Changing The Treatment Paradigm For Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients With Del(17p) Karyotype

Abstract CLL patients (pts) with del(17p13.1) (17p-) karyotype typically have poor response to therapy and dismal clinical outcomes. We describe the success of treatment of 17p- pts on clinical trials at Ohio State University (OSU) with regimens based on 1 of 2 novel agents [ibrutinib (IB; an oral inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase) or one of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi; alvocidib, dinaciclib, or TG02)]. We retrospectively reviewed records of 174 CLL pts with 17p- who received therapy prior to 1st treatment at OSU (OSU Tx1) from 2002-2013. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from date of OSU Tx1 until progression/death, censoring pts at date of second treatment prior to progression or last contact if alive and progression free. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of OSU Tx1 until date of death. Pts who received transplant or later IB were censored at that time; otherwise pts were censored at last follow-up or 48 mos if still alive. PFS/OS estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Proportional hazard models were fit with treatment group and adjusted for other prognostic variables (p<0.05). Median time from CLL diagnosis to OSU Tx1 was 5.6 yrs and median number of prior therapies was 3 (range: 1-10). At OSU Tx1, median age was 63 yrs (39-83), 66% were male, and 93% were Caucasian. ECOG performance status (PS) was 0, 1, and 2/3 in 28%, 60%, and 11% of pts, respectively, and 71% had Rai Stage 3/4. In addition to 17p-, 21%, 57%, and 16% of pts harbored 11q-, 13q- and tri(12) aberrations, while 70% had complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 abnormalities including 17p-). At OSU Tx1, 16% (n=27), 33% (n=58), and 51% (n=89) of pts received an IB-based therapy, CDKi-based therapy, or other therapies (O), respectively. Clinical and molecular characteristics were not statistically different across groups except the IB and CDKi groups had more pts with ≥3 prior therapies (70% in IB vs 64% in CDKi vs 42% in O, p=0.005) and the median white blood cell count (WBC) was lowest in the CDKi group [18.8 in IB vs 25.5 in O vs 12.1 in CDKi, p=0.04]. The degree of response to OSU Tx1 was significantly different among groups (p=0.007), where 56%, 45%, and 24% of pts in the IB, CDKi, and O groups, respectively, achieved at least a partial response, and 85%, 64%, and 53% achieved at least stable disease. As shown in Figure 1A, PFS was significantly extended with IB and CDKi compared to O (p<0.0001), and PFS was longer with IB compared to CDKi (p=0.002); 12 mos estimates were 77% (95%CI=0.56-0.89), 38% (95%CI=0.25-0.52), and 17% (95%CI=0.10-0.26) in the IB, CDKi, and O groups, respectively. As shown in Figure 1B, OS was significantly different among the IB, CDKi, and O groups (p=0.02), with 12 mos estimates of 81% (95%CI=0.61-0.92), 78% (95%CI=0.64-0.87), and 58% (95%CI=0.46-0.68). OS was extended with IB and CDKi compared to O (p=0.01 and p=0.04, respectively), although by 48 mos, estimates for CDKi and O were similar. With a median follow-up of 12 mos, no large differences between IB and CDKi were yet observed (p=0.49). In multivariable analysis, treatment group was significantly associated with achieving at least partial response (p=0.0005) independent of number of prior therapies and presence of 13q-. The odds of response were higher with IB and CDKi compared to O, but not significantly different between IB and CDKi (all pairwise odds ratios (OR): IB vs O=5.66 (95%CI=2.12-15.08); CDKi vs O=3.38 (95%CI=1.57-7.31); IB vs CDKi = 1.67 (95%CI=0.65-4.32)]. Treatment group was significantly associated with PFS (p<0.0001) independent of number of prior therapies, albumin, and CK. The risk of progression/death decreased by 90% and 60%, respectively, with IB or CDKi compared to O (all pairwise hazard ratios (HR): IB vs O=0.10 (95%CI=0.04-0.22); CDKi vs O=0.40 (95%CI=0.27-0.60); IB vs CDKi = 0.24 (95%CI=0.11-0.55)]. Treatment group was significantly associated with OS (p=0.003) independent of number of prior therapies, albumin, CK, ECOG PS, and WBC. The risk of death decreased by 73% and 47%, respectively with IB and CDKi compared to O (all pairwise HR: IB vs O=0.27 (95%CI=0.11-0.66); CDKi vs O=0.53 (95%CI=0.31-0.89); IB vs CDKi=0.52 (95%CI=0.21-1.30)]. Notably, age did not correlate with response, PFS, or OS. Treatment of 17p CLL pts with IB and CDKi at OSU have demonstrated improved response, PFS, and OS. These novel therapies provide hope for patients with a karyotype historically associated with dismal clinical outcomes. Disclosures: Jones: Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Byrd:Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Patterns of Care and Outcomes Among Older Patients with Myelofibrosis: A Population-Based Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137543 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 21-22

Author(s):

Shelby Meckstroth ◽

Rong Wang ◽

Xiaomei Ma ◽

Nikolai A. Podoltsev

Keyword(s):

