scholarly journals Adjuvant chemotherapy improves prognosis of resectable stage IV colorectal cancer: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591983896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nozawa ◽  
Hirotoshi Takiyama ◽  
Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Kazushige Kawai ◽  
Keisuke Hata ◽  
...  

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is known to be beneficial for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). In contrast, only a few studies have reported the survival benefits of AC for stage IV CRC after curative surgery. Methods: We identified 155 CRC patients with various organ metastases who underwent curative surgery in our hospital between 2003 and 2017. Clinicopathological parameters and postoperative AC were reviewed. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. Moreover, the effects of AC on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: The cohort comprised 94 males and 61 females, with a mean age of 63 years. AC was administered to 57% of patients who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2010 and 76% between 2011 and 2017 ( p = 0.015). AC was more likely administered to patients with a good performance status, high preoperative albumin level, regional node and peritoneal metastases, and no intraoperative blood transfusion. Multivariate analyses identified AC as a significant prognostic factors for RFS and OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.86, p = 0.003, and 2.66, p = 0.002, respectively]. After adjusting for different backgrounds, 5-year RFS and OS rates were higher in patients receiving AC (27% and 67%) than in those without AC (14% and 46%, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0005). Subgroup analyses showed that AC significantly improved RFS in node-negative patients (HR: 2.16, p = 0.029), and RFS and OS in node-positive patients (HR: 2.03, p < 0.0001, and 2.02, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: AC can be discussed with resectable stage IV CRC patients because of its significant survival-improving effects.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18048-18048
Author(s):  
S. Altug ◽  
C. Li ◽  
M. Marek ◽  
S. Guclu ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
...  

18048 Background: The aim of this prospective, multi-country, observational study (B9E-AA-B004) is to estimate the effect of prognostic factors, including continued smoking during therapy, on treatment outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC receiving first- line chemotherapy with a gemcitabine (gem)-platinum combination as part of their routine care. Methods: Major eligibility criteria included: tissue diagnosis of advanced stage IIIB/IV NSCLC not amenable to curative surgery/radiotherapy; no prior chemotherapy; ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1; and written informed consent. A predictive model was constructed and validated by splitting the data at random by centre into two datasets in a ratio of 3:1 Construction:Validation. The primary and secondary endpoints are the effect of prognostic factors on survival and selected adverse events (AEs), respectively. The association of smoking with outcomes was tested in the Construction dataset. Results: This interim analysis to assess the effect of prognostic factors on AEs occurred when all pts had completed treatment. 1214 pts were enrolled: 75.1% male; mean age 60.5 yr, range 23–86 yr; 57.1% Stage IV; 66.2% PS 1; 69.4% received gem-cis, 30.5% gem-carb; 25.7% had never smoked, 70.8% had ever smoked and 11.2% continued smoking during therapy. 22.0% of pts had =1 AE. After variable selection in the Construction database (891 pts) the following factors were associated with an AE possibly related to therapy: disease stage (IV vs III, odds ratio (OR) =1.48, p=0.034), weight loss >10% (OR=0.60, p=0.017), age (<70 vs =70, OR=0.66, p=0.046), treatment (gem- carb vs gem-cis, OR=1.5, p=0.04), pain at baseline (present vs absent, OR=1.5, p=0.03), country (OR vs Taiwan ranged from 0.32 (Israel) to 4.2 (Egypt), p<0.0001). Sex (F vs M, OR=0.86) was then added to the model because of its clinical importance. There was a trend towards a higher probability of an AE with continued smoking during therapy (OR=1.4), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.28). Conclusions: This model can be used to improve the prediction of whether patients are likely to experience treatment-related AEs. While the trend was for a greater AE rate in pts who continued to smoke during therapy, this was not proven. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4539-4539
Author(s):  
M. E. Buyse ◽  
J. Pignon ◽  

