Training in Nonviolent Resistance for Foster Parents

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 931-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Van Holen ◽  
Johan Vanderfaeillie ◽  
Haim Omer ◽  
Femke Vanschoonlandt
Keyword(s):  
Parenting Stress ◽  
Behavioral Problems ◽  
Parenting Practices ◽  
Foster Parents ◽  
Longitudinal Research ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Externalizing Problem

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate a training in non-violent resistance (NVR) for foster parents who take care of a foster child (ages 6-18) with externalizing problem behavior. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was used to compare an intervention group (NVR, n = 31) with a treatment as usual control group (TAU, n = 31). The NVR-intervention consists of ten weekly home sessions. Measures regarding behavioral problems in foster children, parenting stress and parenting practices in foster mothers, and the size of the supportive network were assessed before, after treatment, and at three months follow-up. Results: NVR showed to be an acceptable approach that lead to an increase in experienced support and some promising changes in parenting stress and parenting practices. Conclusion: Implementation of this intervention might increase the effectiveness of foster care. More longitudinal research using a Multitrait-multimethod-approach is however needed.

Abstract TP168: Efficacy of a Pictogram to Promote Stroke Knowledge Among Illiterate Korean Elderly

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cha-Nam Shin ◽  
Jeongha Sim ◽  
Dongchoon Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Longitudinal Research ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Warning Signs ◽  
Repeated Measure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Stroke Knowledge

Background and Purpose: Extensive research supports the importance of knowledge in stroke prevention and reducing prehospital delay time. However, the level of stroke knowledge among Korean older adults remains low. In particular, older adults who are illiterate lack of stroke information despite being at high risk. The purpose of this study was to develop and examine the efficacy of a pictogram to enhance stroke knowledge in the high-risk and illiterate older adults. Methods: We conducted a pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design study and compared differences in stroke knowledge before and after the intervention. A total of 117 older adults (82 in the intervention group and 35 in the control group) who were 60 years and older residing in community participated in the study. Participants in the intervention group received a pictogram-based education, while participants in the control group received a powerpoint-based education. Stroke knowledge was measured by structured survey questionnaires. Descriptive statistics for sample characteristics, repeated measure ANOVA for the efficacy, and independent t-test for satisfaction comparison between groups were used. Results: The intervention group showed a higher increase in stroke knowledge (F=16.45), awareness of risk factors (F=15.71), stroke warning signs and symptoms (F=17.29), and action at stroke (F=19.36) compared to the control group at p <.001. Also, the intervention group reported that they would recommend the education program to others (t=2.64, p<.05) and the program was applicable to real situation (t=4.47, p <.001), which were scored higher than the control group. Conclusions: The data revealed that a pictogram-based education is more effective than a powerpoint-based education among illiterate older adults. Replicated studies with this pictogram in a larger randomized controlled trial is warranted, which may give greater validity to our findings. Future longitudinal research is recommended to examine retention of stroke knowledge over the long term.

scholarly journals Postcards from the EDge: 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial for hospital-treated self-poisoning

2013 ◽  
Vol 202 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Carter ◽  
Kerrie Clover ◽  
Ian M. Whyte ◽  
Andrew H. Dawson ◽  
Catherine D'Este
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Psychiatric Hospital ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Psychiatric Admissions ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Event Rates

BackgroundRepetition of hospital-treated self-poisoning and admission to psychiatric hospital are both common in individuals who self-poison.AimsTo evaluate efficacy of postcard intervention after 5 years.MethodA randomised controlled trial of individuals who have self-poisoned: postcard intervention (eight in 12 months) plus treatment as usualv.treatment as usual. Our primary outcomes were self-poisoning admissions and psychiatric admissions (proportions and event rates).ResultsThere was no difference between groups for any repeat-episode self-poisoning admission (intervention group: 24.9%, 95% CI 20.6-29.5; control group: 27.2%, 95% CI 22.8-31.8) but there was a significant reduction in event rates (incidence risk ratio (IRR)=0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.81), saving 306 bed days. There was no difference for any psychiatric admission (intervention group: 38.1%, 95% CI 33.1-43.2; control group: 35.5%, 95% CI 30.8-40.5) but there was a significant reduction in event rates (IRR=0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.91), saving 2565 bed days.ConclusionsA postcard intervention halved self-poisoning events and reduced psychiatric admissions by a third after 5 years. Substantial savings occurred in general hospital and psychiatric hospital bed days.