Median Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Population Based ◽

Janus Kinase ◽

Patterns Of Care ◽

Age At Diagnosis ◽

Jak Inhibitor ◽

Risk Of Death

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with systemic and splenomegaly-related symptoms, cytopenias and decreased survival. Approval of ruxolitinib, an oral janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitor, for higher-risk MF patients (pts) by the Food and Drug Administration in 11/ 2011 opened a new era of targeted treatment for this disease. There are limited data on the "real-world" clinical experiences and outcomes of pts with MF treated in the JAK inhibitor era. MF became reportable to population-based cancer registries including the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program in 2001, making its investigation possible at the population level. The objective of this study was to assess the patterns of care and outcomes of older MF pts in the ruxolitinib era. Methods: Using the linked SEER-Medicare database, we identified a cohort of older pts diagnosed with MF from 2007 through 2015 who fulfilled the following eligibility criteria: 1) aged 66-99 years at diagnosis; 2) had known month of diagnosis; 3) were not identified from death certificate or autopsy only; 4) had continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B and no enrollment in health maintenance organizations from 1 year before diagnosis until the end of follow-up (death or 12/31/2016, whichever came first); 5) had continuous enrollment in Medicare Part D from diagnosis until the end of follow-up; and 6) bone marrow biopsy claim from 1 year before diagnosis to end of follow up. Treatments were assessed via Medicare parts B&D claims. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare survival between patient groups. Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the effect of ruxolitinib use on survival in MF pts. Aside from treatment, we considered the influence of several characteristics on survival, including age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, comorbidities, SEER region and percentage living in poverty at the census tract level. Results: Among 528 MF pts, median age at diagnosis was 76 (interquartile range [IQR], 71- 80) years with 88.8% white and 56.1% male. 230 pts were diagnosed in the early era (2007-2011), and 298 in the late era (2012-2015), of which 113 (37.9%) were ruxolitinib users. There was no difference among any evaluated characteristics between two eras and by ruxolitinib status in the late era. The median duration of ruxolitinib use was 11.9 months. Similar number of pts started at 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg twice a day (BID) (Figure 1). Among 31 pts who started at ≤5 mg BID, 15 (48.4%) never had their dose of ruxolitinib escalated. While on ruxolitinib treatment, nearly half of the pts received additional medications for symptom management including hydroxyurea (22.6%), prednisone (17.9%) or both (10.4%). < 11 users were able to go up to the highest dose of 25 mg BID. Ruxolitinib was interrupted > 30 days for 31 times by 20 of 113 (17.7%) pts with median interruption duration of 43 (IQR 34-71) days. The median survival was 2.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.87-3.41) years and 2.62 (95% CI: 2.15-3.07) for the early and late era pts, respectively (p for log-rank 0.91). The multivariable analysis showed no impact of diagnosis era on survival (late vs early era hazard ratio (HR) of 1.08, 95% CI 0.83-1.40; p= 0.57). There was no difference in survival by ruxolitinib status (log-rank test, p=0.31), with a median survival of 2.76 (95% CI: 2.01-4.15) years and 2.53 (95% CI: 1.92-3.07) years among users and non-users, respectively (Figure 3). In the multivariable analysis, the risk of death among ruxolitinib users compared to non-users was not statistically significant with HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0. 59-1.16; p= 0.26). Conclusions: Older MF pts treated with ruxolitinib had similar survival when compared to pts who did not receive this medication, but the choice of ruxolitinib might have been influenced by disease risk which we were unable to assess. For many ruxolitinib users, the drug was interrupted, the dose was not escalated, additional medications were used concurrently (possibly to help control disease manifestation), and treatment was discontinued quickly after initiation. Optimization of ruxolitinib use may be necessary to accomplish better outcomes. Furthermore, development of new drugs which may be used together with ruxolitinib or after its discontinuation is needed. The work was supported by The Frederick A. Deluca Foundation. Disclosures Wang: Celgene/BMS: Research Funding. Ma:Celgene/BMS: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Podoltsev:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Research Funding; CTI biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Durable Responses in Fit Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in a Randomised, Fludarabine-Based, Immunochemotherapy Dose De-Escalation Study - Long-Term Follow-up By Treatment Arm and Mutational Status

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114064 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4432-4432

Author(s):

Stephen P. Mulligan ◽

Devinder Gill ◽

Gavin Cull ◽

Leanne Berkahn ◽

David Simpson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Hematological Toxicity ◽

