The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE): Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Practices in Acutely Ill Medical Patients.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1762-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Herve Decousus ◽  
Jean-Fran[ccedi]ois Bergmann ◽  
Beng H. Chong ◽  
James B. Froehlich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Elastic Stockings

Abstract Background Despite consensus group recommendations indicating that medical patients should receive appropriate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, prophylaxis practices remain poorly characterized. This analysis of IMPROVE, a prospective study of acutely ill medical patients, describes in-hospital prophylaxis practices prior to the publication of updated VTE prevention guidelines by the American College of Chest Physicians. Methods Patient recruitment began in July 2002. Patients ≥18 years old, and hospitalized for ≥3 days with an acute medical illness are enrolled consecutively. Exclusion criteria are: therapeutic antithrombotics/thrombolytics at admission; major surgery or trauma during 3 months prior to admission; and VTE treatment begun within 24 hours of admission. Results Data were from 4315 patients (32% from USA) enrolled up to 30 June 2004 in 37 hospitals in 11 countries (76% with 3-month follow-up data). Patients are 50% female, median (IQR) age 69 (50–80) years, median length of hospital stay 8 (5–14) days, median weight 68 (58–80) kg, and 40% were immobile for ≥3 days (median length of immobility 7 [4–14] days, including immobility immediately prior to admission). In-hospital VTE prophylaxis was received by 41% of patients (Table 1). Of patients with no risk factors (44%), one risk factor (40%), or ≥2 risk factors (16%), 25%, 49%, and 67% received prophylaxis, respectively. 12% of IMPROVE patients would have been eligible for inclusion in the MEDENOX study. Of these, only 52% received prophylaxis in hospital. Prophylaxis was provided to 6% of patients during the 3-month follow-up period, and continued in 11% of patients after discharge. Conclusions Only 41% of IMPROVE patients received VTE prophylaxis, with considerable variation in types and regimens of prophylaxis used. While MEDENOX showed the benefits of VTE prophylaxis (enoxaparin 40 mg) in acutely ill medical patients, only half of MEDENOX-eligible patients received prophylaxis. Table 1. Use of in-hospital VTE prophylaxis (N=4315) VTE prophylaxis Patients receiving VTE prophylaxis, % ROW, rest of world; *Excluding elastic stockings and aspirin ≥1 type of VTE prophylaxis* 41 LMWH - USA (Q12h, Qd) 7 (5, 1) LMWH- ROW (Q12h, Qd) 31 (29, 2) UFH - USA (Q12h, Q8h) 28 (15, 11) UFH - ROW (Q12h, Q8h) 6 (5, 0) Intermittent pneumatic compression (USA, ROW) 6 (19, 0) Aspirin (USA, ROW) 4 (7, 3) Elastic stockings (USA, ROW) 6 (3, 8)

scholarly journals Contemporary approach to primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism regarding the impact of risk factors on anticoagulation therapy duration

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 249-256
Author(s):  
Nebojsa Antonijevic ◽  
Ljubica Jovanovic ◽  
Valentina Djordjevic ◽  
Ivana Zivkovic ◽  
Miodrag Vukcevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
The Impact

Adequate thromboprophylaxis primarily requires timely detection of reversible and irreversible risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and their categorization. It is important to note that the highest percentage of VTE episodes occur in non-surgical (medical) patients and that VTE develops in a large number of surgical patients upon hospital discharge; this emphasizes the need for adequate VTE prevention in inflammatory diseases, acute medical illness and other medical diseases as well as for prolonging and optimizing the anticoagulant regimen after surgical intervention in the primary VTE prophylaxis. As almost completely unrecognized and neglected major risk factors of VTE in clinical practice, we particularly point out the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure, especially in NYHA functional class III and IV patients with significantly reduced left heart ventricle. It is necessary to raise clinicians? awareness of a potential danger from wrongly and one-sidedly interpreted dyspnea and coughing signs in patients with COPD as typical symptoms of basic respiratory disease as well as from ascribing the signs of disease aggravation in heart failure patients exclusively to cardial status worsening, neglecting the possibility of having unrecognized and untreated pulmonary embolism at issue. Contemporary way of life enhances the development of new VTE risk factors such as traveler?s thrombosis, in particular during long-haul flights as well as in individuals sitting at a computer for prolonged periods (e-thrombosis). Determining and recognizing VTE risk factors, especially those formerly neglected nonsurgical ones and simultaneous presence of multiple risk factors within a given period is required for defining an adequate anticoagulant regimen in primary VTE prophylaxis for surgical and non-surgical (medical) patients.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Practices in Acutely Ill Medical Patients with Either Previous Cancer or Currently Active Cancer: Findings from IMPROVE.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1767-1767
Author(s):  
Beng H. Chong ◽  
Ajay K. Kakkar ◽  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Gordon Fitzgerald ◽  
Frederick A. Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pharmacologic Prophylaxis ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Active Cancer

