scholarly journals Negative fluid balance 48 hours after admission improves survival at 28 days in critically ill patients

Critical Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Cuartero ◽  
AJ Betbese ◽  
K Nuñez ◽  
J Baldira ◽  
L Zapata
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Negative Fluid Balance

scholarly journals High Central Venous Pressure and Right Ventricle Size Are Related to Non-decreased Left Ventricle Stroke Volume After Negative Fluid Balance in Critically Ill Patients: A Single Prospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Hua ◽  
Ding Xin ◽  
Wang Xiaoting ◽  
Liu Dawei
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Right Ventricle ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Negative Fluid Balance

Background: Optimal adjustment of cardiac preload is essential for improving left ventricle stroke volume (LVSV) and tissue perfusion. Changes in LVSV caused by central venous pressure (CVP) are the most important concerns in the treatment of critically ill patients.Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the changes in LVSV after negative fluid balance in patients with elevated CVP, and to elucidate the relationship between the parameters of right ventricle (RV) filling state and LVSV changes.Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients with high central venous pressure (CVP) (≥8 mmHg) within 24 h of ICU admission in the Critical Medicine Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients were classified into two groups based on the LVSV changes after negative fluid balance. The cutoff value was 10%. The hemodynamic and echo parameters of the two groups were recorded at baseline and after negative fluid balance.Results: A total of 71 patients included in this study. Forty in VI Group (LVOT VTI increased ≥10%) and 31 in VNI Group (LVOT VTI increased <10%). Of all patients, 56.3% showed increased LVSV after negative fluid balance. In terms of hemodynamic parameters at T0, patients in VI Group had a higher CVP (p < 0.001) and P(v-a)CO2 (p < 0.001) and lower ScVO2 (p < 0.001) relative to VNI Group, regarding the echo parameters at T0, the RVD/LVD ratio (p < 0.001), DIVC end−expiratory (p < 0.001), and ΔLVOT VTI (p < 0.001) were higher, while T0 LVOT VTI (p < 0.001) was lower, in VI Group patients. The multifactor logistic regression analysis suggested that a high CVP and RVD/LVD ratio ≥0.6 were significant associated with LVSV increase after negative fluid balance in critically patients. The AUC of CVP was 0.894. A CVP >10.5 mmHg provided a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 77.4%. The AUC of CVP combined with the RVD/LVD ratio ≥0.6 was 0.926, which provided a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 80.4%.Conclusion: High CVP and RVD/LVD ratio ≥0.6 were significant associated with RV stressed in critically patients. Negative fluid balance will not always lead to a decrease, even an increase, in LVSV in these patients.

scholarly journals Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), a marker of positive fluid balance in critically ill patients: results of the ENVOL study

Critical Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Vigué ◽  
Pierre-Etienne Leblanc ◽  
Frédérique Moati ◽  
Eric Pussard ◽  
Hussam Foufa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Positive Fluid Balance

scholarly journals Relation between fluid balance and incidence of morbidity and mortality rates in critically ill patients prospective observational study

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M G A Gerges ◽  
H M M Elazzazi ◽  
M H S A Elsersi ◽  
S A R Mustafa ◽  
M A Saeed
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Cumulative Fluid Balance

Abstract Background While administration of fluid can be lifesaving, it has been suggested that the fluid accumulation after initial resuscitation and hemodynamic stabilization can contribute to potentially avoidable adverse effects and less favorable outcomes. Objective The aim of this study is to assess whether positive fluid balance in comparison with negative or even fluid balance is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates in critically ill patients. Patients and Methods This prospective observational study was performed on 145 Patients older than 18 years admitted to intensive care units at Helwan university hospitals and Ain shams university hospitals during the period from November 2017 till May 2018. Results A total of 145 patients with an ICU mortality rate of 14.5% were enrolled. The median cumulative fluid balance of the 124 patients who survive was -110 ml (IQR -2.1-2.2 L) after the fourth day following randomization while the median cumulative fluid balance of the 21 patients who not survive was 3800 ml (IQR 1.7-5.2 L) after the fourth day in ICU. In our study critically ill patients with fluid balance more than 1.2 litres per day had higher ICU complications: increased risk of AKI, longer ICU and hospital stays, and mechanical ventilation, and fluid balance was independently associated with mortality. Conclusion In the view of this study, we concluded that:Zero fluid balance and negative fluid balance independently associated with decrease mortality and morbidity rates in critically ill patients after 4 days from admission in ICU.There was higher cumulative fluid balance in non survivors compared to survivors. Cumulative fluid balance after 4 days from admission was independently predictive of mortality in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients.96 hour negative fluid balance in critically ill patients was associated with less length of stay at ICU and less mechanical ventilation duration.Positive fluid balance, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and high admission SAPS II, SOFA, APACHE II and KIDGO were significantly associated with high mortality.

