That's Interesting! A Flawed Article Has Influenced Generations of Management Researchers

2021 ◽  
pp. 105649262110487
Author(s):  
Eric W.K. Tsang

Davis's (1971) article “That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology” is regarded by many management researchers as a classic work and a basis for guiding management studies; in the wake of its publication, an interesting research advocacy gradually emerged. However, from the perspective of scientific research, Davis's core argument that great theories have to be interesting is seriously flawed. Interestingness is not regarded as a virtue of a good scientific theory and thus has little value in science. Moreover, obsession with interestingness can lead to at least five detrimental outcomes, namely promoting an improper way of doing science, encouraging post hoc hypothesis development, discouraging replication studies, ignoring the proper duties of a researcher, and undermining doctoral education.

Dialogue ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold I. Davidson ◽  
Norbert Hornstein

Recent interpretations of Locke's primary/secondary quality distinction have tended to emphasize Locke's relationship to the corpuscularian science of his time, especially to that of Boyle. Although this trend may have corrected the unfortunate tendency to view Locke in isolation from his scientific contemporaries, it nevertheless has resulted in some over- simplifications and distortions of Locke's general enterprise. As everyone now agrees, Locke was attempting to provide a philosophical foundation for English corpuscularianism and one must therefore look not only at the current scientific hypotheses but also at the nature of the philosophical foundation Locke was attempting to erect. In particular, Locke made an attempt, based on epistemological principles, to give a philosophical justification of atomistic corpuscularianism. Moreover, he was not content to give this justification post hoc—the epistemological foundation was prior to, and determined the framework for, the details of the correct scientific theory. Locke's epistemology made legitimate an atomistic theory, one making crucial use of the notion of solidity in the definition of the elementary particles, although it did not prejudge the details of this theory.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 12-19
Author(s):  
O. D. Ostroumova ◽  
V. N. Butorov ◽  
N. A. Arablinsky ◽  
R. R. Romanovsky ◽  
S. V. Batyukina

Clinical practice and ongoing scientific research in recent years show the importance of the problem of multimorbidity in atrial fibrillation (AF). The prevalence of AF in the general population is 1–2%, while the frequency of its occurrence increases with age – from less than 0.5% at the age of 40–50 to 5–15% at the age of 80. Only 19.6% of patients with AF have no comorbidities, 69.3% of patients have 1 to 3 comorbidities, and 11.1% of patients with AF had 4 and more comorbidities. In patients with AF and with 4 and more comorbidities, the risk of death from all causes is almost seven times higher than in patients without comorbidities. As shown by the post hoc analysis of the ARISTOTLE study, apixaban was equally effective and safe in both patients without concomitant pathology and in muliborbid patients. The efficacy and safety of apixaban has been shown in AF and concomitant arterial hypertension, heart failure, coronary heart disease, including in patients with acute coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The data of scientific research in recent years are reflected in the recommendations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation on AF (2020), which presents a separate section on the management of patients with concomitant diseases. It is emphasized that apixaban has shown its superiority over warfarin and other direct oral anticoagulants in terms of efficacy and safety, both in isolated AF and in patients with concomitant diseases, which makes its choice preferable in the treatment of multimirbidity AF patients.


Author(s):  
Jessica Kay Flake ◽  
Eiko I Fried

In this paper, we define questionable measurement practices (QMPs) as decisions researchers make that raise doubts about the validity of the measures, and ultimately the validity of study conclusions. Doubts arise for a host of reasons including a lack of transparency, ignorance, negligence, or misrepresentation of the evidence. We describe the scope of the problem and focus on how transparency is a part of the solution. A lack of measurement transparency makes it impossible to evaluate potential threats to internal, external, statistical conclusion, and construct validity. We demonstrate that psychology is plagued by a measurement schmeasurement attitude: QMPs are common, hide a stunning source of researcher degrees of freedom, pose a serious threat to cumulative psychological science, but are largely ignored. We address these challenges by providing a set of questions that researchers and consumers of scientific research can consider to identify and avoid QMPs. Transparent answers to these measurement questions promote rigorous research, allow for thorough evaluations of a study’s inferences, and are necessary for meaningful replication studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 456-465
Author(s):  
Jessica Kay Flake ◽  
Eiko I. Fried