Abstract Background Patients with previous or current cancer have an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, little data is available on physician’s practices for providing VTE prophylaxis to these patients. The aim of this analysis of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) was to characterize VTE prophylaxis practices in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who had previous cancer or currently active cancer. Methods Patient recruitment began in July 2002. Patients ≥18 years old and hospitalized for ≥3 days with an acute medical illness are enrolled consecutively. Exclusion criteria are: therapeutic antithrombotic agents or thrombolytics at admission, major surgery or trauma during 3 months prior to admission, and VTE treatment within 24 hours of admission. Results Data were from 4315 patients enrolled up to 30 June 2004 in 37 hospitals in 11 countries. 578 (13%) patients had currently active cancer (6% as the primary admission diagnosis). Patients with current cancer, previous cancer only, and no cancer were: 40%, 54% and 51% female, median (IQR) ages 72 (60–79), 77 (64–82) and 66 (47–80) years, median length of hospital stay 9 (5–18), 8 (5–12) and 8 (5–14) days, median duration of immobility 8 (5–19), 5 (4–11) and 6 (4–14) days (including immobility immediately prior to hospital admission). The percentages of patients with current or no cancer who received any pharmacologic prophylaxis were similar (see Table 1). However, aspirin was less likely to be prescribed, and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) more likely to be used in patients with current cancer than in those without cancer. Patients with previous cancer were more likely to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis, with increased use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin, compared with patients without cancer. Conclusions Despite acutely ill medical patients with previous or current cancer having a higher risk for VTE, less than half received VTE prophylaxis, reflecting poor awareness of the benefits of prophylaxis. Physician’s perceptions of bleeding risks in cancer patients may influence prophylaxis practices; patients with current cancer were less likely to receive aspirin, but more likely to receive IPC, than patients without cancer. However, patients with previous cancer were more likely to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis than those without cancer, reflecting recognition by some physicians that these patients have an increased risk for VTE. Table 1. VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with current, previous or no cancer VTE prophylaxis Current cancer (%) n=578 Previous cancer (%) n=266 No cancer (%) n=3471 *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (compared with patients with no cancer); †Some patients received >1 type of prophylaxis; ‡Without concomitant pharmacologic prophylaxis; ES, elastic stockings LMWH 24 24 23 UFH 10 21*** 13 Aspirin 1** 9** 4 Warfarin 0 1 1 Any pharmacologic prophylaxis† 34 46** 37 IPC‡ 7* 5 4 ES‡ 2 3 2

