LACK of ASSOCIATION BETWEEN Race and Probability of TRANSPLANT AMONG PATIENTS Referred for Hematopoietic CELL TRANSPLANTATION (HCT) for MULTIPLE Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3129-3129
Author(s):  
Manish Sharma ◽  
Michael Bromberg ◽  
Thomas R. Klumpp ◽  
Patricia Kropf ◽  
Mary Ellen Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3129 Background: As documented in recently published large database reviews, race appears to be a barrier to the access to HCT. Hypotheses as to why this may be the case include (but are not limited to): 1. patient preference; 2. delayed time to referral from community physicians to transplant centers; 3. delays in transplant once evaluated by a transplant center; 4. Possible increased prevalence of comorbidities among racial minorities referred for transplant. We attempt to address some of these issues by reviewing our 20-year experience with transplantation for multiple myeloma. Methods: We queried our core clinical database for potential associations between race and the following parameters: 1. Median interval between date of diagnosis and date of referral; 2. Median interval between date of initial visit and date of transplant 3. Probability of actually receiving a transplant following formal evaluation by a transplant physician by race; 4. Type of transplant recommended 5. Reasons for not receiving a transplant. Results: Between January 1990 and June 2011, 441 patients with multiple myeloma were referred to our center for consideration of HCT, of whom 293 (66%) were Caucasian, 94 (21%) were African American (AA), 27 (6%) were of unknown race, and 27 (6%) were of other races. The median interval from diagnosis to referral for transplant for AA patients was 145 days, versus 137 days for Caucasian patients (p=0.32). Fifty-three of the 94 AA patients (56%), versus 157 of the 293 Caucasian patients (54%) have received at least one transplant to date (p=0.72). The median interval between the date of the initial visit to our transplant center and the occurrence of an initial transplant was 120 days for AA, versus 150 days for Caucasians (p=0.39). The probability of being transplanted on an allogeneic or hybrid (auto-allo) initial transplant protocol was 0% for AA making it to transplant vs 6% for Caucasions making it to transplant (p=0.07). Reasons for not receiving a transplant are indicated in Table 1 (global p-value = 0.94). Conclusions: African American and Caucasian patients with myeloma have similar intervals from diagnosis to referral, similar intervals from referral to transplant, and are equally likely to actually receive a transplant once referral to the transplant center took place. Therefore, the reported barrier to transplantation for myeloma patients appears to be prior to referral to the transplant center. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4876-4876
Author(s):  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Ruth Pfeiffer ◽  
Robert Kyle ◽  
Jerry Katzmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4876 Background Recent studies have found obesity to be associated with a 1.5- to 2-fold elevated risk of developing multiple myeloma. This is of particular interest given that elevated levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-6 have been found in obese persons, and, at the same time, IL-6 has well-known proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects on monoclonal plasma-cells. Also insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) have been proposed to play a role since obesity often causes insulin resistance, which in turn modulates the bioavailability of IGF-1 Similar to IL-6, prior studies have found IGF-1 to have both growth and survival effects on monoclonal plasma-cells. Based on these facts, we have speculated that obesity might increase the risk of the multiple myeloma precursor monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), or, alternatively, that obesity may increase the risk for transformation from MGUS to multiple myeloma. We conducted the first large screening study designed to assess the association between obesity and MGUS among almost 2,000 African-American and Caucasian women. Methods We included 1000 African-American and 996 Caucasian women (age 40-79, median 48 years) from the Southern Community Cohort Study to assess MGUS risk in relation to obesity. Per our sampling strategy, about 50% of the participants were obese. Medical record-abstracted weight and height (measured on the day of study enrollment) and self-reported values had very high concordance (Pearson correlation >0.95). Serum samples from all subjects were analyzed by electrophoresis performed on agarose gel; samples with a discrete or localized band were subjected to immunofixation. Using logistic regression models, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) as measures of risk. Results Among all study participants, 39 (3.9%) African-Americans and 21 (2.1%) Caucasians were found to