scholarly journals Pulmonary Embolism Does Not Have an Unusually High Incidence Among Hospitalized COVID19 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962199647
Author(s):  
Nicolas Gallastegui ◽  
Jenny Y. Zhou ◽  
Annette von Drygalski ◽  
Richard F. W. Barnes ◽  
Timothy M. Fernandes ◽  
...  

Introduction: Acute respiratory illnesses from COVID19 infection are increasing globally. Reports from earlier in the pandemic suggested that patients hospitalized for COVID19 are at particularly high risk for pulmonary embolism (PE). To estimate the incidences of PE during hospitalization for COVID19, we performed a rigorous systematic review of published literature. Methods: We searched for case series, cohort studies and clinical trials from December 1, 2019 to July 13, 2020 that reported the incidence of PE among consecutive patients who were hospitalized for COVID19 in ICUs and in non-ICU hospital wards. To reflect the general population of hospitalized COVID19 patients, we excluded studies in which subject enrollment was linked to the clinical suspicion for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Results: Fifty-seven studies were included in the analysis. The combined random effects estimate of PE incidence among all hospitalized COVID19 patients was 7.1% (95% CI: 5.2%, 9.1%). Studies with larger sample sizes reported significantly lower PE incidences than smaller studies (r2 = 0.161, p = 0.036). The PE incidence among studies that included 400 or more patients was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.7%, 4.6%). Among COVID19 patients admitted to ICUs, the combined estimated PE incidence was 13.7% (95% CI: 8.0%, 20.6%). The incidence of ICU-related PE also decreased as the study sample sizes increased. The single largest COVID19 ICU study (n = 2215) disclosed a PE incidence of 2.3% (95% CI: 1.7%, 3.0%). Conclusion: PE incidences among hospitalized COVID19 patients are much lower than has been previously postulated based on smaller, often biased study reports. The incidence of “microthrombosis,” leading to occlusion of microscopic blood vessels, remains unknown.

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S56-S56
Author(s):  
R. Ohle ◽  
H. Kareemi ◽  
J.J. Perry

Introduction: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is difficult to diagnose and if missed carries a significant mortality rate. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of history, physical exam and plain radiographs compared to advanced imaging in the diagnosis of AAD in adults presenting to the ED with a clinical suspicion of AAD. Methods: We conducted a librarian assisted systematic review. Databases searched: Pubmed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane database from 1968 to January 2016. No restrictions for language were imposed. Studies were reviewed and data extracted by two independent reviewers. AAD was defined by CTA, MRI or TEE Prospective and retrospective studies of patients presenting with a clinical suspicion of AAD were included. Case series were excluded. Studies were combined if low clinical and statistical heterogeonity (I2<30%). Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS tool. Bivariate random effects meta analyses using Revman 5 and SAS 9.3 was performed. Results: We identified 792 records: 61 selected for full text review, 13 included and a further 7 from reference searches. 20 studies with 4721 participants were included (mean QUADAS score 12/14 SD 1.2, Kappa 0.8). Prevalence of AAD ranged from 9.6-76.1% (mean 39.1% SD 17.1%). Mean diagnosis in those without AAD varied between studies with ACS (30.3% SD 30.1%), Anuerysm(12.4% SD 9.8%), Chest wall pain(18.1% SD 13.3%) and PE(7.9% SD 7.85%) being the most common. The clinical findings most suggestive of AAD were, neurological deficit (specificity 94% LR 4.1 [95% CI, 3.1-5.2], I2 0%, n=9), hypotension(specificity 94% LR 2.6 [95% CI 1.6-4.2], I2 0%, n=8), pulse deficit (specificity 92% LR 3.4 [95% CI 1.8-6.4], I2 0%, n=9) and syncope (specificity 92% LR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.8], I2 10%, n=6). The most useful for identifying patients less likely to have AAD were an absence of a widened mediastinum (sensitivity 80% LR 0.3 [95% CI 0.2-0.5], I2 20%, n=13) and an AHA Aortic dissection risk score <1 (n=2 sensitivity 91%,99% LR 0.02,0.22, [95% CI 0.003-0.128, 95%CI 0.2-0.3]). Conclusion: Suspicion for AAD should be raised with syncope, hypotension and pulse or neurological deficit in the appropriate clinical setting. Conversely the absence of a widened mediastinum and a low ADD score decreases likelihood. Clinical exam alone cannot rule out acute aortic dissection but it can help risk stratify for further testing.


Author(s):  
María de Lourdes Rodríguez Coyago ◽  
Lesly Damaris Osorio Ayala ◽  
Juan Fernando Buestán Zambrano ◽  
Jessica Micaela Yamunaqué Vire ◽  
María Paz Pinos Gavilanes ◽  
...  

