Use Of Nilotinib As a First Line Treatment In Adult Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive and Chronic Phase Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2742-2742
Author(s):  
Guray Saydam ◽  
Ibrahim C. Haznedaroglu ◽  
Leylagul Kaynar ◽  
Akif S. Yavuz ◽  
Ridvan Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
First Year ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction Nilotinib, a more potent and selective drug than imatinib, was approved by the FDA and EMA initially for the treatment of chronic and accelerated phase Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib and subsequently for the treatment of newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML patients in the chronic phase (CML-CP). The aim of the present study was to investigate efficacy and safety profile of nilotinib in a Turkish population of newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP patients and to evaluate the effects of these results on prognosis according to current treatment guidelines. Methods The study was planned as a multicenter, open-label, one-arm phase II clinical trial. All patients were planned to be treated with nilotinib (AMN107, Tasigna®) 300 mg BID for 24 months. Herein, efficacy results of the patients who completed the first year of the study are presented. Results Of the 112 patients included in the study, data for 94 patients who completed 12 months of the study up to April 29, 2013 were analyzed. Of these 94 patients, 16 were excluded within this period and 78 completed the first year of the study within the median 371 days (range, 339-401 days) or median 12.4 months (range, 11.3-13.4 months). General characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. Treatment-related characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 2. Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%), where appropriate. MMR (Major molecular rate): BCR-ABL/control gene ratio of ≤%0.1 measured by RQ-PCR as % CCyR (Complete cytogenetic response): Patients with 0% Ph+ metaphases Cumulative MMR rates at 3rd, 6th 9th, and 12th months of the patients are shown in Figure 1. Conclusions According to the results of interim analysis of this first prospective CML study conducted on Turkish population, the cumulative MMR rate by 12th month (primary endpoint) (61.7%) appears to be similar to that of the ENESTnd study. From the 3rd month, rapid and increasing MMR rates were reported and median time to MMR was 6.5 months. At both 6th and 12th month, high CCyR rates (both 90.5%) were also established. At all landmark evaluations, most of the patients rapidly achieved high rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses to nilotinib assessed by both 2009 and 2013 ELN optimal response criteria, and only one patient had disease progression. These results suggest that more rapid and greater efficacy was achieved with nilotinib during the 1st year of the study in comparison to historical data with imatinib and that nilotinib might improve short-term responses when started in the first-line setting. The rate of patients with BCR-ABL ≤10% at 3rd month, which is very important according to the current treatment guidelines, was 86.2%.The results of the present study revealed that efficacy of nilotinib, which is a licensed alternative for the treatment of newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP in Turkey, might provide a new standard of treatment. Disclosures: Saydam: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haznedaroglu:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yavuz:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ali:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Guvenc:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonmez:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Akkaynak:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Employment. Dag:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Employment.

scholarly journals Pegaspargase Can Safely be Administered in Adults Age 40 and Older with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3816-3816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Daley ◽  
Sridevi Rajeeve ◽  
Charlene C. Kabel ◽  
Jeremy J. Pappacena ◽  
Sarah E. Stump ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Frontline Treatment

Introduction: Asparaginase (ASP) has demonstrated a survival benefit in pediatric patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is now part of standard-of-care frontline treatment. As a result, asparaginase preparations have been incorporated into the treatment of adult ALL to improve outcomes. Pegaspargase (PEG-ASP), a modified version of asparaginase with prolonged asparagine depletion, appears to be safe in adults up to age 40 (Stock, et al., Blood, 2019), but is associated with a unique spectrum of toxicities, the risks of which appear to increase with age. Therefore, the safety of PEG-ASP remains a significant concern in older adults w/ ALL. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of pts age ≥40 years who received PEG-ASP as part of frontline induction/consolidation or reinduction, between March 2008 and June 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of PEG-ASP based on the incidence and severity of ASP-related toxicities (hypersensitivity reactions, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, pancreatitis, hypofibrinogenemia, etc) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Laboratory values recorded were either the peak or the nadir, the more appropriate for toxicity assessment, within a 4-week period following PEG-ASP administration. Secondary objectives were to determine the total number of doses of PEG-ASP administered in comparison to the number of doses intended, and to characterize the rationale for PEG-ASP discontinuation when applicable. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the incidence of PEG-ASP toxicities with respect to pt and treatment characteristics (regimen, age, BMI, gender, Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) vs. Ph-, presence of extramedullary disease, PEG-ASP dose). P values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: We identified 60 pts with ALL (40 B-ALL and 20 T-ALL) who received at least one dose of PEG-ASP. Nine pts were Ph+. The median pt age at initiation of the treatment was 53, (range, 40 to 80), and 19 pts had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Forty-four pts received treatment for newly diagnosed ALL, and 16 pts for relapsed disease. Table 1 lists pt baseline characteristics. Among the 44 pts with newly diagnosed ALL, 27 pts received PEG-ASP as part of pediatric or pediatric-inspired regimens at doses of 2000 - 2500 units/m2, and 1 pt received a modified dose of 1000 units/m2 due to age. The remaining 16 pts received PEG-ASP at doses of 1000 - 2000 units/m2 for consolidation, per established adult regimens (ALL-2 and L-20; Lamanna, et al., Cancer, 2013). Grade 3/4 ASP-related toxicities with a >10% incidence included: hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Frontline treatment regimens in which PEG-ASP was used in consolidation cycles only (ALL-2, L-20) were associated w/ a lower incidence of hyperbilirubinemia (p=0.009) and hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) compared to those regimens that included PEG-ASP during induction (pediatric/pediatric-inspired regimens) (Table 2). Younger age (40-59 vs. ≥60 years) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) and higher PEG-ASP dose (≥2000 vs. <2000 units/m2) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia and hypofibrinogenemia (p=0.002 and p=0.025, respectively). Thirty-eight pts (63%) received all intended doses of PEG-ASP. Six pts stopped PEG-ASP to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (5 in CR1, 1 in CR2), and 7 pts stopped for hypersensitivity reactions. Hepatotoxicity was the only ASP-related toxicity that led to PEG-ASP discontinuation occurring in 5 pts (hyperbilirubinemia, N=4; transaminitis, N=1). The total number of intended doses of PEG-ASP based on regimens used was 186, and 112 were administered. Conclusion: PEG-ASP was incorporated into the treatment of 60 adult ALL pts age ≥40, with manageable toxicity. Seven pts discontinued PEG-ASP due to hypersensitivity reactions and 5 discontinued due to hepatotoxicity, but other reported toxicities did not lead to PEG-ASP discontinuation and the majority of the pts completed all intended doses of PEG-ASP. This study suggests that with careful monitoring, PEG-ASP can safely be administered in adults ≥40 years of age. Disclosures Rajeeve: ASH-HONORS Grant: Research Funding. Tallman:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Geyer:Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Park:Takeda: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Response and Outcomes to Nilotinib at 24 Months in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Accelerated Phase (CML-AP) with and without BCR-ABL Mutations.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1130-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerald P. Radich ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Enrico Gottardi ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1130 Poster Board I-152 Background Nilotinib is a selective and potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, with in vitro activity against most BCR-ABL mutants (excluding T315I) indicated for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML in CPor AP resistant or -intolerant to prior therapy, including imatinib. In a previous analysis of nilotinib in patients with BCR-ABL mutations, mutations occurring at three specific amino acid residues (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V) were shown to be associated with less favorable response to nilotinib. The current analysis is based on mature data with a minimum follow-up of 24-months for all patients. Outcomes of patients at 24 months were analyzed by mutation type. Methods Imatinib-resistant CML-CP (n = 200) and CML-AP (n = 93) patients were subdivided into the following mutational subsets: no mutation, sensitive mutations (including mutations with unknown in vitro IC50). or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations at baseline. Patients with mutations of unknown in vitro sensitivity were classified as sensitive in this analysis based on a previous finding that patients with these mutations responded similarly to nilotinib as patients with sensitive mutation. Patients with baseline T315I mutations were excluded from this analysis. Patient groups were analyzed for kinetics and durability of cytogenetic and molecular response to nilotinib, as well as event-free survival (EFS), defined as loss of hematologic or cytogenetic response, progression to AP/BC, discontinuation due to disease progression, or death, and overall survival (OS). Results In CML-CP and -AP patients with no mutation, sensitive mutations, or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are provided in the Table. Overall, patients with no mutations responded similarly to patients with sensitive mutations, whereas patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had less favorable responses. This correlation was observed in both CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively. Median time to CCyR was 3.3 months (range, 1.0–26.7) for CML-CP patients with no mutations, and 5.6 months (range, 0.9–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. At 24 