Early Stopping ◽

Full Dose ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Mutational Status ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND: Immunochemotherapy (ICT) with fludarabine (F), cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) provides prolonged progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in fit younger patients with CLL. The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) CLL5 study previously showed FCR based therapy was safe, tolerable and effective in fit older CLL patients. We now assess the PFS and OS status by treatment arm and mutational status after a minimum of 5 years following final recruitment. METHODS: Previously untreated patients with progressive CLL aged ≥65 were randomised to one of three treatment regimens FR5, FCR3 and FCR5 (= full dose) as follows: (i) F 24mg/m2 po D1-5 + R (375mg/m2 C1, 500mg/m2 C2-6) iv D1 (FR5), (ii) F 24mg/m2 po and C 150mg/m2 po D1-3 + R iv D1 (FCR3) or (iii) F 24mg/m2 po+ C 150mg/m2 po D1-5 + R iv D1 (FCR5), all given at 4 weekly intervals for an intended 6 cycles. Early cessation of therapy was mandated for grade 3+ toxicity that delayed the next cycle >2 weeks on >2 occasions. RESULTS: The ITT population comprised 119 patients: 40 female and 79 male. Mean age was 71.6 years (range 64-83). The distribution by treatment arm was even with 38 patients on FR5, 41 on FCR3, and 40 on FCR5. As previously presented (ASH 2014), the overall response rate (ORR) was comparable at 95%, 95% and 97%, and the bone marrow confirmed complete remission (CR) rates 27%, 44% and 44% respectively. ORR and CR were not statistically significant. Toxicity was tolerable, and mainly hematological with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Early stopping due to toxicity occurred in 5.6%, 2.4% and 34% respectively, mainly hematological toxicity without complications. After a minimum of 5 years follow-up, no significant difference by OS (p=0.48) or PFS (p=0.93) (figure 1) was seen by treatment arm. Overall 51 patients (of 117 - 43.6%) died, hence the survival rate was 56.4%. Causes of death by treatment arm for FR5, FCR3 and FCR5 respectively were disease progression 4, 4, 1; Richter transformation 2, 0, 0; infection 2, 0, 7; and second malignancy 2, 4, 4. Of the 119 patients, 61 (51%) had data on immunoglobulin variable gene (IGHV) mutational status. In 33 (54%), IGHV were mutated (M-CLL) and 28 (46%) had unmutated IGHV (UM-CLL). The distribution by mutation status by treatment arm was even, with 10 each in FR5 and FCR3 and 13 in FCR5. Patients with M-CLL had a 61% lower risk of death and a significantly better PFS (p=0.0079; HR 0.39 [95% CL, 0.19 to 0.80]) than UM-CLL (M-CLL median PFS 110 months vs UM-CLL median PFS 48 months) (figure 2). CONCLUSIONS: Oral F(C)R therapy is generally safe and well tolerated in CLL patients aged ≥65 years requiring first-line treatment, when early stopping is utilized if prolonged toxicity is encountered; one third on full dose FCR5 stopped early with this rule, mainly with neutropenia. Response rates were high with ORR of 96% and CR rate of 56%. After a minimum of 5 years follow-up, OS and PFS outcomes by the treatment arms FR5 (full dose F, no C), FCR3 (40% FC dose reduction) and FCR5 (full-dose FCR) are essentially identical in this randomized dose de-escalation study. The median PFS overall was 53 months. CLL patients with M-CLL had a significantly superior PFS compared to UM-CLL. Disclosures Gill: Janssen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau. Cull:Takeda Australia: Other: Travel Expenses; Amgen Australia: Other: Travel Expenses; AbbVie (Australia): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Simpson:Novartis: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Sanofi: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; MSD: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Travel funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria, Other: Travel funding; Beigene: Honoraria, Other: Travel funding. Badoux:Roche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Early Bone Metastases are Associated with Worse Outcomes in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Bladder Cancer ◽

10.3233/blc-200377 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Ariel A. Nelson ◽

Robert J. Cronk ◽

Emily A. Lemke ◽

Aniko Szabo ◽

Ali R. Khaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Metastases ◽

Urothelial Carcinoma ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

De Novo ◽

Opioid Analgesic ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽

Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with early bone metastases (eBM) vs no early bone metastases (nBM) have not thoroughly been described in the age of immuno-oncology. OBJECTIVE: To compare survival and other clinical outcomes in patients with eBM and nBM. METHODS: We used a multi-institutional database of patients with mUC treated with systemic therapy. Demographic, metastatic site, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square tests were performed. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method; multivariable Cox analysis was performed. RESULTS: We identified 270 pts, 67%men, mean age 69±11 years. At metastatic diagnosis, 27%had≥1 eBM and were more likely to have de novo vs. recurrent metastases (42%vs 19%, p < 0.001). Patients with eBM had shorter overall survival (OS) vs. those with nBM, (6.1 vs 13.7 months, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, eBM independently associated with higher risk of death, HR = 2.52 (95%CI: 1.75–3.63, p < 0.0001). OS was shorter for patients with eBM who received initial immune checkpoint inhibitor vs platinum-based chemotherapy, (1.6 vs 9.1 months, p = 0.02). Patients with eBM received higher opioid analgesic doses compared to patients with nBM and received quantitatively more palliative radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mUC and eBM have poorer outcomes, may benefit less from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and represent an unmet need for novel therapeutic interventions. Dedicated clinical trials, biomarker validation to assist in patient selection, as well as consensus on reporting of non-measurable disease are required.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Association of Patient Safety Indicator 9 (Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma) and clinical outcomes in Cardio-thoracic surgery hospital, Ain Shams University, Egypt

QJM ◽

10.1093/qjmed/hcab118.009 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mahi M Al-Tehewy ◽