Background: A variety of approaches have been developed for the control of dental caries, a pathology with high incidence and prevalence worldwide. The use of probiotic strains for the modulation of dental biofilm in the prevention of caries has been studied, but the available evidence shows varied methodologies; and the strains tested differ from one study to another. Objective: To analyse through a systematic review of clinical trials, the efficacy of using probiotic strains to prevent dental caries. Methods: A search was made in the scientific bases PubMed, Cochrane and Science Direct, prioritizing randomized double and triple-blind clinical trials from 2010 to 2020, including a total of 20 studies to be analysed. The selection criteria were consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews protocol. Results: Within the studies, different types of probiotic bacteria were analysed, dominating Lactobacillus Paracasei. While most clinical trials show a favorable response in terms of a significant reduction of Streptococcus mutans in the oral microbiota, very few studies evaluated salivary pH and sIgA levels. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of the studies analysed and the multifactorial nature of dental caries do not allow us to ensure that probiotic therapy is completely effective in preventing this pathology. Although probiotic therapy can help by regulating the microbiological factor, there are other determinants that can favor the development of caries and that are barely approached in their relationship with bacteriotherapy. Future studies that homogeneously evaluate the use of probiotics could give us a clearer idea of their effectiveness.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Unaiza Faizan ◽  
Muhammad Saad Farooqi ◽  
Hassaan Imtiaz ◽  
Muhammad Yasir Anwar ◽  
Muhammad Khawar Sana ◽  
...  

Introduction: POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy/edema, myeloma protein, skin changes) is a rare disorder associated with plasma cell neoplasia where an overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upregulates vasculogenesis and increases vascular permeability resulting in multiple symptoms of the disease e.g. edema and hemangioma. Although the limited-stage disease can be treated with radiotherapy, treatment for the more advanced disease remains unclear. Here we offer a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens used to treat POEMS syndrome in the adult population. Methods: Databases i.e. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched since inception through May 15th, 2020, following the PRISMA guidelines. Out of 421 studies, 8 articles (5 prospective clinical trials, and 3 retrospective studies) were included. Phase I clinical trials, abstracts, case reports, case series, and review articles were excluded. Results: A total of 171 patients (21-79 years of age) were evaluated in 8 clinical studies. Immunomodulator Based Regimens: In the 5 clinical studies (N=96) where lenalidomide (Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) were used, the hematological (heme) complete response (CR) ranged from 20% to 46%. Heme CR was defined as the absence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in serum or urine. VEGF CR defined as normalization of serum VEGF levels ranged from 35% to 80%. Neurological response defined as the improvement in the overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) by at least one score ranged from 0% to 95%. These studies reported 2-3 year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 59% to 92% and 90% to 100%, respectively. In the study by Suichi et al. (N=5), VEGF CR was reported to be 80%. However, no neurological improvement was seen in these patients. Proteasome Inhibitor Based Regimens: In the study by He et al. (N=20) bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and Dex yielded heme, VEGF, and neurological responses in 76%, 88%, and 95% of the patients, respectively. No grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse effects (TRAE) were seen. Conventional Chemotherapy Based Regimens: In the phase II trial conducted by Misawa et al. (N=25) the reduction in serum VEGF levels, as well as clinical response as measured by improvement in muscle strength, was higher in the thalidomide arm as compared to the placebo arm. Grade ≥3 TRAE reported in the treatment arm were cardiac arrest, heart failure, and dehydration in 1 (8%) patient each. In the study by Li et al. (N=31) melphalan (Mel) in combination with Dex achieved heme, VEGF, and neurological response rates of 81%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Twenty percent of the patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAE. Conclusion: Immunomodulator and chemotherapy based regimens appear to have a reasonable safety and efficacy profile. Lenalidomide and melphalan based therapies were most effective. Proteasome inhibitors based regimens yielded efficacious results without significant toxicity. More studies with existing and newer combinations with autologous stem cell transplantation are warranted. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Author(s):  
Pinky Kotecha ◽  
Alexander Light ◽  
Enrico Checcucci ◽  
Daniele Amparore ◽  
Cristian Fiori ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the data currently available regarding the repurposing of different drugs for Covid-19 treatment. Participants with suspected or diagnosed Covid-19 will be included. The interventions being considered are drugs being repurposed, and comparators will include standard of care treatment or placebo.MethodsWe searched Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trial registration site in the UK(NIHR), Europe (clinicaltrialsregister.eu), US (ClinicalTrials.gov) and internationally (isrctn.com), and reviewed the reference lists of articles for eligible articles published up to April 22, 2020. All studies in English that evaluated the efficacy of the listed drugs were included. Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess study quality. This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol is available at PROSPERO (CRD42020180915).ResultsFrom 708 identified studies or clinical trials, 16 studies and 16 case reports met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 were randomized controlled trials (763 patients), 7 cohort studies (321 patients) and 3 case series (191 patients). Chloroquine (CQ) had a 100% discharge rate compared to 50% with lopinavir-ritonavir at day 14, however a trial has recommended against a high dosage due to cardiotoxic events. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown no significant improvement in negative seroconversion rate which is also seen in our meta-analysis (p=0.68). Adverse events with HCQ have a significant difference compared to the control group (p=0.001). Lopinavir-ritonavir has shown no improvement in time to clinical improvement which is seen in our meta-analyses (p=0.1). Remdesivir has shown no significant improvement in time to clinical improvement but this trial had insufficient power.DiscussionDue to the paucity in evidence, it is difficult to establish the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of Covid-19 as currently there is no significant clinical effectiveness of the repurposed drugs. Further large clinical trials are required to achieve more reliable findings. A risk-benefit analysis is required on an individual basis to weigh out the potential improvement in clinical outcome and viral load reduction compared to the risks of the adverse events. (1-16)


