Improved Outcome with ATRA-Arsenic Trioxide Compared to ATRA-Chemotherapy in Non-High Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia – Updated Results of the Italian-German APL0406 Trial on the Extended Final Series

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 12-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Giuseppe Avvisati ◽  
Gerhard Ehninger ◽  
Laura Cicconi ◽  
Christian Thiede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Label Use ◽  
Line Management

Abstract Background: We recently showed that the combination of ATRA and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior and possibly superior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in the front-line management of low/intermediate risk APL (Italian-German APL 0406 trial; Lo-Coco et al., NEJM 2013). We report herein on the extended and final series of 276 patients (162 were in the previous report) with the last case being enrolled into the study in January 2013. Methods: The APL0406 study was a prospective, open-label, randomized intergroup trial conducted by the Italian GIMEMA and the German SAL and AMLSG study groups. Eligible patients were adults aged 18-<71 years with newly diagnosed, genetically confirmed, non-high-risk (WBC≤10x109/L) APL. Patients were randomized to receive the ATO+ATRA combination originally developed by the MD Anderson Cancer Center group, or the Italian AIDA2000 protocol (Estey et al., Blood 2006 and Lo-Coco et al., Blood 2010). Patients in the ATRA-ATO arm received ATO 0.15/kg plus ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily until CR, then ATO 5 days/week, 4 weeks on 4 weeks off, for a total of 4 courses and ATRA 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off for a total of 7 courses. Patients in the ATRA-CHT arm received the standard AIDA (ATRA+Idarubicin) induction followed by 3 cycles of anthracycline-based consolidation together with ATRA and low dose CHT and ATRA for maintenance. The primary study objective was EFS at 2 years. Results: A total of 254 patients were evaluable for response to induction. CR was achieved in 122/122 (100%) in the ATRA-ATO versus 128/132 (97%) in the ATRA-CHT arm (P=0.12). Four patients died during induction in the ATRA-CHT arm. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 1-75 months), the 2-year EFS was 98% and 84.9% in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT groups respectively (P= 0.0002), The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate was 1.1% and 9.4%, respectively (P=0.005) and, finally, the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 99.1% vs. 94.4% (P=0.01) for ATRA-ATO vs ATRA-CHT, respectively. Conclusions: The data on this extended cohort demonstrate a significantly augmented survival benefit coupled to a higher antileukemic efficacy provided by ATRA-ATO as compared to ATRA-CHT, in low/intermediate risk APL. These results further support ATRA-ATO as the new standard of care in this clinical setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Platzbecker: Teva: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Presentation includes off-label use of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in front-line management of APL. ATO is currently approved in treatment of relapsed APL in the US and Europe. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Fiedler:TEVA: Travel reimbursement for meeting attendance Other. Lübbert:Cephalon / TEVA: Travel support Other. Link:TEVA: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radsak:Celgene: Research Funding. Döhner:TEVA: Research Funding. Schlenk:TEVA: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lo-Coco:TEVA: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria.

ATRA and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) Versus ATRA and Idarubicin (AIDA) for Newly Diagnosed, Non High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL): Results of the Phase III, Prospective, Randomized, Intergroup APL0406 Study by the Italian-German Cooperative Groups Gimema-SAL-AMLSG

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Lo-Coco ◽  
Giuseppe Avvisati ◽  
Sonia Maria Orlando ◽  
Felicetto Ferrara ◽  
Marco Vignetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Similar Frequency ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Us

