scholarly journals Potential prognostic factors in progression-free survival for patients with cervical cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Hui Chen ◽  
Wei-Yu Meng ◽  
Run-Ze Li ◽  
Qing-Yi Wang ◽  
Yu-Wei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Initial Symptoms

Abstract Background Cervical cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer deaths among females in low and middle-income countries. In this study, we aimed to assess the independent prognostic value of clinical and potential prognostic factors in progression-free survival (PFS) in cervical cancer. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on 92 cervical cancer patients treated from 2017 to 2019 at the Zhuhai Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. Tumor characteristics, treatment options, progression-free survival and follow-up information were collected. Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess the PFS. Results Results showed that the number of retrieved lymph nodes had a statistically significant effect on PFS of cervical cancer patients (P = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that cervical cancer patients with initial symptoms age 25–39 had worse survival prognoses (P = 0.020). And the using of uterine manipulator in laparoscopic treatment showed a better prognosis (P < 0.001). A novel discovery of our study was to verify the prognostic values of retrieved lymph nodes count combining with FIGO staging system, which had never been investigated in cervical cancer before. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, significant improvements were found after the combination of retrieved lymph nodes count and FIGO stage in predicting PFS for cervical cancer patients (P < 0.001, AUC = 0.826, 95% CI: 0.689–0.962). Conclusion Number of retrieved lymph nodes, initial symptoms age, uterine manipulator, and retrieved lymph nodes count combining with FIGO staging system could be potential prognostic factors for cervical cancer patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic implication of human papillomavirus types in cervical cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Xu ◽  
Yichao Qiu ◽  
Shuang Yuan ◽  
Hongjing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
American Society ◽  
Hpv 18

Abstract Background To estimate the prognostic relevance of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV 18 in patients with cervical cancer. Method We searched PubMed, EMBASE, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), CNKI, and Wanfang databases to search primary articles illustrating the survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients with or without HPV 16/18 infection. A meta-analysis was conducted to generate a combined hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 13 studies were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that HPV 16 positive did not have any impact on OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI = 0.37–1.54; P = 0.44). Cervical cancer patiensts infected with HPV 18 had worse OS (HR, 1.66; 95% CI = 1.28–2.17; P = 0.0001), DFS (HR, 2.10; 95% CI = 1.73–2.54; P < 0.0001) and worse PFS (HR, 2.97; 95% CI = 1.69–5.23; P = 0.00012) compared with those not infected with HPV 18. cervical cancer patiensts infected with HPV 18 had worse PFS compared with those infected with HPV 16 ((HR, 1.34; 95% CI = 1.06–1.70; P = 0.01). Conclusion Cervical cancer patients infected with HPV 18 had worse survival compared with cervical cancer patients with HPV 16 infection.

scholarly journals TILs and Anti-PD1 Therapy: An Alternative Combination Therapy for PDL1 Negative Metastatic Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Yin ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Xiangling Sun ◽  
Ruili Li ◽  
Cuihua Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Background. We investigated the efficacy of TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy in patients with metastatic cervical cancer with low MSI expression and PDL1-negative. Methods. A total of 80 patients were put on TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy, and the progression-free survival time (PFS) and overall survival time (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that could predict the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer in the previously described patients. Results. The objective response rate was 25%, whereas the mPFS and mOS were 6.1 and 11.3 months, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy was influenced by the characteristics of TILs, infection with HPV, and development of fever just after the therapy. Conclusion. Overall, our results show that the combination therapy of TILs and anti-PD1 significantly improves the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer.

scholarly journals A descriptive report of outcomes of primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving either an adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-909
Author(s):  
Brooke A Schlappe ◽  
Qin C Zhou ◽  
Roisin O'Cearbhaill ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Robert A Soslow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectiveWe described progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant gynecologic versus gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens.MethodsWe identified all primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens at a single institution from 1994 to 2016. Gynecologic pathologists using strict pathologic/clinical criteria determined diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy was coded as gynecologic or gastrointestinal based on standard agents and schedules. Clinical/pathologic/treatment characteristics were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Progression-free and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, applying landmark analysis.ResultsOf 62 patients identified, 21 received adjuvant chemotherapy: 12 gynecologic, 9 gastrointestinal. Median age (in years) at diagnosis: 58 (range 25–68) gynecologic cohort, 38 (range 32–68) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.13). Median body mass index at first post-operative visit: 25 kg/m2(range 18–31) gynecologic cohort, 23 kg/m2(range 18–31) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.23). History of smoking: 6/12 (50%) gynecologic cohort, 3/9 (33%) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.66). Stage distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: stage I: 9/12 (75%) and 3/9 (33%); stage II: 2/12 (17%) and 1/9 (11%); stage III: 1/12 (8%) and 5/9 (56%) (p=0.06). Grade distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: grade 1: 8/12 (67%) and 1/9 (13%); grade 2/3: 4/12 (33%) and 7/9 (88%) (p=0.03). Three-year progression-free survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7 %) gynecologic, 53.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 79.6%) gastrointestinal. Three-year overall survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7%) gynecologic, 76.2% (95% CI 33.2% to 93.5%) gastrointestinal.ConclusionOngoing international collaborative research may further define associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival.