2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752110461
Author(s):  
Giovanni Cunha ◽  
Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho ◽  
Lílian Caldas Quirino ◽  
Luiz Henrique Soares Torres ◽  
Valfrido Antônio Pereira Filho ◽  
...  

Study Design: A systematic review according to PRISMA statement has been designed to answer the preliminary question: “ In titanium mesh exposures, is there a treatment alternative which leads to an increased graft maintenance?” and fill the PICO assessment out. Objective: To review studies published in the past 20 years (1999-2019) in which mesh exposure has occurred, detecting the suitable approaches to treat exposure allowing the graft maintenance. Methods: Initial search on PUBMED, SCOPUS, and COCHRANE databases resulted in 777 articles, and hand-searching identified 6 articles. After removing duplicates and unrelated articles, eligibility criteria were applied, and 31 studies were selected (randomized clinical trials, retrospective/prospective clinical trials, and case series). Results: A total of 677 surgical sites and 225 cases of mesh exposure were identified. Eleven treatments have been identified. Chlorhexidine was the primary approach in 46% of cases, followed by oral hygiene instructions and follow-up with 22.5% of occurrences. In 21% of clinical situations, titanium mesh removal was the treatment of choice, associated with other measures (i.e., antibiotic prescription). There seems to be a consensus in cases of infection. When this complication was associated with tissue dehiscence, the primary treatment was mesh removal. The same does not occur when the site needs to be cleaned for long-term periods. Conclusion: In 2 decades of use of titanium meshes, the available treatments do not seem to have evolved, and there is not enough data to establish a guideline.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Renée V. E. Dagenais ◽  
Victoria C. Su ◽  
Bradley S. Quon

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies target the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis (CF), and are generally well-tolerated; however, real-world studies indicate the frequency of discontinuation and adverse events (AEs) may be higher than what was observed in clinical trials. The objectives of this systematic review were to summarize real-world AEs reported for market-available CFTR modulators (i.e., ivacaftor (IVA), lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA), tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA), and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)), and to identify ways in which the pharmacist on CF healthcare teams may contribute to mitigating and managing these AEs. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection online databases were searched from 2012 to 1 Aug 2020. Full manuscripts or conference abstracts of observational studies, case series, and case reports were eligible for inclusion. The included full manuscripts and conference abstracts comprised of 54 observational studies, 5 case series, and 9 case reports. The types of AEs reported generally aligned with what have been observed in clinical trials. LUM/IVA was associated with a higher frequency of respiratory-related AE and discontinuation in real-world studies. A signal for mental health and neurocognitive AEs was identified with all 4 CFTR modulators. A systematic approach to monitoring for AEs in people with CF on CFTR modulators in the real-world setting is necessary to help better understand potential AEs, as well as patient characteristics that may be associated with higher risk of certain AEs. Pharmacists play a key role in the safe initiation and monitoring of people with CF on CFTR modulator therapies.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 35-35
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ashar Ali ◽  
Anam Khan ◽  
Sana Irfan Khan ◽  
Sobia Aamir ◽  
Saad Ur Rahman ◽  
...  