150 Falls in Malaysia: Magnitude, Risk, Disparities, and Solutions

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv34-iv39
Author(s):  
Maw Pin Tan ◽  
Sumaiyah Mat ◽  
Deepa Alex ◽  
Shahrul Bahyah Kamaruzzaman
Keyword(s):  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Longitudinal Research ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Psychological Status ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
One Year ◽  
Risk Factors For Falls

Abstract The Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research (MELoR) study found 1 in 4 residents aged 65 years and over living in the Klang Valley of Malaysia fall at least once a year in their survey conducted between 2013 and 2015. Recent figures obtained from the First Older Persons’ National Health and Morbidity Survey conducted in 2018 revealed that 15% of Malaysians aged 60 years and over fall at least once a year. In a 10-year follow-up study involving 200 individuals who presented to the emergency department over a six-month period in 2002, 22% were no longer alive at one year, and 80% had died at 10 years. Older age, indoor falls, subsequent hospital admission and functional impairment predicted death at one year. Cross-sectional data from MELoR revealed ethnic differences in fall prevalence, with the ethnic Indians more likely to report falls in the past 12 months compared to the ethnic Malays. Independent risk factors for falls identified from MELoR were urinary incontinence, reduced grip strength, hearing impairment, comorbidities and reducing walking speed. The ethnic differences in falls in our population remain unexplained. Lifestyle and cultural practices may well be the underlying rationale, but genetic influences cannot currently be ruled out. The results of a randomized controlled trial on multifactorial interventions, the Malaysian Falls Assessment and Intervention Trial (MyFAIT), was published last year. Mo differences in falls outcomes with an individualized multifactorial intervention were observed, despite improvements in physical performance and psychological status in the intervention group compared to the control group. The research group has now secured two-year funding to evaluate post-fall behavior in our setting in the Life After Falls (LiAF) study. In addition, dissemination and upskilling efforts are underway through training workshops, formation of the Malaysian Falls Network (MyFalls) and collaborations with the private sector to increase awareness on falls and increase fall prevention efforts throughout the country.

scholarly journals Does a brief work-stress intervention prevent sick-leave during the following 24 months? A randomized controlled trial in Swedish primary care

Work ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jenny Hultqvist ◽  
Pernilla Bjerkeli ◽  
Gunnel Hensing ◽  
Kristina Holmgren
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Sick Leave ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Primary Health

BACKGROUND: Work-related stress (WRS) presents a risk for sick leave. However, effective methods to identify people at risk for sick leave due to WRS at an early stage are lacking in primary health care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a systematic early identification of WRS can prevent sick leave over 24 months after the intervention. METHODS: Study participants (n = 132 intervention; n = 139 control) were employed, non-sick-listed persons seeking care at primary health care centres. The intervention included early identification of WRS by a validated instrument, general practitioner (GP) awareness supported by a brief training session, patients’ self-reflection by instrument completion, GP giving the patient feedback at consultation and GP identifying preventive measures. The control group received treatment as usual. Outcome data were retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency. RESULTS: The intervention group had less registered median sick leave days (n = 56) than the control group (n = 65) but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The brief intervention was not proven effective in preventing sick leave in the following 24 months compared to treatment as usual. Further research on how to identify, advice and treat those at high risk for sick leave in primary health care is needed.

scholarly journals Family Minds: A randomized controlled trial of a group intervention to improve foster parents’ reflective functioning

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Tina Adkins ◽  
Samantha Reisz ◽  
Dilara Hasdemir ◽  
Peter Fonagy
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Parenting Stress ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Internalizing Symptoms ◽  
Foster Parents ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Reflective Functioning ◽  
Internalizing Behavior ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled

AbstractFamily Minds is a brief group psychoeducational parenting intervention designed to increase the reflective functioning (RF) and mentalization skills of foster parents. RF is important for foster parents who have to build relationships with children whose adverse experiences increase their risk for psychosocial challenges. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) for Family Minds was conducted in Texas with 89 foster parents. The main aims of this study were to examine whether the intervention could significantly increase the RF/mentalization skills of the foster parents and decrease their parenting stress. After 6 weeks, compared with the control group, intervention foster parents improved their RF via a lowering of pre-mentalizing and also significantly decreased parenting stress related to parent–child dysfunctional interactions. Other measures of RF and parenting stress showed no significant differences between groups. Foster child behavior was not significantly different between groups, although data at 6 months showed a possible lowering of internalizing symptoms for children of intervention parents. This RCT provides some encouraging evidence that Family Minds may increase RF in foster parents, improve parental sensitivity and their ability to emotionally regulate, decrease parenting stress related to challenging interactions with their foster children, and possibly decrease children's internalizing behavior.

scholarly journals The Impact of an Early Eclectic Rehabilitative Intervention on Symptoms in First Episode Depression among Employed People

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Tero Raiskila ◽  
Sanna Blanco Sequeiros ◽  
Jorma Kiuttu ◽  
Marja-Liisa Kauhanen ◽  
Kristian Läksy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Intervention Treatment ◽  
Working Age ◽  
Rehabilitative Intervention ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To evaluate the effect of an early vocational-orientated eclectic intervention on beck depression inventory (BDI) scores compared to treatment as usual in first ever depressive episode among employed people.Design. A randomized controlled trial comparing the rehabilitative intervention and the conventional treatment.Subjects. The subjects came from occupational health care units.Methods. Employees were sent to a rehabilitation center after being screened for depression using the BDI. They were diagnosed using the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. The participating subjects (N=283) were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received eclectic early depression intervention treatment (N=134) and the control group was treated in the conventional way (N=100). They were followed for one year.Results. The mean decrease in BDI scores within the intervention group was from 20.8 to 11.6 and within the control group from 19.3 to 10.8. BDI score decreased by 10 or more points in 64% of the participants in the intervention group and in 53% of the control group (P=0.013).Conclusions. There was some evidence that early eclectic intervention in first ever episode depression may be more effective than conventional treatments among working age people in employment.

Tablet-Based Outpatient Care for People With Dementia

GeroPsych ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Lech ◽  
Julie L. O’Sullivan ◽  
Paul Gellert ◽  
Jan‐Niklas Voigt-Antons ◽  
Robert Greinacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract. Most people with dementia (PwD) are treated on an outpatient basis, predominantly by general practitioners (GPs). This article provides a detailed protocol of a study aimed at developing and evaluating a tablet-based intervention to improve outpatient dementia care by fostering guideline-based treatment. A cluster-randomized controlled trial with an intervention group (tablet-based intervention) and a control group (treatment as usual plus information handbook) will be conducted. Clusters will be randomized at GP level. Primary outcome is defined as adherence to dementia guideline recommendations after 9 months. Secondary outcomes include various health outcomes assessed in PwD (e.g., quality of life) and informal caregivers (e.g., caregiver burden). Outcomes will be analyzed by an intention-to-treat analysis and using mixed models.

scholarly journals Impact of a Brief Family Skills Training Programme (“Strong Families”) on Parenting Skills, Child Psychosocial Functioning, and Resilience in Iran: A Multisite Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 11137
Author(s):  
Karin Haar ◽  
Aala El-Khani ◽  
Gelareh Mostashari ◽  
Mahdokht Hafezi ◽  
Atoosa Malek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Relationships ◽  
Psychosocial Functioning ◽  
Parenting Practices ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Waitlist Control ◽  
Waitlist Control Group