Abstract Abstract 6 Background Simultaneous ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) is the current gold standard for newly diagnosed APL resulting in ∼80% cure rates, while arsenic trioxide (ATO) is the treatment of choice for relapsed patients. ATO in variable combinations including ± ATRA ± CHT has also been tested as front-line therapy yielding encouraging results in several pilot studies as well as in two phase III studies conducted in China and the US. So far, no randomised studies have compared front-line CHT-free ATO+ATRA combination against the standard ATRA+CHT approach. Patients and Methods The phase III, randomised, prospective APL0406 trial was started in October 2007 by the Italian GIMEMA group and joined in November 2008 by the German SAL and AMLSG multicenter groups. Eligible patients were adults aged 18-<71 years with newly diagnosed, genetically confirmed, non-high-risk (WBC≤10×109/L) APL. Patients were randomized to receive the ATO+ATRA combination originally reported by the MD Anderson group (Estey et al. Blood 2006, arm A), or the Italian AIDA2000 risk-adapted protocol for non high-risk disease (arm B). Patients in arm A received ATO 0.15/kg plus ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily until CR, then ATO 5 days/week, 4 weeks on 4 weeks off, for a total of 4 courses and ATRA 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off for a total of 7 courses. Patients in arm B received the standard AIDA (ATRA+Idarubicin) induction followed by 3 cycles of anthracycline-based plus ATRA consolidation and low dose CHT and ATRA for maintenance as reported (Lo-Coco et al., Blood 2011). The primary study objective was EFS at 2 years. The study was designed to show that the rate of patients alive event-free at two years in the experimental treatment arm is at least 80%. Secondary objectives included OS, DFS, CIR rates, molecular response and toxicity profile. Results From October 2007 to September 2010, the required sample size of 162 enrolled patients was completed. Median age was 45.3 years (18.7–70.2 years) and median WBC 1.50 × 109/L. As to the Sanz's risk score, 61.8% and 38.2% of patients were in the intermediate- and low-risk categories, respectively. The two treatment arms were well balanced for main baseline characteristics including age, sex, median WBC and Sanz's score. Eight patients were not evaluable for induction due to ineligibility or protocol violation. Of 154 patients evaluable for response to induction, CR was achieved in 150 (97.4%): 75/75 (100%) in arm A vs 75/79 (95%) in arm B (P=0.12). After a median follow-up of 31 months (range 0.07–50.4) the 2 year EFS (primary objective) was 97% (C.I.95%: 93.1–100) and 86.7% (C.I.95%: 80.3–93.6) in arms A and B respectively (P=0.03). There were 1 death in CR and 2 relapses in arm A, and 7 deaths (4 in induction, 3 in CR) and 4 relapses in arm B. As to secondary objectives, OS, DFS, and CIR rates were 98.7% vs. 91.1% (P=0.03), 97% vs. 91.6% (P=0.19) and 1.6% vs. 4.3% (P=0.41) in arm A and B, respectively. Fever episodes, prolonged (>15 d) grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly more frequent in patients in arm B as compared to those in arm A (P <.001 for all comparisons). Other side effects including differentiation syndrome and increase of liver enzymes were recorded with similar frequency in the two study arms. Two patients in arm A had QTc prolongation requiring ATO discontinuation with final withdrawal in one case. PCR analysis of PML/RARA (sensitivity 10−4) was centrally performed in Rome (F. Lo-Coco) and Dresden (C. Thiede) and showed molecular CR in 141/142 (99%) of evaluable patients after completion of 3rd consolidation. One patient in arm B who tested PCR-positive at this time point was considered resistant and taken off protocol as per study design. Conclusions For patients with newly diagnosed non-high-risk APL, as compared to the standard AIDA regimen, the front-line CHT-free ATO+ATRA combination is at least not inferior for 2 year EFS. Disclosures: Lo-Coco: Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) is currently approved for therapy of relapsed APL in the US and Europe. In this study the role of ATO in front-line therapy of APL is explored. Fiedler:Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Platzbecker:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Phase II Study of All-Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA), Arsenic Trioxide (ATO), with or without Gemtuzumab OzogamIcin (GO) for the Frontline Therapy of Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1080-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Elihu H. Estey ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Sherry A. Pierce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Off Label ◽  
All Trans Retinoic Acid ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Abstract 1080 Background: The role of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in the frontline treatment of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) remains unclear with a number of studies reporting high and durable responses with single agent ATO. We have conducted a trial combining all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) with ATO with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in patients with previously untreated APL. Patients and methods: From July 2002 to June 2010, 104 patients with newly diagnosed APL were treated with a combination of ATRA plus ATO in two studies. The first cohort of 47 patients received ATRA (45 mg/m2 daily) and ATO (0.15 mg/kg daily beginning on day 10 of ATRA). High-risk patients (White blood cell count [WBC] > 10 × 109/L) received GO 9 mg/m2 on the first day of induction. From July 2007, the second cohort of 57 patients received ATRA (45 mg/m2 daily) and ATO (0.15 mg/kg daily) concomitantly on day one of induction. They also received GO 9 mg/m2 on day 1, if high risk, and any time during induction if the WBC rose to > 30 × 109/L (and more recently if > 10 × 109/L). Monitoring for PML-RARA fusion gene using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was conducted after induction and throughout consolidation and follow up. The median age for the 104 patients was 46 years (range, 14–81). Their median presenting WBC was 2.7 × 109/L (0.4-131.4 × 109/L) and their median platelet count was 36 × 109/L (range, 7–261 × 109/L). Seventy three (70%) had low risk and 31 (30%) high risk disease (based only on the presentation WBC ≤ or > 10.0 × 109/L). Results: Overall, 102 patients (98%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 2 died during induction. With a median follow-up of 115 weeks (range, 4 to 397 weeks), 94 patients remain alive. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 88% and event-free survival 86%; only 5 of the patients achieving a CR (5%) have relapsed. The median overall survival, remission duration and event-free survival have not been reached (Figure). Thirty six patients have been alive and in remission for more than 3 years and 21 for more than 5 years. Two late deaths (beyond 300 weeks) occurred in CR from unrelated causes. Conclusion: The combination of ATRA and ATO (with or without GO) as initial therapy for APL is highly effective and safe; it can potentially substitute for chemotherapy containing regimens in high and low risk patients. Disclosures: Ravandi: Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Off-label use of arsenic trioxide in frontline therapy of APL; off label use of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in APL. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Immunomodulation of Both Donors and Recipients with Atorvastatin As a Strategy for the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (aGVHD): Results of Two Parallel Prospective Trials in Recipients of Matched Sibling Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1942-1942
Author(s):  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Michael Craig ◽  
Scot Remick ◽  
Laura Gibson ◽  
William Petros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Abstract 1942 Introduction: Acute GVHD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following alloHCT. Atorvastatin (a statin drug) is a potent immunomodulatory agent capable of suppressing T cell–dependent immune responses that holds promise as a novel and safe agent for the prophylaxis of aGVHD. In murine models atorvastatin administration to both donor and recipient mice (compared to prophylaxis in either donors or recipients alone), prevented aGVHD by inhibiting donor T-cell proliferation, inducing T-helper 2 polarization, and by inhibiting recipient antigen presenting cell function (Zeiser et al. Blood, 2007). Several retrospective studies also suggest statins as potential prophylactic agents for aGVHD. Methods: We report here the results of two parallel, ongoing, prospective, phase II trials (NCT01175148 & NCT01491958) evaluating the safety and efficacy of a ‘two-pronged’ strategy of atorvastatin administration as aGVHD prophylaxis, to both adult (age ≥18yrs) donors and recipients of matched sibling alloHCT. The approach was identical in both protocols. Subjects with a history of atorvastatin allergy/intolerance were not eligible. As GVHD prophylaxis, atorvastatin at 40mg/day orally was administered to sibling donors, starting 14–28 days before the anticipated 1st day of stem cell collection. In alloHCT recipients GVHD prophylaxis consisted of atorvastatin (40mg/day) administered from day -14 to day +180 (or until stopping immunosuppression, toxicity, development of grade [Gr] II-IV aGVHD, or severe chronic GVHD [cGVHD]). In addition all recipients received standard GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate. Ex vivo CD34+ cell selection or in vivo T-cell depletion was not permitted. Primary outcomes were rate of Gr II-IV aGVHD at day +100 and safety of atorvastatin administration to alloHCT donor/recipient pairs. Both trials tested the null hypothesis H0: p≥35%, vs. the alternate H1: p≤15%, where p is probability of Gr II-IV aGVHD at day 100. Secondary outcomes included rates of late-onset aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between September 2010 and June 2012, 34 donor/recipient pairs were enrolled at WVU (n=24) and OSU (n=10). Median donor age was 50.5 yrs (range 24–69). Median duration of atorvastatin prophylaxis in donors was 15 days (range 7–26). No atorvastatin related Gr 3–4 toxicities were seen in the healthy donors. Table 1 shows baseline patient (pt) characteristics. At transplantation 16 pts (47%) had high-risk disease, 12 (35%) were chemorefractory, 11 (32%) had HCT-CI of ≥3, 14 (41%) were female to male allografts, and 12 (35%) pts had ABO mismatched transplants. Median follow up of survivors is 158 days (range 31 – 658). Atorvastatin was well tolerated with no Gr 2–4 adverse events. All pts engrafted. The median time to ANC ≥500/μL was 18 days (range 5–25) and to platelets ≥20k/μL was 15 days (range 11–51). The median day 100 chimerism was 85.5% (55–100%) for T-cells and 100% (26–100%) for myeloid cells. Respective numbers at day 180 are 99.5% and 100%. Among 34 evaluable pts, the cumulative incidences (CI) of Gr II-IV and Gr III–IV aGVHD at day 100 were 6.0 ± 4.2% and 0% respectively. Respective CI rates at day 180 are 16.7 ± 8.3% and 10.2 ± 7%. CI of mild/moderate and severe cGVHD at 1 year are 15.8 ± 8.9% and 18.3 ± 10.2%, respectively. Infectious complications were infrequent, with no fungal infections or EBV reactivations and few CMV reactivations (n=3). Non-relapse mortality was 0% at day 100 and 4.5% at day 180. CI of relapse at day 180 was 27.6 ± 9.2%. One year PFS and OS estimates are 54% and 66%, respectively. Conclusions: A two-pronged immunomodulatory strategy of atorvastatin administration to alloHCT donors/recipients appears to be a feasible, safe and potentially effective modality for aGVHD prophylaxis. Final results of NCT01175148 & updated results of NCT01491958 will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Hamadani: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; American Cancer Society 116837-IRG-09-061-01: Research Funding; ASBMT & Millennium New Investigator Award: Research Funding; Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Off Label use of atorvastatin for GVHD prophylaxis. Efebera:(NIA) K12 CA1333250: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding.

