Clinical characteristics and 3-month outcomes in cancer patients with incidental versus clinically-suspected and confirmed pulmonary embolism

2020 ◽  
pp. 2002723
Author(s):  
Marisa Peris ◽  
Juan J. López-Nuñez ◽  
Ana Maestre ◽  
David Jimenez ◽  
Alfonso Muriel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Incidental Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Related Mortality

BackgroundCurrent guidelines suggest treating cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism (PE) similar to those with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE. However, the natural history of these presentations has not been thoroughly compared.MethodsWe used the data from the RIETE registry to compare the 3-month outcomes in patients with active cancer and incidental PE versus those with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were PE-related mortality, symptomatic PE recurrences and major bleeding.ResultsFrom July 2012 to January 2019, 946 cancer patients with incidental asymptomatic PE and 2274 with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE were enrolled. Most patients (95% versus 90%) received low-molecular-weight heparin therapy. During the first 90 days, 598 patients died, including 42 from PE. Patients with incidental PE had a lower all-cause mortality rate than those with suspected and confirmed PE (11% versus 22%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95%CI: 0.34–0.54). Results were consistent for PE-related mortality (0.3% versus 1.7%; OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06–0.59). Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with incidental PE were at lower risk to die (adjusted OR: 0.43; 95%CI: 0.34–0.56). Overall, 29 patients (0.9%) developed symptomatic PE recurrences, and 122 (3.8%) had major bleeding. There were no significant differences in PE recurrences (OR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.25–1.54) or major bleeding (OR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.51–1.18).ConclusionsCancer patients with incidental PE had a lower mortality rate than those with clinically-suspected and confirmed PE. Further studies are required to validate these findings, and to explore optimal management strategies in these patients.

scholarly journals Outcome during and after anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients with incidentally found pulmonary embolism

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1360-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa Peris ◽  
David Jiménez ◽  
Ana Maestre ◽  
Carme Font ◽  
Alfonso J. Tafur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Benefit Ratio ◽  
Incidental Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Fatal Bleeding ◽  
Current Guidelines

Current guidelines suggest treating cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism comparably to patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism.We used the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry to compare the rate of major bleeding and symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the course of anticoagulation and after its discontinuation in cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism.As of March 2016, 715 cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism had been enrolled in RIETE. During the course of anticoagulant therapy (mean 235 days), the rate of major bleeding was higher than the rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (10.1 (95% CI 7.48–13.4) versus 3.17 (95% CI 1.80–5.19) events per 100 patient–years, respectively), and the rate of fatal bleeding was higher than the rate of fatal pulmonary embolism (2.66 (95% CI 1.44–4.52) versus 0.66 (95% CI 0.17–1.81) deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively). After discontinuing anticoagulation (mean follow-up 117 days), the rate of major bleeding was lower than the rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (3.00 (95% CI 1.10–6.65) versus 8.37 (95% CI 4.76–13.7) events per 100 patient-years, respectively); however, there were no differences in the rate of fatal events at one death each.The risk/benefit ratio of anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism is uncertain and must be evaluated in further studies.

scholarly journals Management appropriateness and outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1800445 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Jiménez ◽  
Behnood Bikdeli ◽  
Deisy Barrios ◽  
Raquel Morillo ◽  
Rosa Nieto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Vena Cava Filters ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Related Mortality

The impact of adherence to published guidelines on the outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been well defined by previous studies.In this prospective cohort study of patients admitted to a respiratory department (n=2096), we evaluated whether patients with PE had better outcomes if they were acutely managed according to international guidelines. Outcomes consisted of all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding events during the first month of follow-up after diagnosis.Overall, 408 patients (19% (95% CI 18–21%)) did not receive guideline-adherent PE management. Patients receiving non-adherent management were significantly more likely to experience all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.39 (95% CI 1.57–3.61) or PE-related mortality (adjusted OR 5.02 (95% CI 2.42–10.42); p<0.001) during follow-up. Non-adherent management was also a significant independent predictor of recurrent VTE (OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.11–4.32); p=0.03) and major bleeding (OR 2.65 (95% CI 1.66–4.24); p<0.001). An external validation cohort of 34 380 patients with PE from the RIETE registry confirmed these findings.PE management that does not adhere to guidelines for indications related to anticoagulation, thrombolytics and inferior vena cava filters is associated with worse patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Right heart thrombi in pulmonary embolism