have MGUS, yielding a 1.9-fold (95%CI 1.1-2.3; p=0.021) higher risk of MGUS among African-Americans (vs. Caucasians). On multivariate analysis, we found obesity (OR=1.8, 95%CI 1.03-3.1; p=0.039), African-American race (OR=1.8, 95%CI 1.04-3.1; p=0.037), and increasing age (quartiles: ≥55 vs. <43 years) (OR=2.5, 95%CI 1.1-5.7; p=0.028) to be independently associated with an excess risk of MGUS. Another interesting finding was that the distribution of the monoclonal immunoglobulin isotype usage among African-American and Caucasian women was significantly different (p=0.007). Their respective rates were: IgG in 79.5% and 71.3 %; IgA in 7.7% and 0%; IgM in 7.7% and 19%; biclonal in 5.1% and 4.7%; and triclonal in 0% and 4.7%. The distribution of serum light-chain types between the two races was also significantly different (P=0.003, chi-square test): kappa in 53.8% and 47.6%; lambda in 43.6% and 42.8%; biclonal 2.6% and 4.7%; and triclonal in 0% and 4.7%. Conclusions Our finding that MGUS is twice as common among obese (vs. non-obese) women, and independent of race, supports the hypothesis that obesity is etiologically linked to myelomagenesis and may have public health impact. The observed 2-fold excess of MGUS among African-Americans (vs. Caucasians) of similar socio-economic status, coupled with other recent studies supports a role for susceptibility genes as the cause for racial disparity in the prevalence of MGUS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051
Author(s):  
Ahmed Y Abuabdou ◽  
Eric R Rosenbaum ◽  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Bart Barlogie ◽  
Michele Cottler-Fox

Abstract Abstract 4051 Introduction: What constitutes an acceptable mobilization regimen for collecting CD34+ cells depends on whether the goal of collection is to obtain a minimum number versus optimal number of cells. When treating patients with high-risk myeloma it may be important to obtain an optimal number. Here we compare retrospectively our earlier mobilization regimen, VTD-PACE, with MVTD-PACE in newly diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Materials and Methods : We reviewed data for all patients who collected hematopoietic progenitor cells on Total Therapy protocols TT3a/TT3b with VTD-PACE (n=394) from February 2004 to September 2008 (138 females and 256 males, median age 59y; range 31–75), and on TT4/TT5 with MVTD-PACE (n=188) from August 2008 to May 2011 (78 females and 110 males, median age 61y, range 30–76). Based on their predicted first day collection with a large volume leukapheresis (30L processed), using our center's predictive formula (Blood 2010; 116(21):1182a), patients were stratified into 4 mobilizer types: poor (<2×106 CD34+ cells/kg), intermediate (≥2 to 10×106), good (>10 to 20×106) and excellent (>20×106). Variables examined included number of CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 1 and day 2 of collection (we have a minimum 2 day collection requirement), number of collection days to reach our minimum goal of 20×106 CD34+ cells/kg, and total CD34+ cells/kg collected for both chemotherapy groups. Variables for both groups stratified by mobilizer type were compared using two-tailed student's t-tests, except for the poor mobilizer group, where population size was too small for formal statistical analyses (VTD-PACE n=7, MVTD-PACE n=4), although averages were calculated. Results : There was no significant difference between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE for CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 1 of collection among the excellent [mean 368.9 (n=184) vs. 434.6 x106 (n=92); p-value 0.07], good [mean 138.6 (n=102) vs. 128.6 x106 (n=40); p-value 0.19], and intermediate [mean 60.1 (n=100) vs. 55.9 x106 (n=52); p-value 0.39] groups. A statistically significant difference between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE was found for CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 2 of collection for excellent mobilizers [mean 333.8 (n=184) vs. 460 ×106 (n=92); p-value <0.001], but not for the good [mean 165.7 (n=102) vs. 189.5×106 (n=40); p-value 0.21] and intermediate [mean 80.1 (n=101) vs. 102.3 ×106 (n=52); p-value 0.07] groups. When CD34+ cell/kg collection totals with VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE were compared, a significant difference was seen for the intermediate mobilizer group only [mean 23.6 (n=101) vs. 26.3 ×106 (n=52); p-value 0.03]. For the poor mobilizer group, VTD-PACE had an average CD34+ cells/μl blood of 13.5×106 for day 1 of collection and 17.0 ×106 for day 2, with a total of 14.5×106 CD34+cells/kg collected; while MVTD-PACE had an average of 13.2×106 CD34+ cells/μl blood for day 1 of collection, 24.9×106 for day 2, with a total of 24.2×106CD34+ cells/kg collected. The number of collection days was similar between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE in the excellent mobilization group (2 days), but was slightly more for VTD-PACE compared to MVTD-PACE for the good (2.1 vs. 2 days), intermediate (3.2 vs. 2.9 days), and poor (6.1 vs. 5.8 days) groups. Conclusion : Both regimens allow more than minimum collections, but MVTD-PACE provides a higher peak number of CD34+ cells/μl blood, resulting in a slightly lower mean number of days of collection than VTD-PACE to reach an optimal collection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8033-8033