Safety of Clofarabine with Multiagent Chemotherapy in Childhood High Risk Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Vandevol study of the French SFCE Acute Leukemia Committee).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2570-2570
Author(s):  
Brigitte Nelken ◽  
Guy Leverger ◽  
Claire Galambrun ◽  
Genevieve Plat ◽  
Claudine Schmitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Abstract 2570 Background. Current outcome of very early relapse of ALL in children remains poor. Clofarabine, a novel nucleoside analog has proven effective as a single agent in childhood ALL second relapse, providing a CR+CRp ratio of 20 to 28 % (Jeha 2006, Kearns 2006). Clofarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide and Etoposide provided a 44% overal response rate rate in children with advanced ALL (Hijiya 2011) and further multi-drug combinations need to be investigated. The VANDA regimen that has proven effective in high risk ALL and in ALL relapse (Domenech 2008) was used as a template, Cytarabine being replaced by Clofarabine in this combination. Procedure. A phase I study combining escalating doses of Clofarabine with fixed doses of Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Asparaginase and Dexamethasone was undertaken in children presenting very early (18 months or less after initial diagnosis) medullary or combined ALL relapse or children with second relapse or post transplant relapse. A 3+3 rolling design was used for escalating clofarabine doses with 25% increments from 20 to 40mg/m2/d. Results. Sixteen patients were enrolled, eleven in first marrow relapse, four in second relapse. One patient with an initially refractory disease was secondary excluded as he didn't fulfill the inclusion criteria. Four patients had previously been allografted. Three patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (clofarabine 20 mg/m2), and 3 patients at dose level 2 (clofarabine 26 mg/m2) without any significant dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Six patients were enrolled at dose level 3 (clofarabine 32 mg/m2), one patient experienced a liver DLT (gamma GT elevation) exceeding 7 days. At the last planned dose level (clofarabine 40 mg/m2), two patients had a grade 3 transaminase elevation exceeding 7 days and 2 patients had a severe fungal infection. Median duration of neutropenia was 20 days (15–31). Other expected toxicities included 3 documented bacterial infections, 3 mucosal toxicities needing parenteral support, one lung aspergillosis, one transient insulin dependant hyperglycemia. There was no toxic death. Out of 15 evaluable patients, 11 (73%) achieved a complete cytological remission (CR). 4 relapses occurred at 1, 1, 2 and 3 months. 6 patients proceeded to allo-SCT with 2 second allografts. One allografted patient died from EBV-PTLD, the others are alive at 2, 13, 13, 15, and 29 months post-transplant. Conclusion. Clofarabine in combination with four major antileukemic drugs appeared feasible and effective in inducing complete remission in those high risk patients. Clofarabine MTD was 32 mg/m2/d for five days and this dose step is currently being expanded to a total of 10 patients, before a phase II study will be proposed for early and very early ALL relapses. Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01279096). Disclosures: Off Label Use: off label use of clofarabine.

