Management of Hypertension in Solid-Organ Transplantation

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong M. Park ◽  
Fu L. Luan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Antihypertensive Regimen ◽  
Optimal Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Range ◽  
The Individual

Posttransplant hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic renal allograft dysfunction. A significant number of transplant recipients suffer from posttransplant hypertension in part because of corticosteroid and calcineurin inhibitor use. Although the optimal blood pressure range and the antihypertensive agents of choice in the transplant population have not been determined, the guidelines for blood pressure control in the general population can be extrapolated to the transplant population. The choice of an antihypertensive regimen should be tailored on the basis of the individual patient's risk factors and comorbidities.

Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Clinical Updates, Challenges and Future Directions

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3497-3506
Author(s):  
Raymund R. Razonable
Keyword(s):  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus is the classic opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation. This review will discuss updates and future directions in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention, but they should not be mutually exclusive and each strategy should be considered depending on a specific situation. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is emphasized as a major factor that should pave the way for an individualized approach to prevention. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management, and strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are enumerated. There is increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, and their potential role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts is discussed.

scholarly journals Comparison of Three Cellular Assays to Predict the Course of CMV Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Smaranda Gliga ◽  
Melanie Fiedler ◽  
Theresa Dornieden ◽  
Anne Achterfeld ◽  
Andreas Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Cellular Assays ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Ifn Γ ◽  
Liver Transplant Recipients

To estimate protection from cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication after solid organ transplantation, CMV serology has been considered insufficient and thus CMV immunity is increasingly assessed by cellular in vitro methods. We compared two commercially available IFN-γ ELISpot assays (T-Track CMV and T-SPOT.CMV) and an IFN-γ ELISA (QuantiFERON-CMV). Currently, there is no study comparing these three assays. The assays were performed in 56 liver transplant recipients at the end of antiviral prophylaxis and one month thereafter. In CMV high- or intermediate-risk patients the two ELISpot assays showed significant correlation (p < 0.0001, r > 0.6) but the correlation of the ELISpot assays with QuantiFERON-CMV was weaker. Results of both ELISpot assays were similarly predictive of protection from CMV-DNAemia ≥500 copies/mL [CMV pp65 T-SPOT.CMV at the end of prophylaxis: area under curve (AUC) = 0.744, cut-off 142 spot forming units (SFU), sensitivity set to 100%, specificity 46%; CMV IE-1 T-Track CMV at month 1: AUC = 0.762, cut-off 3.5 SFU, sensitivity set to 100%, specificity 59%]. The QuantiFERON-CMV assay was inferior, reaching a specificity of 23% when setting the sensitivity to 100%. In conclusion, both CMV-specific ELISpot assays appear suitable to assess protection from CMV infection/reactivation in liver transplant recipients.

scholarly journals Optimal blood pressure for patients with chronic kidney disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Bin Lee ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
So-hyeon Hong ◽  
Jung A. Kim ◽  
Eun Roh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Antihypertensive Treatment ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Optimal Blood Pressure ◽  
Stage Renal Disease

AbstractThe effect of blood pressure (BP) on the incident cardiovascular events, progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality were evaluated among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with and without antihypertensive treatment. This nationwide study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort data. The hazards of outcomes were analysed according to the systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) among adults (aged ≥ 40 years) with CKD and without previous cardiovascular disease or ESRD (n = 22,278). The SBP and DBP were ≥ 130 mmHg and ≥ 80 mmHg in 10,809 (48.52%) and 11,583 (51.99%) participants, respectively. During a median 6.2 years, 1271 cardiovascular events, 201 ESRD incidents, and 1061 deaths were noted. Individuals with SBP ≥ 130 mmHg and DBP ≥ 80 mmHg had higher hazards of hypertension-related adverse outcomes compared to the references (SBP 120–129 mmHg and DBP 70–79 mmHg). SBP < 100 mmHg was associated with hazards of all-cause death, and composite of ESRD and all-cause death during follow-up only among the antihypertensive medication users suggesting that the BP should be < 130/80 mmHg and the SBP should not be < 100 mmHg with antihypertensive agents to prevent the adverse outcome risk of insufficient and excessive antihypertensive treatment in CKD patients.