Author(s):  
Nathanael Fillmore ◽  
Sarvari Yellapragada ◽  
Paul S. White ◽  
Chizoba Ifeorah ◽  
Mahmoud Gaballa ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5741-5741
Author(s):  
Mikhail Yu. Drokov ◽  
Dmitry S. Tikhomirov ◽  
Larisa Kuzmina ◽  
Tatiana A. Tupoleva ◽  
Vera Vasilyeva ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the main problems in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Standard of care for CMV-disease is still ganciclovir at 10 mg/kg b.i.d. Use of non-CMV specific intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is still controversial and mostly determined by internal care protocols in every transplant center. Here we report data about impact of non-CMV specific IVIG during ganciclovir treatment in allo-HSCT CMV-patients. Patients and methods Thirty two patients with hematological malignancies transplanted in NRCH were included in this study. Detailed patients characteristics are listed in Table 1. All patients were CMV-positive by PCR (Amplisens EBV/ CMV /HHV6-screen-FL", InterLabService, Russia) and required to start therapy with ganciclovir 10 mg/kg when was included to this study. Patients in IVIG group also received non-CMV specific IVIG during ganciclovir treatment with a median total dose 20 g (7.5-90 g.). Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine probability of achievement of CMV-negativity from time of ganciclovir was started to CMV-negativity (by PCR) or last contact. The logrank test is used to compare differences between two groups. Fisher's exact test was used for 2×2 tables. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant Results Influence of IVIG in allo-HSCT patients on probability of achievement of CMV-negativity (by PCR) are shown in the Figure 1. As we can see there is no significant differences on the achievement of CMV-negativity (by PCR) in patients with/without IVIG during ganciclovir therapy. Conclusion The use of non-CMV specific immunoglobulins after allo-HSCT still lies in the plane of faith and the possibilities of the transplantation center than any evidence base. Using IVIG in patients after allo-HSCT is still not a routine in terms of CMV-reactivation/disease therapy and mostly based on an "experience" of every transplant center. According to our data there is no difference between IVIG/no-IVIG groups during ganciclovir treatment so use of IVIG, for our opinion, does not really make sense for CMV-disease treatment. Anyway a large randomized trial is required for determine indications for therapy with IVIG. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1127-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Westfall Veltri ◽  
Aaron Cumpston ◽  
Alexandra Shillingburg ◽  
Christopher Lipinski ◽  
Sijin Wen ◽  
...  

Abstract HPC mobilization with plerixafor (Plex) plus G-CSF (G+P) results in superior CD34+ cell yield, when compared to mobilization with G-CSF alone in patients with myeloma and lymphoid malignancies. However, Plex-based approaches are associated with high mobilization costs. To circumvent higher costs, several institutions use a so-called JIT approach, where Plex is only administered to patients likely to fail mobilization with G-CSF alone. Whether such a JIT-Plex approach is cost effective has not been confirmed to date. We present here, a single institution comparative analysis of 137 patients with myeloma and lymphoma who underwent mobilization with 2 different approaches of Plex utilization. Between Jan 2010-Oct 2012 (n=77) patients received mobilization G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for 5 days and Plex (0.24 mg/kg) on the evening of day four, 11 hours before apheresis the following day (G+P). To reduce mobilization costs between Nov 2012-Jun 2014 (n=60) patients were mobilized with JIT-Plex where Plex was only administered to patients likely to fail mobilization with G-CSF alone (i.e. patients with a day 4 peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ count of <10/μL, or those with day 1 yield of < 1.0 X 106 cells/kg or day 1+2 yield of <1.5 X 106 cells/kg ABW. Mobilization failure was defined as inability to collect at least 2 X 106 /kg CD 34+ cells. Patients in G+P had a higher mean peak PB CD34+ cell count (77 vs. 33.1 cells/μL, p<0.001) and a higher mean CD34+ cell yield on day 1 of collection (4.4 X 106 vs. 2.4 X 106 cells/kg ABW, p=0.0005). The mean total CD34+ cell collection was also higher in G+P (6.64 X 106 vs. 4.81 X 106 cells/kg ABW, p=0.0068). In the JIT-Plex group 41% (n=24) completed adequate HPC collection without Plex. Mobilization