Low Dose Azacitidine (AZA) Reduces the Incidence of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 742-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos de Lima ◽  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
Julianne J Chen ◽  
Sergio A Giralt ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Landmark Analysis ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Abstract 742 AZA has immunomodulatory properties that may affect donor lymphocytes favorably, potentially leading to less GVHD after HSCT. We have been investigating low-dose AZA (32 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) to prevent AML/MDS relapse after HSCT. Interestingly, in our dose finding phase I study (Cancer, 2010) there was a suggestion of less cGVHD with longer AZA treatments. We then hypothesized that this approach leads to less cGVHD, and performed a comparison of patients that received AZA to prevent relapse versus historic controls that did not receive the drug. Major objective of this analysis is to determine the cumulative incidence of cGVHD with versus without AZA. Methods. Patients received AZA based on high risk of relapse disease, starting at a median of 45 days from transplant (range, 17–149). AZA effect on aGVHD was not studied since the drug was started after most cases of aGVHD had already occurred or/and had resolved or improved. Patients with active acute GVHD (aGVHD) were not eligible to receive AZA. Median dose was 32 mg/m2 (range, 8–40). Median number of AZA cycles was 3 (range, 1–54), and median time on AZA for patients that received >3 cycles (n=37) was 144 days (range, 93–1329). Using a computer algorithm, we randomly selected from our departmental database a control group consisting of patients who had received HSCT within the same time period, and had similar GVHD prophylaxis, stem cell source, and comparable low risk of grade II-IV aGVHD (Table). Two hundred and thirty patients were identified fulfilling these criteria. The rate of cGVHD was compared between the AZA group (grouped as 1–3 cycles and >3 cycles) and the control group, in a landmark analysis starting at 6 months after HSCT. Leukemia relapse or death in remission before cGVHD onset were considered as competing risks in this analysis. Results. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 1–99) in the AZA group, and 31 months (range, 1.5–117) in the control group. 29, 24, and 115 patients in the >3 AZA cycles, 1–3 AZA cycles, and the control group were evaluable for the 6-month landmark analysis, respectively. The numbers of patients developing cGVHD and the HR at 2 years in this analysis were as follows: 53 of 115 controls (reference group), 11 of 24 patients who received 1–3 AZA cycles (HR at 2 years, 0.9; P=NS), and 6 of 29 patients who received >3 AZA cycles (HR at 2 years, 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–0.8; P=0.02) developed cGVHD. Similarly, in a landmark analysis, the cumulative incidence of cGVHD was significantly lower in the subgroup that received >3 AZA cycles (figure). Conclusion. Low-dose AZA appears to reduce the likelihood of developing cGVHD. We are investigating if this effect is associated with preservation or improvement of the graft-versus-leukemia effect in an ongoing, randomized study. Disclosures: de Lima: Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: azacitidine: off-label use as maintenance therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplant for MDS/AML. garcia Manero:celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Trial of Pentostatin, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab with or without Concurrent Avastin for Previously Untreated B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4673-4673
Author(s):  
Tait D. Shanafelt ◽  
Betsy R. LaPlant ◽  
Timothy G Call ◽  
Daniel Nikcevich ◽  
Jose F. Leis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Label Use

