Racial Differences in the Prognosis and Survival of Cutaneous Melanoma From 1990 to 2020 in North America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 120347542110528
Author(s):  
Megan Lam ◽  
Jie Wei Zhu ◽  
Angie Hu ◽  
Jennifer Beecker

Background Factors influencing the difference in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in racial minority groups are well-described in the literature and include atypical presentations and socioeconomic factors that impede access to care. Objective To characterize the differences in melanoma survival outcomes between non-Hispanic white patients and ethnic minority patients in North America. Methods We conducted searches of Embase via Ovid and MEDLINE via Ovid of studies published from 1989 to August 5, 2020. We included observational studies in North America which reported crude or effect estimate data on patient survival with cutaneous melanoma stratified by race. Results Forty-four studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Pooled analysis revealed that black patients were at a significantly increased risk for overall mortality (HR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.25-1.60), as well as for melanoma-specific mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI, 1.03-1.56). Pooled analyses using a representative study for each database yielded similar trends. Other ethnic minorities were also more likely report lower melanoma-specific survival compared to non-Hispanic white patients. Conclusion Our results support findings that melanoma patients of ethnic minorities, particularly black patients, experience worse health outcomes with regards to mortality. Overall survival and melanoma-specific survival are significantly decreased in black patients compared to non-Hispanic white patients. With the advent of more effective, contemporary treatments such as immunotherapy, our review identifies a gap in the literature investigating present-day or prospective data on melanoma outcomes, in order to characterize how current racial differences compare to findings from previous decades.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Sumit Gupta ◽  
David T. Teachey ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Yunfeng Dai ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Health disparities are major issue for racial, ethnic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Though outcomes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have steadily improved, identifying persistent disparities is critical. Prior studies evaluating ALL outcomes by race or ethnicity have noted narrowing disparities or that residual disparities are secondary to differences in leukemia biology or socioeconomic status (SES). We aimed to identify persistent inequities by race/ethnicity and SES in childhood ALL in the largest cohort ever assembled for this purpose. Methods: We identified a cohort of newly-diagnosed patients with ALL, age 0-30.99 years who were enrolled on COG trials between 2004-2019. Race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic white vs. Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic Black vs. non-Hispanic Asian vs. Non-Hispanic other. SES was proxied by insurance status: United States (US) Medicaid (public health insurance for low-income individuals) vs. US other (predominantly private insurance) vs. non-US patients (mainly jurisdictions with universal health insurance). Event-free and overall survival (EFS, OS) were compared across race/ethnicity and SES. The relative contribution of disease prognosticators (age, sex, white blood cell count, lineage, central nervous system status, cytogenetics, end Induction minimal residual disease) was examined with Cox proportional hazard multivariable models of different combinations of the three constructs of interest (race/ethnicity, SES, disease prognosticators) and examining hazard ratio (HR) attenuation between models. Results: The study cohort included 24,979 children, adolescents, and young adults with ALL. Non-Hispanic White patients were 13,872 (65.6%) of the cohort, followed by 4,354 (20.6%) Hispanic patients and 1,517 (7.2%) non-Hispanic Black patients. Those insured with US Medicaid were 6,944 (27.8%). Five-year EFS (Table 1) was 87.4%±0.3% among non-Hispanic White patients vs. 82.8%±0.6% [HR 1.37, 95 th confidence interval (95CI) 1.26-1.49; p<0.0001] among Hispanic patients and 81.9%±1.2% (HR 1.45, 95CI 1.28-1.56; p<0.0001) among non-Hispanic Black patients. Outcomes for non-Hispanic Asian patients were similar to those of non-Hispanic White patients. US patients on Medicaid had inferior 5-year EFS as compared to other US patients (83.2%±0.5% vs. 86.3%±0.3%, HR 1.21, 95CI 1.12-1.30; p<0.0001) while non-US patients had the best outcomes (5-year EFS 89.0%±0.7%, HR 0.78, 95CI 0.71-0.88; p<0.0001). There was substantial imbalance in traditional disease prognosticators (e.g. T-cell lineage) across both race/ethnicity and SES, and of race/ethnicity by SES. For example, T-lineage ALL accounted for 17.6%, 9.4%, and 6.6% of Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic patients respectively (p<0.0001). Table 2 shows the multivariable models and illustrates different patterns of HR adjustment among specific racial/ethnic and SES groups. Inferior EFS among Hispanic patients was substantially attenuated by the addition of disease prognosticators (HR decreased from 1.37 to 1.17) and further (but not fully) attenuated by the subsequent addition of SES (HR 1.11). In contrast, the increased risk among non-Hispanic Black children was minimally attenuated by both the addition of disease prognosticators and subsequent addition of SES (HR 1.45 to 1.38 to 1.32). Similarly, while the superior EFS of non-US insured patients was substantially attenuated by the addition of race/ethnicity and disease prognosticators (HR 0.79 to 0.94), increased risk among US Medicaid patients was minimally attenuated by the addition of race/ethnicity or disease prognosticators (HR 1.21 to 1.16). OS disparities followed similar patterns but were consistently worse than in EFS, particularly among patients grouped as non-Hispanic other. Conclusions: Substantial disparities in survival outcomes persist by race/ethnicity and SES in the modern era. Our findings suggest that reasons for these disparities vary between specific disadvantaged groups. Additional work is required to identify specific drivers of survival disparities that may be mitigated by targeted interventions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gupta: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Teachey: NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy; BEAM Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Zweidler-McKay: ImmunoGen: Current Employment. Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (18) ◽  
pp. e1664-e1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Burke ◽  
Chunyang Feng ◽  
Lesli E. Skolarus

