scholarly journals Ixazomib Versus Lenalidomide or Ixazomib and Lenalidomide Combination As Maintenance Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Analysis of a Multi-Center Prospective Study in China

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4766-4766
Author(s):  
Zhe Zhuang ◽  
Ying Tian ◽  
Wei-wei Tian ◽  
Hong Yu ◽  
Dongmei Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Dual Drug

Abstract Background Maintenance therapy (MT) deepens response and prolongs progression free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) after frontline regimens. Ixazomib, a 2 nd generation oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for MT because of the convenience and tolerability. Aims We conducted this prospective multi-center study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ixazomib (I-MT) or Ixazomib plus Lenalidomide (IL-MT) to Lenalidomide (L-MT) as maintenance regimens in NDMM patients. Methods This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and registered (NCT04217967). NDMM patients were enrolled from 10 centers of North China MM Registry since September 2019. After 4 cycles of front-line induction therapy, patients who reached partial response (PR) would receive autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) if eligible, or keep up to 5 cycles of front regimens if ineligible, then start maintenance therapy. Patients did not reach PR would switch to a 2nd-line induction for 2-5 cycles and start MT once PR was achieved. For MT, 4mg of Ixazomib was given on day 1,8,15, and 25mg of Lenalidomide every other day on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in dual drug group were administrated with both Ixazomib and Lenalidomide, dose as listed above. The primary endpoint was PFS from MT. Results A total of 149 patients were enrolled, including 54 in I-MT, 65 in L-MT and 30 in IL-MT. The demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable among three groups at baseline (Table 1), including gender ratio, age, paraprotein isotype, ISS, R-ISS, response status before MT, and ASCT rate. The proportions of patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs), defined as amplification 1q21, deletion 17p, t(4,14) and t(14,16), were comparable. The median follow-up duration since MT was 6.1, 11.1, and 5.9 months in I-MT, L-MT and IL-MT group, respectively. Disease progression developed in 9.3%, 12.3% and 10% (N=5, 8, 3, respectively) patients. The median PFS was not reached (NR) in all groups. Only one death occurred in I-MT group. There were 84%, 72.3% and 83.3% of the patients reached very good partial response (VGPR) or better before MT, while the best response rates rose to 93%, 82.3% and 90% during maintenance. The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy was 18.5% on I-MT, 10.8% on L-MT and 30% on IL-MT. Grade 2 PN occurred in 3, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. The incidence of gastrointestinal events was 11.1%, 1.5% and 20%, respectively. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities was 3.7%, 4.6%, and 3.3%. Infection rates were 7.4%, 6.2% and 3.3%. Skin rashes were more common in lenalidomide containing regimens (3.7%, 7.3% and 6.7%). No drug withdrawal was related to adverse events. Conclusions Due to inadequate access to melphalan and low rate of ASCT in China, there is still a gap of PFS in NDMM patients with those in western countries. We herein design this multi-centered prospective study to evaluate if dual drug MT will further strengthen response and make up the gap. Though the primary endpoint--PFS has not been reached in all treatment groups, dual MT improves response most and is quite tolerable. Figure 1. Baseline Characteristics in three groups. Abbreviations: ISS: international staging system; R-ISS: revised-ISS; HRCAs: high risk cytogenetic abnormalities. sCR: stringent complete remission. CR: complete remission. VGPR: very good partial remission. PR: partial remission. * p ＜ 0.05. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High Rate of Complete Remission (CR) and Upgraded Response with Weekly Maintenance Bortezomib Post Single Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant (PSCT) In Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Results of a Phase II Prospective Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2399-2399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firoozeh Sahebi ◽  
Amrita Krishnan ◽  
Leonardo Farol ◽  
Ji-Lian Cai ◽  