Results of subset analyses on overall survival (OS) from study CA184-043: Ipilimumab (Ipi) versus placebo (Pbo) in post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Drake ◽  
Eugene D. Kwon ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Alberto Bossi ◽  
Alfons JM van den Eertwegh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

2 Background: The CA184-043 phase 3 study did not reach statistical significance for its primary endpoint of OS (HR=0.85, p=0.053). However, antitumor activity was observed in other efficacy endpoints, including progression-free survival. Prespecified subset analyses were performed to understand if any prognostic features may identify mCRPC patients (pts) more likely to benefit from Ipi treatment. Methods: 799 pts were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy (RT) followed by either Ipi (N=399) or Pbo (N=400). Prespecified subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed using known prognostic factors for OS in mCRPC. Results: Prespecified subset analyses suggested that Ipi may be more active in pts with favorable prognostic factors, including no visceral disease, alkaline phosphatase <1.5 ULN, and hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL (Table). The safety profile in this study was consistent with previous reports of Ipi. Conclusions: Based on these subset analyses, Ipi added to RT appears to have greater activity than RT alone in pts with a favorable prognostic profile. These results support continued investigation of Ipi in the ongoing CA184-095 study in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00861614. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals UGT1A1 polymorphism has a prognostic effect in patients with stage IB or II uterine cervical cancer and one or no metastatic pelvic nodes receiving irinotecan chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Matsuoka ◽  
Ryusuke Murakami ◽  
Kaoru Abiko ◽  
Ken Yamaguchi ◽  
Akihito Horie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Conditional Inference ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Ugt1a1 Polymorphism ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

Abstract Background : Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1 family polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1 ) is a predictive biomarker for the side-effects of irinotecan; irinotecan chemotherapy reduces the volume of tumors harboring UGT1A1 polymorphisms. We aimed to determine whether UGT1A1 polymorphisms can predict progression-free survival in patients with local cervical cancer treated with irinotecan. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the data of 51 patients with cervical cancer treated at a single institution between 2010 and 2015. All patients were diagnosed with the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1, IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cell carcinoma, underwent radical hysterectomy, and received irinotecan chemotherapy as neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment. All patients were examined for irinotecan side effects using UGT1A1 tests. Conditional inference tree and survival analyses were performed considering stage, age, UGT1A1 status, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes to determine primary factors associated with progression-free survival. Results : The tree-structured survival model determined high recurrence-risk factors related to progression-free survival. The most relevant factor was ≥2 metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.004). The second most relevant was UGT1A1 genotype (p = 0.024). Among patients with ≤1 metastatic lymph node, those with UGT1A1 polymorphisms benefited from irinotecan chemotherapy and demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (p = 0.020) than those with wild-type UGT1A1 . Conclusion : Irinotecan chemotherapy has the potential to benefit patients with cervical cancer, UGT1A1 polymorphism, and ≤1 metastatic lymph nodes.

scholarly journals Postoperative radiotherapy of cervival carcinoma: Treatment results and analysis of prognostic factors

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-200
Author(s):  
V. Plesinac-Karapandzic ◽  
N. Borojevic ◽  
Z. Milosevic ◽  
B. Markovic ◽  
M. Nikitovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) and to investigate prognostic factors for early-stage cervical cancer patients. We reviewed the medical records of 162 cervical cancer patients treated by RT during 2003 year. RT included 30- 45Gy of external photons to pelvis in 12-25 fractions. Brachytherapy with 192Ir was delivered in 3-5 fractions to a dose of 27-32 Gy. The mean age was 49 years (range 27-71). Majority of patients 130 had Stage Ib. Radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed in 122pts. and simple hysterectomy in 40 pts. The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS) for all patients was 92,6% and disease-free survival (DFS) was 90,9%.There was statistically significant differences in OS and DFS in pat. with positive vs. negative pelvic lymph nodes; tumor 4cm vs. tumor <4cm; positive vs. negative surgical margin/residual tumor (p<0,05). Late GIT complications were determined in 35,8% and UT in 12,3%. In conclusion, postoperative radiotherapy has achieved high-satisfactory survival with acceptable complications. The survival benefit was less evident among patients with positive lymph nodes, tumor > 4cm and positive surgical margin/ residual tumor.

