Prognostic Significance of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Children with High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia(ALL) A Children’s Oncology Group Study.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 85-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Borowitz ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
W. Paul Bowman ◽  
Eric Larsen ◽  
Jeanette Pullen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Intrathecal Methotrexate ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Select Group ◽  
Drug Induction

Abstract MRD is known to be an important prognostic factor in childhood ALL. In POG 9906 we studied a select group of 271 patients with NCI high risk precursor B-ALL further defined by an age/sex/WBC algorithm (Shuster et al. Cancer Res Therapy Control9:101,1999) to select those at highest risk; historical data suggested that patients selected by this algorithm would account for about 12% of patients and have a 44% 4y EFS. Patients with Ph+ ALL or favorable genetics (TEL-AML1 translocation or trisomies 4 and 10) were excluded. All patients received 4-drug induction with vincristine, prednisone, L-asparaginase and daunomycin, plus intrathecal methotrexate, and consolidation with cyclophosphamide, ara-C and 6-MP followed by 2 cycles of interim maintenance and delayed intensification similar but not identical to so-called “augmented BFM”. MRD was measured in peripheral blood on day 8 (PB) and in bone marrow at day 29 (BM) by 4-color flow cytometry as previously described (Leukemia17:1566,2003). BM MRD data were available on 240 patients, and PB data on 243. At cutoffs of 1%, 0.1% and .01%, MRD in BM was associated with increased relapse rate (p=.0002). At a cutoff of .01%, 83/240 (35%) patients were MRD positive; these had 3 y EFS of 58±6% compared to 79±5% for MRD negative patients (p=.0008). The EFS of the 28 patients with MRD >1% was 44±14%. There were numerous (25/52) extramedullary events, mostly in CNS. MRD predicted 17/27 marrow relapses but only 8/25 other relapses (p=.03). Overall, 21% of MRD positive patients (>.01%) had a marrow relapse compared to 6% of MRD negative ones. Day 8 PB MRD was also prognostic, with the 49 MRD negative patients having a 3 y EFS of 89±6% compared to 70±5% for the 194 patients with MRD >.01% (p=.008). End induction BM MRD is a strong prognostic factor even among patients with especially high risk ALL and is a better predictor of marrow than of extramedullary relapse. Absence of MRD in day 8 PB identifies a subgroup of approximately 20% of these high risk patients who have an exceptionally good EFS, particularly given their very poor expected outcome. EFS by Day 28 Marrow MRD EFS by Day 28 Marrow MRD

Single Immunophenotypical Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease before Autotransplantation of Non-Cryopreserved Bone Marrow Is Insufficient for Prediction of Outcome in High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439
Author(s):  
Beata M. Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
Krystyna Jagoda ◽  
Aleksandra M. Holowiecka-Goral ◽  
Tomasz Czerw ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract For high-risk adult ALL patients alloHCT is a preferable option. However, a significant proportion of those not having a suitable donor may be successfully treated with autotransplantation (autoHCT). Based on our experience this treatment ensures low transplant related mortality below 3% and a reasonable overall survival and disease free survival of 60% and 45% respectively. The status of the disease before transplantation is an important factor for long term results. In childhood ALL most studies suggest that the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction evaluated immunophenotypically or with bio-molecular methods is predictive for outcome after different treatments including chemotherapy, alloHCT and autoHCT. The results in adult ALL are more controversial. Patients selection. Among 1205 haematopoetic cell transplantations performed in our institution 224 (147 autologous, 77 allogeneic) were performed in 205 adults with ALL. For this study we selected an uniform group of 81 patients fulfilling following