George Somlo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 2399 The quality and depth of response particularly achievement of complete remission (CR) have been associated with significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. Achievement of CR is considered a valid surrogate endpoint for survival in clinical trials for patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a phase II study investigating the role of sequential bortezomib/dexamethasone followed by thalidomide/dexamethasone as maintenance therapy post single autologous PSCT. The objectives were to examine the feasibility, toxicities, CR, PFS and overall survival rates. Within 4–8 weeks of autologous PSCT using melphalan 200mg/m2, pts received weekly bortezomib (bor) at 1.3mg/m2 /wk × 3 weeks with 1 week rest and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/d × 4 d for 6 months, followed by thalidomide (thal) at 50 –200mg/d and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/dx4 d for 6 more months. Single agent thalidomide was then continued until disease progression. Between March 2008 and June 2010, forty-five pts were enrolled. Median age was 54 years (29-71). Median time from diagnosis was 6.1 mo. (3.5 – 145.9). Disease stage at diagnosis; by Salmon-Durie (I/II/III 2/8/34/1 not available) and by ISS (I/II/III 18/14/8/ 5 not available). Pts received prior induction treatment with thal/dex (15), bortezomib based (27) and lenalidomide based regimens (10). Median B2M at enrollment was 1.8 mg/L (1.05 -5.3). Disease status at enrollment included complete remission (CR) (11), very good partial response (VGPR) (11), partial response (PR) (23). Six pts had chromosome 13 abnormalities (1 pt by karyotype and 5 pts by FISH), 2 pts had t 4;14 (one with concurrent ch 17 p del) and 3 pts had complex cytogenetic abnormalities. Results: Forty-five pts have been enrolled and undergone transplant. Five pts were unable to start planned maintenance therapy due to development of grade II or more neuro toxicities (4), and persistent thrombocytopenia (1) after PSCT. Thirty nine pts started maintenance bor/dex within 4–8 weeks of PSCT. One pt is too early for maintenance therapy. Twenty-five pts have completed the planned 6 months of bor/dex. Ten pts stopped bor/dex because of low WBC (2), PN (4), diagnosis of adrenal cancer (1), myocardial infarction (MI) (1), and relapse (2). Six pts are still receiving maintenance bortezomib. With a median F/U of 8.5 mo. (0.2 -24.0) twelve of 44 evaluable pts (27%) have achieved CR post PSCT and 17 of 33 evaluable pts (51%) have achieved CR after bor/dex on an intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Fifteen of 25 pts (60%) who have completed 6 months of bor/dex have achieved CR. Nine of 25 pts (36%) have upgraded their response with bor/dex. Eight pts (24%) could not complete bortezomib due to toxicities. At one year post PSCT fourteen of 28 evaluable pts (50%) remain in CR. Six pts have relapsed of whom 2 died of relapsed myeloma (leptomeningeal disease 1 pt). One pt experienced MI while receiving bortezomib (grade IV). Grade III toxicities have occurred in 17 pts; low platelet (1), asthenia (2), mood alteration (1), GI (severe constipation due to partial bowel obstruction on thalidomide) (1), skin rash (1), hyperglycemia (1), lymphopenia (10), sinus bradycardia (1), elevated triglyceride (1), DVT (1), low phosphate (3), leukopenia (1), edema (1). Sixteen pts had peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade I prior to start of bortezomib. Only 8 pts have developed new PN on the study and all are grade I-II. No patient has experienced grade III-IV PN. Median bortezomib dose is 1.3 mg /m2 per week. Conclusion: Prolonged weekly bortezomib maintenance therapy is well tolerated and can upgrade response post single autologous PSCT with no severe peripheral neuropathy. Fifty one percent of pts have achieved CR and 36% have upgraded their response after six months of bortezomib/dexamethasone therapy suggesting this is an active maintenance strategy post PSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Development and Analysis of a Weighed Prognostic Model in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Xue-Han Mao ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
Yuting Yan ◽  
Jiahui Liu ◽  
Huishou Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Total Score Range ◽  
Prognosis Model

Background and Objective: Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized with significant cytogenetic changes and complex tumor microenvironment, thus patient survival is extremely heterogeneous. Various disease-related or patient-related factors affect the prognosis of patients. This study tried to analyze the prognostic indicators of patients with newly-treated MM, especially explored the prognosis of multiple cytogenetic abnormalities and the ratio of lymphocytes to monocytes (LMR). Additionally, we established a comprehensive prognostic model to help determine the patient prognosis. Methods: After screening, 603 patients of untreated MM from January 2008 to June 2017, with complete baseline indicators were enrolled into the study. By univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, risk factors related to the prognosis of patients were evaluated, and a weighted prognosis model was established to compare the survival differences of patients in each risk stratification. Result: Optimal thresholds of ALC, LWR, NLR and LMR were determined by ROC curve and Youdex index: ALC = 1.415, LWR = 0.325, NLR = 1.935, LMR = 2.95. Survival analysis showed that patients with LMR ≤ 2.95, ALC ≥ 1.415 and LWR ≥ 0.325 had significantly better survival compared with their respective control groups. Cox multivariate analysis showed that among the four indicators, only LMR≤2.95 was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (OS)(Figure 1A). 