Analysis of Immunophenotypic Response (IR) by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry In 516 Myeloma Patients Included In Three Consecutive Spanish Trials

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1910-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María-Belén Vidriales ◽  
María-Angeles Montalbán ◽  
María-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1910 The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients has markedly improved in the last decade. Thus, overall response rates between 85%-95%, with 30%-50% complete remission (CR) rates are now being reported in young patients treated with novel agents plus high-dose therapy/autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT). A similar scenario is also emerging in the elderly (non-transplant candidates) population. Accordingly, more sensitive techniques are needed to assess patients’ response; these may contribute to compare the efficacy of different treatment schemas, to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) and for prognostication. In the present study we have assessed the frequency and the prognostic value of IR by multiparameter flow cytometry in a total of 516 newly diagnosed MM patients included in three consecutive PETHEMA/GEM Spanish trials: two designed for transplant candidate patients - GEM 2000 (n=157) and GEM2005<65y (n=206) - and one for elderly patients - GEM2005>65y (n=153). The GEM2000 trial was based on 6 induction cycles of VBMCP/VBAD followed by HDT/ASCT; the GEM2005<65y included three arms with 6 cycles each (Thalidomide/Dexamethasone -TD-, Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone -VTD- and, VBMCP/VBAD with Bortezomib in the two final cycles -VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib) followed by HDT/ASCT; and the GEM2005>65y compared 6 cycles of Bortezomib/Melphalan/Prednisone -VMP- vs. Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Prednisone -VTP-. All three trials had in common that patients received 6 induction cycles and IR was evaluated at this time point. In addition, IR was assessed on day +100 after HDT/ASCT in the first two trials. Patients were defined to be in IR when myelomatous plasma cells (MM-PCs) were undetectable by MFC or when less than one phenotypically aberrant PC was detected among 104 cells analyzed. Patients were referred for MRD studies if they were mainly in CR or VGPR. The IR rates reported here were calculated on intention to treat analysis. Figure 1 summarizes the IR rates after induction. The lowest IR rates corresponded to the VBMCP/VBAD and TD schemes (5% and 6%, respectively) while with the bortezomib-based regimens an approximately 3-fold increment in the IR rates was observed: VTP (12%), VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib (15%), VMP (16%) and VTD (17%). After HDT/ASCT, IR rates were found to be significantly increased (p<.001) in the GEM2000 protocol (14%) and in all arms of the GEM2005<65y trial: TD (18%), VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib (30%) and VTD (34%). Thus, a minimum 2-fold increment of IR rates was further achieved after HDT/ASCT. In addition, IR rates achieved after HDT/ASCT in patients included in all three arms of the GEM2005<65y trial were significantly superior (p≤.008) to cases treated according to the GEM2000 protocol, indicating that induction regimens with novel agents improved post-transplantation rates of IR. Moreover, bortezomib-based regimens vs. TD were associated with increased IR rates not only before but also after HDT/ACSCT (p=.06 and p=.02 for VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib and VTD, respectively). We further compared the impact of achieving an IR after induction and at day+100 after HDT/ASCT in the progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within the three protocols. Patients in IR status after an induction regimen according to the GEM2000, GEM2005<65y and GEM2005>65y protocols showed significantly longer (p<.001) 3-year PFS rates (100%, 100% and 90%, respectively) compared to patients in a no-IR status (61%, 59% and 35%, respectively). Similarly, 3-year OS rates were significantly longer (p=.01) in IR vs. no-IR patients status (100%, 100% and 94% vs. 84%, 90% and 76% for the GEM2000, GEM2005<65y and GEM05>65y protocols, respectively). Likewise, an IR vs. no-IR status after HDT/ASCT in both the GEM2000 and GEM05<65y trials was also associated with significantly increased 3-year PFS (p<.001) and OS (p=.007) rates. In summary, this study demonstrates that the achievement of an IR is a strong prognostic factor regardless of the type of treatment; thus, higher IR rates may help to identify optimal therapeutical schemes. In this sense, HDT/ASCT is able to markedly increase IR rates after induction even in the era of novel agents, and this translates into extended survival. Disclosures: Off Label Use: VTP is not approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients and VT and VP are not approved for maintenance therapy. None of the combinations proposed, VBCMP/VBAD plus bortezomib, VT and VTD are approved as induction therapy in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Mateos:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Rosiñol:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cibeira:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Oriol:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. de Arriba:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Palomera:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. De La Rubia:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Díaz-Mediavilla:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Garcia-Laraña:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Sureda:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Alegre:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. San Miguel:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The Introduction of Novel Agents Improves Outcomes of Young Patients with Myeloma (MM) Treated with Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1348-1348
