Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of Severe Toxicity in Patients with HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2587-2587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hatoon Ezzat ◽  
Matthew C Cheung ◽  
Lisa K Hicks ◽  
Kevin C Murphy ◽  
Chantal S Leger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Ct Dose ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occurs in HIV-infected individuals more frequently than in the HIV-negative population and the incidence is rising. Patients (pts) with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in HIV appear to have improved outcomes if they receive HAART with chemotherapy (CT). ABVD is standard CT for HL and is frequently administered with HAART in pts with HIV-HL. However, some components of the ABVD regimen may interact with antiretroviral (ARV) medications to alter metabolism and increase toxicity. In particular, vinblastine (VBL) is metabolized by CYP3A4 and protease inhibitors, particularly ritonavir (RTV), appear to inhibit this cytochrome potentially leading to higher VBL exposure. Little definitive information is available regarding how interactions might affect clinical outcome. We conducted a retrospective review of 36 pts with HIV-related HL to identify the frequency of neurotoxicity (NT), hematologic toxicity (HT), and lung toxicity (LT), to identify risk factors for severe (grade III–IV) toxicity, and to determine its clinical significance. Clinical data were collected from the CFE database and by chart review from 3 centers. The median age at HL diagnosis (dx) was 41 (range 29–66) years and 34 (94%) were male. HL was advanced stage in 28 (78%). Hasenclever score could be calculated in 23 pts and was 0–4 and ≥5 in 15 and 8 pts respectively. ECOG PS was 0–1 in 13 and ≥2 in 8 (n=21). HIV risk factor was: sexual, n=21 and other, n=5 (n=26). Median CD4 count at HL dx was 210 (2–660) cells/ul (n=31). Median HIV viral load (VL) was undetectable (<50; range <50->500,000) copies/ml (n=25). Hepatitis B and C coinfection was present in 8 and 7 pts respectively (n=29). Prior AIDS was present in 23, all opportunistic infections. Twenty-four pts received HAART with CT. Primary HL CT was: ABVD, n=29 (81%); MOPP/ABV, n=4 (11%); palliative, n=3 (8%). G-CSF was used in 22 pts. All pts received prophylaxis for PCP and 3 for HSV/VZV. HAART included 17 Arts in numerous combinations. Infectious complications were: bacterial infection, n=6; febrile neutropenia, n=4; HSV, n=3; PCP, n=1. HT occurred in 21 (75%) of 28 assessable pts and was grade 3–4 in 18 (64%; 18 and 15 were on HAART, respectively). NT occurred in 14 (50%) pts and was grade 3–4 in 6 (21%; 13 and 5 on HAART respectively, n=28). Of 6 cases of severe NT, 3 were autonomic neuropathy with pseudobowel obstruction that in 1 pt resulted in perforation. Bleomycin LT occurred in 3 pts (n=26). CT dose reduction (DR) of ≥25% in ≥1 agent was required in 9 pts (n=26). Factors associated with grade 3–4 HT were: receiving RTV, p=0.04, HR 2.9 (95% CI 1.1–7.4); and receiving lopinovir (LPV), p=0.02, HR 7.0 (2.3–21.3) and for any HT were: RTV, p=0.004, HR 3.1 (1.3–7.3); emtricitabine, p=0.01, HR 4.8 (1.4–11.6); and LPV, p=0.04, HR 4.4 (1.6–12.1). Factors for grade 3–4 NT were: LPV, p=0.05, HR 10.8 (2.0–59.5) and for any NT was: RTV, p=0.01, HR 4.0 (1.3–12.1). Fourteen pts received RTV and of 8 receiving LPV, 7 received LPV with RTV (p=0.007). At a median follow-up of 15.3 (0.1–154.8) months (mo) 25 pts (69%) are alive. The median overall survival (OS) for all pts was 44.5 (2–154.8) mo and there was no difference in OS by baseline features or the occurrence of HT or NT. However, CT dose reduction was associated with inferior OS (p=0.04, HR 3.9 [1.0–15.7]); although only 1 of 9 deaths was from HL progression; others were: infectious, n=6; and unrelated, n=2. In conclusion, pts with HIV-HL appear to experience a significantly increased incidence of NT compared to rates reported in non-HIV HL pts. In contrast, rates of HT and LT appear to be similar to those in non-HIV HL. The use of RTV or LPV during CT appeared to be associated with an increased risk of NT, suggesting a clinically significant interaction between these ARV agents and CT, particularly VBL. Prospective studies to devise a rational dosing strategy using measurements of ARV and/or CT levels are warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of High Dose Methotrexate in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and down Syndrome: a Case Cohort Study.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1626-1626
