Safety and Tolerability of Obinutuzumab (GA101) with Shorter Duration of Infusion in Japanese Patients with Previously Untreated CD20-Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)-Comparison with GAO4915g (GATHER) and BO21005 (GOYA) Studies

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5389-5389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Tsujimura ◽  
Kyoya Kumagai ◽  
Takanori Teshima ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake ◽  
Koji Izutsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Phase ◽  
Type I ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Background Obinutuzumab (GA101) is a novel humanized, glycoengineered Type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. It has greater direct cell death induction and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and lower complement-dependent cytotoxicity than Type I anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Studies of obinutuzumab in patients (pts) with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory NHL demonstrated clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were the most common adverse event, typically associated with the first infusion. Obinutuzumab 1000 mg is being administered over 4 hrs 15 min for the first infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, and over 3 hrs 15 min for subsequent infusions. Shortening administration times can result in greater patient convenience and more efficient use of infusion facilities. To evaluate the tolerability of a Shorter Duration of Infusion (SDI), we conducted a Phase II study (JO29737, JapicCTI-152848, 'GATS') of G-CHOP (obinutuzumab in combination with CHOP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone]) in Japanese pts with previously untreated CD20-positive B-cell NHL. Methods This study included adult pts with previously untreated CD20-positive B-cell NHL. Treatment consisted of 8 cycles of obinutuzumab (1000 mg intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with additional doses on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1) plus standard CHOP on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6. Obinutuzumab SDI is administered over 1 hr 30 min. Obinutuzumab was administered as an SDI from Cycle 2 to pts who met the following criteria: (1) No ≥ Gr 3 IRR related to obinutuzumab during regular infusions (RI) in Cycle 1, and (2) Lymphocyte count ≤ 5000/µL in peripheral blood prior to SDI. Primary endpoints were tolerability of SDI, pharmacokinetics (PK) of obinutuzumab. Tolerability of SDI was assessed by incidence of ≥ Gr 3 IRR in Cycle 2. Secondary endpoints were overall safety profile and efficacy. IRRs were defined as AEs related to obinutuzumab occurring during infusion or within 24 hrs from the end of infusion. Results were compared to the multicenter, open-label, randomized GOYA study (phase III, RI G-CHOP), and the multicenter, open-label, single-arm GATHER study (phase II, SDI G-CHOP). The GOYA study included 111 Japanese pts. Results At database lock date, 35 pts were enrolled and treated, including 19 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 13 follicular lymphoma, and 3 other histologies; median age was 66 yrs (range, 35-78); 12/35 female; Ann Arbor stage I 11.4%, II 25.7%, III 20.0%, IV 42.9%; 7/35 positive bone marrow involvement. In 7 pts, treatment was prematurely discontinued due to AE (n=3; infected dermal cyst, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia　aspiration, 1 pt each), progressive disease (n=2), or physician's decision (n=2). Thirty-three pts received at least one SDI of obinutuzumab, given in Cycle 2 and subsequent cycles in 31 pts. Overall, 48.6% of pts (17/35) experienced IRRs. They were Gr 1/2 in all cases and occurred most commonly on Day 1 Cycle 1 (RI). No SDI-associated IRR was observed in Cycle 2, and very rare cases (2 pts) were noted in Cycles 6, 7, and 8. IRRs occurring in ≥5% pts were pyrexia (25.7%), chills (8.6%), and nausea, blood pressure increased, and headache (5.7%). Gr ≥3 AEs observed in ≥10% of pts were neutropenia (40.0%), neutrophil count decreased (25.7%), febrile neutropenia (17.1%), and leukopenia (14.3%). Obinutuzumab concentration just after Cycle 2 SDI was the same level as the concentration in Cycle 8. This shows PK reached a steady state at Cycle 2 and was not affected by shortening of administration. From PK analysis in the GATS study, AUC7day was 4170±885 µg·day/mL and t1/2 was 15.4±7.0 day, similar to the GATHER values (AUC7day, 3300±1130 µg·day/mL; t1/2, 23.0±15.9 day) after considering individual variability. No ethnic difference was observed. Overall response rate was 82.9% (29/35) (CR 62.9% [22/35], PR 20.0% [7/35]); 2 pts were not evaluable for response. Conclusions Obinutuzumab can be safely administered as SDI. No SDI-associated IRR was observed in Cycle 2. A few IRRs were observed with SDI in later cycles, but all were tolerable and manageable. RI and SDI have comparable safety, PK, and efficacy profiles in Japanese and non-Japanese. Disclosures Hatake: Meiji-Seika: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Chugai: Research Funding. Izutsu:Abbvie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Kinoshita:Janssen: Honoraria; Solasia: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Zenyaku: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tobinai:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria; SERVIER: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma KK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Antigenic modulation limits the efficacy of anti-CD20 antibodies: implications for antibody selection

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (25) ◽  
pp. 5191-5201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Beers ◽  
Ruth R. French ◽  
H. T. Claude Chan ◽  
Sean H. Lim ◽  
Timothy C. Jarrett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Antigenic Modulation ◽  
Lymphatic Leukemia ◽  
Human B Cells ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 on B cells, is now central to the treatment of a variety of malignant and autoimmune disorders. Despite this success, a substantial proportion of B-cell lymphomas are unresponsive or develop resistance, hence more potent anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are continuously being sought. Here we demonstrate that type II (tositumomab-like) anti-CD20 mAbs are 5 times more potent than type I (rituximab-like) reagents in depleting human CD20 Tg B cells, despite both operating exclusively via activatory Fcγ receptor–expressing macrophages. Much of this disparity in performance is attributable to type I mAb-mediated internalization of CD20 by B cells, leading to reduced macrophage recruitment and the degradation of CD20/mAb complexes, shortening mAb half-life. Importantly, human B cells from healthy donors and most cases of chronic lymphatic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma, showed rapid CD20 internalization that paralleled that seen in the Tg mouse B cells, whereas most follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells were far more resistant to CD20 loss. We postulate that differences in CD20 modulation may play a central role in determining the relative efficacy of rituximab in treating these diseases and strengthen the case for focusing on type II anti-CD20 mAb in the clinic.

Aggressive Chemotherapy (CHOEP-14) and Rituximab or High-Dose Therapy (MegaCHOEP) and Rituximab for Young, High-Risk Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of the MegaCHOEP Trial of the German High — Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 404-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Matthias Haenel ◽  