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40-50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays. Interactions with nurturing environments can enhance CLL B-cell resistance to apoptosis. These interactions include cytokine mediated prosurvival signals by angiogenic molecules, such as VEGF and bFGF that nurture CLL B-cells in an autocrine fashion and promote CLL cell survival partly through up regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. These findings provide a strong rationale for testing anti-VEGF therapy in combination with a purine nucleoside analogue CIT regimen for upfront treatment. We conducted a randomized phase 2 CIT trial using pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab with (PCR-B) or without (PCR) bevacizumab (B), an anti-VEGF monoclonal anti-body. METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment by NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Patients were randomized using a dynamic allocation procedure stratifying for stage (0-II vs. III-IV) and FISH (17p or 11q deletion vs. other) to receive either 6 cycles of rituximab (100 mg on day 1 of cycle 1; 375 mg/m2on day 2 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6) followed by pentostatin (2 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) (PCR) administered every 21 days. Patients in the PCR-B cohort also received bevacizumab 15mg/kg on day 1 of cycles 1-5 and days 1, 22, & 43 of cycle 6. All patients underwent complete response evaluation 3 months after day 1 of cycle 6 (or last cycle of treatment for those completing < 6 cycles). MRD was assessed using 6-color flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956) at the completion of treatment. RESULTS: 68 patients were enrolled through the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium between 1/2009 and 1/2013. Three patients were excluded from analysis: 1 patient canceled prior to treatment, 1 was dosed incorrectly, and 1 was ineligible due to immunophenotyping inconsistent with CLL. Median age of eligible patients was 63 years (range 43-81) and 43 (66%) were men. With respect to disease stage, 3 (5%), 38 (58%), and 24 (37%) had low, intermediate and high Rai stage disease. Eleven (17%) patients had deletion 17p or 11q & 29 (45%) had unmutated IGHV. No statistically significant differences were observed in these variables by treatment arm. All 65 evaluable patients have completed active treatment, with 54 (83.1%) completing the intended 6 cycles (PCR group 27/32 [84.4%] and PCR-B 27/33 [81.8%]). Hematologic grade 3+ adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 10 (31.3%) patients on PCR and 12 (36.4%) on PCR-B (p=0.79). Non-hematologic grade 3+ adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 9 (28.1%) patients on PCR and 18 (54.4%) on PCR-B (p=0.04). The most common such events were hypertension (PCR: 3.1% vs. PCR-B: 21.2%), proteinuria (0% vs. 6.1%) and creatinine increase (3.1% vs. 6.1%). Across both arms, 64/65 (98.5%) patients achieved a response including 31/32 (96.9%) treated with PCR and 33/33 (100%) treated with PCR-B (p=0.49). CR/CRi was achieved in 10/32 (31.3%) patients treated with PCR & 18/33 (54.5%) treated with PCR-B (p=0.08). Of the 28 who achieved a CR/CRi, MRD analysis was completed on 26, of whom 12 (46%) were MRD negative. With respect to treatment arm, 5/32 (16%) patients on PCR and 7/33 (21%) on PCR-B achieved an MRD negative CR. Median time to retreatment for all 65 patients was 44.8 (95% CI: 34.6 – NA) months. Median overall survival has not yet been reached. With current follow-up no differences between treatment-free survival (p=0.38), progression-free survival (p=0.23), or overall survival (p=0.45) are observed by treatment arm. Plasma levels of angiogenic cytokines VEGF, bFGF, thrombospondin (TSP) and the chemokines CCL3 and CCL4 were measured prior to treatment and at the time of the post treatment response evaluation. Correlations of these cytokines with clinical outcome will be presented. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to purine analogue-based CIT was generally well-tolerated and may increase complete remission rates in patients with CLL. No clear improvement in treatment free survival has been observed to date. Disclosures Shanafelt: Hospiria: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Jannsen: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; glaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Off label use of pentostatin for treatment of CLL. Off label use of bevacizumab for treatment of CLL. . Kay:Genetech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Prognostic Impact of CD20 and CD25 Expression in Patients with Philadelphia-Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 984-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio P.S. Santos ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Cd25 Expression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Abstract 984 Poster Board I-6 Background: The Ph chromosome is the most common cytogenetic abnormality in adult patients with ALL and is associated with a higher risk of relapse and death. With the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI; imatinib, dasatinib), the treatment of patients with Ph+ ALL has evolved. Regimens combining conventional chemotherapy with TKI have lead to significant improvements in the outcome of these patients. However, there is still a high incidence of relapse, and the determination of prognostic factors in these patients might lead to the development of risk-adapted therapy. CD20 is a cell surface marker expressed in 40% of adult patients with ALL, and it is associated with worse survival (Thomas D et al, Blood 2009; 113: 6330-6337). CD25 is the a-chain of the IL-2 receptor and has been reported to be associated with adverse outcomes in Ph+ ALL (Paietta E et al, Blood 2008; 112:Abstract 1500). Aims: To determine the prognostic impact of CD20 and CD25 expression in patients with Ph+ ALL. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with Ph+ ALL treated at our institution with conventional chemotherapeutic protocols (Hyper-CVAD) alone or combined with TKI (Hyper-CVAD + imatinib and Hyper-CVAD + dasatinib). None of the patients received therapy with Rituximab. CD20 and CD25 expression were assessed by flow cytometry, and the cut-off for positivity was 20%. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: We analyzed 126 patients with Ph+-ALL treated at our institution from November, 1992, until February, 2009. Patients received Hyper-CVAD alone (N=44), Hyper-CVAD + Imatinib (N=47) and Hyper-CVAD + Dasatinib (N=35). Median age of the whole cohort was 49 years (range 16-84). CD20 was positive in 69 of 124 (57%) evaluable patients. CD25 was positive in 63 of 112 (56%) evaluable patients. Patients that were CD20-positive had a higher incidence of peripheral lymphadenopathy (21% vs. 7%, p=0.04). Patients that were CD25-positive had lower lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (median 1006 IU/L vs. 1433 IU/L; p=0.01), lower percentage of bone marrow blasts (median 86% vs. 90%, p=0.02), higher platelet counts (median 50×109/L vs. 32×109/L, p=0.01) and a higher incidence of CNS disease at diagnosis (21% vs. 4%, p=0.01). The complete response rate of the whole cohort was 91%. There was no impact of CD20 or CD25 positivity on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with Hyper-CVAD alone. In patients treated with Hyper-CVAD + dasatinib, CD20 positivity was associated with improved DFS (Figure 1) (median – not reached [NR] vs. 48 weeks [wks], p=0.01) and OS (median NR vs. 65 wks, p=0.06). Patients treated with Hyper-CVAD + imatinib who were CD20-positive had better DFS (median 91 vs. 57 wks, p=0.77) and OS (median 118 vs. 73 wks, p=0.98), but this did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend for worse survival in patients treated with Hyper-CVAD + dasatinib that were CD25 positive, but without a statistically significant difference (median DFS 55 wks vs. NR, p=0.10; median OS 85 wks vs. NR, p=0.11). We repeated the analysis combining Hyper-CVAD + dasatinib and Hyper-CVAD + imatinib (Hyper-CVAD + TKI). There was no significant difference in DFS and OS by CD20 expression (median DFS 130 wks vs. 53 wks, p=0.11; median OS 124 wks vs. 74 wks, p=0.11) or CD25 expression (median DFS 63 wks vs. 86 wks, p=0.33; median OS 100 wks vs. 117 wks, p=0.39). Conclusion: In patients with Ph+-ALL treated with regimens combining conventional chemotherapy and TKI, expression of CD20 may be associated with better survival outcomes. CD25 did not influence survival in our patients. More studies are needed to better determine the prognostic value of these markers and implement risk-adapted strategies treatment. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off label use of imatinib and dasatinib in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Cortes:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Subcutaneous Alemtuzumab Combined with Oral Dexamethasone, Followed by Alemtuzumab Maintenance or Allo-SCT In CLL with 17p- or Refractory to Fludarabine – Interim Analysis of the CLL2O Trial of the GCLLSG and FCGCLL/MW