months, CCyR was maintained in 74% of CML-CP patients with no mutation and in 84% of patients with sensitive mutations. One patient with CML-CP and an E255K mutation achieved CCyR at 25 months and maintained until last assessment at 30 months. Median time to MMR was similar at 5.6 months (range, 0.9–25.8) for CML-CP patients with no mutations and 5.6 months (range, 2.7–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. No patient with a less sensitive mutation achieved MMR. Median EFS and 24-month estimated OS rate are provided in the Table. Conclusions Imatinib-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP patients treated with nilotinib therapy with BCR-ABL mutations (excluding E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V) achieved rapid and durable cytogenetic responses, and estimated EFS and OS at 24 months similar to that of patients with no mutations, respectively. Patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had lower and less-durable responses and shorter EFS than patients with sensitive mutations. Alternative therapies may be considered for patients with these uncommon mutations (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V). Disclosures Radich: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

A Phase III Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in Combination with Melphalan and Prednisone (MPR) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 613-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Martin Kropff ◽  
Robin Foa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 613 Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) is an oral immunomodulatory agent with clinical efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In patients with relapsed/refractory MM, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone improved time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in comparison with dexamethasone alone. In newly diagnosed MM patients, the current study compares the efficacy and safety of melphalan, prednisone and lenalidomide (MPR) with that of MP alone. Methods: Key inclusion criteria were: ≥65 years of age, newly diagnosed and symptomatic MM. 459 patients were randomly assigned to receive MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy or MPR followed by placebo maintenance therapy or MP followed by placebo maintenance therapy (Figure 1). The study induction and maintenance phases were followed by an open label lenalidomide extension and a follow-up phase. All patients received aspirin 100 mg/day as thrombo-prophylaxis. The primary endpoint of the study is progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints are OS, time-to-progression, response rate, time to response, response duration, time-to-next anti-myeloma therapy, safety, quality of life and exploratory assessment of cytogenetic abnormalities. Primary comparison is based on the intent-to-treat population comparing PFS between MPR followed by lenalidomide with MP followed by placebo; secondary comparisons are between MPR followed by lenalidomide and MPR followed by placebo, and between MPR followed by placebo and MP followed by placebo. Results: The first patient was enrolled in February 2007. A pre-planned interim analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety was performed at 50% information. An independent central adjudication committee determined the assessment and timing of progressive disease prior to the interim analysis. At the interim analysis, it was determined by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) that the study had crossed the O'Brien Fleming superiority boundary for the primary endpoint, demonstrating a highly statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients treated with MPR compared with MP as first-line treatment for MM patients. The topline results will be availabel at the time of the meeting. Conclusions: MPR is an effective and safe regimen for front-line use in MM. PFS was significantly improved in patients who received MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance compared with those who received MP followed by placebo maintenance. MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance is a new therapeutic option and can be considered a new standard for patients older than 65 years old. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for first line use in multiple myeloma. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria. Delforge:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kropff:Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Foa:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene: Employment. Herbein:Celgene: Employment. Mei:Celgene: Employment. Jacques:Celgene: Employment. Catalano:Celgene: Research Funding.

Continuous Dose Dasatinib Is Safe and Feasible in Combination with Intensive Chemotherapy in Pediatric Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL): Children's Oncology Group (COG) Trial AALL0622

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 137-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
Tamekia Jones ◽  
Elizabeth Raetz ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Speech Impairment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Altered Level ◽  