Peter Borchmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Abstract 404 Comparison of conventional chemotherapy with high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) administered to young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma as part of first-line therapy gave conflicting results; none of the randomized studies used rituximab (R) in combination with conventional or HDT. In March 2003 we started a randomized phase III study for young (18-60 years), high-risk (age-adjusted IPI 2 or 3) patients with aggressive lymphoma. For patients with B-cell lymphomas this study compared 8 cycles of CHOEP-14 (CHOP + etoposide 300 mg/m2 given every 2 weeks) with MegaCHOEP. The MegaCHOEP program used cyclophoshamide (1500 mg/m2 in cycle 1; 4500 mg/m2 in cycles 2 and 3; 6000 mg/m2 in cycle 4), doxorubicin (70 mg/m2 in all cycles), vincristine (2 mg, all cycles), etoposide (600 mg/m2 , cycle 1; 960 mg/m2 , cycles 2 and 3; 1480 mg/m2, cycle 4), and prednisone (500 mg, all cycles) to be administered every 21 days. Hematopoietic stem cells were harvested after cycles 1 and 2 and reinfused after HDT cycles 2, 3, and 4. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MegaCHOEP + / - R have been described (Glass et al. Blood 2006 and BMT 2006). The phase III study originally had four arms (8 × CHOEP – 14, 8 × CHOEP – 14 and 6 × R, MegaCHOEP, and MegaCHOEP and 6 × R). Treatment arms without R were closed in June 2004 because other studies (e.g the MInT study) had shown major improvement in outcome parameters when R was added to chemotherapy. The study continued comparing 8 × CHOEP – 14 and 6 × R (375 mg/m2) with MegaCHOEP and 6 × R (375 mg/m2). At the time of this analysis 346 patients (pts) had been recruited; 216 pts. (median age 48 years, LDH > N 97 %, stage III or IV 96%, ECOG > 1 35%) had been randomized until 07 / 07 and were availabel for this planned interim analysis ( 8 × CHOEP – 14 + 6 × R, n = 91; MegaCHOEP + 6 × R, n = 94; 8 × CHOEP – 14, n = 15; MegaCHOEP, n = 16). Major toxicities included mucositis, diarrhea, and infections all of which were significantly more frequent in the MegaCHOEP arm of the study. Treatment – related deaths occurred in 5 / 94 pts. ( 5.3%) in the MegaCHOEP arm and in 1 / 91 pts. (1.1 %) in the R – CHOEP arm (p = 0.211). Surprisingly, the 3 – year event – free survival ( EFS : time from randomization to either disease progression, no CR / CRu at the end of treatment, initiation of salvage therapy, relapse or death from any cause) was better after conventional than after HDT / ASCT: 71.0% after 8 × CHOEP-14 + 6 × R vs. 56.7 % after MegaCHOEP + 6 × R (p = 0.050). After a median observation time of 29 months the estimated 3-year overall survival was 83.8 % after 8 × CHOEP – 14 + 6 × R and 75.3 % after MegaCHOEP + 6 × R (p = 0.142). Progression – free survival was 76.0 % after 8 × CHOEP – 14 + 6 × R and 64.6 % after MegaCHOEP + 6 × R (p = 0.119). A comparison of the rituximab-containing treatment arms (8 × CHOEP 14 + 6 × R and Mega CHOEP + 6 × R) with the chemotherapy – only arms (8 × CHOEP -14 and MegaCHOEP) revealed a 27.1 % difference in the 3-year EFS-rate ( p = 0.003 ) pointing to the unexpectedly high efficacy of R particularly in untreated, young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-NHL. These data were presented to the members of the study group and the data safety and monitoring committee who decided to stop the MegaCHOEP arm of the study. In conclusion, 8 × CHOEP -14 + 6 × R gave excellent results in young, high-risk patients with untreated aggressive B cell lymphoma. The 3-year EFS and OS are the best ever reported for this group of patients. MegaCHOEP + 6 × R was no better than aggressive conventional chemotherapy regarding any of the study endpoints; EFS (primary endpoint of the study) was significantly worse. Because of higher toxicity and inferior survival the MegaCHOEP arm was discontinued. HDT / ASCT has no role to play as part of first-line therapy for patients with high-risk aggressive B cell lymphoma if rituximab is combined with aggressive conventional chemotherapy. Disclosures: Schmitz: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nickelsen:Roche: Honoraria. Trümper:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pfreundschuh:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Glass:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Discrepancy of CD20 Protein Expression In IHC and FCM Analyses In Primary B-Cell Lymphoma: Relationship Between FCM-Negative Phenotype and Rituximab Binding with Lymphoma Cells

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5087-5087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Tokunaga ◽  
Akihiro Tomita ◽  
Kazuyuki Shimada ◽  
Junji Hiraga ◽  
