A novel technique of axillary vein puncture involving peripherally inserted central venous catheters for a small basilic vein

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumito Saijo ◽  
Yoshinobu Odaka ◽  
Mitsuhisa Mutoh ◽  
Yu Katayose ◽  
Hiromi Tokumura
Keyword(s):  
Small Diameter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Axillary Vein ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Peripheral Venous Catheter ◽  
Brachial Vein ◽  
Subcutaneous Tunnel

Purpose: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are some of the most useful devices for vascular access used globally. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters have a low rate of fatal mechanical complications when compared to non-tunnel central venous catheters. However, as peripherally inserted central venous catheter access requires a smaller vein, there is a high risk of thrombosis. The axillary vein (confluence of the basilic and brachial veins) can serve as an access for cannulation. Moreover, as this vein is larger than the basilic or brachial vein, it might be a superior option for preventing thrombosis. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection should be considered when the puncture site is at the axillary fossa. The aim of this study was to present our new protocol involving peripherally inserted central venous catheters (non-tunneled/tunneled) and a tunneling technique and assess its feasibility and safety for improving cannulation and preventing thrombosis and infection. Methods: The study included 20 patients. The axillary vein in the upper arm was used for peripherally inserted central venous catheters in patients with a small-diameter basilic vein (<3 mm). When the puncture site was in the axillary fossa, a subcutaneous tunnel of about 3 cm was constructed easily using a peripheral venous catheter. Results: The observed catheter duration was 645 days (median ± standard deviation, 26 ± 22.22 days). Catheterization was successful in all cases, however, two accidental dislodgements were identified. No fatal or serious complications were observed after catheterization. Conclusion: Our new protocol for axillary peripherally inserted central venous catheters/tunneled axillary peripherally inserted central venous catheters use for a small-diameter basilic vein is safe and feasible.

The value of real-time ultrasound-guidance for definite placement of a right supraclavicular subclavian central venous catheter

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982199853
Author(s):  
Jens M Poth ◽  
Stefan F Ehrentraut ◽  
Se-Chan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Needle Insertion ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Axillary Vein ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Supraclavicular Fossa ◽  
The Right ◽  
High Index Of Suspicion ◽  
Insertion Process

Central venous catheters (CVC) are widely used in critically ill patients and in those undergoing major surgery. Significant adverse events, such as pneumothorax and hemothorax, can be caused by needle insertion during CVC insertion. CVC misplacement is less often described, yet equally important, as it can lead to deleterious complications. Here, we describe a case in which misplacement of a guidewire following infraclavicular puncture of the right axillary vein was detected by continuous ultrasound employing the right supraclavicular fossa view. Utilizing this ultrasound view, the insertion approach to the vessel was changed and correct CVC placement could be achieved. While ultrasound guidance is widely accepted for vessel puncture, this case demonstrates the value of continuous ultrasound guidance for the entire process of CVC insertion: vessel puncture, correct guidewire advancement, catheter placement, and exclusion of complications such as pneumothorax. It also shows that there should be a high index of suspicion for guidewire misplacement, even after successful venipuncture. In conclusion, ultrasound protocols covering the complete CVC insertion process should be implemented into current clinical practice.

A bedside rescue method for retrieving retained guidewires: The ‘Suck Out’ technique

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094345
Author(s):  
Maryanne Z A Mariyaselvam ◽  
Vikesh Patel ◽  
Adam Sawyer ◽  
James A Richardson ◽  
Jonathan Dean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Patient Harm ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Never Event ◽  
Benchtop Model

Background: Central venous catheter guidewire retention is classed as a ‘never event’ in the United Kingdom, with the potential for significant patient harm. If the retained guidewire remains within the central venous catheter lumen, bedside techniques may facilitate guidewire retrieval. However, these techniques may be ineffective if the guidewire has already passed below skin level. We investigated a novel ‘suck out’ technique for bedside guidewire retrieval and compared this against traditional retrieval methods. Methods: Simulation 1: in a benchtop model, seven different central venous catheters had their corresponding guidewire placed in the last 2 cm of the catheter tip which was immersed horizontally in fluid. A 50-mL syringe was attached to the distal lumen central venous catheter hub and suction applied for 5 s, and the distance of guidewire retraction was recorded. Simulation 2: a central venous catheter guidewire was intentionally retained within the catheter at either 5 cm above or below skin level in a pigskin model. Simple catheter withdrawal, catheter clamping withdrawal and the ‘suck out’ method were compared for efficacy using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Simulation 1: retained guidewires were retracted by 13 cm on average. Simulation 2: when guidewires were retained 5 cm above skin level, all retrieval methods were 100% effective; however, when retained 5 cm below skin level, simple catheter withdrawal was ineffective, clamping and withdrawal was only 10% effective and the ‘suck out’ technique was 90% effective (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ‘suck out’ technique can effectively retract guidewires retained within central venous catheter lumens and demonstrates superiority over traditional methods of retained guidewire extraction in simulated models.