17p deletion, 1q21 amplification, t (4; 14) / t (14; 16) were define as high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA). Of the 603 patients, about 60% were associated with at least one high-risk cytogenetic event. Among them, the occurrence of cumulative 0, 1, 2, and 3 HRA were 39.6% (239/603), 42.5% (256/603), 16.6% (100/603), and 1.3% (8/603), respectively. There was no significant difference in survival among patients with same number of HRAs. The median OS of patients with 0, 1 and ≥ 2 HRA were not reached, 62.1 months (95% CI, 49.3-74.9) and 30.4 months (95% CI, 24.5-36.3), respectively (p <0.001)(Figure 1B).Final Cox regression model showed that age 65 ~ 74 (HR=1.77, 95%CI, 1.24-2.51, p=0.001), age ≥75 (HR=2.46, 95%CI, 1.69-3.58, p < 0.001), LDH≥247 U/L (HR =1.65, 95%CI, 1.07-2.51, p=0.023), ISS stage III (HR=1.76, 95%CI, 1.24-2.50, p=0.002), LMR≤2.95 (HR=1.53, 95%CI, 1.08-2.18, p=0.017), 1 HRA (HR=1.87, 95%CI, 1.27-2.75, p=0.002) and ≥2 HRA (HR=3.48, 95%CI, 2.22-5.45, p<0.001) are independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. Then weighted risk factors were summed to establish a comprehensive prognosis model, with a total score range of 0-6 points. Accordingly, the whole cohort was divided into low risk (0-1 points, 45.4%), intermediate risk (2 points, 27.9%), high risk (3 points, 19.2%) and ultra-high risk (4-6 points, 7.5 %) groups. The median OS of the four risk groups were 85.8 months (67.1-104.5), 49.0 months (44.7-53.3), 35.4 months (31.3-39.5), and 23.2 months (18.8-27.6), respectively (p<0.001). The C-statistics of this prognostic model is 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71), which is significantly better than the D-S stage (C-statistics = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.50-0.55, p <0.001), ISS (C-statistics = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.57-0.64, p <0.001) and R-ISS stage (C-statistics = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.57-0.63, p <0.001). Bootstrap resampling and calibration curve showed that the model has an accurate predictive effect on both short-term and long-term prognosis of patients(Figure 1C). Conclusion: In our analysis, ALC, LWR, LMR were associated with poor prognosis in NDMM patients, while NLR had no significant prognostic significance. Among the four indicators, LMR≤2.95 was the only independent prognostic factor. In NDMM patients, survival of patients with the same number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were comparable with each other, regardless of whichever combination of HRA. Higher number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with worse prognosis. Cox multivariate analysis showed that, old age (65-74 years old, ≥75 years old), increased LDH (≥247 U/L), decreased LMR (≤2.95), ISS III, 1 HRA and ≥ 2 HRA were independent adverse prognostic factors that affect the OS of MM patients. 4. A comprehensive weighted prognostic model was established with the above factors, which was proved to effectively distinguish different prognosis of patients. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Daratumumab monotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (CENTAURUS)

Leukemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1840-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ola Landgren ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Yael C. Cohen ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Peter Voorhees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
Death Rates ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Current guidelines for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) recommend active monitoring until the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) before initiating treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial. Earlier intervention may delay progression to MM. In CENTAURUS, 123 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk SMM were randomly assigned to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on extended intense (intense), extended intermediate (intermediate), or short dosing schedules. At the prespecified primary analysis (15.8-month median follow-up), the complete response (CR) rates (co-primary endpoint) were 2.4%, 4.9%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively; the co-primary endpoint of CR rate >15% was not met. Progressive disease (PD)/death rates (number of patients who progressed or died divided by total duration of progression-free survival [PFS] in patient-years; co-primary endpoint) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.055 (80% confidence interval [CI], 0.014–0.096), 0.102 (80% CI, 0.044–0.160), and 0.206 (80% CI, 0.118–0.295), respectively, translating to a median PFS ≥24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and =0.0213, respectively). With longer follow-up (median follow-up, 25.9 months), CR rates were 4.9%, 9.8%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. PD/death rates for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.059 (80% CI, 0.025–0.092), 0.107 (80% CI, 0.058–0.155), and 0.150 (80% CI, 0.089–0.211), respectively, again translating to a median PFS ≥ 24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001 for all arms). Twenty-four–month PFS rates were 89.9% (90% CI, 78.5–95.4%), 82.0% (90% CI, 69.0–89.9%), and 75.3% (90% CI, 61.1–85.0%) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that intense dosing maintained target-saturating trough concentrations in most patients throughout weekly, every-2-week, and every-4-week dosing periods. No new safety signals were observed. These data provide the basis for an ongoing phase 3 study of daratumumab in SMM.

A Phase II Study of PS-341 for Patients with High Risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2546-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Emily Blood ◽  
David Vesole ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Natalie Callander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Labeling ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease with a anticipated overall survival (OS) ranging from months to decades. Modest improvements in OS have been made with high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT), but to date prognostic factors have a greater impact on OS than do individual therapies. Patients with adverse risk factors such as elevated beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), plasma cell labeling index, deletions of the long arm of chromosome 13 by metaphase cytogenetics (del 13q) require innovative new treatment strategies. Bortezomib has significant activity in patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM, but its specific role in patients with adverse features has not yet been defined. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed “high-risk” myeloma (B2M ≥ 5.5., PCLI ≥ 1, or del 13q) and adequate organ and functional status were eligible. Patients were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 8 cycles as induction. After induction, patients were scheduled to receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every other week indefinitely. Elective peripheral stem cell mobilization (growth factor alone) was allowed after 4 cycles of bortezomib. Patients relapsing on maintenance schedule were to have the full induction schedule resumed. Responses were by the EBMT criteria but a very good partial response category was included. The primary end-point was the response rate in these high-risk patients (90% power to detect a response rate of 50% or higher). The study decision rule requires that 16 or more responses, among 39 eligible patients, are seen in order to declare this treatment effective. Results: Between March 15, 2004 and March 10, 2005, 44 patients enrolled on study. Among the 43 eligible patients, median age was 63; 51% were male. All patients had high risk disease: del 13q (6/41); plasma cell labeling index ≥1% (16/34); and B2M≥5.5 (34/43). Preliminary response data are available for 18 of the 44 cases enrolled, of which 7 had partial response, 1 had minimal response, 1 had no response, 2 had progressive disease, and 5 were unevaluable. Among those patients completing induction therapy and with response information, the median number of cycles of therapy administered is 5, range (0,8). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher included hyponatremia (9 patients) and diarrhea (6 patients). Mild sensory peripheral neuropathy was common: grade 1, 16 patients; grade 2, 2 patients. Only 1 patient had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. One patient died after receiving 2 doses bortezomib due to heart block and asystole. Two patients had a grade 4, 25 patients had grade 3, and 13 had grade 1 or 2 as the worst grade non-hematologic adverse event. Based on data received by August 1, 2005, 18 patients have gone off study: AEs (2); death (1); progressive disease (9); and other reasons (6). Updated results on the full study population along with FISH data for IgH translocations and deletions of 13q and 17p will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that upfront bortezomib has activity in patients with high-risk MM, but further follow-up is required.

