Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Perfusion ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J DeBois ◽  
Junli Liu ◽  
Leonard Y Lee ◽  
Leonard N Girardi ◽  
Charles Mack ◽  
...  

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. CMBD.S5118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Saugel ◽  
Roland M. Schmid ◽  
Wolfgang Huber

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse reaction to heparin therapy that is characterized by thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. According to guidelines, in patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT all sources of heparin have to be discontinued and an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant for HIT treatment must immediately be started. For both the prophylaxis of thrombembolic events in HIT and the treatment of HIT with thrombosis the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban is approved in the United States. The objective of this review is to describe the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic profile of argatroban, to characterize argatroban regarding its safety and therapeutic efficacy and to discuss its place in therapy in HIT.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3925-3925
Author(s):  
N. Mullai ◽  
Amanda Brock ◽  
Shona Harper

Abstract Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a known complication of heparin therapy. This study was planned to assess the experience of a community based medical practice with HIT in a rural setting. Method: A retrospective study was done from medical records of patients suspected clinically of HIT from January 2006 to January 2007. The data were analyzed with regard to test results of patients, especially those who were positive for the HIT antibody and correlated with national statistics. Result: Fifty-two (52) patients were suspected clinically of having HIT during the study period. All 52 patients received heparin and most of them had cardiac surgery before the onset of thrombocytopenia. Six out of fifty-two (6/52) patients were found to have positive HIT antibody. Two out of six (2/6) also had positive serotonin release assay. Two out of six (2/6) developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT). One of the two patients with HITT died of complications. The range of time to obtain test results was 5–7 days. Four out of fifty-two (4/52) patients received thrombin inhibitor lepirudin (Refludan) as alternate anticoagulation. Conclusion: The overall incidences, time of onset, relation to heparin treatment were similar to that of national averages. The time to obtain diagnostic test results ranged 5–7 days and heparin was withheld in all of them, and more expensive anticoagulation was used for some of them while waiting for the test results. This dilemma in diagnosis and treatment could be avoided if a rapid test that can help to assess the risk early in about 12–24 hrs, is possible. Such a test would be very beneficial especially in small, rural community settings where the availability of expensive testing and medications for HIT are limited.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Francis ◽  
Alane Drexler ◽  
Gage Gwyn ◽  
Rebecca Moroose

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin therapy. As thrombosis occurs in 50% of untreated patients, prompt treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) is recommended. Lepirudin and argatroban are currently approved for the treatment of HIT. However, their use is complicated by antibody formation with potential for anaphylactic shock (lepirudin), effects on the PT/INR that complicate transition to coumadin (argatroban), and significant dose adjustments in patients with renal (lepirudin) or liver (argatroban) impairment. The effectiveness of bivalirudin, another DTI, as a replacement for heparin has been well documented in percutaneous coronary intervention, but there are little published data on its use in treating HIT. We now report our experience with bivalirudin in 52 patients with clinical suspicion of HIT, or at increased risk of this complication. HIT was suspected on the basis of a falling platelet count and/or thrombosis in the setting of current or recent heparin therapy (n=49). Patients were considered at increased risk of HIT if they required ongoing intravenous anticoagulation in a setting associated with a high incidence of heparin-platelet factor 4 (HPF4) antibodies (n=3). Data were collected by retrospective chart review, and patients classified according to whether HIT was very likely (n=13), likely (n=17), unlikely (n=11) or very unlikely (n=11). Bivalirudin was given by intravenous infusion, typically at an initial dose of 0.15 - 0.20 mg/kg/h and adjusted to achieve an APTT of approximately 1.5–2.5 x baseline. Twenty-one patients had moderate or severe renal impairment. The infusion rate was significantly lower for patients with severe renal insufficiency, but was not different in those with mild renal dysfunction. ELISA-detectable HPF4 antibodies were present in 43/52 cases. Twenty-seven patients were significantly thrombocytopenic (<100,000 x 109/L) and 22 had thrombosis before therapy. Transition to warfarin was achieved in 44/52 patients with a median overlap of therapy of 4 (0.5–14) days. Bivalirudin therapy was continued for an average of 8.0 (3–47) days, and had a relatively minor impact on the PT/INR. The mean INR on monotherapy was 1.50 (1.23–2.18) with a mean change in INR due to bivalirudin therapy of 0.33 ± 0.22. Therapeutic APTTs were achieved in all patients, with approximately 92.5% of tests in the desired range. The average time to platelet recovery was 3.0 (1–10) days. There were no cases of major bleeding, no deaths attributable to HIT, and no patient required amputation. We conclude that bivalirudin provides safe and effective anticoagulation for patients with suspected HIT, as well as for those with an increased risk of HIT that require intravenous anticoagulation. Potential advantages of bivalirudin include the relatively minor effect on the PT, which facilitates transition to warfarin therapy, and its short half-life in patients at high risk of bleeding or who require invasive procedures at short notice.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4819-4819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouyan Gohari ◽  
Philip Rubin