criteria’s: Ph (-) ALL, status CR1, evaluable MRD, strictly defined autoBMT procedure performed until the end of 2003. Methods. MRD was tested before autoBMT (median interval 10 days) using 2 ore 3-color flow-cytometry, as appropriate. The atypical immunophenotypes were evaluated using the “quadrans” analysis in all cases and since 2002 also the “empty spaces” technique. The sensitivity equals at least 0.0001. For all autoHSCT bone marrow was used as a source of stem cells. The CAV conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg on d. -3, -2, cytarabine 2 g/m2 d. -3, -2, -1, etoposide 800 mg/m2 d. -3, -2. Bone marrow was not cryo-preserved after collection but stored in 40 C and re-transplanted after 72h. Results. In 41 patients; age med. 26 y (15–53), F/M=12/29, the MRD level was <0,001: the MRD (−) group. In 40 patients; age med. 29 y (16–53), F/M=18/22, the MRD was detected at the level =/> 0,001; MRD+ group. The ALL-immunophenotypes of MRD−/MRD+ groups were as follows; proB 4/7, preB 2/6, Common 18/19, B 0/1, preT 5/2, T 12/1). The interval from DGN to BMT was similar in both groups. The probability of LFS and OS at 10y calculated with median follow up time of 5y equaled; in the MRD(−) group 47% and 62% and in the MRD+ one 48% and 57% respectively (p=ns). The main reason of failure in both groups was a relapse which occurred after a median time of 277 days in the MRD(−) group and 134 days in MRD+ one (p=0.19). Conclusion and comment. Based on this observation we conclude that a single evaluation stratifying patients before autoBMT according to MRD level below or above 0.001 is not predictive for DFS and OS, because it informs only about the current amount of the disease but not about its opportunistic nature. In this respect a repeatedly confirmed MRD positivity should be more significant. Taking into consideration that the main reason of failures were relapses, this finding suggests also that in patients with chemotherapy-responsive ALL confirmed by stabile CR, the myeloablative CAV regimen is sufficiently strong to eliminate the residual disease at the level ranging 0.01–0.001. It may be speculated only that the 72h lasting incubation of bone marrow product before re-transplantation has also some kind of purging effect for leukemic blasts.

Importance of Minimal Residual Disease Testing During the Second Year of Therapy for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 704-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn M. Marshall ◽  
Michelle Haber ◽  
Edward Kwan ◽  
Ling Zhu ◽  
Daniella Ferrara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Maintenance Chemotherapy ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose: A high level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an indicator of relative chemotherapy resistance and a risk factor for relapse. However, the significance of MRD in the second year of therapy is unclear. Moreover, it is unknown whether treatment intervention can alter outcome in patients with detectable MRD. Patients and Methods: We assessed the prognostic value of MRD testing in bone marrow samples from 85 children at 1, 12, and 24 months from diagnosis using clone-specific polymerase chain reaction primers designed to detect clonal antigen receptor gene rearrangements. These children were part of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, which, in the second year of treatment, compared a 2-month reinduction-reintensification followed by maintenance chemotherapy with standard maintenance chemotherapy alone. Results: MRD was detected in 69% of patients at 1 month, 25% at 12 months, and 28% at 24 months from diagnosis. By univariate analysis, high levels of MRD at 1 month, or the presence of any detectable MRD at 12 or 24 months from diagnosis, were highly predictive of relapse. Multivariate analysis showed that MRD testing at 1 and 24 months each had independent prognostic significance. Intensified therapy at 12 months from diagnosis did not improve prognosis in those patients who were MRD positive at 12 months from diagnosis. Conclusion: Clinical outcome in childhood ALL can be predicted with high accuracy by combining the results of MRD testing at 1 and 24 months from diagnosis.

