Non-Warfarin Oral Anticoagulants in Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133
Author(s):  
Paul Kunk ◽  
B. Gail Macik ◽  
Melissa Rice

Abstract Introduction: Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a serious and deadly disorder leading to a significant risk of thrombi, requiring lifelong therapeutic anticoagulation. Traditionally, the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin has been considered standard of care in this patient population. However, the VKAs require frequent laboratory monitoring, have a narrow therapeutic window, numerous drug interactions and dietary restrictions. Due to these factors, many patients suffer recurrent thrombi and/or major bleeding, warranting therapy modification or switching to parenteral anticoagulants. The non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs), specifically the direct Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban, have been approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and represent attractive options for these patients. Methods: We designed a retrospective analysis of all patients at the University of Virginia with APS that were treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban since September 2011. All patients were required to have a definitive diagnosis of APS [defined by the Sydney criteria as an arterial or venous thrombosis and IgM and/or IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody >40GLP, IgG and/or IgM beta-2 glycoprotein >99th percentile, and/or positive lupus anticoagulant (e.g. prolonged silica clot time or dilute Russell viper venom time)]. Patients were reviewed for recurrent thrombi, severe bleeding or other complications that led to changes in their management. Results: Sixty-six patients were identified with suspected APS, with 18 being treated with a NOAC. Of these, 10 had definitive APS per the Sydney criteria and were analyzed. 6/10 (60%) were treated with apixaban and 4/10 (40%) were treated with rivaroxaban. No patients developed severe bleeding or thrombotic complications and none required changes of their therapy. 30% started a NOAC as the first line outpatient regimen with the remaining 70% being previously treated with other anticoagulants. 7/10 (70%) were treated with warfarin and 3 patients were treated with fondaparinux before changing to a NOAC. Reasons for stopping warfarin were difficulty managing INRs (33%) or thrombi while on warfarin (66%). Of those previously on fondaparinux, reasons for changing therapy were transient ischemic attack (33%), difficulty with injections (33%) and cost (33%). Of these 10 patients, safe and effective anticoagulation with a NOAC was noted for up to 36 months without adverse effects. Conclusion: Apixaban and rivaroxaban showed to be a safe and effective first line outpatient regimen for patients with APS or patients with APS who develop recurrent thrombi on warfarin or parenteral anticoagulation. Further prospective studies are needed before their use should be considered standard of care. Table 1. Patients with Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Treated with Non-Warfarin Oral Anticoagulant Patient First Positive Test Second Positive Test Serum Testing Performed off Warfarin Anticoagulant Length of Treatment (in months) Bleeding Complications Thrombotic Complications Prior Anticoagulant Use Reason Therapy was Changed 1 Cardiolipin IgG 52, β2 IgG >112 Cardiolipin IgG 76, β2 IgG >112; RVVT prolonged No Apixaban 8 None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 2 Cardiolipin IgG >15;RVVT prolonged Cardiolipin IgG >15;RVVT prolonged Yes Apixaban 6 None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 3 Cardiolipin & β2 >112 Cardiolipin & β2 >112 Yes Apixaban 2 None None Yes (warfarin) Stroke while on warfarin 4 Cardiolipin IgM 66, β2 IgM 68 Cardiolipin IgM 98, β2 IgM 87 Yes Apixaban 8 None None No N/A 5 β2 IgG 122;+ LA Cardiolipin & β2 >112 No Apixaban 7 None None Yes (warfarin) Multiple strokes while on warfarin 6 β2 IgM 29;+ LA Cardiolipin IgM 50, β2 IgM 74RVVT prolonged Yes Apixaban 4 None None Yes (Fondaparinux) Difficulty with injections 7 Cardiolipin IgG 73 Cardiolipin IgG & β2 IgG>112;RVVT prolonged Yes Rivaroxaban 36 None None Yes (warfarin & fondaparinux) Thrombi on warfarin & fondaparinux 8 Cardiolipin IgG>112;RVVT prolonged Cardiolipin IgG>112 Yes* Rivaroxaban 2 None None Yes (warfarin) Difficult to control INR 9 Cardiolipin IgM & β2 IgM>112 Cardiolipin IgM & β2 IgM>112 Yes* Rivaroxaban 15 None None No N/A 10 β2 IgG>100RVVT prolonged β2 IgG>100;RVVT prolonged No Rivaroxaban 31 None None Yes (warfarin & fondaparinux) Thrombi on warfarin & fondaparinux *Second serum testing drawn while on rivaroxaban Disclosures Off Label Use: Apixaban and rivaroxaban use in patients with Anti-phospholipid Syndrome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (14) ◽  
pp. 1019-1027
Author(s):  
John B Bossaer ◽  
Kelly L Covert