Author(s):  
T. Buitenkamp ◽  
R. Mathot ◽  
A. Vulto ◽  
A. Veerman ◽  
E. van Wering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Children with Down Syndrome (DS) have an increased risk of developing leukemia, including both acute myeloid, as well as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (DS-ALL). DS ALL patients have a poorer tolerance for high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), which is one of the key components of ALL treatment. There are no specific dosing guidelines for HD-MTX in DS-ALL. As a result doses are frequently reduced. In this study the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of HD-MTX were studied retrospectively in DS-ALL patients in order to develop specific dosing guidelines. Only one study addressed MTX-pharmacokinetics (PK) in DS children (Garre et al, J Pediatrics 1987). They found that median MTX plasma concentrations, 42 hours after infusion, were significantly higher in 5 DS-ALL patients compared to 3 non-DS controls. A retrospective case-cohort study was performed with DS-ALL patients enrolled in treatment protocols DCOG ALL-8, -9 or -10 in 8 Dutch medical centers during the period Nov 1991-Dec 2006. MTX dosages varied from 2.0–5.0 gr/m2 in the different treatment protocols. Forty-four DS and 87 non DS-ALL patients were included. The latter were matched for treatment protocol, sex and body surface area. All DS-ALL patients had B-cell-precursor ALL, and the median diagnostic WBC was 8,8*109/L. MTX serum levels and toxicity data were collected from patient files. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE v3.0. Population PK-models were fitted to data from all individuals simultaneously, using non-linear mixed effect modeling (NONMEM). The PK of MTX was described according to a two-compartment model with a first order elimination from the central compartment. A total of 468 HD-MTX courses were given to 44 DS and 87 non-DS children. In 20% of the DS-ALL patients doses were reduced, comprising 26/152 (17.1%) of MTX courses. In 18/26 courses, dose-reduction was electively initiated from the 1st course onwards, whereas in 8/26 courses dose-reductions were applied from the 2nd course onwards because of documented toxicity in the 1st course. Dose reductions did not occur in non DS-ALL patients (p<0.001). The cumulative frequency of grade 3/4 gastro-intestinal toxicity (mucositis) was significantly higher in DS versus non-DS children (27.6% of courses vs. 4.1%; p<0.001), including courses in which MTX was dose-reduced. Hemoglobin and WBC were significantly lower in DS-patients, but probably not clinically relevant, as the differences were small. The methotrexate clearance for DS-ALL patients was 5% lower than for non DS-ALL patients (p<0.001). Area under the curve (AUC) and MTX serum levels at various time-points after HD-MTX infusion were not different between DS and non-DS children. Moreover, there was no correlation between AUC (range 276–2603 μmol/L*hr) and grade 3 and 4 gastro-intestinal toxicity (rs 0.17; p=0.15). In fact grade 3/4 toxicity occurred at the lowest AUC of 276 μmol/L*hr. Hence no safe AUC could be defined. To summarize, DS-ALL patients suffer from increased risk of severe mucositis, which could not be explained by differences in PK, but are most likely due to pharmacodynamic effects of MTX. Given that only one patient needed a dose-reduction after severe toxicity when being treated with MTX dosages of 1–3 gr/m2, it seems safe to treat DS children with moderately high dosages of MTX and adjust dose in individual cases in case of severe toxicity. However, in case of 5 gr/m2, 8 patients needed dose-reduction, and hence this dose is probably too high for DS patients.