In this article, we define questionable measurement practices (QMPs) as decisions researchers make that raise doubts about the validity of the measures, and ultimately the validity of study conclusions. Doubts arise for a host of reasons, including a lack of transparency, ignorance, negligence, or misrepresentation of the evidence. We describe the scope of the problem and focus on how transparency is a part of the solution. A lack of measurement transparency makes it impossible to evaluate potential threats to internal, external, statistical-conclusion, and construct validity. We demonstrate that psychology is plagued by a measurement schmeasurement attitude: QMPs are common, hide a stunning source of researcher degrees of freedom, and pose a serious threat to cumulative psychological science, but are largely ignored. We address these challenges by providing a set of questions that researchers and consumers of scientific research can consider to identify and avoid QMPs. Transparent answers to these measurement questions promote rigorous research, allow for thorough evaluations of a study’s inferences, and are necessary for meaningful replication studies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Emanuele Ratti

This chapter offers an overview of how virtue-based concepts have been used by philosophers of science to shed light on epistemic aspects of science. In the epistemology of science, the word virtue has referred to two different concepts. First, virtue can be understood as excellence, where excellence is a quality of a model, a theory, or a hypothesis. Second, virtue can be understood more narrowly as a stable character trait and/or disposition of scientists themselves. The first meaning is connected to the long-standing debate on the qualities that make a scientific theory a good scientific theory. The second meaning is connected to a much more recent conversation exploring the connections between virtue epistemology and philosophy of science. I explore how these two meanings of virtue have been developed, and I highlight underexplored areas that can advance our understanding of the relation between virtue theory and philosophy of science.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Pier Normand ◽  
Patrick St-Hilaire ◽  
Célyne H. Bastien

Cortical hyperarousal is higher in insomnia sufferers (INS) than in good sleepers (GS) and could be related to an alteration in sleep protection mechanisms, like reduced density or altered characteristics in sleep spindles. The deficient sleep protection mechanisms might in turn enhance underestimation of sleep. This study’s objective was to document sleep spindles characteristics in INS compared with GS and to investigate their potential role in sleep consolidation and misperception. Seventeen individuals with paradoxical insomnia (PARA-I), 24 individuals with psychophysiological insomnia (PSY-I), and 29 GS completed four consecutive polysomnographic nights in laboratory. Sleep spindles were detected automatically during stage 2 and SWS (3-4) on night 3. Number, density, duration, frequency, and amplitude of sleep spindles were calculated. A misperception index was used to determine the degree of discrepancy between subjective and objective total sleep times. Kruskal-WallisHtests and post hoc tests revealed that PARA-I had significantly shorter sleep spindles than GS but that PSY-I and GS did not differ on spindles length. A standard multiple regression model revealed that neither sleep spindles characteristics nor objective sleep measures were predictive of sleep misperception. A longer duration of spindles could reflect a higher gating process but this hypothesis still needs to be confirmed in replication studies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Pfeiffer Flores ◽  
Anny Caroline Nolasco ◽  
Bianca da Nobrega Rogoski

Conceptual analysis is a methodological branch of scientific research. Most psychological concepts originated in ordinary language. Although a concept often changes when it becomes part of a scientific theory, analysis of its original logical functioning is a precondition for understanding and evaluating conceptual changes. In this study, we analyse the logical functioning of the concept of comprehension, using techniques of Ordinary Language Philosophy. We present as central logical characteristics of the concept: (1) comprehension is an achievement concept; (2) there can be different degrees of comprehension; (3) comprehension is a polymorphous concept and (4) it is a dispositional concept. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of this analysis for narrative comprehension and illustrate them with a proposal for assessment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Kay Flake ◽  
Mairead Shaw ◽  
Raymond Luong

