scale 10 (CR10) in iso-watt exercise testing (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, only the IG did not show a worsening of the strength parameters in the follow-up leading to a change of the 30 s sit-to-stand test with a difference of +2.2 (95% CI 1.23, 3.17) repetitions compared to CG (p = 0.03). The telemedical intervention has been appreciated by the IG, whose willingness to continue with regular PA emerged to be superior compared to the CG. Text messages are an effective and inexpensive adjuvant after phase 2 CR that improves adherence to regular PA. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in a larger patient population and in the long term.

scholarly journals Impact of failed ab-interno trabeculectomy (trabectome) on subsequent XEN45 gel stent implantation in pseudophakic eyes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kiessling ◽  
C. Rennings ◽  
M. Hild ◽  
A. Lappas ◽  
T. S. Dietlein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Implantation ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Repeat Surgery ◽  
Medication Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ab Interno Trabeculectomy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ab Interno

Abstract Purpose To determine the impact of failed ab-interno trabeculectomy on the postoperative outcome of subsequent XEN45 gel stent (Allergan, CA, USA) implantation in pseudophakic eyes. Methods In this retrospective single-center study, we included 60 pseudophakic eyes from 60 participants who underwent XEN45 gel stent implantation. Thirty eyes each underwent primary stent implantation (control group) or had previously undergone a failed ab-interno trabeculectomy (trabectome group). The groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio based on the following criteria: preoperative and maximum Intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative medication score, cup/disk-ratio, follow-up time, best-corrected visual acuity at baseline, age, and the proportion of patients classified as primary open angle glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma. We defined a successful surgery by the following three scores: an IOP reduction > 20% and IOP at the longest follow-up < 21 mmHg (Score A) or < 18 mmHg (Score B) or IOP ≤ 15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥ 40% (Score C). One open conjunctival revision was allowed in all scores, and a repeat surgery was considered a failure. Results Following an average follow-up period of 22 ± 12 months, we observed a mean IOP reduction of 38%, from 23.5 ± 5.2–14.5 ± 5.0 mmHg. Comparative analyses between the groups did not reveal a significant difference in the postoperative IOP, postoperative medication score, side effects, revision rate, repeat surgery rate, or success rate. Conclusions Trabectome is a viable first-line procedure for medically uncontrolled glaucoma before filtering ab-interno microstent surgery is considered.

Capsular closure versus unrepaired interportal capsulotomy after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, results of a patient-blinded randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110057
Author(s):  
Niels H Bech ◽  
Inger N Sierevelt ◽  
Sheryl de Waard ◽  
Boudijn S H Joling ◽  
Gino M M J Kerkhoffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Hip capsular management after hip arthroscopy remains a topic of debate. Most available current literature is of poor quality and are retrospective or cohort studies. As of today, no clear consensus exists on capsular management after hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of routine capsular closure versus unrepaired capsulotomy after interportal capsulotomy measured with NRS pain and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). Materials and methods: All eligible patients with femoroacetabular impingement who opt for hip arthroscopy ( n = 116) were randomly assigned to one of both treatment groups and were operated by a single surgeon. Postoperative pain was measured with the NRS score weekly the first 12 weeks after surgery. The HAGOS questionnaire was measured at 12 and 52 weeks postoperatively. Results: Baseline characteristics and operation details were comparable between treatment groups. Regarding the NRS pain no significant difference was found between groups at any point the first 12 weeks after surgery ( p = 0.67). Both groups significantly improved after surgery ( p < 0.001). After 3 months follow-up there were no differences between groups for the HAGOS questionnaire except for the domain sport ( p = 0.02) in favour of the control group. After 12 months follow-up there were no differences between both treatment groups on all HAGOS domains ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this randomised controlled trial show highest possible evidence that there is no reason for routinely capsular closure after interportal capsulotomy at the end of hip arthroscopy. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at the CCMO Dutch Trial Register: NL55669.048.15.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document