Azacitidine (AZA) Combined with Idarubicin in Higher Risk MDS - Results of a Phase I/II Study By the Groupe Francophone Des Myelodysplasies (GFM)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2884-2884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Sebert ◽  
Aspasia Stamatoullas ◽  
Thorsten Braun ◽  
Jacques Delaunay ◽  
Benoît de Renzis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Hypomethylating agents, especially AZA, have become the reference treatment of higher risk MDS, but the median survival of about 2 years obtained with AZA remains modest, and must be further improved. In addition, AZA yields only about 30% of marrow responses (including CR+PR+marrow CR). Intensive chemotherapy combining Idarubicin (IDA) and AraC yields 30 to 50 % CR in higher risk MDS (Beran and all, cancer 2001) and IDA, as single agent, induces about 30% CR in elderly AML patients (Carella, haematologica 1990). We designed a phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of AZA and IDA (1 day during each AZA cycle) in higher risk MDS patients (NCT01305135). Methods: Main Inclusion criteria were: (1) IPSS int-2 or high MDS, or CMML with WBC < 13 G/l and marrow blasts > 10%, or AML with 20-30% marrow blasts (2) Age ≥ 18 years (3) Performance Status (PS) <=2 (4) no prior treatment, except ESAs. Patients received AZA 75 mg/m2/d SC x7d every 4 weeks combined, on day 8 of each cycle (for the first 9 cycles), with IDA 5 mg/m2 (IV) in a first cohort of 10 patients, escalated to 10 mg/m2 IV in a second cohort of 10 patients, followed by an extension study in 21 patients with the IDA 10 mg/m2 schedule. The primary endpoint of the study was response after 6 cycles according to IWG 2006 criteria. Results: Between Dec 2010 and Jan 2014, 41 patients (from 13 centers) were enrolled, including 13 women and 28 men with a median age of 74 years [IQR 70; 76]. At inclusion, WHO classification was RCMD in 1 pt, CMML in 2 pts, RAEB-1 in 10 pts, RAEB-2 in 13 pts, AML in 12 pts and unclassified MDS in 3 pts. Median marrow blast % was 9.5 [IQR: 6-19.9] and karyotype according to IPSS was favorable in 12 (29%), intermediate in 9 (22%) and unfavorable in 18 pts (44%) (2 cytogenetic failures). IPSS was int-2 and high in 56% and 44%, respectively. PS was 0 in 39%, 1 in 55% and 2 in 6% pts. 10 patients received 5 mg/m2 of idarubicin (cohort 1) and 31 received 10 mg/m2 (cohort 2). 375 cycles of AZA were administered (219 of them with AZA+IDA, as IDA was used only for the first 9 cycles), with a median number of 6 cycles/patient (median 6 in the IDA 5 mg/m2 cohort and 4 in the 10 mg/m2 cohort (p=0.9). Of the 41 patients enrolled, 20(48.8%, 95%CI: 32.9-64.9) achieved response (6 CR, 7 PR, 4 mCR and 3 stable disease with HI) with no difference between the two cohorts (50% vs 48%) and a marrow response rate (CR + PR + mCR) of 41,5%. Thirteen of the 22 patients with abnormal karyotype were evaluable for cytogenetic response: 5 achieved cytogenetic response (4 complete, 1 partial), 1 in cohort 1 and 4 in cohort 2. With a median follow up of 14 months, 9 of the 20 responders had relapsed. Median response duration was 11 months [3.2-42.7], with no difference between the two cohorts. Median OS was 14.3 months [IC95%: 12.5; NA] and 2y OS was 24.8%, with no significant difference between the 2 cohorts (p=0.43). By univariate analysis no baseline parameter including gender, karyotype, marrow blast %, IPSS and IDA dosage (5 or 10 mg/m2), had any significant impact on response or survival. 45 SAEs were reported in 26 patients, including febrile neutropenia (n=25), bleeding (n=7) and 2 non-clinically significant reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (1 transient, and 1 persisting without symptoms). The number of infections per cycle [9/85 (10%) in the IDA 5 mg/m2 arm and 38/281 (14%) in the IDA 10 mg/m2 arm] and the number of bleeding events (9% vs 17%) did not significantly differ between the two cohorts. Conclusion: In our experience, Idarubicin (on day 8 of each cycle) can be combined to Azacitidine without any additional toxicity. The marrow response rate obtained with the combination (41.5%) may be higher than with AZA alone. We are currently comparing in higher risk MDS patients this AZA-IDA combination versus AZA alone (and other combinations of AZA with other drugs) in a prospective randomized GFM trial. Disclosures Sebert: Celgene: Research Funding. Fenaux:Celgene: Research Funding.

