scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes in a large community-based pain medicine practice: evaluation for use in phenotype modeling

Author(s):  
David A. Juckett ◽  
Fred N. Davis ◽  
Mark Gostine ◽  
Philip Reed ◽  
Rebecca Risko
2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Katz ◽  
Edward Yelin ◽  
Vaishali Patel ◽  
Xing-Yue Huang ◽  
Chiun-Fang Chiou

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 34S-51S ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Mansfield ◽  
Meera Viswanathan ◽  
Carol Woodell ◽  
Vesall Nourani ◽  
Yvonne U. Ohadike ◽  
...  

This article reports on an evaluation of the Merck Childhood Asthma Network, Inc. (MCAN) initiative using pooled cross-site data on patient-reported outcomes pre- and postintervention to quantify the changes experienced by children in five program sites supported by the network. The results show a consistent pattern of improvement across all measured outcomes, including symptoms, hospital and emergency department use, school absences, and caregiver confidence. Children who started with uncontrolled asthma experienced larger improvements than children with controlled asthma at baseline. However, even considering the significant gains made by children with uncontrolled asthma at baseline, after 12 months, most of the outcomes for these children were significantly worse than the 12-month outcomes for children with controlled asthma at baseline. The evaluation of the MCAN initiative offers a model that can be used in cases where resources must be balanced between evaluation and delivering services to children. The design process and results from the common survey instrument provide information for future initiatives seeking to translate evidence-based interventions in a community-based setting.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W Reynolds ◽  
Yiqiong Xie ◽  
Kendall B Knuth ◽  
Christina D Mack ◽  
Emma Brinkley ◽  
...  

Background COVID-19 has highlighted the need for new methods of pharmacovigilance. Here we use community volunteers to obtain systematic information on vaccine effectiveness and the nature and severity of breakthrough infections. Methods Between December 15, 2020 to September 16, 2021, 10,412 unpaid community-based participants reported the following information to an on-line registry: COVID-19 test results, vaccination (Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson), COVID-19 symptoms and perceived severity using a 4-point scale. COVID-19 infections were described for those who were 1) fully vaccinated, 2) partially vaccinated (received first of two dose vaccines or were <14 days post-final dose), or 3) unvaccinated. Results Of 8,554 who were vaccinated, COVID-19 infections were reported by 74 (1.0%) of those who were fully vaccinated and 198 (2.3%) of those who were partially vaccinated. Among the 74 participants who reported a breakthrough infection after full vaccination, the median time to reported positive test result was 104.5 days (Interquartile range: 77-135 days), with no difference among vaccine manufactures. One quarter (25.7%) of breakthrough infections in the fully vaccinated cases were asymptomatic. More than 97% of fully vaccinated participants reported no moderate/severe symptoms compared to 89.3% of the unvaccinated cases; and only 1.4% of fully vaccinated participants reported experiencing at least 3 moderate to severe symptoms compared to 7.8% in the unvaccinated. Conclusion Person-generated health data, also referred to as patient-reported outcomes, is a useful resource for quantifying breakthrough infections and their severity, showing here that fully vaccinated participants report no or very mild COVID-19 symptoms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document