A Prospective Study of Bortezomib in Combination with Melphalan and Prednisone for Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5181-5181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
George P. Keogh ◽  
Jon P. Gockerman ◽  
Mitchell Horwitz ◽  
Joseph O. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
The Usa ◽  
M Spike ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract The standard induction chemotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is a dexamethasone based regimen including dexamethasone alone, VAD, thalidomide+dexamethasone and other combinations. Currently the overall response rate achieved with these regimens is ≤70% and the complete remission (CR) rate is &lt;10%. In order to improve the CR rate for both transplant and non-transplant candidates, other agents and regimens are being explored. Bortezomib (Velcade), a proteasome inhibitor currently approved in the USA and in Europe for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM, has demonstrated an impressive activity in the treatment of myeloma. In relapsed/refractory MM, bortezomib has achieved response rate of 35%, with a median duration of response and overall survival of 14 and 18 months, respectively. Clinical experience in relapsed/refractory MM and in previously untreated patients has suggested that the combination of bortezomib with other anti-myeloma drugs could further improve the results achieved with bortezomib alone. We have recently initiated a prospective study to assess the combination of velcade, melphalan and prednisone (MPV) in patients with previously untreated MM. The primary objectives of this study are toxicity, feasibility and CR rate after 4 cycles. The regimen consisted of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 iv on day 1,4,8,11. melphalan 6 mg/m2 po, and prednisone 60 mg/m2 po given on days 1 through 7 of each cycle. As July 2005, 11 patients have been recruited. The median age is 64 (48–74) and all patients were Durie-Salmon stage IIIA. Nine of the 11 patients have completed ≥2 cycles of therapy, 6 patients have completed all 4 cycles of therapy and 3 patients were withdrawn from study (2 for pneumonia and 1 for grade 3 orthostatic hypotension). The most common adverse events were neuropathy (grade 1–3), neutropenia (grade 1–3), thrombocytopenia (grade1–3), fatigue, and bowel changes. For the 6 patients that have completed all 4 cycles of MPV, the responses were: 2/6 CR (negative SPEP/IFE); 1/6 very good partial remission (VGPR, 90% reduction of M-spike) and 3/6 partial remission (PR, 50% reduction of the serum M-spike). For the 3 patients who have completed only 2 cycles of therapy so far, 1/3 achieved a VGPR and 2/3 achieved a PR. Three patients have proceeded to stem cell collection and all engrafted following high dose therapy. Although experience is still limited and follow-up short, other than 3 patients withdrawn from study, all patients treated with MPV have responded to treatment and 2/6 patients achieved a CR. The best response was observed after cycle 2 in the majority of patients. Stem cell collection and engraftment was successful in all attempts so far. These data indicate that bortezomib combined with a short term alkylating regimen should be further explored as an induction regimen before transplantation in patients with myeloma.

Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib (VELCADE™) in 104 Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least Two Previous Lines of Therapy: Impact of Cytogenetics on Response from a Canadian Cohort.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5118-5118
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Deepa Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE™) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to be safe and efficacious in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) using a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 & 11 of a 21-day cycle. Certain cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis in MM, including deletion 13, t(4;14) and the p53 deletion.(Stewart et al, JCO2005; 23(26):6339–44). Bortezomib has demonstrated the ability to overcome the poor prognosis associated with deletion 13 (Jagannath, JCO2005; 23(16S) 6501). The impact of bortezomib on a broader range of cytogenetic abnormalities, such as t(4;14) has yet to be determined. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, non-randomized, phase 3b study, pts with MM across 13 centres in Canada, who had received at least 2 previous lines of therapy and who were refractory to or had relapsed after their last therapy were enrolled. Pts received up to eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8 & 11. Dexamethasone 20 mg PO was administered on each day of and day after bortezomib administration if the pts either experienced progressive disease after receiving at least 2 treatment cycles of bortezomib or had no change in disease status from baseline after receiving at least 4 treatment cycles of bortezomib. Results: 104 pts were enrolled; the mean age in this cohort was 60.7 years, and 65 (62.5%) were male. Approximately 30% of pts had a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or less at baseline. 71 pts (68.3%) had received prior thalidomide therapy, 32 (30.8%) had received a prior autotransplant and 4 (3.8%) had received prior bortezomib treatment. 74 (71.2%) received 3 or more lines of prior MM therapy. During the study, mean number of bortezomib cycles completed was 4.6 (range, 0–11 cycles), and the number of pts that completed 8 cycles of therapy was 36 (34.6%). 15.2% of pts received dexamethasone at cycle 3 and 19.2% at cycle 5. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on approximately half of the pts. Response data for cycle 5 is currently available for 69/99 (69.7%) of evaluable pts (see Table 1). Overall, 76.9% of the pts experienced Grade 3 & 4 adverse events. Safety profile observed is similar to past trial results with bortezomib. Conclusion: In this large Canadian cohort of extensively pre-treated patients with mulitple myeloma, bortezomib demonstrated good response, consistent with previous studies. Analysis correlating cytogenetic profile and response rate is ongoing and will be available at the time of conference. In addition, a detailed safety analysis and impact of prior treatment on response will be analyzed and made available at the time of conference. Table 1. Response to Bortezomib Category of Response* No. of Patients (%) *Modified SWOG: CR 100% M-protein reduction; R 75–99%; PR 50–74%; MR 25–49%; SD<25%, PD increasing M-protein Any Response (CR + VGPR + PR + MR) 47 (68.1) ---Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) ---22 (31.9) ---Partial Response (PR) + Minimal Response (MR) ---25 (36.2) Stable Disease 10 (14.5) Progressive Disease 12 (17.4)

A Phase III Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in Combination with Melphalan and Prednisone (MPR) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 613-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Martin Kropff ◽  
Robin Foa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 613 Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) is an oral immunomodulatory agent with clinical efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In patients with relapsed/refractory MM, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone improved time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in comparison with dexamethasone alone. In newly diagnosed MM patients, the current study compares the efficacy and safety of melphalan, prednisone and lenalidomide (MPR) with that of MP alone. Methods: Key inclusion criteria were: ≥65 years of age, newly diagnosed and symptomatic MM. 459 patients were randomly assigned to receive MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy or MPR followed by placebo maintenance therapy or MP followed by placebo maintenance therapy (Figure 1). The study induction and maintenance phases were followed by an open label lenalidomide extension and a follow-up phase. All patients received aspirin 100 mg/day as thrombo-prophylaxis. The primary endpoint of the study is progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints are OS, time-to-progression, response rate, time to response, response duration, time-to-next anti-myeloma therapy, safety, quality of life and exploratory assessment of cytogenetic abnormalities. Primary comparison is based on the intent-to-treat population comparing PFS between MPR followed by lenalidomide with MP followed by placebo; secondary comparisons are between MPR followed by lenalidomide and MPR followed by placebo, and between MPR followed by placebo and MP followed by placebo. Results: The first patient was enrolled in February 2007. A pre-planned interim analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety was performed at 50% information. An independent central adjudication committee determined the assessment and timing of progressive disease prior to the interim analysis. At the interim analysis, it was determined by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) that the study had crossed the O'Brien Fleming superiority boundary for the primary endpoint, demonstrating a highly statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients treated with MPR compared with MP as first-line treatment for MM patients. The topline results will be availabel at the time of the meeting. Conclusions: MPR is an effective and safe regimen for front-line use in MM. PFS was significantly improved in patients who received MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance compared with those who received MP followed by placebo maintenance. MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance is a new therapeutic option and can be considered a new standard for patients older than 65 years old. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for first line use in multiple myeloma. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria. Delforge:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kropff:Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Foa:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene: Employment. Herbein:Celgene: Employment. Mei:Celgene: Employment. Jacques:Celgene: Employment. Catalano:Celgene: Research Funding.