failure was noted in 5 patients in the G+P group (3 were salvaged with bone marrow harvest) and 2 patients in the JIT-Plex group. Two patients in either group did not proceed to AHCT as a result of mobilization failure. The mean Plex doses utilized in JIT-Plex was lower (1.3 vs. 2.1, p=0.0002), however 21% (n=16) in the G+P group completed apheresis on day 1 compared to only 6.9% (n=4) in JIT-Plex, p=0.0094. Cost analysis was estimated based on actual sales price (actual wholesale price AWP – (AWP X 0.2)) for mobilization agents and the United states (US) Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicaid Services (HHS/CMS) reimbursement rates for procedural costs associated with mobilization, apheresis or cryopreservation. The mean estimated cost was higher in the G+P group ($28,448 vs. $24,852, p=0.0315). Our analyses, for the first time confirms that mobilization with JIT-Plex allows for a safe, adequate and cost efficient strategy for HPC collection. Baseline Patent Characteristics at Time of Mobilization Table Mobilization Strategy Upfront Plerixafor + G-CSF (n=77) G-CSF + Just-in-time Plerixafor (n=60) p-value Disease Myeloma Lymphoma 46 (60%) 31 (40%) 30 (50%) 30 (50%) 0.29 Mean age, years (range) 58 (23-75) 57 (22-75) 0.45 Male gender 42 (55%) 33 (57%) 0.92 Race: Caucasian 73 (97%) 57 (98%) 1.0 Lines of prior therapy, mean 1.5 1.8 0.3 Prior Radiation 13 (18%) 12 (21%) 0.66 Mean KPS (range) 80 (70-100) 80 (60-100) 0.75 HCT-CI Score (mean) 2 2 0.36 Abbreviations: G-CSF-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim); KPS-Karnofsky performance status; HCT-CI- hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5594-5594
Author(s):  
Zahit Bolaman ◽  
Sehmus Ertop ◽  
Atakan Turgutkaya ◽  
Selim Cem ◽  
Ayse Hilal Eroglu Kucukerdiler ◽  
...  

Original versus generic lenalidomide in patients with relapsed multipl myeloma: Comprasion of effectivity and adverse events Ali Zahit Bolaman1, Sehmus Ertop2 Atakan Turgutkaya1, Cem Selim, 1 Ayse Hilal Eroglu Kucukerdiler1, Birsen Sahip2, Irfan Yavasoglu1. 1 Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Hematology AYDIN/TURKEY 2 Bulent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology ZONGULDAK/TURKEY Backround: Lenalidomide is an effective IMID derivative drug in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide is available as original and generic forms in our country. So far, there is no any clinical study comparing generic and original lenalidomine for effectivity and adverse events. We compared generic and original lenalidomide effects and adverse events (AEs) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). Methods: The patients with RMM using original or generic lenalidomide were evaluated as retrospectively. Overall response (OR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), stable disease and progressive disease rates and also for adverse events, development rates of neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anorexia, constipation diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, creatinine increase, transaminase increase, asthenia, fatigue, pyrexia, peripheral edema, upper respiratory system infection, pneumonia, another infection, muscle cramp, back pain, bone pain, muscle weakness, arthralgia, headache, tremor, paresthesia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesaemia, skin dry and skin erythema were investigated in myeloma patients. All data were analyzed using the PASW for Windows version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were described as a number, frequency, and percentage. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for the analysis of categorical data and independence between variables. The results were assessed at 95% confidence interval and p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant. Results: The number of patients using original lenalidomide was 55 and the number of patients using generic lenalidomide was 43. OR rate was 60 % versus 39.5% in patients using original and generic lenalidomide, respectively. CR rate was 14.5%, VGPR was rate 45.4% in original group while CR rate was 20.9 and VGPR 18.6 in patients using generic lenalidomide. AEs were low in original lenalidomide group than generic group. AEs were usually grade 1 or 2. Response and AEs rates are shown in Table 1. Conclusion: Our study showed original and generic forms of lenalidomide are effective for the treatment of RMM. OR rate was higher in original lenalidomide than generic lenalidomide. The AEs of original lenalidomide were lower than generic lenalidomide without statistically significance. Further studies involving a larger number of patients with RMM would be useful for comparing the efficacy and AEs of original or generic lenalidomide. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2893-2893
Author(s):  
George E. Georges ◽  
Michael B. Maris ◽  
David G. Maloney ◽  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Mohamed L. Sorror ◽  
...  

