scholarly journals Who are the young users of tobacco products? Prevalence and characteristics of Danish adolescents who have either smoked cigarettes, used alternative tobacco products, or used both

2021 ◽  
pp. 145507252110276
Author(s):  
Simone Gad Kjeld ◽  
Susan Andersen ◽  
Anette Andersen ◽  
Stine Glenstrup ◽  
Lisbeth Lund ◽  
...  

Aims: We examined characteristics (smoking in social relations, binge drinking, and well-being measures) of Danish 13-year-olds in relation to their tobacco use patterns. Ever use of cigarettes exclusively, ever use of alternative tobacco products (ATPs; e-cigarettes, snus, or waterpipe) exclusively, and use of both cigarettes and ATPs were studied. Methods: We used self-reported data from students at 46 Danish schools in 2017 comprising 2,307 students (response rate = 86%). Multi-level logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between student characteristics and the odds for having ever used any tobacco products, smoked cigarettes exclusively, used ATPs exclusively, or used both cigarettes and ATPs compared with never use of any tobacco products. Unadjusted estimates and estimates adjusted for gender were reported. Results: A significant minority of youth (13.2%) had used one or more tobacco products. Of these, 2.0% had exclusively smoked cigarettes, 7.2% had exclusively used ATPs, and 4.0% had used both. Findings showed that all included characteristics (families’ and friends’ smoking, binge drinking, and well-being characteristics) were associated with using any tobacco product; however, students with friends who smoked, had been binge drinking, and had low well-being at home had notably higher odds for having both smoked cigarettes and used ATPs compared to the other tobacco use patterns. Conclusion: ATPs were popular among Danish adolescents compared with conventional cigarettes. Thus, prevention efforts among adolescents should not merely focus on the health risks of conventional cigarette smoking but also on ATPs. Students with diverse tobacco use patterns were similar on various characteristics. However, findings indicate that adolescents who had used both conventional cigarettes and ATPs constitute a more risk-averse group in special need of prevention efforts. Gender did not markedly influence the results. These findings may help future strategies aiming at the youngest adolescents at risk of using tobacco products.

Author(s):  
Adriana Pérez ◽  
Arnold E. Kuk ◽  
Meagan A. Bluestein ◽  
Hui Min Shirlyn Sia ◽  
Baojiang Chen

Earlier exposure to binge drinking and tobacco use is associated with higher odds of substance use disorders. Using national youth data from the PATH study, we prospectively estimate the age of initiating past 30-day use of (1) cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and binge drinking, and (2) cigarettes, cigarillos, and binge drinking. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate differences in the age of initiation by sex, race/ethnicity, and previous use of other tobacco products. By age 21, 4.4% (95% CI: 3.7–5.2) and 2.0% (95% CI: 1.2–2.8) of youth reported initiation of past 30-day use outcomes (1) and (2), respectively. After controlling for sex and previous use of other tobacco products, statistically significant differences in the age of initiation by race/ethnicity were found for each outcome: Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black youth were less likely than non-Hispanic White youth to initiate past 30-day use of both outcomes (1) and (2) at earlier ages. Although the initiation of both outcomes remained relatively low by age 21, these incidences represent 1.56 million and 700,000 youth, respectively. This study provides the public with evidence to identify the particular ages at which education campaigns may be most effective to prevent youth from initiating these three substances. Further research is needed to estimate the age of initiation of other dual tobacco use patterns with binge drinking.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Wang ◽  
Jianjiu Chen ◽  
Lok Tung Leung ◽  
Sai Yin Ho ◽  
Tai Hing Lam ◽  
...  