Results of the Interim Analysis of the “HUSOM” Trial: Hungarian Study of Maintenance After Rituximab Pretreatment, A Multicentre, Phase III, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Benefit of a Long-Term MabThera (rituximab) Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Advance Follicular Lymphoma After Induction of Response (CR(u) or PR) with a MabThera (rituximab)-Containing First Line Regimen

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2714-2714
Author(s):  
Tamas J. Schneider ◽  
Andras Rosta ◽  
Hajna Losonczy ◽  
Gaspar Radvanyi ◽  
Gyorgy Ujj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance ◽  
Follicular Lymphomas

Abstract Abstract 2714 Background: The addition of immunotherapy–rituximab–to the treatment regimen of follicular lymphomas has led to a significant improvement in therapeutic efficacy. In the mid-2000's, immuno-chemotherapy was approved by European authorities as part of the induction treatment for untreated and relapsed follicular lymphomas followed by maintenance therapy. Data about efficacy and safety of rituximab maintenance following first-line induction with R-CVP or R-CHOP have not been available. Therefore the Hungarian National Working-Group initiated a trial: Hungarian Study of Maintenance after Rituximab Pretreatment. Methods: Between July 2005 and December 2008 126 newly diagnosed patients with follicular lymphoma who had achieved partial or complete remission after induction treatment with either R-CVP or R-CHOP were treated with two years of rituximab maintenance. In this open-label, single-arm study rituximab was administered in standard dose (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks, 12 times in total. Results: 126 patients have been included. Data of 99 patients are available for this interim analysis. Average age of the 30 male (30%) and 69 female (70%) patients were 53.2 (29–80) years. Histological subtypes were grade-1 in 32% of patients, grade-2 in 49%, and grade-3a in 19%. Twenty-eight percent of patients had tumors with size over 7 cm. Sixty-four percent of patients were in the moderate risk group (FLIPI: 1–2) and 36% in the high risk group. Fifty-six percent of patients received R-CVP and 44% R-CHOP induction treatment. After induction 61% achieved complete remission and 39% partial remission. With respect to induction treatment regimen, patients treated with R-CVP 52% showed CR and 48% PR. In patients treated with R-CHOP 75% had CR and 25% had PR. Fourteen patients (37%) in PR converted to CR during or after rituximab maintenance therapy. Three-year OS after initiation of maintenance was 94%, EFS was 84%, and PFS was 88%. With respect to FLIPI, OS rates were 97% and 89% for moderate and high risk groups respectively. Patients treated with R-CHOP achieved significantly better PFS (98% vs. 80%; p=0.0096) and EFS (93% vs. 76%; p=0.0332) than those treated with R-CVP. Patients achieving CR compared to PR showed significantly higher PFS (100% vs. 68 %; p<0.0001) and EFS (95 % vs. 65 %; p<0.0001) values respectively. Safety: Four patients experienced SAEs. Three patients died (due to causes other than lymphoma). Two hepatitis B reactivations occurred. Conclusion: These data confirm that rituximab maintenance is a safe and effective treatment for patients after induction with rituximab based immuno-chemotherapy. Interestingly those patients who were treated with more intense induction regimen R-CHOP and those who achieved a better remission status seemed to have a favorable outcome. Thirty-seven percent of patients receiving rituximab maintenance converted from PR to CR. Therefore these data support the use of rituximab maintenance in 1st line treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Final Results from the Phase IIa Study of the Anti-CXCL12 Spiegelmer® Olaptesed Pegol (NOX-A12) in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2111-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
Anna Maria Cafro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Protein Change