Adaptation of Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (ABFM) Therapy in Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4342-4342
Author(s):  
Michael Rytting ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Treatment Delays ◽  
Early Evaluation ◽  
Drug Induction

Abstract Comparisons of survival of adolescents up to age 21 years of age treated on either pediatric or adult ALL protocols so far show improved survival for patients (pts) treated with pediatric therapies. ABFM therapy has been shown to be effective therapy for teen-aged pts up to age 21, and is the standard therapy arm of the current Children’s Oncology Group high-risk ALL trial. We have initiated a trial of ABFM based therapy for pts up to the age of 30 with lymphoblastic leukemia. Pts receive four drug induction with prednisone 60 mg/m2 daily for 28 days, daunorubicin 25 mg/m2 weekly for four doses, vincristine 2 mg weekly for four doses, and a single dose of intravenous pegylated asparaginase (PEG-asp) in week one of therapy. Intrathecal (IT) cytarabine is given on day one, and IT methotrexate is given on days 8 and 29. IT therapy is intensified depending on the presence of spinal fluid blasts. Induction is extended by two weeks for patients who do not acheive a bone marrow morphologic remission (MR) by day 29. Pts that are in MR by day 15 are rapid early responders; they receive one phase of delayed intensification. Pts who are not in MR by day 15 but enter MR by day 29 or 42 are slow early responders; they receive two delayed intensifications. Upon completion of induction, pts continue with intensive phases of chemotherapy for approximately 6 months. They then start 24 months of maintenance therapy. 13 patients with newly diagnosed ALL have been enrolled with a planned enrollment of 80. The median age is 20 (range 14–28). 10(77%) have pre-B ALL and 3(23%) have T-ALL. 12(92%) are rapid early responders. All pts are in MR by day 29. Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is evaluated at day 29 and day 84 by four-color flow cytometry. 8(62%)pts are MRD negative by day 29. All pts so far are MRD negative by day 84. One pt has relapsed. There are no treatment related deaths. Treatment delays for bone marrow suppression are common. There has been 1 allergic reaction to PEG-asp and 2 cases of clinical pancreatitis. 2 pts have had stroke-like symptoms with MRI findings compatible with treatment toxicity; complete clinical resolution has occurred in both. 4 pts have had grade (Gr) 3–4 hyperglycemia. 2 pts have had Gr 3–4 hyperbilirubinemia. 2 patients have been non-compliant. One pt has had Gr 4 sepsis. Other infectious complications are not common. Early evaluation indicates that ABFM therapy is effective in inducing rapid MR in young adults with ALL. The regimen appears tolerable, but morbidity is frequent. Gr 3–4 toxicity occurs more often than recently reported for similar therapy in adults with ALL (Douer D, et al. Blood, 1 Apr2007, 2744050).

Difference in Outcome of Adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Enrolled in Pediatric (AIEOP) and Adult (GIMEMA) Protocols.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1954-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Testi ◽  
Maria Grazia Valsecchi ◽  
Valentino Conter ◽  
Marco Vignetti ◽  
Francesca Paoloni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cranial Radiotherapy ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Drug Induction ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Progress in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) has led to better survival rates; however, children have had a greater benefit from improved treatment modalities than adolescent who show an overall lower event-free survival (EFS) compared to younger patients. Some differences in the clinical and biologic characteristics of adolescents compared to childhood ALL may partly account for the different outcome, but adolescents treated on pediatric ALL trials seem to have a significantly better EFS than those treated on adult trials. We retrospectively compared the results obtained in a series of 245 patients ranging in age from 14 to 18 years diagnosed and enrolled in specific Italian children and adult ALL trials, between 4/1996 and 10/2003. One hundred and fifty patients, from 30 pediatric centers, underwent the childhood AIEOP ALL 95 and 2000 protocols; the other 95, from 28 adult centers, were enrolled in the GIMEMA ALL 0496 and 2000 protocols. The AIEOP 95 and 2000 trials are BFM-like protocols with a 7 drug induction followed by risk-modulated post-remission therapy that includes high-dose MTX and reinduction for low and intermediate groups, and intensive blocks (high-dose MTX and cytarabine) for high-risk patients. Standard maintenance therapy is administered up to a total of 2 years. Cranial radiotherapy is limited to high-risk patients. Stem cell transplantation is planned for very high-risk patients. The GIMEMA regimens are instead based on an induction with high-dose anthracyclines (cumulative dose 550 mg/m2), high-dose cytarabine as consolidation and do not include high-dose MTX and the reinduction phase. Standard maintenance with vincristine + daunorubicin/cyclophosphamide pulses is given for 2 years. Cranial radiotherapy is administered to all patients. The main patients characteristics at diagnosis, in the two groups under examination, were comparable except for age: median age was 15 and 16 years, respectively in the AIEOP and GIMEMA trials.Poor risk cytogenetic translocations and T-immunophenotype were equally dinstributed. Adolescents in the AIEOP protocols had a higher CR rate (94% vs 89%) and a lower relapse rate (17% vs 45%) compared to the adolescents enrolled in the GIMEMA trials. The 2-year overall survival rate was 80% in the AIEOP protocols and 71% in the GIMEMA trials. Detailed results according to the different clinical and biologic features of the adolescents analyzed will be presented. The results of our comparative study indicate that adolescents enrolled in pediatric trials have a more favourable clinical outcome.

