Incorporating Continuity in a 7-On 7-Off Hospitalist Model and the Correlation With Patient Handoffs and Length of Stay

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 553-560
Author(s):  
Christopher M. O’Donnell ◽  
Marsha Stern ◽  
Traci Leong ◽  
Ethan Molitch-Hou ◽  
Bruce Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Hospital Medicine ◽  
Staffing Model ◽  
Patient Handoffs

Little research in hospital medicine examines the effects of hospitalist continuity on patient outcomes. This study implemented a novel staffing model with approximately half of rounding teams starting their 7-day workweek on Monday and the others on Friday. Teams admitted their own patients on their first 4 days with additional nighttime admissions handed off to those teams. No admissions were given to teams on their last 3 days. Length of stay was significantly reduced from 6.34 days in 2015 to 5.7 days in 2016 ( P < .002) with a significant decrease in handoffs. There was an increase in odds ratio of death (1.37, SE = .128) with each additional hospitalist involved in a patient’s care while adjusting for year and number of patient diagnoses ( P < .001). There was no statistical difference in charges, 30-day readmissions, or mortality between years.

scholarly journals COVID Oximetry @home: evaluation of patient outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Boniface ◽  
Dan Burns ◽  
Christopher Duckworth ◽  
Franklin Duruiheoma ◽  
Htwe Armitage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Deterioration ◽  
The North ◽  
Hospital Stays

Background: COVID-19 has placed unprecedented demands on hospitals. A clinical service, COVID Oximetry @home (CO@h) was launched in November 2020 to support remote monitoring of COVID-19 patients in the community. Remote monitoring through CO@h aims to identify early patient deterioration and provide timely escalation for cases of silent hypoxia, while reducing the burden on secondary care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective service evaluation of COVID-19 patients onboarded to CO@h from November 2020 to March 2021 in the North Hampshire (UK) community led service (a collaboration of 15 GP practices, covering a population of 230,000 people). We have compared outcomes for patients admitted to Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital who were CO@h patients (COVID-19 patients with monitoring of SpO2 (n=137)), with non CO@h patients (those directly admitted without being monitored by CO@h (n=633)). Odds Ratio analysis was performed to contrast the likelihood of patient outcomes resulting in 30 day mortality, ICU admission and length of stay greater than 3, 7, 14, and 28 days. Results: Hospital length of stay was reduced by an average of 6.3 days for CO@h patients (6.9 95% CI [5.6 - 8.1]) in comparison to Non-CO@h (13.2 95% CI [12.2 - 14.1]). The most significant odds ratio effect was on mortality (0.23 95%CI [0.11 - 0.49]), followed by length of stay > 14 days (OR 0.23 95%CI [0.13 - 0.42]), length of stay > 28 days (OR 0.23 95%CI [0.08 - 0.65]), length of stay > 7 days (OR 0.35 95%CI [0.24 - 0.52]), and length of stay > 3 days (OR 0.52 95%CI [0.35 - 0.78]). Mortality and length of stay outcomes were statistically significant. Only 5/137 (3.6%) where admitted to ICU compared with 52/633 (8.2%) for Non-CO@h. Conclusions: CO@h has demonstrated considerably improved patient outcomes reducing the odds of longer length hospital stays and mortality.

Shift-Based Staffing Model Cuts Costs, Length of Stay

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Staffing Model

scholarly journals 191. oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment in Skin and Soft Tissue Infections as a Consequence of Intravenous Drug Use: A Retrospective Study to Demonstrate Noninferiority

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S224-S224
Author(s):  
Aryn M Andrzejewski ◽  
J Alex Viehman
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Oral Therapy ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Treatment Completion ◽  
Intravenous Drug ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Intravenous Drug Use ◽  
Oral Group