ObjectiveTo explore racial differences in disability at the time of first postdischarge disability assessment.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with primary ischemic stroke (ICD-9,433.x1, 434.x1, 436) or intracerebral hemorrhage (431) diagnosed from 2011 to 2014. Racial differences in poststroke disability were measured in the initial postacute care setting (inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility, or home health) with the Pseudo-Functional Independence Measure. Given that assignment into postacute care setting may be nonrandom, patient location during the first year after stroke admission was explored.ResultsA total of 390,251 functional outcome assessments (white = 339,253, 87% vs black = 50,998, 13%) were included in the primary analysis. At the initial functional assessment, black patients with stroke had greater disability than white patients with stroke across all 3 postacute care settings. The difference between white and black patients with stroke was largest in skilled nursing facilities (black patients 1.8 points lower than white patients, 11% lower) compared to the other 2 settings. Conversely, 30-day mortality was greater in white patients with stroke compared to black patients with stroke (18.4% vs 12.6% [p < 0.001]) and a 3 percentage point difference in mortality persisted at 1 year. Black patients with stroke were more likely to be in each postacute care setting at 30 days, but only very small differences existed at 1 year.ConclusionsBlack patients with stroke have 30% lower 30-day mortality than white patients with stroke, but greater short-term disability. The reasons for this disconnect are uncertain, but the pattern of reduced mortality coupled with increased disability suggests that racial differences in care preferences may play a role.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10576-10576
Author(s):  
Colin Wikholm ◽  
Shiva Shankar Vangimalla ◽  
Ehab Abaza ◽  
Akram Ahmad ◽  
Ioannis Pothoulakis ◽  
...  