Author(s):  
Radovan Saso ◽  
Kevin D Boyd ◽  
Kabir Mohammed ◽  
Ping Wu ◽  
Jennifer Treleaven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1348 Background: There has been an improvement in the population based survival of patients with MM in the UK (Office of National Statistics), however, because of the way the data is collected it is uncertain what has happened to the outcome of younger patients. High dose melphalan with ASCT has formed an integral part of the treatment of younger patients with myeloma for more than 20 years. During this time the context within which this treatment has been delivered has changed. Peripheral blood stem cell harvesting has replaced bone marrow harvesting, and importantly, novel agents have become available at induction and at relapse. It is not known how these changes have affected patient outcome. We analysed the survival of patients undergoing ASCT for MM in a single referral centre over an 18 year period to assess the impact of these changes. Patients: 1291 patients with myeloma were registered on the Royal Marsden Hospital Database in the period between 1981–2009, of which 875 patients underwent autologous transplantation. Bone marrow transplant (BMT) was performed in 191 patient, while 684 patients had peripheral blood stem cell transplant (SCT). Prognostic Factors: The following factors were found to be associated with improved overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis: Salmon Durie Stage A vs Stage B (p<0.004), ISS Stage I vs II vs III (p<0.001), response to chemotherapy CR vs PR vs Other (p<0.007), Platelets >130 vs <130 × 109/L (p<0.001), Hb >10 vs <10 g/dl (p<0.001), Calcium <10 vs >10mg/dl, Albumin >35 vs <35g/L (p<0.034), B-2M >3.5 vs <3.5 mg/l (p<0.001), IgG vs IgA vs BJ (p<0.038). Variables significant in multivariate testing were: Response to chemotherapy CR vs <CR (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0–2.0), Platelets >130 (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.3–0.9), Calcium (HR1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.5) and B2M (HR2.1; 95% CI 1.5–2.9). These variables were significantly associated with OS in the overall dataset, and in the subgroup of younger patients under the age of 60. Response and Survival: The overall response (OR) rate following induction chemotherapy was 84%, including 22% complete responses (CR). Following autologous SCT, CR rates improved to 42%, with an OR of 91%. Analysis of actuarial survival for the whole group of patients who had SCT showed that young patients had significantly longer survival (Median survival: <60yrs vs. >60yrs; 8.7yrs vs 6.2yrs, p<0.009). In order to assess the impact of the introduction of new therapeutic agents in, we defined groups of patients treated in five year periods: 1991–1996, 1997–2003, 2004–2009. 5 year OS was unchanged when comparing the first two cohorts. However, the cohort of patients treated from 2004–2009 were associated with significant improvement in 5 year survival rates, from 61% for the earlier quinquennia to 82% for those treated in 2004-9 (p<0.001). We also assessed the impact of the introduction of SCT compared to BMT. SCT entered routine use at this centre in 2002, and patient outcomes did not improve from 2002–2004. The improved survival after 2004 is therefore unlikely to be due to the introduction of SCT. Summary: We found that patient survival following ASCT did not change significantly during the period 1991–2004. However, since 2004 survival rates have improved significantly, and the group that benefitted most were patients under the age of 60. This time period corresponds to the incorporation of novel agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide into induction and relapse regimens, and suggests that novel agents have significantly improved the outcome of younger patients with myeloma in the context of treatment with ASCT. Disclosures: Boyd: celgene: Honoraria. Davies:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Achievement of Complete Response Is a Strong Prognostic Factor In Elderly Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Retrospective Analysis of 1175 Patients

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1949-1949
Author(s):  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
P.W. Wijermans ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Tommasina Guglielmelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Maximal Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1949 Introduction: There is extensive evidence from numerous studies in the transplant setting that achievement of complete response (CR) or at least very good partial response (VGPR) is significantly associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In elderly myeloma patients CR was a rare event since new drugs has been added to standard melphalan-prednisone (MP). After the introduction of novel agents, CR represents an achievable goal, also outside of the transplant setting. Aims: to assess the impact of response to treatment on time-to-event parameters (PFS and OS) in elderly myeloma patients. Methods: We retrospectively analysed newly diagnosed myeloma patients, older than 65 years old, or younger but not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and transplant. Patients were enrolled in 3 multicentre randomized European trials of the GIMEMA and Hovon groups, and were treated with MP (n=332), MP plus thalidomide (MPT, n=332), MP plus bortezomib (VMP, n=257) or MP plus bortezomib-thalidomide followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT, n=254). PFS, OS and duration of CR were analysed by the Cox proportional hazards model, comparing the two arms by the Wald test and calculating 95% confidence interval (CI). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following variables: age at diagnosis (>75 vs. ≤75 yrs), International Staging System (ISS) stages, type of chemotherapy and best response achieved. Best response was treated as a time-dependent variable. Results: A total of 1,175 patients, enrolled from November, 2001 to January, 2009, were retrospectively analysed. The best response to treatment was available in 1,136 patients: CR was reported in 195, VGPR in 212, PR in 397. Baseline characteristics according to best response achieved in patients who obtained CR, VGPR or PR were similar. Since response rates vary according to treatment regimens the proportion of patients who received MP, MPT, VMP, and VMPT-VT was different in the different response categories. After a median follow-up of 29 months, PFS was significantly higher in patients who achieved CR compared to those who obtained VGPR (HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.10–0.24; p<0.001) or PR (HR 0.07; 95% CI 0.04–0.13; p<0.001). The advantage in PFS translated into an advantage in OS: patients obtaining CR have a significantly prolonged OS than patients who achieved VGPR (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.08–0.28; p<0.001) or PR (HR 0.08; 95% CI 0.04–0.16, p<0.001), (table). In multivariate analysis CR achievement was as an independent predictor of longer PFS and OS, regardless of age, ISS stage, and treatment administered. In patients > 75 years, both PFS and OS were shorter as compared to younger patients. Despite these differences, the impact of CR on outcome was identical. In the subgroup of patients > 75 years, PFS was significantly prolonged in patients who achieved CR, compared with those who obtained VGPR (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12–0.58, p = 0.001) or PR (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.10–0.41, p < 0.001). Accordingly, OS was significantly higher in patients who achieved CR, compared with those who obtained VGPR (HR 0.13; 95% IC 0.03–0.58; p = 0.007), or PR (HR 0.12; 95% IC 0.03–0.51, p = 0.004), (table). No significant PFS differences between patients obtaining CR during the first 6 months of treatment or later were seen (HR 1.06; 95% IC 0.49–2.27; p=0.878). Similarly, no OS differences between these two groups were detected (p = 0.676). Duration of CR was comparable in patients who obtained CR during or after the first 6 months of treatment (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.30–1.45; p = 0.305). Patients whose CR lasted more than 18 months have a significant OS benefit compared to patients who did not (p=0.006). Conclusions: These finding highlight the importance of CR, also outside of the transplant setting, regardless of age, ISS and treatment administered, and support the use of new drugs, also in patients older than 75 years, to achieve and maintain maximal response. Disclosures: Gay: Celgene: Honoraria. Bringhen:Calgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Guglielmelli:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson : Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palumbo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Cladribine Combined with Idarubicin and High-Dose AraC (CLIA2) As a Frontline and Salvage Treatment for Young Patients (≤65 yrs) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansour Alfayez ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Marina Y. Konopleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Intrathecal Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Nucleoside analogues such as cladribine can increase the efficacy of cytarabine (araC) by modulating deoxycytidine kinase. The addition of cladribine to standard 7+3 chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in pts with AML (Holowiecki JCO 2012). Results of our part-1 phase-2 clinical trial (cladribine combined with intermediate dose araC and idarubicin (CLIA1)) reported promising results that exceeded pretreatment expectations for response and tolerability (Jain, et. al. ASH 2016). Based on that, and the benefit of higher doses of cytarabine in younger patients (UK-MRC AML, Willemze JCO 2014), we investigated a higher dose of araC in combination with cladribine and idarubicin (CLIA2). Methods Non-APL, non-core binding factor AML pts 18-65 yrs of age with adequate organ function were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: de novo AML, secondary AML (s-AML), or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R). Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5, followed by araC 2g/m2 IV on days 1-5, and idarubicin 10 mg/m2 IV days 1-3. Consolidation consisted of up to 5 more cycles of CLIA2 for 3 days instead of 5. Dose-adjustments were allowed for age and PS. Sorafenib or midostaurin was added for pts with FLT3 mutations which occurred in 35% of pts on this study. Prophylactic intrathecal therapy was offered to higher risk pts at count nadir during cycle 1. Mutation profiling was performed using next generation sequencing prior to starting therapy. Results 65 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 47 yrs (range, 24-65): 37 pts (57%) in the frontline, 12 (19%) pts in the s-AML, and 16 (25%) in the R/R cohorts. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table 1. The most commonly detected mutations at baseline were TET2 (45%), DNMT3a (37%), FLT3 (35%), ASXL1 (28%), and NPM1 (28%). Of 35 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, 31 responded (ORR=89%) with 27 CR (77%) and 4 CRi (11%). Among the responders, 61% were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD [-]) by multiparameter flow cytometry. In the s-AML cohort, 10 pts were evaluable with an ORR of 60% (6/10) with 5 CR (50%) and 1 CRp (10%); 4 (67%) were MRD [-]. In the R/R cohort, 14 pts, previously treated with a median of 1 (1-4) prior therapy were evaluable for response. There were 7 CR (50%), 1 CRi (7%), for ORR of 57%; and 63% were MRD [-]. The median OS was not reached in the frontline and s-AML cohorts with median follow up of 5.2 and 11.5, months, respectively. In the R/R cohort, the median follow up was 4.7 months and median OS was 6.7 months [Figure.1]. Relapse-free survival was not reached in frontline and salvage cohort, and was 9.1 months in s-AML with median follow up of 5.2, 3.9, and 3.5 months in frontline, s-AML, and salvage cohorts, respectively [Figure.2]. The regimen was well tolerated. The most common ≥ grade 3 possibly-related non-hematologic adverse events were fever/infection (38), bleeding (2), and abnormal liver function test (3). Conclusion The 3-drug combination with a higher dose of araC, CLIA2, is safe and effective in younger pts with AML. Compared to our prior experience in pts with s-AML, using higher dose of cytarabine in CLIA2 for this cohort seems to have the highest impact. This trend however was also seen in the salvage and frontline cohorts when compared to the results from CLIA1. Response rates for pts in the newly-diagnosed AML, s-AML, and in the salvage settings are promising and should be explored further in larger studies and compared to current standard regimens. Disclosures Ravandi: Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Daver:Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. DiNardo:Bayer: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy. Bose:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding. Andreeff:SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Pemmaraju:abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Kadia:Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Impact of Response to Thalidomide, Lenalidomide or Bortezomib Containing Induction Chemotherapy on Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Transplantation – A Multicenter Analysis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1351-1351
Author(s):  
Farrukh Awan ◽  
Salman Osman ◽  
Samith Thomas Kochuparambil ◽  
Scot Remick ◽  
Jame Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1351 Introduction: High dose therapy and autologous transplantation (HDT-AT) has shown survival benefit for (at least) young, transplant eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Transplant ineligible patients who achieve complete remission (CR) with novel chemotherapy agents, have recently been shown to have superior overall survival (OS) (Harousseau JL. Blood:2010). However transplant eligible MM patients who have refractory disease in response to induction chemotherapy (not containing novel agents) before HDT-AT do not have inferior outcomes post-transplantation. A recent single institution, retrospective study has shown that <50% reduction in ‘serum M-protein’ following induction with thalidomide (T) or lenalidomide (L)-based induction therapies, predicts poor outcomes following HDT-AT (Gertz M, Blood:2010). These findings require further validation in order to refine patient selection for HDT-AT. We report here the impact pre-transplant remission status on outcomes of HDT-AT in MM patients receiving induction chemotherapy with novel agents. Methods: This multicenter outcomes study includes 121 consecutive patients who underwent a planned, single autograft within 1-year of starting induction chemotherapy with regimens containing T, L, or bortezomib (B), from 2003–2009. Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized using a cyclophosphamide/G-CSF combination. All patients with normal renal function received uniform conditioning with Mel200 (MEL140 if serum creatinine was >2 mg/dl). The disease response pre- and post transplant was determined by using the IMWG criteria. SPSS version 13.0 was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate OS and progression free survival (PFS). In order to assess the impact of chemosensitive disease, outcomes of patients achieving at least a partial remission (PR) (≥PR-group; n=105) before HDT-AT were compared with one not achieving at least a PR (<PR-group; n=16). We also compared outcomes of patient achieving at least a very good partial response (VGPR) (≥VGPR-group; n=48) with ones not achieving at least a VGPR (<VGPR-group; n=73). Results: The median age of the patients at transplant was 57yrs (range 35 –76yrs). Eighty (65%) patients were male. At diagnosis 84 (68%) had Salmon-Durie stage III disease, while 37 (31%) had stage I/II disease. At transplantation median Karnofsky performance status was 90, median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1–4), and 31 (25%) had received radiation previously. Median follow-up of surviving patients is 24 months. KM estimates of 3 year OS of patients in ≥PR-group and <PR-group was 74% vs. 77% (p=0.94) respectively. The 3 year PFS in similar order was 44.8% vs. 45% (p=0.87). The 3 year OS of patients in ≥VGPR-group and <VGPR-group (73% vs. 75%) was also not significantly different (p=0.83). Respective figures of 3 year PFS are 54% vs. 