Sara E. M Abd AlRazak ◽

Maha M Wahdan ◽

Tamer S. F Hikal

Keyword(s):

Patient Safety ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Improve Patient Safety ◽

Cardiothoracic Surgery ◽

Patient Safety Indicators ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Safety Indicator ◽

Perioperative Hemorrhage

Abstract Background Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) were developed as a tool for hospitals to identify potentially preventable complications and improve patient safety performance. Aim the study aimed to measure the association between the AHRQ patient safety indicator PSI9 (Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma) and the clinical outcome including death, readmission within 30 days and length of stay at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital Ain Shams University. Methods exploratory prospective cohort study was conducted to follow up patients from admission till 1 month after discharge at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital who fulfills the inclusion criteria. Data were collected for 330 patients through basic information sheet and follow-up sheet. Results the incidence rate of PSI9 was 49.54 per 1000 discharges. Demographic data was not significantly associated with increased incidence of PSI9. The risk of development of PSI9 was significantly higher in patients admitted directly to ICU [relative risk (RR) =5.6]. The risk of death and readmission was higher in cases developed PSI9 than the cases without PSI9 [RR = 2.40 (0.60-9.55) and 2.43 (0.636 - 9.48) respectively]. Conclusion high incidence rate of PSI9 and the incidence is higher in male gender and 60 years old and more patients. Those patients developed PSI9 were at high risk for readmission and death. Recommendations the hospital administration should consider strategies and policies to decrease the rate of PSI9 and subsequent unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide and Rituximab Maintenance Therapy after Front-Line Induction Chemoimmunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124489 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5470-5470

Author(s):

Julie E Chang ◽

Vaishalee P. Kenkre ◽

Christopher D. Fletcher ◽

Aric C. Hall ◽

Natalie Scott Callander ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Second Malignancies ◽

Front Line ◽

First Line ◽

11Q Deletion ◽

Line Chemotherapy

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is incurable with standard therapy. With first-line chemotherapy, some patients (pts) may achieve durable remissions of many months/years. Lenalidomide (LEN) has improved progression-free survival (PFS) when given as maintenance (MNT) therapy after front-line chemotherapy (CALGB10404, CLLM1). The combination of LEN + rituximab (LR) has activity in relapsed CLL, hypothesizing benefit as MNT therapy after first-line chemotherapy. Methods: Adult pts ≥18 years with previously untreated CLL received induction bendamustine (B) 90 mg/m2 IV days 1 & 2 and rituximab (R) IV day 1 (375 mg/m2 cycle 1, then 500 mg/m2 cycles 2-6) for 6 treatment cycles (as few as 4 cycles allowed). MNT therapy with LR was initiated within 12 weeks after cycle 6, day 1 of BR. Criteria to start LR MNT included: neutrophils ≥1000/microliter (uL), platelets ≥75 K/uL, and creatinine clearance ≥40 mL/min. LEN was administered in 28-day cycles for 24 cycles, initially 5-10 mg daily continuous dosing, later modified to 5-10 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle in 6/2018 due to neutropenia and second malignancy risk. LEN was reduced to 5 mg every other day for toxicities at 5 mg/day. R 375 mg/m2 IV was given every odd cycle (total of 12 doses). Patients discontinuing LEN for any reason were allowed to continue R MNT per protocol. The primary endpoint is PFS with LR MNT therapy, calculated from the first day of MNT therapy until progressive disease (PD), death, or start of a new therapy. Secondary endpoints are response rate and overall survival. Results: Thirty-four pts have enrolled beginning 11/2013, with follow-up through 6/2019. Median age is 64 years, with 8 pts ≥70 years; 8 women and 26 men. CLL FISH panel is available on all pts: 14 with 13q (as sole abnormality), 9 with 11q deletion, 6 with trisomy 12, 4 with normal FISH panel and 1 with 17p deletion. Heavy chain mutation analysis is available on 11 pts: 8 unmutated, 2 mutated, 1 indeterminate. Thirty-one pts completed 4 (n=2) or 6 cycles of induction BR; 3 pts are receiving induction BR. Twenty-four pts have received MNT LR; 7 did not receive LR for reasons of PD during induction (n=2), infection (n=1), pt preference (n=2), renal insufficiency (n=1), and new carcinoma (n=1). MNT LR was completed in 7 pts; 9 pts are still receiving LR. Fourteen subjects have discontinued protocol therapy, 3 during induction due to PD (n=2) and infection (n=1), and 8 during MNT. Toxicities that led to discontinuation of LR were recurrent infections in 7 pts, including 2 events of PJP pneumonia; 4 pts had recurrent neutropenia with infections; 1 pt had neutropenia without infections. Response is assessable in 31 patients using the International Working Group Consensus Criteria. Best responses to treatment were: partial response 65% (22/34), complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR 24% (8/34). The median number of MNT cycles received is 16. The dose intensity of LEN across total cycles received (n=278): 5 mg every other day (52.5%), 5 mg/day (43.9%), and 10 mg/day (3.6%). The most common reason for dose reduction or dose holding was neutropenia. Most common Gr 3/4 toxicities (reported as events Gr3/Gr4) during MNT therapy were: neutropenia (20/20), leukopenia (19/4), febrile neutropenia (3/1), and infections (11/-). The majority of Gr3 infections were pneumonia/respiratory (n=5). One event of disseminated herpes zoster occurred. Second malignancies during MNT included: basal cell CA (n=1), squamous cell carcinoma (n=5), and colon cancer (n=1). No unexpected second malignancies were observed in pts receiving LR. Two-year PFS (defined from day 1 of MNT therapy) is 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1), and the median follow-up for 24 patient who started maintenance therapy is 1.79 years (95% CI 1.53-2.7). There have been no deaths. Conclusion: The combination of LR is effective in sustaining remissions after a BR induction in previously untreated CLL, but with frequent neutropenia and infections even at low doses of LEN. Most patients discontinuing MNT did so due to neutropenia and/or infections. A shorter planned interval of MNT LR (i.e., 6-12 months) may confer similar benefit to extended dosing that is more tolerable. Pts at high risk for short remissions after front-line chemotherapy (e.g., unmutated heavy chain status, 11q deletion and/or failure to achieve minimal residual disease after induction) may be the populations for which LR MNT therapy is most appropriate. Disclosures Chang: Genentech: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide administered as maintenance therapy for first treatment of CLL/SLL.