Abstract Smoking is a major cause of health inequities. However, sociodemographic differences in adolescent tobacco use are unclear, especially for new tobacco products. We investigated tobacco use patterns and sociodemographic correlates in Hong Kong adolescents. In a territory-wide school-based survey, 33 991 students (US grade 7–12) completed an anonymous questionnaire. Tobacco use prevalences and current-ever use ratios by sociodemographic factors were calculated. Generalised linear mixed models were used in association analyses. Current use was highest for cigarettes (3.19%), closely followed by alternative tobacco products (2.96%). Current-ever use ratios were highest for heated tobacco products (HTPs, 0.60), followed by nicotine-containing e-cigarettes (0.52), waterpipe (0.51) and cigarettes (0.35). Student use prevalences and current-ever use ratios of all products showed J-shaped relations with family affluence, being highest in the richest families. Tobacco use was also associated with higher grades, the lowest parental education and boys, but current-ever use ratios of HTP and waterpipe were higher in girls. The results suggested that adolescent ever users of nicotine-containing alternative products were more likely to keep using them than cigarettes, and the richest adolescents were at the highest risks of tobacco use. Diverse tobacco control measures are needed to improve health equity, especially on alternative products.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz María Sánchez-Romero ◽  
Christopher J. Cadham ◽  
Jana L. Hirschtick ◽  
Delvon T. Mattingly ◽  
Beomyoung Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: With the increasing changes in tobacco use patterns, “current use” definition and the survey used may have important implications for monitoring population use trends. Methods: Using three US surveys (2014/15 TUS-CPS, NHIS and PATH), we compared the adult (age 18+) prevalence of four product groups (cigarettes, other combustibles, smokeless tobacco, and e-cigarettes) based on three past 30-day frequency of use thresholds: 1+, 10+, and 25+ days. We also examined mutually exclusive single, dual, and polytobacco users as a percentage of total users for each product group. Results: Regardless of threshold or product, the prevalence was higher in PATH followed by NHIS and TUS-CPS, in some cases by large percentages. The differences in cigarette and smokeless tobacco use prevalence in going from the 1+ to 10+ days and to the 25+ days threshold were minimal. Applying different frequency thresholds had the largest impact on other combustibles prevalence, with a 60% reduction with the 10+ days threshold and a 80% reduction with the 25+ days threshold, compared to the 1+ days threshold, followed by e-cigarettes with 40% and 60% reductions, respectively. The proportion of dual and polytobacco users decreased considerably when using the 10+ vs. the 1+ days threshold and polytobacco use was almost non-existent with the 25+ days threshold. Conclusion: The estimated prevalence of each tobacco product use depends largely on the survey and frequency of use threshold adopted. The choice of survey and frequency threshold merits serious consideration when monitoring patterns of tobacco use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-202
Author(s):  
Augustus M. White ◽  
Deborah J. Ossip ◽  
L. Morgan Snell ◽  
Dongmei Li ◽  
Cosima Hoetger ◽  
...  

Objective: In this paper, we characterize how potential policies restricting access to tobacco products may impact use behaviors among adult, past 30-day, smokers and e-cigarette users. Methods: We conducted an online experiment with 820 smokers, e-cigarette users, and dual users (April 27-June 8, 2020). We randomized participants to one of 4 hypothetical access scenarios: (1) tobacco retail stores open + pharmacies open (TOPO); (2) tobacco stores open but favorite brand unavailable + pharmacies open (TOPO-NFB); (3) tobacco stores closed + pharmacies open (TCPO); and (4) tobacco stores closed + pharmacies closed (TCPC). Outcomes (measured on 0-100 visual analog scales) included the likelihood of quitting, reducing, switching brands or products, and finding another source of tobacco products. Seemingly unrelated regressions tested for associations between access scenarios and prospective tobacco use behaviors. Results: Participants in the TCPO and TOPO-NFB scenarios were more likely to reduce use, switch brands/products, and find another source (ps < .001) than those in the TOPO scenario. Dual and flavored product users were more likely to switch products (ps < .01). Conclusions: When tobacco retailers are closed, tobacco users may be more likely to quit and/or reduce use compared to when retailers are open. However, access restrictions could prompt users to switch tobacco brands/products or sources.


Author(s):  
Mark J.M. Sullman ◽  
Maria-Eugenia Gras ◽  
Antonios Kagialis ◽  
Ioulia Papageorgi ◽  
Sílvia Font-Mayolas

