scholarly journals Low socioeconomic status relates to asthma and wheeze, especially in women

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 00258-2019
Author(s):  
Christian Schyllert ◽  
Anne Lindberg ◽  
Linnea Hedman ◽  
Caroline Stridsman ◽  
Martin Andersson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Allergic Asthma ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Educational Level ◽  
Market Research ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Current Asthma ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Increased Risk

Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with asthma and wheezing. Occupational group, educational level and income are commonly used indicators for SES, but no single indicator can illustrate the entire complexity of SES. The aim was to investigate how different indicators of SES associate with current asthma, allergic and nonallergic, and asthmatic wheeze.In 2016, a random sample of the population aged 20–79 years in Northern Sweden were invited to a postal questionnaire survey, with 58% participating (n=6854). The survey data were linked to the national Integrated Database for Labour Market Research by Statistics Sweden for the previous calendar year, 2015. Included SES indicators were occupation, educational level and income.Manual workers had increased risk for asthmatic wheeze, and manual workers in service for current asthma, especially allergic asthma. Primary school education associated with nonallergic asthma, whereas it tended to be inversely associated with allergic asthma. Low income was associated with asthmatic wheeze. Overall, the findings were more prominent among women, and interaction analyses between sex and income revealed that women, but not men, with low income had an increased risk both for asthmatic wheeze and current asthma, especially allergic asthma.To summarise, the different indicators of socioeconomic status illustrated various aspects of associations between low SES and asthma and wheeze, and the most prominent associations were found among women.

Predictors of Unmet Dental Health Needs in US Adults in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 238008442110356
Author(s):  
D.J. Gaskin ◽  
H. Zare ◽  
R. McCleary ◽  
O. Kanwar ◽  
A.L. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
The United States ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Dental Visit ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Past ◽  
Dental Needs

Objective: To identify predictors of unmet dental needs for adults 18 y of age or older in the United States. Method: Using the Aday and Andersen framework and data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), we ran logistic regression to estimate predictors for adults of not having a dental visit within 5 y and having lost any teeth using a national sample of 155,060 survey respondents. Results: Results showed that predisposing factors (age, race/ethnicity, gender, and educational attainment) and enabling factors (income and health insurance status) are important predictors for losing teeth due to decay or gum disease. Men, the elderly, and less educated and low-income residents were less likely to have seen a dentist within the past 5 y and more likely to have lost their permanent teeth. Compared to non-Hispanic White adults, Hispanics adults were more likely to have had a dental visit within the past 5 y. Unmet dental needs varied across states. People living in states with extensive Medicaid dental care benefit coverage were less likely to lose their teeth and more likely to have had a dental visit within the past 5 y. Conclusion: Efforts to improve oral health should address unmet dental needs of men and adults with low socioeconomic status. Studying the variation between state oral health care programs could further our understanding of how public policy can improve population oral health. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Men, non-Hispanic Blacks, mixed and other race minorities, and low socioeconomic status adults are most at risk of unmet dental needs. States can address these needs by expanding Medicaid coverage for adults.

scholarly journals Relation of Sociodemographics and Personal Hygiene on Different Childhood Dermatoses

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
E Gauchan ◽  
A Kumar ◽  
G BK ◽  
P Thapa ◽  
J Pun
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Skin Disease ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Personal Hygiene ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Dermatology Department ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Increased Risk

Background Skin diseases in children contribute to significant morbidity and psychological distress. Infective dermatoses are one of the major dermatoses in children. Low socioeconomic status, overcrowding and poor personal hygiene has been linked to skin diseases.Objective To find out the prevalence of infectious skin disease in children, rate of transmissible skin disease and association of sociodemographic factors and personal hygiene on infective childhood dermatoses.Method This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Pediatric and Dermatology Department, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. A total of 226 patients were examined over a period of one year. Relation of sociodemographics, crowding and personal hygiene on skin disease were assessed.Result The most common category was Infections and Infestations (51.3%) followed by Dermatitis (27.9%) . Transmissible skin disease was seen in 49.6%. Low socioeconomic status and overcrowding were associated with increased risk for infective dermatoses.Conclusion Skin disease in children constitutes a public health problem. Improving the socioeconomic status and personal hygiene can help to reduce the incidence of skin disease in children.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.13(1) 2015; 29-33

Prolonged elevations in haemostatic and rheological responses following psychological stress in low socioeconomic status men and women

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (01) ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Kunz-Ebrecht ◽  
Ann Rumley ◽  
Gordon Lowe ◽  
Andrew Steptoe
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Psychological Stress ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Blood Viscosity ◽  
Stress Reactivity ◽  
Plasma Viscosity ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Increased Risk

SummaryLow socioeconomic status (SES) and psychological stress are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, and both may influence haemostatic responses. Von Willebrand factor (vWF), Factor VIII, plasma viscosity, haematocrit, blood viscosity, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and fibrin D-dimer were measured at rest and following stressful tasks in 238 middle-aged British civil servants. SES was defined by grade of employment. Lower SES was associated with higher resting vWF, Factor VIII and plasma viscosity. Psychological stress stimulated increases in haemostatic and rheological factors. Initial stress responses did not vary with SES, but Factor VIII, plasma viscosity and blood viscosity remained more elevated 45 minutes post-stress in lower SES participants. High blood pressure stress reactivity was also associated with greater haemostatic responses. We conclude that lower SES is characterised by more prolonged elevations in procoagulant responses following psychological stress, and that these processes might contribute to increased cardiac risk.