Treatment Delays ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Abstract 137 COG AALL0031 generated an outstanding 80% 3 yr event free survival for children with Ph+ ALL treated with imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the 2nd generation BCR-ABL1/SRC kinase inhibitor dasatinib would improve Ph+ ALL outcomes compared to imatinib due to increased potency, better CNS penetration, and activity against many imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 point mutations. AALL0622 tested the safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to AALL0031 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed children and young adults (1–30 years) with Ph+ ALL. Safety and feasibility were defined as >5 out of 6 patients (pts) completing 23 weeks of treatment through Intensification Block 1 without having a protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT). In Cohort 1, dasatinib (60 mg/m2 once/day) was given discontinuously (the 1st 2 weeks of every 3–4 week block) starting on Induction day 15. Enrollment in Cohort 1 continued until 6 evaluable pts completed Intensification 1 (23 weeks of therapy) and were assessed for toxicity. Two of the first 6 pts experienced DLTs (treatment delays) following the 2nd high dose methotrexate (HD MTX) given on day 15 of Intensification 1. Amendment 2 removed day 15 HD MTX in Intensification 1 and 2. After this, discontinuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) was found to be safe and feasible, and pts were then enrolled on Cohort 2 to test continuous dasatinib. The first 6 evaluable Cohort 2 pts who completed therapy through Intensification 1 with continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) had no significant treatment delays, but one pt experienced a DLT (grade 4 sensory neuropathy) during Consolidation 1. No induction deaths occurred in either cohort. The safety phase, completed in 10/2011, established the safety and feasibility of continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) integrated with the intensive phases of the modified AALL0031 backbone. After the Cohort 1 safety phase was completed, a patient developed leukoencephalopathy, transient speech impairment, motor weakness and gait disturbance after receiving HD MTX during Intensification 2. The gait and motor impairment persisted suggesting that it could be attributed to an interaction between dasatinib and HD MTX. Subsequently, no Cohort 2 pts experienced leukoencephalopathy in 70 treatment blocks containing HD MTX. Transient neurotoxicity (including ≥ grade 2 seizure, encephalopathy, cognitive disturbance, or altered level of consciousness) was seen in 8/34 (24%) Cohort 1 pts, who completed Consolidation 1 prior to Amendment 5, after receiving ifosfamide, etoposide, and triple intrathecal therapy (ITT). Because of the temporal relationship with ifosfamide and ITT, and the intensified CNS prophylaxis on AAL0622 relative to AALL0031 at the beginning of Consolidation 1, these events were attributed to the chemotherapy backbone and not dasatinib. After Amendment 5 which omitted day 1 Consolidation ITT and substituted IT MTX for ITT on Induction day 29, only 4% (1/25 pts including 4 remaining Cohort 1 and 21 Cohort 2 pts), experienced neurotoxicity (grade 2 seizure). Non-hematological Grade 4 toxicities included a Cohort 1 pt who developed Grade 4 prolonged QTc interval with adenovirus associated diarrhea, hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia during Maintenance 2. Dasatinib was held and prolonged QTc resolved. Another Cohort 1 pt developed grade 4 jaundice during Maintenance 6 that also resolved after holding 6-MP, MTX and dasatinib. Both of these pts continued therapy without recurrent toxicity. Twelve Cohort 1 pts have completed 2 1/2 years of protocol therapy and tolerated discontinuous dose dasatinib well during Maintenance. No pts have had effusions, heart failure, or pulmonary hypertension. AALL0622 enrolled 60 eligible pts (39 on Cohort 1; 21 on Cohort 2). Importantly, we recently reported that early introduction of TKI on day 15 of induction and substitution of dasatinib for imatinib on AALL0622 led to improved induction remission rates from 89% to 98% compared to all Ph+ pts on AALL0031, end induction negative minimal residual disease (MRD) rates (<0.01% by flow) from 25% to 59%, and end Consolidation 2 negative MRD rates from 71% to 89% when comparing AALL0031 Cohorts 3–5 to AALL0622 Cohorts 1 and 2. Based on the promising early response and safety data and concerns about long-term toxicity of the AALL0031 backbone, a joint COG/EsPhALL trial is underway testing the efficacy and safety of continuous dasatinib (60mg/m2) on a less intensive EsPhALL backbone. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Dasatinib is indicated for newly diagnosed adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. The effectiveness of SPRYCEL in these patients is based on a study that measured two types of response to treatment (cytogenetic and molecular) by 1 year. The study is ongoing to find out how dasatinib works over a longer period of time Dasatinib is also indicated for Ph+ CML patients who are no longer benefitting from, or did not tolerate, other treatment including Gleevec® (imatinib mesylate). Loh:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hunger:Bristol Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The Ki67/CD138 Ratio Independently Predicts Overall Survival in the Upfront Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2016-2016
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Peter Forsberg ◽  