Download Full-text

Impact of Idelalisib Treatment Interruption with or without Dose Reduction on Outcomes in Relapsed / Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124541 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5468-5468

Author(s):

Shuo Ma ◽

Rebecca J Chan ◽

Lin Gu ◽

Guan Xing ◽

Nishan Rajakumaraswamy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Interruption ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA) is the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor and is approved as a monotherapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma and in combination with rituximab for R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We previously evaluated IDELA treatment interruption as a mechanism to mitigate treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and found that limited interruption with clinically appropriate re-challenging resulted in superior clinical outcomes. These findings did not comprehensively address the potential confound of interruptions inherently being associated with longer duration of therapy (DoT). Furthermore, the compound effect of IDELA dose reduction together with treatment interruption on IDELA efficacy was not assessed. Objectives: 1) To evaluate whether the benefit of IDELA interruption is retained in patients on therapy >180 days, a duration previously found to be associated with longer overall survival among patients who discontinued IDELA due to an AE; and 2) To compare clinical outcomes of patients who reduced IDELA dosing in addition to interrupting IDELA with those of patients who interrupted IDELA without additional dose reduction. Methods: Using data from Gilead-sponsored trials of patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) treated with IDELA monotherapy (N=125, Gopal et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 2014) or with R/R CLL treated with IDELA + anti-CD20 (N=110, Furman et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 2014; and N=173, Jones et al., Lancet Haematol., 2017), DoT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients on IDELA therapy >180 days with vs. without interruption and between patients who experienced Interruption and Dose Reduction (IDR) vs. patients who experienced Interruption but NoDose Reduction (INoDR) at any point during IDELA treatment. Interruption was defined as missing at least one IDELA treatment day due to an AE and dose reduction could have occurred before or after the first interruption. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. Results: Sixty-nine of 125 patients with R/R iNHL (55.2%) and 222 of 283 patients with R/R CLL (78.4%) remained on IDELA therapy >180 days with 29 (42.0%) and 103 (46.4%) of them, respectively, experiencing interruption on or after day 180 (Table 1). The proportions of patients with interruption before day 180 were similar within each of these populations. Among patients on therapy >180 days, those with treatment interruption on or after 180 days had a longer median (m) DOT than patients without interruption (Table 1). Both PFS and OS were longer in CLL patients who interrupted compared to those who did not interrupt (mPFS=28.9 mos. vs. 17.3 mos. and mOS=not reached [NR] vs. 40.4 mos. for with interruption vs. without interruption, respectively, Table 1 and Figure 1). In patients with iNHL, no difference was observed in PFS or OS between patients who interrupted vs. those who did not (Table 1). Of patients who experienced at least one AE-induced interruption at any point during IDELA therapy (n=63 iNHL and n=157 CLL), 47 iNHL patients (74.6%) and 84 CLL patients (53.5%) also had dose reduction. Two iNHL patients (1.6%) and 5 CLL patients (1.8%) had IDELA dose reduction but no interruption. Both iNHL and CLL patients with IDR experienced a similar PFS compared to patients with INoDR (mPFS=16.5 mos. vs. 14.2 mos. for iNHL and 21.8 mos. vs. 22.1 mos. for CLL with IDR vs. INoDR, respectively, Table 2). However, OS was longer in both iNHL and CLL patients with IDR compared to INoDR (mOS=61.2 mos. vs. 35.3 mos. for iNHL and NR vs. 42.4 mos. for CLL, respectively, Table 2; CLL patients shown in Figure 2). Discussion: IDELA treatment interruption is not associated with rapid clinical deterioration, as observed with some B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors. No clear relationship between IDELA DoT and frequency of interruption was observed. When normalized for DoT >180 days, IDELA treatment interruption retained its clinical benefit in the CLL population. When utilized together with IDELA interruption, dose reduction did not lead to inferior clinical outcomes but instead extended OS in both iNHL and CLL populations. Adherence to treatment interruption and dose reduction guidance as outlined in the IDELA USPI may optimize IDELA tolerability and efficacy for patients with iNHL and CLL. Disclosures Ma: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Chan:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gu:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Xing:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Rajakumaraswamy:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Beta-Blockers Improved Survival Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Evaluation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3306.3306 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3306-3306

