Biomarker Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Receiving Checkpoint Blockade

Abstract Introduction Immuno-oncology shows significant promise in the treatment of malignancy but is associated with a variety of immune-related adverse events. We previously reported that venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in over 20% of patients treated with checkpoint blockade. We therefore have attempted to identify biomarkers/risk factors for VTE in this population that might provide a means to target prophylactic anticoagulant therapy to individuals at highest risk for this complication. Methods We used a database of 1,686 patients who received any of six approved immunotherapies (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab or durvalumab) between July 2015 and December 2017 to identify patients with VTE events including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and visceral vein thrombosis (VVT). For biomarker/risk factors assessment, we defined a subcohort of cancer patients with (n=14) or without (n=10) VTE after receiving immunotherapy that had consented to blood and data collection in compliance with guidelines approved by the Cleveland Clinic institutional review board. Age matched healthy controls (n = 9) were also included in the analysis. Phenotyping of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) was performed on fresh peripheral blood samples following isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and flow cytometry. We measured 1) total MDSC (CD33+HLADR−), and within that population, 2) monocytic M-MDSC (CD14+CD15−), 3) polymorphonuclear/granulocytic PMN-MDSC (CD14−CD15+), 4) immature I-MDSC (CD14−CD15−), as well as surface expression of PD1 and PDL1. Analysis of soluble plasma biomarkers was performed in parallel using the validated Meso Scale Discovery V-PLEX Human Biomarker 54-Plex assay. Results The study group included 7 patients with bladder cancer, 7 with melanoma, 6 with renal cell carcinoma, and 4 with lung cancer. Total MDSC levels in all cancer patients receiving immunotherapy were significantly higher than those of age matched healthy controls (4.278, n=24 vs 1.543, n=9; p = 0.0198). Cancer patients receiving immunotherapy who developed VTE had significantly more PMN-MDSC than patients without VTE (12.59, n=14 vs 1.641, n=10; p = 0.0474). Cancer patients receiving immunotherapy who developed VTE also had elevated levels of pre-immunotherapy total MDSC compared to non-VTE counterparts, though these differences did not achieve statistical significance (4.948, n=14 vs 3.341; NS). Of 54 soluble plasma biomarkers tested, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels were also significantly higher in patients who developed VTE compared to those who did not (1.210 vs 0.8955 mg/ml, p= 0.0285; and 221.2 vs 115.0, p= 0.0174, respectively). Conclusions VTE is a common but underappreciated complication in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. There are no formal risk tools or biomarkers predictive of VTE in cancer patients initiating immunotherapy. We have identified candidate cellular and plasma biomarkers that associate with thrombotic risk in this population and provide potential insight into its pathophysiology. Prospective and mechanistic studies are underway to validate and further expand these findings. Disclosures Khorana: Janssen: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. McCrae:Sanofi Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Clinical Impact and Course of Anticoagulant-Related Major Bleeding in Cancer Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2611.2611 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2611-2611 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Noémie Kraaijpoel ◽

Nick van Es ◽

Suzanne M Bleker ◽

Marjolein P Brekelmans ◽

Elise S Eerenberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Clinical Presentation ◽

Clinical Course ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Anticoagulant Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a frequent complication in cancer patients. During anticoagulant treatment for VTE, the risk of major bleeding events (MBE) is 2- to 6-fold higher in cancer patients than in those without cancer. It is unknown whether the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related MBE in cancer patients differ from patients without cancer. Methods Individual patient data from 4 randomized controlled phase III trials in which factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) were compared with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used for the present analysis. The severity of the clinical presentation and clinical course of anticoagulant-related MBE were compared between patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of MBE were classified into four categories by independent adjudicators, who were blinded to treatment allocation. Category 1 indicates a mild clinical presentation or course, while category 4 indicates a severe presentation or course (Table 1). A one-stage meta-analysis was used to estimate crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex, and type of anticoagulant treatment with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course. For this analysis categories 3 and 4 were combined. We also explored the cause and site of bleeding in these patients. Results The study group comprised 290 patients with MBE, of whom 50 (17%) had active cancer or were diagnosed with cancer during follow-up. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.47-1.72). Clinical course was judged to be severe in 20% and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35-1.61) (Table 2). The bleeding pattern varied significantly between the two groups (p=0.002); cancer patients more often had gastrointestinal (52% vs. 35%) and vaginal (14% vs. 6%) MBE, whereas intracranial (19% vs. 6% and retroperitoneal (5% vs. 0%) MBE occurred more often in patients without cancer (Table 3). MBE was related to the tumor site in 40% of cancer patients. Conclusion The findings of the present study indicate that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related MBE are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer, which is reassuring for physicians who treat cancer-associated VTE. Disclosures Eerenberg: Sanquin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Baxter: Consultancy. Middeldorp:Aspen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy; Sanquin: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cohen:Takeda: Consultancy; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Department of Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Medscape: Speakers Bureau; UK Government Health Select Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Colation to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism: Other: Founder; NHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria; XO1: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Lifeblood: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Dalteparin Thromboprophylaxis in Cancer Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomized Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.427.427 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 427-427 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Alok A. Khorana ◽

