scholarly journals Lack of Bmf Facilitates the Selection of Highly Responsive B-Cell Receptor Clones in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1543-1543
Author(s):  
Nicole Maeding ◽  
Daniela Asslaber ◽  
Nadja Zaborsky ◽  
Andreas Villunger ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clonal Selection ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
B Cell Receptor ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of inhibited cell death, increased proliferation and high importance of interactions with the microenvironment e.g. with T-cells or stromal cells. A central effector in this concert is the activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signalling pathway, associated with selection of specific BCR qualities (either autonomous signalling or reactivity to chronic (auto)-antigenic stimuli) and these signals play an essential role in CLL disease development and progression, also evidenced by the clinical success of kinase inbibitors directed at this signal. Mechanisms modulating selection of specific BCR types are ill understood, but since checkpoints during BCR selection in B cells are guarded by the Bcl2 family of proteins it is likely that cell death proteins are also influencing these decisions in CLL. To study the importance of microenvironmental interactions and antigen stimulation Tcl1 tg mice, which develop a murine CLL highly similar to the human disease 1,2, were frequently applied in the past, aiming to overcome the limitations of more or less artificial CLL in vitro culture systems. During clonal evolution of CLL, predominantly unmutated and stereotyped IgVH-11 and IgVH-12 BCRs are selected in Tcl1 tg mice which were shown to be specific for the autoantigen phosphatidylcholine (PtC) 3, however, the detailed mechanisms of clonal selection in CLL are still unclear. Here we propose a role of the BH3-only and pro-apoptotic protein Bmf in clonal selection by eliminating CLL cells expressing highly responsive BCRs. Methods: Tcl1 tg mice were crossed to Bmf knockout (KO) mice and CLL development monitored over time. After establishment of overt leukemia, mice were sacrificed and the overall survival time analysed. Additionally, we performed BCR sequencing, RNA-Seq and phosphoproteomics after 10µg/ml aIgM treatment using mass cytometry (Helios, CyTOF) and flow cytometry. Results: We found that Tcl1 tg Bmf KO mice developed phenotypically unchanged murine CLL but had an earlier onset of disease (Figure 1A) and an altered usage of BCR IgVH genes. While Tcl1 tg mice usually use PtC specific IgVH genes from the VH11 and V12 family, absence of Bmf led to a skewing to non PtC specific IgVH genes, mainly form the VH1 family (Figure 1B). We thus speculated that lack of Bmf favoured the selection of CLL clones with hyper responsive BCRs, when compared to Tcl1 tg mice with functional Bmf. Indeed we could show that after aIgM stimulation Tcl1 tg BmfKO CLL cells showed increased BCR signalling as measured by mass cytometry (Figure 1C), which was also confirmed by conventional flow cytometry (Figure 1D). Importantly, strong BCR stimulation induces cell death in B cells. Indeed, this can be observed in CLL cells from Tcl1 mice. In Tcl1 tumors that are deficient for BMF this cell death induction is not observed, suggesting that loss of Bmf protects from excessive cell death due to strong BCR stimulation. Conclusions: Here we report a novel role of Bmf in the selection of BCR clones in murine CLL. The higher BCR signalling capacity and the skewing of IgVH gene usage in the absence of Bmf indicates that highly responsive BCR clones are more often selected instead of eliminated during clonal selection.. Interestingly, a SNP in the Bmf gene has been reported to be susceptibility locud for CLL, suggesting that low expression of BMF may have similar effects in huma CLL. Indeed, in preliminary analyses, we observed a similar contribution of Bmf in clonal selection and BCR responsiveness in human CLL and decreased resistance to the BCR signalling inhibitor ibrutinib. Therefore our findings might also be important in a clinical context. References: 1. Yan XJ, Albesiano E, Zanesi N, et al. B cell receptors in TCL1 transgenic mice resemble those of aggressive, treatment-resistant human chronic lymphocytic leukemia. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA. 2006;103(31):11713-11718. 2. Hofbauer JP, Heyder C, Denk U, et al. Development of CLL in the TCL1 transgenic mouse model is associated with severe skewing of the T-cell compartment homologous to human CLL. Leukemia. 2011;25(9):1452-1458. 3. Chen SS, Batliwalla F, Holodick NE, et al. Autoantigen can promote progression to a more aggressive TCL1 leukemia by selecting variants with enhanced B-cell receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(16):E1500-1507. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Greil: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Daiichi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Sandoz: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals BAR-Bodies: B-Cell Receptor Antigens As the Targeting Moiety of Antibodies in Substitution for the Variable Region of Heavy and Light Chains

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2940-2940
Author(s):  
Moritz Bewarder ◽  
Lorenz Thurner ◽  
Frank Neumann ◽  
Natalie Fadle ◽  
Evi Regitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
B Cell Receptor ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
Lymphoma Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Chronic antigenic stimulation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) seems to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of B-cell lymphomas. We recently identified ARS2 and LRPAP1 as the autoantigenic targets of the B-cell receptors of approximately 25% of diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) of the ABC type and 45% of mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs), respectively. These BCR antigens can be used to target lymphoma cells in an approach we designated as BAR (B-cell receptor antigens for reverse targeting). The optimal therapeutic format BARs can be integrated in has yet to be found. Since the most established approach to deliver therapeutic payloads to specific targets are antibodies which have well-defined pharmacokinetics, we constructed and tested an antibody like construct (BAR-body) incorporating the DLBCL-BAR ARS2 in substitution for the variable domains of the heavy and light chains. Material and methods To create the ARS2 BAR-body, we exchanged the heavy and light chain variable region sequences of an IgG1 antibody with a sequence of similar length (approximately 120 amino acids) of the ARS2 protein (aa 343 - 466) containing the DLBCL reactive epitope (aa 343 - 375). The construct