Prognostic Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in Adult Patients with B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by 8-Color Flow Cytometry

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4789-4789
Author(s):  
Xiang-Qin Weng ◽  
Yang Shen ◽  
Yan Sheng ◽  
Bing Chen ◽  
Jing-han Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
B Lineage ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 4789 Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) by immunophenotyping and/or molecular techniques provides a way to precisely evaluate early treatment response and predict relapse. In this study, we have investigated the prognostic significance of MRD in adult patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by 8-color flow cytometry. A cohort of 106 patients with B-ALL who had achieved a complete remission (CR) and at least 1 LAIP characteristics were enrolled to perform MRD assessment at the end of induction and 1 cycle of consolidation. LAIPs were identifiable in 96% of the patients by 8-color flow cytometric assay, in which, most cases (90.6%) containing 2 or more LAIPs had a sensitivity as high as identifying 1 leukemic blast among 1×105 BM nucleated cells. MRD negative status could clearly predict a favorable 1 year relapse free survival (RFS) and 2 year overall survival (OS) when a cut-off level of 0.01% was used to define MRD positivity at the point of achieving CR (P=0.000 and 0.000, respectively) and after 1 cycle of consolidation (P=0.000 and 0.000, respectively), respectively. In multivariate analysis including cytogenetic abnormalities, clinical factors and MRD status, late CR (P=0.046), MRD status at the points of obtaining CR (P=0.016) and 1 consolidation (P=0.007) were associated with RFS independently, while only MRD status after 1 course of consolidation was independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.000). Of note, in exploring the fewer patients with MRD negative status experienced recent relapse, we have identified that most of such patients had a MRD level of 10−4−10−5 comparing to undetectable MRD level. Furthermore, our evidences showed that MRD assessed by flow cytometry and by RQ-PCR assay targeting to BCR-ABL fusion gene yielded concordant results in the vast majority of cases (90%). In conclusion, immunophenotypic evaluation of MRD by 8-color flow cytometry could work as an important tool to assess the treatment response and prognosis precisely in adult B-ALL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Post Induction Minimal Residual Disease Levels Identifies a Group of High Risk Relapsed Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (rALL) with a Favorable Outcome Independent of Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1294-1294
Author(s):  
Catriona Anne Parker ◽  
Marie Reeves ◽  
Sharon Love ◽  
Jeremy Hancock ◽  
Peter M Hoogerbrugge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Post Induction

Abstract BACKGROUND: The determinants of outcome in children with rALL are the duration of first remission (CR1), site of relapse and immunophenotype. High risk (HR) relapses are defined as those occurring with a CR1 of <18 months; B-cell precursor (BCP) with bone marrow (BM) relapse within 6 months of stopping therapy and T-cell BM or combined relapses at any time. All other relapses are defined as standard risk (SR). In the UKALLR3 clinical trial for rALL, HR patients had a lower CR2 rate, higher post induction MRD and inferior survival when compared to SR patients treated in identical fashion. We investigated the effect of further intensifying induction therapy with clofarabine in HR patients. METHODS: Clofarabine was added to the UKALLR3 consolidation block of cyclophosphamide, etoposide (CCE) and used as induction therapy, with dexamethasone and PEG-Asparaginase for HR patients. The previous induction block with mitoxantrone (M) was given as consolidation and all patients were eligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT) with any donor after a third intensification block. The outcomes assessed were improvements in CR2, MRD and progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to historical controls of patients receiving idarubicin (I) or M induction in UKALLR3. A Fleming-style design, based on observed response and toxicity, was incorporated to allow an increase in the dose of cyclophosphamide from 300 mg/m2 to 440 mg/m2. RESULTS: 61, 39 at lower and 22 at the higher dose of cyclophosphamide, CCE patients were compared to 30 I and 69 M patients with HR rALL. Patients in the CCE group had a lower median age at presentation, but other prognostic variables were comparable. CR2 rates of 73%, 83%, 71% and low MRD (≤10-4) was seen in 32%, 0%, 25% of CCE, I and M groups. The higher cyclophosphamide dose was associated with improved CR rates, lower MRD but also increased toxicity levels in CCE compared to M group patients. The proportions of patients reaching transplantation were 43%, 60% and 55% of CCE, I and M patients respectively. 