AbstractPurposeThis review summarizes the available evidence concerning direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer as well as pertinent safety data on the use of DOACs in patients with both cancer and atrial fibrillation.SummaryThe introduction of DOACs into clinical practice changed the way thrombotic complications are managed and prevented in diverse patient populations, including VTE and atrial fibrillation. Low-molecular-weight heparins have been the standard of care for treating VTE in cancer patients due to superiority over vitamin K antagonists in preventing recurrent VTE. Therefore, widespread DOAC use for VTE in patients with active cancer has not been adopted.ConclusionRecent randomized clinical trials (SELECT-D, Hokusai VTE Cancer) have provided evidence that DOACs may have a role in treating VTE in cancer patients.



2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110311
Author(s):  
Chiun Hsu ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Hui-Chuan Sun ◽  
Arndt Vogel ◽  
Ahmed O. Kaseb

In light of positive efficacy and safety findings from the IMbrave150 trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, this novel combination has become the preferred first-line standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several additional trials are ongoing that combine an immune checkpoint inhibitor with another agent such as a multiple kinase inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent. Therefore, the range of first-line treatment options for unresectable HCC is likely to increase, and healthcare providers need succinct information about the use of such combinations, including their efficacy and key aspects of their safety profiles. Here, we review efficacy and safety data on combination immunotherapies and offer guidance on monitoring and managing adverse events, especially those associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Because of their underlying liver disease and high likelihood of portal hypertension, patients with unresectable HCC are at particular risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and this risk may be exacerbated by treatments that include antiangiogenic agents. Healthcare providers also need to be alert to the risks of proteinuria and hypertension, colitis, hepatitis, and reactivation of hepatitis B or C virus infection. They should also be aware of the possibility of rarer but potentially life-threatening adverse events such as pneumonitis and cardiovascular events. Awareness of the risks associated with these therapies and knowledge of adverse event monitoring and management will become increasingly important as the therapeutic range broadens in unresectable HCC.



2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Recie Davern ◽  
Helena Hobbs ◽  
Hannah Murugan ◽  
Paul Cotter

Abstract Background Patients prescribed oral anticoagulants (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can still present with stroke. The mechanism for stroke in these patients can be due to multiple factors including subtherapeutic dosing and non-compliance. With the increasing use of direct-acting OACs (DOACs) in favour of warfarin, it is unclear if the incidence of stroke in those already taking OAC has reduced. Methods Data was extracted from our unit’s stroke registry, a prospectively maintained database, for patients who presented with stroke while receiving OAC for AF from 2013 to 2017. Type of OAC, type of stroke, OAC dosing at time of event including non-compliance, stroke management and outcome were recorded. Results 67 patients were included for analysis, with 55 ischaemic and 12 haemorrhagic strokes. 52 patients were receiving warfarin at the time of their stroke vs. 15 receiving DOACs. 33/55 (60%) of ischaemic strokes occurred in patients taking warfarin with a sub-therapeutic INR. In 3/55 (5%) of ischaemic strokes, the OAC was held for a procedure while in 6/55 cases (11%) the OAC had been stopped for another reasons e.g. bleeding. 5/55 (7%) were due to non-compliance. 1 ischaemic stroke was due to under-dosing of a DOAC (dabigatran). 16 strokes were recorded in 2013 for patients prescribed OAC vs. 3 in 2017. Overall the number of ischaemic strokes due to subtherapeutic OAC decreased from 14 in 2013 to 1 in 2017 (p value 0.06). Conclusion The majority of strokes occurring in anticoagulated patients are related to warfarin use. We observed an almost significant reduction in the proportion of ischaemic strokes due to under-dosing of OAC over the study period. Warfarin continues to be recommended as the first line anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation by the HSE Medicines Management Programme, a decision which we would argue warrants review.



Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 952
Author(s):  
Lucy Dumas ◽  
Rebecca Bowen ◽  
John Butler ◽  
Susana Banerjee

Older women with ovarian cancer have disproportionately poorer survival outcomes than their younger counterparts and receive less treatment. In order to understand where the gaps lie in the treatment of older patients, studies incorporating more detailed assessment of baseline characteristics and treatment delivery beyond the scope of most cancer registries are required. We aimed to assess the proportion of women over the age of 65 who are offered and receive standard of care for first-line ovarian cancer at two UK NHS Cancer Centres over a 5-year period (December 2009 to August 2015). Standard of care treatment was defined as a combination of cytoreductive surgery and if indicated platinum-based chemotherapy (combination or single-agent). Sixty-five percent of patients aged 65 and above received standard of care treatment. Increasing age was associated with lower rates of receiving standard of care (35% > 80 years old versus 78% of 65–69-year-olds, p = 0.000). Older women were less likely to complete the planned chemotherapy course (p = 0.034). The oldest women continue to receive lower rates of standard care compared to younger women. Once adjusted for Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and first-line treatment received, age was no longer an independent risk factor for poorer overall survival. Optimisation of vulnerable patients utilising a comprehensive geriatric assessment and directed interventions to facilitate the delivery of standard of care treatment could help narrow the survival discrepancy between the oldest patients and their younger counterparts.



2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ix88-ix89
Author(s):  
S.H. Park ◽  
D. Castellano ◽  
D.P. Petrylak ◽  
M.D. Galsky ◽  
M.S. van der Heijden ◽  
...  




Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 506
Author(s):  
Selina K. Wong ◽  
Wade T. Iams

After being stagnant for decades, there has finally been a paradigm shift in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with the emergence and application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Multiple trials of first-line ICI-chemotherapy combinations have demonstrated survival benefit compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, establishing this as the new standard of care. ICIs are now being applied in the potentially curative limited-stage setting, actively being investigated as concurrent treatment with chemoradiation and as adjuvant treatment following completion of chemoradiation. This review highlights the evidence behind the practice-changing addition of ICIs in the first-line setting of extensive-stage SCLC, the potentially practice-changing immunotherapy trials that are currently underway in the limited-stage setting, and alternate immunotherapeutic strategies being studied in the treatment of SCLC.



Author(s):  
Ozgur Karcioglu ◽  
Sehmus Zengin ◽  
Bilgen Ozkaya ◽  
Eylem Ersan ◽  
Sarper Yilmaz ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Direct (new) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a contemporary and promising option in the treatment of thromboses and VTE, while protecting the coagulation cascade against untoward bleeding events. They are used in the management and prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and other thrombotic diseases. The most prominent complication of these agents is bleeding. These agents have similar or lower rates of major intracranial hemorrhages, while they had a higher risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding when compared to warfarin. This manuscript is aimed to revise and update the literature findings to outline the side effects of DOACs in various clinical scenarios. Methods: A narrative review of currently published studies was performed. Online database searches were performed for clinical trials published before July 2021, on the efficacy and adverse effects attributed to the anticoagulant treatment, especially DOACs. A literature search via electronic databases was carried out, beginning with the usage of the agents in the Western Languages papers. The search terms initially included direct (new) oral anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, idarucizumab, andexanet, prothrombin complex concentrates, and fresh frozen plasma. Papers were examined for methodological soundness before being included. Results: Severe bleeding episodes require aggressive interventions for successful management. Therefore, bleeding should be evaluated in special regard to the location and rate of hemorrhage, and total volume of blood loss. Patient's age, weight and organ dysfunctions (e.g., kidney/liver failure or chronic respiratory diseases) directly affect the clinical course of overdose. Conclusion: Management recommendations for hemorrhage associated with DOAC use vary, depending on the class of the culprit agent (direct thrombin inhibitor vs. FXa inhibitor), the clinical status of the patient (mild/ moderate vs. severe/life-threatening), and capabilities of the institution. Specific reversal agents (i.e., idarucizumab and andexanet alfa) can be used if available, while prothrombin complex concentrates, fresh frozen plasma and/ or tranexamic acid can also be employed as nonspecific replacement agents in the management of DOAC-related bleeding diathesis.



2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. ix150 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Planchard ◽  
M. Boyer ◽  
J.-S. Lee ◽  
A. Dechaphunkul ◽  
P. Cheema ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document