scholarly journals Care of Peripheral Venous Catheter Sites: Advantages of Transparent Film Dressings Over Tape and Gauze

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie F. Bernatchez
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Peripheral Venous Catheter ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Review Current ◽  
Peripheral Venous Line

AbstractPeripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters are the most commonly used catheters in hospitals, with up to 70% of patients requiring a peripheral venous line during their hospital stay. This represents 200 million PIV catheters used per year in acute-care hospitals in the United States alone. These medical devices are also used in other health care settings, such as long-term care facilities and nursing homes, and common indications include the administration of medications, nutrients, and fluids. These catheters require proper maintenance and care to avoid complications such as phlebitis, infiltration, occlusion, local infection, and bloodstream infection. Recently it has been suggested that PIV catheter use may lead to a higher rate of complications than previously thought. This is important because some studies have claimed that the rate of bloodstream infections due to PIV catheters is actually comparable to the rates observed with central venous catheters, rather than much lower as previously thought. Moreover, catheter-related infections are now seen as largely preventable. Our goal was to review the current literature and provide an overview of the various approaches used to manage PIV catheter sites as well as review current recommendations.

The retrograde tunnel: a method for the fixation of central venous catheters in the military environment

1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-77
Author(s):  
R. A. Wheeler ◽  
T. J. W. Spalding ◽  
J. A. Thomas ◽  
G. A. Carss
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Line ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Patient Transfer ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Medical Facilities ◽  
Subcutaneous Tunnel ◽  
Paediatric Practice ◽  
The Military

AbstractCentral venous catheters (CVCs) are prone to accidental removal during patient transportation. Of the casualties who require transfer between medical facilities, those with CVC in situ require additional vigilance to prevent loss of the CVC, which continues to occur despite various methods of fixation. The fashioning of a subcutaneous tunnel has become an integral part of the placement of central venous catheters. Several methods have been described, but the long-term CVCs in paediatric practice pose special problems, particularly that of the patients continually testing the CVCs fixation. Using a new polyurethane CVC, a retrograde tunnelling technique has been developed which affords immediate and secure fixation. We propose that this CVC, together with the technique of retrograde tunnelling, is the solution to inadvertent central venous line removal during patient transfer.

Risk factor identification and predictive models for central line requirements for patients on vasopressors

2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2110242
Author(s):  
Adrian D Haimovich ◽  
Ruoyi Jiang ◽  
Richard A Taylor ◽  
Justin B Belsky
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

Vasopressors are ubiquitous in intensive care units. While central venous catheters are the preferred route of infusion, recent evidence suggests peripheral administration may be safe for short, single-agent courses. Here, we identify risk factors and develop a predictive model for patient central venous catheter requirement using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, a single-centre dataset of patients admitted to an intensive care unit between 2008 and 2019. Using prior literature, a composite endpoint of prolonged single-agent courses (>24 hours) or multi-agent courses of any duration was used to identify likely central venous catheter requirement. From a cohort of 69,619 intensive care unit stays, there were 17,053 vasopressor courses involving one or more vasopressors that met study inclusion criteria. In total, 3807 (22.3%) vasopressor courses involved a single vasopressor for less than six hours, 7952 (46.6%) courses for less than 24 hours and 5757 (33.8%) involved multiple vasopressors of any duration. Of these, 3047 (80.0%) less than six-hour and 6423 (80.8%) less than 24-hour single vasopressor courses used a central venous catheter. Logistic regression models identified associations between the composite endpoint and intubation (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.16 to 2.58), cardiac diagnosis (OR 0.72, CI 0.65 to 0.80), renal impairment (OR 1.61, CI 1.50 to 1.74), older age (OR 1.002, Cl 1.000 to 1.005) and vital signs in the hour before initiation (heart rate, OR 1.006, CI 1.003 to 1.009; oxygen saturation, OR 0.996, CI 0.993 to 0.999). A logistic regression model predicting the composite endpoint had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (standard deviation) of 0.747 (0.013) and an accuracy of 0.691 (0.012). This retrospective study reveals a high prevalence of short vasopressor courses in intensive care unit settings, a majority of which were administered using central venous catheters. We identify several important risk factors that may help guide clinicians deciding between peripheral and central venous catheter administration, and present a predictive model that may inform future prospective trials.