Charles W. Francis ◽

Nicole Kuderer ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

Thomas L. Ortel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Efficacy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Intention To Treat ◽

Efficacy Outcome ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract Background: Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score. We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in such high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods: Cancer patients at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥3) and initiating a new systemic chemotherapy regimen were screened for VTE and, if negative, randomized to either dalteparin 5000 units daily subcutaneously or no prophylactic anticoagulation for 12 weeks. Subjects in both arms were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study. Primary efficacy endpoint was any VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated due to poor accrual. Results: Of 117 enrolled patients, 19 were not randomized due to the presence of VTE on initial screening (N=10, 8.5%) or for other reasons (N=9). The mean age was 59 years with 46% female and 54% male, similar in both arms. The most common primary sites of cancer were pancreas, gastro-esophageal junction, lung and lymphoma. Over three-fourths of patients in each arm had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.Of 98 patients randomized, VTE occurred in 12% (N=6/50) of patients on the dalteparin arm and 21% (N=10/48) on the control arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89) (absolute risk reduction 9%, relative risk reduction 42%, number needed to treat = 12). Major bleeding was similar (N=1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in the dalteparin arm (N=7 versus 1 in the control arm) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significant reduced risk of VTE with no effect on major bleeding or survival but increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study population. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during study. The high incidence of baseline VTE suggests that consideration should be given to screening high-risk patients in clinical practice prior to starting systemic therapy. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. (Funded by NIH/NHLBI R01HL095109; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876915). Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients Enrolled in the PHACS trial Dalteparin Observation Total Enrolled (n) Baseline VTE, n (%) DVT PE Other reasons for not randomizing Randomized (n) Age, mean (SD), y --- --- --- --- --- 50 60 (10) --- --- --- --- --- 48 58 (12) 117 10 (9%) 6* (5%) 4 (3%) 9 98 59 (11) Gender, n (%) Female 21 (42%) 24 (50%) 45 (46%) Male 29 (58%) 24 (50%) 53 (54%) Primary Tumor Site, No. (%) Gynecologic 4 (8%) 4 (8%) 8 (8%) Colorectal 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 4 (4%) GE junction 8 (16%) 4 (8%) 12 (25%) Lung 6 (12%) 7(15%) 13 (27%) Genitourinary 2 (4%) 0 (0%) 2 (2%) Lymphoma 5 (10%) 2 (4%) 7 (15%) Breast 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 2 (2%) Pancreatic 19 (38%) 17 (35%) 36 (37%) Gastric 4 (8%) 6 (13%) 10 (10%) Other 0 (0%) 4 (8%) 4 (4%) Previous history of VTE, n (%) 4 (8%) 2 (4%) 6 (6%) *NOTE: 1 subject had both DVT and PE at baseline screening Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Figure 1. Cumulative Incidence Curves for the Primary Efficacy Outcome in the Intention-to-Treat Population, According to Study Arm. Figure 1. Cumulative Incidence Curves for the Primary Efficacy Outcome in the Intention-to-Treat Population, According to Study Arm. Disclosures Khorana: Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Randomized trial of dalteparin as prophylaxis. The drug is approved for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis but not for prophylaxis.. Francis:Eisai: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; NHLBI: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy. Kuderer:Hospira: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Carrier:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Ortel:Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy; Instrumentation Laboratory: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Wun:Janssen: Consultancy. Iyer:Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentec: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Lyman:Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Validation of the Ottawa Score in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism. the Predicare Cohort Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129087 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 167-167 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Guy Meyer ◽