Pharmacogenetic Assessment of Toxicity and Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With LV5FU2, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI: FFCD 2000-05

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 2556-2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Jean Mendiboure ◽  
Jean-Pierre Pignon ◽  
Marie-Anne Loriot ◽  
Marine Castaing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cancérologie Digestive

Purpose The aim was to investigate whether germline polymorphisms within candidate genes known or suspected to be involved in fluorouracil (FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan pathways were associated with toxicity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Blood samples from 349 patients included in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 2000-05 randomized trial, which compared FU plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) followed by FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) followed by FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; sequential arm) with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (combination arm) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, were collected. Twenty polymorphisms within the DPD, TS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and UGT1A1 genes were genotyped. Results The ERCC2-K751QC allele was independently associated with an increased risk of FOLFOX-induced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .01). In the sequential arm, TS-5′UTR3RG and GSTT1 alleles were independently associated with response to LV5FU2 (P = .009) and FOLFOX (P = .01), respectively. The effect of oxaliplatin on tumor response increased with the number of MTHFR-1298C alleles (test for trend, P = .008). The PFS benefit from first-line FOLFOX was restricted to patients with 2R/2R (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68) or 2R/3R (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.82) TS-5′UTR genotypes, respectively. Conversely, patients with the TS-5′UTR 3R/3R genotype did not seem to benefit from the adjunction of oxaliplatin (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.40; trend between the three HRs, P = .006). Conclusion A pharmacogenetic approach may be a useful strategy for personalizing and optimizing chemotherapy in mCRC patients and deserves confirmation in additional prospective studies.

SDX-105 Demonstrates a High Response Rate as a Single-Agent with Acceptable Safety in Rituximab-Refractory, Relpased Indolent or Transformed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2480-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Robert O. Kerr ◽  
K. Sue Robinson ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Cell Death Pathway ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract SDX-105 (Treanda™, Bendamustine HCl) is an alkylating agent that may exert its anti-tumor activity via mitotic catastrophe, an apoptosis-independent cell-death pathway, as well as, through apoptosis. Its cytotoxic potency is unattenuated in chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma cell lines. We initiated a multi-center Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDX-105 in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent or transformed B cell NHL. Patients must have pathologically-confirmed disease that has been demonstrated to be rituximab-refractory (no response or progression within 6 months) or must be intolerant of rituximab. Other requirements include measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function (ANC ≥1K/mm3, platelet ≥ 100K/mm3, except in cases of >50% NHL in bone marrow), up to 3 prior chemotherapies, and no prior allogeneic transplant. Patients receive SDX-105, 120 mg/m2 IV over 30–60 min, days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity during a cycle results in dose reduction for subsequent cycles (to 90 mg/m2 and then to 60 mg/m2). Patients achieving stable disease or better after 6 cycles may receive up to 6 more cycles. 49 patients have been accrued to date with data available on the first 15 patients. The median age is 69 yrs (range 47–84), 47% male, median 6 yrs since diagnosis with NHL. Histologies: 10 follicular (6 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3), 2 SLL, 1 marginal zone and 2 transformed NHL. Other features include: 93% Stage III/IV, 20% with B symptoms, 87% with extranodal disease, median 2 prior chemotherapies with 40% not responding to last chemotherapy. 4 patients have required dose reduction to 90 mg/m2 and 2 patients have withdrawn prior to completing 6 cycles due to treatment-associated toxicity. The current overall response rate (ORR) based upon best response in the intent-to-treat population is 80% (CR/CRu 20%, PR 60%). Overall 73% of patients experienced a related non-hematologic adverse event (AE), of which 20% were Grade 3 and 0% Grade 4. The most frequent AEs were nausea (40%), vomiting (27%), fatigue (33%), anorexia (20%), and constipation (20%). Alopecia was not observed. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 53% (neutropenia), 20% (thrombocytopenia), and 13% (anemia) of patients. 4 patients experienced serious AEs, including 1 patient with baseline renal insufficiency who died on study from renal failure and pulmonary edema; other events include admissions for fever and anemia, urinary tract infection, and dehydration. Based upon these preliminary findings, SDX-105 demonstrates a high overall response rate with acceptable hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity in a relapsed lymphoma patient population, many of whom are refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy combinations. An additional study evaluating the combination of SDX-105 and rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent NHL who are rituximab-sensitive is also ongoing.

Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone and Rituximab (FMR) Regimen in Previously Untreated Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Efficacy, Safety and PET Data On 285 Patients.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2736-2736
Author(s):  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
Enrico Derenzini ◽  
Alessandro Broccoli ◽  
Letizia Gandolfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2736 In this retrospective single-center study we aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of fludarabine, mitoxantrone and rituximab (FMR) regimen as first line therapy in untreated patients with follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and indolent non-follicular NHL considering also the role of positron emission tomography (PET) after this chemo-immunotherapy induction as predictor of survival. Between January 2000 and May 2011, 285 patients with stage II-IV untreated indolent follicular (excluding grade IIIb) NHL (n=142) and indolent non-follicular (including marginal zone lymphoma, MZL [n=111] and small lymphocytic lymphoma, SLL [n=31]) NHL (n=143) were diagnosed and treated at our institution in the outpatient clinic. Median age was 63 years (range, 25–83 years) and the median time from diagnosis to study entry was 3 months (range, 1–5 months). 20 patients had stage II, 75 patients had stage III, and 190 had stage IV disease (155 patients had bone marrow involvement). Standard fludarabine (25 mg/m2 iv on days 2, 3 and 4), mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 iv on day 2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 iv on day 1) were given every 28 days for six cycles. Globally, after FMR regimen, the overall response rate (ORR) was 83.2%, including a 71.6% complete remission (CR) rate (204 patients) and a 11.6% partial remission (PR) rate (33 patients). According to the histology, in the follicular subset, the ORR was 81.1% with a CR rate of 69.2% while in the indolent non-follicular subset the ORR was 85.2% with a CR rate of 73.9%. In particular, in the indolent non-follicular NHL subgroup the CR rate was 80.2% in MZLs and 51.6% in SLLs, respectively. Toxicities were generally mild and mainly hematologic. Overall 88 (30.8%) patients had grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity, and 26 (9.1%) patients had non-hematologic toxicity with 3 cases of grade ≥3 (1 neurologic toxicity and 2 hepatic toxicity). In terms of secondary malignancies, only 3 (1.0%) hematologic neoplasms were reported (1 myelodisplastic syndrome after 9 months from the end of the treatment and 2 acute lymphoblastic leukemia after 8 and 11 months from the end of the treatment, respectively). Globally with a median follow up of 40 months (range, 12–144 months), at 11 years the overall survival (OS) was 78.8%, the disease-free survival (DFS) was 73.4% (with only 29 relapses), and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 71.9%. Regarding the comparison between the two subsets, follicular vs indolent non-follicular, no statistically significant differences were observed in OS, DFS and PFS curves. Furthermore, a sub-sample of 132 patients (75 follicular NHLs and 57 indolent non-follicular NHLs) had a PET evaluation before the treatment (staging) and 4 to 6 weeks after completion of the sixth cycle of chemo-immunotherapy (restaging, final PET [f-PET]). Post-induction PET-positive patients had a significantly inferior OS at 6 years: 71.4% compared with 98.4% for f-PET-negative patients (p<0.0001, Figure 1a). In terms of PFS at 6 years, there was not a statistically significant difference among f-PET-positive patients and f-PET-negative patients (Figure 1b). Figure 1a. Figure 1a. Figure 1b. Figure 1b. In conclusion, this study suggests and confirms that FMR is a very active, well tolerated (in terms of acute and long-term side effects) chemo-immunotherapy front-line treatment for follicular NHL and indolent non-follicular NHL. PET status at the end of this chemo-immunotherapy induction is quite controversial as a predictor of survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Evaluation of the Regimen Brentuximab Vedotin Plus ESHAP (BRESHAP) in Refractory or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: Preliminary Results of a Phase I-II Trial from the Spanish Group of Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplantation (GELTAMO)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 582-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Garcia-Sanz ◽  
Anna Sureda ◽  
Sara Alonso-Alvarez ◽  
Ana Pilar Gonzalez ◽  
Antonia Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract Introduction: Around 30% of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients are refractory or relapse (RR) after first line therapy. Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (APBSCT) can cure many patients, but those who are transplanted with active disease detectable by PET-CT have a very poor prognosis. Therefore, the current challenge in HL is to improve the results of the pre-transplant chemotherapy. Phase 2 single agent trials with Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) in highly RRHL patients have demonstrated overall and complete response rates of 75% and 34%, respectively (Younes, JCO 2012; 30:2183); as 2nd line, BV has provided very promising results in combination with chemotherapy (LaCasce, Blood 2014; 124(21):3099) Objectives: We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and response rate with combined Brentuximab vedotin with ESHAP chemotherapy [BRESHAP] as 2nd line therapy for RRHL prior to APBSCT (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02243436). Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of complete responses (CR) pre-APBSCT. It is a phase I-II trial with dose escalation followed by expansion. Treatment consisted of Etoposide (40 mg/m2/day IV, D1-4), Solumedrol (250 mg/day IV, D1-4), High dose AraC (2 g/m2 IV, D5) and cisPlatin (25 mg/m2/day IV, D1-4). BV was administered at three dose levels: 0.9, 1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg IV on day 1 to each cohort of patients, following the scheme of cohorts of 3 patients each, to assess the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 4 hematologic toxicity extended over 3 weeks or non-hematologic toxicity grade ≥3 during the first treatment cycle. Patients were evaluated weekly. Results: Patients with relapsed or refractory classical HL (cHL) after one prior line of therapy were eligible. To date, 27 patients have been included in the trial. The first 9 have completed the three courses as scheduled, without TLD doses. Fifteen patients have received the first full cycle, presenting 4 episodes of severe adverse reactions: non-neutropenic fever due to IV AraC and to complicated catheter insertion; one pneumothorax after catheter insertion; and one febrile neutropenia recovered with antibiotic treatment. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity presented in three of these nine patients: 2 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia 1. All nine patients underwent stem cell mobilization after the 1st or the 2nd treatment cycle with subcutaneous G-CSF 5 mcg/Kg days +7 to +14, collecting >2·10e6/Kg peripheral blood CD34+ cells in all cases, with no grade 3-4 toxicity. The number of harvesting procedures was one & two in seven & two patients, respectively. The transplant has been done in 6 patients, with a median of 9 days and 10 days for neutrophil and platelet recovery, respectively. All nine patients had no evidence of disease before the transplant by PET-CT, although one patient had residual FGD uptaking areas without underlying anatomical lesions on CT (metabolic complete response: 89%). Six patients have been evaluated after the APBSCT and they are all in metabolic CR. The phase II of the trial was open on April the 12th 2015, with BV at the recommended dose of 1.8 mg/kg per course. At the submission of this report, there were 28 patients recruited, and 17 evaluated pre-transplant, achieving 16 CR. The complete results will be presented during the meeting; the projected recruitment by the meeting is 45 (65% of the total planned recruitment). Conclusions: BRESHAP is a tolerable treatment scheme as remission induction prior to transplant in patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma, and it offers very promising results. Disclosures Off Label Use: Brentuximab Vedotin in Resistant or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma patients who are candidates to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant. Sureda:Seattle Genetics Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Infectious Complications of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies: Implications for Screening, Prophylaxis, and Management

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
David J Epstein ◽  
Jeffrey Dunn ◽  
Stan Deresinski
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Latent Tuberculosis ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Virus Reactivation ◽  
Oral Agents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Substantial Risk

Abstract Multiple sclerosis therapies include interferons, glatiramer, and multiple immunosuppressive drugs. Discerning infectious risks of immunosuppressive drugs requires understanding their mechanisms of action and analyzing interventional studies and postmarketing observational data. Though identical immunosuppressive therapies are sometimes used in non-neurologic conditions, infectious risks may differ in this population. Screening for and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection should be prioritized for patients receiving alemtuzumab; ocrelizumab is likely not associated with an increased risk of TB. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be devastating for patients treated with ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab, whereas the small molecule oral agents do not likely pose substantial risk of HBV. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a particular concern with natalizumab. Alemtuzumab, and possibly natalizumab and fingolimod, risks herpes virus reactivation and may warrant prophylaxis. Unusual opportunistic infections have been described. Vaccination is an important tool in preventing infections, though vaccine timing and contraindications can be complex.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results of a Phase I Study of Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax, and Lenalidomide in Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4185-4185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
Farrukh T. Awan ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Sabarish Ayyappan ◽  
