scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Chidamide Combined with Thalidomide, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone (TC2D) As a Novel Oral Quadruplet Regimen for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Initial Results of a Phase IIa, Multicenter Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4761-4761
Author(s):  
Yi Li ◽  
Jingsong He ◽  
Xiaoyan Han ◽  
Gaofeng Zheng ◽  
Enfan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Clinical Trial ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stratified Analysis

Abstract Background Research has demonstrated that histone deacetylase (HDAC) is overexpressed in plasma cells. Panobinostat was the first HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) approved by FDA for the treatment of patients with relapse and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in 2015. Chidamide is an oral subtype-selective HDACi, which was independently developed in China and approved as peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Preclinical findings have demonstrated the anti-myeloma activities of chidamide in vitro and in vivo. Currently, patients are recommended to take bortezomib and/or lenalidomide in first line treatment and might become less sensitive or resistant when disease progressed. Choices are limited for these patients as not all the new agents (i.e., second generation of PIs/ IMiDs, monoclonal antibody, et al.) were covered by insurance in China, which calls for more efficient and economical options. Here we report the initial efficacy and safety of this prospective, phase IIa, multicenter clinical trial with the chidamide based oral quadruplet regimen in patients with RRMM (ChiCTR2000035100). Methods The TC2D regimen (thalidomide 100mg on days 1-28, chidamide 5mg on days 1-24, cyclophosphamide 50mg on days 1-24 and dexamethasone 20mg on days 1,8,15 and 22) was administered to patients with RRMM of a 28-day cycle. In this trial, evaluation of overall response rate (ORR) was based on patients whose response ≥MR and clinical beneficial rate (CBR) was calculated in patients completed at least 3 cycles of TC2D regimen and reached ≥SD in this trial. Results A total of 32 patients were enrolled as of June 30, 2021, with a median age of 63.5 years (range 49-74). iFISH detected high-risk cytogenetics (defined by the presence of del (17p) or p53 mutation, t (4:14), t (14:16), t (14:20), amp (1q)) in 23 patients, and 82% (19/23) of which had unfavorable cytogenetics. All patients were exposed to at least one kind of PIs and/or IMiDs and 75% were double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. 18 patients received 1-3 prior lines and 43% (14/32) were heavily pre-treated (>3 lines). The median number of cycles completed was 3 (range 1-15) and 59% (19/32) patients completed ≥ 3cycles at the cut-off date (Table 1). With the median follow-up of 6 months (range 0.7-19.5), the median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months and the 6-mon PFS rate was 27.5% (Fig1a). Median overall survival (OS) has not reached yet, 6-mon survival rate was 82%, and the estimated 12-month survival rate was 65% (Fig 1b). Study end points were death (8 cases, 25%) and disease progression (24 cases, 75%). Patients who received ≥3 cycles of treatment had a superior median PFS (3.8 vs 1.4 months, P=0.01) than < 3 cycles. Of the 28 patients whose follow-up time more than 3 months, ORR was 25% and CBR was 46.4%, respectively. Better CBR (56.3% vs. 33.3%) and ORR (31.3% vs. 16.7%) were observed in patients who received less than 3 prior lines of therapy, although with no significant statistical difference. Stratified analysis of PFS showed no significant differences in sex, age, clinical classification, cytogenetic risk, prognosis score (DS and ISS staging system), and the status of ASCT. Stratified analysis of OS showed similar results to those associated with PFS. Grade 3/4 adverse events were mainly hematological toxicity (neutropenia 28%, anemia 34%, thrombocytopenia 15.6%), which could be tolerated. Fatigue was reported in 68.8% (22/32) of the patients. The incidence of all-cause infection was 37.5% (12/32). There were no treatment related deaths observed. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report of chidamide-based oral quadruplet regimen for patients with RRMM. The preliminary results suggested excellent efficacy and relatively high safety, and different groups of patients could benefit from treatment with this regimen. A longer treatment period may strengthen this effect. The most common adverse events were hematological toxicity which could be controlled. As we known, choices of treatment are also influenced by physical and emotional impact of hospitalization or frequent hospital visits, which reflects the patient's ability to continue their treatment and quality of life. Hospitalization and intravenous fluids are not involved in this oral quadruplet treatment, which bring far more convenience and could be a cost-effective alternative for patients with RRMM. Updated results will be presented at the following trial. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Pomalidomide–dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of a multi-cohort phase II clinical trial