Liposomal doxorubicin (M) plus gemcitabine (G) as first line treatment in metastatic breast carcinoma: A phase I-II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10651-10651 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Colomer ◽  
I. Tusquets ◽  
L. Calvo ◽  
J. Dorca ◽  
E. Adrover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Grade Iii

10651 Background: We designed a phase I-II trial to determine the combination dose of liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) plus gemcitabine (Gemzar), and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the regimen Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer, untreated distant metastasis, age >18 years old, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50% and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function were included in the study. Patients received up to six cycles of treatment. No G-CSF support was used prophylactically. LVEF was repeated at 3, and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Results: Phase I: After 6 patients, the recommended dose was M (55 mg/m2) D1 and G (900 mg/m2) D1 and 8, administered every 21 days. Phase II: 53 patients have been enrolled; 52 are included in the safety analysis and 42 in the efficacy analysis. The median age of the population was 61 years of age (32–79). ECOG PS was 0 in 55%, 1 in 41%, 2 in 4%. Postmenopausal status in 87%. Main histology was ductal carcinoma (85%). Prior adjuvant anthracyclines had been administered in 19 cases (median dose of doxorubicin: 300 mg/m2, or epirubicin: 425 mg/m2). Metastasic lesions were in liver (25), lung (17), bone (16), and lymph nodes (25). Patients received a median number of 5 cycles (range 1–6). Median relative dose intensity was 83% for M and 75% for G. Grade III-IV hematologic toxicity per administered cycles was: leukopenia (21.9%), neutropenia (31.2%), febrile neutropenia (4 %), and thrombocytopenia (7.4%). Grade III-IV non-hematologic toxicities were stomatitis (4.8%), nausea (1.7%), vomiting (2.2%), asthenia (2.6%) and diarrhea (0.8%). Thirteen of 52 pts (25%) had alopecia grade III-IV. No signs or symptoms of cardiac impairment have been seen. An objective response rate of 62% was obtained (95% CI: 45.6- 76.4%). Two patients had complete response (4.8%), 24 partial response (57.1%), 10 stable disease and 6 progressive disease. The response rate was similar in patients with or without previous adjuvant anthracyclines (68.5% and 61%, respectively). Conclusions: The combination of liposomal doxorubicin plus gemcitabine has high efficacy and low toxicity in advanced breast cancer patients, and may be a valuable option in patients that have received adjuvant anthracyclines. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The stress hyperglycaemia ratio is associated with left ventricular remodelling after first acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Meng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Kesen Liu ◽  
Ruofei Jia ◽  
Jing Nan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Stress Hyperglycaemia ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Time

Abstract Background Left ventricular negative remodelling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is considered as the major cause for the poor prognosis. But the predisposing factors and potential mechanisms of left ventricular negative remodelling after STEMI remain not fully understood. The present research mainly assessed the association between the stress hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) and left ventricular negative remodelling. Methods We recruited 127 first-time, anterior, and acute STEMI patients in the present study. All enrolled patients were divided into 2 subgroups equally according to the median value of SHR level (1.191). Echocardiography was conducted within 24 h after admission and 6 months post-STEMI to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD). Changes in echocardiography parameters (δLVEF, δLVEDD, δLVESD) were calculated as LVEF, LVEDD, and LVESD at 6 months after infarction minus baseline LVEF, LVEDD and LVESD, respectively. Results In the present study, the mean SHR was 1.22 ± 0.25 and there was significant difference in SHR between the 2 subgroups (1.05 (0.95, 1.11) vs 1.39 (1.28, 1.50), p < 0.0001). The global LVEF at 6 months post-STEMI was significantly higher in the low SHR group than the high SHR group (59.37 ± 7.33 vs 54.03 ± 9.64, p  = 0.001). Additionally, the global LVEDD (49.84 ± 5.10 vs 51.81 ± 5.60, p  = 0.040) and LVESD (33.27 ± 5.03 vs 35.38 ± 6.05, p  = 0.035) at 6 months after STEMI were lower in the low SHR group. Most importantly, after adjusting through multivariable linear regression analysis, SHR remained associated with δLVEF (beta = −9.825, 95% CI −15.168 to −4.481, p  < 0.0001), δLVEDD (beta = 4.879, 95% CI 1.725 to 8.069, p  = 0.003), and δLVESD (beta = 5.079, 95% CI 1.421 to 8.738, p  = 0.007). Conclusions In the present research, we demonstrated for the first time that SHR is significantly correlated with left ventricular negative remodelling after STEMI.