Takumi Sugimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Lymphoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Lymphoma Cells ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 5087 Background Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric-monoclonal antibody, and its effectiveness for treatment of CD20-positive B-cell lymphomas has been proven over the past 10 years. Although rituximab is now a key molecular targeting drug for CD20-positive lymphomas, some patients with rituximab resistance have emerged. We previously reported that the CD20-protein-negative phenotypic change after using rituximab is one of the critical mechanisms in rituximab resistance (Hiraga J, Tomita A, et al., Blood, 2009., Sugimoto T, Tomita A, et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009.). Recently, we have recognized that some newly-diagnosed B-cell lymphomas show CD20-protein-positive in immunohistochemistry (IHC) but -negative in flow cytometry (FCM) analyses. For these patients, so far, neither the molecular mechanisms of CD20 IHC(+)/FCM(−) phenotype, nor the relationship between this phenotype and rituximab resistance are clear. Thus, the clinical significance of introducing rituximab therapy for these patients must be elucidated. Aims Analyses of the molecular backgrounds of CD20 IHC(+)/FCM(−) phenotype in primary B-lymphoma cells, and confirmation of the effectiveness of rituximab therapy for the patients who show CD20 IHC(+)/FCM(−) phenotype. Results Primary B-cell lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), follicular, MALT, mantle cell, and Burkitt) tissues and cells were analyzed by IHC and FCM. Four newly-diagnosed B-cell lymphoma patients showed IHC CD79(+)/CD20(+) and FCM CD19(+)/CD20(−) phenotype using anti-CD20 antibodies L26 for IHC and B1 for FCM, and all were diagnosed as DLBCL. Chromosomal analysis showed complex karyotypes in 3 out of 3 patients analyzed, and no shared abnormalities were confirmed. Primary lymphoma cells from 3 patients were available for further molecular analyses, and the genomic DNA, the total RNA, and the protein from whole cell lysate were obtained from these lymphoma cells. DNA sequencing analysis indicated no significant genetic mutations on the coding sequences (CDS) of MS4A1 (CD20) gene. Semi-quantitative and quantitative RT-PCR indicated that CD20 mRNA expression was almost normal in 2 patients and ≂~f10 times lower in 1 patient compared to the positive control B-lymphoma/leukemia cells. Almost the same expression tendency with RT-PCR was confirmed in immunoblot analysis using whole cell lysate and the two different anti-CD20 antibodies. The molecular weight of the CD20 protein in immunoblotting corresponded to the wild type in these patients. Rituximab binding assay in vitro was performed using primary lymphoma cells from a patient and the fluorescent-labeled rituximab (Alexa488-rituximab). Interestingly, rituximab binding on the surface of the CD19 positive lymphoma cells was confirmed in vitro. Rituximab containing combination chemotherapy was performed, resulting in complete response in all 4 cases after completing 4 to 8 courses. Conclusions and Discussion CD20 IHC(+)/FCM(−) phenotype was confirmed in newly-diagnosed DLBCL patients. Significant abnormalities in CD20 protein and mRNA expression in immunoblotting and RT-PCR were not confirmed, and genetic mutations on CDS of MS4A1 gene, resulting in the conformation change of CD20 protein, were not detected. The possibility of abnormal post-translational modification or aberrant localization of CD20 protein, leading to interference with antibody binding, can not be excluded. Rituximab binding with CD19-positive primary lymphoma cells was confirmed in a patient, suggesting that CD20 IHC(+)/FCM(-) phenotype does not directly indicate the ineffectiveness of rituximab for these cells. Further investigations, performing in vitro CDC and ADCC assay using primary lymphoma cells, are still warranted to show rituximab effectiveness and sensitivity to those cells. Disclosures: Kinoshita: Zenyaku Kogyo Co.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Naoe:Zenyaku Kogyo Co.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding.