Celine Chapelle ◽

Philippe Girard ◽

Florian Scotté ◽

Anne Lamblin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Recurrent Vte ◽

Support Research

Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a difficult to treat condition in patients with cancer with a persisting risk of recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Recent data suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) are associated with a lower risk of recurrence but a higher risk of bleeding in these patients. Predicting the risk of recurrent VTE with LMWH may help to select the best treatment option. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study in cancer patients with VTE treated with tinzaparin for 6 months in order to validate the Ottawa score (NCT03099031) and search for additional risk of recurrent VTE. The Ottawa score is composed of 5 variables, female sex (+1), lung cancer (+1), breast cancer (-1) cancer stage 1 (-2) and previous DVT (+1). A score ≤0 is associated with a low risk of recurrent VTE. Methods Adult cancer patients with recent diagnosis of documented symptomatic or incidental VTE (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with tinzaparin for 6 months were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE within the first 6 months of treatment with tinzaparin. Other endpoints were symptomatic recurrent VTE, major bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), all-cause mortality within 3 and 6 months. All events were adjudicated by a Central Adjudication Committee. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated by the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method to take into account the competing risk of death. Cumulative incidences were presented with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). To validate the Ottawa score, the area under the curve (AUC) and its 95% CI were calculated on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis; the most discriminant cut-off was then determined by calculating the Youden index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify additional predictive factors of recurrent VTE to those included in the Ottawa score using the Fine and Gray method and adjusted on factors included in the Ottawa score. Hazard ratio and their 95% CI were calculated. Results A total of 409 patients were included and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis; the median age was 68 years and 51% of patients were males. 60.4% of patients had a PE (with or without DVT) .64% received chemotherapy at inclusion or in the month before inclusion. Lung (31.3%) and digestive track (18.3%) cancers were the most common cancer types and 67.0% had stage IV cancers. According to Ottawa score, 58% of patients were classified at high clinical probability of recurrence (score ≥ 1). During the 6 months treatment period, 23 patients had a recurrent VTE, yielding a cumulative incidence of 6.1% (95% CI 4.0-9.3) with a median time for recurrent VTE of 33 days. The recurrence rate of VTE was estimated to 7.8% (95% CI 4.9-12.5) for patients classified at high risk of recurrence according to the Ottawa score (score ≥ 1) compared to 3.8% (95%CI 1.6-8.9) for other patients (Ottawa score < 1). AUC of the Ottawa score was 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.65). In multivariable analysis, none of the potential risk factors for recurrent VTE was significantly associated with recurrent VTE at 6 months. During the 6 months treatment period, 15 patients had a major bleeding and 2 patients experienced a HIT. At 3 and 6 months, 104 and 144 patients had died yielding a cumulative incidence of 26.1%, (95% CI 21.8-30.4) and 37.8% (95% CI 32.8-42.9), respectively. The main cause of death was underlying cancer. Conclusion In this prospective cohort of patients with cancer receiving LMWH for VTE, the Ottawa score did not accurately predict recurrent VTE. No other clinical predictor of recurrent VTE was identified in this study. Disclosures Meyer: Bayer: Other: travel support; LEO pharma: Other: travel support, Research Funding; SANOFI: Other: travel support, Research Funding; BMS-Pfizer: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Girard:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Scotté:LEO Pharma A/S: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tesaro: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pierre Fabre Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lamblin:Leo Pharma: Employment. Laporte:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston scientific: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo-Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Low Dose Apixaban As Secondary Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients, 30 Months Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148105 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3231-3231

Author(s):