10576 Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and use of immunosuppressive therapy in IBD is linked with increased risk of leukemia. We studied the NIS database from 2003-2017 to analyze trends in any type of leukemia in IBD hospitalizations over time and examined the role of age, sex, and race. Methods: We analyzed NIS data of all adult hospitalizations for ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) with any type of leukemia as a primary or secondary diagnosis using validated ICD 9/10 codes. Age, sex, and racial demographics were collected. Trend analysis of leukemia was performed with Cochran-Armitage and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests. Results: Overall Trends: From 2003-2017, a total of 11,385 of 2,235,413 (0.51%) CD hospitalizations and 8,105 of 1,324,746 (0.61%) UC hospitalizations contained diagnosis of leukemia. An increase in leukemia was seen in both CD and UC group from 0.24% to 0.79% (pTrend < 0.0001) and 0.28% to 0.81% (pTrend < 0.0001) respectively. Sex: In both UC and CD patients, leukemia diagnoses were predominantly male in 2003 but approximated a near 1:1 ratio by 2017 (Table). In CD, the proportion of female (FEM) leukemia diagnoses grew from 31.33% to 45.05% from 2003 to 2017 (pTrend = 0.1898). In UC, the proportion of female leukemia diagnoses grew from 27.49% to 45.79% from 2003 to 2017 (pTrend = 0.0030). Age: Leukemia was more common with increasing age, with no significant changes in proportion of cases between age groups over time (pTrend >.05). Ethnicity: White patients composed 87.80% and 84.24% of leukemia diagnoses in CD and UC, respectively. In CD, an increasing proportion of leukemia diagnoses occurred in black (BK) patients, and a decreasing proportion occurred in white patients (pTrends <.0001; Table 1) during the study time. No trends in race were observed in the UC group (pTrend = 0.4229). Conclusions: Our study showed an increased prevalence of leukemia in CD and UC hospitalizations from 2003-2017 which may be related to increasing use of immunosuppressants such as anti-TNF medications. In both CD and UC, leukemia was male-predominant, but increasingly female by 2017. Rate of leukemia diagnosis increased with age. In the CD group but not the UC group, leukemia was increasingly prevalent in black patients.[Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley A Kaseweter ◽  
Brian B Drwecki ◽  
Kenneth M Prkachin

BACKGROUND: Evidence of inadequate pain treatment as a result of patient race has been extensively documented, yet remains poorly understood. Previous research has indicated that nonwhite patients are significantly more likely to be undertreated for pain.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether previous findings of racial biases in pain treatment recommendations and empathy are generalizable to a sample of Canadian observers and, if so, to determine whether empathy biases mediate the pain treatment disparity.METHODS: Fifty Canadian undergraduate students (24 men and 26 women) watched videos of black and white patients exhibiting facial expressions of pain. Participants provided pain treatment decisions and reported their feelings of empathy for each patient.RESULTS: Participants demonstrated both a prowhite treatment bias and a prowhite empathy bias, reporting more empathy for white patients than black patients and prescribing more pain treatment for white patients than black patients. Empathy was found to mediate the effect of race on pain treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study closely replicate those from a previous study of American observers, providing evidence that a prowhite bias is not a peculiar feature of the American population. These results also add support to the claim that empathy plays a crucial role in racial pain treatment disparity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellie Brown ◽  
Samantha L Lo Monaco ◽  
Brian O'Donoghue ◽  
Elizabeth Hughes ◽  
Melissa Graham ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ensuring young people experience good sexual health is a key public health concern. Yet, some vulnerable groups of young people are at higher risk of poor sexual health, and consequently require additional support to achieve good sexual health. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to identify and assess the evidence base for behavioural and psychosocial interventions to improve sexual health for young people with additional vulnerabilities.Methods We searched for randomised controlled trials of interventions aimed at promoting sexual health, with any non-pharmacological comparator (e.g., waitlist control). Key outcomes of interest were indicators of sexual health (e.g., condom use, attitudes to contraception, knowledge of risk). Participants in eligible trials were under 25 years old and in a high-risk group (alcohol and other drug use; justice-involved; homeless; LGBTQI+; mental ill-health; ethnic minority, or out-of-home care). The final literature searches were performed on 16 September 2020, on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus and clinical trial registries. Meta-analyses were conducted where possible.Results Forty-seven papers from 46 trials of the 5213 identified met inclusion criteria, with all but one of the included trials conducted in North America. Three focused predominantly on AOD, six on juvenile justice, two on homelessness, five on young men who have sex with men (YMSM), 26 on ethnic minorities, two on mental ill-health, three on out-of-home care, however no trials were identified in LGBTQI + groups outside of YMSM. The 47 included papers had a combined total of 21,543 participants. The vast majority (26/46) of trials were conducted with ethnic minority groups, with most of the interventions delivered as group therapy, and some involving parents and caregivers. Condom use was the most frequently reported outcome measure. In trials targeting ethnic minorities, the meta-analysis found a medium effect size (0.62, p = 0.0004) of the intervention on condom use.Conclusions There remains a dearth of research undertaken outside of North America, and in high-risk groups other than ethnic minorities. Future interventions should address sexual health more broadly than just the absence of negative biological outcomes with LGBTQI+, homeless and mental ill-health populations targeted for such work.This review was registered at Prospero (ref. 149810) and at osf.io/ukva9.