was assembled in a pCR2.1 vector, then transferred to a pSfi FLAG Tag vector for fusion with the FLAG tag and transfected into HEK293 cells for production. Purification of the BAR-body was performed via anti-FLAG antibody affinity chromatography. The BAR-body was detected by western blot analysis and binding capacity to the ARS2-reactive lymphoma cell lines U2932 and OCI-Ly3 and the not ARS2-reactive control DLBCL cell line TMD8 was assessed by flow cytometry. ARS2 BAR-body induced cytotoxicity of lymphoma cells with an ARS2 reactive BCR was measured by LDH release assays with human PBMCs as effector cells at an E:T ratio of 10:1. Results We cloned, expressed and characterized an ARS2 containing BAR-body incorporating 4 molecules of the lymphoma-reactive epitope of ARS2 resulting in an antibody like construct using a BAR (ARS2) as binding moiety instead of normal variable regions. The ARS2 BAR-body could successfully be cloned and expressed as confirmed by western blot analysis, which showed the construct at approximately 150 kD as was to be expected. The BAR-body bound specifically to the ARS2-reactive lymphoma cell lines U2932 and OCI-Ly3 and did not bind to the DLBCL cell line TMD8, which has a B-cell receptor of different specificity or to lymphoma cell lines of different entities. In LDH release assays with 5 x 104 PBMCs and 5 x 103 lymphoma cells (E:T ratio of 10:1) the ARS2 BAR-body induced PBMC mediated specific lysis of the ARS2 reactive lymphoma cell lines U2932 and OCI-Ly3 but not the control DLBCL cell line TMD8 starting at a concentration of 0,1µg/ml. Cytotoxic effects were dose dependent, reached a maximum of 50% specific lysis at a concentration of 1µg/ml and did not increase at concentrations of 10µg/ml. Conclusion Here, we show that BARs can substitute for the variable domains as binding moiety in antibody like constructs to target the BCR of B-cell lymphomas. Because approaches using their specific cognate antigen for targeting the malignant B cells have an exclusive specificity for the BCR of the malignant clone, they can be expected to be less toxic than the currently available antibody derived therapies targeting B-cells, because they leave normal B-lymphocytes unaffected. By incorporating BARs into the well-known format of an antibody we hope to capitalize on years of experience with this therapeutic format from conducting and interpreting in vivo experiments to the translation of the BAR approach into the clinic. Disclosures Stilgenbauer: Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmcyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals B-Cell Receptor Driven MALT1 Activity Regulates MYC Signaling in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 611-611
Author(s):  
Beiying Dai ◽  
Michael Grau ◽  
Mélanie Juilland ◽  
Pavel Klener ◽  
Elisabeth Höring ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
B Cell Receptor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Bcr Signaling

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell lymphoma characterized by poor prognosis. Recent studies revealed the importance of constitutive B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling in maintaining survival of a subset of MCLs. MALT1 is an essential component of the CARD11-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) complex that links BCR signaling to the nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) pathway. Additionally, MALT1 functions as a protease that cleaves various substrates to promote proliferation and survival. However, its role in the molecular pathogenesis of MCL is unknown. To elucidate the functional role of MALT1 in the biology of MCL, we determined its proteolytic activity in primary MCL cells and in MCL derived cell lines. A large fraction of MCLs displayed constitutive activity of MALT1. This MALT1 activity is driven by constitutive BCR signaling, as we were able to show that RNA interference-mediated knockdown of central components of the BCR cascade abolished MALT1 activity. To gain insights into the functional significance of MALT1 in MCL, we knocked down its expression by different MALT1 shRNAs. Transduction of these shRNAs induced cytotoxicity in models that are characterized by constitutive MALT1 activity, whereas no effect on survival was observable in MCLs without MALT1 activation. To determine if this MALT1 addiction translates into an in vivosetting, we knocked down MALT1 in mouse MCL models and detected a significant inhibition of tumor growth. This indicates that MALT1-activated MCLs are dependent on the function of MALT1. These results were confirmed as pharmacologic inhibition of MALT1 significantly reduced cell viability in MALT1-activated MCLs, implying that MALT1 inhibition might represent a promising therapeutic strategy for MCL patients. To understand which biologic processes are regulated by MALT1 in MCL, we profiled gene expression changes at different time points following MALT1 inhibition. An unbiased gene set enrichment analysis identified various previously described MYC gene expression signatures to be among the top downregulated signatures, suggesting that MALT1 regulates MYC expression. MYC downregulation following MALT1 inhibition or MALT1 knockdown was confirmed at the protein level and various analyses revealed that MALT1 regulates MYC expression posttranslationally by preventing its proteasomal degradation. These results were further confirmed in primary mouse splenocytes, indicating that this novel molecular mechanism of regulating MYC expression is not restricted to MCL. To confirm that MYC is indeed expressed in primary MCLs, we determined MYC expression in 234 primary MCL samples by immunohistochemistry. These analyses revealed that 75 samples (32.1%) displayed an intermediate and 55 samples (23.5%) a high MYC positivity, suggesting that MYC is expressed in a substantial number of primary MCLs. As common alterations such as MYC high-levelamplifications and translocations determined by FISH occurred extremely rarely in our primary MCL samples (1% of samples), it is conceivable that BCR-driven MALT1 signaling is the predominant mechanism of MYC upregulation in MCL. In summary, we report for the first time that a substantial fraction of MCLs is addicted to constitutive MALT1 signaling. Thus, MCLs can be divided based on their MALT1 activation status into two distinct subgroups. We further identified a novel regulatory mechanism of MYC expression by MALT1. Thus, our study provides a strong mechanistic rationale to investigate the therapeutic efficacy in targeting the MALT1-MYC axis in MCL patients. Disclosures Trneny: Janssen Research & Development: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tzankov:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbott: Speakers Bureau.