Abstract We carried out HLA-matched URD peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant in 24 pts with poor-risk multiple myeloma after nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine (90 mg/m2) and 2 Gy total body irradiation. Postgrafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The median age of the 19 men and 5 women was 53 (23 – 66) years. Conventional metaphase cytogenetics obtained in 14 pts showed Δ13 in 6 pts and complex abnormalities in 9 pts. Stage III disease was present in 83% and 17% had stage II disease. The median time from diagnosis to URD HCT was 25 (range, 8–130) months, and 96% were beyond 1st complete remission (CR) or had never achieved CR1, despite multiple lines of chemotherapy (median 4.5, range 2–10). At study entry, 17 pts (71%) had chemotherapy-refractory disease and 14 pts (58%) had failed autologous HCT. Thirteen pts had planned autologous-URD tandem HCT, while 11 proceeded directly to URD HCT. The median follow-up was 2.5 years after allografting. One pt experienced non-fatal graft rejection. The incidences of acute grades II, III and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 54%, 13% and 75%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was 22% at 2.5 years. CRs were observed in 11 pts (46%) and partial remissions (PR) in 3 (13%). Best disease responses were seen in pts given tandem autologous-URD HCT with CR in 8 pts and PR in 2 pts (77% CR+PR rate). The estimated overall survival (OS) at 2.5 years for all 24 pts was 65% and progression-free survival (PFS) 41%. Pts receiving tandem autologous-URD HCT had superior OS and PFS, 76% and 63% (Fig. A), compared to pts proceeding directly to URD HCT, 52% and 14% (Fig. B), respectively (PFS p-value=.03). Risk factors for worse OS included pts with significant medical comorbidities (p=.03), chemotherapy-refractory disease prior to HCT (p=.03), and pts who had failed autologous HCT (p=.07). Pts who failed autologous HCT had 48% OS and 30% PFS at 2.5 years. For pts with poor-risk, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, cytoreductive autologous HCT followed with nonmyeloablative conditioning and URD HCT is very promising treatment with low non-relapse mortality, high complete remission rates and prolonged PFS. The results also suggest that URD HCT may provide improved graft-versus-myeloma effect compared with HLA-matched sibling HCT without an increase in the risk of non-relapse mortality. Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4994-4994
Author(s):  
Eric W. Dean ◽  
Elad Ziv

Abstract Abstract 4994 Background: Bone destruction remains one of the major complications in Multiple Myeloma (MM) leading to morbidity and mortality. African-Americans have a higher incidence of MM but exhibit longer survivals compared to Caucasians. We analyzed bone involvement in a cohort of patients with MM to determine if non African American (non AA) vs. African American (AA) race predicts the presence and severity of bone disease at presentation. Methods: Clinical data was gathered on 197 (176 non AA and 21 AA) MM patients at the University of California, San Francisco. Each patient had a skeletal survey at diagnosis and identified as having 0 lytic lesions, 1–2 lytic lesions or 3 or more lytic lesions. The presence of compression fractures was also documented for each patient as was age and sex. Results: The presence of compression fractures strongly correlated with the number of lytic lesions in both the non AA and AA groups, with no compression fractures observed in the patients with zero lytic lesions (p<0.001). Among the AA group, there were fewer (6 of 15) patients with compression fractures compared with patients from the non AA group (92 of 161) (p=0.02). There was also a trend towards fewer lytic lesions among the AA group (p=0.053). No significant difference was observed between the extent of bone disease and age or sex between the two groups. Conclusions: Within this cohort of patients, there is a significantly lower rate of compression fractures among African-Americans. These data supports the idea that African-American patients present with less bone disease which confers a survival advantage compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3173-3173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda McLellan ◽  
Brad Pohlman ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Larry Foster ◽  