A systematic review of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after lung transplant.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19046-e19046
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Fnu Kiran ◽  
Hasan Mehmood Mirza ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymphoproliferative Disorder ◽  
Lung Transplant ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Lung Transplant Recipients

e19046 Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication after solid organ transplantation. This study aims to explore the association of PTLD diagnosed after lung transplant with infectious agents and immunosuppression regimen, explore types of PTLD, and their outcome. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we searched the literature on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. 1741 articles were screened and included five studies. Results: We analyzed data from five studies, n=13,643 transplant recipients with n=287 (2.10%) developed PTLD. Four studies showed that 32/63 (51%) PTLD patients were male and 31 (49%) were female. Three studies reported 53/55 (96.4%) patients were EBV positive at PTLD diagnosis. Courtwright. et al, reported that 217/224 (97%) PTLD was associated with either EBV positive donor or recipient. Four studies showed that the monomorphic B cell type 48/63 (76%) was the most common histological type of PTLD diagnosed with DLBCL the most common subtype 31/48 (64.6%). Data from 3 studies showed that the onset of PTLD following lung transplant varies with a median duration of 18.3 months (45 days to 20.2 years). Three studies showed that 26/55 (47.3%) patients had early-onset (≤ 1 yr of Tx) and 29/55 (52.7%) patients had late-onset PTLD (> 1 yr of Tx). Management of PTLD included a reduction in immunosuppression including corticosteroids, CNI, purine synthesis inhibitors, Rituximab, and chemotherapeutic agents. Three studies showed a mortality rate of 30/45 (66.7%) and 13/30 (43.3%) deaths were PTLD related. Conclusions: Our review concludes that PTLD is a serious complication, only 2% of lung transplant recipients developed PTLD. EBV seropositivity is the most factor associated with PTLD diagnosis. Monomorphic PTLD was reported as the most common type in the adult population and no association between gender and PTLD was found. The analysis shows that there is a slightly lower incidence of early (≤ 1 yr of Tx) than late-onset (> 1 yr of Tx) PTLD. Table 1 PTLD after a Lung transplant in adults - a review. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Blood Pressure Control: Stroke and Stroke Prevention

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S8-S11
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Diener
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Pressure Lowering ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for primary and secondary stroke prevention. All antihypertensive drugs are effective in primary prevention: the risk reduction for stroke is 30—42%. However, not all classes of drugs have the same effects: there is some indication that angiotensin receptor blockers may be superior to other classes of antihypertensive drugs in stroke prevention. Seventy-five percent of patients who present to hospital with acute stroke have elevated blood pressure within the first 24—48 hours. Extremes of systolic blood pressure (SBP) increase the risk of death or dependency. The aim of treatment should be to achieve and maintain the SBP in the range 140—160 mmHg. However, fast and drastic blood pressure lowering can have adverse consequences. The PROGRESS trial of secondary prevention with perindopril + indapamide versus placebo + placebo showed a decrease in numbers of stroke recurrences in patients given both active antihypertensive agents, more impressive for cerebral haemorrhage.There were also indications that active treatment might decrease the development of post-stroke dementia.

scholarly journals Viral Enteritis in Solid-Organ Transplantation

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2019
Author(s):  
Anum Abbas ◽  
Andrea J. Zimmer ◽  
Diana Florescu
Keyword(s):  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Organ Transplant Recipients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Viral Enteritis ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for infections due to chronic immunosuppression. Diarrhea is a commonly encountered problem post transplantation, with infectious causes of diarrhea being a frequent complication. Viral infections/enteritides in solid organ transplant recipients often result from frequently encountered pathogens in this population such as cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, and norovirus. However, several emerging viral pathogens are increasingly being recognized as more sensitive diagnostic techniques become available. Treatment is often limited to supportive care and reduction in immunosuppression, though antiviral therapies mayplay a role in the treatment in certain diseases. Viral enteritis is an important entity that contributes to morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients.

scholarly journals The first Russian national multicenter study - ROBLS (Russian Optimal Blood pressure Lowering Study)

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 151-154
Author(s):  
Yu. N. Belenkov ◽  
I. Ye. Chazova
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Routine Treatment ◽  
Optimal Blood Pressure

ROBIS is the first large multicenter study performed in Russia. The Objective of the study was to compare the efficiency, safely, and impact of two treatment policies (the application of an algorithm to the stepwise use of 4 classes of antihypertensive agents in an intensive care group and random antihypertensive therapy in a routine treatment group) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with arterial hypertension. Design: This is a national multicenter open consecutive prospective study. The patients meeting the criteria of inclusion were randomly divided into two equal groups, one of them (an intensive care group) received therapy with a nifedipine retard in Fixed dose for 4 weeks. In patients who failed to achieve the target level of blood pressure (BP), the therapy was supplemented by enalapril, 20 mg, hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg, and metoprolol, 50 mg, at a 4-week interval. After achieving the target BP level, the patients continued the treatment with which the level had been attained. If the antihypertensive effect of therapy was found to disappear, the above drugs were successively supplemented. The other group (a routine treatment group) continued to be treated with the antihypertensive drugs prescribed in the polyclinic (Fig. 1). BP and heart rate were monitored and the patients' complaints and adverse reactions were recorded on repeated visits 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 52, 64, 70, 88, and 104 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Control blood and urine analyses and ECG studies were made 12, 16, 52, and 104 weeks after therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document