scholarly journals Sport Medicine in the Prevention and Management of Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153473541989406
Author(s):  
Hao Luo ◽  
Daniel A. Galvão ◽  
Robert U. Newton ◽  
Ciaran M. Fairman ◽  
Dennis R. Taaffe
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Sport Medicine ◽  
Sport Participation ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Psychological Benefits ◽  
Active Lifestyle ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Health Promotion Activity ◽  
Prevention Of Cancer

Physical inactivity is a major concern in cancer patients despite the established preventative and therapeutic effects of regular physical exercise for this patient group. Sport not only plays an important role in supporting the development and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle but also is increasingly used as a health promotion activity in various populations. Nevertheless, the potential of sport as an effective strategy in the prevention and management of cancer has gained little attention. Based on the scant evidence to date, participation of cancer patients in supervised, well-tailored sport programs appears to be safe and feasible and is associated with an array of physical and psychological benefits. We propose that sport participation may serve as an alternative strategy in the prevention of cancer and sport medicine in the management of cancer. As with the traditional exercise modes, benefits derived from sport participation will be dependent on the sport undertaken and the physical/physiological, motor, and cognitive demands required. To this end, further work is required to develop a solid evidence base in this field so that targeted sport participation can be recommended for cancer patients.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Physical Activity in Cancer Patients During Oncological Treatments: A Qualitative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542097136
Author(s):  
Alice Avancini ◽  
Daniela Tregnago ◽  
Laura Rigatti ◽  
Giulia Sartori ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Psychological Benefits ◽  
Active Lifestyle ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cues To Action ◽  
Belief Model

Introduction: Although the literature supports the importance of physical activity in the oncological context, in Italy a large number of patients are not sufficiently active. Methods: The present study aimed to explore factors influencing an active lifestyle in cancer patients during oncological treatments. Semi-structured focus groups, including 18 patients with different cancer types, were conducted at the Oncology Unit in the University Hospital Trust of Verona (Italy). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with content analysis. Results: According to the Health Belief Model, transcripts were categorized into the following themes: benefits, barriers, and cues to action. Patients reported a series of physical, physiological, and psychological benefits deriving from an active lifestyle. The main barriers hampering the physical activity participation were represented by treatment-related side effects, advanced disease, and some medical procedures, for example, ileostomy. Several strategies that can trigger patients to exercise were identified. Medical advice, social support from family and friends, features such as enjoyment, setting goals, and owning an animal can motivate patients to perform physical activity. At the same time, an individualized program based on patients’ characteristics, an available physical activity specialist to consult, more detailed information regarding physical activity in the oncological setting, and having accessible structures were found important facilitators to implementing active behavior. Conclusions: Overall, patients have a positive view regarding physical activity, and a variety of obstacles and cues to action were recognized. Considering this information may help to improve adherence to a physical activity program over time, consequently increasing the expected benefits.

scholarly journals Sport Involvement Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Arthritis: Motivations and Constraints to Participation

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 405-405
Author(s):  
Megan Janke ◽  
Julie Son ◽  
Jill Naar ◽  
Stephanie West ◽  
Toni Liechty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Sport Participation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Social Wellbeing ◽  
Constraint Negotiation ◽  
Active Leisure ◽  
Physically Active Leisure

Abstract Although participation in physical activity is recommended for adults with arthritis, research indicates individuals often stop participating in sports and physically active leisure due to the pain and symptoms associated with arthritis (Wilcox et al., 2006). Examining a group of older adults with arthritis, the present study examines motivations and constraints related to participating in sport and physically active leisure as well as how they negotiate constraints. Data (N=1203) were collected through an online questionnaire of adults aged 50 and older in the United States. This study includes individuals reporting a diagnosis of some form of arthritis (n=288; M age = 64.8, SD = 8.08). Approximately 32% self-reported participation in sport in the past 12 months. Descriptive statistics were conducted to explore motivations and constraints to sport involvement. Regressions were run to determine whether constraints and motivations explained adults’ functional mobility and social wellbeing. The most commonly identified motivation for participation was for health purposes (80.2%). Constraints to participation included not being in good enough shape (51.9%) and not having others their age with whom to participate (47.4%). The most commonly identified constraint negotiation was to budget money (51.4%); this is not surprising since sport participation was perceived as expensive (41.3%). Motivations (p<.01) and constraints (p<.001) significantly predicted functional mobility; constraints significantly predicted some aspects of social wellbeing (i.e., coherence, contribution, actualization; p<.05) while constraint negotiation predicted social acceptance (p<.05) and integration (p<.001). Discussion will include implications and strategies for agencies and professionals who work with adults who have arthritis.