Distinct Gene Expression Signatures in Patients with Richter's Syndrome and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Prior Exposure to Ibrutinib

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Hanyin Wang ◽  
Shulan Tian ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
Wendy Blumenschein ◽  
Jennifer H. Yearley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell Activation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Upregulated Genes

Introduction: Richter's syndrome (RS) represents transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into a highly aggressive lymphoma with dismal prognosis. Transcriptomic alterations have been described in CLL but most studies focused on peripheral blood samples with minimal data on RS-involved tissue. Moreover, transcriptomic features of RS have not been well defined in the era of CLL novel therapies. In this study we investigated transcriptomic profiles of CLL/RS-involved nodal tissue using samples from a clinical trial cohort of refractory CLL and RS patients treated with Pembrolizumab (NCT02332980). Methods: Nodal samples from 9 RS and 4 CLL patients in MC1485 trial cohort were reviewed and classified as previously published (Ding et al, Blood 2017). All samples were collected prior to Pembrolizumab treatment. Targeted gene expression profiling of 789 immune-related genes were performed on FFPE nodal samples using Nanostring nCounter® Analysis System (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Differential expression analysis was performed using NanoStringDiff. Genes with 2 fold-change in expression with a false-discovery rate less than 5% were considered differentially expressed. Results: The details for the therapy history of this cohort were illustrated in Figure 1a. All patients exposed to prior ibrutinib before the tissue biopsy had developed clinical progression while receiving ibrutinib. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the 300 most variable genes in expression revealed two clusters: C1 and C2 (Figure 1b). C1 included 4 RS and 3 CLL treated with prior chemotherapy without prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with prior ibrutinib. C2 included 1 CLL and 3 RS received prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with chemotherapy. The segregation of gene expression profiles in samples was largely driven by recent exposure to ibrutinib. In C1 cluster (majority had no prior ibrutinb), RS and CLL samples were clearly separated into two subgroups (Figure 1b). In C2 cluster, CLL 8 treated with ibrutinib showed more similarity in gene expression to RS, than to other CLL samples treated with chemotherapy. In comparison of C2 to C1, we identified 71 differentially expressed genes, of which 34 genes were downregulated and 37 were upregulated in C2. Among the upregulated genes in C2 (majority had prior ibrutinib) are known immune modulating genes including LILRA6, FCGR3A, IL-10, CD163, CD14, IL-2RB (figure 1c). Downregulated genes in C2 are involved in B cell activation including CD40LG, CD22, CD79A, MS4A1 (CD20), and LTB, reflecting the expected biological effect of ibrutinib in reducing B cell activation. Among the 9 RS samples, we compared gene profiles between the two groups of RS with or without prior ibrutinib therapy. 38 downregulated genes and 10 upregulated genes were found in the 4 RS treated with ibrutinib in comparison with 5 RS treated with chemotherapy. The top upregulated genes in the ibrutinib-exposed group included PTHLH, S100A8, IGSF3, TERT, and PRKCB, while the downregulated genes in these samples included MS4A1, LTB and CD38 (figure 1d). In order to delineate the differences of RS vs CLL, we compared gene expression profiles between 5 RS samples and 3 CLL samples that were treated with only chemotherapy. RS samples showed significant upregulation of 129 genes and downregulation of 7 genes. Among the most significantly upregulated genes are multiple genes involved in monocyte and myeloid lineage regulation including TNFSF13, S100A9, FCN1, LGALS2, CD14, FCGR2A, SERPINA1, and LILRB3. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ibrutinib-resistant, RS-involved tissues are characterized by downregulation of genes in B cell activation, but with PRKCB and TERT upregulation. Furthermore, RS-involved nodal tissues display the increased expression of genes involved in myeloid/monocytic regulation in comparison with CLL-involved nodal tissues. These findings implicate that differential therapies for RS and CLL patients need to be adopted based on their prior therapy and gene expression signatures. Studies using large sample size will be needed to verify this hypothesis. Figure Disclosures Zhao: Merck: Current Employment. Blumenschein:Merck: Current Employment. Yearley:Merck: Current Employment. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Parikh:Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Torque: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ding:DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

IKZF3 Overexpression Phenocopies Gain-of-Function Mutation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Shanye Yin ◽  
Gregory Lazarian ◽  
Elisa Ten Hacken ◽  
Tomasz Sewastianik ◽  
Satyen Gohil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bcr Signaling ◽  
Experimental Group

A hotspot mutation within the DNA-binding domain of IKZF3 (IKZF3-L162R) has been identified as a putative driver in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, its functional effects are unknown. We recently confirmed its role as a CLL driver in a B cell-restricted conditional knock-in model. IKZF3 mutation altered mature B cell development and signaling capacity, and induced CLL-like disease in elderly mice (~40% penetrance). Moreover, we found IKZF3-L162R acts as a gain-of-function mutation, altering DNA binding specificity and target selection of IKZF3, and resulting in overexpression of multiple B-cell receptor (BCR) genes. Consistent with the murine data, RNA-sequencing analysis showed that human CLL cells with mut-IKZF3 [n=4] have an enhanced signature of BCR-signaling gene expression compared to WT-IKZF3 [n=6, all IGHV unmutated] (p<0.001), and also exhibited general upregulation of key BCR-signaling regulators. These results confirm the role of IKZF3 as a master regulator of BCR-signaling gene expression, with the mutation contributing to overexpression of these genes. While mutation in IKZF3 has a clear functional impact on a cardinal CLL-associated pathway, such as BCR signaling, we note that this driver occurs only at low frequency in patients (~3%). Because somatic mutation represents but one mechanism by which a driver can alter a cellular pathway, we examined whether aberrant expression of IKZF3 could also yield differences in BCR-signaling gene expression. We have observed expression of the IKZF3 gene to be variably dysregulated amongst CLL patients through re-analysis of transcriptomic data from two independent cohorts of human CLL (DFCI, Landau et al., 2014; ICGC, Ferreira et al., 2014). We thus examined IKZF3 expression and BCR-signaling gene expression, or the 'BCR score' (calculated as the mean expression of 75 BCR signaling-associate genes) in those cohorts (DFCI cohort, n=107; ICGC cohort, n=274). Strikingly, CLL cells with higher IKZF3 expression (defined as greater than median expression) had higher BCR scores than those with lower IKZF3 expression (<median) (p=0.0015 and p<0.0001, respectively). These findings were consistent with the notion