Celebrating the chameleon educational policy reforms of 2050

2021 ◽  
pp. 147821032110403
Author(s):  
Jennifer Clutterbuck
Keyword(s):  
Educational Policy ◽  
Global Education ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Economic Cost ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Policy Reforms ◽  
25Th Anniversary ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Educational Engagement ◽  
The Right

The Chameleon Educational Policy Reforms’ (CEPR) 25th anniversary was celebrated at the Global General Assembly with the 2075 Decennial Analysis of Schooling (DecAS) announcement of the attainment of a benefit-cost ratio of >1.0. The attainment of a global positive net value of education is directly linked to the educational reforms established to ‘provide the right access to the right education for all people’ (CEPR, 2050). The Chameleon reforms, informed by The Algorithm, produce policies that instantly adapt to the learning environment and needs of students. Barriers that effect students’ learning are removed, in stark contrast to historic processes that viewed students as the barrier to be removed from learning environments. The case studies presented in this paper are guided by three questions: ‘Where are we now?’, ‘How did we get here?’, and ‘Are we there yet?’. Questioning the ‘here and now’, directs a look back from educational engagement currently governed by the CEPR to key moments and movements in the attainment of past grand policy announcements that no child be left behind to live in poverty. And ‘yet’, leads to critical consideration of the ongoing engagement with The Algorithm. Artifacts detailing the 2045 commencement of annual donations from the richest two percent to fully fund global education remain sealed. The results of the annual donations are, however, publicly available; and some would say exploited (Gerve, 2072). Achieving self-sustainable economic cost-benefit status for the CEPR may release the Donators from those agreements and untether society from the Donators.

Social and economic cost-benefit analysis of sanitation in Odisha State, India

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan A. Cronin ◽  
Makito Ohikata ◽  
Manish Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
State Level ◽  
Economic Cost ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Open Defecation ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
The Social ◽  
Benefit Cost

This study estimates the social and economic impact of achieving full sanitation in Odisha State, the first time such a study has been conducted at a sub-national (entire State) level in India. The economic costs and associated social benefits to society via the elimination of open defecation by 2025 are estimated and compared to progress at the current pace. The findings show that net benefits of sanitation conservatively amount to at least 1.6% State GDP (range 0.4 to 2.7% under varying growth and discount rates). The benefit-cost ratio is estimated at 5.7 (range 3.1 to 7.7). These results provide strong evidence to planners and decision-makers that sanitation gives significant returns, both social and economic, on investment and gives ample evidence for the acceleration of the elimination of open defecation.

scholarly journals Efficiency Comparison between Conventional and Modern Port Operation System for Small-Scale Dry Bulk Cargo

2018 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 05004
Author(s):  
Aulia Tiara ◽  
Julfikhsan Ahmad Mukhti
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Cost ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Operation System ◽  
Financial Assessment ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Port Operation ◽  
Efficiency Comparison ◽  
Efficient Option ◽  
The Right

Since the launching of Sea Toll Road Program in 2015, the improvement in ports’ operation systems has become Indonesia’s foremost necessity. This improvement commonly leads to equipment modernization, while realistically, modern equipment does not always amount to a productive performance, especially in the context of small-scale ports. Instead, it is prone to creating wasteful capital and maintenance cost as well as making the planning time ineffective. This study compares two options of port operation systems in a small port, which is conventional and technologically-advanced method for dry bulk cargo. It results in thin gaps between each option’s financial assessment variables, which are Internal Rate of Return, Benefit/Cost Ratio and Payback Period, regardless of a stark difference between each option’s equipment cost. This study concludes that with the right approach, the conventional operation system is still the most efficient option compared to its contemporary opposite.

scholarly journals Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacist interventions over 36 months in a university hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Maurilio de Souza Cazarim ◽  
João Paulo Vilela Rodrigues ◽  
Priscila Santos Calcini ◽  
Thomas Einarson ◽  
Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Cost ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Hospital Perspective ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Tertiary Teaching

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-benefits analysis of a clinical pharmacy (CP) service implemented in a Neurology ward of a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: This is a cost-benefit analysis of a single arm, prospective cohort study performed at the adult Neurology Unit over 36 months, which has evaluated the results of a CP service from a hospital and Public Health System (PHS) perspective. The interventions were classified into 14 categories and the costs identified as direct medical costs. The results were analyzed by the total and marginal cost, the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and the net benefit (NB). RESULTS: The total 334 patients were followed-up and the highest occurrence in 506 interventions was drug introduction (29.0%). The marginal cost for the hospital and avoided cost for PHS was US$182±32 and US$25,536±4,923 per year; and US$0.55 and US$76.4 per patient/year. The BCR and NB were 0.0, -US$26,105 (95%CI -31,850 – -10,610), -US$27,112 (95%CI -33,160–11,720) for the hospital and; 3.0 (95%CI 1.97–4.94), US$51,048 (95%CI 27,645–75,716) and, 4.6 (95%CI 2.24–10.05), US$91,496 (95%CI 34,700–168,050; p < 0.001) for the PHS, both considering adhered and total interventions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CP service was not directly cost-benefit at the hospital perspective, but it presented savings for forecast cost related to the occurrence of preventable morbidities, measuring a good cost-benefit for the PHS.