Author(s):

Yi L. Hwa ◽

Qian Shi ◽

Shaji Kumar ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mayo Clinic ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Beta Blockers ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Cardiac Medication

Abstract Introduction: A recent study revealed an antiproliferative and apoptotic effect of propranolol on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our previous small matched case-control study showed longer survival in patients with propranolol and other beta-blockers (BB) intake than those without. This larger scale study was conducted to confirm the positive association of BB and MM survival. Methods: We identified 1971 newly diagnosed pts seen at Mayo Clinic between 1995 and 2010. Cardiac medication usage after diagnosis of MM was extracted from patient records and categorized based on BB intake. Cause of death was collected with death due to MM as the primary interest event and death due to cardiac disease or other reasons as competing risk events. The primary outcomes were MM disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to estimate the 5-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of MM death and OS rate, respectively. DSS and OS were compared by Gray's test and log-rank test, respectively. Multivarable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted cause-specific HR (HRCSadj.) and hazard ratio (HRadj.) for DSS and OS, respectively, adjusting for demographics, disease characteristics, diagnosis year, and various chemotherapies. Results: 930 (47.2%) of MM patients had no intake of any cardiac medications; 260 (13.2%) had BB only; 343 (17.4%) used both BB / non-BB cardiac medications; and 438 patients (22.2%) had non-BB cardiac drugs. Five-year CIR of MM death and OS rate were shown in table. Superior MM DSS was observed for BB only users, compared to patients without any cardiac drugs (HRCSadj., .53, 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj., .49, 95% CI, .38-.63, padj.<.0001). Patients received both BB and other cardiac drugs also showed superior MM DSS than non-cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj.., .54, 95% CI, .44-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drug users. (HRCSadj., .50, 95% CI, .40-.62, padj.<.0001). MM DSS does not differ between BB users with and without other cardiac drugs (padj.=0.90). Multivariable analysis showed the same pattern for OS. None of the MM therapies impacted the differences in DSS and OS among BB intake groups (interaction padj.>.60). Conclusion: MM patients with BB intake showed reduced risk of death due to MM and overall mortality compared to patients who used non-BB cardiac or never used cardiac drugs. The result warrants further investigation for anti-cancer effect of BB in MM. Disclosures Shi: Mayo Clinic: Employment. Kumar:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy. Gertz:NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Sustained Responses Following Ibrutinib Discontinuation after Frontline Therapy with Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143473 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 33-34

Author(s):

Paula A. Lengerke Diaz ◽

Michael Y. Choi ◽

Eider F. Moreno Cortes ◽

Jose V. Forero ◽

Juliana Velez-Lujan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Side Effects ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Combination Regimen ◽

Grade 3

Single oral targeted therapies have emerged as a standard of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, accessibility, side effects, and financial burden associated with long term administration limit their clinical use. Mainly, it is unclear in what clinical situation discontinuation of oral therapy can be recommended. The combination of type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab-Gazyva® with ibrutinib (GI) has shown a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients (pts) with CLL, including those with high-risk genomic aberrations. We conducted a phase 1b/2, single-arm, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GI as first-line treatment in 32 CLL pts. We report the outcome in pts that discontinued ibrutinib (either after 3 years of sustained complete response (CR) as stipulated in the clinical protocol, or due to other reasons). CLL pts enrolled in this protocol were ≥65 years old, or unfit/unwilling to receive chemotherapy. Pts received GI for six cycles, followed by daily single-agent ibrutinib. The protocol was designed to ensure that pts with a sustained CR after 36 months were allowed to discontinue ibrutinib. The median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73), and 6% of the evaluated pts had 17p deletion. All pts were able to complete the six planned cycles of obinutuzumab. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events (>5% CTCAE grade 3-4) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperglycemia. The rate and severity of infusion-related reactions (IRR) were much lower than expected (Grade≥ 3, 3%), and pts without IRR had lower serum levels of cytokines/chemokines CCL3 (P=0.0460), IFN-γ (P=0.0457), and TNF-α (P=0.0032) after infusion. The overall response rate was 100%, with nine pts (28%) achieving a CR, and four pts (12.5%) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the bone marrow, defined as <10-4 CLL cells on multicolor flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (IQR 24.5-42.7) after starting treatment, 91% of the enrolled pts remain in remission with a 100% overall survival. Sixteen pts have completed a long-term follow-up of 36 months. Six pts showed CR, with three of them achieving uMRD in the bone marrow. Ten of these pts were in PR, and only one had disease progression and started treatment for symptomatic stage I disease with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. In total, thirteen pts (41%) have stopped ibrutinib, with a median time on treatment prior to discontinuation of 35 months. Five (16%) of these pts had CRs and discontinued after 36 months. Eight additional pts (25%) had PRs and discontinued ibrutinib without being eligible: three pts discontinued prior to 36 months due to toxicities, and five pts discontinued after 36 months (3 due to side effects, and 2 due to financially driven decision). One patient eligible to discontinue ibrutinib, decided to remain on treatment despite sustained CR. After a median follow up time following ibrutinib discontinuation of 8 months (IQR 3.5-17), only two out of 13 pts have progressed (10 and 17 months after Ibrutinib discontinuation). None of the pts that stopped ibrutinib after achieving a CR have shown signs of disease progression. Of note, the pharmaceutical sponsor provided ibrutinib for the first 36 months, after which pts or their insurer became financially responsible. This particular scenario could bias the discontinuation pattern compared to a real world experience. It also provided us with a perspective about diverse factors affecting the treatment choices of pts. In summary, the obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib combination therapy was well-tolerated, with a much lower IRR rate. Efficacy compares favorably with historical controls with all pts responding to therapy, no deaths associated with treatment or disease progression, and a longer than expected time-to-progression after discontinuation of ibrutinib. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was higher than reported in the literature, most likely influenced by the protocol design and financial decisions driven by the switch from sponsor-provided ibrutinib to insurance or self-paid medication. Our observations regarding safety, efficacy and lack of disease progression after ibrutinib discontinuation are encouraging, and warrant confirmation in long-term prospective studies. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02315768. Funding: Pharmacyclics LLC. Disclosures Choi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Amaya-Chanaga:AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Other: Research performed while employed as an investigator of this study at UCSD.. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Castro:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Results from the Phase II GIBB Study of the Combination of Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123630 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3491-3491 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alexey Danilov ◽