Caregivers have a key role in protecting children’s wellbeing, and, with appropriate skills, can prevent a multitude of negative social outcomes, particularly in challenged or humanitarian settings. Accordingly, the Strong Families programme was designed as a light touch family skills programme, with a focus of supporting caregiving during stressful situations. To evaluate the short-term impact of the Strong Families programme, we performed a time-convenience, randomized, controlled trial in Iran. A total of 292 families (63% from Iranian decent, 39% from Afghan decent, and 1% other), with children aged eight to twelve years, were recruited through ten centers in Iran and allocated to an intervention (n = 199) or waitlist/control group (n = 93). The two groups did not differ demographically at baseline. We assessed families prospectively, through three scales, PAFAS (parenting and family adjustment scales), SDQ (strengths and difficulties questionnaire), and CYRM-R (child and youth resilience measure). Caregivers in the intervention group improved (highly) statistically significantly on all but one PAFAS subscales (parental consistency, coercive parenting, positive encouragement, parental adjustment, family relationships, and parental teamwork), which was not noted in the waitlist group. On the SDQ, there were (highly) significant positive changes in scores in the intervention group on all sub-scales and the “total difficulty scale“, whereas the waitlist/control group also improved on three (prosocial, conduct problems, and hyperactivity) of the five SDQ subscales. Children originating from Afghanistan improved significantly on the overall resilience scale of the CYRM-R in the intervention group, but not in the waitlist/control group. Overall, all our stratified results of the different scales reflect an accentuated improvement in families with higher levels of problems at baseline. Our comparative results indicated a strong alignment of the strong families programme with its intended short-term impact, per its logical frame on parenting practices and family management skills, children behaviour, caregivers and children mental health, and capacity to cope with stress. We postulate that the potential nudging or diffusion of knowledge (cross-contamination between intervention and waitlist/control group) at the community level could explain improvements in the waitlist/control group on some indicators, however, further research on this is recommend.

scholarly journals Family psychoeducation for major depression: randomised controlled trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 198 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kae Shimazu ◽  
Shinji Shimodera ◽  
Yoshio Mino ◽  
Atsushi Nishida ◽  
Naoto Kamimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Depression ◽  
Expressed Emotion ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bipolar Affective Disorder ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Family Psychoeducation ◽  
Treatment As Usual

BackgroundThe value of family psychoeducation for schizophrenia has been well established, and indications for its use have recently expanded to include bipolar affective disorder. However, no study to date has adequately examined its use in depression.AimsTo examine family psychoeducation in the maintenance treatment of depression and to investigate the influence of the family's expressed emotion (EE) on its effectiveness.MethodOf 103 patients diagnosed with major depression and their primary family members, 57 pairs provided written informed consent. The pairs were randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 25) or control (n = 32). One family in the intervention group and two in the control group withdrew their consent after randomisation. The intervention group underwent four psychoeducation sessions consisting of didactic lectures about depression and group problem-solving focusing on how to cope in high-EE situations. Patients did not attend these sessions. Patients in both the intervention and control groups received treatment as usual. The families' EE levels were evaluated through Five-Minute Speech Samples. The primary outcome was relapse.ResultsTime to relapse was statistically significantly longer in the psychoeducation group than in the control group (Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, P = 0.002). The relapse rates up to the 9-month follow-up were 8% and 50% respectively (risk ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.66; number needed to treat 2.4, 95% CI 1.6–4.9). In Cox proportional hazard analysis, baseline EE did not moderate the effectiveness of the intervention.ConclusionsFamily psychoeducation is effective in the prevention of relapse in adult patients with major depression.

scholarly journals Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a self-help acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for grief and psychological distress in carers of palliative care patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther L Davis ◽  
Frank P Deane ◽  
Geoffrey CB Lyons ◽  
Gregory D Barclay ◽  
Joan Bourne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Acceptance And Commitment Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Commitment Therapy ◽  
Acceptance And Commitment

We tested the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an acceptance and commitment therapy self-help intervention for grief and psychological distress in carers of patients in palliative care. Carers were randomised to the control group, which received treatment as usual, or the intervention group, which received treatment as usual plus an acceptance and commitment therapy–based self-help booklet and telephone support call. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 1-month post-allocation and 6 months post-loss. Results indicated that the intervention was generally feasible and viewed as acceptable to carers. Preliminary effectiveness analyses showed at least a small effect in acceptance, valued-living, grief and psychological distress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document