Factors at Admission That Are Predictive of Increased In-Hospital Bleeding in Acutely Ill Medical Patients: Findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 264-264
Author(s):  
Hervé Decousus ◽  
Rainer B. Zotz ◽  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Beng H. Chong ◽  
James B. Froehlich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background Although clinical studies have not shown a significant difference between the risk of bleeding in acutely ill medical patients receiving pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and those receiving placebo, fear of bleeding may lead physicians to withhold pharmacologic prophylaxis for patients who should receive it. We therefore aimed to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for in-hospital bleeding in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients in IMPROVE, an international, observational registry. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years, hospitalized ≥3 days with an acute medical illness have been enrolled consecutively since July 2002. Exclusion criteria: therapeutic antithrombotics/thrombolytics at admission, major surgery or trauma during 3 months prior to admission, and VTE treatment within 24 hours of admission. Patients bleeding immediately before, or at admission were excluded from this analysis. Factors present at admission and associated with increased risk of in-hospital bleeding (defined as major or clinically significant nonmajor [Büller et al. N Engl J Med2003;349:1695–702]) were identified by univariate analysis (p&lt;0.15) and included in a multiple logistic regression model (significant at p&lt;0.05). The model was adjusted for patients’ length of stay in hospital. Results Data were from 5960 patients enrolled up to 31 March 2005 in 49 hospitals (12 countries). In-hospital bleeding occurred in 170 (2.9%) patients: 68 (1.1%) major and 102 (1.7%) clinically significant nonmajor bleeding. Independent risk factors for in-hospital bleeding are shown in the Table. In-hospital prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparin were not independently associated with an increased risk of bleeding when added to the analysis (p=0.51 and 0.38, respectively). In patients with 0, 1, 2 or ≥3 of these risk factors, the incidences of major in-hospital bleeding were 0.1%, 0.4%, 1.2% and 5.2%, respectively. Conclusions In this unselected patient population, the rate of major in-hospital bleeding was low (1.1%) and similar to that in the MEDENOX study (1.0%), a major clinical study of VTE prophylaxis. Factors that we identified will be valuable for predicting the risk of in-hospital bleeding in acutely ill medical patients. Table. Factors predictive of an increased risk of in-hospital bleeding in acutely ill medical patients Factor Odds ratio 95% confidence interval Active gastroduodenal ulcer 5.38 2.90–10.00 Bleeding disorder 4.54 2.02–10.19 Hepatic failure 3.34 1.80–6.19 Serum creatinine &gt;1.5 mg/dL 2.29 1.63-3.21 Current cancer 2.08 1.43-3.03 Central venous catheter 2.00 1.31-3.05 ICU/CCU stay 1.92 1.23-3.02 Immobile ≥ 4 days 1.75 1.24-2.46 Ischemic heart disease 1.57 1.02-2.40

Influence of Perceived Risk Factors for Bleeding on Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Practices in Acutely Ill Medical Patients: Findings from IMPROVE.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 917-917
Author(s):  
Manuel Monreal ◽  
Rainer B. Zotz ◽  
Hervé Decousus ◽  
Beng H. Chong ◽  
Geno Merli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Hepatic Failure ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Cumulative Number ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Pharmacologic Prophylaxis

Abstract Background Acutely ill medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive VTE prophylaxis. However, factors perceived by physicians to increase patients’ risk of bleeding may influence VTE prophylaxis practices. In this analysis from The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE), we examined whether perceived risk factors for bleeding had a significant influence on physicians’ prescribing of in-hospital prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years and hospitalized ≥3 days with an acute medical illness have been enrolled consecutively since July 2002. Risk factors considered were: severe renal failure, known bleeding disorder, hemorrhagic stroke, thrombocytopenia, bacterial endocarditis, active gastroduodenal ulcer, NSAID use, hepatic failure, age, immobility and alcoholism. Factors associated with different prescription rates of prophylaxis compared with rates in patients without these factors were identified and included in a multiple logistic regression model (significance at p&lt;0.05). Results Up to 31 March 2005, 6946 patients were enrolled in 49 hospitals in 12 countries. Pharmacologic prophylaxis was received by 42%, 25%, 16%, and 14% of patients with a platelet count at admission &gt;100, 50–100, 20–50 and &lt;20x109/L, respectively (p&lt;0.0001), and 43%, 39%, 30% and 32% of patients with none, 1, 2 and 3 risk factors for bleeding (p&lt;0.0001). Factors independently associated with a lower/higher prescription rate of heparin-based prophylaxis compared with the risk in patients without these factors are shown in the Table. Conclusions The likelihood that hospitalized acutely ill medical patients receive in-hospital pharmacologic prophylaxis decreases as their platelet count at admission decreases, or their cumulative number of perceived risk factors for bleeding increases. Further studies are needed to determine whether the changes in prophylaxis practices observed in this study are justified. Table. Factors Independently Associated with a Higher/lower Rate of Heparin-based VTE Prophylaxis Factor Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval Age (per 10-year increase) 1.19 1.66–1.22 Immobility (per 10-day increase) 1.03 1.02–1.05 Alcoholism 0.62 0.46–0.83 Thrombocytopenia 0.60 0.48–0.74 Active duodenal ulcer 0.36 0.26–0.52 Hepatic failure 0.34 0.21–0.54

Venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery: Low rates of prophylaxis and high rates of filter insertion

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 1220-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Seddighzadeh ◽  
Urszula Zurawska ◽  
Ranjith Shetty ◽  
Samuel Goldhaber
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Ivc Filters

SummaryPatients who undergo surgery are at a high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). To further define the demographics, comorbidities, and risk factors of VTE in patients undergoing major surgery, we analyzed 1,375 hospitalized non-orthopedic surgery patients in a prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from 183 hospitals in the United States. Extremity edema (67.9%), extremity discomfort (44.9%), and dyspnea (18.9%) were among the most common presenting symptoms among these surgical patients. Compared to medical patients, surgical patients presented with a more occult clinical picture and complained less often of extremity edema (67.9% vs. 73.7%; p=0.0001), extremity discomfort (44.9% vs. 56.4%; p<0.0001), or difficulty walking (6.6% vs. 11.2%; p<0.0001). Immobility within 30 days of DVT diagnosis, prior hospitalization within 30 days of DVT diagnosis, presence of an indwelling central venous catheter, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), and previous smoking were the most common VTE risk factors among surgical patients. Among surgical patients who developed DVT, some form of prophylaxis had been used in only 44%. Once diagnosed with DVT, surgical patients received IVC filters more often than medical patients (20.0% vs. 14.1%; p<0.0001; adjusted OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.17–1.92; p<0.001). In conclusion, VTE prophylaxis remains underutilized in surgical patients. The IVC filter utilization rate in surgical patients is significantly higher than in medical patients. Future studies should focus on devising mechanisms to improve implementation of prophylaxis and investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of IVC filters in surgical patients.

Disease burden and unmet needs for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients in Europe show underutilisation of preventive therapies

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 600-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Welner ◽  
Maria Kubin ◽  
Kerstin Folkerts ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Hanane Khoury
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Medical Inpatients ◽  
Clear Identification

SummaryIt was the aim of this review to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and current practice patterns for VTE prophylaxis among medical patients with acute illness in Europe. A literature search was conducted on the epidemiology and prophylaxis practices of VTE prevention among adult patients treated in-hospital for major medical conditions. A total of 21 studies with European information published between 1999 and April 2010 were retrieved. Among patients hospitalised for an acute medical illness, the incidence of VTE varied between 3.65% (symptomatic only over 10.9 days) and 14.9% (asymptomatic and symptomatic over 14 days). While clinical guidelines recommend pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for patients admitted to hospital with an acute medical illness who are bedridden, clear identification of specific risk groups who would benefit from VTE prophylaxis is lacking. In the majority of studies retrieved, prophylaxis was under-used among medical inpatients; 21% to 62% of all patients admitted to the hospital for acute medical illnesses did not receive VTE prophylaxis. Furthermore, among patients who did receive prophylaxis, a considerable proportion received medication that was not in accord with guidelines due to short duration, suboptimal dose, or inappropriate type of prophylaxis. In most cases, the duration of VTE prophylaxis did not exceed hospital stay, the mean duration of which varied between 5 and 11 days. In conclusion, despite demonstrated efficacy and established guidelines supporting VTE prophylaxis, utilisation rates and treatment duration remain suboptimal, leaving medical patients at continued risk for VTE. Improved guideline adherence and effective care delivery among the medically ill are stressed.