Habte A Yimer ◽

Michael Boxer ◽

John M Burke ◽

Sunil Babu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Health Status ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Global Health ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Future Health ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). GIBB (NCT02320487) is an open-label, single-arm phase II study of obinutuzumab (GA101; G) in combination with bendamustine (G-Benda) in patients with previously untreated CLL. A previous report from the GIBB study demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate of 89.2%, a complete response rate of 49.0%, and no unexpected safety signals with G-Benda (Sharman et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here we report the final HRQoL data over 3 years from the GIBB study. Methods: Enrolled patients received G-Benda by intravenous infusion over six 28-day cycles: G 100mg on Day (D)1, 900mg on D2, and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of Cycle (C)1, then 1000mg on D1 of C2-6; benda 90mg/m2 on D2-3 of C1, and on D1-2 of C2-6. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) includes a global health status measure, 5 functional scales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning), 8 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and an item on financial difficulties (Aaronson et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) is a 16-item module, specific to CLL, containing 4 multi-item scales (fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and infection) and 2 single items (social activities and future health worries). Both questionnaires were completed by patients on C1D1 (baseline), C3D1, and C6D1, at the end of induction (EOI) treatment (defined as +28 days from C6D1 or early treatment termination visit), at the response visit (defined as 2-3 months after the EOI treatment for all patients who received study treatment and had not experienced disease progression), and every 3 months thereafter at follow-up visits for up to 2 years. In total, there were 14 timepoints where data were collected. HRQoL scores were linear transformed to a 0-100-point scale. Mean baseline scores and mean score changes from baseline at each visit were evaluated. A threshold of ≥10-point change in score represents a clinically meaningful difference. For symptoms, negative change scores from baseline reflect an improvement in symptom burden. For global health status and functioning, positive change scores from baseline reflect improvements. Results: The trial enrolled 102 patients. Median age was 61 years and 68.4% of patients were male. Ninety-eight patients (96%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 other questionnaire during a follow-up visit. Questionnaire completion rates at 14 time points ranged from 96% at baseline to 66% at 27 months follow-up (Table 1). According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Figure 1), improvements were observed for global health status at all follow-up visits, and clinically meaningful improvements were observed at the response visit, 3 months follow-up, and 27 months follow-up. Clinically meaningful improvements in role functioning were observed at EOI and persisted throughout the 27-month follow-up. For fatigue, clinically meaningful improvements were observed at every visit starting from the end of treatment (EOT) visit. Improvements were also observed for insomnia with mean reductions from baseline ≥10 points at various time points during follow-up. There was no worsening in other patient-reported symptoms or functional status over time. Similarly, with the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 (Figure 2), clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed for fatigue, disease symptoms, and future health worries during treatment, at the EOT and/or throughout the follow-up. The largest improvement was observed for fatigue (-24.7) at the 24-month follow-up and future health worries (-25.4) at the 27-month follow-up. Conclusions: We previously reported that G-Benda is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of CLL with no unexpected safety signals. The HRQoL data from the GIBB trial suggest that G-Benda treatment consistently improved patient HRQoL over time. Several clinically meaningful improvements were observed in HRQoL, including global health status, functioning, symptoms, and future health worries. Disclosures Danilov: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yimer:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy. Boxer:Gerson Lerman: Consultancy; Best Doctors: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Burke:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Babu:Genentech: Research Funding. Li:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Mun:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masaquel:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Sharman:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated: in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia; in combination with bendamustine followed by GAZYVA monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after, or are refractory to, a rituximab-containing regimen