Leukemia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ailawadhi ◽  
J R Mikhael ◽  
B R LaPlant ◽  
K M Laumann ◽  
S Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Two-Year Follow-up of Investigator-Initiated Phase 1 Trials of the Safety and Efficacy of Fully Human Anti-Bcma CAR T Cells (CT053) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Siguo Hao ◽  
Jie Jin ◽  
Songfu Jiang ◽  
Zonghai Li ◽  
Wenhao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a potential therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. CT053 comprises autologous T cells transduced with a second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) utilizing a fully human BCMA-specific single-chain fragment variant (25C2) with high binding affinity. CT053 was firstly studied in a single-arm, open-label Phase I, investigator-initiated program (NCT03716856, NCT03302403, and NCT03380039) in eastern China. Here we present the 24-month follow-up results of the study. Methods: The multicenter exploratory Phase 1 studies included adult subjects with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had received at least 2 prior lines of myeloma treatment. After preconditioning treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for 2-4 days, 21 subjects received one cycle of 1.5 × 108 T cells CT053 CAR-BCMA T cells. Three subjects respectively received 0.5 × 108, 1 × 108, or 1.8 × 108 cells. The primary objective was subject safety. The secondary objectives were pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Efficacy was assessed according to IMWG 2016 criteria. Results: A total of 24 subjects with a median age of 60.1 years (range, 38.5-69.9) were enrolled from Sept. 10, 2017 to Sept. 22, 2018. The subjects had a median of 4.5 (range, 2-11) prior lines of therapy, and 41.7% (10/24) underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. At baseline, 10 subjects (41.7%) had concomitant extramedullary involvement, 8 subjects (33.3%) had ECOG scores 2-3, and 9 subjects (37.5%) reported ISS Grade III. As of June 30, 2020, 9 subjects completed 24 months of follow-up with responses including 8 stringent complete response (sCR) and 1 complete response (CR). Also, 15 subjects discontinued prior to completing the 24-month follow-up, of whom 13 discontinued due to disease progression (PD), and 2 discontinued for other anticancer therapy. The overall response rate was 87.5% (21/24) including 79.2% (19/24) with complete responses or stringent complete responses (3 CR, 16 sCR). The median duration of response (DOR) was 21.8 months (95%CI: 9.2, not evaluable [NE]). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.8 months (95%CI: 10.1, NE), with 6-month and 12-month PFS rates of 87% and 60.9%, respectively. Thirteen subjects progressed with median PFS of 10.2 months (range, 0.9-23 months): 3 progressed within 6 months, 6 progressed within 6-12 months, and 4 within 12-24 months. Compared to 9 subjects with persistent CR/sCR, the 13 progressed subjects had a higher percentage of ECOG scores 2-3 (46.2% vs 22.2%), ISS Grade III (53.9% vs 11.1%) and high-risk cytogenetics profiles (53.8% vs 33.3%). Rates of concomitant extramedullary diseases were similar, 46.2% and 44.4%, respectively. Hematological toxicities were the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade (G) 3 or higher, including leukopenia (83.3%), neutropenia (85%), lymphocytopenia (79.2%) and thrombocytopenia (20.8%). In general, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred at 1-4 days and resolved in a median 6 days (range, 3-9 days). Low-grade CRS was reported in 15 of 24 (62.5%) subjects. All CRS events (4 G1, 11 G2) resolved within 2-8 days; among them, 9 patients received a low dose of tocilizumab 4-6 mg/kg. One patient experienced G3 neurotoxicity, presenting as epilepsy and accompanied by simultaneous G2 CRS. This patient fully recovered within 3 days after treatment with methylprednisolone, diazepam and sodium valproate. Six patients (25%) experienced 10 cases of treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs), including lung infection (3), gastroenteritis (1), neutropenic infection (1), fever (1) and hematological toxicities (4). By the cutoff date, one subject died of SAE a (bone morrow failure and neutropenic infection) and PD, and seven subjects died of PD. CAR-BCMA T cell expansion was detectable as early as day 1-7 after infusion and reached peak values on day 7-21 with the highest concentration at 4.5×105 copies/µg genomic DNA. Median T cell persistence was 172 days. The longest persistence of CAR-BCMA copies was measured at 341 days and continues. No immunogenicity was detected. Conclusion: These studies demonstrated that CT053 had excellent efficacy in RRMM, showing early, deep and durable response with 21.8 months DOR. CT053 was well tolerated among the subjects. Figure Disclosures Li: CARsgen Therapeutics Co. LtD: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Wang:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment. Xiao:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment. Yuan:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment. Ma:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment.

scholarly journals High efficacy and safety of CD38 and BCMA bispecific CAR-T in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

2022 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyan Tang ◽  
Haisen Yin ◽  
Xinying Zhao ◽  
Dan Jin ◽  
Yan Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T