Apatinib as a salvage treatment in gynecologic cancer patients failed from two or more lines of prior chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17009-e17009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Congying Xie ◽  
Meng Su ◽  
Xiance Jin
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

e17009 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, an oral VEGFR2 inhibitor, in the treatment of advanced cervical and ovarian cancer patients who failed from two or more lines of chemotherapy. Methods: The advanced cervical and ovarian cancer patients, who experienced two or more lines of chemotherapy and treated with apatinib from April 2015 to January 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. All eligible patients received continuous apatinib treatment until disease progression, death, or intolerable toxicity. Survival and toxicities outcome were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and according to NCI-CTC4.0. Results: Twenty-six patients were eligible (cervical cancer:12 and ovarian cancer:14). After dose adjustment, 14 patients (53.8%) received 500 mg daily of apatinib, 8 patients received 250mg, 3 received 425mg and 1 received 675mg daily. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of cervical cancer and ovarian cancer were 8 months (95%CI:3.83-12.17) and 4 months (95%CI:1.57-6.44), respectively. Objective response rates in cervical cancer and ovarian cancer were 50% and 50%, respectively. Disease control rates were 100% for cervical cancer and 71.4% for ovarian cancer. Complete response was not observed in either cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. A 52-year old patient with recurrent ovarian cancer, experienced two lines of chemotherapy failure, was orally administered with apatinib at a dose of 250mg daily from November 2015, got partial response (PR) after one month, PFS have not yet reach. A 43-year old female patient with advanced cervical cancer, experienced three lines of chemotherapy failure, was orally administered with apatinib at a dose of 250mg daily from September 2015, got PR with a PFS of 14 months. The toxicities associated with apatinib treatment was generally acceptable with 8 patients developed grade 3/4 toxicity. The most common adverse events in this study were hypertension(n = 17), hand-foot syndrome(n = 24), and mouth mucositis(n = 20). Conclusions: Apatinib monotherapy showed promising efficiency with tolerable toxicity for advanced/recurrent cervical and ovarian cancer patients who failed from two or more lines of chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Can Predict the Prognosis in Bladder Cancer Patients Who Receive Gemcitabine and Nedaplatin Therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Ohtake ◽  
Takashi Kawahara ◽  
Ryo Kasahara ◽  
Hiroki Ito ◽  
Kimito Osaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Advanced Bladder Cancer ◽  
Overall Mortality

Introduction and Objectives. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been suggested to be a simple marker of the systemic inflammatory response in critical care patients. We previously assessed the utility of NLR as a biomarker to predict tumor recurrence and cancer death in bladder cancer patients who underwent radical cystectomy. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic impact of NLR in bladder cancer patients who received gemcitabine and nedaplatin (GN) chemotherapy.Methods. A total of 23 patients who received GN chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer were enrolled in this study. The cut-off point of NLR according to the sensitivity and specificity levels was derived from the area under receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) curve plotted for disease progression or overall mortality.Results. The NLR cut-off point was determined as 4.14 for both tumor progression and overall mortality. Median progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) in the higher NLR group (NLR ≥ 4.14) and lower NLR group (NLR < 4.14) were 194/468 days versus 73/237 days, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that higher NLR significantly correlated with poorer PFS (p=0.011) and OS (p=0.045).Conclusions. NLR may serve as a new biomarker to predict responses to GN-based chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer patients and/or their prognosis.

Prediction scoring system based on clinicohematologic parameters for cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1689-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youn Ji Kim ◽  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Jin Woo Shin ◽  
Biche Osong ◽  
Seok Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

ObjectiveA scoring system based on clinicohematologic parameters in cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiation has not been reported to date. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of clinicohematologic parameters in patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiation and to develop a prediction scoring system based on these results.MethodsA total of 107 patients who received definitive chemoradiation for cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. The clinical data and hematologic parameters were retrospectively reviewed, and their prognostic value in predicting survival was analyzed. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the changes in these hematologic parameters (ΔNLR, ΔPLR, and ΔLMR) between pre- and post-treatment were calculated to determine the specific value of these parameters for predicting patient survival.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 39.9 (range 2.7–114.6) months. The 3-year overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate were 80.9% (95% CI 72.7 to 90.0) and 53.4% (95% CI 44.1 to 64.8), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 67.5 months and the median overall survival was not reached. According to multivariable analysis, a ΔNLR≥0 was significantly associated with decreased progression-free survival (HR=2.91, 95% CI 1.43 to 5.94) and overall survival (HR=3.13, 95% CI 1.18 to 8.27). In addition, age (age <58.5 years; progression-free survival: HR=2.55, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.70; overall survival: HR=4.49, 95% CI 1.78 to 11.33) and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (Ⅲ-Ⅳ; progression-free survival: HR=2.49, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.43; overall survival: HR=3.02, 95% CI 1.32 to 6.90) were identified as predictors of poor survival.ConclusionsBoth the age and FIGO stage, as clinical parameters, and the ΔNLR, as a hematologic parameter, were independent prognostic factors for survival for cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation. Based on these results, we developed a risk score-based classification system for predicting survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document