Download Full-text

The Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential on Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116240 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4359-4359

Author(s):

Koji Sasaki ◽

Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽

Guillermo Montalban-Bravo ◽

Rita Assi ◽

Kiran Naqvi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Next Generation ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Genetics Research ◽

The Impact ◽

Generation Sequencing

Abstract Introduction: Clearance of detected somatic mutations at complete response by next-generation sequencing is a prognostic marker for survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the impact of allelic burden and persistence of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)-associated mutations on survival remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of allelic burden of CHIP mutations at diagnosis, and their persistence within 6 months of therapy. Methods: From February 1, 2012 to May 26, 2016, we reviewed 562 patients with newly diagnosed AML. Next-generation sequencing was performed on the bone marrow samples to detect the presence of CHIP-associated mutations defined as DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, JAK2 and TP53. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time period from the diagnosis of AML to the date of last follow-up or death. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression (MVA) were performed to identify prognostic factors for OS with p value cutoff of 0.020 for the selection of variables for MVA. Landmark analysis at 6 months was performed for the evaluation of the impact of clearance of CHIP, FLT3-ITD, FLT3D835, and NPM1 mutations. Results: We identified 378 patients (74%) with AML with CHIP mutations; 134 patients (26%) with AML without CHIP mutations. The overall median follow-up of 23 months (range, 0.1-49.0). The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range, 17-92) and 66 years (range, 20-87) in CHIP AML and non-CHIP AML, respectively (p =0.001). Of 371 patients and 127 patients evaluable for cytogenetic in CHIP AML and non-CHIP AML, 124 (33%) and 25 patients (20%) had complex karyotype, respectively (p= 0.004). Of 378 patients with CHIP AML, 183 patients (48%) had TET2 mutations; 113 (30%), TP53; 110 (29%), ASXL1; 109 (29%), DNMT3A; JAK2, 46 (12%). Of 378 patients, single CHIP mutations was observed in 225 patients (60%); double, 33 (9%); triple, 28 (7%); quadruple, 1 (0%). Concurrent FLT3-ITD mutations was detected in 47 patients (13%) and 12 patients (9%) in CHIP AML and non-CHIP AML, respectively (p= 0.287); FLT3-D835, 22 (6%) and 8 (6%), respectively (p= 0.932); NPM1 mutations, 62 (17%) and 13 (10%), respectively (p= 0.057). Of 183 patients with TET2-mutated AML, the median TET2 variant allele frequency (VAF) was 42.9% (range, 2.26-95.32); of 113 with TP53-mutated AML, the median TP53 VAF, 45.9% (range, 1.15-93.74); of 109 with ASXL1-mutated AML, the median ASXL1 VAF was 34.5% (range, 1.17-58.62); of 109 with DNMT3A-mutated AML, the median DNMT3A VAF was 41.8% (range, 1.02-91.66); of 46 with JAK2-mutated AML, the median JAK2 VAF was 54.4% (range, 1.49-98.52). Overall, the median OS was 12 months and 11 months in CHIP AML and non-CHIP AML, respectively (p= 0.564); 16 months and 5 months in TET2-mutated AML and non-TET2-mutated AML, respectively (p <0.001); 4 months and 13 months in TP53-mutated and non-TP53-mutated AML, respectively (p< 0.001); 17 months and 11 months in DNMT3A-mutated and non-DNMT3A-mutated AML, respectively (p= 0.072); 16 months and 11 months in ASXL1-mutated AML and non-ASXL1-mutated AML, respectively (p= 0.067); 11 months and 12 months in JAK2-murated and non-JAK2-mutated AML, respectively (p= 0.123). The presence and number of CHIP mutations were not a prognostic factor for OS by univariate analysis (p=0.565; hazard ratio [HR], 0.929; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.722-1.194: p= 0.408; hazard ratio, 1.058; 95% confidence interval, 0.926-1.208, respectively). MVA Cox regression identified age (p< 0.001; HR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.024-1.048), TP53 VAF (p= 0.007; HR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.002-1.016), NPM1 VAF (p=0.006; HR, 0.980; 95% CI, 0.967-0.994), and complex karyotype (p<0.001; HR, 1.869; 95% CI, 1.332-2.622) as independent prognostic factors for OS. Of 33 patients with CHIP AML who were evaluated for the clearance of VAF by next generation sequencing , landmark analysis at 6 months showed median OS of not reached and 20.3 months in patients with and without CHIP-mutation clearance, respectively (p=0.310). Conclusion: The VAF of TP53 and NPM1 mutations by next generation sequencing can further stratify patients with newly diagnosed AML. Approximately, each increment of TP53 and NPM1 VAF by 1% is independently associated with 1% higher risk of death, and 2% lower risk of death, respectively. The presence of CHIP mutations except TP53 does not affect outcome. Disclosures Sasaki: Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Short:Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Ravandi:Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kadia:BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. DiNardo:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding.

Download Full-text