Integration of Rituximab and Liposomal Doxorubicin (DOXIL®) Into CODOX-M/IVAC for HIV-Negative and HIV+ Adults with Untreated Burkitt's Lymphoma (BL): Results of a Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2669-2669
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Kenneth R. Carson ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Borko Jovanovic ◽  
Paul Barr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Burkitt’S Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Hiv Negative

Abstract Abstract 2669 Background: The survival of adult BL has improved with intensification of multi-agent chemotherapy, although 2-year survival rates remain <65–70%. Efforts to improve survival, as well as decrease treatment-related toxicities are needed. Further, there are no prospective clinical studies to date that have examined the addition of rituximab into the CODOX-M/IVAC regimen. Methods: Eligible patients for this investigator-initiated, 5-site phase II clinical trial included: newly diagnosed BL and B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and BL (according to WHO 2008 definition) regardless of HIV status. Eligibility for HIV+ patients included: no evidence of multi-drug resistant HIV infection or concurrent AIDS defining illness and CD4 count >350/mcL. Patients were classified as low risk (LR) if they had all of the following factors present: 1) normal LDH, 2) stage I/II disease, 3) ECOG performance status (PS) <2, and 4) no mass >10 cm. All other patients were “high risk” (HR). LR patients received 3 consecutive cycles of CODOX-M, while HR patients received 4 alternating cycles of CODOX-M and IVAC. For CODOX-M, methotrexate 3.0 gram/m2 i.v. was used. Further, liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) was utilized in lieu of doxorubicin (day 1 of all CODOX-M cycles), while intravenous rituximab (500 mg/m2) was added to days 0 and day 8 of each CODOX-M cycle and days 0 and 6 of IVAC cycles. In addition, as a corollary analysis, frequent assessment of ejection fraction (EF) was performed in all patients (baseline, s/p 2 cycles, and 4 weeks after completion of therapy). Results: Twenty-five patients (22 male and 3 female) enrolled from March 2007 through April 2011. The median age was 44 years (range, 23–70 years). Furthermore, 5 (20%) patients were >60 years. All patients had classical BL, while 1 patient had concomitant BCL-2 expression. There were 20 HR and 5 LR patients; 3 of the HR and 1 LR patient were HIV+, while the remaining patients were HIV-negative. Median PS at study entry was 1, while PS=2 in 6 (24%) patients. Further, 3 (15%) HR patients had + central nervous system disease (2 parenchymal, 1 leptomeningeal). Additionally, 7 (35%) HR patients had bulky disease >10 cm (2 (10%) with dominant mass >20cm), 8 (40%) of all patients had bone marrow involvement, and 15 (75%) had an elevated LDH. 24 of 25 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response/survival. Therapy was completed at a median of 13.5 weeks (range, 11–20) for HR patients and a median of 10 weeks for LR (range, 9–12). With respect to toxicity, myelosuppression was overall comparable (58% of patients experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia with only 4% grade 4 anemia) to prior CODOX-M/IVAC data, while the incidence of mucositis also appeared similar to prior reports (38% grade 3, 13% grade 4). Other clinically relevant grade 3 toxicities included neutropenic fever (33%), transaminitis (33%), diarrhea (8%), elevated creatinine (8%), and seizure (4%). Notably, there was no grade 3 or 4 neuropathy. After 2 cycles of therapy, two grade 2 and two grade 3 cardiac events were noted (all depressed EF, no clinical evidence of congestive heart failure). The two grade 3 events occurred in a 70-year-old and 69-year-old man, both with HR disease, and the latter with history of myocardial infarction. Among all patients, the median change in EF at baseline vs study end was: −2% (range, −22% to +11%). In terms of outcomes, the response rate after 2 cycles of therapy was 100% with a 67% complete remission (CR) rate. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year PFS and OS rates for all patients were 86% and 86%, respectively (LR 2-year PFS and OS both 100%; and HR 2-year PFS and OS both 82%). Furthermore, the 2-year PFS and OS rates for HR, HIV-negative patients were 91% and 91%, respectively (see Figure 1), while the disease-specific survival (DSS) for this subgroup of patients was 100%. Of the 3 deaths on trial, 2 were due to progressive disease in HIV+ HR patients, while the 3rd was a 71 year-old HIV-negative HR subject who died in CR at 14 months from unknown causes. Conclusions: Altogether, the integration of rituximab and liposomal doxorubicin into CODOX-M/IVAC for adult BL was feasible and associated with similar tolerability compared with prior reports. Additionally, this regimen was associated with excellent survival rates, especially for HIV-negative BL. Disclosures: Evens: Ortho-Biotec: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Doxil in the treatment of Burkitt's lymphoma. Carson:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Nabhan:Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gregory:Genentech: Advisory Board. Gordon:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Differential Patterns of Gene Expression and CD20 Localisation by the Type II Anti-CD20 Antibody Obinutuzumab (GA101) Compared with the Type I Antibody Rituximab Suggests Binding to Functionally Distinct CD20 Subpopulations on B-Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3721-3721
Author(s):  
Gerhard Niederfellner ◽  
Olaf Mundigl ◽  
Alexander Lifke ◽  
Andreas Franke ◽  
Ute Baer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Cd20 Antibody ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 3721 The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has become central to the treatment of B-cell malignancies over the last decade. Recently, it has been shown that anti-CD20 antibodies can be divided into two types based on their mechanisms of action on B cells. Rituximab is a type I antibody that redistributes CD20 into lipid rafts and promotes complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), while the type II, glycoengineered antibody GA101 has lower CDC activity but higher antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and direct cell death activity. In preclinical studies GA101 was superior to rituximab in B-cell killing in vitro, depletion of B cells from whole blood, and inhibition of tumour cell growth in lymphoma xenograft models. GA101 is currently being evaluated in Phase II/III trials, including comparative studies with rituximab. To investigate the differences in direct effects of GA101 and rituximab on B-cell lymphoma signaling, we have analysed the effects of antibody binding on gene expression in different B-cell lines using a GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix). Rituximab and GA101 rapidly induced gene expression changes in SUDHL4 and Z138 cells, including regulation of genes associated with B-cell-receptor activation such as EGR2, BCL2A1, RGS1 and NAB2. The effects on gene expression differed markedly between different cell lines and between the two antibodies. SUDHL4 cells showed pronounced changes in the gene expression pattern to rituximab treatment, while Z138 cells, which represent a different B-cell stage, showed less pronounced changes in gene expression. The reverse was true for GA101, suggesting not only that the signaling mediated by CD20 differs in different cell lines, but also that in a given cell line the two types of antibodies bind CD20 molecules with different signaling capacity. For each cell line, gene expression induced by other type I antibodies (LT20, 2H7, MEM97) was more like rituximab and that induced by other type II antibodies (H299/B1, BH20) was more like GA101 in terms of the number of genes regulated and the magnitude of changes in expression. Unbiased hierarchical clustering analysis of gene expression in SUDHL4 could discriminate type I from type II antibodies, confirming that the two classes of antibody recognised CD20 complexes with inherently different signalling capacities. By confocal and time-lapse microscopy using different fluorophores, rituximab and GA101 localised to different compartments on the membrane of lymphoma cells. GA101/CD20 complexes were relatively static and predominantly associated with sites of cell–cell contact, while rituximab/CD20 complexes were highly dynamic and predominantly outside areas of contact. These findings suggest that type II antibodies such as GA101 bind distinct subpopulations of CD20 compared with type I antibodies such as rituximab, accounting for the differences in mechanisms of action and anti-tumour activity between these antibodies. Disclosures: Niederfellner: Roche: Employment. Mundigl:Roche: Employment. Lifke:Roche: Employment. Franke:Roche: Employment. Baer:Roche: Employment. Burtscher:Roche: Employment. Maisel:Roche: Employment. Belousov:Roche: Employment. Weidner:Roche: Employment. Umana:Roche: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Klein:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Results of a Phase II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab for the Treatment of Indolent Non Follicular Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1645-1645