Trine-Lise Hannevik ◽

Herish Garresori ◽

Jorunn Brekke ◽

Tone Ronnaug Enden ◽

Hege Froen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Full Dose ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Apixaban is a treatment option for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. There are no data on the effect of low dose apixaban after 6 months treatment. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily as prophylaxis for recurrent VTE after 6 months initial treatment with full-dose apixaban. Patients and methods: We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE. All patients were treated with full dose apixaban for the first 6 months. After 6 months, all patients with active cancer continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and were followed for the next 30 months. The primary endpoint of efficacy was recurrent VTE, the primary safety endpoint was major bleedings. Clinically relevant non-major bleedings was a secondary endpoint. The endpoints are reported as incidence rates or fractions with 95% confidence intervals, and as Kaplan-Meier plots. Results: During the first 6 months of full-dose anticoagulation 12 of 298 patients had recurrent VTE (4.0%, 95% confidence interval 2.1-6.9), 16 experienced major bleeding (5.4%, 95% CI 2.8-7.9%), and 26 patients experienced one or more episodes of CRNMB (8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12) as previously reported. 1 Of the 298 patients included, 196 continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months. During treatment from 6 to 36 months with low-dose apixaban 15 of 196 (7.6%, 95% CI: 4.4-12) patients had recurrent VTE, 7 (3.6%, CI: 1.5-7.2) patients experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.2%, 95% CI: 4.7-13) patients experienced CRNMB. The highest incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleedings were seen during the first month of full-dose apixaban (Table 1). After the dose reduction of apixaban, the incidence rate of recurrent VTE increased slightly during 6 to 12 months while the incidence rate of major bleeding decreased during the same time-period. After 12 months the incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleeding was low and remained low during the entire 30 months follow-up (Table 1 and Figure 1). The Kaplan-Meier plot of the composite endpoint of recurrent VTE or major bleeding did not change after dose-reduction. After about 9 months treatment (i.e. 3 months on low dose apixaban) the Kaplan-Meier curve of the composite endpoint flattened out. Conclusion: Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full dose anticoagulation resulted in a small increase in recurrent VTE, but a marked decrease in major bleedings during the 6-12 months period. After approximately 9 months the frequency of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low compared with the first 6 months of full-dose treatment. Reducing the dose of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full-dose treatment appears safe and effective. References 1. Hannevik TL, Brekke J, Enden T, et al: Thrombosis and bleedings in a cohort of cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res, 2020 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hannevik: Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garresori: Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Froen: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porojnicu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Ghanima: Bayer, BMS/Pﬁzer: Research Funding; Amgen, Novartis, Pﬁzer, Bristol Myers Squibb, SOBI, Griffols, Sanoﬁ: Honoraria; Amgen, Novartis, Pﬁzer, Principia Biopharma Inc- a Sanoﬁ Company, Sanoﬁ, SOBI, Griffols, UCB, Argenx: Consultancy. Dahm: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Risk Stratification for the Development of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4728.4728 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4728-4728 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Arabesque Parker ◽

Erica A. Peterson ◽

Agnes Y. Y. Lee ◽

Carine de Wit ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

High Risk ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction: No method of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification exists for hospitalized cancer patients. The Khorana score is a validated tool in outpatients with cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the Khorana score for predicting development of VTE in cancer patients during admission to hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from healthcare records of consecutive, medically-ill cancer patients hospitalized between January and June 2010 in 3 academic medical centers in Canada. Objectively diagnosed symptomatic VTE during hospitalization, anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (TP), and Khorana score variables were collected for every patient. Patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation at admission, and those with incomplete data were excluded. The risk of VTE based on Khorana score category was evaluated using logistic regression. Continuous data were compared using a Student's t-test and expressed using the means and standard deviations. Categorical data were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test and were expressed as percentages. Statistical significance was defined as alpha less than 0.05. Results: 1398 patients were included. Mean age was 61.6 years, 51.2% were male, and mean BMI was 25.9 kg/m2. The most frequent tumor types were non-small cell lung carcinoma (12.7%) followed by lymphoma (10.9%). The median length of stay was 6 days (range 0-114 days). The most frequent reasons for hospitalization were chemotherapy (22.3%) followed by pain and palliation (21.4%). 34.5% received anticoagulant TP (n = 483/1398). The incidence of VTE was 2.9% (41/1398) overall, 5.4% (9/166) in high, 3.2% (26/817) in moderate, and 1.4% (6/415) in low Khorana score risk groups. High risk patients were significantly more likely than low risk patients to have VTE (p=0.016; OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-11.2). There was no difference in VTE incidence between patients who received anticoagulant TP and those who did not (3.5% vs 2.6%, p = 0.345). Patients with high risk Khorana score were more likely to receive anticoagulant TP than those with low risk Khorana score (46.4% vs. 23.9%, p <0.001, OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.0). Total incidence of major bleeding was 1.8% (25/1398). There was no difference in major bleeding between patients who received anticoagulant TP and those who did not (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.787). Conclusion: The Khorana score is predictive of VTE development in cancer patients who are hospitalized for medical illness and may be a useful tool for tailoring inpatient anticoagulant prophylaxis. Disclosures Lee: LEO: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Carrier:BMS: Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Wu:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Venous thromboembolism and cancer: pathophysiology and incidence

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000358 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 43 (4) ◽

pp. 239-243 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Hans Stricker

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Venous Thrombosis ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Clinical Manifestation ◽