scholarly journals CORRELATION BETWEEN VAS OPRESSIN CONCENTRATION AND CHRONIC HEART FAILURE SEVE RITY: CHARAC TERISTICS OF PA TIENTS WITH TERMINAL AND DECOMPE NSA TED HEART FAILURE

The Clinician ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
E. S. Trofimov ◽  
A. S. Poskrebysheva ◽  
N. А. Shostak
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Classes

Objective: to evaluate vasopressin (VP) concentration in patients with varying severity of chronic heart failure (CHF), intensity of clinical symptoms, and decreased level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Materials and methods. In total, 120 patients (44 males, 76 females) with CHF of varying genesis (mean age 72.12 ± 10.18 years) and 30 clinically healthy individuals (18 males, 12 females) as a control group (mean age 33.4 ± 6.23 years) were examined. All patients underwent comprehensive clinical and instrumental examination in accordance with the standards for patients with CHF. The VP level was determined using ELISA. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics v. 23 software.Results. The patients with CHF had significantly higher blood VP levels compared to the control group (72.91 ± 53.9 pg/ml versus 6.6 ± 3.2 pg/ml respectively; p <0.01). At the same time, patients with stage III CHF had significantly lower VP levels than patients with stages IIВ and IIА (35.61 ± 21.53 pg/ml versus 71.67 ± 48.31 pg/ml and 86.73 ± 59.78 pg/ml respectively; p<0.01). A similar picture was observed for the functional classes (FC). For instance, for CHF FC II and III, the VP level was 91.93 ± 67.13 pg/ml and 77.95 ± 54.01 pg/ml respectively, while for FC IV it decreased to 50.49 ± 28.18 pg/ml (p <0.01). The VP concentration in patients who subsequently perished was significantly lower than in patients who survived (48.79 ± 26.30 pg/ml versus 79.72 ± 57.73 pg/ml; p = 0.012). Moreover, in patients with LVEF <50 %, the VP level was significantly lower than in patients with LVEF >50 % (59.43 ± 42.51 pg/ml versus 86.43 ± 62.46 pg/ml respectively; p <0.05).Conclusion. The observed significant differences in VP in patients with stage III and IV CFH can indicate depletion of neurohumoral mediators in this patient category. However, a correlation between the VP level and the level of LVEF decrease can indicate a significant difference in the role of VP in CHF pathogenesis in patients with preserved and decreased LVEF. This observation requires further research.

Abstract P232: Screening Past B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Values to Identify Candidates for Treatment of Systolic Dysfunction