38% (p=0.97) respectively. Of the 53 patients that entered an HDT-AT with a PR, 23 improved to a CR post transplant, 2 improved their status to a VGPR whereas 28 remained in a PR. On the other hand of the 8 patients who entered an HDT-AT with a VGPR, 2 improved to a CR whereas the rest maintained their status. Conclusion: Our limited, multicenter retrospective outcomes data suggest that response to induction chemotherapy with novel agents may not reliably predict outcome of MM patients undergoing HDT-AT. Until data from prospective studies prove otherwise, MM patients who are refractory to therapy with T/L or B-based agents should not routinely be considered ineligible for HDT-AT. Disclosures: Abraham: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Craig:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hamadani:celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; otsuka: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) By Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Is Highly Predictive of Progression Free Survival in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 191-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Avet-Loiseau ◽  
Jill Corre ◽  
Valerie Lauwers-Cances ◽  
Marie-Lorraine Chretien ◽  
Nelly Robillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Evaluation of MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) is becoming an important trial endpoint, especially in young patients. With current intensive approaches, the complete remission (CR) rates are up to 70%, making conventional evaluations of response quite useless. More sensitive tools are mandatory. Two techniques may help investigators to reach this goal, flow cytometry (FCM) and NGS. We applied both techniques to the IFM part of the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial. Briefly, this trial enrolled 700 patients under 66 years of age who were randomized to receive either 8 cycles of VRD (Velcade®-Revlimid®-Dexamethasone) (arm A), or 3 VRD cycles, high-dose melphalan, followed by two consolidation VRD cycles (arm B). All patients received a lenalidomide maintenance for 12 months. A bone marrow MRD evaluation was planned before and after maintenance for all patients achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR). A one-mL bone marrow aspirate was sent overnight to one of the central labs. The primary purpose was to assess MRD by FCM. When extra cells were available, they were frozen as a dry pellet for NGS analyses, using the LymphoSight® platform (Sequenta/Adaptive Inc.). A total of 246 patients have been evaluated by NGS before maintenance and 178 after maintenance. Patients were classified in 3 categories: negative (< 10-6), low-positive (between 10-4 and 10-6), and positive (> 10-4). At pre-maintenance, 87 patients were negative, 80 were low-positive, and 79 were positive. At post-maintenance, these numbers were respectively 86, 52, and 40. Using a cutoff at 10-6, patients below 10-6 at pre-maintenance presented a 3-year PFS at 83%, vs 53% for patients > 10-6. At post-maintenance, these % were 90% and 59% respectively. When restricted to patients in CR, the 3-year PFS was 87% and 63% at pre-maintenance, and 92% and 64% at post-maintenance (Figure). Finally, we compared the two MRD techniques. Using a 7-color FCM strategy, the sensitivity level was 10-4. Amongst the 163 patients negative with the FCM approach, 84 (51 %) patients were positive using NGS and among 72 patients positive with FCM, 67 (93%) were also positive using NGS. In the subgroup of patients with negative MRD using FCM, the 3 year PFS was 86% for NGS negative patients vs 66 % for NGS positive at pre-maintenance and 91% vs 65% at post maintenance. Looking at high-risk patients, 26 patients with t(4;14), and 16 with del(17p) were evaluated. Half of the t(4;14) patients achieved MRD negativity, versus only 1/16 patients with del(17p). Interestingly, 9/13 patients with t(4;14) who achieved MRD negativity, and 0/1 patients with del(17p) did not relapse, showing the importance of achieving deep response in these high-risk patients. In conclusion, this study clearly demonstrates that a sensitive technique like NGS is able to predict PFS in patients treated with modern approaches. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Avet-Loiseau: Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Hulin:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arnulf:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Karlin:Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. MACRO:millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Faham:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Facon:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Takeda: Other: Adboard; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Amgen: Other: Adboard; Amgen: Other: Adboard; Novartis: Other: Adboard. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

scholarly journals Multiparametric Flow-Cytometry Is a Reliable Tool for Measurable Residual Disease Assessment and Risk-Stratification of FLT3-Mutated AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5083-5083
Author(s):  
Raffaele Palmieri ◽  
Luca Maurillo ◽  
Alfonso Piciocchi ◽  
Maria Ilaria Del Principe ◽  
Valentina Arena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Multiparametric Flow Cytometry ◽  
Reliable Tool ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease

Background: Mutations of the gene encoding Fms Related Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3), at the juxta-membrane level (ITD), represent the most common lesions found in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), identifying a subgroup of patients (pts) with unfavorable prognosis. FLT3-ITD mutations are considered an unreliable tool for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, due to their intraclonal heterogeneity and instability during the course of disease. Instead, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) may represent an alternative to monitor MRD in this molecular subset. In fact, through the recognition and monitoring of leukemia associated immunophenotypes, MFC is applicable to > 90% of AML patients with a sensitivity of 10-4. Aims: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of MFC in MRD assessment of 72 FLT3-ITD positive pts whose treatment allocation was prospectively decided according to the genetic/cytogenetic profile at diagnosis and post consolidation MRD. FLT3-ITD pts were to receive, after induction and consolidation, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT), whatever the source of stem cells. In this subgroup analysis, we investigated if FLT3-ITD mutated pts have a different propensity to achieve high quality (e.g. MRD negative) complete remission as compared to FLT3 wildtype ones. Furthermore, we seek for a correlation between different levels of MRD and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We included in the analysis 72 pts with de novo AML carrying FLT3-ITD mutations whose MRD assessment at the post-consolidation timepoint was available. Pts were defined as MRD-negative, when obtaining a residual leukemic cells count below the threshold of 3.5x10-4 (0.035%). MRD positive pts (with MRD ≥ 3.5x10-4 RLC) were stratified into 3 classes according to the levels of MRD (0.035%-0.1%; >0.1%-1%; >1%). We compared the MRD status and clinical outcome with a matched group of FLT3 wildtype AML (n = 203) treated in the same protocol. Results: Overall median age was 49 (range 18-60.9). The 2 cohorts were balanced in terms of age and sex distribution. In the FLT3-ITD group, 80/126 (64%) cases carried a concomitant NPM1 mutation vs 107/374 (28.6%) of FLT3 wildtype ones (p <0.001). Furthermore, FLT3 mutated pts had a median WBC count of 35x109/L vs 9.5x109/L of those FLT3 wildtype (p < 0.001). MRD determination after consolidation cycle was available in 72/126 FLT3-ITD pts (57%) and in 203/374 FLT3 wildtypeones (54.3%), respectively. After having received induction and consolidation course, 47/72 FLT3-ITD pts (65,2%) were submitted to allogenic stem cells transplantation (ASCT). At the post-consolidation time-point, MRD negativity rate was significantly lower in FTL3-ITD pts (27/72, 37.5%) as compared to those FLT3 wildtype (94/203, 46.3%). Furthermore, 38/72 (52.8%) and 10/72 (13.9%) FLT3-ITD pts had a level of MRD > 0.1% and > 1%, respectively as compared to 65/203 (33.0%) and 15/203 (7.4%) of FLT3 wildtypeones, respectively (p=0.017). When considering the different MRD stratification levels of FLT3-ITD pts, OS probability at 24 months was 57.2% (27 pts), 71.4% (7 pts), 53.6% (28 pts) and 20% (10 pts), for the MRD categories <0.035%, 0.035%-0.1%, >0.1%-1%, >1%, respectively (p=0.028). DFS probability at 24 months was 53.8% (27 pts), 71.4% (7 pts), 34.9% (27 pts) and 20% (10 pts), for the MRD categories <0.035%, 0.035%-0.1%, >0.1%-1%, >1%, respectively (p=0.038). Summary/Conclusion: We demonstrated that MRD determination by MFC is a reliable tool to assess remission quality and prognosis in FLT-ITD positive patients. This subpopulation shows a lower propensity to obtain a MRD negative CR, with the majority of pts maintaining an amount of MRD > 0.1% after standard treatment. Even though most of these pts were addressed to ASCT, post-consolidation MRD maintained its negative impact on OS and DFS, particularly for those pts with MRD >1%. In the attempt to improve the quality of response, prevent leukemia recurrence and pursue a durable remission, delivery of FLT3 inhibitors as a maintenance after transplant may represent a promising option. Disclosures Venditti: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buccisano:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

A Pilot Study of Acalabrutinib with Bendamustine/Rituximab Followed By Cytarabine/Rituximab (R-ABC) for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Daniel Guy ◽  
Marcus Watkins ◽  
Fei Wan ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Amanda F Cashen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Introduction The management of younger fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) varies widely with no consensus on an optimal induction therapy. To date, the treatments with the longest progression-free survival incorporate a chemotherapy backbone that includes high dose cytarabine, followed by consolidation with an autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) (Hermine et al. Lancet 2016, Eskelund et al. Br J Haematol 2016). Recent data showed that a regimen of bendamustine/rituximab followed by cytarabine/rituximab achieved high complete response rates with high minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (Merryman RW et al. Blood Adv 2020). We hypothesized that adding the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor acalabrutinib to the same chemotherapeutic backbone would be safe and increase complete response rates as well as minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity pre-transplant, and potentially improve clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a single arm, single institution pilot study registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03623373). Patients with untreated MCL, who were between ages 18-70 and were candidates for ASCT, were eligible. Patients received six 28-day cycles of treatment. Cycles 1-3 consisted of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and acalabrutinib 100mg BID on days 1 through 28. Cycles 4-6 consisted of rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, cytarabine 2 g/m2 (1.5 g/m2 if age&gt;60) q12 hours on days 1 and 2, and acalabrutinib 100mg BID on days 1 through 7 and 22 through 28. Restaging PET/CT and response assessment based on the Lugano classification were obtained following cycles 3 and 6. After cycle 6 patients underwent leukapheresis and stem-cell collection as preparation for ASCT. Blood for MRD status was collected after cycles 2, 4 and 6 and will be evaluated using the ClonoSeq assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies). The primary objective was to determine the stem cell mobilization success rate. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), pre-transplant complete response rate (CR), and the MRD negativity rate during and after completion of therapy. Results The trial enrolled 14 patients from December 2018 to February 2020. One patient withdrew consent prior to start of treatment and another was found to have an undiagnosed adenocarcinoma shortly after starting MCL treatment. Both are excluded from the analysis. The median age was 57 years (range 52-66). 11 patients were males (92%), all patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. 11 patients (92%) presented with stage IV disease. The mean MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) score was 6.3 (25% high-risk, 42% intermediate-risk and 33% low-risk). Of the 12 patients who began treatment, 9 completed all 6 cycles. Three patients did not complete therapy due to: insurance issues (n = 1), and thrombocytopenia (n = 2) following cycle 5 and 4. The side effect profile showed expected hematologic toxicities with grade 3-4 cytopenias in all patients, mostly during cytarabine cycles. In total, 100% of patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and 83% of patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. Three episodes of febrile neutropenia were observed. One patient had a grade 3 transaminase increase, and one patient had grade 3 diarrhea. No bleeding events or treatment related deaths occurred. The remainder of the side effects were low grade and the treatment was generally well tolerated. Of the 12 evaluable patients, 10 responded (ORR 83%) with 9 achieving CR (75%). One patient achieved PR prior to being removed from the study due to thrombocytopenia and then achieved CR off study. Two patients experienced PD during induction. With a median follow up of 9 months, no responding patients have relapsed. The median CD34+ stem cell collection was 3.84x106 cells/kg (range 2.77 - 5.9). MRD results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions This is the first study attempting to combine BTK inhibition with a high dose cytarabine containing regimen. The addition of acalabrutinib to a regimen of bendamustine/rituximab followed by cytarabine/rituximab appears to be safe. The R-ABC combination will be further tested in the recently activated intergroup trial EA4181. Disclosures Bartlett: Autolus: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BTG: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Fehniger:ImmunityBio: Research Funding; HCW Biologics: Research Funding; Kiadis: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Indapta: Consultancy; Wugen: Consultancy; Orca Biosystems: Consultancy; Compass Therapeutics: Research Funding. Ghobadi:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy; WuGen: Consultancy. Mehta-Shah:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Verastem: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Corvus: Research Funding. Kahl:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; Roche Laboratories Inc: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Secondary Chromosomal Abnormalities Appear to Be Less Prognostic for Children with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treated with Intensified Imatinib and Chemotherapy: Results of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Study AALL0031.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2606-2606
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Carroll ◽  
Nyla A. Heerema ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
W. Paul Bowman ◽  
Chenguang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2606 Poster Board II-582 Background: Secondary chromosomal aberrations at diagnosis occur frequently in both pediatric and adult patients with Ph+ ALL. Several studies have shown that the presence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities is a major negative prognostic factor among children and adults with Ph+ ALL. A Japanese study in adults with Ph+ ALL indicated that the adverse prognostic significance of secondary rearrangements was seen even in patients treated with imatinib-combined chemotherapy including consolidation with blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) (Haematologica 92:287, 2008). Two-year EFS in that study was 48.5±5.7%, and the 50 patients with secondary chromosomal abnormalities had a 35% - 40% lower EFS than those with t(9;22) only (p=0.003). COG AALL0031 treated children with imatinib in combination with intensive chemotherapy. This study had an overall 3 year EFS of 80±11% for those receiving chemotherapy only, an outcome similar to those receiving allogeneic BMT. We evaluated the impact of secondary chromosomal abnormalities in children and adolescents receiving this regimen. Methods: Children and adolescents (age 1–21 years) with Ph+ ALL enrolled on AALL0031 after completing 3- or 4-drug induction therapy. Imatinib was given