Robert A Baiocchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Combined obinutuzumab (O) and lenalidomide (L) has demonstrated safety and preliminary efficacy in follicular lymphoma1. Venetoclax (V), a BCL2 inhibitor, as a single agent2 and in combination with rituximab3 is under development in several subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We are conducting a phase I study of the combination of O, V, and L to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and preliminary efficacy. Methods: Pts with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), transformed, high grade B-cell, Burkitt, marginal zone, and follicular (FL) lymphoma who have received ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible. Prior autologous but not allogeneic stem cell transplant were permitted. Prior L or BCL2 family inhibitors, CNS involvement, and active hepatitis or HIV infection were not permitted. ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 75,000/mm3, creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min, ALT/AST ≤ 3 x ULN, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and ECOG PS 0-2 were required at study entry. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of L days 1-21 and V days 1-28 of a 28 day cycle (Table 1). O 1000 mg was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 2-6. A 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed. DLTs included: treatment delays > 28 days; ANC < 500 / mm3 or platelets <25, 000 / mm3 persisting > 28 days; grade 4 febrile neutropenia or infection or grade 3 that fails to resolve within 7 days; and any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: DVT, tumor flare reaction controllable with steroids, tumor lysis syndrome that does not require dialysis, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting responsive to medical treatment, transient electrolyte abnormalities or elevations of ALT / AST that resolve ≤ grade 1 within 48 hours, grade 3 infusion reactions responsive to medical therapy. Pts without significant toxicity or progression could continue treatment up to 12 cycles. Response was assessed every 3 months for 12 months and then every 6 months until disease progression. Results: 14 pts have been treated. Median age is 61 years (range 35-78 years) with 10 males. Median prior therapies is 2 (range 1-10). 5 pts had bulky disease (≥ 7.5 cm) and median baseline lactate dehydrogenase was 274 U/L (range 151-894, 12/14 above ULN 190 U/L). 10 pts were refractory to their last therapy. Histologies include DLBCL/transformed lymphoma (n=11) and FL (n=3). 3 pts were treated at dose level (DL) 1 (V 400 mg / L 15 mg). One pt experienced DLT, grade 3 neutropenic fever lasting > 7 days. DL 1 was expanded and no additional DLTs occurred. One pt with DLBCL was replaced for disease progression. 4 pts were then treated at DL 2 (V 600 mg / L 15 mg), and no DLTs were encountered. One pt was replaced due to missed doses of the oral agents. A total of 3 pts have been treated at DL 3 (V 800 mg / L 15 mg) and no DLTs have occurred at the time of data cutoff. Related grade 3-4 toxicities were primarily hematologic including neutropenia (n= 11, 78.6%), anemia (n=1, 7%), and thrombocytopenia (n=2, 14.3%). Grade 3-4 infections included sepsis, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and a urinary tract infection. No clinically significant tumor lysis has occurred. Pts have received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-12) and 4 remain on therapy. Five pts have achieved a response. At DL 1, a pt with DLBCL, GC type, achieved a complete response (CR) and 2 pts with transformed FL achieved a partial response (PR). At DL 2, 1 pt with FL achieved a CR. At DL 3, 1 pt with transformed FL/double hit achieved a PR. Ten pts have discontinued, 6 with progression and 1 for DLT, alternative treatment, physician preference, and diagnosis of MDS in a patient with 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: Combined treatment with O, V, and L administered up to 12 cycles has been feasible with hematologic toxicity being the most common adverse event. Enrollment is ongoing and will include expansion cohorts in FL and DLBCL.Fowler et al. Activity of the immunologic doublet of lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab in relapsed follicular lymphoma: Results of a phase I/II study. JCO 2015; 35: 7531.Gerecitano et al. A Phase 1 Study of Venetoclax (ABT-199 / GDC-0199) Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Blood 2015; 126: 254.Zinzani et al. Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax Plus Rituximab or Randomized Ven Plus Bendamustine+Rituximab (BR) Versus BR in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Interim Data. Blood 2016; 128:617. Disclosures Maddocks: Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Blum:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Christian:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals PVAG Regimen (Prednisone, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Gemcitabine) Used in Real-Life Setting in First Line Therapy for Elderly Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: A Retrospective Study of Lysa Centers

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Guillaume Aussedat ◽  
Maryam Idlhaj ◽  
Amandine Durand ◽  
Xavier Roussel ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advisory Role

Introduction: Older patients with an age above 60 years with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) represent a proportion of 20% to 30% of all cHL. Older cHL patients are characterized by unfavorable prognostic factors with an aggressive disease, a poor tolerance to chemotherapy especially with bleomycin-induced lung toxicity resulting to a significant reduced survival as compared to younger patients. PVAG regimen (prednisone, vinblastine, doxorubicin, gemcitabine) was developed by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) to improve results and reduce toxicities of ABVD regimen. In a prospective phase II study of 55 early unfavorable and advanced-stage elderly HL patients (median age, 68 years), 78% achieved complete response (CR) with a 3-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 58% and 66%, respectively (Böll et al, Blood 2011) with favorable toxicity profile. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report that described efficacy and toxicity of this protocol in real-life setting. Methods: Between June 2011 and February 2020, 49 elderly patients with cHL received first-line chemotherapy with PVAG (Prednisone 40 mg/m2, Vinblastine 6 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, or adapted-dose of PVAG) in 6 LYSA centers. All medical records were reviewed for clinical and biological characteristics, modality of treatment, responses and outcome. Comorbidities were evaluated according to the cumulative illness rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G) and treatment-related toxicity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results: The median age of the 49 patients was 76 years (range, 61-87) with 44 patients ≥70 years old (69%) and 27 male (55%). Ann Arbor stages were as follows: II (n=16, 33%), III (n=12, 24%), IV (n=21, 43%). Altered performance status (PS 2-4) was presented in 35% of patients and B symptoms in 59%. IPS was ≥3 in 32 (65%) patients. CIRS-G Grade 3 or 4 in two or more categories was observed in 11 patients (22%) and 22 patients (43%) had a cumulative CIRS-G score over 6. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range 1-8), 21 of them (43%) received adapted dose of PVAG. Seven patients (14%) received radiotherapy after respectively 3, 4, 6, or 8 cycles of PVAG. At the end of PVAG regimen, 26 patients were in CR (53%), 4 PR (8%), 19 patients progressed (39%). For the 46 patients who were evaluated by PET-CT after chemotherapy, the CR and PR rates were 52% and 13% with 35% of patients with stable or progressive diseases. For hematologic toxicity, 6 patients (12%) developed febrile neutropenia, 22 (45 %) had grade III-IV neutropenia; 8 (16 %) a grade 3-4 thrombopenia; 17 (35%) grade 3-4 anemia. Extra-hematologic toxicities were mild with three patients (6%) with grade 3-4 mucositis, 2 (4%) grade 3-4 nausea, 5 (10%) with grade 3-4 neuropathy, 3 (6%) acute heart toxicity. With a median follow up of 33,2 months (range, 14,3 -53,7), 26 (53%) patients progressed or relapsed. The median PFS was 21,6 months with a 3-year PFS rate of 48,6% (95%CI, 36,3-65,1). The median overall survival (OS) was 66,5 months with a 3-year OS rate of 73,7% (95%CI, 61,2-88,8). The cause of death was HL in 8 patients (16%), infection in 2 (4%); one toxic death occurred (sepsis after first cycle of PVAG). In univariate analysis, PFS (HR: 2,36, 95CI, 1,01-5,48, P=0.0,046) and OS (HR: 4,23, 95%CI, 1,15-15,6, P=0.03) were adversely affected by high number of medications (&gt;3). OS was adversely affected by grade 3-4 CIRS-G in ≥2 categories (HR: 3,63, 95%CI, 1,23-10,71, P=0.019). Age, IPS, presence of B symptoms, lymphopenia, anemia, low albumin level, CIRS-G&gt;6 did not affect outcome. Conclusions:Our real-life evaluation of PVAG regimen showed that patients were older than those included in the pivotal clinical trial and 58% of patients received adapted-dose of chemotherapy. We confirmed the favorable safety profile of this protocol. Using TEP-scan evaluation, the CR rate was 52%. Survival analyses supported initial results obtained in clinical trial. Combinations with immunotherapies with clinical activity in cHL should be evaluated to improve results of this regimen. Disclosures Brice: Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Salles:Epizyme: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role ; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Genmab: Honoraria, Other; Debiopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; MorphoSys: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; Roche: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; Abbvie: Other: consultancy or advisory role; Autolos: Other: consultancy or advisory role. Deau Fischer:Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

scholarly journals HIV AND LYMPHOMA: FROM EPIDEMIOLOGY TO CLINICAL MANAGEMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Re ◽  
Chiara Cattaneo ◽  
Giuseppe Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Oncogenic Viruses ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Systemic Symptoms ◽  
Negative Population ◽  
Hiv Negative

Patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus are at increased risk for developing both non Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). Even if this risk has decreased for NHL after the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), they remain the most common AIDS-related cancer in the developed world. They are almost always of B-cell origin, and some specific lymphoma types are more common than others. Some of these lymphoma types can occur in both HIV-uninfected and infected patients, while others preferentially develop in the context of AIDS. HIV-associated lymphoma differ from lymphoma in the HIV negative population in that they more often present with advanced disease, systemic symptoms, and extranodal involvement and are frequently associated with oncogenic viruses (EBV and/or HHV-8). Before the introduction of cART, most of these patients could not tolerate the treatment strategies routinely employed in the HIV-negative population. The widespread use of cART has allowed for the delivery of full-dose and dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens with improved outcomes that nowadays can be compared to those seen in non-HIV infected patients. However, a great deal of attention should be paid to opportunistic infections and other infectious complications, cART-chemotherapy interactions, and potential cumulative toxicity. In the context of relatively sparse prospective and randomized trials, the optimal treatment of AIDS-related lymphomas remains a challenge, particularly in patients with severe immunosuppression. This paper will address epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies in HIV-associated NHL and HL.