Abstract Background Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most prevalent infectious complications of intravenous drug use (IVDU). Given its polymicrobial nature, studies focusing on SSTIs in the general population may not be generalizable this group. We completed a retrospective chart review to better characterize the safety and efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics for the treatment SSTIs in IVDU. Methods We reviewed patients admitted with bacterial SSTIs and IVDU from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2019 based on ICD-10 codes. SSTIs complicated by bacteremia, endocarditis, bone or joint involvement on index admission were excluded. Patients who received &lt; 48 hours of IV antibiotics were considered oral therapy, otherwise they were considered IV therapy. Patient comorbidities, incision and drainage (I&D) status, substance use, microbiology and antimicrobial data were reviewed. Results Of 231 eligible patients, 84 received oral therapy. There was no statistical difference in patient characteristics between the two therapy groups. Streptococcus anginosus group were the most common organisms found (33%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (31%). There was no statistical difference between rates of readmission (p=0.87), recurrent primary site infection (p=1.00), repeat debridement (p=0.08) or occurrence of deep-seated infections within 90 days of treatment completion. No morality was observed. The oral group had shorter length of stay (3 vs. 5 days, p &lt; 0.001) and shorter total duration of antibiotics (10 vs. 13 days, p &lt; 0.001). Overall, 90% of those with abscess underwent I&D, which did not differ between therapy groups. Time to I&D was shorter (0 vs. 1 day, p=0.005) in the oral group. Patients who did not receive and I&D were more likely to be readmitted within 90 days (p=0.025). Conclusion In SSTIs related to IVDU, oral antibiotic therapy was noninferior to IV in terms of mortality, readmission, and deep-seated infection rates within 90 days of treatment completion and had a decreased length of stay and total treatment duration. A delay in I&D led to increased length of stay and lack of I&D increased readmission rate. Therefore, a prompt I&D may allow a safe and effective early transition to oral therapy in SSTIs related to IVDU. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Outcomes of Neutropenic Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s339-s340
Author(s):  
Roopali Sharma ◽  
Deepali Dixit ◽  
Sherin Pathickal ◽  
Jenny Park ◽  
Bernice Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
End Point ◽  
Neutropenic Patients

Background: Data from Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in neutropenic patients are still scarce. Objective: To assess outcomes of CDI in patients with and without neutropenia. Methods: The study included a retrospective cohort of adult patients at 3 academic hospitals between January 2013 and December 2017. The 2 study arms were neutropenic patients (neutrophil count <500/mm3) and nonneutropenic patients with confirmed CDI episodes. The primary outcome evaluated the composite end point of all-cause in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and treatment failure at 7 days. The secondary outcome evaluated hospital length of stay. Results: Of 962 unique cases of CDI, 158 were neutropenic (59% men) and 804 were nonneutropenic (46% men). The median age was 57 years (IQR, 44–64) in the neutropenic group and 68 years (IQR, 56–79) in the nonneutropenic group. The median Charlson comorbidity score was 5 (IQR, 3–7.8) and 4 (IQR, 3–5) in the neutropenic and nonneutropenic groups, respectively. Regarding severity, 88.6% versus 48.9% were nonsevere, 8.2% versus 47% were severe, and 3.2% versus 4.1% were fulminant in the neutropenic and nonneutropenic groups, respectively. Also, 63% of patients (60.9% in nonneutropenic, 65.2% in neutropenic) were exposed to proton-pump inhibitors. A combination CDI treatment was required in 53.2% of neutropenic patients and 50.1% of nonneutropenic patients. The primary composite end point occurred in 27% of neutropenic patients versus 22% of nonneutropenic patients (P = .257), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.30 (95% CI, 0.84–2.00). The median hospital length of stay after controlling for covariates was 21.3 days versus 14.2 days in the neutropenic and nonneutropenic groups, respectively (P < .001). Complications (defined as hypotension requiring vasopressors, ileus, or bowel perforation) were seen in 6.0% of the nonneutropenic group and 4.4% of the neutropenic group (P = .574), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.28–1.45). Conclusions: Neutropenic patients were younger and their cases were less severe; however, they had lower incidences of all-cause in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, and treatment failure. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the neutropenic group than in the nonneutropenic group.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Deficits in Identification of Goals and Goal-Concordant Care After Sepsis Hospitalization

2021 ◽  
Vol October 2021 - Online First ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Parks Taylor ◽  
Marc A Kowalkowski ◽  
Katherine R Courtright ◽  
Henry L Burke ◽  
Sangnya Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Hospital Medicine ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Clinical Documentation ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Expert Review ◽  
Sepsis Survivors

In a recent study, identifying and supporting patients’ care goals was named the highest priority in hospital medicine. Although sepsis is one of the leading causes of death and postdischarge morbidity among hospitalized patients, little is known about how frequently care goals are assessed prior to discharge and adhered to in the 90 days after sepsis hospitalization. Evaluating a cohort of 679 high-risk sepsis survivors enrolled in a clinical trial, we found that care goals were documented explicitly in a standardized tool in 130 patients; an additional 139 patients were identified using all available clinical documentation, resulting in only 269 (40%) patients with goals that could be ascertained from the electronic health record (EHR). Among those categorized, goals were classified as prioritizing longevity (35%), function (52%), and comfort (12%). Based on expert review of the care provided during the 90 days subsequent to discharge, goal-concordant care was identified in 184 (68%) cases for which goals were specified. Documentation of goals in a standardized EHR tool was associated with increased likelihood of receiving goal-concordant care (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.4-5.5). Hospitalization and peridischarge time points represent important opportunities to address deficits in the documentation of goals and provision of goal-concordant care for sepsis survivors.