The Other ◽

Therapeutic Interventions ◽

Prothrombotic State ◽

Thrombotic Risk ◽

Surgical Interventions

A relationship between tumor and thrombosis is well known. This review covers the aspect of incidence and pathophysio-logy of cancer-related thromboembolism. Cancer patients have an up to 7 % risk of developing venous thrombosis, partly because they are subject to various circumstantial risk factors such as surgical interventions, immobilization or drugs during their illness. On the other hand, tumors frequently generate a prothrombotic state, which may remain without clinical manifestation or result in anticoagulant-resistent venous thromboembolism. Recently discovered thrombosis-generating mechanisms could help to classify patients in categories with high and low thrombotic risk, which will allow tailored prophylactic and therapeutic interventions.

Download Full-text

Validation of the International Prognostic Score for Thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythemia (IPSET) in Patients with Pre-Fibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124302 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1657-1657

Author(s):

Paola Guglielmelli ◽

Alessandra Carobbio ◽

Elisa Rumi ◽

Valerio De Stefano ◽

Lara Mannelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Model ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Thrombotic Event ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Thrombotic Risk

Introduction. Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) is a unique entity in the 2016 WHO classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms with distinct clinical phenotype and outcome [Guglielmelli P, Blood 2017]. Compared to essential thrombocythemia (ET), pre-PMF is characterized by more pronounced disease manifestations, adverse mutation profile and worse outcome. Previous studies [Rumi E, Oncotarget 2017] showed that patients (pts) with pre-PMF present a risk of vascular events similar to ET. However, no studies performed a comprehensive assessment of risk factors for thrombosis in pre-PMF. The current study aimed to identify risk factors for thrombosis and bleeding in a large series of pre-PMF pts and explore the effectiveness of contemporary prognostic models developed specifically for ET. Patients and Methods. The study included 382 pre-PMF pts, diagnosed by 2016 WHO criteria, referred by 4 Italian Centers. Previously published methods were used to genotype JAK2, MPL, CALR, EZH2, ASXL1, IDH1/2 and SRSF2; a high molecular risk (HMR) category was defined according to Vannucchi A, [Leukemia 2013]. Thrombosis‐free survival (TFS) was determined from diagnosis to the first thrombotic event. Pts were grouped according to the conventional risk stratification system [Barbui T, JCO 2011], IPSET‐thrombosis [Barbui T, Blood 2012] and revised IPSET‐thrombosis [Barbui T, BCJ 2015]. Cox-regression model was used for univariate analysis. Harrell's concordance (C) statistic was calculated to measure the incremental accuracy of multivariable models sequentially adjusted for new predictors of thrombotic risk. A P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. At diagnosis, 65 pts (17%) experienced major thrombotic events which included 35 (9%) arterial and 31 (8%) venous thromboses. With a median follow-up of 6.9 y (range 0.08-32.6), 56 (15%) pts developed an arterial or venous thrombotic event, with a total incidence rate of 1.99% pts/year (pt-y); 30 (8%) were arterial and 28 (7%) venous events with incidence rate of 1.00% pt-y and 0.95% pt-y, respectively. Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) represented the most frequent venous events before/at diagnosis (26%). During the follow-up, 16% and 8% of pts experienced myelofibrotic or leukemic progression, and 105 (27%) died, with incidence rate of 2.05% pt-y, 0.95% pt-y and 3.41% pt-y, respectively. In univariate analysis, factors significant for arterial thrombosis after diagnosis were age >65y (HR 2.88; P=0.005), WBC>10x109/L (HR 2.43; P=0.026), presence of >1 generic CV risk factor (HR 2.16; P=0.047), JAK2V617F (HR 3.35; P=0.027) and HMR status (HR 13.1; P=0.027). Conversely, only history of previous thrombosis (HR 3.06; P=0.005) and previous venous event (HR 5.53; P<0.0001) retained significance for predicting venous thrombosis. Pts were effectively stratified according to IPSET and conventional risk model. The risk of thrombosis in IPSET low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 0.67%, 2.05% and 2.95% pt-y, and 1.47% pt-y and 2.71% pt-y in 2-tiered thrombotic risk model. (Figure 1); in revised-IPSET, 0.54%, 2.23%, 2.44% and 2.69 %pt-y in the very low, low, intermediate- and high-risk category. When WBC>10x109/L or HMR variables were incorporated into IPSET model, the C-statistic increased significantly for the prediction of arterial events: from baseline value of 0.68 to 0.74 adding WBC and 0.91 HMR status. The proportion of pts who experienced major bleeding was 3% prior/at diagnosis,and 7% during follow-up, with total incidence rate of 0.94% pt-y. In univariate analysis, predictors for major bleeding during follow-up were age >75y (HR 3.34; P=0.011), WBC>13x109/L (HR 2.33; P=0.035), presence of >1 generic CV risk factor (HR 2.41; P=0.035), particularly hypertension (HR 2.63; P=0.016) and grade-1 fibrosis (HR 2.28; P=0.05). High platelet count and treatment, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. Overall, this study identified independent risk factors for major thrombosis and bleeding in pre-PMF. Of interest, we report that HMR status predicted for arterial thrombosis during the follow-up. Pre-PMF pts showed remarkably high rate of venous thrombosis, mostly represented by SVT. The 3-tiered IPSET prognostic model for thrombosis reliably predicted occurrence of thrombotic events in pre-PMF and should be considered as standard reference. Figure 1 Disclosures Rumi: novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Thiele:Shire: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Remuneration, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Remuneration; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Remuneration, Research Funding; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vannucchi:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Venous Thromboembolism Following Pegaspargase in Adults Receiving Antithrombin Supplementation: A Single Center Characterization of Risk Factors and an Assessment of Supplementation Practice

