Prerenal Transplant Education and Evaluation Positively Impacts Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 152692482110648
Author(s):  
Michelle T. Jesse ◽  
Erin Clifton ◽  
Dean Y. Kim ◽  
Dayna Nicholson ◽  
Rujuta Patil ◽  
...  

Introduction: An outstanding question in kidney transplantation is how to prepare candidates and their social supports for optimal posttransplant outcomes. Project Aims: This program evaluation assessed whether a pretransplant quality improvement clinic improved clinical outcomes in the year posttransplant compared to recipients receiving standard of care. Design: The Countdown to Transplant Clinic was implemented with kidney transplant candidates expected to receive a transplant within the next few months. The clinic included an enhanced education session on posttransplant lifestyle management, confirmation of support (≥2 adults), and evaluations by transplant social work, psychology, and nephrology. Results: Seventy-five patients participated in the clinic and underwent a transplant. A retrospective chart review of posttransplant laboratory values, rehospitalizations (within 3-months posttransplant), biopsy-confirmed graft failure, and mortality (within 1-year posttransplant) were collected from both groups. Univariate and multivariate propensity score-weighted linear or logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between clinic participation and outcomes. In models adjusting for relevant covariates, participation in The Countdown to Transplant Clinic (vs standard care) was associated with a lower coefficient of variation of serum tacrolimus (all values collected 3-12 months posttransplant), 30-day posttransplant white blood cell counts (but not 90-day), 90-day posttransplant potassium, and 30 and 31 to 90 days rehospitalizations. Clinic participation did not predict serum glucose levels at 30- or 90-days posttransplant. Due to low rates of rejection and mortality, meaningful comparisons were not possible. Conclusion: Participation in a pretransplant, multicomponent clinic may improve certain outcomes of interest posttransplantation. Pilot testing for feasibility for randomized controlled trials is a necessary next step.

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (02) ◽  
pp. 184-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji lijima ◽  
Fumiyo Murakami ◽  
Yasushi Horie ◽  
Katsumi Nakamura ◽  
Shiro Ikawa ◽  
...  

SummaryA 74-year-old female developed pneumonia following herpes simplex encephalitis. Her white blood cell counts reached 28,400/μl, about 90% of which consisted of granulocytes. The polymorphonuclear (PMN) elastase/α1-arantitrypsin complex levels increased and reached the maximum of 5,019 ng/ml, indicating the release of a large amount of elastase derived from the granulocytes. The mechanism of PMN elastase release was most likely to be granulocyte destruction associated with phagocytosis. The cleavage of fibrinogen and fibrin by PMN elastase, independent of plasmin, was indicated by the presence of the fragments in immunoprecipitated plasma from the patient corresponding to elastase-induced FDP D and DD fragments and the absence of fragments corresponding to plasmin-induced FDP D and DD fragments on SDS-PAGE. These findings suggested that the large amount of PMN elastase released from the excessive numbers of granulocytes in this patient with herpes simplex encephalitis and pneumonia, induced the cleavage of fibrinogen and fibrin without the participation of plasmin.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S61-S61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Dare ◽  
Kelsey McCain ◽  
Katherine Lusardi ◽  
Kay Daniels ◽  
Jacob Painter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Molecular-based automated systems for the rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections have potential to improve patient care. The Accelerate Pheno™ blood culture detection system (ACCEL) is an FDA approved platform that allows for identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) 8 hours following growth in routine culture. Methods This is a single-center retrospective chart review of bacteremic adult inpatients before and after implementation of ACCEL. Laboratory and clinical data were collected February–March 2018 (intervention) and compared with a January–April 2017 historical cohort (standard of care). Standard of care ID and AST were performed using VITEK® MS (MALDI-TOF MS) and VITEK®2, respectively. An active antimicrobial stewardship program was in place during both study periods. Patients with polymicrobial cultures, off-panel isolates, previous positive culture, or who were discharged prior to final AST report were excluded. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were inpatient antibiotic duration of therapy (DOT) and time to optimal therapy (TTOT). Nonparametric unadjusted analyses were performed due to non-normal distributions. Statistics were performed using SAS 9.4. Results Of the 143 positive cultures performed on ACCEL during intervention, 118 (83%) were identified as on-panel organisms. Seventy-five (64%) of these 118 cultures and 79 (70%) of 113 reviewed standard of care cultures met inclusion criteria. Patient comorbidities (P = NS), MEWS severity score (P = 0.10), source of bacteremia (P = NS), and pathogen detected (P = 0.30) were similar between cohorts. Time from collection to ID (28.2 ± 12.7 hours vs. 53.8 ± 20.9 hours; P < 0.001) and AST (31.9 ± 11 hours vs. 71.8 ± 20 hours; P < 0.001) were shorter in the intervention arm. Conclusion Compared with standard of care, ACCEL shortens laboratory turn-around-time and improves clinical outcomes. The use of this system has resulted in decreased mean antibiotic DOT, TTOT, and LOS. Further studies are needed to verify these findings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuminori Kawabata ◽  
Takafumi Mizushige ◽  
Keisuke Uozumi ◽  
Kohsuke Hayamizu ◽  
Li Han ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1478
Author(s):  
Lorenzo G. T. M. Segabinazzi ◽  
Giorgia Podico ◽  
Michael F. Rosser ◽  
Som G. Nanjappa ◽  
Marco A. Alvarenga ◽  
...  

In light of PRP’s increasing popularity in veterinary practice, this study aimed to compare three manual methods to prepare and cool equine PRP. The blood of 18 clinically healthy mares was collected via venipuncture in a blood transfusion bag (method 1), blood tubes (method 2), and a syringe (method 3). In method 1, samples were double centrifuged; method 2 involved one centrifugation, and in method 3 the syringe was kept in an upright position to sediment for 4 h. After processing with three methods, PRP and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) were extracted and assessed for red (RBC) and white blood cell counts (WBC), platelet counts, and viability. In a subset of mares (n = 6), samples were processed with the three methods, and PRP was evaluated at 6 and 24 h postcooling at 5 °C. Method 1 resulted in the highest and method 3 in the lowest platelet concentration (p < 0.05), and the latter also had greater contamination with WBC than the others (p < 0.001). Platelet viability was similar across treatments (p > 0.05). Cooling for 24 h did not affect platelet counts in all methods (p > 0.05); however, platelet viability was reduced after cooling PRP produced by method 3 (p = 0.04), and agglutination increased over time in all methods (p < 0.001). The three methods increased (1.8–5.6-fold) platelet concentration in PRP compared to whole blood without compromising platelet viability. In conclusion, all three methods concentrated platelets and while cooling affected their viability. It remains unknown whether the different methods and cooling would affect PRP’s clinical efficacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document