An International Multicentric Trial with Fludarabine Plus Cyclosphosphamide in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) “Up Front”: Second Interim Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4969-4969
Author(s):  
Fernando Bezares ◽  
Cecilio Jait ◽  
Daniel Caviglia ◽  
Daniel Bhar ◽  
Andrea Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Fludarabine Monophosphate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
C 30 ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Introduction: On August 2002 an international multicentric trial on Fludarabine monophosphate (FAMP) plus Cyclophsphamyde (Cy) among previously untreated B-cell CLL, was activated. Our aim is to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of FAMP plus Cy in previously untreated B-cell CLL patients (pts). This is the second interim analysis after a fourth-year period. Material and Methods: Treatment consists in three consecutive days of oral FAMP 40 mg/m2 (n=84) or i.v. FAMP 25 mg/m2 (n=13) plus i.v. Cy 600 mg/m2 on day 1 or Cy 250 mg/m2 from day 1 to 3, every 28 days × 6 cycles. Responses were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute working group criteria after cycle 3 and again after cycle 6. Since August 2002 to March 2006, 109 CLL pts from Argentina (n=95), Perú (n=11) and Uruguay (n=3) were enrolled for this protocol; eighty-nine were evaluated for response and toxicity. Median age: 64 years old (range: 44–81); male = 47, female = 42; Binet staging: A=14, B=45, C=30; median beta-2 microglobuline = 4.00 mg/dL (range: 1.3–9.2); median LDH = 341 UI/L (range: 101–762); among patients with available data the CD 38 expression more than 10% was 38% (22 of 58 pts). Blood counts at inclusion: median values (range); Lymphocytes: 32 ×109/L (2,7–137), Hb: 120 g/L (50–164), platelets: 175×109/L (10–364). Renal and hepatic parameters within normal range limits. Cytogenetic by banding was available in 27 cases: no alterations (n=17), +12 (n=1), del (6), del (12) (n=1), lost Y (n=1). Results: At the time of this second interim analysis (March 2006), 56.2% (50 pts) had completed 6 cycles and 97.8% (87 pts) had undergone at least 3 cycles. Overall responses: 92% = 81 pts (CR: 39% = 35 pts; PR: 52% = 46 pts); treatment failure: 9% = 7 pts. Evaluation for toxicity: 89 episodes of haematological toxicity and 7 episodes of infection grade 3–4 were reported after 436 cycles. Thirteen pts died: seven due infectious complications because of prolonged hematologic toxicity; one due to tumoral lysis syndrome, one due hemoptysis associated with lung cancer and the remaining four due disease progression. At 24 months, estimated DFS was 70% (figure 1, SE 7.6%) and estimated Overall Survival was 76% (figure 2, SE 7.4%). The median survival was not achieved in responders (PR and CR). Conclusion: FAMP plus Cy combination as front-line treatment is effective in B-cell CLL. Haematologic toxicity is the most severe adverse events. The response rates to this therapy is quite similar to those reported for other multicentric trials and better than others GATLA protocols. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document