4539 Background: Despite potentially curative resection of stomach cancer, 50%-90% of patients die of disease relapse. Numerous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared surgery alone (S) to adjuvant chemotherapy (S+CT), but definitive evidence is lacking. Our group has initiated an individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analysis of all RCTs in the adjuvant gastric setting to quantify the potential benefit of S+CT over S, to study the role of various prognostic factors and their potential interactions with treatments. Methods: All RCTs closed to accrual at the end of 2003 were eligible. Trials with radiotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, or immunotherapy were excluded. The primary endpoint was OS, the secondary endpoint DFS. Baselines variables included age, sex, tumour size (T) and stage, type of resection (D0, D1, D2 or more), performance status (PS) and geographic area. The Logrank test was stratified by trial and treatment arm. Interaction with treatment was explored with Cox model stratified on trial. No multivariate analysis was performed due to the numerous missing data. Results: Thirty-one eligible RCTs (6,613 patients) were identified. As of December 2008, IPD were available from 16 trials (3,710 patients) with a median follow-up exceeding 8 years. OS benefit was significantly in favour of CT (HR=0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.91, p <0.0001) with absolute benefit of 6.3% at 5 years. Were associated with lower survival, older age (>66 vs <50) (HR=1.51, 95%CI= 1.31–1.73), PS2 (HR=1.71, 95%CI=1.35–2.15), higher UICC stage (HR=1.41 per unit 95%CI=1.35–1.46) and T>1 (HR=1.57 per unit, 95%CI=1.47–1.67). There was also a strong geographical influence on prognosis (HR=0.30, 95%CI 0.26–0.34 and HR=1.26, 95%CI 1.13–1.41, respectively in Asia and in the US as compared to Europe). Treatment interactions were not identified for all but the stage. Treatment effect appeared slightly stronger for patients with higher stages (HR for treatment effect from 0.88 in stage I to 0.66 in stage IV). Conclusions: Our interim results show a modest but significant OS benefit in favour of adjuvant CT and confirm the impact of tumour staging as well as age and PS on OS. Asian patients have a much better survival than other patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Masatsune Shibutani ◽  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
Hisashi Nagahara ◽  
Hiroshi Ohtani ◽  
Tetsuro Ikeya ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymphopenia associated with chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy after undergoing potentially curative surgery. Summary of background data: Lymphocyte plays an important role in anti-tumor immunity. Lymphopenia is sometimes induced during the period of adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic significance of lymphopenia associated with chemotherapy is unknown. Methods: One hundred and fifteen patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative surgery for stage II/III colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients were classified into two groups, the lymphopenia group and the normal group, according to minimum lymphocyte count during the period of adjuvant chemotherapy. Lymphopenia was defined as a lymphocyte count of less than 1,000/Ã&#x8e;¼l. Lymphopenia associated with chemotherapy was found in 17 of the 115 patients (14.8%). Results: Lymphopenia was associated with a worse disease-free survival (p=0.018). Moreover, in a multivariate analysis, lymphopenia associated with chemotherapy was identified to be an independent prognostic factor.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1559-1559
Author(s):  
Hae Ran Yun ◽  
Woo Yong Lee ◽  
Won Suk Lee ◽  
Yong Beom Cho ◽  
Seong Hyeon Yun ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13568-13568
Author(s):  
M. Mullane ◽  
T. Lad ◽  
B. Cleveland ◽  
B. Yim ◽  
D. Tamkus ◽  
...  

13568 Background: Oxaliplatin and 5FU based regimens have become standard first line treatment for stage IV colorectal cancer. At our institution predominately the regimens FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin/infusional 5FU via a central venous catheter) and XELOX (oxaliplatin/ capecitabine given orally) are used. We performed a retrospective review of 40 patients to see if any differences, primarily in toxicities, but also in response, emerged. Methods: . Twenty consecutive patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer who received FOLFOX6 as initial therapy and twenty consecutive patients who received initial XELOX, with the oxaliplatin given via a peripheral IV, were analyzed. The decision to administer FOLFOX6 or XELOX was not made for clinical reasons, but came about from logistical difficulties placing central venous catheters in our institution, due to cost and operating time. Comparisons were performed with a Mann Whitney test. The two groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, and performance status. Response evaluations were made based on RECIST criteria. Results: Toxicities compared in the two groups (FOLFOX6 v. XELOX) were gastrointestinal, >Gr. II (5 v. 20%); dermatologic, >Gr. III (0 v. 35%); bone marrow, > Gr. II (15 v. 20%); neurologic, >Gr. III peripheral neuropathy (10 v. 10%); and development of arm pain/discomfort (0 v. 30%). The two toxicities reaching a significant difference, with the higher incidence from XELOX, were > Grade II dermatitis (p= 0.03) and development of arm pain (p=0.05). The response rate of FOLFOX6 was 75% and that for XELOX was 55% (p value of 0.144). Conclusions: Our conclusions from this analysis are that the two regimens are comparable in terms of response, but that FOLFOX6 may be preferable in order to avoid severe dermatitis and if XELOX is the treatment choice, serious consideration should given to administer the oxaliplatin via a central catheter. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7644-7644
Author(s):  
V. Paralkar ◽  
T. Li ◽  
C. J. Langer