that IKZF3 may act as a broad regulator of BCR signaling genes, and that IKZF3 overexpression, like IKZF3 mutation, may provide fitness advantage. In support of this notion, our re-analysis of a gene expression dataset of 107 CLL samples (Herold Leukemia 2011) revealed that higher IKZF3 expression associated with poorer prognosis and worse overall survival (P=0.035). We previously reported that CLL cells with IKZF3 mutation appeared to increase in cancer cell fraction (CCF) with resistance to fludarabine-based chemotherapy (Landau Nature 2015). Instances of increase in mut-IKZF3 CCF upon treatment with the BCR-signaling inhibitor ibrutinib have been reported (Ahn ASH 2019). These studies together suggest an association of IKZF3 mutation with increased cellular survival following either chemotherapy or targeted treatment. To examine whether higher expression of IKZF3 was associated with altered sensitivity to ibrutinib, we performed scRNA-seq analysis (10x Genomics) of two previously treatment-naïve patients undergoing ibrutinib therapy (paired samples, baseline vs. Day 220). We analyzed an average of 11,080 cells per patient (2000 genes/cell). Of note, following ibrutinib treatment, remaining CLL cells expressed higher levels of IKZF3 transcript compared to pretreatment baseline (both p<0.0001), whereas no such change was observed in matched T cells (n ranging between 62 to 652 per experimental group, p>0.05), suggesting that cells with high expression of IKZF3 were selected by ibrutinib treatment. Moreover, we showed that ibrutinib treatment resulted in consistent upregulation of BCR-signaling genes (e.g., CD79B, LYN, GRB2, FOS, RAC1, PRKCB and NFKBIA) (n ranging between 362 to 1374 per experimental group, all p<0.0001), which were likewise activated by mutant IKZF3. Altogether, these data imply that IKZF3 mutation or overexpression may influence upregulation of BCR-signaling genes and enhance cellular fitness even during treatment with BCR-signaling inhibitors. We highlight our observation that IKZF3 mutation appears to be phenocopied by elevated IKZF3 expression, and suggest that alterations in mRNA or protein level that mimic genetic mutations could be widespread in human cancers. Disclosures Kipps: Pharmacyclics/ AbbVie, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) - The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; VelosBio: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Other: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory, Research Funding; Ascerta/AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Octernal Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, VelosBio, and Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wu:BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ibrutinib-Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma Undergoes Metabolic Reprogramming Towards Oxphos

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-41
Author(s):  
Krystle Nomie ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Yixin Yao ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Shaojun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
B Cell Receptor ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Oncogenic Pathways

Abstract Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable B-cell lymphoma subtype and constitutive activation of the B-cell receptor pathway is a hallmark of B-cell lymphomas. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical component of the B-cell receptor pathway, and ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily, and oral covalent inhibitor of BTK, was developed to reduce/silence B-cell receptor pathway activity, leading to clinically remarkable anti-tumor activity. In our prior multiple-center Phase II clinical trial, the overall response rate in relapsed/refractory MCL patients was 68% (Wang et al., NEJM, 2013), surpassing the effectiveness of other therapies. Although ibrutinib is extremely efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, the one-year overall survival rate of ibrutinib-exposed patients who relapse is only 22%. Methods Patient primary cells were isolated from MCL patients treated with ibrutinib either prior to treatment or at treatment discontinuation. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed to determine the mutational landscape of ibrutinib resistance. RNA-seq was employed to compare the gene expression profiles between ibrutinib-sensitive and -resistant patient samples. Gene set enrichment analysis was utilized to identify dysregulated molecular pathways associated with the resistant phenotype. The RNA-seq data were then validated with reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analysis of ibrutinib-sensitive and -resistant MCL cell lines. Metabolic assays including the measurement of mitochondria respiration rates with the Seahorse analyzer and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, targeted metabolomics, and ATP analysis. Functional studies targeting this molecular pathway were conducted, including in vitro cell viability and apoptosis assays, as well as in vivo efficacy studies in an ibrutinib-resistant MCL patient-derived xenograft mouse model. Results WES data analysis identified frequent inactivating somatic alterations in ATM, KMT2D, and TP53 in both the ibrutinib-sensitive and -resistant tumors. CDKN2A (5/7, 71%) was frequently deleted, and the deletion was only observed in the ibrutinib-resistant tumors (p = 0.010). The RNA-seq analysis identified a total of 63 protein-coding genes as the most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the ibrutinib-resistant and -sensitive groups, with a fold change of ≥ 2 or ≤ -2 and the false discovery rate (FDR q-value) ≤ 0.01. Among the DEGs, 26 genes were upregulated in ibrutinib-resistant tumors. In addition, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed the marked upregulation of oncogenic pathways including c-MYC, mTOR (mTORC1), Wnt, and NF-ĸb signaling, followed by cell cycle, apoptosis, BCR signaling and DNA repair in the ibrutinib-resistant tumors. Notably, in addition to these oncogenic pathways, the metabolic pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), were significantly enriched in the ibrutinib-resistant tumors (normalized enrichment score > 3 and FDR q-value < 1e-5). In further support of this finding, metabolomics analysis and the measurement of ATP production and mitochondrial respiration indicated that the OXPHOS pathway is the predominant metabolic pathway employed by ibrutinib-resistant MCL cells. To determine the effects of targeting these pathways, OXPHOS was inhibited with a novel electron transport complex I inhibitor (IACS-010759, developed by MD Anderson Cancer Center) in both MCL cell lines and ibrutinib-resistant MCL patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Single agent IACS-010759 treatment at 10 mg/kg oral gavage for 5 consecutive days/week completely prevented tumor growth compared with the vehicle control as shown by measuring tumor volume (n = 5, p < 0.0001) and human β2M levels (n = 5; p < 0.0001) throughout treatment. No apparent toxicities were observed in the IACS-010759-treated MCL PDX mice. Conclusion This current study warrants the exploitation of active cancer metabolic pathways, especially OXPHOS, to improve the clinical outcomes of MCL and additional lymphoma, which is actively being investigated in a Phase I lymphoma clinical trial (NCT03291938). Disclosures Wang: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria.