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is caused by mutation of beta-globin chain alleles, with the involvement of at least one sickle mutation. Sickling of red cells leads to hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusions, and inflammation. Voxelotor (GBT440) is a hemoglobin modulator that prevents polymerization by increasing the affinity of hemoglobin with oxygen. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of voxelotor in SCD patients. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform the literature search and selection of articles for this systematic review. A search was performed using databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. We used the following keywords, "Voxelotor" OR "Benzaldehydes" OR "GBT440" AND "Sickle Cell Anemia" from the inception of literature till 04/25/2020. Out of 475 articles, we screened and included three clinical trials and a case series measuring the efficacy (i-e, change in Hemoglobin (Hb), Hb modification, etc.) and safety (adverse events) in clinical terms (N=359). We excluded case reports, pre-clinical studies, review articles, and meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included data on 359 patients, with 12-67 years of age. In Blyden et al. 2018, authors presented a case series of 7 patients with advanced SCD treated with 700 mg-1500 mg voxelotor. With treatment, vaso-occlusive episodes related hospitalizations decreased by 67%, hemoglobin levels, and markers of hemolysis improved in all patients. Authors in Hutchaleelaha et al. 2019 randomly assigned 24 participants to a once-daily dose of 900 mg, 600 mg, 300 mg voxelotor, and placebo for 15 days. With treatment, hemoglobin modification was maximum in the 900 mg voxelotor group. Headache and diarrhea were the only adverse events related to voxelotor treatment. No grade 3 adverse events were reported. In phase I/II trial by Howard et al. 2019, (n=54) 38 patients were followed for 28 days, and 16 patients were followed for &gt;90 days. The compliance for study drug was 91%. In the 28-day cohort, treatment with 1000 mg of voxelotor showed maximum improvement in hemoglobin level, reticulocyte count, and unconjugated bilirubin. In &gt;90-day cohort, the improvement in hemoglobin, unconjugated bilirubin, and reticulocyte count were statistically significant in favor of 900 mg voxelotor treatment as compared to placebo (p&lt;0.05). LDH showed variability with treatment. Vaso-occlusive episodes seen in voxelotor groups were reported when the treatment was on hold or after the last dose. No grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. In a randomized placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial by Vichinsky et al. 2019, two doses of voxelotor 1500 mg (N=90) and 900 mg (N=92) were compared with placebo (N=92). 12-65 years old SCD patients were followed for 24 weeks. After treatment, improvement in hemoglobin was statistically significant in favor of 1500 mg voxelotor vs. placebo. Moreover, markers of hemolysis, reticulocyte count, and indirect bilirubin levels were also significantly improved in favor of 1500mg voxelotor treatment vs. placebo. The incidence of vaso-occlusive crisis episodes was similar in 1500 mg, 700 mg, and placebo groups (p&gt;0.05). Treatment-related adverse events were seen in 94%, 93%, and 89% of participants in 1500mg, 700mg, and placebo groups, respectively. (Table 1) There are 6 ongoing clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov (n=665) to determine the efficacy and safety of high doses of voxelotor and its use in children below 12 years. (Table 2) Conclusion: Voxelotor has an acceptable safety profile in sickle cell disease patients of 12 years or older. Voxelotor has shown a dose-dependent improvement in hemoglobin levels and markers of hemolysis, which is associated with a reduction in end-organ damage. Moreover, the increase in hemoglobin was not associated with an increase in vaso-occlusive crisis episodes, in contrast to the other hemoglobin modulator (senicapoc). Additional large prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.:Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1489
Author(s):  
Mohamed S. Munner ◽  
Charles A. Ritchie ◽  
Ibrahim H. Elkhidir ◽  
Doaa T. Mohammadat ◽  
Hussein J. Ahmed ◽  
...  

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic, which is associated with venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to estimate the pooled incidence of PE among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 within the published literature. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search using MEDLINE /PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and OpenGray databases was conducted May 19th, 2020. Eligible studies included sufficient data to calculate the incidence of PE diagnosed during hospitalization in patients with COVID-19. Case reports were excluded. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (observational cohort and case-control), AXIS tool (cross-sectional), and quality assessment tool (case series). Demographics and PE incidence data were extracted from the included studies and analyzed with R language. The pooled incidence of PE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was calculated. Results: The database search identified 128 records. Ten observational studies were eligible and were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1722 patients (mean age= 63.36). .The incidence of PE was noted to be higher in males. The D-dimer levels were specified between PE group and non-PE group in only three studies, while the remaining either reported it improperly or had missing data.The pooled PE incidence in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was 17% (95% CI: 0.1-0.26). There was a high degree of study heterogeneity (I2 = 94%, p<0.01). Conclusion: The pooled PE incidence in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is 17%. This increased incidence is greater than that previously reported in the general population of non-COVID-19. Attention and further investigation of this risk is warranted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii317-iii318
Author(s):  
T L B Nghia ◽  
M N Y ◽  
M E Morra ◽  
N L Vuong ◽  
N M Tin ◽  
...  

Basal Ganglia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Andrzejewski ◽  
Richard Barbano ◽  
Jonathan Mink

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document