Author(s):  
Stefano Sacchi ◽  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
Marina Cesaretti ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
Eliana Valentina Liardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Small Series

Abstract Abstract 1645 Background: Indolent non follicular B-Cell Lymphomas (INFL) are an eterogenous group of lymphomas and include small lymphocityic lymphoma (SLL), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Relapsed INFLs in advanced stage have a relatively poor prognosis, with low complete response to conventional chemotherapy and short survival. Lenalidomide (R®) is an immunomodulatory drug with effects on the innate immune system that may enhance antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity as well as the development of specific anti-tumor immune responses. These immunologic effects may synergize with the action of rituximab (R). To test the efficacy of R® combined with R (R2), we have conducted a multi center, open label phase II clinical trial in patients (pts) with relapsed INFL. Methods: Eligible pts must have indolent non follicular B-cell lymphoma relapsed after at least 2 but less than 4 prior lines of R-containing immuno-chemotherapy with measurable disease. Patients received oral R® 20 mg once daily on days 1–21. R is administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 at day 14 of every course. Treatment is repeated every 28 days for up to 6 courses. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the antitumor activity of oral R® when given in combination with R and to assess the safety of R2 evaluated by standard criteria (CTC-NCI 3.0). The secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS) and duration of remission (DR). Results: From July 2010 and June 2012, 39 patients were enrolled: 19 had SLL, 11 had LPL, 4 splenic MZL, 3 extranodal MZL and a 2 nodal MZL. Median age was 68 years (51–76) and 58% were male. LDH value was increased in 17% of pts and β-2-microglobulin in 87%; 41% of pts had Hb<12 g/dL and 62% were bone marrow positive. At time of current analysis treatment and response data were available in 27 pts. Overall treatment was completed in 18 pts (67%); in 9 cases treatment was interrupted prematurely primarily due to hematological toxicity (n=5) and due to disease progression (n=4). Of the 27 pts, 5 achieved a complete remission and 9 a partial remission with an ORR of 52%. In general, the regimen R2 was relatively well-tolerated. Grade 3–4 hematological events included neutropenia occurring in 50% of pts, infection in 7% and piastrinopenia in 3%. Growth factors were administered in 60% of pts. The median dose intensity was 0.94 for R and 0.92 for R®. With a median follow-up of 13 months (range 1–36), overall 9 pts had a lymphoma progression and 2 of them died. The 1-year overall survival and the 1-year PFS were 92% (IC95% 57–99%) and 78 months (IC95% 54–91%) respectively. Conclusions: In our trial follicular histology was an exclusion criteria and all pts were relapsed/refractory to immuno-chemotherapy rituximab-containing regimens. Thus the results observed with the chemo-free R2 scheme compare favorably with other previously reported results observed in relapsed indolent lymphoma treated with standard immuno-chenotherapy. Further the R2 combination was relatively well tolerated. In conclusion our results, although obtained in a small series of patient are encouraging and support further evaluation of R2 scheme in a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Safety and Clinical Activity of Temsirolimus in Combination with Rituximab and DHAP in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma - Results of the Part I Cohort of the STORM Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2727-2727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Witzens-Harig ◽  
Ulrich Keller ◽  
Andreas Viardot ◽  
Christian Buske ◽  
Anne Crombé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Salvage Regimen