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 920-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
Florence Cymbalista ◽  
Véronique Leblond ◽  
Alain Delmer ◽  
Thorsten Zenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Oral Dexamethasone ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Abstract 920 CLL refractory to purine analogues (e.g. fludarabine, F) or with 17p- is associated with very poor prognosis. Alemtuzumab is active in F-refractory CLL, and has proven efficacy in patients (pts) with 17p-. However, outcome of F-refractory CLL is still poor in terms of remission rate and duration of remission. The multinational, multicenter CLL2O trial aims at achieving a higher remission rate by adding high-dose dexamethasone to alemtuzumab, and prolongation of remission duration and survival by alemtuzumab maintenance or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Pts with CLL refractory (no PR/CR or PR/CR < 6 months) to F-based (e.g. FR, FC, FCR) or similar chemotherapy (i.e. pentostatin, cladribine, bendamustine), or exhibiting 17p- (untreated or at relapse) were eligible if they had “active disease”. Treatment was with subcutaneous alemtuzumab 30 mg weekly × 3 for 28 days, combined with oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 15–18, and prophylactic pegfilgrastim 6 mg days 1 and 15. Depending on the remission status, pts were treated for up to 12 weeks. If CR was documented at 4 or 8 weeks, or at least SD was achieved at 12 weeks, consolidation was scheduled with either allo-SCT or alemtuzumab maintenance with 30mg weekly every 14 days for up to 2 years (yrs). Decision for one of the two consolidation options was at discretion of patient and physician. From January 2008 to July 2010, 80 pts were enrolled at 22 centers and 79 were eligible; F-refractory (n=31), 17p- without prior therapy (n=31), and 17p- in relapse (n=17). Median age was 65 yrs in the F-refractory (range 38–76) and 17p- 1st-line group (36-76), and 60 yrs for the 17p- relapse group (54-73) with male predominance (F-refractory 74%, 17p- 1st-line 71%, 17p- relapse 82%). In the 17p- 1st-line and relapse groups, 52% and 50% were stage Binet C and exhibit reduced performance status (ECOG 1–2), compared to 81% Binet C and 60% ECOG 1–2 for the F-refractory cohort. Pretreated pts had received a median of 2 prior lines (F-refractory 1–6; 17p- relapse 1–5), and 5 pts had received prior SCT. In the F-refractory group, 16% of pts had 11q- and 52% had 17p-. IGHV was unmutated in 64% of 17p- groups and 72% in the F-refractory group. The median levels of ß2-MG / TK were 4.35 / 35.40 in the 17p- groups and 4.12 / 22.65 in the F-refractory group. Treatment data are currently available for 50 pts who completed induction therapy; F-refractory (n=19),17p- 1st-line (n=22), 17p- relapse (n=9). Full treatment duration (12 weeks) could be achieved in 47% F-refractory, 67% 17p- relapsed and 82% 17p- 1st-line pts. In the latter cohort, early stop of therapy was mainly correlated with CR, while in the F-refractory cohort with disease progression (n=2) and infections (n=5, 4 with no documented response). Response rates (ORR / CR) were 47% / 0% in the F-refractory cohort, 78% / 0% in the 17p- relapsed, and 100% / 23% in the 17p- 1st-line cohorts (as compared to this, ORR / CR was 71.4% / 4.8% with FCR in the 17p- 1st-line group of CLL8). Adverse events during treatment were mostly grade 1/2 apart from hematotoxicity. Grade 3/4 non-CMV infection occurred in 35% of F-refractory, 12% of 17p- relapsed, and 16% of 17p- 1st-line pts. CMV reactivation was observed in 32 % of the 17p- 1st-line pts, and less for the pretreated groups (F-refractory 16%, 17p- relapsed 18%). All CMV episodes were successfully treated, and there was no CMV-related death. Among 18 pts documented to receive alemtuzumab maintenance treatment, so far 3 SAEs have been reported: ITP (n=1, twice in the same pt), and fever / diarrhea / thyroiditis (n=1). At a median follow-up of 41.9 weeks (maintenance 54.7 weeks, allo-SCT 29 weeks), there were 7 (37%) deaths in the in the F-refractory cohort, 2 due to disease progression, and 5 due to infection. For the 17p- relapsed group, 3 progressions and 3 deaths were reported, with one case in each treatment option (SCT/maintenance), and one pt in salvage therapy. In the 17p- 1st-line cohort, 4 progressions occurred, 2 pts died, both in maintenance therapy. At 12 months, estimated overall survival was 54%, 66% and 100% in the F-refractory, 17p- relapse, and 17p- 1st-line cohorts, respectively. Accrual is currently ongoing with a target enrolment of 122 pts and updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Stilgenbauer: Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: off-label use of diagnostic tests and therapeutic agents. Leblond:ROCHE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MUNDIPHARMA : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zenz:Roche: Honoraria; Boehringer: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Choquet:ROCHE : Consultancy. Hallek:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:Pfizer: Research Funding.