Abstract Background B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has obtained promising results in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM), while some patients do not response, or relapse in short term after treatment. Combining with anti-CD38 might solve the problem of targeting BCMA alone. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of BCMA and CD38 (BCMA-CD38) bispecific CAR-T cells in R/R MM patients. Methods We did a single-center, single-arm clinical study at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University in China. Patients meeting with the inclusion criteria were administered with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide before CAR-T cells infusion. Response and adverse events were assessed after infusion. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR1900026286). Results First, we found BCMA-CD38 CAR-T cells exhibited enhanced killing effect on BCMA+CD38+ cells in vitro, compared to BCMA CAR-T and CD38 CAR-T cells. We further demonstrated its anti-tumor activity in vivo. Then, we enrolled 16 R/R MM patients for safety and efficacy analyses. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 14 (87.5%) respond to the treatment, including 13 stringent complete response (sCR) and one partial response (PR), while two patients did not respond. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, of the 13 patients who achieved sCR, 76.9% (10/13) did not relapse or progress during follow-up. Relapse occurred in 3 patients (Patient 2, 3 and 4) after achieving sCR. In sum, four patients died, of which one died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome secondary to severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and three died of disease progression or relapse. The 1-year progression-free survival rates was 68.8%. The 1-year overall survival rate was 75.0%. Extramedullary lesions were eliminated in 62.5% (5/8) patients. The most common symptoms after CAR-T infusion were cytopenia (16, 100%), fever (10, 62.5%), fatigue (8, 50.0%) and myalgias (8, 50.0%). Twelve patients (75.0%) were observed with various grades of CRS, of which five patients (31.3%) got serious CRS (Grade ≥ 3). The CAR+ cell expansion levels were associated with the severity of CRS. Transient clonal isotype switch was observed after CAR-T infusion. Conclusion Our results confirm that BCMA-CD38 CAR-T cells therapy is feasible in treating R/R MM patients, with high response rate, low recurrence rate and manageable CRS, which will be a promising treatment option for R/R MM. Trial registration ChiCTR1900026286, registered on September 29, 2019, retrospectively registered, URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43805

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety Profile of Ixazomib-Based Regimens in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Routine Clinical Practice: Real World Data from a Multi-Center Study in China

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5592-5592
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Li Bao ◽  
Zhong-jun Xia ◽  
Kaiyang Ding ◽  
Bingzong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Refractory Diseases