P3850Impact of sex and risk factors for venous thromboembolism on the clinical course of first acute venous thromboembolism. Insights from the PREFER in VTE

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Giustozzi ◽  
S Barco ◽  
L Valerio ◽  
F A Klok ◽  
M C Vedovati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The interaction between sex and specific provoking risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may influence initial presentation and prognosis. Purpose We investigated the impact of sex on the risk of recurrence across subgroups of patients with first VTE classified according to baseline risk factors. Methods PREFER in VTE was an international, non-interventional registry (2013–2015) including patients with a first episode of acute symptomatic objectively diagnosed VTE. We studied the risk of recurrence in patients classified according to baseline provoking risk factors for VTE consisted of i) major transient (major surgery/trauma, >5 days in bed), ii) minor transient (pregnancy or puerperium, estroprogestinic therapy, prolonged immobilization, current infection or bone fracture/soft tissue trauma); iii) unprovoked events, iv) active cancer-associated VTE. Results A total of 3,455 patients diagnosed with first acute VTE were identified, of whom 1,623 (47%) were women. The percentage of patients with a major transient risk factor was 22.2% among women and 19.7% among men. Minor transient risk factors were present in 21.3% and 12.4%, unprovoked VTE in 51.6% and 61.6%, cancer-associated VTE in 4.9% of women and 6.3% of men, respectively. The proportions of cases treated with Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were similar between sexes. Median length of treatment of VKAs was 181.5 and 182.0 days and of DOACs was 113.0 and 155.0 days in women and men, respectively. At 12-months of follow-up, VTE recurrence was reported in 74 (4.8%) women and 80 (4.5%) men. Table 1 shows the sex-specific proportion of recurrences by VTE risk factor categories. Table 1 Major Transient (n=722) Minor transient (n=573) Cancer-associated (n=195) Unprovoked (1965) Women (361) Men (361) OR (95% CI) Women (346) Men (227) OR (95% CI) Women (79) Men (116) OR (95% CI) Women (837) Men (1128) OR (95% CI) One-year follow-up, n (N%)   Recurrent VTE, 21 (6.2) 10 (2.9) 0.46 (0.2; 0.9) 9 (2.7) 12 (5.4) 2.09 (0.9; 5.0) 6 (8.0) 5 (4.5) 0.54 (0.2; 1.9) 38 (4.7) 53 (4.7) 1.03 (0.7; 1.6)   Major bleeding, 6 (1.8) 5 (1.5) 0.83 (0.3; 2.7) 5 (1.5) 1 (0.5) 0.30 (0.1; 2.6) 1 (1.3) 3 (2.7) 2.07 (0.2; 20) 10 (1.2) 15 (1.4) 1.11 (0.6; 2.4)   All-cause death, 37 (10.2) 31 (8.5) 0.82 (0.5; 1.4) 10 (2.9) 14 (6.2) 2.21 (0.9; 5.1) 26 (32.9) 49 (42.2) 1.49 (0.8; 2.7) 33 (3.9) 30 (2.7) 0.66 (0.4; 1.1) Conclusions The proportion of patients with recurrent VTE events after first acute symptomatic VTE provoked by transient risk factors was not negligible during the first year of follow-up during in both women and men. These results may have implications on the decision whether to consider extended anticoagulant therapy in selected patients with provoked events. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo.

Rates of Clinically Apparent Venous Thromboembolism and Death Resulting from Pulmonary Embolism among Unselected Hospitalized Acutely Ill Medical Patients Versus Rates Predicted from Clinical Studies.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1620-1620
Author(s):  
Franco Piovella ◽  
Frederick A. Anderson ◽  
Hervé Decousus ◽  
Gordon FitzGerald ◽  
Jean-François Bergmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Autopsy Series ◽  
Unselected Sample ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Hospital Deaths