scholarly journals The Tigit/CD226/CD155 Immunomodulatory Axis Is Deregulated in CLL and Contributes to B-Cell Anergy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3718-3718
Author(s):  
Francesca Arruga ◽  
Andrea Iannello ◽  
Nikolaos Ioannou ◽  
Alberto Maria Todesco ◽  
Marta Coscia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Tcr Signaling ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Blocking Antibodies

Abstract BACKGROUND. T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is an inhibitory receptor expressed on T, NK and NKT cells, sharing structural and mechanistic similarities with PD-1 and CTLA-4. TIGIT competes with CD226, its partner receptor, for the binding to CD155 ligand: signaling triggered upon CD155 binding to CD226 potentiates T cell receptor (TCR) signaling and CD8 + T cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells (positive signaling). On the contrary, concomitant TIGIT expression on the cell surface prevents CD226 activation either by sequestering CD155 or by impeding CD226 homodimerization and phosphorylation (negative signaling). Recently, TIGIT was shown to be expressed on the surface of normal memory B cells, where it could directly act to suppress T cell responses. No data are available on TIGIT or CD226 expression by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. AIM AND METHODS. Our aim was to investigate expression of the TIGIT and CD226 receptors and of the CD155 ligand in a cohort of clinically and molecularly annotated CLL patient samples. To this end, we designed a multiparametric panel of antibodies for flow cytometry and examined expression of the TIGIT/CD226/CD155 axis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from our patient cohort. To investigate the impact of TIGIT/CD226 engagement on B cell responses, purified leukemic B cells were activated either through the B cell receptor (BCR) using an αIgM polyclonal antibody or with CpG oligonucleotide and interleukin 15 (IL-15) to induce proliferation. In selected experiments, we added recombinant human (Rh) TIGIT-Fc or CD155-Fc chimeras and αTIGIT or αCD226 blocking antibodies to interfere with this axis. RESULTS. Surface expression of TIGIT, CD226 and CD155 was evaluated in a cohort of 115 CLL samples and compared to age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. Both TIGIT and CD226 were upregulated on leukemic B cells compared to normal B lymphocytes, while CD155 was expressed at lower levels. A similar trend was observed on CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. High-risk CLLs (unmutated IgV genes, unfavorable cytogenetics and advanced stage) were predominantly TIGIT low and CD226 high, indicating an unbalance towards "positive signaling". Results were confirmed by confocal microscopy analyses on lymph node (LN) biopsies, which showed i) an overall higher TIGIT expression in CLL compared to reactive LNs and ii) among CLL LNs a stronger TIGIT positivity in mutated vs unmutated cases, confirming flow cytometry data. In line with these findings, Richter's syndrome samples and patient-derived xenografts models showed the lowest TIGIT and the highest CD226 levels. We next examined TIGIT axis expression during the follow up of CLL cases who underwent treatment with BTK inhibitor (BTKi). While CD226 levels remained unmodified upon treatment, a sharp decrease in surface TIGIT was detected soon after BTKi initiation. Since TIGIT acts by decreasing TCR signaling to shut down T cell responses, we hypothesized similar functions in B cells. By crosslinking the BCR with an αIgM antibody in a selected cohort of IGHV UM CLL cells, we found that BTK phosphorylation was induced to a lesser extent in TIGIT high compared to TIGIT low samples, suggesting that TIGIT is a marker of CLL cell anergy. Accordingly, interruption of receptors/ligand interactions with RhTIGIT-Fc chimera or with αTIGIT or αCD226 blocking antibodies, modulated BCR signaling capacity. Specifically, in TIGIT high samples, preventing receptor engagement by CD155 increased αIgM-induced BTK phosphorylation; in contrast, in TIGIT low samples, blocking CD155 interaction affected mostly CD226 signaling, thereby depotentiating BCR activation. Similar results were obtained when stimulating CLL cells with CpG/IL-15. Interestingly, we observed a significant upregulation of surface CD226 in CLL cells cultured for 6 days in the presence of CpG/IL-15. CONCLUSIONS. These results show for the first-time expression of TIGIT by CLL cells. Furthermore, they indicate that TIGIT is a marker of CLL cells anergy, whereas activated CLL cells express high levels of CD226. Inhibition of TIGIT binding to CD155 partially restores B cell signaling and activation. Future studies are needed to gain insights on the mechanisms behind its deregulation and to obtain a complete functional characterization of the axis. Disclosures Coscia: AbbVie: Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Gaidano: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Allan: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celegene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Janssen Biotech Inc, TG Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; AbbVie Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, BeiGene, Janssen Biotech Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Ascentage Pharma, Epizyme, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Janssen Biotech Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC: Other: Advisory Committee; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Furman: Oncotracker: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expert testimony; Sunesis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Deaglio: Heidelberg Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Novel Approach to Identify a Putative Leukemia Stem Cell Population in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) and Distinguish Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL from Lymphoid Blast Crisis Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2912-2912
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Gerber ◽  
Lawrence J. Druhan ◽  
David Foureau ◽  
Elizabeth Jandrisevits ◽  