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1377-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deisy Barrios ◽  
Vladimir Rosa-Salazar ◽  
David Jiménez ◽  
Raquel Morillo ◽  
Alfonso Muriel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Oxyhaemoglobin Saturation ◽  
Related Mortality

There is a lack of comprehensive data on the prevalence, predictors and prognostic significance of right heart thrombi (RHT) in pulmonary embolism.In this study of patients with pulmonary embolism from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry, we assessed the prevalence and predictors of RHT, and the association between the presence of RHT and the outcomes of all-cause mortality, pulmonary embolism-related mortality, recurrences, and major bleeding through 30 days after initiation of pulmonary embolism treatment.Of 12 441 patients with pulmonary embolism and baseline echocardiographic data, 2.6% had RHT. The following increased the risk of RHT: younger age, previous bleeding, congestive heart failure, cancer, syncope, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, and arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation <90%. Patients with RHT were significantly more likely to die from any cause (adjusted OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.62–3.84); p<0.001) and from pulmonary embolism (adjusted OR 4.29 (95% CI 2.45–7.48); p<0.001) during follow-up. RHT was associated with an increased risk of recurrence during follow-up (1.8% versus 0.7%; p=0.04). Major bleeding was similar in patients with and without RHT.In patients presenting with pulmonary embolism, RHT is relatively infrequent. Patients with RHT had a worse outcome when compared with those without RHT.

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications following primary total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1571-1577
Author(s):  
Astrid Blicher Schelde ◽  
Janne Petersen ◽  
Thomas Bo Jensen ◽  
Kirill Gromov ◽  
Søren Overgaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Primary Total Knee

Aims The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylactic treatments in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Using nationwide medical registries, we identified patients with a primary TKA performed in Denmark between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018 who received thromboprophylactic treatment. We examined the 90-day risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and all-cause mortality following surgery. We used a Cox regression model to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome, pairwise comparing treatment with dalteparin or dabigatran with rivaroxaban as the reference. The HRs were both computed using a multivariable and a propensity score matched analysis. Results We identified 27,736 primary TKA patients who received thromboprophylactic treatment (rivaroxaban (n = 18,846); dalteparin (n = 5,767); dabigatran (n = 1,443); tinzaparin (n = 1,372); and enoxaparin (n = 308)). In the adjusted multivariable analysis and compared with rivaroxaban, treatment with dalteparin (HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.92)) or dabigatran (HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.70)) was associated with a decreased risk of VTE. No statistically significant differences were observed for major bleeding or all-cause mortality. The propensity score matched analysis yielded similar results. Conclusion Treatment with dalteparin or dabigatran was associated with a decreased 90-day risk of VTE following primary TKA surgery compared with treatment with rivaroxaban. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1571–1577.

Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (34) ◽  
pp. 5471-5489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Robenshtok ◽  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Elad Goldberg ◽  
Miriam Weinberger ◽  
Moshe Yeshurun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antifungal Prophylaxis ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Related Mortality

Purpose To evaluate the effect of antifungal prophylaxis on all-cause mortality as primary outcome, invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and adverse events. Many studies have evaluated the role of antifungal prophylaxis in cancer patients, with inconsistent conclusions. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing systemic antifungals with placebo, no intervention, or other antifungal agents for prophylaxis in cancer patients after chemotherapy. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, conference proceedings, and references were searched. Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. Results Sixty-four trials met inclusion criteria. Antifungal prophylaxis decreased all-cause mortality significantly at end of follow-up compared with placebo, no treatment, or nonsystemic antifungals (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95). In allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, prophylaxis reduced all-cause mortality (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.85), fungal-related mortality, and documented IFI. In acute leukemia patients, there was a significant reduction in fungal-related mortality and documented IFI, whereas the difference in mortality was only borderline significant (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.06). Prophylaxis with itraconazole suspension reduced documented IFI when compared with fluconazole, with no difference in survival, and at the cost of more adverse events. On the basis of two studies, posaconazole prophylaxis reduced all-cause mortality (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.98), fungal-related mortality, and IFI when compared with fluconazole. Conclusion Antifungal prophylaxis decreases all-cause mortality significantly in patients after chemotherapy. Antifungal prophylaxis should be administered to patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, and should probably be administered to high-risk acute leukemia patients.