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112604 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4023-4023 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Craig W. Freyer ◽

Alex Ganetsky ◽

Mitchell E. Hughes ◽

Tracy M. Krause ◽

Colleen Timlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Additional Patient ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Younger Adults ◽

The Mean

Abstract Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant adverse event in adults receiving pegaspargase (PEG) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). PEG increases VTE risk by depletion of antithrombin III (AT). Heparin requires adequate AT for anticoagulation. Younger adults with T-cell ALL receiving prednisone may be particularly at risk. Retrospective series (most with L-asparaginase) suggest AT supplementation may decrease VTE, however prospective data in adults beyond induction is limited while the optimal dose of AT remains undefined and varies across series. We reviewed adults at our institution who received PEG for ALL to assess the incidence of VTE within our AT supplementation practice. Laboratory and cost data for AT repletion were also analyzed. Methods: Adults who received PEG for ALL between 11/2015 and 7/2018 were retrospectively identified. Institutional recommendations were to supplement AT if serum AT < 60% following PEG for at least the first 2 courses (induction/consolidation). AT levels were assessed twice weekly until normalized. AT supplementation following additional cycles was recommended for all patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation. Pharmacists calculated the AT dose using a repletion factor of 80-120%, rounded to the nearest vial. After VTE, patients received therapeutic enoxaparin throughout all remaining PEG doses, with enoxaparin held only if platelets < 50,000/mcL or for procedures. After 3/2018, all patients receiving PEG also received enoxaparin prophylaxis when platelets >30,000/mcL. A retrospective analysis was done to assess the incidence of VTE. Secondary endpoints included an assessment of VTE risk factors, ability to achieve therapeutic AT levels with supplementation and to characterize drug therapy costs with AT supplementation. Results: Thirty-one patients (30 newly diagnosed, 1 in relapse) with ALL received ≥ 1 dose of PEG followed by AT supplementation. Seventeen of 31 patients were adolescent/young adults (AYA) and 13/31 had T cell ALL. Additional patient characteristics are summarized in table 1. The incidence of VTE was 19%, with 7 VTEs identified in 6 patients. Two patients developed CNS thrombosis (1 fatal), 1 had a pulmonary embolism, and the remainder were upper extremity VTE. Six of 7 VTE occurred during the first two courses at a mean of 66 days (range 6-225) following the first PEG dose. Patients with VTE had a median platelet count of 118/mcL (range 34-377) and a mean AT nadir of 53% (36-98) within 72 hours of VTE. Two of 7 events occurred despite enoxaparin prophylaxis. Five of 6 (83%) patients with VTE had T-ALL; which was more common in the VTE vs. no-VTE group (p = 0.01). The incidence of VTE within the T-ALL group was 38%. Patients with VTE were all AYA and were younger than those without VTE (median 31 vs. 42 years, p = 0.06). Patients with VTE received a higher mean PEG dose than patients without VTE (4589 vs. 3504 units, p < 0.0001), reflective of the more aggressive dosing in the AYA regimen. Six of 7 VTEs occurred during a course containing prednisone (p = 0.08 vs. dexamethasone). AT nadirs during cycles with VTE were similar to cycles without VTE. No clinically significant bleeding occurred. Characteristics of patients with VTE are summarized in table 2. Overall the mean time to AT nadir was 11 days. Therapeutic AT (> 60%) following supplementation occurred 56% of the time. Most AT doses (89%) were calculated with a correction factor of 80-89%. The probability of obtaining a therapeutic AT increased when a higher repletion factor (> 90%) was used (76% vs. 52%, p = 0.06). Patients received a mean of 1.9 (0-6) doses of AT per PEG dose, and a mean of 5.9 (1-21) AT doses throughout treatment. The mean AT supplementation cost per PEG dose was $11,663 with 186 doses administered ($3.22/unit). Conclusions: VTE occurred in 19% of patients receiving AT supplementation following PEG, with 2/7 events involving the CNS. The risk of VTE was greatest in younger adults with T-ALL receiving concurrent prednisone and higher doses of PEG. AT levels were low at the time of VTE in most patients, however nadirs were similar compared to courses not complicated by VTE. Routine or augmented VTE prophylaxis and a higher AT repletion goal (> 90%) may further limit VTE risk but given the cost and patient inconvenience, prospective evaluation is needed to confirm the benefit. Disclosures Frey: Servier Consultancy: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Perl:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; NewLink Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porter:Genentech: Other: Spouse employment; Novartis: Other: Advisory board, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board.