Treatment of Myelofibrosis Using I.V. Treosulfan and Autologous Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation Is Feasible and Results in Hematologic Responses – Long-Term Follow-up and Final Analysis of a One-Armed Clinical Study and of Individual Cases

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4514-4514
Author(s):  
Eike C. Buss ◽  
Julian Topaly ◽  
Hans H. Kreipe ◽  
Stefan Fruehauf ◽  
Anthony D. Ho
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
The Other ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Off Label

Abstract Abstract 4514 Introduction: Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder. The only curative therapy to date is myeloablation followed by allogeneic transplantation. Autologous transplantation after myeloablation with high-dose oral busulfan provides a palliative approach which might lead to a long-term relief of symptoms of the disease and is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality (Anderson et al., Blood, 2001; 98:586–593). However, busulfan pharmacokinetics after oral administration can vary among patients. On the other hand treosulfan, a bi-functional alkylating drug, can be administered safely i.v. with reliable pharmacokinetics and might be suitable for conditioning of patients with myelofibrosis. Methods and Results: In a pilot phase, we treated three patients on an individual basis with an autologous transplantation after myeloablation with treosulfan. Following the encouraging results we initiated a clinical trial. Included were patients with myelofibrosis and a high risk disease according to the 1997 criteria of Cervantes. The study is registered at www.kompetenznetz-leukaemie.de. As of today we have transplanted 11 patients according to the protocol, 9 in Heidelberg, 1 at the Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg and 1 at the University Hospital Rostock. Age at transplantation ranged from 50 to 69 years. For 10 of 11 patients we have been successful in collecting more than 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight (one patient with 4,9 ×106) after mobilization with G-CSF at 16 μg/kg BW s.c. daily for 4 days. The conditioning regimen was treosulfan for three days (total dose 42 g/m2). Hematologic reconstitution was considerably protracted with a median of 26 days (leucocyte count > 1/nl) compared to autologous transplantation for other indications. One patient died on day 34 post transplantation after cerebral hemorrhage. He suffered from severe transfusion refractory thrombocytopenia already before the transplantation. The twelve-month follow-up showed symptomatic relief, mostly as freedom from transfusions in 7 of 11 patients. The two survivors are alive after 9 years, one with allogeneic transplantation 2 years and the other with allogeneic transplantation 8 years after autologous transplantation. The median survival of the other 9 patients was 3.5 years after autologous transplantation (0.1 – 7.5 years). Conclusions: We conclude that myeloablation with treosulfan and autologous PBPCT for patients with myelofibrosis can provide significant palliation. It is associated with an acceptable morbidity and mortality, taking into account the high-risk nature of the disease. The approach is feasible for high-risk patients that cannot or chose not to undergo allogeneic transplantation. Disclosures: Buss: medac GmbH: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Treosulfan, off-label use as an agent for high-dose chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation. Topaly:medac GmbH: Research Funding. Fruehauf:medac GmbH: Research Funding.