Abstract Background Without evidence from autopsies, the majority of deaths resulting from pulmonary emboli (PE) are indistinguishable from deaths due to other cardiovascular diseases. This has led to a gap in perceptions between the benefits and risks of providing venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. In this study, we estimated the incidence of clinically apparent VTE in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients in The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE), and compared this with the expected incidence derived from clinical studies that used autopsy or prospective venographic confirmation of clinically important VTE. Methods Beginning in July 2002, a consecutive, unselected sample of patients who were aged ≥18 years and hospitalized for ≥3 days with an acute medical illness, were enrolled in this observational cohort from 49 hospitals in 12 countries. Up to 31 March 2005, 6946 patients were enrolled. Results Based on autopsy series of all-cause in-hospital deaths reported in the literature, PE is associated with 10% of deaths, is the primary cause in 5%, and is clinically recognized as the primary cause in 1.5% of deaths. A review of clinical studies with mandatory venography resulted in predicted rates of 10% for all VTE and 1% for clinically recognized (confirmed) VTE. In IMPROVE, there were 4/291 (1.4%) deaths due to clinically recognized PE (vs. 4 predicted). There were 79 (1.1%) treated VTE events (vs. 69 predicted). Conclusions Observed rates of death due to PE and clinically recognized VTE in a real-world setting are consistent with predictions from clinical study data. Physicians should be aware of the significant gap that exists between clinically important and clinically evident VTE events. Reliance on the low rates of clinically recognized events to assess the seriousness of this disease can lead to a significant under-estimation of its impact on public health and a consequent failure to realize the proven benefits of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients.

scholarly journals Risk assessment and prevention of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients: Results of the regional multicenter study

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-40
Author(s):  
A. B. Sugraliyev ◽  
Sh. S. Aktayeva ◽  
Sh. B. Zhangelova ◽  
S. A. Shiller ◽  
Zh. M. Kussymzhanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Pharmacological Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Introduction. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major public health issue that is frequently underestimated. The primary objective of this multicenter study was to identify patients at risk for VTE, and to define the rate of patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis in the regions of Kazakhstan.Materials and methods. Standardized case report forms were filled by trained medical doctors on one predefined day in selected hospitals. Data were analyzed by independent biostatistician. Risk of VTE was categorized according to Caprini score which was recommended by 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines.Results. 432 patients from 4 regions of Kazakhstan; 169 (39.10%) medical patients and 263 (60.9%) surgical patients were eligible for the study. Patients were at low (10%), moderate (19.2%), high (33.6%) and very high risk (37.3%) for VTE. The main risk factors (RF) of VTE among hospitalized patients were heart failure (HF), obesity, prolonged bed rest, and the presence of acute non-infective inflammation. From total number of hospitalized patients with RF with indications to VTE prophylaxis, 58.1% of patients received pharmacological prophylaxis and only 24.6% of them received VTE prophylaxis according ACCP. On the other hand, 23.5% patients with the risk of VTE but who were not eligible for it received pharmacological prophylaxis.Conclusion. These results indicate the existence of inconsistency between eligibility for VTE prophylaxis on one hand and its application in practice (p < 0.001). Risk factors for VTE and eligibility for VTE prophylaxis are common, but VTE prophylaxis and guidelines application are low.

scholarly journals Development of pulmonary embolism in a nonhospitalized patient with COVID-19 who did not receive venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (23) ◽  
pp. 1957-1960
Author(s):  
Ellen M Uppuluri ◽  
Nancy L Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Young Patient ◽  
Lower Lobe ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Thrombotic Complications

Abstract Purpose Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with thrombotic complications such as stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE), and VTE prophylaxis for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is recommended. However, extended postdischarge VTE prophylaxis and VTE prophylaxis for nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 are not routinely recommended due to uncertain benefit in these populations. Summary Here we report development of a pulmonary embolism (PE) in a young patient without other VTE risk factors who was treated for COVID-19 in an emergency department (ED) and discharged home without VTE prophylaxis, which was consistent with current recommendations. The patient presented to the ED 12 days later with complaints of chest pain for 1 day and was found to have a PE within the segmental and subsegmental branches of the left lower lobe. Conclusion This case suggests that nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 may be at higher risk for VTE than patients with other medical illnesses and warrants further research into the risk of VTE in outpatients with COVID-19.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document