Download Full-text

Mortality from Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4829.4829 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4829-4829 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Michael H. Kroll ◽

Naresh Pemmaraju ◽

Thein H. Oo ◽

Vahid Afshar-Kharghan ◽

Samantha Kroll

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Embolism ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cause Of Death ◽

Inferior Vena ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Time Period ◽

Md Anderson

Abstract Determining the death rate due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) among cancer patients is a daunting task, suffering from methodological constraints associated with death certificates, administrative data bases, surveillance methods and disease recognition. While it is clear that VTE is a clinical marker of a high risk of dying from cancer and that cancer patients are at relatively higher risk of dying from pulmonary embolism (PE), there are large variations in mortality directly attributable to VTE. To examine mortality from venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with cancer, we reviewed the medical records of patients from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) suffering from cancer plus VTE who died during the time period 3/1/2000 and 10/31/2010. A list of all cancer patients at UTMDACC who died during the time period 3/1/2000 through 10/31/2010 and carried one of 18 ICD-9 coded diagnoses of VTE (encompassing deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, inferior vena cava thrombosis and renal vein thrombosis) was provided by the institutional Enterprise Information Warehouse. Among 99,288 patients who died at MD Anderson over the ~ 10 year period, 11,032 had a diagnosis of VTE. The electronic health records (EHR) of 9,000 of these patients were reviewed to determine if death was attributed to VTE. A cause-of-death could be assigned to 1,459 patients and could not be determined for the remaining 7,541. The distribution of malignancies among patients with a defined cause-of-death was 19.8 % - acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (8.3% with acute myelogenous leukemia); 14.2% - lymphoma; 12.5% - genitourinary; 12.5% - lung; 12.4% - gastrointestinal; 7.3% - breast; 4.4% - myeloma; and 17% - other. The attributed cause-of-death for these 1,459 patients was disease progression in 52.8%; infection in 19.7%; VTE in 13.9%; respiratory failure (not due to disease progression or PE) in 7.6%; arterial thrombosis (myocardial infarction, sudden death, stroke or congestive heart failure) in 3.5%; hemorrhage in 1.2%; and other (stem cell transplant-related multiorgan failure, graft-versus-host disease, liver failure, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, thrombotic microangiopathy, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, fall, or suicide) in the remaining 1.3%. Among the 203 patients whose cause-of-death was attributed to VTE, 51 had hematological malignancies (16 acute leukemia, 15 lymphoma, 14 myelodysplastic syndrome or a myeloproliferative neoplasm, 6 myeloma) and 152 were solid tumor patients (39 lung, 34 genitourinary, 26 gastrointestinal, 15 breast, and 37 miscellaneous [melanoma, sarcomas, germ cell and others]). 162 out of 203 patients with death attributed to VTE were receiving anticoagulation and 40 were treated with an inferior vena caval filter. 109/203 had thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150,000/μl), 81 of whom received anticoagulation. 6/81 of the thrombocytopenic patients who died of VTE had bleeding; 3 of these patients had WHO grade 4 bleeding contributing to death. Fatal VTE was documented by objective measures in 83.3% (169 out of 203) and by clinical measures in 16.7% (34 out of 203). Assuming that all clinical diagnoses were wrong, objectively documented VTE directly caused 11.6% of the deaths (169/1459). These results indicate that VTE is a major cause of death among patients with heterogeneous malignancies and suggest that improved treatment of malignancy-associated VTE will have an immediate and significant favorable impact on the survival of cancer patients. Better data are needed to determine the therapeutic index of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in cancer patients, particularly those considered to be at high risk for bleeding. Disclosures Kroll: Boerhinger-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aplagon Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