Ihsane Ouansafi ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background: Assessment of malignant plasma cell cycling via plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) has been a validated prognostic tool in multiple myeloma (MM) but the test requires specialized technical expertise and is not widely available. Ki67 is a well-known protein marker of cellular proliferation on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with prognostic utility in other malignancies. In an effort to develop a simpler system to provide analogous information to PCLI, we used a novel IHC co-staining technique for CD138 and Ki67 to quantify plasma cells in active cycling. We then performed a retrospective analysis of the ratio of Ki67/CD138 (Ki67%) in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma receiving 1st-line therapy to correlate with clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) with treated symptomatic MM was performed by interrogation of the clinical database at the Weill Cornell Medical College / New York Presbyterian Hospital. For inclusion in the analysis, subjects must have started first-line treatment in the period of 2005-2010, and had available bone marrow biopsies. Double-staining with Ki67 and CD138 was performed by IHC. The Ki67% was calculated as the percent of plasma cells expressing CD138 that were also found to express Ki67. Treatment outcomes were stratified and compared based on %Ki67. Response was determined by monthly serum protein electrophoresis / immunofixation (IFX) with free light chain analysis according to International Multiple Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines. Pts who were IFX negative but had no subsequent bone marrow biopsy were classified as being in unconfirmed complete remission. Results: We identified 151 patients with newly diagnosed MM and available %Ki67 expression who received first-line therapy over the period of 2005-2010. Patient were subdivided into two groups based on %Ki67: Low: %ki67 <= 5%, n = 87; and High: %Ki67 >5, n=64, to allow for comparison of treatment response and survival analysis. Specific therapeutic agent exposure history did not differ significantly between patients. Both groups had similar depth of response rates (ORR) to front-line therapy, Table 1. Median progression-free survival for the high versus low %Ki67 groups approached statistical significance at 54 months (95% CI 30.8,67.4) versus 26.9 months (95% CI 21.6,40.2), respectively (P = 0.083). At data cut-off, there were 30 deaths in the low %Ki67 group (1-yr OS 93%, 5-yr OS 71%) and 36 deaths in the high %Ki67 group (1-yr OS 94%, 5-yr OS 62%). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for Ki67% <= 5% (95% CI 97.3,NR) vs. 78.9 months (95% CI 55.9,93.1) for Ki67% > 5%, (P = 0.0434), Figure 1. Multivariate cox regression for factors with influence on OS showed that only high-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17, 2.92, P = 0.027), ISS (HR 1.835, 95% CI 1.33, 3.60, P = 0.000), and %Ki67 group status had an independent effect on survival outcome. Low (<=5%) versus high (>5%) %Ki67 influenced overall survival with a hazard ratio of 1.76 (CI 1.07,2.92, P = 0.027). Survival after ASCT was significantly longer in the low %Ki67 group with median OS not reached (95%CI, 97.3, NR) versus 86.9 months (95% CI 43.9, NR) for high %Ki67 group (P = 0.04). Discussion: The ratio of IHC double positive Ki67 and CD138 of > 5% is an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in newly diagnosed MM undergoing 1st line therapy. The %Ki67 serves as a simpler and widely available analog to PCLI that can be presently performed in most hematopathology laboratories. Table 1: First Line Treatment and Best Response (modified IMWG Criteria) Ki67% <= 5(N = 87)n (%) Ki67% > 5(N = 64)n (%) P Treatment Exposure* Lenalidomide 59 (67.8) 48 (75) 0.34 Thalidomide 30 (34.5) 14 (21.9) 0.09 Bortezomib 25 (28.7) 14 (21.9) 0.34 Alkylating agent 11 (12.6) 4 (6.3) 0.19 ASCT 27 (31) 22 (34.4) 0.66 Best Response Overall Response (>= Partial response) 77 (88.4) 57 (89.1) 0.41 Complete response 15 (17.2) 22 (34.4) Unconfirmed complete response** 14 (16.1) 8 (12.5) Very good partial response 23 (26.4) 15 (23.4) Partial response 25 (28.7) 12 (18.8) Stable disease 9 (10.3) 5 (7.8) Progressive disease 1 (1.2) 2 (3.1) * Percentages do not add to 100% due to instances of concurrent therapy use ** Unconfirmed complete response: immunofixation negative, but no confirmatory bone marrow biopsy available Figure 1 Overall Survival by %Ki67 Figure 1. Overall Survival by %Ki67 Disclosures Mark: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Perry:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Coleman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria. Niesvizky:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals The Outcome of Treatment-Free Remission after First-Line Nilotinib or Dasatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Different

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2552-2552
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
French Group ◽  
Treatment Free Remission ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims: The absolute number of chronic phase CML patients (pts) reaching the treatment-free remission (TFR) criteria has been substantially increased by the use of second-generation TKI (TKI2), initiated since diagnosis, comparing to Imatinib first-line. However, the relative rate of unsuccessful TFR (i. e. pts loosing their MMR after TKI2 cessation) still remains around 50% at 2 years and beyond, whatever the TKI2 was. The aim of this study is to analyse the rate of successful TFR in pts receiving Nilotinib (Nilo) or Dasatinib (Dasa) first-line obtaining the appropriate criteria. Methods: Observational retrospective study in 3 reference centers of the French group of CML lead between 2010 and 2021. Eligible pts were CP CML pts initiating either Nilo 300 mg BID or Dasa 100 mg daily since diagnosis, until cessation for sustained MR4.5 (i.e. ≥2 years on ≥4 datapoints). Data were retrospectively collected according to the national regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2009, 2013 and 2020 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) for TFR. In this regard, the TKI2 was resumed in case of loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. All patients were harbouring major BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the survival without loss of MMR after TKI2 cessation. The secondary endpoints were the kinetics of MMR loss, and the identification of factors influencing MMR loss. Results: Seventy-two pts were reported (47 Nilo, 25 Dasa) with 57% females with a median age at diagnosis of 48 (36.75-61.25) years. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 9.26 (3.75-13.75) years (8.8 for Nilo and 9.47 for Dasa p=ns) and after TKI2 cessation 3.94 (0.7-8.8) years (3.92 for Nilo and 3.90 for Dasa p=ns). Sokal scores were 42% Low, 41% Intermediate, 17% High in Nilo and 39% L, 25% I and 35% H in Dasa pts (p=ns). ELTS scores were 50% L, 22% I, 9.5% H (18.5% Uk) in Nilo and 46.5% L, 28.5% I and 3.5% H (21.5% Uk) in Dasa pts (p=0.95). Five (9%) pts harboured ACA at diagnosis in the Nilo group and 2 (7%) in the Dasa group (p=1.00). The median time from TKI2 initiation to sustained MR4.5 was 19 (3.12-36) months in the Nilo group and 16 (6.3-39) months in the Dasa group (p=0.644). The duration of sustained MR4.5 until cessation was 3.04 (1.5-9.3) years for Nilo and 2.65 (1.11-7.95) for Dasa (p=0.96). The median dosing of Nilo was 600 (300-800) mg daily and 80 (20-100) mg at TKI2 cessation. None of these patients switched to another TKI during the follow-up. TKI2 cessation occurred after 60.5 (43-74.5) months in the Nilo group and 68 (39-90) months in the Dasa group (p=0.581). Thirty-seven pts out of 47 (79%) were BCR-ABL1 undetectable at Nilo cessation 18/25 (72%) at Dasa cessation (p=0.60). At M3 after discontinuation, 58% of pts remained undetectable after Nilo cessation and 30.4% after Dasa cessation (p=0.05).The median survival of pts without loss of MMR was not reached in the Nilo group, and was 14 (4.73-NR) months in the Dasa group, (p=0.042) as analysed by the KM method (Figure 1.). Two patients died (1 Nilo, 1 Dasa) from competing events (solid tumours) after unsuccessful TFR. Twenty-eight pts (14 Dasa, 14 Nilo) restarted their TKI2 after MMR loss and all regained ≥ MMR after 3 months of Dasa at a median dose of 75 (40-100) mg daily and all except one (who regained MMR at M12) after resumption of Nilo at a median dose of 350 (300-600) mg daily. Univariate analysis identified pts with H+I Sokal (as compared to low) as an unfavourable factor for successful TKI2 cessation [HR=0.35 (0.15-0.83), p=0.017] and type of TKI2 (Nilo as reference vs Dasa) was discriminant [HR=2.1 (1.01-4.35), p=0.047]. Multivariate analysis identified the type of TKI2 as a significant factor impacting on TFR outcome [HR 2.11 (0.97-4.55], p=0.05]. Conclusions: As it is likely that no prospective head-to-head comparison will be performed in this setting, on this limited series of pts, we conclude that the outcome of TFR seems to be different according to the TKI2 used since diagnosis, suggesting the impact of distinct biological variables modified by the type of TKI2 on the long run (such as immunological system, BM micro-environment, others) on TFR outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Assessment of Quality of Life in the NCRI Spirit 2 Study Comparing Imatinib with Dasatinib in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Labeit ◽  
Mhairi Copland ◽  
Leanne M. Cork ◽  
Corinne A. Hedgley ◽  
Letizia Foroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Well Being ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Imatinib and dasatinib are established drugs in the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Several studies, including SPIRIT2 have shown that first-line dasatinib (100mg once daily) has a superior complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rate compared to imatinib (400mg once daily), but no significant differences in progression-free or overall survival have been shown in any study. To date, there has been no direct comparison of quality of life (QoL) using generic and cancer-specific instruments for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML with imatinib and dasatinib. SPIRIT2 (STI571 Prospective International Randomised Trial 2) is the first randomized clinical trial to incorporates generic and cancer-specific QoL measurement for first-line therapy. Methods: Quality of life is a secondary endpoint in the SPIRIT2 trial and has been assessed at baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months post trial entry and thereafter annually. The EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI have been used as QoL measures in this trial. The FACT-G covers cancer-specific QoL measure dimensions such as physical well-being, functional well-being, social and family well-being, emotional well-being and the FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI different subsets of them. The QoL scores (EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM, FACT-TOI) were calculated at different time points and comparison of the mean scores for both treatment groups was made. Results: A comparison between imatinib and dasatinib shows no significant difference in QoL in generic instruments and also in cancer-specific instruments. EQ-5D was 0.77 and 0.79 at baseline and 0.80 and 0.82 at one year for dasatinib and imatinib, respectively (2-3 basis points increase over 1 year). Similar results were obtained for the FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI. There was a slight increase for the FACT-G (4-5 basis points), FACT-TOI (3-4 basis points) and FACT-BRM (8-10 basis points) after 1 year for both treatments, but this difference was not significant. The effects on the well-being and the emotional dimensions have been analysed for both drugs and there was no change over time, demonstrating results similar to the imatinib arm of the IRIS trial. Conclusions: Standard dose imatinib and dasatinib are both used as first-line