Yarkoni describes a grim state of psychological science in which the gross misspecification of our models and specificity of our operationalizations produce claims with generality so narrow that no one would be interested in them. We consider this a generalizability of construct validity issue and discuss how construct validation research should precede large-scale replication research. We provide ideas for a path forward by suggesting psychologists take a few steps back. By retooling large-scale replication studies, psychologists can execute the descriptive research needed to assess the generalizability of constructs. We provide examples of reusing large-scale replication data to conduct construct validation research post hoc. We also discuss proof of concept research that is on-going at the Psychological Science Accelerator. Big team psychology makes large-scale construct validity and generalizability research feasible and worthwhile. We assert that no one needs to quit the field, in fact, there is plenty of work to do. The optimistic interpretation is that if psychologists focus less on generating new ideas and more on organizing, synthesizing, measuring, and assessing constructs from existing ideas, we can keep busy for at least 100 years.


Author(s):  
Jan Sprenger ◽  
Stephan Hartmann

Is simplicity a virtue of a good scientific theory, and are simpler theories more likely to be true or predictively successful? If so, how much should simplicity count vis-à-vis predictive accuracy? We address this question using Bayesian inference, focusing on the context of statistical model selection and an interpretation of simplicity via the degree of freedoms of a model. We rebut claims to prove the epistemic value of simplicity by means of showing its particular role in Bayesian model selection strategies (e.g., the BIC or the MML). Instead, we show that Bayesian inference in the context of model selection is usually done in a philosophically eclectic, instrumental fashion that is more tuned to practical applications than to philosophical foundations. Thus, these techniques cannot justify a particular “appropriate weight of simplicity in model selection”.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S38-S38
Author(s):  
Jakub Simon ◽  
Stephen Kennedy ◽  
Barbara Mahon ◽  
Sheri Dubey ◽  
Rebecca Grant-Klein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The recent Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo highlights the sustained threat of EVD morbidity and mortality where healthcare and vaccine delivery are challenging. ERVEBO®, a live recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) vaccine containing the Zaire ebolavirus glycoprotein (GP) in place of the VSV GP (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP), was developed by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA in collaboration with multiple partners to prevent EVD and has been approved for human use in several countries. Methods We pooled data from three Phase 2/3 clinical trials conducted in Guinea (FLW), Sierra Leone (STRIVE), and Liberia (PREVAIL) during the 2013–2016 West African outbreak to assess immune responses using a validated assay in each of the three studies and performed a post hoc analysis by sex, age (18–50 yrs & >50 yrs) and baseline (BL) GP-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) titer (< 200 & ≥200 EU/ml). The full analysis set (FAS) population included the primary immunogenicity populations (all vaccinated participants with serology data collected within an acceptable day range) from all three trials. The endpoints were total IgG antibody response (EU/mL) measured by the GP-ELISA and neutralizing antibody response measured by the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP at Days 14, 28, 180, and 365 postvaccination. Results In the overall population and in all subgroups, GP-ELISA and PRNT geometric mean titers increased from BL, with most peaking at Day 28 and persisting through Day 365. There were differences between males and females and between participants with BL GP-ELISA < 200 & ≥200 EU/ml. There did not appear to be a difference between age groups. Conclusion These data demonstrate that rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP elicits a robust and durable immune response up to 12 months in participants regardless of age, sex, or BL GP-ELISA titer. The higher immune responses observed in females and participants with preexisting immunity are consistent with those described in published literature for other vaccines. Disclosures Jakub Simon, MD, MS, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Stephen Kennedy, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Barbara Mahon, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Sheri Dubey, MS, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Rebecca Grant-Klein, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Ken Liu, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Jonathan Hartzel, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Beth-Ann Coller, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Carolee Welebob, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Mary Hanson, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Rebecca Grais, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Scientific Research Study Investigator)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document