scholarly journals The association between abnormal vital sign groups and undesirable patient outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Marina Lee ◽  
David McD Taylor ◽  
Antony Ugoni
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Vital Sign ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Abnormal Vital Sign

Introduction: To determine the association between both abnormal individual vital signs and abnormal vital sign groups in the emergency department, and undesirable patient outcomes: hospital admission, medical emergency team calls and death. Method: We undertook a prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral emergency department (February–May 2015). Vital signs were collected prospectively in the emergency department and undesirable outcomes from the medical records. The primary outcomes were undesirable outcomes for individual vital signs (multivariate logistic regression) and vital sign groups (univariate analyses). Results: Data from 1438 patients were analysed. Admission was associated with tachycardia, tachypnoea, fever, ≥1 abnormal vital sign on admission to the emergency department, ≥1 abnormal vital sign at any time in the emergency department, a persistently abnormal vital sign, and vital signs consistent with both sepsis (tachycardia/hypotension/abnormal temperature) and pneumonia (tachypnoea/fever) (p < 0.05). Medical emergency team calls were associated with tachycardia, tachypnoea, ≥1 abnormal vital sign on admission (odds ratio: 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–3.8), ≥2 abnormal vital signs at any time (odds ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2–4.7), and a persistently abnormal vital sign (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.6–4.6). Death was associated with Glasgow Coma Score ≤13 (odds ratio: 6.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.5–16.0), ≥1 abnormal vital sign on admission (odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.2–5.6), ≥2 abnormal vital signs at any time (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–29.5), a persistently abnormal vital sign (odds ratio: 4.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.0–9.0), and vital signs consistent with pneumonia (odds ratio: 5.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.9–14.8). Conclusion: Abnormal vital sign groups are generally superior to individual vital signs in predicting undesirable outcomes. They could inform best practice management, emergency department disposition, and communication with the patient and family.

scholarly journals Discordant American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Scoring between Anesthesiologists and Surgeons Is Correlated With Adverse Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 46284 Elective Surgical Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene Xian Wen Kwa ◽  
Jiaqian Cui ◽  
Daniel Yan Zheng Lim ◽  
Yilin Eileen Sim ◽  
Yuhe Ke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Asa Score ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Abstract BackgroundThe American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) score is used for communication of patient health status, risk scoring, benchmarking and financial claims. Prior studies using hypothetical scenarios have shown poor concordance of ASA scoring among healthcare providers. However, there is a paucity of concordance studies using real-world data, as well as studies of clinical factors or patient outcomes associated with discordant scoring. The study aims to assess real-world ASA score concordance between surgeons and anesthesiologists, factors surrounding discordance and its impact on patient outcomes. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary academic medical center on 46284 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. ASA scores entered by surgeons and anesthesiologists, patient demographics, and post-operative outcomes were collected. We assessed the concordance of preoperative ASA scoring between surgeons and anesthesiologists, clinical factors associated with score discordance, the impact of score discordance on clinically important outcomes, and the discriminative ability of the two scores for 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Statistical tests used included Cohen’s weighted 𝜅 score, chi-square test, t-test, unadjusted odds ratios and logistic regression models. ResultsThe ASA score showed moderate concordance (weighted Cohen’s 𝜅 0.53) between surgeons and anesthesiologists. 15098 patients (32.6%) had discordant scores, of which 11985 (79.4%) were scored lower by surgeons. We found significant associations between discordant scores and anesthesiologist-assessed comorbidities, patient age and race. Patients with discordant scores had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52-2.62, p<0.0001), 1-year mortality (odds ratio 1.53, 95% CI = 1.38-1.69, p < 0.0001), and ICU admission >24 hours (odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI = 1.47-1.94, p< 0.0001), and stratified analyses showed a trend towards higher risk when the surgeons’ ASA score was lower. ConclusionsThere is moderate concordance between surgeons and anesthesiologists in assigning the ASA classification. Discordant ASA scores are associated with adverse patient outcomes. Hence, there is a need for improved standardization of ASA scoring and cross-specialty review in ASA-discordant cases.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary Plans of Care, Electronic Medical Record Systems, and Inpatient Mortality

ACI Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. e21-e29
Author(s):  
Joseph Bonner ◽  
Brandon Stange ◽  
Mindy Kjar ◽  
Margaret Reynolds ◽  
Eric Hartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Experimental Setting ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Electronic Medical Record Systems ◽  
Guide Care

