scholarly journals Immune status of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma patients and its therapeutic modulation under LenDex: a longitudinal analysis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (9) ◽  
pp. 1151-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María Victoria Mateos ◽  
Luis Ignacio Sanchez-Abarca ◽  
Noemi Puig ◽  
María-Belén Vidriales ◽  
...  

Key Points High-risk SMM patients’ immune status is mildly impaired as compared with age-matched healthy individuals. High-risk SMM patients can be effectively immunomodulated by lenalidomide, even when combined with low-dose dexamethasone.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1470-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernon Wu ◽  
Erin Moshier ◽  
Siyang Leng ◽  
Bart Barlogie ◽  
Hearn Jay Cho ◽  
...  

Key Points FLCr ≥100 and BMPC ≥60% identify high-risk SMM, although with more modest median TTP and 2-year PD than previously published. Baseline immunoparesis, eMP, eHb, and edFLC can help identify an ultra-high-risk SMM cohort.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Niccolo’ Bolli ◽  
Nicola Sgherza ◽  
Paola Curci ◽  
Rita Rizzi ◽  
Vanda Strafella ◽  
...  

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic plasma cell neoplasm, is currently diagnosed according to the updated IMWG criteria, which reflect an intermediate tumor mass between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and active MM. However, SMM is a heterogeneous entity and individual case may go from an “MGUS-like” behavior to “early MM” with rapid transformation into symptomatic disease. This wide range of clinical outcomes poses challenges for prognostication and management of individual patients. However, initial studies showed a benefit in terms of progression or even survival for early treatment of high-risk SMM patients. While outside of clinical trials the conventional approach to SMM generally remains that of close observation, these studies raised the question of whether early treatment should be offered in high-risk patients, prompting evaluation of several different therapeutic approaches with different goals. While delay of progression to MM with a non-toxic treatment is clearly achievable by early treatment, a convincing survival benefit still needs to be proven by independent studies. Furthermore, if SMM is to be considered less biologically complex than MM, early treatment may offer the chance of cure that is currently not within reach of any active MM treatment. In this paper, we present updated results of completed or ongoing clinical trials in SMM treatment, highlighting areas of uncertainty and critical issues that will need to be addressed in the near future before the “watch and wait” paradigm in SMM is abandoned in favor of early treatment.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (16) ◽  
pp. 2504-2512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Sawyer ◽  
Erming Tian ◽  
Christoph J. Heuck ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
Donald J. Johann ◽  
...  

Key Points Jumping translocations of 1q12 (JT1q12) provide a mechanism for the deletion of 17p in cytogenetically defined high-risk myeloma. Sequential JT1q12s introduce unexpected copy number gains and losses in receptor chromosomes during subclonal evolution.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (19) ◽  
pp. 2297-2306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger S. Nijhof ◽  
Laurens E. Franssen ◽  
Mark-David Levin ◽  
Gerard M. J. Bos ◽  
Annemiek Broijl ◽  
...  

Key Points REP is an active combination in MM patients refractory to lenalidomide. REP is an all-oral and generally well-tolerated regimen.


Leukemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1840-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ola Landgren ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Yael C. Cohen ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Peter Voorhees ◽  
...  

Abstract Current guidelines for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) recommend active monitoring until the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) before initiating treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial. Earlier intervention may delay progression to MM. In CENTAURUS, 123 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk SMM were randomly assigned to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on extended intense (intense), extended intermediate (intermediate), or short dosing schedules. At the prespecified primary analysis (15.8-month median follow-up), the complete response (CR) rates (co-primary endpoint) were 2.4%, 4.9%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively; the co-primary endpoint of CR rate >15% was not met. Progressive disease (PD)/death rates (number of patients who progressed or died divided by total duration of progression-free survival [PFS] in patient-years; co-primary endpoint) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.055 (80% confidence interval [CI], 0.014–0.096), 0.102 (80% CI, 0.044–0.160), and 0.206 (80% CI, 0.118–0.295), respectively, translating to a median PFS ≥24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and =0.0213, respectively). With longer follow-up (median follow-up, 25.9 months), CR rates were 4.9%, 9.8%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. PD/death rates for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.059 (80% CI, 0.025–0.092), 0.107 (80% CI, 0.058–0.155), and 0.150 (80% CI, 0.089–0.211), respectively, again translating to a median PFS ≥ 24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001 for all arms). Twenty-four–month PFS rates were 89.9% (90% CI, 78.5–95.4%), 82.0% (90% CI, 69.0–89.9%), and 75.3% (90% CI, 61.1–85.0%) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that intense dosing maintained target-saturating trough concentrations in most patients throughout weekly, every-2-week, and every-4-week dosing periods. No new safety signals were observed. These data provide the basis for an ongoing phase 3 study of daratumumab in SMM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8512-8512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noemí Puíg ◽  
Teresa Contreras ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
M Teresa Cedena ◽  
Joaquin Martinez-Lopez ◽  
...  

8512 Background: The GEM-CESAR trial is a potentially curative strategy for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRsMM) patients (pts) in which the primary endpoint is the achievement of sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow (BM) by next generation flow (NGF). The value of BM MRD assessment in MM is proven, but alternative, non-invasive methods, accurately reflecting disease burden are needed. Methods: Pts received six 4-week cycles of KRd as induction (K:36mg/m2 twice weekly, R: lenalidomide 25mg po od days 1-21 and d:dexamethasone 40mg po weekly) followed by melphalan 200mg/m2, two further cycles of KRd as consolidation and up to 2 years of Rd (R:10mg/d, d:20mg/week). Efficacy was analyzed in parallel in BM samples by NGF and in serum by SPEP/IFE and QIP-MS/QIP-FLC-MS in 52 out of the 90 pts enrolled in the trial. Standard and MRD responses were carried out as per the IMWG guidelines. For QIP-MS serum immunoglobulins were purified using polyclonal antibodies (anti-IgG, -IgA, -IgM, -total κ and -total λ light chain, -free κ and -free λ light chain). Mass spectra were generated on a MALDI-TOF-MS system. Results: Overall response rate (ORR) was 98% post-induction, 98% post-ASCT, and 100% post-consolidation; 38.4%, 61.5% and 68.6% of pts reached ≥ complete response at each time-point and, among them, 23%, 44% and 55% achieved flow MRD-negativity. Using the combination of QIP-MS/QIP-FLC-MS, the percentage of pts without detectable disease at each timepoint lowered to 12%, 27% and 38% reflecting the higher sensitivity of the method. Against NGF, QIP-MS/QIP-FLC-MS provided negative predictive values of 67%, 92% and 89% (p = 0,0206; p < 0,001; p = 0,003) and identified disease in 95%, 97% and 92% of pts that were positive by NGF-MRD at each respective timepoint. Three pts from this cohort have progressed so far: two were NGF+/MS+ at the three timepoints whilst 1 remained NGF- but QIP-MS/FLC-MS+ throughout. Conclusions: The GEM-CESAR treatment strategy induces a high ORR in HRsMM pts, and the % of cases achieving flow-MRD negativity post-ASCT meets the primary endpoint of the trial. The combined use of QIP-MS and FLC-MS offers higher sensitivity relative to standard methods and may provide relevant information about the right timing for performing a BM aspirate/biopsy. Clinical trial information: NCT02415413 .


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (13) ◽  
pp. 2095-2100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hebraud ◽  
Florence Magrangeas ◽  
Alice Cleynen ◽  
Valerie Lauwers-Cances ◽  
Marie-Lorraine Chretien ◽  
...  

Key Points Additional chromosomal changes modulate the outcome of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document