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin ◽  
Paul Heidenreich
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: BNP testing is now common though it is not clear if the test results are used to improve patient care. A high BNP may be an indicator that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is low (<40%) such that the patient will benefit from life-prolonging therapy. Objective: To determine how often clinicians obtained a measure of LVEF (echocardiography, nuclear) following a high BNP value when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not known to be low (<40%). Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of 296 consecutive patients (inpatient or outpatient) with a BNP values of at least 200 pg/ml at a single medical center (tertiary hospital with 8 community clinics). A prior diagnosis of heart failure was made in 65%, while 42% had diabetes, 79% had hypertension, 59% had ischemic heart disease and 31% had chronic lung disease. The mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 75% were white, 10% black, 15% other and the mean BNP was 810 ± 814 pg/ml. The LVEF was known to be < 40% in 84 patients (28%, mean BNP value of 1094 ± 969 pg/ml). Of the remaining 212 patients without a known low LVEF, 161 (76%) had a prior LVEF >=40% ( mean BNP value of 673 ± 635 pg/ml), and 51 (24%) had no prior LVEF documented (mean BNP 775 ± 926 pg/ml). Following the high BNP, a measure of LVEF was obtained (including outside studies documented by the primary care provider) within 6 months in only 53% (113 of 212) of those with an LVEF not known to be low. Of those with a follow-up echocardiogram, the LVEF was <40% in 18/113 (16%) and >=40% in 95/113 (84%). There was no significant difference in mean initial BNP values between those with a follow-up LVEF <40% (872 ± 940pg/ml), >=40% (704 ± 737 pg/ml), or not done (661 ± 649 pg/ml, p=0.5). Conclusions: Follow-up measures of LVEF did not occur in almost 50% of patients with a high BNP where the information may have led to institution of life-prolonging therapy. Of those that did have a follow-up study a new diagnosis of depressesd LVEF was noted in 16%. Screening of existing BNP and LVEF data and may be an efficient strategy to identify patients that may benefit from life-prolonging therapy for heart failure.

Abstract 17014: Cardiologist Assessment and Approval Was the Primary Predictor of Kidney Transplant Candidacy and Transplantation Among Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Madden ◽  
Rory Gallen ◽  
Lisa LeMond ◽  
D Eric Steidley ◽  
Mira Keddis
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Selection Committee ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Esrd Patients ◽  
Primary Predictor

Introduction: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) are often denied kidney transplantation (KTx). The aims of this study were to explore factors predictive of suitability for KTx and to assess cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) presenting for KTx evaluation. Methods: We evaluated 109 consecutive adults with LVEF≤40% at the time of initial KTx evaluation between 2013 and 2018. Post-transplant CV outcomes were defined as non-fatal MI, admission for HF, CV death and all-cause mortality. Results: Mean age was 58.2 years (SD11.9), 78% were male, 58% had diabetes, 70% had history of CV events and 42% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Mean LVEF was 31.5% (SD 6.47). Eighty patients had nuclear stress imaging; 10% were positive for reversible ischemia and 43% for prior infarct. Mean VO2max was 14.4(SD 5.71)ml/kg/min (31 patients). A cardiologist evaluated 93% of patients and was present at 58% of selection committee meetings. Twenty-four patients (22%) were denied by a cardiologist for KTx and 59 (54%) were denied by the selection committee, of whom 43 were due to CV risk. On univariate analysis, the variables associated with denial for KTx were: cardiologist denial, denial due to CV risk, Native American race (6% of cohort), higher NT-pro-BNP, prior MI, coronary intervention, positive stress study, anemia, lower EF and lower VO2max (all p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, cardiologist denial was the only significant predictor of denial for KTx (OR: 29.4, p=0.0007). At median follow-up of 15 months, 5 (5%) suffered non-fatal MI, 13 (12%) were hospitalized for HF exacerbation and 17 (16%) died. Only 22 (20%) underwent KTx. Post-KTx, there was one death, one non-fatal MI and 3 hospitalizations for HF. Mean LVEF improvement was 16% (SD12.9). Conclusions: Only 38% of ESRD patients with LVEF≤40% presenting for KTx evaluation were approved and of those, only 52% received KTx. Cardiologist approval was the primary predictor of suitability for KTx. Despite careful selection, prevalence of CV events and mortality after KTx was 23%. There is need for a consistent multidisciplinary approach during KTx evaluation, including cardiologist input, to improve CV outcomes.