Amanda Lance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Aldh Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Recent evidence supports the clinical significance of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the identification of LSCs in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) has proved challenging, as transplantation studies in immunocompromised mice have yielded conflicting results. The distinction between Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL and lymphoid blast crisis (LBC) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is also controversial. We previously identified a clinically relevant CD34+CD38- population of LSCs with intermediate (int) levels of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity (CD34+CD38-ALDHint) in AML [Gerber, et al. Blood, 2012]. This population was not present in healthy controls and could be distinguished from normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which had higher levels of ALDH activity (CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh). We hypothesized that the same approach could be used to identify a putative LSC population in ALL. Furthermore, in contrast to most cases of AML, the chronic phase CML stem cell was found to reside in the same CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population as normal HSCs [Gerber, et al. Am J Hematol, 2011]. We therefore also hypothesized that the presence of BCR/ABL mutations in the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population might help distinguish LBC CML from Ph+ ALL. Methods: Bone marrow and/or peripheral blood specimens were collected at diagnosis from patients with B cell ALL or LBC CML on an IRB-approved protocol. A total of 7 patients were evaluated: 2 Ph- ALL, 2 Ph+ ALL, and 3 LBC CML patients. CD34+ cells were isolated by magnetic bead and column selection, then analyzed by flow cytometry with respect to CD38 expression and ALDH activity. Sorted cell populations were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for leukemia-specific abnormalities. Polymerase chain reaction was performed on clinical samples to determine the presence of a p190 vs. p210 transcript. Results: All patients harbored an aberrant CD34+CD38-ALDHint population, similar to that previously seen in AML. This population was ≥95% positive for BCR/ABL by FISH in all Ph+ ALL and LBC CML cases. It was similarly positive (≥75%) for other leukemia-specific FISH abnormalities (including trisomy 4, 8, 10, 12, and/or 21) in all four ALL cases, as well as one LBC CML case. Conversely, the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population (which typically contains the normal HSCs) lacked any of the other cytogenetic abnormalities in all of the cases, irrespective of Ph status or a diagnosis of ALL vs. CML. Notably, the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population was negative for BCR/ABL in the Ph+ ALL cases but was >95% positive for BCR/ABL by FISH in the LBC CML cases. The B cell differentiation marker, CD19, was expressed on the CD34+CD38-ALDHint but not the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population in all ALL cases, both Ph- and Ph+. In contrast, CD19 expression was variable in the LBC CML cases. Both Ph+ ALL cases possessed a p190 BCR/ABL transcript, whereas all of the LBC CML cases contained a p210 transcript. Also of note, the CD34+CD38-ALDHint population was persistently detectable in one of the LBC CML patients while in complete remission after induction therapy; that patient subsequently relapsed. Conclusions: An abnormal CD34+CD38-ALDHint population was identified in all cases of B cell ALL and LBC CML. This population is analogous to a previously identified, clinically relevant LSC population in AML and may represent a putative LSC population in ALL. The CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population was normal by FISH in the ALL cases but contained the BCR/ABL mutation in the LBC CML cases, thus permitting distinction between Ph+ ALL and LBC CML (which also differed based on the presence of p190 vs. p210 transcripts, respectively). Additionally, clonal evolution from chronic phase to lymphoid blast crisis CML was apparent, based on the acquisition of additional cytogenetic abnormalities unique to the CD34+CD38-ALDHint population as compared to the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population. The presence of CD19 on the putative LSCs in the four cases of ALL suggest that CD19-directed therapies may target the LSCs and thus may have curative potential in those cases. This assay may serve as a means to evaluate other possible therapeutic targets. Lastly, the detection of the abnormal CD34+CD38-ALDHint population may have utility as a minimal residual disease assay for monitoring response to treatment. These findings warrant validation in a larger patient cohort. Disclosures Gerber: Janssen: Research Funding; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grunwald:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding. Avalos:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Axl Regulates Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Signaling in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Dual Targeting in CLL Therapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 831-831
Author(s):  
Sutapa Sinha ◽  
Justin Boysen ◽  
Charla Secreto ◽  
Steven L. Warner ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Fgfr Signaling ◽  
Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Abstract B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease and represents a significant health problem in the western world. We and others have reported that primary CLL B-cells spontaneously produce increased levels of proangiogenic basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in vitro and that most CLL plasma contains elevated levels of bFGF. However, the precise role of bFGF in CLL pathobiology is not clearly understood. In this study we investigated the functional implication of the FGF/FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling axis in CLL B-cell biology. We have detected expression of FGFR1 and FGFR3 with comparatively higher levels of the latter receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), but no or notably low levels of FGFR2/FGFR4, by flow cytometry and Western blot analyses in primary CLL B-cells. This observation was further supported by detection of FGFR1/FGFR3 transcripts in CLL B-cells by semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Although both FGFR1 and FGFR3 in CLL B-cells remain as constitutively phosphorylated, we found significantly higher levels of phosphorylation on FGFR3 and thus this latter receptor is likely the predominant RTK of the FGFR family in these leukemic B-cells. Of note, in vitro stimulation of FGFRs with recombinant bFGF was unable to increase total phosphorylation on FGFRs from their constitutive basal levels in CLL B-cells. Further