treatments for CML and, despite different side effect profiles, there is no significant difference in QoL using the instruments described here between these two drugs over time. These data will allow the derivation of utility values to contribute to future health economic/technology appraisals. Additional analyses of how generic and cancer-specific measures of different QoL instruments change in CML patients over time in those patients that develop side effects, e.g. fluid retention with imatinib or pleural effusion with dasatinib will be presented. Disclosures Copland: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cork:BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Hedgley:Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gills:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Holyoake:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bescoby:Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pzifer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Brien:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pzifer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals First-Line Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 48-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Gaelle Fossard ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction Up to 10% of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are already in accelerated phase (AP) at diagnosis and despite treatment advances in the field of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), management of these pts is challenging. This study aims to examine the benefit of second generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI2) as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed AP-CML. Methods Pts meeting criteria for AP-CML at diagnosis and treated with first-line TKI2 (i. e. Nilotinib or Dasatinib) were included in this retrospective multicenter observational national study. AP-CML were defined according to the ELN (Baccarani, Blood 2013) as hematological acceleration (HEM-AP, any of the following features: blasts in PB or marrow 15-29%, or blasts+promyelocytes in PB or marrow >30% with blasts <30%, basophils in PB ≥20%, or persistent thrombocytopenia <100×109/L (unrelated to therapy) and/or chromosomal abnormalities in addition to the Ph at diagnosis (ACA-AP). Pts initiated nilotinib at 6-800 mg BID or dasatinib at 100-140 mg QD with further dose adaptations according to toxicities or response. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and failure-free survival [FFS= progression to blast crisis, death, loss of any previous response (CHR, CCyR, or MMR) discontinuation of TKI2 for toxicity], were analysed since TKI2 initiation in intention-to-treat. Results Sixty-six pts were analysed: 45 males (68%) and 21 females (32%) with a median age at diagnosis of 49 (15-78.5) years. The median follow-up of the cohort was 43.5 (1.7-117) months. We segregated the pts in HEM-AP (n=33) and ACA-AP (n=33) for further analyses. Nine pts with HEM-AP harboured ACA and were analysed in the HEM-AP group. Fusion transcripts were of the Major BCR in 57 pts, 6 pts had atypical BCR-ABL transcripts (2 e19a2, and 1 e1a2 in the HEM-AP group and 2 e19a2 and 1 Ma3 in the ACA-AP group), and 3 transcripts unknown. Not surprisingly, spleen enlargement was significantly greater in the HEM-AP group [10 (5-14.75) vs. 3 (0-10)cm, p=0.014]. PB basophils [median 10 (6-16) vs. 3 (2-5)%, p <0.001], PB blasts [median: 12.05 (7.5-15) vs. 1.5 (0-4)%, p<.001], as well as PB blasts+promyelocytes [median 14 (11-20) vs. 4 (1-7)%, p<.001]. Hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in the HEM-AP group [median 93 (6-113.5) vs 120 (100-134) g/L, p<0.001]. Neither WBC counts, platelets counts, nor BCR-ABL/ABL load differed significantly between the 2 groups. In the ACA-AP group, 10 (30%) pts harbored major route ACA and 23 (70%) pts harbored minor route ACA of whom 3 pts with i(17q) and 1 with 7q abnormalities. In the ACA-AP group, Sokal score was low in 42%, intermediate in 32% and high in 26% of pts (2 pts unknown). Dasatinib was initiated in 19/33 pts (57.5%) in the HEM-AP group and in 8/33 pts (24%) in the ACA-AP group. Treatment responses did not significantly differ between ACA-AP and HEM-AP group, regardless of the TKI2 administered, with 33/33 (100%) vs 31/33 (94%) pts achieving a CHR, 2/33 (6%) pts vs 0/33 (0%) pts achieving a MCyR, 5/33 (15%) pts vs 5/33 (15%) pts achieving CCyR, 9/33 (27%) pts vs 4/33 (12%) pts achieving a MMR respectively. However, 11/33 (33%) HEM-AP vs 22/33 (66%) ACA-AP pts achieved a deep molecular response (p=0.013, Fisher test). Median times to CHR and MMR were not significantly different between ACA-AP group and HEM-AP group with 1.05 vs 1.25 months (p=0.088) for CHR and 6 vs 7 months (p=0.156) for MMR, respectively. Overall, the estimated 7-yr FFS rate was 56.92% (95%CI: 40-81), 7-yr PFS was 83.42% (95% CI: 69.6-100%) and 7-yr OS was 87.14% (95%CI: 73.5-100%) (Figure 1.) with no significant differences between ACA-AP vs HEM-AP pts [7-yr FFS: 57.7 vs. 62%, p=0.739; 7-yr PFS: 84.7% vs. 84%, p=0.185; 7-yr OS: 88.9% vs 86.6%, p=0.132] respectively. There was also no difference in FFS, PFS and OS according to the type of TKI2. The only factors influencing negatively OS were the % of BM blasts (HR=1.17, 95%CI: 1.1-1.28, p<0.001) and the % of BM blasts+promyelocytes (HR=1.14, 95%CI: 1.06-1.22, p<0.001). We identified too few significant factors in univariate analysis to perform a multivariate analysis. Conclusion The initiation of a TKI2 in newly diagnosed AP-CML pts induces excellent response and survival rates, probably superior to that of Imatinib first-line, and counterbalances the negative impact of this advanced disease, particularly in HEM AP subgroup. Disclosures Etienne: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Speakers Bureau. Berger:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mahon:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Nicolini:BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A Novel Approach to Identify a Putative Leukemia Stem Cell Population in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) and Distinguish Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL from Lymphoid Blast Crisis Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2912-2912