Treatment of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requires the use of alternatives anticoagulants, such as a direct thrombin inhibitor – argatroban. Use of argatroban relies on frequent laboratory monitoring of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to maintain an adequate level of anticoagulation. This requirement poses a challenge in patients with prolonged baseline aPTT, such as in antiphospholipid syndrome. While other assays are being explored they require an extended turn around time because of their limited availability. We present a case of a 63 year old male with a history of antiphospholipid syndrome, end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, hepatitis C, and on long term anticoagulation with warfarin for cerebral vein thrombosis. His hospital course required transition to unfractionated heparin and subsequently developed thrombocytopenia. A heparin-platelet factor 4 ELISA antibody assay was performed for an intermediate clinical likelihood of HIT and returned positive. Although not confirmed with the gold standard serotonin release assay (SRA), clinical suspicion for HIT obligated treatment with an alternative anticoagulant. Conventional dosing and administration of argatroban however could not be performed because of the patient’s prolonged baseline aPTT. Other agents such as fondaparinux were also not possible in the setting of renal insufficiency. Short of other treatment techniques accepted in this unique set of circumstances we practiced a fixed dose argatroban (0.5 mcg/kg/min for Child’s class B cirrhosis). The patient tolerated the empiric dosing well until discontinued because of a negative SRA. This case demonstrates the limitations of current treatment recommendations of HIT and need for further investigation in similar patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2757-2757
Author(s):  
Ishac Nazi ◽  
Donald M Arnold ◽  
James W Smith ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin ◽  
Jane C Moore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common drug reaction that causes arterial or venous thrombosis as a result of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating antibodies, against complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, cause intense platelet activation, ultimately leading to an increased risk of thrombosis, limb-loss and even death. Most patients exposed to heparin will produce non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies while only a small number will produce platelet-activating and HIT-causing antibodies (pathogenic HIT antibodies). Among HIT tests, the functional assays, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA), correlate best with the disease because they can specifically identify the pathogenic HIT antibodies whereas the enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) cannot. We have previously shown that anti-PF4/heparin antibody production precedes thrombocytopenia in HIT patients (Warkentin et al., Blood 2009 113: 4963-4969) possibly indicating the need for a threshold plasma level of pathogenic HIT antibody, among other factors, to cause the disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of low levels of pathogenic HIT antibodies in samples from patients suspected of HIT who had detectable anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in the EIA (EIA-positive), but who did not have platelet-activating antibodies in the standard SRA (SRA-negative). Methods: We used an in-house IgG-specific EIA to detect the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (EIA-positive: OD405nm> 0.45) and the standard SRA to detect the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies (SRA-positive: release >20% with 0.1-0.3 IU/mL of unfractionated heparin). We developed an enhanced SRA (eSRA) by adding increasing concentrations of exogenous PF4 (0-100 μg/mL) to detect sub-threshold levels of platelet activating antibodies undetectable in the standard SRA (eSRA-positive: release >20%). Samples tested were referred for HIT testing by the McMaster Platelet Immunology Laboratory (Hamilton, Canada). Results: Sera from healthy individuals (n=10) and from suspected HIT patients with a negative anti-PF4/heparin EIA (n=15) did not demonstrate platelet activation in the eSRA at any dose of exogenous PF4 added. SRA-positive sera (n = 7), diluted sufficiently that they were non-reactive in the standard SRA, demonstrated PF4 dose-dependent platelet activation in the eSRA. This confirmed the increased sensitivity of the eSRA in detecting low-titre platelet-activating antibodies. Reactivity in the eSRA was inhibited by high heparin (100 U/mL) and by blocking the platelet FcgRIIa receptor with the monoclonal antibody IV.3. We then tested samples (n=24) referred for HIT testing that were positive in the anti-PF4/heparin EIA (optical densities OD405nm 0.7 to 2.4) but negative in the standard SRA. Heparin-dependent platelet activation (20-99% release) was demonstrated in 11 of 24 (46%) in the eSRA. This reactivity directly correlated with the amount of PF4 added to the platelets (optimal concentration of PF4 12.5 - 100 μg/mL) but not with the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. In further investigations, we concentrated (4-fold) 7 of the 11 eSRA-positive samples in an attempt to increase the concentration of the antibodies. Of those 7 samples, 5 (71%) became positive in the standard SRA upon testing of the concentrated sample. Conclusions: These data indicate that low-titre platelet-activating antibodies may be found in some patients suspected of having HIT that test negative in the standard SRA irrespective of the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. The immune response during heparin therapy can produce both families of pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but it is the titre of the pathogenic antibody that may be necessary for platelet activation. Perhaps under permissive clinical conditions and with patient-specific factors, the titre of the pathogenic HIT antibodies may increase and lead to HIT. Disclosures Warkentin: Pfizer Canada: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; W.L. Gore: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (21) ◽  
pp. 2864-2872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gowthami M. Arepally