73/82 eligible patients received a SCT, 48 (66%) with matched and 25 (34%) with mismatched donors. The 2-year PFS with CCE, M and I regimens were 17% (11,23), 27% (19,34) and 30% (25,36) respectively (p=0.08). Outcomes of matched sibling, matched unrelated and mismatched SCT were comparable (p=0.9). Seventeen patients with a post induction MRD<10-4, had a 2-year PFS of 63% (50,75), compared to 21% (15,27) for 53 patients with MRD≥10-4 and 21% (17, 25) for the 90 patients with unknown MRD (p=0.005). All 4 patients with MRD≥10-3 prior to SCT and 8/9 not transplanted suffered a second relapse. Overall outcomes of BCP (2-year PFS 21% (15,28)) and T-cell ALL (2-year PFS 26% (16,35)) were comparable (p=0.9). PFS in BCP-ALL was 31% (24,38) and 13% (6,20) (p=0.1) for those receiving M and CCE respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We define two groups of HR rALL patients based on MRD levels attained post induction, independent of the induction regimen. Approximately a quarter of HR patients continue to have chemosensitive disease as evidenced by rapid MRD clearance (<10-4 at week 5). This group includes high-risk cytogenetics and T-cell rALL with MRD as the single discriminatory factor for outcome. These patients have a favorable outcome after SCT with any donor. In the other group (MRD≥10-4) over half of HR patients do not reach SCT primarily due to refractory disease (27%) or disease recurrence (14%). One third of patients relapse post SCT. For this group novel agents and newer treatment strategies are urgently required. Disclosures Off Label Use: Clofarabine 1st relapse childhood ALL.

scholarly journals Clofarabine-Based Chemotherapy for KMT2Ar Infantile Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3406-3406
Author(s):  
Tanja Andrea Gruber ◽  
Deqing Pei ◽  
John Kim Choi ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Elaine Coustan-Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Severe Infections ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Rearrangements in KMT2A (KMT2Ar) are associated with pediatric, adult and therapy-induced acute leukemias. Infants with KMT2Ar acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a poor prognosis, with an event-free-survival (EFS) of 33.6-36.9%. In the context of the remarkable improvements in the treatment of childhood ALL, the dismal outcome of infantile KMT2Ar ALL and the lack of any significant progress for more than two decades are striking . The St. Jude Total Therapy 16 study (the most recently reported study of a program for childhood ALL that begun in 1962) yielded a 5-year EFS of 88.2% overall. Total 16 enrolled all subtypes of newly diagnosed pediatric ALL patients including infants, with intensity of treatment adapted to presenting clinical and genomic features, and early treatment response as determined by minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD). KMT2Ar infants were treated on an intensified high-risk arm and received clofarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CCE) at two points during treatment: Induction days 22-25 and Reinduction I. Infants who lacked KMT2Ar and KMT2Ar patients who were one year of age or older received the same risk-directed treatment plan given to all other patients enrolled on study. A total of 28 patients with KMT2Ar were enrolled on Total 16; the 19 patients &gt; 1 year of age received standard-risk therapy, and the 9 patients &lt; 1 year of age received high-risk therapy on the infant arm with CCE. The probabilities of 5-year EFS and overall survival in KMT2Ar patients &gt; 1 year of age and those &lt; 1 year of age were 73.3% vs. 44.4% (p=0.071) and 84.2% vs. 55.6% (p=0.060), respectively. Six of the nine infants were MRD-positive on Induction day 15 prior to CCE (MRD-positive range, 0.012% to 13.7%; median, 2.13%) with MRD negative status (&lt;0.01%) achieved post CCE in six of the eight patients with data (MRD was 0.011% and 0.07% in the remaining two patients). The trend towards superior outcomes in older KMT2Ar patients was not due to a lower incidence of relapse, as the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 26.7% in patients &gt; 1 year of age and 12.5% for those &lt; 1 year of age (p=0.454). Five infants remain alive (four in CR1, one in CR2), while four expired in CR1. Three deaths were secondary to infection, including a multi-drug resistant soft tissue bacterial infection during Induction days 1-21, a respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia during Reinduction II, and a chronic parainfluenza 3 infection during Continuation weeks 70-101 that led to chronic pneumonitis and interstitial fibrosis. The fourth patient developed grade 5 pulmonary hypertension following induction, a complication potentially compounded by their presenting WBC count of 905 x 10 9/L and pulmonary leukostasis. A comparison of 3-year cumulative risk of selected major toxic effects of treatment revealed that high-risk infants had a lower incidence of asparaginase allergic reactions, osteonecrosis, hyperglycemia, and pancreatitis; in contrast, the incidence of fever and neutropenia, hepatic toxicity and seizures, was similar in high-risk patients regardless of age. Infants had a higher risk of thrombosis (46.7% vs. 23.1%, p&lt;0.001) and of severe infection (70% vs. 19.7%, p&lt;0.001). To further study the contribution of clofarabine to severe infections, we looked at the incidence in high-risk patients &gt; 1 year of age that received one or more clofarabine-containing Reintensification chemotherapy cycles prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant in first remission (CR1). This revealed a higher frequency of infections in infants, suggesting a greater susceptibility to this complication independent from clofarabine exposure (mean number of episodes, 2.39 vs. 1, p&lt;0.001, Poisson regression modeling). In conclusion, treatment of infants with KMT2Ar ALL with chemotherapy including high-intensity clofarabine leads to a lower cumulative incidence of relapse but a higher risk of treatment-related mortality. Severe infections were a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Disclosures Gruber: Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Coustan-Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Nkarta Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Medisix Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Campana: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Medisix Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Juno: Other: patent licensing payments; Juno Therapeutics (a Bristol-Myers Squibb company),: Other: patents on methods for minimal residual disease detection.. Evans: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Emeritus Member (began Jan 2021): Ended employment in the past 24 months; BioSkryb, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Scientific Advisory Board, Chair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pui: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Data Monitoring Committee.

scholarly journals The Strong Prognostic Effect of Concurrent Deletions of IKZF1 and PAX5, CDKN2A, CDKN2B or PAR1 in the Absence of ERG Deletions (IKZF1plus) in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Strongly Depends on Minimal Residual Disease Burden after Induction Treatment

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 131-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Dagdan ◽  
Marketa Zaliova ◽  
Petra Dörge ◽  
Anja Möricke ◽  
Martin Zimmermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Pediatric All ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Technical advances in the field of genomic analyses have stimulated a large number of discovery studies on etiological and clinical endpoints in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to provide new avenues for preventive strategies, diagnostics and treatment. Recently, deletion of IKZF1 (IKZF1del) was described as a poor prognostic factor in pediatric ALL (Mullighan CG et al., 2012). In our trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 patients with IKZF1del had a lower 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 0.69±0.05 vs. 0.85±0.01; P<0.0001) compared to those without, mainly due to a higher cumulative incidence of relapses (CIR; 0.21±0.04 vs. 0.10±0.01; P=0.001) (Dörge P et al., 2013). IKZF1delwas an independent prognostic factor in this modern protocol. However, on its own, and even in association with minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, its relatively mild prognostic strength limited incorporation in clinical stratification strategies so far. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the prognostic effect of concurrent recurrent genetic aberrations in association with IKZF1del to further refine a high-risk genetic signature for pediatric ALL treated on AIEOP-BFM protocols. For this purpose, we studied a cohort of 1100 German patients with B-cell precursor ALL treated on AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 with available characterization of genetic aberrations at initial diagnosis by MLPA (MLPA SALSA kit P335; MRC-Holland) and a PCR assay for detection of ERG deletions (ERGdel; Zaliova M et al., 2014). Validation of results was conducted by use of an independent cohort of 417 Italian patients from the same trial. BCR/ABL1-positive patients were excluded from outcome analysis. When single marker analyses were conducted, IKZF1del was the strongest determinator of outcome in the discovery as well as the validation cohort. When IKZF1del was analyzed in combination with PAX5, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and PAR1 deletions, patients with an additional deletion to that of IKZF1 had the worst EFS and highest CIR in absence of ERGdel and, consequently, were grouped as IKZF1plus (definition: presence of IKZF1del and at least an additional deletion in PAX5, CDKN2A, CDKN2B or PAR1 in the absence of ERGdel). This group comprised 6% of B-lineage ALL patients and had a very poor clinical outcome: 5y-EFS 50%±0.06 compared to 86%±0.01 in IKZF1plus-negatives (p<0.0001); 5y-CIR 45%±0.06 compared to 11%±0.01 (p<0.0001) and was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analyses including MRD, slow early response, prednisone response, ETV6/RUNX1 status, and WBC (≥100.000/µl) (hazard ratio for an event: 3.39; 95% CI 2.09 – 5.48; p<0.0001). Surprisingly, stratified analysis by MRD demonstrated that the effect of IKZF1plus was restricted to those patients still carrying MRD loads of at least 10E-4 after induction treatment: standard-risk group 5y-EFS 94%±0.06 compared to 38%±0.09 in intermediate-risk and 27%±0.13 in high-risk patients (p<0.0001); standard-risk group 5y-CIR 6%±0.10 compared to 62%±0.10 in intermediate risk and 55%±0.17 in high-risk patients (p<0.0001). Hierarchical clustering of gene expression profiles of IKZF1plus patients did not demonstrate association specific to the different MRD risk groups. Similarly, analysis of whole exome and transcriptome data from material at initial diagnosis in a very restricted number of patients could not demonstrate insights into the observed differences. Newly identified very poor prognostic ALL subgroup – termed IKZF1plus – represented worse outcome compared to that of IKZF1del or others as a sole marker. The differential prognostic effect of IKZF1plus at different MRD levels without currently discernable molecular explanations suggest a quantitative mechanism with higher levels of leukemic cell burden during the early treatment phases predisposing to evolution of a treatment resistant leukemic clone under exposure towards genotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Potential explanations for these differences in treatment response may be undetected sub-clones already present at diagnosis or underlying germline genetic variation associated with treatment response. Further analyses will be required to better understand this phenomenon. However, due to its strength, the definition of IKZF1plus is likely to aid in the practical implementation of newly detected markers for risk stratification in childhood ALL in a clinical setting. Support: EU FP7 (ENCCA, TRANSCALL), IGA MZ NT/13170-4 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Role of MRD Monitoring in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allogeneic Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 983-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Sonia Bonanomi ◽  
Monica Manenti Tech ◽  
Maria Dassi ◽  
Giovanni Cazzaniga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Long Time

Abstract Relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allogeneic transplant has very poor prognosis; whether early prediction of relapse by means of minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis could allow effective treatment is still to be assessed. Eighteen patients at high risk of relapse were prospectively monitored in a single transplant center. MRD analysis and clinical follow up were completed for the first series of 11 patients. This includes 9 males and 2 females (median age 11ys, range 2–16) who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from compatible (5), one locus mismatched (1) or haploidentical (1) related or unrelated (4) donor for ALL in 1st (5), 2nd (4), or 3rd (2) complete remission (CR), after conditioning regimen containing total body irradiation (TBI) and etoposide (9) or others, and GVHD prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporine, associated with ATG in transplant from other than compatible related donor. Grafts consisted of unmanipulated bone marrow (9), containing a median of 6.6x106CD34+/Kg (range 1.7–8.6) and 57.2x106CD3+/Kg (range 24.4–96.2), or peripheral (1), containing 11x106CD34+/Kg and 174x106CD3+/Kg, or positively selected peripheral (1) containing 12x106CD34+/Kg and 0.04x106CD3+/Kg. Five patients