Abstract 12976: Malignant Type of Electrical Storm in Patients With an Implantable Cardiac Shock Device: Results From the Nippon Storm Study

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Noda ◽  
Takashi Kurita ◽  
Takashi Nitta ◽  
Hiroshi Frushima ◽  
Naoki Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shock Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Electrical Storm ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cardiac Shock ◽  
Multiple Episodes

Introduction: Electrical storm (ES) referred to as multiple device therapies is an important clinical problem in patients (pts) with an implantable cardiac shock device (ICSD), such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy device with defibrillator. Detailed clinical aspects of ES, however, remain unclear in the Asian large population. Methods: We analyzed the data of the Nippon Storm Study which was a prospective observational study and consisted of 1570 pts enrolled from 48 Japanese ICSD centers designed to clarify the clinical aspects of ES. The study population included 493 (31%) pts with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 357 (23%) pts with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). They had a mean LVEF of 43±19 %. Results: ES occurred in 96 (6.4%) pts during a median follow-up of 28 (23-33) months. Compared to pts without ES, pts with ES showed a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (43% vs 38 %, respectively, p=0.005). No significant difference regarding ES incidence was observed between pts with IHD and pts with DCM (log-rank p=0.77). A sub-analysis of the ES characteristics revealed that the mortality in patients with shock therapy during the first ES episode and those with the incidence of multiple episodes of ES during the follow-up was significantly higher than those without (12/18 vs 30/78; p=0.03, 12/18 vs 26/78, p<0.01, respectively, Table). Conclusions: Shock therapy during the first ES episode and multiple episodes of ES were related to significantly higher mortality in pts with ICSD. There can be a malignant entity of ES.

Abstract 17072: Discordance Between Lactic Acid Elevation and Invasive Hemodynamics in Decompensated Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Narang ◽  
Bow Chung ◽  
Ann Nguyen ◽  
Teruhiko Imamura ◽  
Sara Kalantari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Lactic Acid ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Invasive Hemodynamics

Introduction: Elevated lactic acid (LA) levels carry a poor prognosis in patients admitted with shock. Data is lacking on the association of LA level with the severity of decompensated heart failure (HF). This study assesses the relationship between LA levels, invasive hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients presenting to the cardiac care unit with decompensated HF between 2015-18 were prospectively enrolled into an invasive hemodynamics study. LA (normal 0.7-2.1 mmol/L) levels were obtained within 12 hours prior to right heart catheterization (RHC). No significant changes in therapy were made in the time between LA level collection & RHC. Patients were divided into 4 groups: 1) normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (< 18 mmHg)/ normal Fick cardiac index (CI) (≥ 2.2 L/min/m 2 ), 2) normal PCWP/ low CI (< 2.2 L/min/m 2 ) 3) elevated PCWP (≥ 18 mmHg )/ normal CI, 4) elevated PCWP / low CI. Results: 80 patients were enrolled. Mean age 58±14 years; 78% male, left ventricular ejection fraction was 24±4%. Prior to RHC, 55% patients were on vasoactives and/or inotropes. Mean (SD) PCWP was 26 ± 8.8 mmHg and mean CI was 2.06 ± 0.61 L/min/m 2 . Overall 48 (60%) of the patients had high PCWP and low CI (group 4). 81% had normal LA (≤2.1 mmol/L) prior to RHC. There was no correlation between LA level and PCWP (R=0.12; p=0.30); there was a moderate inverse correlation between LA level and CI (R=-0.40; p<0.01). Only 25% of patients with the highest risk hemodynamic profile (elevated PCWP/low CI) had an elevated LA level (Figure A). 90- day all cause mortality was 33% When LA was stratified by tertile, there was no significant difference in mortality between the tertiles (Figure B). Conclusion: In patients with decompensated HF, normal LA levels do not exclude the presence of cardiogenic shock with profoundly impaired cardiac output. Invasive assessment of hemodynamics should not be delayed based on LA level alone.

Abstract 15436: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and MACE in Women With Signs and Symptoms of Ischemia: Data From the WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation)

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Wu ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Jenna Maughan ◽  
Leslee J Shaw ◽  
Sheryl F Kelsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Relatively high left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (>65%) in women was recently associated with higher all-cause mortality over 6 years follow-up in the CONFIRM study. We sought to evaluate high EF and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Methods: The WISE original cohort (enrolled 1996-2000) is a multicenter prospective study of women with suspected ischemic heart disease undergoing clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography. We investigated the relationship between high (>65%) and normal (55-65%) EF and MACE, defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and heart failure (HF) hospitalization using Kaplan Meier (KM) and regression analyses. Results: A total of 653 women were included (298 high and 355 normal EF). Mean age was 58±11 years and mean EF was 68±7%. There was no significant difference in MACE by EF group over a 10-year follow-up period (log rank p=0.54, Figure ). When patients were stratified by the presence of obstructive CAD, MACE rates remained similar between high and normal EF. High EF was not associated with stroke or HF but had a lower MI risk (log rank p=0.03, Table ). EF was not associated with MACE in a multivariable regression model. Conclusions: Among women presenting with evidence of ischemia, there was no significant difference in MACE between high and normal EF groups. High EF was associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction as an individual component of MACE.