7644 Background: With increasing use of MRI and PET to stage NSCLC, the demographics, performance status and distribution of metastases at diagnosis in this patient (pt) population are changing; it is important to reassess the prognostic roles played by baseline clinical variables in the modern therapeutic era. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the charts of 189 consecutive, unselected pts with stage IV NSCLC seen and followed at the Fox Chase Cancer Center between Oct 2000 and Aug 2003. Data on a variety of pt variables including demographics, histology, metastases, key laboratory tests and treatment were compiled. We intended to identify those that played statistically significant prognostic roles. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 62 years; 77% of pts had PS 0–1 at first presentation. 58% had single organ metastasis; 35% had metastases to the brain (half of these had brain only and a third had solitary brain metastasis). 51% of all pts received palliative radiation to the brain at some point after dx. Overall median survival was 10.8 months. The 1-yr, 2-yr, 3-yr and 4-yr overall survival rates were 44.2%, 21.9%, 11.6% and 7.8% respectively. On multivariate analysis, statistically significant negative prognostic factors included PS ≥ 2 (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1–3.3), serum albumin ≤ 3 (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1–2.8) and metastases to > 1 organ (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.03–2.3). Bone and liver metastases, though associated with worse survival in univariate analysis, were not found to be independent predictors of survival. Gender had no bearing on outcome. Conclusions: Survival rates in this advanced NSCLC cohort equal or exceed contemporaneous ECOG figures. PS, serum albumin and number of organs with metastases are independent prognostic factors in NSCLC. The increasing detection of brain metastases at 1st presentation of metastatic NSCLC suggests that the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the management of early NSCLC should be explored. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9051-9051
Author(s):  
D. R. Minor ◽  
M. Kashani-Sabet ◽  
D. Moore ◽  
C. Kim ◽  
S. S. Venna ◽  
...  

9051 Background: Patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma are usually felt to be incurable with a median survival of 6.4 months and a 5-year survival of only 2%. Biochemotherapy has shown promise with long-term survival in selected patients. We felt the study of prognostic factors would determine which patients might benefit the most from this intensive therapy. Methods: 135 consecutive patients with stage IV melanoma treated with decrescendo biochemotherapy followed by maintenance immunotherapy at one melanoma treatment center were studied to determine the most important prognostic factors; these factors were then validated by analysis of 133 patients treated in a multi-center trial at other institutions. Patients were treated using the inpatient regimen of O'Day (JCO23:710s,2005 abstract). Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 16.6 months with 1-year survival of 70% and 5-year survival of 28%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months with 15% progression-free at 5 years. PFS curves showed no relapses after 30 months, so remissions were durable. For OS performance status 0, normal LDH, stage M1a, and non-visceral sites of metastases were favorable prognostic factors. For PFS performance status 0, normal LDH, female sex, age <50 and stage M1a were favorable prognostic factors Multivariate analysis demonstrated two important prognostic factors for survival: normal serum LDH and the presence of either skin or nodes as one of the sites of metastatic disease. The group with normal LDH and skin or node metastases had a relatively good prognosis with median survival of 44 months and a 5-year survival of 38%. Conversely patients with elevated LDH without any skin or nodal metastases had a poor prognosis, with no long-term survivors. Conclusions: Metastatic melanoma patients treated with biochemotherapy and maintenance immunotherapy that have either a normal LDH or skin or nodes as one of their metastatic sites may have durable remissions of their disease, and this therapy should be studied further in these groups. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22217-e22217
Author(s):  
T. Salman ◽  
A. Bilici ◽  
B. O. Ustaalioglu ◽  
M. Seker ◽  
B. Sonmez ◽  
...  