Performance Measurement in Social Enterprises

2019 ◽  
pp. 205-231
Author(s):  
Ayla Zehra Öncer
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Impact Measurement ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Cost

This chapter begins with the notion of performance management and then focuses on the concept of social impact in order to deeply examine the measurement of performance in social enterprises. The chapter argues the importance of measuring social impact which is the crucial process in social investment and discusses which measurement method to choose. It then introduces the classification of methods in various forms based on the related literature. The chapter continues by explaining the most frequently used social impact measurement methods including cost effectiveness and cost benefit analyses, social accounting and auditing, SROI, balanced scorecard, SIMPLE, benefit-cost ratio, BACO ratio, expected return metric, cost per impact, and blended value. Finally, the conclusion focuses on the overall perspective of the subject, critical areas to pay attention to, and limitations.

scholarly journals Guide to cost benefit analysis of community-based interventions

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Sanni Yaya ◽  
Xiaonan Li
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Community Based Interventions ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
The Cost

This paper offers a general guide on how to conduct a proper economic analysis for community-based intervention projects. Identification and quantification of costs and benefits are the focus of the cost benefit analysis. We categorize costs and benefits from human and physical perspectives and pay special attention to the measures of saving human lives accompanied by the proposed calculation methods. We recommend net present value and benefit-cost ratio as the criteria to assess projects and highlight some challenges remaining in the analysis.

Efficient two-stage sequential arrays of proof of concept studies for pharmaceutical portfolios

2020 ◽  
pp. 096228022095817
Author(s):  
Linchen He ◽  
Linqiu Du ◽  
Zoran Antonijevic ◽  
Martin Posch ◽  
Valeriy R Korostyshevskiy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Benefit Cost

Previous work has shown that individual randomized “proof-of-concept” (PoC) studies may be designed to maximize cost-effectiveness, subject to an overall PoC budget constraint. Maximizing cost-effectiveness has also been considered for arrays of simultaneously executed PoC studies. Defining Type III error as the opportunity cost of not performing a PoC study, we evaluate the common pharmaceutical practice of allocating PoC study funds in two stages. Stage 1, or the first wave of PoC studies, screens drugs to identify those to be permitted additional PoC studies in Stage 2. We investigate if this strategy significantly improves efficiency, despite slowing development. We quantify the benefit, cost, benefit-cost ratio, and Type III error given the number of Stage 1 PoC studies. Relative to a single stage PoC strategy, significant cost-effective gains are seen when at least one of the drugs has a low probability of success (10%) and especially when there are either few drugs (2) with a large number of indications allowed per drug (10) or a large portfolio of drugs (4). In these cases, the recommended number of Stage 1 PoC studies ranges from 2 to 4, tracking approximately with an inflection point in the minimization curve of Type III error.

Results from Phase I of a Pilot Study on Dynamic Ramp Metering in Houston

2020 ◽  
Vol 2674 (11) ◽  
pp. 478-489
Author(s):  
Hongmin “Tracy” Zhou ◽  
Magdy Kozman
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Ramp Metering ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
The Past ◽  
Texas Department ◽  
The Right ◽  
Benefit Cost

Traffic in Houston, U.S., has continued growing over the past decade. The Houston District of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) recently began a pilot study to evaluate a dynamic ramp metering system. The project is aimed to convert ramp metering from local control to system-wide dynamic operation. In Phase I of the project, major control parameters and different metering strategies were tested and evaluated in simulation and field settings for a study corridor installed with six ramp meters. The study identified a base metering plan that overall worked well for sites without restrictive queue conditions. This base plan was that average speed of 50 mph or lower in the right-most two mainlanes will call for metering at a constant metering rate of 850 vehicles per hour for at least 4 min, and that queue occupancy of 50% or higher will call for meter shutdown for at least 1 min. Ramp metering coordinated with the downstream intersection performed well by accommodating diverted traffic caused by ramp metering. When operating ramp meters in a group, metering the immediately upstream meter performed best compared with metering further upstream meters. It is evident that ramp metering caused traffic diversion to the frontage road and also caused reduced queue-jumping behaviors on the frontage road at ramp meters with an immediately upstream exit ramp. The coordinated ramp metering strategy can potentially generate a benefit/cost ratio of 117:1 compared with local metering in the District.