Clapd (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Overcomes Negative Prognostic Impact of Adverse Cytogenetics and Prior Resistance to Lenalidomide and Bortezomib

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4232-4232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Angelique Boyer ◽  
Sujitha Yadlapati ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Sampling Error ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Label Use

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide is a distinct IMiD¨ immunomodulatory agent with activity in subjects with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM), including those with prior lenalidomide (LEN) treatment. We have previously reported that the addition of clarithromycin enhances the anti-myeloma activity of pomalidomide+dexamethasone (Pom/Dex) in the treatment of RRMM (Mark et al, ASH 2012). We now report on the clinical benefit of ClaPd with regard to the presence of the negative prognostic features of adverse cytogenetics and prior resistance to novel agents. Methods: One hundred twenty patients (pts) with heavily pretreated RRMM were enrolled into a single-institution study to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of ClaPd. Eligible subjects had at least 3 prior lines of therapy, one line of which must have included LEN. ClaPd is clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, pomalidomide 4mg for days 1-21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15,22 of a 28-day cycle. All subjects had thromboprophylaxis with 81 mg aspirin daily. Disease response evaluation was performed monthly with serum and urine protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain analysis; bone marrow biopsy with skeletal imaging was used to confirm MM progression or complete response (CR). Cytogenetic testing was performed on CD138-selected cells. Treatment was continued as tolerated by the patient until disease progression. Results: One hundred seventeen pts had completed at least 1 cycle of ClaPd and were eligible for disease response analysis at data cut-off. All pts were included in the survival analysis. Median time on study was 7.2 months (range 0.3-55.8). Patients had undergone a median of 5 (range 3-15) prior lines of therapy. High risk cytogenetics were present in 72 patients (64%, n =113) as per IMWG definition. The proportion of patients who were refractory to LEN, refractory to bortezomib (BORT), and double (LEN+BORT) refractory were 84%, 78%, and 68%, respectively. The median number of ClaPd cycles was 8 (range 1-56). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response for the entire cohort was 7.7 and 9.3 months. Overall response rate for the overall, LEN-refractory, BORT-refractory, and double-refractory cohorts did not differ significantly, Table 1. Median PFS for high vs low-risk cytogenetic groups did not differ significantly: 7.7 vs 8.3 months (P = 0.5038); however, subjects with del17p (n=27) had significantly shorter PFS at 3.73 vs 8.67 months (P = 0.0036). The presence of t(4;14) (n= 11), t(14;16) (n = 7), gain 1q (n = 46) in the absence of concurrent del 17p had no significant impact on PFS. Median PFS was not affected by LEN-refractory, BORT-refractory, or double-refractory MM status at 7.7 (P = .5193), 6.5 (P = 0.2618), and 5.8 months (P = 0.2163) respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for the group was 19.3 months (CI 14.2, 26.7). Loss of 17p was associated with significantly shorter survival at 13.2 vs 25 months (P = .0008). Other adverse cytogenetic factors did not affect OS. Median OS was not affected by LEN-refractory, BORT-refractory, or double-refractory MM status at 19.2 (P = .9355), 16.8 (P = 0.5983), and 16.8 months (P = 0.3893) respectively. Conclusions: ClaPd is a highly effective and tolerable regimen for heavily treated RRMM that has progressed after prior treatments. Response rates are higher and survival outcomes are longer than expected from prior reports of Pom/Dex activity in similar populations. The presence of double refractory disease did not significantly impact clinical outcomes. Known adverse cytogenetic factors did not affect observed PFS and OS with the exception of del 17p leading to approximately 50% decrease in PFS and OS. This 17p OS result is consistent with previously reported data by Leleu (2015, OS = 12 months); however for ClaPD, t(4;14) had no impact while Leleu 2015 reported decrease in OS to 9.2 months with Pom/Dex. This finding may be due to sampling error due to the relatively low % of pts with t(4;14) (10%) in our study as opposed to the 64% in the Leleu report. Table 1. Best Response (IMWG Criteria) n (%) Overall (N = 117) Lenalidomide-refractory (n = 101) Bortezomib-refractory (n = 94) Double-Refractory (N = 81) ORR (>= PR) 70 (60) 59 (58) 52 (55) 44 (54) CBR (>= MR) 78 (67) 66 (65) 83 (88) 51 (61) sCR 6 (5) 6 (6) 5 (5) 5 (6) CR 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) VGPR 20 (17) 15 (15) 14 (15) 9 (11) PR 43 (37) 37 (37) 32 (34) 29 (36) MR 8 (7) 7 (7) 7 (9) 7 (9) SD 29 (25) 23 (23) 24 (26) 20 (25) PD 10 (9) 10 (10) 8 (9) 8 (10) Disclosures Mark: Calgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Off label use of clarithromycin in combination with pomalidomide for treatment of relapsed myeloma. . Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Pearse:Celegen: Consultancy. Pekle:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Perry:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Coleman:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Huang:Celgene: Research Funding. Chen-Kiang:Celgene: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document