Author(s):  
Sadia Ilyas ◽  
Stanislav Henkin ◽  
Pablo Martinez‐Camblor ◽  
Bjoern D. Suckow ◽  
Jocelyn M. Beach ◽  
...  

Background Patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 have an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Whether sex, race or ethnicity impacts these events is unknown. We studied the association between sex, race, and ethnicity and venous and arterial thromboembolic events among adults hospitalized with COVID‐19. Methods and Results We used the American Heart Association Cardiovascular Disease COVID‐19 registry. Primary exposures were sex and race and ethnicity, as defined by the registry. Primary outcomes were venous thromboembolic events and arterial thromboembolic events. We used logistic regression for risk adjustment. We studied 21 528 adults hospitalized with COVID‐19 across 107 centers (54.1% men; 38.1% non‐Hispanic White, 25.4% Hispanic, 25.7% non‐Hispanic Black, 0.5% Native American, 4.0% Asian, 0.4% Pacific Islander, and 5.9% other race and ethnicity). The rate of venous thromboembolic events was 3.7% and was more common in men (4.2%) than women (3.2%; P <0.001), and in non‐Hispanic Black patients (4.9%) than other races and ethnicities (range, 1.3%–3.8%; P <0.001). The rate of arterial thromboembolic events was 3.9% and was more common in men (4.3%) than women (3.5%; P =0.002), and in non‐Hispanic Black patients (5.0%) than other races and ethnicities (range, 2.3%–4.7%; P <0.001). Compared with men, women were less likely to experience venous thromboembolic events (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.83) and arterial thromboembolic events (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66–0.89). Compared with non‐Hispanic White patients, non‐Hispanic Black patients had the highest likelihood of venous thromboembolic events (adjusted OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04–1.54) and arterial thromboembolic events (adjusted OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.11–1.65). Conclusions Men and non‐Hispanic Black adults hospitalized with COVID‐19 are more likely to have venous and arterial thromboembolic events. These subgroups may represent at‐risk patients more susceptible to thromboembolic COVID‐19 complications.


Author(s):  
Rebecca A Snyder ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Syed Nabeel Zafar ◽  
Amanda Francescatti ◽  
George J Chang

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine the association between race and long-term cancer outcomes (recurrence and overall survival) within a population of US patients with locoregional colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods A cohort study of primary patient data merged with the National Cancer Database as part of a Commission on Cancer Special Study was performed. The study population was a random sample of patients undergoing surgery for stage I to III CRC between years 2006 and 2007 with 5 years of follow-up. Propensity-weighted multivariable Cox regression was performed with pooled results to yield statistical inferences. Prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed only for patients who received guideline concordant care (GCC) of primary CRC. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results The study population included 8176 patients, 9.9% (n = 811) Black and 90.1% (n = 7365) White. Black patients were more likely to be uninsured or underinsured, have lower household income, and lower educational status (all P &lt; .001). Rates of GCC were higher among Black vs White patients with colon cancer (76.9% vs 72.6%, P = .02), and Black and White patients with rectal cancer were treated with radiation at similar rates (69.1% vs 66.6%, P = .64). Black race was independently associated with increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 1.73) and mortality (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.59). In sensitivity analysis of only patients who received GCC, observed effects for recurrence (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.79) and overall survival (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.66) persisted. Conclusions Despite higher rates of GCC for CRC, Black patients experience a higher risk of recurrence and mortality compared with White patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5571-5571
Author(s):  
Camilla Dagum ◽  
Nicole Vilardo ◽  
Gregory M. Gressel