scholarly journals Ten Research Priorities Related to Youth Sport, Physical Activity, and Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 920-929
Author(s):  
Erin K. Howie ◽  
Justin M. Guagliano ◽  
Karen Milton ◽  
Stewart A. Vella ◽  
Sjaan R. Gomersall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Sport Participation ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Youth Sport ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Research Priority

Background: Sport has been identified as one of the 7 best investments for increasing physical activity levels across the life span. Several questions remain on how to effectively utilize youth sport as a strategy for increasing physical activity and improving health in youth. The purpose of this paper is to identify the main research priorities in the areas of youth sport and physical activity for health. Methods: An international expert panel was convened, selected to cover a wide spectrum of topics related to youth sport. The group developed a draft set of potential research priorities, and relevant research was scoped. Through an iterative process, the group reached consensus on the top 10 research priorities. Results: The 10 research priorities were identified related to sport participation rates, physical activity from sport, the contribution of sport to health, and the overall return on investment from youth sport. For each research priority, the current evidence is summarized, key research gaps are noted, and immediate research needs are suggested. Conclusion: The identified research priorities are intended to guide researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to increase the evidence base on which to base the design, delivery, and policies of youth sport programs to deliver health benefits.

scholarly journals Impact of Comorbidities on Quality Of Life in Breast Cancer Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 025-028
Author(s):  
Monica Irukulla ◽  
Rama Vaghmare ◽  
Deepa Joseph ◽  
Syed Ahmed ◽  
Jyothi Jonnadula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Bodily Pain ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIntroduction: Comorbidities are common among cancer patients and with an aging population are becoming more prevalent. These can potentially affect the stage at diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of people with cancer. Despite the intimate relationship between comorbidity and cancer, there is limited consensus on how to record, interpret or manage comorbidities in the context of cancer. Addressing the impact of comorbid conditions in cancer patients warrants improvement in the evidence base from which to make treatment decisions for those with comorbidities.Methods: In this prospective study, 64 patients with breast cancer, underwent QOL assessment using FACT –B questionnaire at three time points- pre-radiation and three and six months post radiation.Results: 29(46%) patients had comorbidities of which 23 (35%) had cardiovascular comorbidities and 6 had other comorbidities. The co-morbidities were negatively associated with multiple domains of quality of life, including physical functioning, general health, bodily pain. Patients with diabetes and hypertension had significantly lower scores in physical functioning in comparison to patients without diabetes and hypertension, but improved after treatment. In majority of patients the overall scores were less in patients with co-morbidities compared to patients without any co-morbidity.Conclusion: Comorbidities can significantly affect the quality of life in patients with comorbidities. Hence greater research into the QOL issues for better patient care and symptom management especially during the transitioning phase from active care to follow up will help clinicians improve the quality of care and interdisciplinary co-ordination.

The clinical value and the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 931-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. A. Tjalma ◽  
P. A. Van Dam ◽  
A. P. Makar ◽  
D. J. Cruickshank
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
The Times ◽  
The Cost

The aim of the present article was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients. A literature review was performed regarding the studies that addressed routine follow-up of endometrial cancer. For each published study, the costs of the follow-up program were calculated according to Belgium standards. A mean total of 13% relapsed. Symptomatology and clinical examination detected over 83% of the recurrences. The follow-up cost in euro after 5 and 10 years ranged between 127.68 and 2028.78 and between 207.48 and 2353.48, respectively. Based on the available data, there is little evidence of routine follow-up improving survival rates. Multiple protocols are used in practice without an evidence base. There is an urgent need for prospective randomized studies to evaluate the value of the current so-called ‘standard medical practice of follow-up.’ It is to be expected that the cost of follow-up could be reduced considerably, for instance, by tailoring to low- and high-risk groups, or by abandoning routine follow-up. Symptomatic patients, however, should be evaluated immediately. A reduction in the number of visits and examinations would mean an enormous reduction in costs. This economic benefit would be warmly welcomed in the times of increased health costs and decreased budgets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document