High Rate of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism Is Children with Sickle Cell Disease and History of VTE: Analysis of the Trinetx Research Network Database

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-154003 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 778-778

Author(s):

Marisol Betensky ◽

Ernest Amankwah ◽

Jane S Hankins ◽

Neil Goldenberg

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Sickle Cell Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Research Network ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

History Of ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is associated with a chronic prothrombotic state that increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The rate of VTE in hospitalized children with SCD is nearly 2%, substantively higher than the 0.2-0.6% rate seen in the general pediatric population. 1-3 The frequency and risk factors associated with the development of recurrent VTE in this population are vastly unknown. This knowledge gap hinders the development of disease-specific guidelines for the management and secondary prevention of VTE in pediatric SCD. Aim: To investigate the frequency of recurrent VTE in children birth to 21 years of age (inclusive) with SCD and history of prior VTE. Methods: We analyzed patient-level data from the TriNetX Research Network Database, a global federated network of electronic medical record (EMR) data from 42 health care organizations. Children ≤21 years of age with a diagnosis of SCD and history of VTE between January 1 2008 to March 31 2021 were included in the analysis. Index VTE was defined as the first diagnosis of VTE in the patient's EMR. Recurrent VTE was defined as an acute VTE diagnosis that occurred 90 days after the index VTE discharge date in a different anatomic location from the index VTE. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized using counts and percentages. Missing values were not imputed. Overall, one year and five-year recurrence VTE are reported with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 119 children with SCD and VTE were included. Table 1 shows the patients baseline characteristics. Mean age at the time of index VTE diagnosis was 16.7 years (standard deviation 5.5 years). The majority of patients were Black (87%) and female (61%). The most frequent index VTE diagnosis was pulmonary embolism (42%) followed by lower (23%) and upper (22%) extremity VTE. Of the 119 patients,10 (8.4%, 95%CI=4-15%) developed recurrent VTE within 1-year and 25 (21.0%, 95%CI=14-29%) developed recurrent VTE within 5-years from index VTE. Compared to patients without recurrent VTE, patients with recurrent VTE were more frequently female (50% vs. 68%, respectively), and slightly older (mean age 16.6 years vs. 17.2 years, respectively). The most frequent anatomic location for VTE recurrence was the upper extremity (32%) Conclusions: This retrospective database analysis identified, for the first time, high rates of recurrent VTE of 8.4% and 21% at 1- and 5-years post-VTE in children with SCD. These rates stand in contrast with the 3% VTE recurrence at 1-year reported for the general pediatric VTE population. 4 Further analyses of the database are ongoing to identify risk factors for recurrent VTE in this population. These initial findings highlight the need for cooperative multicenter prospective studies to reliably establish rates of- and prognostic factors associated with recurrent VTE in children with SCD, in order to generate evidence for disease-specific treatment guidelines, and to inform future prognostically-stratified interventional trials designed to optimize VTE outcomes in pediatric SCD. 1.Kumar R, Stanek J, Creary S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children with sickle cell disease: an administrative database study. Blood Adv 2018;2:285-291. 2. Raffini L, Huang YS, Witmer C, Feudtner C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children's hospitals in the United States from 2001to 2007. Pediatrics 2009;124:1001-8. 3. Setty BA, O'Brien SH, Kerlin BA. Pediatric venous thromboembolism in the United States: a tertiary care complication of chronic diseases. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012;59:258-64. 4. Goldenberg NA, Schulman S, Kittelson JM, et al, Kids-DOTT Trial Investigators and the ATLAS Group. A Six-week versus Three-month Duration of Anticoagulation for Acute Provoked Venous Thromboembolism in Patients < 21 Years Old: Results of the Multinational Kids-DOTT Randomized Controlled Trial. [abstract]. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021; 5 (Suppl 1). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hankins: Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Vindico Medical Education: Consultancy; UpToDate: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Goldenberg: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiici: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Anthos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text