A New Formula-Based Measurement Guide for Optimal Positioning of Central Venous Catheters

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phllip Lum
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Insertion Sites ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
New Formula ◽  
Percutaneous Insertion

Abstract Purpose: To validate the formula-based central venous catheter (CVC) length measurement “tailored” to individual's height and access site for predicting optimum SVC tip position. Method: A prospective study of 3 percutaneous insertion sites (PICC, SCC and JC). Formula-based “LUM'S CVC MEASUREMENT GUIDE” was used to determine the catheter length. Results: Overall, 97% (373) of the total 382 insertions were successfully placed with CVC tip in the distal SVC (SVC between carina and atrio-cava junction) location. Conclusion: The “tailored fit” formula to individual patient height is a reliable tool to predict CVC length. Appropriate catheter length can greatly reduce the guesswork and possibility of complications related to tip malposition.

Conventional central venous catheters as tunnelled mid-clavicular midline catheters: Description of novel application and outcome analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982098287
Author(s):  
Sivashanmugam Thiyagarajan ◽  
Charulatha Ravindran
Keyword(s):  
Blood Stream Infection ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Cost Constraints

Background: Long peripheral catheters are the ideal devices for intermediate venous access (1–4 weeks). However due to non-availability and cost constraints, these lines are not widely adapted in developing countries. In this clinical report we describe a technique of using conventional Central Venous Catheters as Midclavicular midlines for intermediate venous access and present the outcome analysis of such catheters in the last 2 years from our institute. Methods: A single lumen conventional central venous catheter (5 Fr, 20 cm) was introduced through the deep veins of the upper arm, 1 to 1.5 cm distal to the axillary crease. The catheter was tunnelled for a distance of 5 to 7 cm to exit from Dawson’s green zone to reduce the incidence of Midline Associated Blood Stream Infection. Patients were followed up by trained staff nurses and outcome parameters were recorded. Results: Seventy six patients were enrolled and 72 patients underwent successful cannulation and completed the outcome analysis. Administration of intravenous antibiotics and chemotherapy were the commonest indications. The device served the intended duration of therapy in 66 (92%) patients for a median number of 12 (6–20) catheter days. Device related blood stream infection was 1.24/1000 catheter days and catheter related thrombosis rate was 8.3%. Conclusion: Conventional Central Venous Catheters can be effectively used as tunnelled Midclavicular midline catheters in low resource settings. The successful outcome analysis has to be confirmed by larger studies.

Central venous catheters and upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis complicating immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 3049-3051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron P. Hong ◽  
Deborah J. Cook ◽  
Christopher S. Sigouin ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a transient antibody-mediated hypercoagulability state strongly associated with lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Whether HIT is additionally associated with upper-limb DVT—either with or without central venous catheter (CVC) use—is unknown. We therefore studied 260 patients with antibody-positive HIT to determine the influence of CVC use on frequency and localization of upper-extremity DVT in comparison with 2 non-HIT control populations (postoperative orthopedic surgery and intensive-care unit patients). Compared with the control populations, both upper- and lower-extremity DVTs were found to be associated with HIT. Upper-extremity DVTs occurred more frequently in HIT patients with a CVC (14 of 145 [9.7%]) versus none of 115 (0%) patients without a CVC (P = .000 35). All upper-extremity DVTs occurred at the CVC site (right, 12; left, 2; kappa = 1.0; P = .011). We conclude that a localizing vascular injury (CVC use) and a systemic hypercoagulability disorder (HIT) interact to explain upper-extremity DVT complicating HIT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document