Background: Polytobacco use is common among young adults. The purpose of the present study was to investigate a number of cognitions related to the use of three tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes and waterpipes) among young adults. Methods: Participants (n = 799, 59.4% women) aged 18–25 years old (M = 21.8, SD = 1.7) completed an online tobacco cognitions questionnaire. Results: For all three tobacco products, there was significantly more agreement with the cognition “I would smoke if my best friend offered” among tobacco users (used one or more tobacco products) than among non-users. For e-cigarettes and waterpipes, there was significantly more agreement with the cognition “It would be easy to quit these products” than was reported by non-users. Polytobacco users (three tobacco products) endorsed the cognitions scale (the six cognition items were combined to form a single cognitions scale for each tobacco product) significantly more than non-users for cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Furthermore, waterpipe users, polytobacco users, dual users and single users all endorsed the combined cognitions scales more strongly than non-users. Conclusions: Efforts to prevent polytobacco use should ensure that young adults have the necessary self-efficacy to resist peer pressure and provide them with clear information about the health risks associated with using alternative tobacco products.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. s20-s30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigar Nargis ◽  
Michal Stoklosa ◽  
Jeffrey Drope ◽  
Geoffrey T Fong ◽  
Anne C K Quah ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe price of tobacco products in relation to the income of tobacco users—affordability—is recognised as a key determinant of tobacco use behaviour. The effectiveness of a price increase as a deterrent to tobacco use depends on how much price increases in relation to the income of the potential users. The aim of this paper is to examine the distribution of and trends in the affordability of tobacco products in Bangladesh.MethodUsing four waves of International Tobacco Control Survey data on Bangladesh, this study measures affordability of tobacco products at the individual level as the ratio of self-reported price and self-reported income. The trends in affordability by brand categories of cigarettes and of bidi and smokeless tobacco are estimated using multivariate linear regression analysis.ResultsDespite significant increase in price, the affordability of cigarettes increased between 2009 and 2014–2015 due to income growth outpacing price increase. The increase was disproportionately larger for more expensive brands. The affordability of bidis increased over this period as well. The affordability of smokeless tobacco products remained unchanged between 2011–2012 and 2014–2015.ConclusionThe tax increases that were implemented during 2009–2015 were not enough to increase tobacco product prices sufficiently to outweigh the effect of income growth, and to reduce tobacco consumption. The findings from this research inform policymakers that in countries experiencing rapid economic growth, significant tax increases are needed to counteract the effect of income growth, in order for the tax increases to be effective in reducing tobacco use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Catherine O Egbe ◽  
Charles DH Parry ◽  
Bronwyn Myers

Tobacco use is the single largest preventable cause of death globally. For years, the tobacco industry sought to create a tobacco product that is less controversial than conventional cigarettes. Electronic cigarettes were created out of the supposed need to supply consumers of tobacco products with a less harmful tobacco product. The question remains, is it really less harmful for consumers of traditional cigarettes and other tobacco products to switch to electronic cigarettes? This article takes a closer look at the overall harm in relation to benefits of using electronic cigarettes for the individual and public health and the unintended negative consequences the introduction of electronic cigarette has had on overall public health. Given the evidence that the use of electronic cigarettes is a gateway to the use of other tobacco products especially among adolescents, we view electronic cigarettes as having the potential to cause a rebound of the tobacco use glut which the global public health community has been succeeding in reversing. We therefore support the World Health Organization’s suggestion that electronic cigarettes should be regulated as other tobacco products since there is, as yet, no harmless tobacco product. In the same vein, we view the new Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill seeking to regulate electronic cigarettes in South Africa as other tobacco products as a step in the right direction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-387
Author(s):  
Mamata Pradhan ◽  
Basanti Pokharel ◽  
Anisha Khadgi

Background: Tobacco product are products made entirely or partly of leaf tobacco as raw material, which are intended to be smoked, sucked, chewed, or snuffed. Tobacco use, among the adolescents is a growing public health problem the world has ever faced. More than 7 million deaths occur from tobacco use every day. Literature has shown that the prevalence of the tobacco uses was high among adolescents. Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive study design was used.150 respondents were taken as sample size. Probability sampling technique and self- administered questionnaire modified from GYTS, Version 2011 was used as a research instruments. Analysis was done using SPSSversion 16. Findings: The study revealed that maximum 57.3% were male, majority 71.3% were from nuclear family, more than fifty 62.7% respondent's family uses tobacco products and majority75.8% tobacco is used by the respondent’s father. Majority 73.3% uses the hookah, more than half 64% gets tobacco from shop, and almost half 46.7% initiated tobacco product as experiment/curiosity and majority 74.7% uses in café. There is statically association found on frequency of tobacco used by the respondents with sex, residence of the respondent, time spend by the parents and initiated age of the tobacco. Greater strength of association on sex and initiated age of the tobacco use where lower strength of association on residence of the respondents and time spend by family. Conclusion: About 15-20% of each higher secondary school students involve on the use of tobacco products. Gender, living place, time spend by the parents, initiated age of tobacco use, increase café cultural, easy availability and accessibility were the common factors for the use of tobacco among higher secondary students. So buying and selling tobacco products everywhere must be prohibited and adolescents should be restricted to use tobacco products in café or public places. Key words: Tobacco, Higher Secondary Students, Factors.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Cheng ◽  
Pavel N. Lizhnyak ◽  
Natasha A. Knight ◽  
Andrea R. Vansickel ◽  
Edward G. Largo