5571 Background: Racial disparities in uterine cancer outcomes are present, as Black patients with uterine cancer have markedly higher mortality when compared with White patients. Potential etiologies of this discrepancy have been investigated, including implicit bias, histopathologic factors and stage at presentation, molecular and genetic factors, and socioeconomic factors. The purpose of this study is to explore if non-White patients with uterine cancer are more likely to experience distant cancer recurrence compared to White patients. Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study was performed examining all patients diagnosed with uterine cancer from 2006-2016. Data regarding patient demographics, medical co-morbidities, histology, stage, treatment course, and disease recurrence were abstracted from the medical record. Race was categorized based on how a patient was registered in the medical record. The primary outcome was location of recurrence, with local recurrence defined as vaginal/cuff recurrence and distant recurrence representing nodal, intraperitoneal, or distant recurrence. A multivariable regression model was built in a backwards stepwise fashion to examine the association of individual covariates with distant recurrence as opposed to vaginal recurrence. Results: A total of 1205 patients with uterine cancer were included for analysis. Three hundred eighteen (26.5%) patients were White, 472 (39.2%) Black, 319 (26.5%) Hispanic, 91 (7.6%) Asian, and 4 (0.3%) other. A total of 223 (18.5%) patients experienced disease recurrence. Black women experienced a statistically significant increased risk of recurrence compared with non-Black women [OR 1.99 (95% CI 1.37-2.88), p < 0.01]. Additionally, Black patients were significantly more likely to experience nodal, intra-peritoneal and distant recurrences relative to White patients (p < 0.01). When adjusting for covariates including race, histology, grade, stage and adjuvant treatment, non-White race [OR 3.87 (95% CI (1.42-10.54), p < 0.01] was associated with significant increase in risk of distal recurrence. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that non-White race is potentially contributory to distant recurrence of uterine cancer, even when accounting for histopathologic differences, stage at presentation, and other traditional covariates. These findings suggest that the disparate outcomes experienced by non-White patients are likely multi-factorial in nature and highlight the need for efforts focused on optimizing treatment and improving outcomes of non-White women with uterine cancer.[Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (33) ◽  
pp. 5559-5564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Trice Loggers ◽  
Paul K. Maciejewski ◽  
Elizabeth Paulk ◽  
Susan DeSanto-Madeya ◽  
Matthew Nilsson ◽  
...  

Purpose Black patients are more likely than white patients to receive life-prolonging care near death. This study examined predictors of intensive end-of-life (EOL) care for black and white advanced cancer patients. Patients and Methods Three hundred two self-reported black (n = 68) and white (n = 234) patients with stage IV cancer and caregivers participated in a US multisite, prospective, interview-based cohort study from September 2002 to August 2008. Participants were observed until death, a median of 116 days from baseline. Patient-reported baseline predictors included EOL care preference, physician trust, EOL discussion, completion of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, and religious coping. Caregiver postmortem interviews provided information regarding EOL care received. Intensive EOL care was defined as resuscitation and/or ventilation followed by death in an intensive care unit. Results Although black patients were three times more likely than white patients to receive intensive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.04, P = .037), white patients with a preference for this care were approximately three times more likely to receive it (aOR = 13.20, P = .008) than black patients with the same preference (aOR = 4.46, P = .058). White patients who reported an EOL discussion or DNR order did not receive intensive EOL care; similar reports were not protective for black patients (aOR = 0.53, P = .460; and aOR = 0.65, P = .618, respectively). Conclusion White patients with advanced cancer are more likely than black patients with advanced cancer to receive the EOL care they initially prefer. EOL discussions and DNR orders are not associated with care for black patients, highlighting a need to improve communication between black patients and their clinicians.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document