scholarly journals Fluid balance as a biomarker: impact of fluid overload on outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

Critical Care ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M Bagshaw ◽  
Patrick D Brophy ◽  
Dinna Cruz ◽  
Claudio Ronco
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Fluid Overload ◽  
Kidney Injury

Value and determinants of the mean systemic filling pressure in critically ill patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (5) ◽  
pp. H1003-H1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Repessé ◽  
Cyril Charron ◽  
Julia Fink ◽  
Alain Beauchet ◽  
Florian Deleu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Filling Pressure ◽  
Time Of Death ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Mean Systemic Filling Pressure ◽  
Systemic Filling ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Systemic Filling Pressure

Mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) is a major determinant of venous return. Its value is unknown in critically ill patients (ICU). Our objectives were to report Pmsf in critically ill patients and to look for its clinical determinants, if any. We performed a prospective study in 202 patients who died in the ICU with a central venous and/or arterial catheter. One minute after the heart stopped beating, intravascular pressures were recorded in the supine position after ventilator disconnection. Parameters at admission, during the ICU stay, and at the time of death were prospectively collected. One-minute Pmsf was 12.8 ± 5.6 mmHg. It did not differ according to gender, severity score, diagnosis at admission, fluid balance, need for and duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of stay. Nor was there any difference according to suspected cause of death, classified as shock (cardiogenic, septic, and hemorrhagic) and nonshock, although a large variability of values was observed. The presence of norepinephrine at the time of death (102 patients) was associated with a higher 1-min Pmsf (14 ± 6 vs. 11.4 ± 4.5 mmHg), whereas the decision to forgo life-sustaining therapy (34 patients) was associated with a lower 1-min Pmsf (10.9 ± 3.8 vs. 13.1 ± 5.3 mmHg). In a multiple-regression analysis, norepinephrine (β = 2.67, P = 0.0004) and age (β = −0.061, P = 0.022) were associated with 1-min Pmsf. One-minute Pmsf appeared highly variable without any difference according to the kind of shock and fluid balance, but was higher with norepinephrine.

The dose - response association between fluid overload and hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiping Wang ◽  
Bo Zhu ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
Ying Wen ◽  
Bin Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Fluid Overload ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Fluid management is important for ensuring hemodynamic stability in critically ill patients but easily leads to fluid overload. However, the optimal fluid balance plot or range for critically ill patients is unknown. This study aimed to explore the dose-response relationship between fluid overload (FO) and hospital mortality in critically ill patients.Methods Data were derived from the China Critical Care Sepsis Trial (CCCST). Patients with sequential fluid data for the first 3 days of admission to the ICU were included. FO was expressed as the ratio of the cumulative fluid balance (L) and initial body weight (kg) at ICU admission as a percentage. Maximum fluid overload (MFO) was defined as the peak FO value during the first 3 days of ICU admission. We used logistic regression models with restricted cubic splines to assess the relationship between MFO and the risk of hospital mortality.ResultsIn total, 3850 patients were included, 929 (24.1%) of whom died in hospital. For each 1% L/kg increase in the FO, the risk of hospital mortality increased by 4% (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.05, P < 0.001). FO greater than 10% was associated with a 44% increased HR of hospital mortality compared with FO less than 5% (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27 - 1.67). Notably, we also found a non-linear dose-response association between MFO and hospital mortality.Conclusions Both higher and lower fluid balance were associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality. Further studies should explore this relationship and seek for the optimal fluid management strategies for critically ill patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document