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune complication of heparin therapy caused by antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Pathogenic antibodies to PF4/heparin bind and activate cellular FcγRIIA on platelets and monocytes to propagate a hypercoagulable state culminating in life-threatening thrombosis. It is now recognized that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies develop commonly after heparin exposure, but only a subset of sensitized patients progress to life-threatening complications of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Recent scientific developments have clarified mechanisms underlying PF4/heparin immunogenicity, disease susceptibility, and clinical manifestations of disease. Insights from clinical and laboratory findings have also been recently harnessed for disease prevention. This review will summarize our current understanding of HIT by reviewing pathogenesis, essential clinical and laboratory features, and management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glosser LD ◽  
◽  
Knauss HM ◽  
Jodeh W ◽  
Craig D ◽  
...  

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic and potentially fatal immune complication of heparin therapy. HIT is challenging to diagnose, particularly in critically ill patients where multiple causes of thrombocytopenia must be considered. Diagnostic algorithms for HIT begin with a clinical assessment, followed by laboratory testing when indicated. If Platelet Factor-4 (PF4)/heparin immunoassay and Serotonin Release Assays (SRA) are negative, HIT is deemed unlikely and heparin therapy may be resumed. Current recommendations have excluded the next step in work up for thrombocytopenia after immunoassay and functional assays result negative despite worsening thrombocytopenia following heparin re-initiation. We present the case of an 85-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, found to have a clinical course consistent with HIT despite negative serologic and functional assay results. Our case highlights the challenge in diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a medically complex patient and demonstrates the need for standardized recommendations following negative laboratory results despite high clinical suspicion.


1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (04) ◽  
pp. 344-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
B H Chong ◽  
J Burgess ◽  
F Ismail

SummaryThe platelet aggregation test is widely used for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a potentially serious complication of heparin therapy. We have evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in comparison with those of the 14C-serotonin release test. The sensitivity of the platelet aggregation test was found to vary with the heparin concentration and the donor of the platelets used in the test. The optimal heparin concentrations were between 0.1 and 1.0 U/ml. Using these heparin concentrations, the mean sensitivity varied from 39% (with the least reactive platelets) to 81% (with the most reactive platelets). In comparison, the sensitivity of the release test ranged from 65% to 94%. The specificities of the platelet aggregation test were 82%, 90% and 100% for the following control groups: (1) non-thrombocytopenic patients given heparin, (2) patients with thrombocytopenia due to other causes, and (3) normal controls not given heparin, respectively. The corresponding specificities for the release test was 94%, 90% and 100%. The specificities can be further increased to 100% for all controls with the adoption of a two-point system which defines a positive result as one in which platelet aggregation occurs with a low heparin concentration (0.5 U/ml) but not with 100 U heparin/ml. For optimal results, a two-point platelet aggregation test should be performed with heparin concentrations of 0.5 and 100 U/ml and using platelets of more reactive donors.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 128-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.E. Lewis ◽  
W. P. Jeske ◽  
F. Leya ◽  
Diane Wallis ◽  
M. Bakhos ◽  
...  

SummaryDespite the use of potent anticoagulants such as r-hirudin and argatroban, the morbidity and mortality in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) patients remains unacceptable. Data from our in vitro investigations show that thrombin inhibitors do not block platelet activation induced by heparin antibodies and heparin but that GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors do block this process. We have treated four HIT positive patients with a combined therapy of thrombin inhibitor and GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor when treatment with thrombin inhibitor alone failed to alleviate acute thrombosis. Combination therapies included r-hirudin (Refludan®) with tirofiban (Aggrastat®) and argatroban (Novastan®) with abciximab (ReoPro®). A reduced dose of the thrombin inhibitor was used with the standard dose of the anti-platelet drug. In all cases, there was no overt bleeding which required intervention, and all patients exhibited clinical improvement or full recovery. These case studies suggest that treatment of active thrombosis in HIT patients with adjunct GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor therapy may be more effective than thrombin inhibitor treatment alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document