analysis using a bFGF neutralizing antibody suggested that FGFR phosphorylation in CLL B-cells is likely independent of bFGF ligation. We then interrogated the mechanism of how FGFRs were being phosphorylated and/or maintained at the observed constitutive levels of phosphorylation in CLL B-cells. Our previous studies established that Axl is a critical RTK in CLL B-cells since it acts as a docking site for multiple cellular kinases/lipase, an observation supported by earlier literatures in human malignancies. Given this, Axl is likely capable of cross talk with other RTKs including FGFRs to regulate FGFR-signaling in CLL B-cells. Therefore, in an effort to determine whether Axl is functionally associated with FGFR, we examined if these two RTKs exist in the same molecular complex in CLL B-cells. Indeed, immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that Axl formed a complex with FGFR3 in CLL B-cells, suggesting that Axl is likely functionally linked to the FGFR signaling. In this regard we found that Axl inhibition, using a high-affinity Axl inhibitor (TP-0903; Tolero Pharmaceuticals), resulted in significant reduction of total FGFR phosphorylation in CLL B-cells. Additionally, siRNA-mediated partial depletion of Axl in CLL B-cells reduced total FGFR phosphorylation. In contrast, inhibition of FGFR phosphorylation using a high-affinity FGFR inhibitor could not alter phosphorylation levels on Axl RTK in CLL B-cells. Together, these findings suggest that Axl has a dominant role in the regulation of FGFR signaling in CLL B-cells. To find out if inhibition of FGFR can induce apoptosis in CLL B-cells we used a specific inhibitor for FGFR (TKI-258; Novartis) to treat CLL B-cells. Here we found a substantial level of apoptosis induction in the leukemic B-cells with a mean LD50 dose of ~2.5 μM. Interestingly, Axl inhibition by TP-0903 induced a robust level of apoptosis in CLL B-cells in the nanomolar dose range with a mean LD50 dose of 0.14 mM. Thus Axl inhibition exerts a very robust cytotoxic effect on CLL B-cell survival likely targeting both Axl and FGFR signaling pathways via Axl inhibition. In conclusion, we have detected expression of constitutively active FGFR1 and 3 in primary CLL B-cells and that inhibition of FGFR signaling induces considerable levels of CLL B-cell apoptosis albeit lower than that observed on Axl RTK inhibition. Interestingly, our findings here suggest that Axl forms an active RTK complex with FGFR and that Axl inhibition modifies FGFR phosphorylation levels. Thus it is likely that Axl RTK can regulate FGFR signaling in the CLL B-cells. In total these observations suggest that the finding of robust induction of apoptosis in CLL B-cells is as a result of targeting two signaling pathways with Axl inhibition: Axl and FGFR. These studies further support investigation of Axl inhibition as a way to develop a more effective and efficient therapeutic intervention for CLL patients. Disclosures Warner: Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kay:Genetech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia B Cells Display IgM and IgD Isotype-Restricted Features That Affect Association with Co-Receptors, BCR Signaling, and Leukemic B-Cell Growth In Vivo

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3124-3124
Author(s):  
Andrea Nicola Mazzarello ◽  
Marcus Dühren-von Minden ◽  
Eva Gentner ◽  
Palash Chandra Maity ◽  
Gerardo Ferrer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Metabolic Activity ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bcr Signaling

Abstract The leukemic cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are highly dependent on B-cell receptor (BCR) mediated signaling. Despite this and the fact that >90% of CLL clones co-express IgM and IgD, the composition and molecular mechanisms regulating BCR signaling regarding the two isotypes and the co-receptors with which they associate is lacking. Here we have addressed these issues. First, using Imaging Flow Cytometry, we evaluated BCR organization on the surface membrane of CLL cells from 11 patients who had participated in a 2H2O-labeling study that determined in vivoCLL B-cell birth rates (BR). We found that in all cases mIgM resided in more and larger surface clusters than mIgD. Also, a statistically significant, direct correlation was observed for IgM density and in vivoCLL-cell BR, with patients exhibiting more recently-divided cells having the highest expression of IgM. This was not the case for IgD. BCR signaling requires co-receptors that can co-localize differently with the two isotypes. Thus, we tested co-localization of stimulatory (CD20) and inhibitory (CD22) co-receptors with mIgM and mIgD, using the proximity ligation assay technique that discriminates 10 to 40 nm distances. Higher IgM:CD20 and lower IgD:CD20 co-localization ratios directly associated with in vivo BR. Conversely, patients whose CLL B cells showed greater IgM to CD22 co-localization ratios had lower BRs. Thus, association of IgM with stimulatory versus inhibitory co-receptors correlated with positive or negative regulation of CLL growth in vivo. Next, we questioned the extent that the observed differences in BCR organization affected the entire clone by measuring a marker of single cell metabolic activity - cell size. IgM and BR associated with entire clonal populations that were skewed toward larger, more active cells. Similarly, high BR CLLs displayed an increased mitochondrial maximal respiration and glycolytic activity and capacity, based on measurements of oxygen consumption rate and extracellular acidification rate, respectively. Since our findings supported a link between IgM- but not IgD-BCRs, growth rate in vivoand clonal metabolic activity, we questioned whether intrinsic, constitutive CLL BCR autonomous signaling differed for these two isotypes. To address this, we examined the signaling capacities of CLL-derived BCRs expressed as IgM or IgD isotypes, while maintaining the original IGHV-D-J and IGLV-J rearrangements. We used B cells that do not express endogenous BCR-related molecules but do express an inducible ERT2- SLP-65 fusion protein which enables examining Ca++influx. All BCRs expressed as IgM effectively mobilized Ca++ without need for an external ligand, indicating autonomous signaling. In contrast, BCRs expressed as IgD did not signal autonomously but required crosslinking with anti-BCR. Thus, only mIgM BCRs naturally transduce a signal in the absence of antigen. To determine the extent that BCR signaling influences clonal activity and in vivoBR, we compared cell size of CLL B