Importance: Susceptibility to tobacco use can help identify youth that are at risk for tobacco use. Objective: To estimate the extent of overlap in susceptibilities across various tobacco products, investigate correlates with susceptibilities, and examine whether the relationship linking susceptibility with the onset of use is product specific or is accounted for by a general susceptibility-onset relationship. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Analysis of data from the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study wave 4 (December 2016 to January 2018) and wave 4.5 youth surveys (December 2017 to November 2018). Participants: A nationally representative sample of non-institutionalized youth 12-17 years old who had never used a tobacco product at baseline assessment. Main variable of interest: Susceptibility to the use of each type of tobacco product assessed at wave 4. Main outcomes: Onset of use of various tobacco products defined as the first use occurring between waves 4 and 4.5 assessments. Results: Cigarettes and e-cigarettes were the most common (~25%), while snus was the least common (<5%), tobacco product to which youth were susceptible. There was a high degree of overlap in susceptibilities across tobacco products (65% of tobacco-susceptible youth were susceptible to more than one tobacco product). Tobacco-susceptible youth were more likely to have used cannabis or consumed alcohol in the past 30 days or to have tobacco-using peers. Susceptibility to use predicted the onset of use (incidence ratio = 3.2 to 12.9). Estimates for the product-specific path were null, except for e-cigarettes (β=0.08, 95% CI=0.04 to 0.13) and filtered cigars (β= -0.09, 95% CI= -0.13 to -0.05), after accounting for the general susceptibility-to-tobacco-onset relationship (β=0.50, 95% CI=0.42 to 0.58). Conclusions and Relevance: Youth susceptibility to tobacco use overlaps widely across different tobacco products and other risky behaviors. Public health efforts may benefit from a holistic approach to risk behavior prevention planning.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Delvon T Mattingly ◽  
Lindsay K Tompkins ◽  
Clara G Sears ◽  
Kandi L Walker ◽  
Joy L Hart

Introduction: In Appalachia, youth tobacco use rates exceed the national average, and youth in these rural areas are increasingly aware of new and emerging tobacco products, such as e-cigarettes. Given that e-cigarettes are a commonly used tobacco product by youth, additional inquiry is needed to better understand both youth product perceptions and use patterns, especially in communities with entrenched acceptance of tobacco. Study Aim and Hypothesis: Our aim is to examine the prevalence of conventional tobacco and e-cigarette use among Appalachian youth and to examine associations between use and tobacco harm perceptions. We hypothesized that conventional tobacco users would be less likely than non-users to perceive e-cigarette use as harmful and that e-cigarette users would be less likely than non-users to perceive e-cigarette use as harmful. Methods: A survey of middle and high school students (n=1,008) was conducted in rural Appalachia. The primary outcome in this analysis, tobacco use, was categorized as never user, conventional tobacco only user (cigarettes or smokeless), or e-cigarette only user. Descriptive characteristics were compared among the three use groups. Relationships between harm perceptions and tobacco product use were assessed using multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for age, race, gender, and grade level. Results: Nearly one-fourth (23%) of the participants had tried e-cigarettes. Compared to never users, conventional users were more likely to indicate that e-cigarettes did not cause: (1) health problems (OR: 1.65; CI: 1.075-2.521) or (2) addiction (OR: 1.63; CI: 1.064-2.496). Youth who indicated e-cigarettes do not cause health problems were more likely to be e-cigarette users than non-e-cigarette users (OR: 2.04, CI: 1.460-2.838), and youth who indicated smoking does not cause addiction were more likely to be conventional users than never or e-cigarette only users (OR: 1.96; CI: 1.181-3.262). Conclusions: In summary, youth who use conventional tobacco products or e-cigarettes are less likely to perceive e-cigarettes as harmful. These findings reinforce the need for vigilance in restricting youth access to tobacco products, increased emphasis on health campaigns that clarify scientific uncertainty surrounding tobacco safety, and regulation of e-cigarette marketing that targets youth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document