Shawnda Tench ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3173 The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute completed a pilot project on distress screening as part of the plan to address the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer requirement (Standard 3.2: Psychosocial Distress Screening) to screen malignant and benign hematology patients for distress and psychosocial health needs. Over a two week period every hematology patient seeing a physician or mid-level provider completed the distress screening instrument Emotions Thermometer (ET), a five dimensional tool that includes four predictor domains: distress, anxiety, depression, anger and one outcome domain of need for help. Each domain is rated on a 0 to 10 Likert type scale, in a thermometer format. With respect to validity and reliability, the sensitivity and specificity of the ET tool has been found comparable to known validity and reliability of other accepted measures of distress, depression, and anxiety (Mitchell, et al, 2009). Per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, a score of 4 or higher on distress screening warrants a referral to a psychosocial professional. Distress scores 4 and over were compared among the diagnoses using the Chi-Square test. When the overall P-value was significant (P <0.05), at least two groups differed, and pairwise comparisons were conducted to determine which diagnostic groups differed. Of the five thermometer domains, patients scored highest on anxiety. There were no differences among diagnoses on anger (P=0.51), but there were differences in the other four domains (P<0.001 distress, depression, and need for help; P=0.026 anxiety). For all four, pairwise comparisons indicated that multiple myeloma patients had higher (worse) scores on anxiety, distress, depression, and need for help than all other diagnoses; there were no differences among benign hematology, leukemia/MDS/CML, or lymphoma/CLL. While this pilot project does not answer why multiple myeloma patients report levels of psychosocial distress significantly higher than other hematology patients, increased attention needs to be given to address these patients' experience of anxiety, depression, and distress. This project provides valuable information about the levels of distress experienced among all hematology patients and is useful for determining staffing levels of psychosocial professionals needed to address distress. Percentage of Emotion Thermometer Scores Over 4 Diagnosis Distress Anxiety Depression Anger Help Benign Hem 18% 27% 18% 12% 7% Leuk/MDS/CML 19% 28% 17% 9% 14% Lymph/CLL 18% 31% 16% 14% 13% Myeloma 38% 44% 35% 15% 27% P-value <0.001 0.026 <0.001 0.51 <0.001 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4519-4519
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Tea Reljic ◽  
William I. Bensinger ◽  
Benjamin Djulbegovic ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4519 Background: Despite advances in our understanding of clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of multiple myeloma (MM) coupled with availability of more effective therapies, it remains an incurable disease. Combining cytoreduction from high-dose (chemo- or chemoradio-) therapy with adoptive immunotherapy forms the basis of an autologous-allogeneic (auto-allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) strategy. However, when an auto-allo HCT approach is compared to tandem autologous (auto-auto) HCT, conflicting results have been reported. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review of published studies comparing auto-auto HCT with auto-allo HCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE thru Nov 5, 2011, and pertinent conference proceedings, was conducted. Included studies allocated newly diagnosed MM patients to auto-allo HCT if an HLA-matched sibling donor was available versus auto-auto if sibling donor was not available (biologic randomization). Independent, dual data extraction was performed. Pooling of data from similar outcomes was done using the random-effects model. Results: Our search identified 152 publications, of which five (manuscript=four, abstract=one) met inclusion criteria. The five included trials enrolled 1538 patients (auto-allo=565, auto-auto=973). At least a very good partial response was assessed in one study (522 patients) and did not differ among the treatment arms [risk ratio (RR) (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87–1.09), p=0.66]; but complete remission, assessed in five studies (1130 patients), was higher in the auto-allo HCT arm [RR(95% CI) =1.65 (1.25–2.19), p=0.0005]. Event-free survival did not differ among auto-allo HCT group versus auto-auto HCT group on per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) = 0.78 (0.58–1.05)), p=0.11] of three trials (409 patients), or ITT analysis [HR(95% CI) = 0.83 (0.60–1.15), p=0.26] in three trials (1229 patients). Overall survival (OS) did not differ among these treatment arms whether analyzed on per-protocol [HR(95% CI) = 0.88 (0.33–2.35), p=0.79] in two trials (214 patients), or by ITT [HR(95% CI) = 0.80 (0.48–1.32), p=0.39] analysis in three trials (1229 patients). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was worse with auto-allo HCT [RR(95%CI) = 3.55 (2.17–5.80), p<0.00001] in four trials (1047 patients). Conclusion: Despite higher CR rates, there is no apparent improvement in OS with auto-allo HCT; but this approach results in higher NRM in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document