cells taken from patients before and after 4 weeks of treatment with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib (iBTK). Ibrutinib had a strong treatment effect on cell activity, reducing overall cell size in 10/11 patients. A comparison of single cell areas for patients with lower (BR = 0.54%) and higher (BR = 1.42%) BRs showed an overall reduction of the median cell size for both cases. Thus, iBTK treatment leads to an equilibration of the cell size profile among the cases differing in BR, indicating that ibrutinib acts proportionally more potently on more metabolically active CLL B cells. Likewise, these findings are consistent with BCR signaling, transduced through BTK, being responsible for the increased cellular activity of aggressive CLL clones. In conclusion, increased mIgM density and proximity of mIgM to stimulatory receptors is linked to greater metabolic activity clones and increased rate of proliferationin vivo. Conversely, proximity of mIgM to inhibitory receptors has the opposite correlations.Moreover, only mIgM carries out autonomous signaling, providing another biologic trait linking all these features. Thus, our data support a tight, isotype-dependent regulation of BCR signaling and its consequences for CLL B cells. Further understanding these mechanisms should help generate novel therapies to modify the quality of BCR-transduced signaling and thus cell fate. Disclosures Barrientos: Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rai:Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chiorazzi:AR Pharma: Equity Ownership; Janssen, Inc: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients with Richter Transformation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1857-1857
Author(s):  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Marcella Tschautscher ◽  
Kari G. Chaffee ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Jose F. Leis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Richter transformation (RT) refers to transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Most studies on the management of RT were either small retrospective series or early phase non-randomized trials before the era of novel agents. The natural history, prognostication and optimal treatment of patients with RT remain undefined. Here we report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of a large series of RT from a single center. Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to non-Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 4/1993 to 4/2018 were identified from the Mayo Clinic CLL database. Clinical characteristics, treatment information and follow-up data were abstracted by chart review. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analysis was done in SAS 9.4. Results: A total of 204 patients with CLL who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years (range 22-85), and 148 (73%) were male. The median time to transformation was 4.7 years (range 0-34.5). Prior to RT, 68 (33.3%) patients received no treatment for CLL, 109 (53.4%) received chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) only, and 27 (13.2%) received at least one novel agent (idelalisib, ibrutinib, or venetoclax) for CLL. The median lines of CLL therapy prior to RT was 2 (range 0-13). The median age at RT diagnosis was 69 years (range 30-88). Pathology of RT was DLBCL and high grade B-cell lymphoma in 193 (94.6%) and 11 (5.4%) patients, respectively. The median LDH was 306 IU/L (range 99-9000). 62/125 (49.6%) patients had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm), and the median PET SUVmax was 13.9 (range 2.9-30.0). 45/131 (34.4%) patients had del(17p) or TP53 mutation, 12 (9.2%) had del(11q), 21 (16.0%) had trisomy 12, 27 (20.6%) had del(13q), and 25 (19.1%) had normal FISH. The CLL and RT were clonally related in 12/21 (57.1%) patients. For the transformed lymphoma, cell of origin by Han's algorithm was germinal center B cell-like (GCB) and non-GCB in 31/100 (31.0%) and 69/100 (69.0%) patients, respectively. EBV was positive in 14/52 (26.9%) patients. The median Ki-67 was 80% (range 10-100). Myc and Bcl-2 were positive by IHC in 31/43 (72.1%) and 83/103 (80.6%) patients, respectively; 27/56 (48.2%) were double-expressors. MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangement was positive by FISH in 18/68 (26.5%), 10/34 (29.4%), and 4/31 (12.9%) patients, respectively; 8/66 (12.1%) were double/triple-hit. The most common first-line treatment (Table 1 notes) of RT was R-CHOP-like regimen (n=114, 65.5%). Other treatments included R-EPOCH-like (n=6, 3.4%), high-intensity chemotherapy (n=15, 8.6%), novel agents (eg, ibrutinib, venetoclax, pembrolizumab; n=19, 10.9%), other chemotherapy (n=12, 6.9%), and palliative therapy (n=8, 4.6%). Response to first-line treatment was CR in 57 (38.0%), PR in 33 (22.0%), SD in 18 (12.0%), and PD in 42 (28.0%) patients. The median OS of the entire cohort after RT diagnosis was 12.0 months. The median OS for patients who received no prior CLL treatment, CIT only or at least one novel agent for CLL were 65.5, 7.3, and 12.0 months, respectively (P<0.0001; Figure 1). Of note, in patients who received CIT only for CLL, ~10% and 60% received high-intensity and R-CHOP/R-EPOCH-like chemotherapy, respectively, as first-line RT therapy. In contrast, in patients who had prior novel agents for CLL, 56% and 26% were treated with novel agents and R-CHOP/R-EPOCH-like chemotherapy, respectively, as first-line RT therapy. Patients with or without del(17p)/TP53 mutation had a median OS of 8.3 and 12.8 months, respectively (P=0.046). Patients who were treated with high intensity chemotherapy, R-CHOP/R-EPOCH-like regimens, novel agents, and other therapies for RT had a median OS of 35.1, 14.4, 10.9 and 6.1 months, respectively (P=0.02; Figure 2). OS comparisons by CLL/RT clonal relationship, double expressor or double/triple-hit status are shown in Table 1, with no significant differences noted. Conclusions: Over two thirds of RT were the non-GCB subtype, and about half were Myc/Bcl-2 double expressors. Patients who developed RT without prior CLL therapies had a significantly better OS. In contrast, patients who had received prior CLL therapies had poor outcomes. Myc/Bcl-2 double expressor and MYC/BCL2/BCL6 double/triple hit status had no impact on OS. Disclosures Kenderian: Humanigen: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kay:Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh:Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ding:Merck: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document