The Relationship Between N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level and Myocardial Performance Index and Their Prognostic Importances in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Short Term Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Mehmet Küçükosmanoğlu ◽  
Cihan Örem
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ejection Time ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship

Introduction: MPI is an echocardiographic parameter that exibit the left ventricular functions globally. NT-proBNP  is an important both diagnostic and prognostic factor in heart failure. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of serum NT-proBNP levels and MPI in patients with STEMI. Method: Totally 104 patients with a diagnosis of STEMI were included in the study. Patients followed for 30-days and questioned for presence of symptoms of heart failure (HF) and cardiac death. Patients were invited for outpatient control after 30-days and were divided into two groups: (HF (+) group) and (HF (-) group). Results: Totally 104 patients with STEMI were hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit. Of those patients, 17 were female (16%), 87 were male (84%), and the mean age of the patients was 58.9±10.8 years. During the 30-day follow-up, 28 (27%) of 104 patients developed HF. The mean age, hypertension ratio and anterior STEMI rate were significantly higher in the HF (+) group compared to the HF (-) group. Ejection time (ET) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly lower and MPI was significantly higher in the HF (+) group. When the values on day first and  sixth were compared, NT-ProBNP levels were decreased in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the change in MPI values on the first and sixth days. Multiple regression analysis showed that the presence of anterior MI, first day NT-proBNP level and LVEF were independently associated with development of HF and death. Conclusion: In our study, NT-proBNP levels were found to be positively associated with MPI in patients with acute STEMI. It was concluded that the level of NT-proBNP detected especially on the 1st day was more valuable than MPI in determining HF development and prognosis after STEMI.  

scholarly journals Prediction of low-voltage areas using modified APPLE score

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timm Seewöster ◽  
Falco Kosich ◽  
Philipp Sommer ◽  
Livio Bertagnolli ◽  
Gerhard Hindricks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Voltage ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Signal Amplitude ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves ◽  
Density Maps ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Study Population

Abstract Aims The presence of low-voltage areas (LVAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) reflects left atrial (LA) electroanatomical substrate, which is essential for individualized AF management. However, echocardiographic anteroposterior LA diameter included into previous LVAs prediction scores does not mirror LA size accurately and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) is not directly associated with atrial myopathy. Therefore, we aimed to compare a modified (m)APPLE score, which included LA volume (LAV) and LA emptying fraction (LA-EF) with the regular APPLE score for the prediction of LVAs. Methods and results In patients undergoing first AF catheter ablation, LVAs were determined peri-interventionally using high-density maps and defined as signal amplitude &lt;0.5 mV. All patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging before intervention. The APPLE (one point for Age ≥ 65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, LA diameter ≥ 43 mm, and LVEF &lt; 50%) and (m)APPLE (last two variables changed by LAV ≥ 39 mL/m2, and LA-EF &lt; 31%) scores were calculated at baseline. The study population included 219 patients [median age 65 (interquartile range 57–72) years, 41% females, 59% persistent AF, 25% LVAs]. Both scores were significantly associated with LVAs [OR 1.817, 95% CI 1.376–2.399 for APPLE and 2.288, 95% CI 1.650–3.172 for (m)APPLE]. Using receiver operating characteristic curves analysis, the (m)APPLE score [area under the curve (AUC) 0.779, 95% CI 0.702–0.855] showed better LVAs prediction than the APPLE score (AUC 0.704, 95% CI 0.623–0.784), however, without statistically significant difference (P = 0.233). Conclusion The modified (m)APPLE score demonstrated good prognostic value for LVAs prediction and was comparable with the regular APPLE score.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document