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Gerber ◽  
Lawrence J. Druhan ◽  
David Foureau ◽  
Elizabeth Jandrisevits ◽  
Amanda Lance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Aldh Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Recent evidence supports the clinical significance of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the identification of LSCs in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) has proved challenging, as transplantation studies in immunocompromised mice have yielded conflicting results. The distinction between Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL and lymphoid blast crisis (LBC) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is also controversial. We previously identified a clinically relevant CD34+CD38- population of LSCs with intermediate (int) levels of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity (CD34+CD38-ALDHint) in AML [Gerber, et al. Blood, 2012]. This population was not present in healthy controls and could be distinguished from normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which had higher levels of ALDH activity (CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh). We hypothesized that the same approach could be used to identify a putative LSC population in ALL. Furthermore, in contrast to most cases of AML, the chronic phase CML stem cell was found to reside in the same CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population as normal HSCs [Gerber, et al. Am J Hematol, 2011]. We therefore also hypothesized that the presence of BCR/ABL mutations in the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population might help distinguish LBC CML from Ph+ ALL. Methods: Bone marrow and/or peripheral blood specimens were collected at diagnosis from patients with B cell ALL or LBC CML on an IRB-approved protocol. A total of 7 patients were evaluated: 2 Ph- ALL, 2 Ph+ ALL, and 3 LBC CML patients. CD34+ cells were isolated by magnetic bead and column selection, then analyzed by flow cytometry with respect to CD38 expression and ALDH activity. Sorted cell populations were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for leukemia-specific abnormalities. Polymerase chain reaction was performed on clinical samples to determine the presence of a p190 vs. p210 transcript. Results: All patients harbored an aberrant CD34+CD38-ALDHint population, similar to that previously seen in AML. This population was ≥95% positive for BCR/ABL by FISH in all Ph+ ALL and LBC CML cases. It was similarly positive (≥75%) for other leukemia-specific FISH abnormalities (including trisomy 4, 8, 10, 12, and/or 21) in all four ALL cases, as well as one LBC CML case. Conversely, the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population (which typically contains the normal HSCs) lacked any of the other cytogenetic abnormalities in all of the cases, irrespective of Ph status or a diagnosis of ALL vs. CML. Notably, the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population was negative for BCR/ABL in the Ph+ ALL cases but was >95% positive for BCR/ABL by FISH in the LBC CML cases. The B cell differentiation marker, CD19, was expressed on the CD34+CD38-ALDHint but not the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population in all ALL cases, both Ph- and Ph+. In contrast, CD19 expression was variable in the LBC CML cases. Both Ph+ ALL cases possessed a p190 BCR/ABL transcript, whereas all of the LBC CML cases contained a p210 transcript. Also of note, the CD34+CD38-ALDHint population was persistently detectable in one of the LBC CML patients while in complete remission after induction therapy; that patient subsequently relapsed. Conclusions: An abnormal CD34+CD38-ALDHint population was identified in all cases of B cell ALL and LBC CML. This population is analogous to a previously identified, clinically relevant LSC population in AML and may represent a putative LSC population in ALL. The CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population was normal by FISH in the ALL cases but contained the BCR/ABL mutation in the LBC CML cases, thus permitting distinction between Ph+ ALL and LBC CML (which also differed based on the presence of p190 vs. p210 transcripts, respectively). Additionally, clonal evolution from chronic phase to lymphoid blast crisis CML was apparent, based on the acquisition of additional cytogenetic abnormalities unique to the CD34+CD38-ALDHint population as compared to the CD34+CD38-ALDHhigh population. The presence of CD19 on the putative LSCs in the four cases of ALL suggest that CD19-directed therapies may target the LSCs and thus may have curative potential in those cases. This assay may serve as a means to evaluate other possible therapeutic targets. Lastly, the detection of the abnormal CD34+CD38-ALDHint population may have utility as a minimal residual disease assay for monitoring response to treatment. These findings warrant validation in a larger patient cohort. Disclosures Gerber: Janssen: Research Funding; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grunwald:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding. Avalos:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document