Preliminary Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) for Safety Assist Technologies in ASEAN NCAP – Rationalizing the Impact to Road Safety for Malaysia’s Case

2014 ◽  
Vol 663 ◽  
pp. 596-603
Author(s):  
Zulhaidi Mohd Jawi ◽  
Aqbal Hafeez Ariffin ◽  
Yahaya Ahmad ◽  
Khairil Anwar Abu Kassim ◽  
Norlen Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Road Safety ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Rating Scheme

The newly established New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asian Countries (ASEAN NCAP) has incorporated Safety Assist Technologies (SATs) in its automobile safety rating scheme. In order for any assessed car to be eligible for the maximum 5-star rating, it should first be equipped with Electronic Stability Control (ESC) and fitted with seatbelt reminder (SBR). However, since these SATs are not being evaluated in their performance by the means of field testing, this paper explains the benefit of having these SATs through Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) which help to rationalize the importance of SATs in preventing road accidents or mitigating severity of injuries. Due to data limitation, this preliminary CBA assessment will only be focusing on Malaysia’s situation and is based on published sources and the authors’ best estimates. This study also includes the Cost-Benefit Analysis on Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which is the basis for ESC technology, in preparation for its inclusion in the future rating scheme to expedite the vision of making ABS as standard fit in all ASEAN’s passenger cars. The preliminary result shows that all technologies – ESC, SBR and ABS – appear to be cost-effective (benefit/cost-ratio > 3) or most likely cost effective (1 < benefit/cost-ratio < 3) in Malaysia’s road safety situation per se.

scholarly journals Analysis of Benefit Cost Ratio of Sesame Production under Demonstration in Low Lands of Western Zone, Tigray, Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tewoderos Meleaku ◽  
Desaly Gebre Tshadike ◽  
Goteom Zenbe
Keyword(s):  
Production Cost ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Western Zone ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Seed Data ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Benefit Cost

This study aimed to investigate the cost-benefit of sesame production per hectare under (farmers practice, partial package and full package) practice were farmers performed side by side in their plot. Benefit cost ratio analyses of sesame was conducted in western low lands of Tigray. It includes the production year of 2016/17 E.C and bounded of two woredas with six production sites. In the present study 40 respondents of sesame producers were incorporated. Producers were categorized in to full package (row planting, fertilizer and improved seed users), partial package (broadcast, fertilizer and improved seed users) and non package (broad cast and improved seed). Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16 in terms of percentage, mean, model and others. On the other hand, per hectare yield, return, production cost, and benefit cost ratio of each package were statistically different. The mean productivity per hectare for full package, partial package and non package was 6.55, 5.26 and 3.85 quintal sequentially. The mean return per hectare of full package, partial package, and non package was 26243.75, 21746.25 and 13178.91 birr sequentially. The production cost per hectare of full package, partial package, and non package was 13826.74, 12561.35 and 8681.46 birr respectively. The mean benefit cost ratio was 1.90, 1.74 and 1.50 birr respectively for full package, partial package and non package.

scholarly journals Kajian Ekonomis PLT-Angin dan PLTS untuk Penerangan Jalan Umum (PJU)

ELKHA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Erick Radwitya ◽  
Akhdiyatul Akhdiyatul
Keyword(s):  
Solar Cell ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Break Even Point ◽  
Benefit Cost

Abstract–              Kabupaten Ketapang merupakan Kabupaten terluas, memiliki pantai yang memanjang dari selatan ke utara dan sebagian besar penduduk tinggal di pesisir pantai, dengan kecepatan angin rata-rata adalah 5,1 m/s dan persentase penyinaran matahari 70% merupakan yang tertinggi di Kalimantan Barat. Jika dilihat dari letak dan iklim, untuk memenuhi kebutuhan energi listrik dalam memenuhi kebebutuhan PJU di Kabupaten Ketapang. Salah satu solusi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan energi yang diperlukan PJU adalah Energi Angin dan Energi Surya. Guna mengoptimalkan potensi energi terbarukan yaitu energi angin dan energi surya yang ada di Kabupaten Ketapang untuk kebutuhan PJU maka perlu suatu Kajian Ekonomis Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Angin Stand Alone dan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya Stand Alone untuk PJU. Analisis ekonomi adalah suatu analisis untuk mengetahui layak tidaknya suatu kegiatan untuk dilaksanakan dan titik beratnya pada hasil total, produktivitas dan keuntungan. Dalam analisis finansial ini biasanya digunakan Cost Benefit Analisys, Capital Recovery, Payback of Period, Break Even Point dan Benefit Cost Ratio. Hasil yang diperoleh dari kajian ini, untuk PLT Angin AWI-E500T biaya investasi awal senilai Rp. 41.688.350 dengan kapasitas produksi 723 kWh per tahun dan biaya investasi awal untuk PLTS Solar Cell senilai Rp. 18.625.800 dengan kapasitas produksi 204,4 kWh per tahun. Dari analisis ekonomi dengan menggunakan metode BCR, hasil nilai Benefit Cost Ratio untuk PLT Angin AWI E500T dan PLTS Solar Cell lebih besar dari 1 (BCR ≥ 1), ini berarti investasi  layak (feasible) untuk dilaksanakan. Keywords–PLT-Angin Stand Alone, PLTS Solar Cell Stand Alone, Penerangan Jalan Umum (PJU), dan Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document