at 340mg/m2/day for an increasing number of days in combination with an intense chemotherapy backbone. Cohort 4 received imatinib for 126 (N=12) and cohort 5 for 280 continuous days (N=50) prior to maintenance therapy. The first two cycles of the intensive chemotherapy included ifosfamide and etoposide (cycle 1) and high dose (HD) methotrexate and HD cytarabine (cycle 2). Patients were non-randomly assigned to an HLA-identical related donor BMT, if a donor was available, or to an intensive chemotherapy regimen that continued for approximately 2.2 years. Unrelated donor BMT was not allowed; these patients were taken off protocol but included in survival evaluation by an intent-to-treat evaluation. Results: Satisfactory cytogenetic results were available for 71 (76%) of 93 enrolled children. Secondary aberrations were present in 46 (65%) patients. The most frequent secondary aberrations were +der(22) (N=21), =50 chromosomes (N=14), −7/del(7p) (N=11), abnormal (9p) (N=7), and +8 (N=5). The overall 3 year CCR was 79±6% for patients in cohorts 4/5, including those with non evaluable cytogenetics (N=55). When outcome analyses were limited to Ph+ ALL patients in cohorts 4/5 (N=43), three-year CCR for patients with Ph+ alone (N=14) was 86±10% versus 71±9% for those with Ph+ and secondary abnormalities (N=29) (p=0.19). Conclusions: In this study, the lower 3 year CCR seen in patients with Ph+ ALL with secondary chromosomal abnormalities was not significantly different than for children with Ph+ alone possibly reflecting small patient numbers. The lower 3 year CCR for Ph+ ALL with secondary chromosomal abnormalities in those treated on AALL0031 (∼15% lower) appeared to be less than that seen in the previous adult trial (∼35%). This may be the result of the addition of imatinib to intensified chemotherapy reducing the poor prognostic significance of additional chromosome abnormalities seen in previous studies. Larger patient numbers and longer follow-up will be necessary to answer this question. Disclosures: Schultz: DOR Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The Addition of Thalidomide to the Induction Treatment of Newly Presenting Myeloma Patients Increases the CR Rate Which Is Likely to Translate Into Improved PFS and OS.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth J Morgan ◽  
Faith E Davies ◽  
Walter M Gregory ◽  
Susan E Bell ◽  
Alex J Szubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Patient Pathways ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 352 We present updated results from MRC Myeloma IX study evaluating the role of the addition of thalidomide to the induction and maintenance of patients with myeloma. The study ran from May 2003 – November 2007 and randomised 1,970 patients and now has a median follow up of more than 3.5 years giving it improved power to detect changes in outcome developing later after treatment. Projected median OS younger fitter patients 66 months, median OS older less fit patients 32 months. The trial comprised of 2 patient pathways, one for younger fitter patients comparing CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone) with CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone), all patients going on to receive an ASCT – median age 59 years. In older less fit patients, melphalan and prednisolone (MP) was compared to CTD attenuated – median age 73 years. In both pathways following initial treatment, eligible patients were randomised to low-dose thalidomide or no maintenance. Patient's response was monitored using electrophoresis, serum free light chain and multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytogenetics was availabel on up to 60% of cases and gene expression on a subset of these. CTD is a well tolerated regimen with a good safety profile giving excellent survivals in both groups of patients despite a small increase in risk of VTE. Using modified EBMT criteria, the addition of thalidomide to induction treatment increases both response rates and depth of response for all age groups. Preliminary results as follows: overall response: CTD vs CVAD: 91% v 82%; CR 21% v 14% and 100 days post-HDM, better responses were seen in CTD with CR rates 65% v 48%. Remission depth was also greater in CTD with more patients achieving minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry. The addition of thalidomide increases response rates overall, and particularly complete response (CR) rates (a 17% increase in CR rates post HDM, p=.006). In older/less fit patients CTDa vs MP: overall response 83% v 46%; CR 21% v 4%. Definitive results of these analyses will be presented as well as how they translate into PFS and OS and by cytogenetic subgroup. There is a substantial increase in response with the inclusion of thalidomide but at a median follow-up of three years we are not as yet seeing a substantial increase in survival in either of the two broad patient groups. We have collected data on treatment at relapse to explore how this confounds OS data. Importantly modelling analyses indicate when and to what extent, with further follow-up, the survival differences that should accrue from this increase in CR rate are likely to translate into a survival benefit. These results have a number of important implications. We show the benefit of the addition of thalidomide to myeloma treatment but also highlight the importance of later analysis of such trials because of the emergence of significant changes at these later time points. We will present full updated results from the study including the impact of thalidomide on cytogenetic subgroups and in the maintenance setting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document