J Li, L Bao, ZJ Xia and KY Ding contributed equally to this study. Background: Based on the promising results shown in the phase 3 trial (TOURMALINE-MM1, NCT01564537) and the China Continuation Study of MM1, the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (ixa) was approved in China in April of 2018, in combination with lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) (IRd), for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Data on the efficacy and safety of ixa-based therapy in Chinese pts with MM in real-life practice is rather limited. A large national, multi-center, real-world study involving 14 centers from different areas of China was performed to investigate the current status of ixa usage in China and to evaluate the efficacy and safety in routine clinical practice. A total of 246 ixa-treated MM pts was enrolled, with 163 (66.3%) RRMM, 60 (24.4%) newly diagnosed MM and 23 (9.4%) pts received ixa as maintenance. Herein, we reported the data of RRMM in this study. Methods: Medical records, including demographics, disease characteristics, treatment regimen and duration, response rate, adverse events (AEs) and survival, of ixa-treated (at least one cycle completed with response evaluation result) RRMM pts were analyzed. Results: A total of 149 evaluable pts (out of 163 RRMM pts) treated from April 2018, to July 2019 were included in analysis. Baseline features and prior treatment are summarized in Table 1. Patients were categorized into MM1 trial-eligible/-ineligible groups according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of MM1 study. Median age was 62 years (range 33 - 87) with 52 (34.9%) ≥65 years. Most pts (75.2%) had ISS stage II-III disease. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (including del 17p, t (4;14), and/or t (14;16)) were detected in 19 patients (21.1%, among 90 patients with FISH results). Fifty-two (34.9%) pts had a ECOG PS ≥2. Overall, ixa-based regimens were used as the 2nd/3rd/4th/≥5th-line therapy in 29.7%, 33.1%, 16.2% and 17.4% of the pts, respectively. Prior treatment included bortezomib (91.9%), len (52.0%) and thalidomide (58.8%). More than half pts (54.7%) were refractory to previous bortezomib treatment, and 32.2% pts were len-refractory. MM-1 trial-ineligible pts had more advanced ISS stage, higher ECOG PS, more severe anemia, more lines of prior therapy and more refractory diseases. Treatment, outcome and survival were listed in Table 2. Ixa-based regimens included IRd in 70 (47.0%) patients, ixa-dex (Id) in 31 (20.8%) patients and Id plus chemotherapeutics/other agents (44, 29.5%; including cyclophosphamide in 14 pts, thalidomide in 12 pts, adriamycin in 6 pts, melphalan in 5 pts and daratumumab in 3 pts) in 20 (33.3%). (Table 2). One patient received stem cell transplantation (SCT) during follow-up. The best confirmed ORR (≥PR) for all 149 patients was 53.7% (80/149), including 28.2% of patients with ≥VGPR and 7.4% with a CR, with a median time to response of 41.5 days. Surprisingly, ixa-based regimens demonstrated efficacy in pts with PI/len refractory diseases, with an ORR and ≥VGPR rate of 44.4% and 19.9% for PI-refractory pts, and an ORR and ≥VGPR rate of 30.6% and 12.2% for len-refractory pts. Pts eligible for MM1 study shown comparable ORR (76.7%) with that reported in MM1 (ORR 78%). No significant difference in response between different ixa-based regimens was observed. The median PFS of the whole cohort, pts with standard/high cytogenetic risks, pts refractory to bortezomib/len and pts eligible/ineligible for MM1 trial was 8.2, 8.2, 6.8, 6.7, 5.9months, not reached and 6.6months respectively. The median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort and every subgroup was not reached. Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3/4, reported in 40 (27.2%) patients, included 10.1% thrombocytopenia, 5.4% anemia, 3.4% diarrhea and 6.0% pneumonia. Only 3 (2.01%) pts had a grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy during follow-up. Discussion and conclusion: Our results show that ixa-based therapy demonstrated good efficacy with limited toxicity for pts with RRMM in real-life clinical practice. Moreover, in pts with PIs- or len- refractory diseases, ixa-based therapy still showed acceptable effectiveness (ORR: 44.4% and 30.6%; mPFS: 6.7 months and 5.9 months). Although 70.5% pts in our real-life cohort were ineligible for MM1 trial, the efficacy and safety profile is similar to that reported in MM1 China Continuation Study. Ixa-based therapy is a reasonable choice for Chinese RRMM pts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Efficacy and safety of a novel vaginal medical device in recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a multicenter clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Murina ◽  
Ciprian Crișan ◽  
Marius Biriș ◽  
Daniela Sîrbu ◽  
Dionisio F. Barattini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bacterial Vaginosis ◽  
Medical Device ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Clinical Trial

PP455 Cost-effectiveness Of Ixazomib-Based Regimen Compared With Bortezomib-Based Regimen In Chinese Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Pei Wang ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Peng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

IntroductionThe treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a common hematological malignancy, remains a great challenge in China, partially due to the limited accessibility to novel agents and inadequate public health insurance coverage. Ixazomib, a novel oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for RRMM in 2018. While bortezomib, a traditional PI, is the recommended agent in the clinical guideline for MM. Here, we compared their costs and effectiveness.MethodsRRMM patients who has received an ixazomib-based regimen (at least 2 cycles) were analyzed. Using a propensity score matching method, we generated a control group of RRMM patients who received the bortezomib-based regimen. The criteria included the number of treatment lines, age, and the revised international staging system stage (R-ISS) which representing the disease stage for myeloma, and paired at a ratio of 1:2 (allowing one control to match multiples). The difference in hospitalization stay, grade 3/4 adverse events rates, overall response rate (ORR), mortality during treatment, and treatment costs was then compared.ResultsNineteen patients received ixazomib and twenty-seven that received bortezomib were included. The ixazomib-group demonstrated a shorter hospital stay (9 days versus 27 days, p < 0.001), lower grade 3–4 adverse events rates (42.1% versus 55.6%, p < 0.001), higher ORR (63.2% versus 48.1%, p = 0.228), and lower mortality rate during treatment (0% versus 7.4%, p = 0.169) than that of bortezomib-group. The ixazomib group had lower total costs (127,620CNY versus 156,424CNY [18,033USD versus 22,103USD], p > 0.05), lower drug costs (98,376CNY versus 103,307CNY [13,901USD versus 14,598USD], p > 0.05), and the lower costs of supportive treatment (5,507CNY versus 14,701 CNY [778USD versus 2,077USD], p < 0.001). Only in terms of self-funded costs, the bortezomib-based regimen was significantly lower (37,127CNY versus 11,521CNY [5,246USD versus 1,628USD], p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared with the bortezomib-based regimen, the ixazomib-based regimen has better therapeutic effects on MM patients while saving costs. Hence, it may be preferable for use in the treatment of RRMM in China.