developed grade II–IV acute GVHD, requiring ATG in 4 cases. Five of 11 patients are alive in CR at a median of 15 months (range 11–21), 1 died in CR at 7 months, 5 relapsed at a median of 8 months (range 3–23), and 3 of them died. Patients were monitored by clone-specific RQ-PCR of one (4) or two (7) Ig/TcR markers, with a sensitivity of at least 10−4. At the time of transplant 7 patients were positive at the analysis of the MRD, while 4 were negative; patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after transplantation, or according to clinical requirements. Among the 4 MRD negative patients, 1 remained negative and is in CR at 19 months, 1 became positive 6 months after unrelated transplant and relapsed 2 months later, 1 relapsed 30 months after haploidentical transplant, a long time after MRD monitoring had stopped, while 1 died in CR. Among the 7 MRD positive patients, 2 remained always MRD positive and relapsed 3 and 7 months after transplant, and 5 experienced MRD negativity at a certain time after transplant; 1 of 5 became MRD positive at the 6th month after transient negativity and relapsed 3 months later, 3 of 5 became negative since the 1st or 3rd month, remained negative, and are alive in CR at 9, 12, and 13 months after transplant, while the remaining 1 alternated negative and positive MRD results and is in CR at 6 months. In 5 patients quantitative MRD data allowed early immunosuppression tapering or discontinuation, yielding severe GVHD in 1, and DLI treatment was planned in 2, but refused in 1; 2 of these 5 are in CR, while 3 relapsed, despite 1 experienced transient MRD 1-log reduction and 1 negativization. In conclusion, MRD monitoring after BMT might direct either early immunosuppression tapering or DLI for prevention of relapse in high risk childhood ALL transplanted patients.

Minimal Residual Disease Detected Prior to Transplantation Is Associated with Adverse Outcome in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3246-3246
Author(s):  
Jennifer H Foster ◽  
Anne Woolfrey ◽  
Brent Wood ◽  
Blythe Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common form of malignancy in children. Advances in treatments have made ALL the disease highly curable; however for those patients who relapse, hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers a reasonable chance of cure. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by Multiparametric Flow Cytometery (MPF) is being used for risk adapted treatment decisions in many ALL trials. We present a series of 31 pediatric ALL patients who had morphologic and MPF evaluation of disease burden prior to ablative HSCT. Methods: Thirty one patients were treated at Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA for relapsed or very high risk ALL, were in complete morphologic remission, and received an ablative HSCT from May 2006-May 2008. Twelve patients were in second or third complete remission (CR) and 19 were in first CR. Eleven patients received a matched related donor, 20 patients received a unrelated donor graft. All patients underwent marrow evaluation including morphology and MPF within four weeks of their transplant date. The MPF was done by 7 or 9 color flow cytometry using the following reagents for B lineage: CD10, CD19, CD20, CD34, CD38, CD58 and CD45 and for T lineage: CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD34, CD56, and CD45. Transplant regimens were total body irradiation-based (1320 cGy) with either cyclophosphamide (n=24) or fludarabine (n=6). MRD+ was any detectable leukemia >0.01% of cells. All patients were in morphologic remission (< 5% blasts) at time of transplant. Events were defined as relapse or deaths. Results: 21 patients were MRD-, 10 were MRD+. The 2 year event free survival (EFS) for the entire group was 56% (+/−22%). The EFS at 20 months for those patients in CR1 and CR2/3 were 62% (+/−32%) and 40% (+/−32%), respectively. EFS, relapse risk and non relapse mortality was analyzed with respect to MRD status: MRD+ (n=10) MRD- (n=21) p value EFS 36% (+/−32%) 68% (+/−26%) 0.037 Relapse Risk 48% (+/−36%) 13% (+/−16%) 0.036 Non-relapse Mortality 30% (+/−36%) 23% (+/−26%) 0.45 Discussion: We present a single institution series of patients treated for high risk or relapsed ALL who underwent disease evaluation prior to HSCT with MPF. With the small number of patients evaluated, it appears that any amount of disease detected by MPF was an adverse risk factor for recurrence. Those patients who were MRD+ experienced a higher risk of death from relapse, however, experienced no difference in non-relapse mortality. Resistant disease as detected by MRD analysis at time of transplant is a marker for poor outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document