Background Interdisciplinary plans of care (IPOCs) guide care standardization and satisfy accreditation requirements. Yet patient outcomes associated with IPOC usage through an electronic medical record (EMR) are not present in the literature. EMR systems facilitate the documentation of IPOC use and produce data to evaluate patient outcomes. Objectives This article aimed to evaluate whether IPOC-guided care as documented in an EMR is associated with inpatient mortality. Methods We contrasted whether IPOC-guided care was associated with a patient being discharged alive. We further tested whether the association differed across strata of acuity levels and overall frequency of IPOC usage within a hospital. Results Our sample included 165,334 adult medical/surgical discharges for a 12-month period for 17 hospitals. All hospitals had 1 full year of EMR use antedating the study period. IPOCs guided care in 85% (140,187/165,334) of discharges. When IPOCs guided care, 2.1% (3,009/140,187) of admissions ended with the patient dying while in the hospital. Without IPOC-guided care, 4.3% (1,087/25,147) of admissions ended with the patient dying in the hospital. The relative likelihood of dying while in the hospital was lower when IPOCs guided care (odds ratio: 0.45; 99% confidence interval: 0.41–0.50). Conclusion In this observational study within a quasi-experimental setting of 17 community hospitals and voluntary usage, IPOC-guided care is associated with a decreased likelihood of patients dying while in the hospital.

Are Guidelines Important? Results of a Prospective Quality Improvement Lumbar Fusion Project

Neurosurgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Harrop ◽  
Alexandra Emes ◽  
Ameet Chitale ◽  
Chengyuan Wu ◽  
Fadi Al Saiegh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Surgical Indications ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Based Medicine

Abstract BACKGROUND United States (U.S.) healthcare is a volume-based inefficient delivery system. Value requires the consideration of quality, which is lacking in most healthcare disciplines. OBJECTIVE To assess whether patients who met specific evidence-based medicine (EBM)-based criteria preoperatively for lumbar fusion would achieve higher rates of achieving the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) than those who did not meet the EBM indications. METHODS All elective lumbar fusion cases, March 2018 to August 2019, were prospectively evaluated and categorized based on EBM guidelines for surgical indications. The MCID was defined as a reduction of ≥5 points in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Multiple logistic regression identified multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of EBM concordance. RESULTS A total of 325 lumbar fusion patients were entered with 6-mo follow-up data available for 309 patients (95%). The median preoperative ODI score was 24.4 with median 6-mo improvement of 7.0 points (P &lt; .0001). Based on ODI scores, 79.6% (246/309) improved, 3.8% (12/309) had no change, and 16% (51/309) worsened. A total of 191 patients had ODI improvement reaching the MCID. 93.2% (288/309) cases were EBM concordant, while 6.7% (21/309) were not. In multivariate analysis, EBM concordance (P = .0338), lower preoperative ODI (P &lt; .001), lower ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) (P = .0056), and primary surgeries (P = .0004) were significantly associated with improved functional outcome. EBM concordance conferred a 3.04 (95% CI 1.10-8.40) times greater odds of achieving MCID in ODI at 6 mo (P = .0322), adjusting for other factors. CONCLUSION This analysis provides validation of EBM guideline criteria to establish optimal patient outcomes. The EBM concordant patients had a greater than 3 times improved outcome compared to those not meeting EBM fusion criteria.

Abstract 168: Association Between Prehospital Advanced Airway Management for Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Okubo ◽  
Sho Komukai ◽  
Junichi Izawa ◽  
Koichiro Gibo ◽  
Kosuke Kiyohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Favorable Functional Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether prehospital advanced airway management (AAM: endotracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device placement) for pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) improves patient outcomes. Objective: To test the hypothesis that prehospital advanced airway management during pediatric OHCA is associated with patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide, prospective, population-based OHCA registry in Japan. We included pediatric patients (<18 years) with OHCA in whom emergency medical services (EMS) personnel resuscitated and transported to medical institutions during 2014 and 2015. The primary outcome was one-month survival. Secondary outcome was one-month survival with favorable functional outcome, defined as cerebral performance category score 1 or 2. Patients who received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by EMS personnel at any given minute were sequentially matched with patients at risk of receiving AAM within the same minutes based on time-dependent propensity score calculated from a competing risk regression model in which we treated prehospital return of spontaneous circulation as a competing risk event. Results: We included 2,548 patients; 1,017 (39.9%) were infants (<1 year), 839 (32.9%) were children (1 year to 12 years), and 692 (27.2%) were adolescents. Of the 2,548, included patients, 336 (13.2%) underwent prehospital AAM during cardiac arrest. In the time-dependent propensity score matched cohort (n = 642), there were no significant differences in one-month survival (AAM: 32/321 [10.0%] vs. no AAM: 27/321 [8.4%]; odds ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.80 to 2.21]) and one-month survival with favorable functional outcome (AAM: 6/321 [1.9%] vs. no AAM: 5/321 [1.6%]; odds ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.41 to 5.40]). Conclusions: Among pediatric patients with OHCA, we found no associations between prehospital AAM and favorable patient outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document