OP270 Why The Haute Autorité de Santé Rejects the Widespread Use Of “Mini-Bypass”/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass For Obesity In France

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Lafarge ◽  
Denis-Jean David ◽  
Cédric Carbonneil
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Rct ◽  
Nutritional Complications

IntroductionOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become a widespread technique over the last few years in France, without any prior assessment and despite existing controversies among bariatric surgeons. An older bypass technique for treating obesity, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), is available and reimbursed, having been assessed and approved for use in 2005. In 2019, the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) assessed OAGB for the treatment of severe and massive obesity. This assessment, the first in the world, was undertaken for OAGBs carried out with a 200- or 150-centimeter biliopancreatic-limb (BP-limb) length.MethodsA systematic review (SR) of the literature and consultation of a working group consisting of both healthcare professionals (clinician and surgeons) and patients were carried out. The primary aim of our assessment was to determine whether the OAGB technique can replace RYGB. The efficacy and safety profile of OAGB was compared with RYGB in adult patients with massive, severe obesity. Complications and postoperative follow up specific to OAGB were identified.ResultsThe three selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not confirm the superiority or the non-inferiority of OAGB, compared with RYGB, on the selected efficacy endpoints of weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life. Adverse events reported for OAGB included severe nutritional complications and bile reflux that could potentially lead to lower esophageal cancer. In one RCT, the frequency of serious adverse events in the OAGB group was almost two times higher than in the RYGB group.ConclusionsHAS considered that OAGB carried out with a longer (200 centimeter) BP-limb is not a validated technique for the surgical treatment of massive, severe obesity. Thus, it cannot be considered an alternative to RYGB. There were insufficient data available on OAGB performed with a 150-centimeter BP-limb. Thus, HAS recommended undertaking a multicenter RCT to assess the efficacy and safety of OAGB. Patients who have already undergone OAGB should receive the same follow up as patients who have received RYGB, including close monitoring for nutritional complications and lower esophageal cancer and an endoscopic examination five years after surgery.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation Versus Microfracture for Large, Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects in Older Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial and Extended 5-Year Clinical Follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097305
Author(s):  
Hong-Chul Lim ◽  
Yong-Beom Park ◽  
Chul-Won Ha ◽  
Brian J. Cole ◽  
Beom-Koo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cartilage Restoration

Background: There is currently no optimal method for cartilage restoration in large, full-thickness cartilage defects in older patients. Purpose: To determine whether implantation of a composite of allogeneic umbilical cord blood–derived mesenchymal stem cells and 4% hyaluronate (UCB-MSC-HA) will result in reliable cartilage restoration in patients with large, full-thickness cartilage defects and whether any clinical improvements can be maintained up to 5 years postoperatively. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A randomized controlled phase 3 clinical trial was conducted for 48 weeks, and the participants then underwent extended 5-year observational follow-up. Enrolled were patients with large, full-thickness cartilage defects (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade 4) in a single compartment of the knee joint, as confirmed by arthroscopy. The defect was treated either with UCB-MSC-HA implantation through mini-arthrotomy or with microfracture. The primary outcome was proportion of participants who improved by ≥1 grade on the ICRS Macroscopic Cartilage Repair Assessment (blinded evaluation) at 48-week arthroscopy. Secondary outcomes included histologic assessment; changes in pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score from baseline; and adverse events. Results: Among 114 randomized participants (mean age, 55.9 years; 67% female; body mass index, 26.2 kg/m2), 89 completed the phase 3 clinical trial and 73 were enrolled in the 5-year follow-up study. The mean defect size was 4.9 cm2 in the UCB-MSC-HA group and 4.0 cm2 in the microfracture group ( P = .051). At 48 weeks, improvement by ≥1 ICRS grade was seen in 97.7% of the UCB-MSC-HA group versus 71.7% of the microfracture group ( P = .001); the overall histologic assessment score was also superior in the UCB-MSC-HA group ( P = .036). Improvement in VAS pain, WOMAC, and IKDC scores were not significantly different between the groups at 48 weeks, however the clinical results were significantly better in the UCB-MSC-HA group at 3- to 5-year follow-up ( P < .05). There were no differences between the groups in adverse events. Conclusion: In older patients with symptomatic, large, full-thickness cartilage defects with or without osteoarthritis, UCB-MSC-HA implantation resulted in improved cartilage grade at second-look arthroscopy and provided more improvement in pain and function up to 5 years compared with microfracture. Registration: NCT01041001, NCT01626677 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document