e22217 Background: There are many ongoing researchs for novel prognostic factors in colorectal cancers. Increased thromboembolic events were associated with poor prognosis and survival in cancer patients. Thrombin-activated fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), which has inhibitory effects on fibrinolysis, was proven to play a major role in hypercoagulopathy and was reported to reach high blood levels in cancer patients compared to those in the general population. Methods: TAFI levels were measured. The correlation between those levels and clinicopathologic features were analyzed in 82 patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer receiving treatment in our clinic. Results: Eighty-two patients were evaluated. Patients characteristics included 54 males (65.9%), 28 females (34.1%); median age 56.4 (range:24–76). The mean TAFI levels was 198,36±70,01 Ğer yazali and TAFI levels were found to be high in 70% of patients. High levels of TAFI were more common in rectum cancer patients compared with colon cancer patients. There was no significant correlation between TAFI levels and clinicopathologic factors, such as age, sex, body mass index, performance status, number of metastases, grade, vascular invasion, perineural invasion and CEA levels. The TAFI levels of patients receiving bevacizumab (202.1±66.6) were more higher than those no receiving (191,83±76,21), but this association was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusions: Although the statistical analysis proved insignificant in our study, the effect of thromboembolic events on prognosis and survival is well established. Thus, large scale prospective studies are required to determine prognostic factors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14021-e14021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Yu ◽  
R. Woods ◽  
C. Speers ◽  
S. Gill ◽  
H. F. Kennecke

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18006-e18006
Author(s):  
Thierry Berghmans ◽  
Luc Willems ◽  
Marianne Paesmans ◽  
Lieveke Ameye ◽  
Jean-Jacques Lafitte ◽  
...  

e18006 Background: Main prognostic factors for survival in NSCLC pts are stage and performance status (PS) while sex, histology and others are reported. However, these variables do not allow predicting individual prognosis, justifying further research. MiRNA are small non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression. As a secondary aim of a prospective study, we looked at the prognostic value of tumour miRNA on survival in NSCLC pts treated by cisplatin (60 mg/m2 D1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, D1+8) 1st line chemotherapy. Methods: During the diagnostic bronchoscopy, a biopsy was lysed into Tripure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostics) on ice, snap frozen and stored at -80°C. MiRNA expression was assessed using TaqMan Low Density Arrays (756 human miRNA panel, Applied Biosystems) and normalized using the delta delta CT method to RNU48 (SNORD48) CT value for every sample. Survival was measured from the registration date. Results: The main characteristics of 38 eligible pts were: median age 60 years, male 27 (71%), 80-100 Karnofsky PS in 26 (68%), adenocarcinoma 20 (53%), stage IV 30 (79%). At time of analysis, 25 pts were dead. After stepwise selection among 756 analysed miRNA, a combination of 4 miRNA including miR-200c, miR-424, miR-29c and miR-124 provided a prognostic signature for survival. Using a linear combination of the miRNA CT values with Cox's regression coefficients as weights, we constructed a prognostic score. With a cut-off of 52, the signature distinguished pts with good (n = 18) and poor (n = 20) prognosis with respective median survival of 47.3 months (95% CI 29.8-52.4) and 15.5 months (95% CI 9.1-22.8) (p <0.001; hazard ratio 21.1, 95% CI 4.7-94.9). The same signature discriminated pts with “good progression-free survival” (median 19.8 months; 95% CI 15.3-33.8) from the others (median 9.1 months; 95% CI 6.3-15.5) (p <0.001; hazard ratio 3.8, 95% CI 1.7-8.7). Conclusions: A 4 miRNA signature is associated with improved survival in patients with advanced stage NSCLC treated with 1st line cisplatin and vinorelbine. These results need confirmation in an independent cohort and the signature has to be compared to conventional prognostic factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document