Abstract Background Olaptesed, an L-stereo-isomer RNA aptamer, binds and neutralizes the chemokine CXCL12. By interaction with the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7, CXCL12 is responsible for trafficking and homing of normal and malignant blood cells to the bone marrow. Preclinical studies have shown synergistic activity of CXCL12-targeting and anti-myeloma agents, specifically bortezomib (BTZ). Thus, targeting the myeloma niche may increase treatment efficacy. Aims This open label single arm study was conducted to assess the activity and safety of olaptesed when added to the combination of BTZ and dexamethasone (DEX) in patients with relapsed / refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Twenty-eight relapsed or refractory MM patients (males:females 14:14) were enrolled and treated according to a dose titration design. Olaptesed was administered intravenously at doses increasing from 1 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively, at 1 hour prior to bortezomib administration. During cycles 4 to 8, olaptesed was dosed at the highest individually titrated dose. BTZ (1.3 mg/m2) was given on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 as intravenous injection. Oral DEX (20 mg) was added on the day of and on the day after BTZ administration. Response was evaluated based on the uniform IMWG response criteria (Rajkumar SV et. al. Blood 2011; 117: 4691-5). Plasma cell mobilization was studied after a pilot dose of 1 to 4 mg/kg olaptesed administered to the initial 10 patients before start of the regular treatment regimen. Results From Aug 2012 to Feb 2014 we enrolled 28 patients who had received a median of 2 (range 1-6) lines of prior therapy. Pretreatments were lenalidomide (LEN) in 20, BTZ in 14 and carfilzomib in 1 patient. Ten patients had autologous stem cell transplantations prior to entering this study. The patient population enrolled presented predominantly with advanced disease and with adverse outcome predictors. Ten patients had ISS stage III. High-risk cytogenetics were identified in 9 of the 20 patients (45%) with FISH testing available for t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del17p. Eleven patients were refractory to their last prior treatment, which contained BTZ in 8 cases. After two early withdrawals, 26 patients were available for outcome evaluations. The median number of completed cycles was 8. Progression led to treatment termination in 8 patients. The dose of olaptesed was titrated to 4 mg/kg in all 18 patients treated for 3 or more cycles. The single dose of olaptesed administered to 10 pilot-patients effectively mobilized plasma cells, which increased by approximately 200% for up to 3 days. Based on “best response” of the 26 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 73%: Two patients (8%) achieved a complete response (CR), 6 patients (23%) a very good partial response (VGPR) and 11 patients (42%) a partial response (PR). Minimal response was recorded in 2 patients (8%), 4 patients (15%) had stable disease and 1 patient (4%) progressive disease. In the 9 evaluable patients with high-risk cytogenetics, the clinical responses were similar. The ORR was 67% with VGPR in 3 (33%) and PR in 3 (33%) patients. Of the 14 patients pre-treated with BTZ, 1 had a CR and 8 a PR (ORR 64%). M-protein decreased rapidly from treatment cycle 1 to cycle 4 with a decrease of ≥50% being observed in 15 of the 26 evaluable patients. Figure 1 shows a waterfall plot of the maximum observed decrease in M-protein. Figure 1: Waterfall Plot of Maximum M-Protein Change Figure 1:. Waterfall Plot of Maximum M-Protein Change Median progression-free survival (PFS) of the evaluable population was 6.5 months. It was also 6.5 months in the 9 patients with high-risk cytogenetics and 6.3 months in the 14 patients pre-treated with BTZ (Figure 2). The median follow-up was 6.3 months. Figure 2: Progression-Free Survival Figure 2:. Progression-Free Survival Treatment with olaptesed in combination with BTZ-DEX was safe and well tolerated without any appreciable increase in adverse events. Conclusions A single dose of olaptesed effectively mobilized plasma cells. Olaptesed in combination with BTZ and DEX resulted in an ORR rate of 73% and PFS of 6.5 months. Response rates and PFS were similar in patients with or without high risk cytogenetic features or with or without previous exposure to BTZ. The combination regimen was well tolerated. These findings merit further exploration of this strategy in randomized trials. Disclosures Weisel: NOXXON Pharma AG: Consultancy. Petrucci:Celgene: Honoraria; Jannsen-Cilag: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Leleu:Janssen, Celgene, leopharma, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laurent:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kruschinski:NOXXON Pharma AG: Employment. Dümmler:NOXXON Pharma AG: Employment. Riecke:NOXXON Pharma AG: Employment. Engelhardt:NOXXON Pharma AG: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document