Abstract 13030: Causes of Cardiovascular and Non-cardiovascular Mortality in the Ischemia Trial

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandeep S Sidhu ◽  
Karen P Alexander ◽  
Zhen Huang ◽  
Sean M O’Brien ◽  
Bernard R Chaitman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Management Strategies ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
International Study ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of ◽  
Multivariable Analyses ◽  
Clinical Events Committee

Background: In the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial, all-cause mortality was similar in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) randomized to invasive (INV) and conservative (CON) management strategies. This analysis details specific causes of cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV mortality by treatment group. Methods: In ISCHEMIA, 289 deaths occurred after a median follow-up of 3.2 years; 145 (5.6%) in INV and 144 (5.6%) in CON (HR 1.05, CI 0.83-1.32). Deaths were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee as CV, non-CV with or without a CV contributor or undetermined. The protocol defined CV death as deaths from CV causes, non-CV causes with CV contributor, and cause undetermined; non-CV death was defined as death from non-CV causes without a CV contributor. Multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with cause-specific death. Results: CV death was similar between groups [INV 92 (3.6%), CON 111 (4.3%); HR 0.87 (CI 0.66, 1.15)], but INV had more non-CV death [INV 53 (2.0%), CON 33 (1.3%); HR 1.63 (CI 1.06, 2.52)]; fewer undetermined deaths [INV 12 (0.5%) and CON 26 (1.0%); HR 0.48 (0.24, 0.95)] and more malignancy deaths [INV 41 (1.6%), CON 20 (0.8%); HR 2.11 (1.24, 3.61)]. In multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with CV death were age [HR 1.42 (CI 1.19-1.70) per 10-year increase], diabetes [HR 1.39 (CI 1.03-1.87)], history of heart failure [HR 1.96 (CI 1.33-2.91)], and eGFR [HR 1.18 (CI 1.11-1.26) per 5-ml/min decrease below 80ml/min]. Factors associated with non-CV death were age [HR 2.31 (CI 1.75-3.03) per 10-year increase] and randomization to INV [HR 1.76 (CI 1.13-2.75)]. Conclusions: In ISCHEMIA, all-cause mortality was similar for the INV and CON strategies. Excess non-CV deaths in INV with a higher number of deaths from malignancy but a higher number of undetermined deaths in CON requires further evaluation.

Analysis of Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Octogenarians From the ENGAGE Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 836-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibombe P. Mwipatayi ◽  
Olufemi A. Oshin ◽  
Joseph Faraj ◽  
Ramon L. Varcoe ◽  
Jackie Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Procedures ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Related Mortality

Purpose: To assess periprocedural results and secondary endovascular procedure outcomes over 5 years in patients aged ≥80 vs <80 years undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Materials and Methods: Data from the Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global post-market registry (ENGAGE) were used for the analyses. A total of 1263 consecutive patients were enrolled in the prospective, observational, single-arm registry and divided into 2 groups according to age: ≥80 years (290, 22.9%) and <80 years (973, 77.1%). Baseline patient characteristics, risk scores according to the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, quality of life assessments [EuroQol 5 (EQ5D) index], and treatment outcomes, including all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, major adverse events, secondary endovascular procedures, and endoleaks were compared between groups. Results: Octogenarians were classified into the highest category of the SVS risk stratification system; however, this did not result in a significant difference in the 30-day mortality [1.4% (4/290) vs 1.2% (12/973) for controls; p=0.85] or major adverse event rates [5.2% (15/290) vs 3.6% (35/973), p=0.23]. Multivariable analysis confirmed that age ≥80 years, pulmonary disease, large aneurysm diameter, and renal insufficiency were significantly associated with all-cause mortality, whereas diameter was the only parameter associated with increased aneurysm-related mortality. The differences in freedom from secondary endovascular procedures over 5 years between octogenarians and controls did not reach statistical significance (88.5% vs 83.2%, p=0.07). Conclusion: EVAR can be performed in individuals aged ≥80 years with no statistically significant difference in midterm aneurysm-related deaths compared with younger patients. The findings in this elderly patient cohort show that EVAR can be safely performed with acceptable morbidity rates in octogenarians.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document