scholarly journals Incidence of H. pylori in all Endoscopies Done at Saveetha Medical College over the Last Two Years (2018-2020)

2021 ◽  
pp. 293-298
Author(s):  
S. Kirthika ◽  
M. Vinoth
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Major Health ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Prompt Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
H Pylori

Background: H. pylori infection is a major health ailment in most of the developing countries. The infection is associated with increasing morbidity and mortality ranging from chronic gastritis to gastric malignancies. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of H. pylori among patients tested positive for the same in Saveetha Medical College, Thandalam over the period of 2018-2020 and assess the incidence with factors like socioeconomic status, age and sex of the patients. Objectives: To determine the incidence of pylori for the patients who tested positive for the same over the period of 2018-2020. To assess the patients infected with pylori for various factors like age, sex and socioeconomic status. Materials and Methods: It is a retrospective type of study. The patients who tested positive for H. pylori infection in Saveetha Medical College over the period of 2018-2020 was taken into study. A total of 300 H. pylori infected patients were assessed for various factors like age, sex and socioeconomic status. Results: Out of 300 patients who tested positive for H.pylori were categorized based on age sex and socioeconomic status. Among 300 infected patients, 230 turned out to be men while only 70 cases seen among women. The prevalence was high among the age group > 60 (n=150; 50%) while the 40-60 recorded the second highest number of cases (30% n=90). 20-40 was the least affected group. Most of the cases were associated with low socioeconomic status, alcohol and smoking which contributes to the increased risk of acquiring the H. pylori infection. Conclusion: The incidence of H. pylori infection is high among the study group. Hence it is essential to provide prompt treatment and take adequate measures to prevent the risk factors.

Associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status on the risk of new onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) in cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
Atul Batra ◽  
Shiying Kong ◽  
Rodrigo Rigo ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Educational Attainment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Rural Residence ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Low Education

90 Background: Cancer patients are predisposed to CVD due to cancer treatments and shared risk factors (smoking/physical inactivity). We aimed to assess if rural residence and low socioeconomic status (SES) modify the risk of developing CVD. Methods: Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic solid organ cancers without baseline CVD in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2017 were identified using the population-based registry. Postal codes were linked with Census data to determine rural residence as well as neighborhood-level income and educational attainment. Low income was defined as <46000 CAD/annum; low education was defined as a neighborhood in which <80% attended high school. Myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrythmias and cerebrovascular accident constituted as CVD.We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the associations of rural residence and low SES with the development of CVD, adjusting for measured confounding variables. Results: We identified 81,275 patients diagnosed with cancer without pre-existing CVD. The median age was 62 years and 54.2% were women. The most prevalent cancer types included breast (28.6%), prostate (23.1%), and colorectal (14.9%). At a median follow-up of 68 months, 29.4% were diagnosed with new CVD. The median time from cancer diagnosis to CVD was 29 months. Rural patients (32.3 vs 28.4%,P < .001) and those with low income (30.4% vs 25.9%,P < .001) or low educational attainment (30.7% vs 27.6%,P < .001) experienced higher rates of CVD. After adjusting for baseline factors and treatment, rural residence (odds ratio[OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval[CI], 1.04-1.11;P < .001), low income (OR,1.17;95%CI,1.12-1.21;P < .001) and low education (OR,1.08;95%CI,1.04-1.11;P < .001) continued to associate with higher odds of CVD. Further, patients with colorectal cancer were more likely to develop CVD compared with other tumors (OR,1.12;95% CI,1.04-1.16;P = .001). A multivariate Cox regression model showed that patients with low SES were more likely to die, but patients residing rurally were not. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of cancer survivors develop CVD on follow-up. Despite universal healthcare, marginalized populations experience different CVD risk profiles that should be considered when operationalizing lifestyle modification strategies and cardiac surveillance programs. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Socioeconomic status determines COVID-19 incidence and related mortality in Santiago, Chile

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. eabg5298
Author(s):  
Gonzalo E. Mena ◽  
Pamela P. Martinez ◽  
Ayesha S. Mahmud ◽  
Pablo A. Marquet ◽  
Caroline O. Buckee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Socioeconomic Strata ◽  
Related Mortality

The current COVID-19 pandemic has impacted cities particularly hard. Here, we provide an in-depth characterization of disease incidence and mortality, and their dependence on demographic and socioeconomic strata in Santiago, a highly segregated city and the capital of Chile. Our analyses show a strong association between socioeconomic status and both COVID-19 outcomes and public health capacity. People living in municipalities with low socioeconomic status did not reduce their mobility during lockdowns as much as those in more affluent municipalities. Testing volumes may have been insufficient early in the pandemic in those places, and both test positivity rates and testing delays were much higher. We find a strong association between socioeconomic status and mortality, measured either by COVID-19 attributed deaths or excess deaths. Finally, we show that infection fatality rates in young people are higher in low-income municipalities. Together, these results highlight the critical consequences of socioeconomic inequalities on health outcomes.

“Incentive hope” and the nature of impulsivity in low-socioeconomic-status individuals

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Walsh ◽  
Erik Cheries ◽  
Youngbin Kwak
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Health Disparities ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Impulsive Behavior ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Future

AbstractLow-income environments have been associated with greater levels of impulsive behavior, which contribute to the higher debt and obesity rates that further perpetuate current wealth and health disparities. In this commentary, we describe how this might be explained by an appeal to “incentive hope” and the motivational drive toward consumption triggered by the future uncertainty these groups face.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document