Abstract Purpose. To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus and a standard salvage regimen (R-DHAP) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods. This is a prospective, multicenter, phase II, open-label study. Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL with a maximum of two prior treatment lines were eligible. The STORM regimen consisted of Rituximab 375 mg/m² (day 2) and DHAP (Dexamethasone 40mg day 3-6, Cisplatine 100 mg/m² day 3, Cytarabine 2x2 g/m² day 4) with Temsirolimus added on day 1 and 8 of a 21 d cycle, with 2-4 cycles planned. In part I, dose levels for the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus from 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg were predefined. Results. Here we report on the preliminary results of part I of this clinical trial. 15 patients were included - 8 patients in the 25 mg cohort and 7 patients in the 50 mg cohort. Median age was 70 (range 49-76) years and median number of prior regimen was 1. Two DLTs (one venous thrombosis in the 25 mg cohort, one esophagus infection in the 50 mg cohort) were observed. The most frequent non-hematologic side effects were nausea (9 pts, 60%), epistaxis (7 pts, 47%), fatigue (6 pts, 40%), increased ALT (6 pts, 40%) and increased creatinine (6 pts, 40%). Frequent grade 3/4 events (n>2) in both cohorts (25mg|50mg) included leukopenia (11 pts, 73% - with a mean duration of 4.4 days | 6.7 days ), thrombocytopenia (11 pts, 73% - with a mean duration of 4.6 days | 11.9 days), lymphopenia (6pts, 40%), anemia (5 pts, 33%), neutropenia (3 pts, 20%), renal failure (3 pts, 20%) and infections (4 pts, 27%, bladder infection, esophagus infection, central venous access infection, soft tissue infection, mucositis). Based on the observed toxicity profile, the independent data safety committee recommended a Temsirolimus dose of 25 mg given on day 1 and 8 for the part II extension cohort of the trial. All but one evaluable patient responded (10/11 pts, 91%), with two CRs and one CRu (27%). Four patients could not be evaluated for response at the time of this report. After a median follow up of 12 (range 5-22) months, no relapse has been documented so far (1 pt lost to follow up). Conclusion. Temsirolimus can be safely added to DHAP and Rituximab with promising activity. Recruitment into part II is ongoing and updated results will be presented. Disclosures Witzens-Harig: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Keller:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Viardot:Roche: Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Buske:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Ho:Sanofi: Research Funding. Hess:Janssen, Roche, Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Tandem HD-chemotherapy and myeloablative radioimmunotherapy with 131I-anti-CD20 rituximab in relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphoma: Results of a phase II study of the German RAIT Study Group

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13007-13007 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hohloch ◽  
G. Wulf ◽  
W. Jung ◽  
E. Stitz ◽  
J. Meller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
B Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Anti Cd20

13007 Background: Radioimmunotherapy has been shown to be effective in CD20 + B-cell lymphomas. Both non-myeloablative as well as myeloablative regimens have been employed for low grade and high grade lymphomas with impressive response rates and remission durations. Recently, the Press group and our group published data on myeloablative 131-I-anti-CD20 RAIT with high response rates and favourable long term survival especially in follicular lymphomas and transformed FL. Therefore, a phase II study is currently being done within the German Radioimmunotherapy Group, interim analysis data are presented. Methods: Patients were to receive R-Dexa-BEAM, followed by BEAM and HD-RAIT 2–6 months after BEAM. 131-I-Rituximab was administered with a maximum kidney and lung dose of 25 Gy. Sample size was calculated to be 16 to evaluate toxicity and feasibility of the tandem approach as primary endpoint. Results: 16 pts with relapsed (14) or primary refractory (2) B-cell lymphomas (FLI,II: 4pts; DLBCL: 4pts (all early relapses); transformed FL: 6 pts; MCL:1 pt, marginal zone lymphoma: 1 pt) were treated with 1 (15 pts) or 2 cycles (1 pt) of R-Dexa-BEAM. 13/16 pts achieving PR (5) or CRu (8) were treated with BEAM, 2 pts with PD and 1 with subdural hematoma were drop outs. After BEAM, 9/13 pts were in CR, 3/13 PR, 1/13 PD. Of 12 responding pts, 6 received HD-RAIT (1 pancytopenia, 1 hepatic, 2 pulmonary toxicity, 3 too early). After HD RAIT, 5/6 pts were in CR, 1 in PR. 4/6 pts (3 CR, 1 PR) are alive for 22–31 months, 2 pts died in CR, 1 of interstitial lung disease 2 months after HD-RAIT, 1 pt of pneumonia 8 months after HD-RAIT. Conclusions: Myeloablative RAIT is a feasible and effective treatment modality for relapsed poor prognosis CD20+ B-NHL not having severe toxicity due to the salvage regimen and HD-chemotherapy. HD RAIT offers the potential for long term relapse free survival. Final analysis of toxicity and outcome of this phase II study will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document